Legal experts perplexed why Trump-appointed judge refuses to rule on Trump tax case until other Trump cases are decided

Legal experts are scratching their heads after a federal judge appointed by President Donald Trump announced on Tuesday he is delaying handing down his decision in a Trump tax returns case until other federal judges hand down their decisions in other Trump cases. That judge is a former Trump transition team volunteer and has donated to the Trump campaign.

District Judge Trevor McFadden of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia announced he will hold up his ruling in a case brought by the House Ways and Means Committee against the U.S. Treasury Dept. The case involves gaining access to six years of Trump's tax returns. The law clearly says the IRS "shall" hand them over to Congress. The Trump administration says Congress has no right to investigate.

Back in August Judge McFadden pushed back against House Democrats, denying "their request to both expedite consideration of the case and to decide on its merits without holding a trial," Politico had reported.

Last year over a separate case former Democratic governor and presidential candidate Howard Dean issued a strong rebuke of Judge McFadden:

Law.com Senior editor Mike Scarcella offers this insight into why McFadden possibly might be staying his ruling: the judge "served as an unpaid volunteer on Trump’s presidential transition team."

Meanwhile, legal experts are perplexed.

Here's a writer in residence for the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University:

Exec. Editor of legal website Above the Law:

National Law Journal reporter covering the DC courts and the legal side of politics:

More:

Image via Wikimedia