RawStory
RawStory

All posts tagged "elon musk"

'Backward': Elon Musk called out by Trump Cabinet member over DOGE firings

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Friday called out Elon Musk's moves to cut government waste with government workforce firings "backward."

“The focus should have been on cutting the waste, fraud and abuse, and the people you could do over time,” Lutnick said in an interview with Axios co-founder Mike Allen. “I thought he got that backward.”

Lutnick was critical of Musk's decisions, saying he should have focused on cutting back government spending, The Washington Post reports.

He also pointed to how the billionaire, the now second-wealthiest person on the planet, "got caught up in other people’s objectives.” He suggested that Musk may have pushed the efforts to slash federal employees ahead of President Donald Trump's Cabinet secretaries.

Instead of broad workforce reductions, Lutnick expects that identifying waste would be the government-cutting efforts and focus next. He cited that government employees are a "relatively small percentage of government spending," The Post reports.

Lutnick says he anticipates the Department of Government Efficiency will still be effective in the future, but finds it is “less effective than I would have hoped.”

Musk, who previously led DOGE in an effort to make good on President Donald Trump’s pledge to eradicate wasteful government spending.

This week, Rep. John Larson (D-CT) called on the Tesla CEO to be dragged in front of a House committee to testify on how Social Security data was compromised under his direction.

“We asked Elon Musk and DOGE to come before the [House] Ways and Means Committee, and they refused to come,” Larson said, speaking Wednesday on the House floor at the Capitol in Washington, D.C.

Musk's relationship with the Trump administration had soured after he criticized the "Big, Beautiful Bill" over X, which the South African-born billionaire said he later regretted. As a "special government employee," his role was limited to 130 days only.

'They believe they’re above the law!' Lawmaker moves to let whistleblower loose on Musk

Rep. John Larson (D-CT) laid into Elon Musk Wednesday for his brief stint serving the Trump administration, calling on the Tesla CEO to be dragged in front of a House committee to testify on how Social Security data was compromised under his direction.

Musk had previously led the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, in an effort to make good on President Donald Trump’s pledge to eradicate wasteful government spending. As part of that effort, Musk and his DOGE staff – many of them between the ages of 19 and 24 – copied Americans’ Social Security data to an unsecure cloud server, according to a whistleblower.

“We asked Elon Musk and DOGE to come before the [House] Ways and Means Committee, and they refused to come,” Larson said, speaking Wednesday on the House floor at the Capitol in Washington, D.C.

“Why? Because they believe they're above the law! They don't believe that they're accountable to an equal branch of government, and now they've gone in and taken the data that they were after!”

According to the whistleblower, DOGE officials under Musk put as many as 300 million Americans’ Social Security data at risk. Coincidently, around three months after Musk left his gig at the White House, a massive data breach occurred that impacted 2.9 billion records, which included names, addresses and Social Security numbers.

And now, Larson is calling not just for Musk to be brought before Congress to testify, but the whistleblower as well.

“It's long overdue, that as an equal branch of government, we hold the executive branch accountable when they are taking peoples' personal data and social security and exposing it!” Larson shouted. “There is no reason why any 24 year old, unvetted, unaccountable person should have access to any Americans' Social Security information!”

Larson said that he had asked on Tuesday to have a hearing called to provide the whistleblower an opportunity to share the extent of potential dangers created under Musk’s leadership of DOGE. As to why Musk would be interested in Social Security data, Larson argued the reason to be the most obvious one.

“Why is Elon Musk after it?” Larson said. “Because that data contains information about the $2.7 trillion of the peoples' money that's in Social Security! And if I sound a little angry, it's because I am, and every American ought to be angered and outraged that this is going on!”

Watch the video below or use this link.

Elon Musk loses title of world's richest person

Billionaire Elon Musk has reportedly lost his claim to be the "world's richest person."

Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison's wealth increased to $393 billion after his company reported strong earnings on Tuesday. In contrast, Musk's current net worth is $385 billion.

According to Bloomberg, Ellison, 81, experienced the "biggest one-day increase ever recorded." His company credited the surging demand for Artificial Intelligence infrastructure.

