Georgia judge quietly allows Trump co-defendant to work on 2024 presidential campaign

A judge has ruled that Harrison Floyd, one of Donald Trump's co-defendants in the Georgia election interference case, will be able to work for the Trump 2024 campaign.

The former head of Black Voices for Trump had initially been barred from contacting other co-defendants as a condition of his bond.

But in a post to X, Floyd revealed that his bond conditions had been modified to allow his participation in the 2024 campaign for president.

"So…….. my bond was modified almost a month ago?!?!?" Floyd wrote. "I can work on the Trump 2024 ? Why am I just now finding out about this …….. a MONTH LATER !"

ALSO READ: TikTok disinformation is no more dangerous than this Fox News disinformation

Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee modified Floyd's bond conditions in a Feb. 23 order.

"The Defendant shall have no direct or indirect contact with any codefendant, witness, or any person specifically named in the indictment in this case; however, Defendant may have indirect contact with codefendant Trump concerning Defendant Floyd's employment, but any indirect contact shall not include the alleged facts of this case," the order said.

"Prohibited contact includes but is not limited to 'mentioning' (e.g., @[username]), referencing, tagging, direct messaging, following or subscribing to, liking posts by another user that would violate this order if posted by the Defendant, commenting on or replying to posts by another user that would violate this order if posted by the Defendant," the document added.

Floyd's bond amount was left at $100,000. He has been charged with violating the state's RICO Act, conspiracy to commit solicitation, and influencing witnesses.

After losing the election, Trump and his team allegedly attempted to overturn the results in Georgia, a key battleground state that Joe Biden won by a slim margin.

The charges stem from a series of efforts, including a phone call Trump made to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, where he suggested Raffensperger could "find" enough votes to reverse the election outcome. The investigation in Georgia focuses on whether these actions violated state laws against election interference and fraud. This case is part of broader scrutiny over Trump's post-election conduct across several states.