Fury as Trump hands 'imperiled' grizzlies to hostile states

Conservationists warned on Tuesday that a new proposal by President Donald Trump’s Interior Department would permit more killing of grizzly bears, which are a threatened species in the lower 48 states of the US.

The Interior Department’s proposed rule would transfer management of grizzly bears from the federal government to states where Republican leaders have sought to strip the species of protections. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum announced the new proposal—with little specific detail—alongside Montana Gov. Greg Gianforte, Wyoming Gov. Mark Gordon, Idaho Gov. Brad Little, and Republican members of Congress.

Jenny Harbine, managing attorney for the Northern Rockies office at Earthjustice, said it is “extremely concerning that the Trump administration is seeking to hand over more management of the species to hostile Northern Rockies states.”

“While we need to see the details of this proposal, it could put grizzly bears at greater risk at a time of record mortality for the species,” said Harbine. “Anti-science political maneuvers should not be allowed to thwart grizzly bear recovery. If this proposal will further harm the species, we are prepared to take the administration to court.”

Andrea Zaccardi of the Center for Biological Diversity said that with its new proposal, “the Trump administration is trying to make it easier to kill imperiled grizzly bears.”

“Grizzlies shouldn’t be killed at the whim of the livestock industry while it exploits our public lands for its own personal profit,” said Zaccardi. “The science is clear that grizzlies need full federal protection to recover, not a rule that will lead to more grizzly bear mortality. We’ll be reviewing the rule and considering next steps.”

Fewer than 2,000 individual grizzly bears remain in isolated populations in the lower 48 states.

The Interior Department said its new proposal wouldn’t alter the bear’s listing status under the Endangered Species Act, which the Trump administration is trying to weaken. Opponents of the new proposal cautioned that giving more management to GOP-controlled states could be disastrous for the species, rejecting Republican officials’ claim that the bears have sufficiently recovered.

“This is a decision being made for political reasons, it is not based on science, in the best interest of the survival of the species, or in compliance with the requirements of the Endangered Species Act,” Greg LeDonne, Idaho director of Western Watersheds Project, said in a statement.