The Oracle co-founder is reportedly close to President Donald Trump.

Musk has twice lost the title of world's richest person after first capturing it in 2021. Tesla recently offered him a pay package that could be worth nearly $1 trillion.

'Cat fight!' Dems giddy as ugly brawl threatens midterm massacre

WASHINGTON — Elon Musk may have packed up and gone home weeks ago, but he’s still got a grip on Washington’s political class.

While Republicans cling to the coattails of the world’s wealthiest man — whether or not he’s tweet-shaming the GOP agenda on his social media platform, X — many Democrats are cheering the Tesla CEO’s latest foray into politics, with the soft launch of his “America Party.”

Musk’s initially cringe-inducing breakup with President Donald Trump is mostly in the rearview, and many veteran Democrats remain wary of the heavy-spending billionaire.

“A man that rich can do a lot of things,” Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL) told Raw Story at the Capitol recently. “He can also fake a lot of things, so I’m not sure how serious he is.”

Musk may no longer lead the Department of Government Efficiency — or DOGE — but he’s still a Washington player. And with next year’s midterm elections looming, members of both parties are trying to simultaneously avoid and court him.

‘I wouldn’t say he's turning on us’

Musk and Trump formally parted ways at the end of May, but just a few days later things got awkward as they took to their social media companies to digitally pummel each other.

After Musk lambasted Trump’s signature tax cut and tough-on-migrants spending bill, Trump complained of being "disappointed" in his former wingman.

Musk then dropped what he called the "really big bomb" — and accused the president of being “in the Epstein files.”

Republicans in Congress struggled to make sense of the fight between their leader that some call “Daddy,” and the sugar daddy who dropped upwards of $290 million on the 2024 election.

This summer, the Musk-aligned Building America’s Future PAC doled out more than $1 million promoting Trump’s agenda, including his signature “One Big Beautiful Bill” — which perplexed many political watchers, as at the same time Musk repeatedly used social media to rip a bill he labeled a “disgusting abomination.”

“Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong,” Musk posted in early June. “You know it.”

Wrong or not, many rank-and-file Republicans who voted to pass Trump’s agenda want to appease Musk too.

“I agree with Musk,” Rep. Eric Burlison (R-MO) told Raw Story at the time.

“We need more people like Elon Musk, because being in the arena and being on the battlefield and fighting, that air cover is awesome.”

For many — if not most — in the GOP, Musk’s declaration that he’s starting a third party doesn’t mean he’s parting ways with the Republican Party they call home.

“I wouldn’t say he's turning on us, he's got a right to his opinion,” Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-OK) told Raw Story. “Turning on us would be him going back to the dark side: the Democrats.”

On that Democratic side, things are awkward too.

Generally, Democrats view Musk’s promised third party as a net win, a move that will split the right-wing vote.

“Oh I definitely think it will be better for Dems,” Rep. John Larson (D-CT) told Raw Story.

“That obviously would help us. We’ll take it. I think we’re gonna do well no matter what. House Democrats did extraordinarily well [in 2024]. We actually picked up seats in a time that had gone heavily against the trends.”

“Republicans should worry more. Much more so,” Rep. Don Beyer (D-VA) told Raw Story.

Democrats don’t have many good inroads to Musk, in part because DOGE focused on slashing and burning rather than building, Beyer said.

“I don’t know anybody that doesn’t want to make [government] more efficient. I’d love just the modernization. Makes perfect sense to me.

“Even things like deficit reduction, I’m on his side. We need to have much better deficit reduction, not the way [Republicans are] doing it, which is cut all the hospitals and services [like] Medicaid and then still drive [the deficit] up $4 to $5 trillion.”

With the Democratic Party promising to get “big money” out of politics, cheering on the world’s richest man is awkward — a point many veteran Democrats understand.

‘He’s got no base’

On the other side of the Capitol, most Democratic senators remain wary of Musk.

“Is it good for Democrats to just not have his money behind the GOP this time around, seemingly?" Raw Story asked the Democratic whip.

“I think there are going to be outrageous unlimited amounts of money regardless, and what impact he’ll have on either political party remains to be seen,” Durbin said.

“At the moment we only know the message that he is personally grieved. If there’s more, perhaps he can build a political base.”

Democrats are increasingly united in wariness of Musk and his meddling.

“I don't know yet [about the third party],” Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) told Raw Story. “Like, he certainly has the money. Right? But he also has to have people who decide to go with him.

“He's got no base. Until I see that, it's interesting. I enjoy a cat fight between two men. But until I see who joins [Musk], I can't say that this is a real thing.”

What is real is voter unrest.

“There are a lot of disaffected voters,” said Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA). “Absolutely.”

Polling shows many Democratic voters are disaffected with Fetterman, one of the more independent-minded senators in either party, who has supported Trump nominees and sided with Israel in its war in Gaza.

“At points I’m at odds with my party,” Fetterman conceded, “and I know I’ve had colleagues on the other side that were at odds with their side too. I don’t know if we're ready for a third party in that sense, but without a doubt there are a lot of disaffected voters.”

“Last I saw, you were doing better with Republicans than Democrats?” Raw Story pressed.

“I have a great relationship with my parents,” Fetterman said, alluding to his blue-collar, conservative Pennsylvania roots — the very groups Democrats alienated and Musk courted last year.

Stephen Miller's wife leaves job with Elon Musk months after rumors swirled

Katie Miller, a former White House aide and wife of deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, is ending her work for Elon Musk and starting up a self-titled podcast.

The 33-year-old Miller had been a liaison between the White House and Musk when he oversaw the Department of Government Efficiency, but she followed him back to the private sector when he left the government at the end of May, leading to the swirling of rumors, and now she's leaving her post supporting the tech mogul's ventures and taking on investors to launch her online talk show, reported Axios.

"For MAGA and President Trump's legacy to grow long-term, we must talk to conservative women," Miller said.

Miller envisions her podcast as "a place for conservative women to gather online," and while she doesn't intend to focus on politics, she also pointed out there's "no conservative answer to 'Call Her Daddy,'" the hugely popular, pop culture-focused podcast hosted by Alex Cooper.

"There isn't a place for a mom like me to get lifestyle information, news, laugh with our friends, gossip about what's going on in the world from our perspective," Miller said. The podcast will be "about women, for women — with men, too, talking about what matters to women."

Miller interviewed Vice President JD Vance on Wednesday for her introductory podcast, and she has also talked with boxing legend Mike Tyson and former ESPN broadcaster Sage Steele, and she said her husband has been "incredibly supportive" of her new venture and has even helped her land guests.

"I'm incredibly grateful to President Trump and Elon for the ability to enact lasting change," Miller said. "We got a lot done. ... We reshaped how the federal bureaucracy views government spending. I hope Elon is a listener to the podcast and I hope to have him as a guest one day."

This massive corporate bonus reveals everything about Trump's America

Tesla announced on Monday that it’s granting additional shares to Elon Musk worth around $29 billion. Tesla’s board describes it as a “first step, ‘good faith’ payment” to Musk — even as Tesla continues to battle in court over reinstating an even bigger pay package that a Delaware judge struck down.

Why is this giant pay package necessary, you might ask, when Musk already holds 13 percent of the company, worth hundreds of billions?

It’s not as if Tesla is thriving and Musk has contributed to its profitability. In fact, Tesla’s sales and profit are falling and it’s losing market share. Tesla’s stock is now down about 20 percent for the year. The company hasn’t reported an increase in quarterly earnings since the third quarter of 2024.

Tesla’s downward profit spiral is mainly due to Musk’s involvement in right-wing politics, which has alienated many car buyers. Although Musk has officially left the Trump administration, he is still nosing around politics. He’s even talking about starting a third party.

And let’s be clear: His political power comes directly from his wealth. Tesla’s making him $29 billion wealthier arguably makes American politics $29 billion dirtier.

It’s not as if Musk needs the additional money. He’s already the world’s richest person, worth about $350 billion.

So why is Tesla’s board giving him a $29 billion raise?

Because Musk hinted last month that he wanted more shares in Tesla to prevent his ouster by “activist” shareholders. It was a “major concern,” he said on an earnings call with analysts.

But this excuse begs the question of why activist shareholders would want him ousted if he were doing such a good job at Tesla. The answer is he’s obviously not doing a good job, and he knows it.

Tesla’s directors aren’t exerting better control over Musk because the board is packed with Musk’s close friends and his brother. This is called a conflict of interest, people.

In fact, what Musk is doing to Tesla is a smaller version of what Trump is doing to America: fleecing it while running it into the ground.

And Tesla’s board’s response is a miniature version of the way congressional Republicans are responding to Trump: rubber-stamping whatever he wants.

Many Tesla shareholders, meanwhile, resemble Trump’s MAGA base. They’ve made a cult out of Musk and applaud anything that keeps him at Tesla despite his breathtakingly irresponsible performance as CEO.

Call it authoritarian capitalism.

Trump, Vance and Musk are avatars of a dark and dangerous force

James Carville recently suggested that Democrats need to do more to reach out to young men, as though pandering to testosterone-fueled grievance and entitlement is the key to winning elections. Let’s be blunt: that’s a bullshit, dead-end strategy that risks ratifying the very worst elements of a crisis in masculinity that’s corroding our politics, poisoning our culture, and endangering our democracy.

And it’s coming from the top, down.

Donald Trump is an adjudicated rapist, according to the judge in his case. A New York jury found him liable for sexually assaulting E. Jean Carroll in a civil case, and he’s remained unapologetic. Then he moved straight to pardoning other men in his orbit, even convicted ones like Roger Stone and a rapper with a history of alleged sexual assault. And now he’s telling us to stop talking about Jeffrey Epstein.

Epstein wasn’t an outlier: he was a prototype. A predator who operated in plain sight, protected by the powerful, and normalized by the elite. His crimes weren’t hidden; they were ignored, downplayed, and rationalized until they became impossible to deny.

The recent revelations about the scope of his network, and the prominent men it touched, show how deeply entrenched rape culture is not just at the fringes of politics, but at its very core.

Trump pardoned multiple anti-abortion criminals as well as Ross Ulbricht, who ran the world’s most notorious market for illicit drugs (that some allege could also have been used for human trafficking); Trump's administration apparently helped free Andrew and Tristan Tate, rightwing influencers accused of rape in Romania, from prison in that country, so they could return to America to help promote the GOP to their young male followers.

Rape culture isn’t just at the top; it’s everywhere, especially in the digital spaces young men inhabit. Pornography has become the de facto sex education for millions of boys. A ten‑year‑old with a smartphone has unfettered access to violent, misogynistic content that normalizes coercion and degradation.

This isn’t just a parental issue, it’s a cultural emergency. This content is shaping how an entire generation understands sex, power, and consent.

And Trump’s “best friend” Epstein was an avatar of that twisted worldview.

Trump and Epstein were reportedly best buds for years, partying together, traveling together on Epstein’s private jet, enjoying the same grotesque perks of unchecked wealth.

Both political parties have brushed shoulders with predators, but only one is building a platform that protects them by law. Virtually every Republican in the House of Representatives just voted to conceal the information about Epstein our government currently has.

And now, Elon Musk echoes that same ideology with a techno-eugenic twist, building a brood while normalizing control over women’s bodies in the name of “saving civilization.”

Musk is openly using white women as baby incubators. Musk has fathered at least 14 children with four different women. He’s talked openly about a global “underpopulation crisis” and described his mission to produce a “legion-level” brood of children before the apocalypse. He’s recruited mothers via X, and allegedly dangled millions in hush-money deals. This isn’t family values: it’s eugenic breeding with a Big Daddy tint.

That’s also largely what the so‑called “Tradwife” movement is selling. On social media and in right-wing circles, we’re seeing a resurgence of the Traditional Wife persona; it’s not really about choice or liberty as they try to sell it, but hierarchy. White women are expected to go “back to the kitchen and bedroom,” producing more white babies in a panic about the “browning” of America.

This fixation on race and reproduction mirrors the same “Great Replacement Theory” rhetoric promoted on Fox “News” and other rightwing outlets that fed the Charlottesville rally and inspired mass murderers in Las Vegas, Buffalo, and El Paso.

From Trump saying, “If Hillary Clinton can’t satisfy her husband what makes her think she can satisfy America?” to telling Esquire Magazine that “arm candy” is essential for a successful businessman (“You know, it doesn’t really matter what [the media] write as long as you’ve got a young and beautiful piece of ass”) to sarcastically calling Kamala Harris “a beautiful woman,” our president has long made clear his thoughts on the role of women.

JD Vance has similarly pushed the tradwife meme, arguing that:

“I think that we should fight for the right of every American to live a good life in the country they call their own, to raise a family and dignity on a single middle-class job.”

That “single” job is the key; he’s not talking about economic advancement in the middle class but, rather, pitching the idea that dad should work and mom should stay home to cook, clean, and attend to the kids.

And, like in the 1950s and before, it’s all undergirded by state violence. Jessica Valenti writes with clarity and horror at her Abortion Every Day Substack, documenting how Red states are now arresting women for miscarriages and far, far worse is on the horizon.

Law enforcement officers in Red states are now interrogating women who seek care for pregnancy complications, Republican Attorneys General are demanding records of miscarriages and abortions even from Blue states, and doctors are afraid to treat women in crisis, leading to a doubling in the use of blood transfusions (women almost bleeding to death) in Texas since they passed their draconian abortion ban. It’s deliberate, and it’s escalating.

And now Republicans in Congress and the states are openly talking about bringing back enforcement of the Comstock Act of 1873, the Victorian-era law banning not just abortion but contraception and obscene materials, as I wrote about in The Cold Dead Hand of Anthony Comstock.

Meanwhile, the fetal personhood movement backed by Trump and Vance is becoming mainstream. As vice president, J.D. Vance spoke at the 2025 March for Life rally, declaring “I want more babies in the United States of America” and aligned himself with the GOP’s agenda of fetal personhood, a policy that could make IVF, contraception, and even most miscarriage treatment illegal.

This is a deliberate, systemic reinforcement of toxic masculinity, an ideology of power, control, and domination.

It shows up in incel forums, Proud Boys gatherings, Andrew Tate videos, and in the halls of Congress. It’s being sold to young men as an antidote to their anxieties, be they economic, social, or existential.

From Mar-a-Lago to Manhattan’s Upper East Side, rape culture isn’t fringe: it’s the foundation. And it’s a lie.

Some Republicans will pretend to claim that they just want to return America to the Leave It To Beaver world of June Cleaver, the happy homemaker of 1960s TV. What they don’t like to point out, though, is that in the 1960s most women didn’t have much of a choice.

When Republicans say that your grandmother stayed with your grandfather and should be your role model, they fail to point out that women three generations ago really had few choices unless they were independently wealthy.

Employers could refuse to hire women because of their gender as recently as 1964; home sellers and real estate agents could refuse to sell a house to women up until 1974; it wasn’t until 1988 that the law said landlords could no longer refuse to rent to women. Spousal rape wasn’t criminalized until 1993.

When Louise and I got married in 1972, she couldn’t get a credit card or sign a mortgage without the signature of me, her brother, or her father. She couldn’t serve on a jury, get a no-fault divorce, or enroll in an Ivy League college. And if she’d had an unwanted pregnancy, she’d be out of luck until 1973’s Roe v Wade decision.

In 20 states, Republicans have succeeded in removing from women one of the most important options that allow them to stay in the workplace: abortion of an accidental or unwanted pregnancy. Now they’re going after birth control. And their war on DEI is just another aspect of their war on their own women, as white women are the main beneficiaries of the DEI programs Republicans are demanding corporations and government agencies end.

Republicans are even working hard on ending no-fault divorce: as Vance said, women should stay home and serve their husbands even when those men are physically or emotionally abusive.

They ignore the reality of an 8 to 16 percent decrease in female suicides after states enacted no-fault divorce laws, a roughly 30 percent decrease in intimate partner violence, and a 10 percent drop in women murdered by their partners. Or maybe they just don’t care.

Republican legislators are also pushing back hard against equal-pay-for-equal-work laws, calling such efforts DEI, again arguing that women shouldn’t be on the job in the first place.

These are all aspects of a crisis of masculinity and rape culture that Republicans are exploiting to the detriment of both women and the men who’re buying their perverted siren song.

Thus, Democratic consultants’ calls to “reach out” to young men without challenging these ideas are dangerous. They can be interpreted as code for validation, not transformation.

What we need instead is a redefinition of masculinity: strength defined by compassion, power defined by service, leadership defined by respect.

And there are real exemplars out there.

Look at former Sen. Jon Tester, Montana farmer and Marine vet, who fights for working families without preening bravado. Look at former President Joe Biden — yes, him — who has comforted grieving mothers and lent moral clarity and empathy where so many others have failed. Look at single fathers, teachers, firefighters, nurses, community organizers: men who show up because they care, not to conquer.

True masculinity uplifts. It nurtures. It protects without demeaning. It leads with humility. It affirms the full humanity of women.

That’s the kind of man worth celebrating and inviting young men to be. Not the guy who calls himself a “legion” builder, or hustles violent porn on the internet and brags of his conquests on YouTube, or thinks women exclusively belong at home to “raise the babies.”

Democrats shouldn’t pander to wounded pride. They shouldn’t validate grievance or reinforce entitlement. They should, instead, challenge men to grow up; to become allies in a fight for justice, equality, and democracy.

Redefining masculinity isn’t a side project: it’s central to reclaiming our national soul.

Let Republicans hold up Trump, Musk, and Tate as their sick, twisted role models. Democrats should amplify the real men: the compassionate, the just, the fierce protectors of freedom and equality.

Let’s reject the calls coming from multiple corners to “reach out” to codes of rape culture. Instead, let’s lead the way to a future where strength means service, power means accountability, and freedom means equality for everyone.

Stephen Miller's wife answers rumors about Elon Musk: 'My paychecks still come from him'

Former White House aide Katie Miller, who's also the wife of deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, confirmed she's still working for tech mogul Elon Musk.

Rumors had swirled in Washington that Miller, who followed Musk out of the White House at the end of May, had ended her working relationship with the former Department of Government Efficiency head after his explosive falling-out with President Donald Trump, but she told Reuters that wasn't the case.

"My paycheck still comes from him," she told the news service.

Miller declined to describe her role with Musk or whether she serves as a spokesperson for him or his companies, but shortly after speaking to Reuters she issued a press release on behalf of his artificial intelligence company xAI condemning an environmental group's actions against the company in Tennessee.

Trump had appointed her as an adviser to the DOGE Service, but Miller left the White House with Musk and appeared to work for him as a communications adviser, but both of their recent social media activity suggested a split.

Miller took down a banner photo of a SpaceX rocket and instead highlighted her role as a wife and mother, while Musk recently unfollowed her account on his X platform after unfollowing her husband weeks earlier, although he now follows him again.

Individuals who have worked with Miller described her a Trump loyalist and expressed surprise that she would work for Musk as he seeks to undercut the president's policies and threatens third-party campaign activity to weaken the Republican Party.

‘Insane’: Nobel-winning economist torches Musk’s failed bid to MAGA-fy AI

Nobel-Prize-winning columnist Paul Krugman claimed in a new Substack article that Elon Musk's Grok chatbot started calling itself "MechaHitler" and spewing antisemitic tropes because it was pushed too far to the right by its creator in an overcorrection gone horribly wrong.

Musk has been working to undo the damage ever since, and the fallout even led to the ouster of X CEO Linda Yaccarino this week.

In the article, Krugman explained that AI naturally skews its answers more to the left of the political spectrum because the "reality" it has gleaned doesn't "adhere to the right-wing party line."

He argued that since Republicans have "staked out positions" on issues like climate change and social programs "that run completely counter to informed views." Republicans and Libertarians like Musk consider AI's answers to be biased to the left.

"Hence the Musk/MechaHitler disaster," Krugman wrote. "Musk tried to nudge Grok into being less 'politically correct,' but what Musk considers political correctness is often what the rest of us consider just a reasonable description of reality. The only way to move Grok right was, in effect, to get it to buy into conspiracy theories, many of them, as always, involving a hefty dose of antisemitism."

Krugman argued that MAGA will always have an issue with AI because chatbots often give answers "the movement doesn’t want to hear."

"And there’s no good fix for this problem, because the fault lies not in the models but in the movement," Krugman continued. "As far as we can tell, there isn’t any way to make an AI MAGA-friendly without also making it vile and insane."

Read the Substack article here.

There's only one way to save Social Security from Elon Musk's clutches

The Trump administration is lying about Social Security. Elon Musk’s DOGE has infiltrated the Social Security Administration (SSA). The agency’s new commissioner, Wall Street billionaire Frank Bisignano, calls himself “a DOGE person.” His top lieutenants include long-time Musk associates Antonio Gracias and Aram Moghaddassi.

After infiltrating Social Security, the DOGE crew forced out thousands of civil servants, including top leaders with decades of institutional knowledge. No problem, they thought. We’ll replace them with 19-year-old Edward “Big Balls” Coristine and an AI chatbot.

That plan is going exactly as expected. Mistakes are being made, checks are being delayed, lines are hours long, and field offices are being run by skeleton crews. The 1-800 number has record wait times — if people can get past the chatbot and speak to a human at all.

In the face of an outcry from the press and the public about wait times on the phone, SSA is shifting 1,000 people from the field offices to the phone lines. These people haven’t been trained to work the phone lines, which use a different software. And of course, taking them out of field offices will only make the delays there worse.

Thanks to Trump and the Republicans, Social Security’s customer service is headed for a total collapse. Bisignano is responding by shuffling deck chairs on the Titanic — and telling the passengers not to believe their lying eyes. Except instead of an iceberg, Social Security is collapsing due to a torpedo launched by a Republican U-boat that has blown a hole in it.

SSA recently sent out a press release touting improved customer service. Anyone who has recently been to a Social Security field office, or tried calling the 1-800 number, can tell you that every word in that release is a lie. Bisignano knows it, too. That’s why he pulled down data from SSA’s website tracking wait times.

For people who rely on Social Security benefits, these delays are life and death. Republican DOGE operatives have accidentally declared living people dead, meaning that their benefits stop, and they can lose access to their health insurance and bank account. These people are then stuck in a bureaucratic nightmare, frantically trying to get overwhelmed field office workers to “revive” them.

The delays are also a disaster for people who apply for Social Security’s disability benefits. And everything is getting worse, not better.

That is because a collapse is the goal. The Republicans have wrecked the system so they can rob it. They cause the crisis with cuts and then hope to force a fire sale to private equity, the robber barons of the modern era.

The King of the robber barons is Musk himself. The Department of Defense recently signed a $200 million contract to use Musk’s AI, Grok (or as it calls itself, MechaHitler). With Bisignano constantly talking up the “benefits” of AI, we can guess that Social Security is not far behind. If Musk and Trump get their way, a racist chatbot may soon decide who is eligible to get their earned benefits.

To see what that collapse could look like, we need only look at a different part of the federal government — the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Two days after the disastrous Texas floods, Kristi Noem fired thousands of the workers who answer the agency’s disaster assistance line. As a result, nearly two-thirds of calls went unanswered, leaving people who had just lost everything without the help they desperately needed.

Republican politicians hate effective government programs, because they don’t make any money for their paymasters on Wall Street. Since Social Security is the most popular and effective government program, they hate it most of all — and are doing everything they can to destroy it.

The only way to save Social Security is to make as much noise as possible. Call your members of Congress at 202-224-3121 and demand they protect Social Security from DOGE destruction. And tell all your family and friends to do the same.

Alex Lawson is the Executive Director of Social Security Works, the convening organization of the Strengthen Social Security Coalition -- a coalition made up of over 340 national and state organizations representing over 50 million Americans

Watch the video here.

There's only one way to save Social Security from Elon Musk's clutches | Opinion

Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Raw Story Investigates and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.