RawStory
RawStory

All posts tagged "robert f. kennedy jr"

Trump's decisions have now put our children at deadly risk

By David Higgins, Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus

The committee advising the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on vaccine policy voted on Dec. 5, 2025, to stop recommending that all newborns be routinely vaccinated against the hepatitis B virus — undoing a 34-year prevention strategy that has nearly eliminated early childhood hepatitis B infections in the United States.

Before the U.S. began vaccinating all infants at birth with the hepatitis B vaccine in 1991, around 18,000 children every year contracted the virus before their 10th birthday — about half of them at birth. About 90 percent of that subset developed a chronic infection.

In the U.S., 1 in 4 children chronically infected with hepatitis B will die prematurely from cirrhosis or liver cancer.

Today, fewer than 1,000 American children or adolescents contract the virus every year – a 95 percent drop. Fewer than 20 babies each year are reported infected at birth.

I am a pediatrician and preventive medicine specialist who studies vaccine delivery and policy. Vaccinating babies for hepatitis B at birth remains one of the clearest, most evidence-based ways to keep American children free of this lifelong, deadly infection.

What spurred the change?

In September 2025, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, or ACIP, an independent panel of experts that advises the CDC, debated changing the recommendation for a dose of the hepatitis B vaccine at birth, but ultimately delayed the vote.

This committee regularly reviews vaccine guidance. However, since Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. disbanded the entire committee and handpicked new members, its activity has drastically departed from business as usual. The committee has long-standing procedures for evaluating evidence on the risks and benefits of vaccines, but these procedures were not followed in the September meeting and were not followed for this most recent decision.

The committee’s new recommendation keeps the hepatitis B vaccine at birth for infants whose mothers test positive for the virus. But the committee now advises that infants whose mothers test negative should consult with their health-care provider. Parents and health-care providers are instructed to weigh vaccine benefits, vaccine risks and infection risks using “individual-based decision-making” or “shared clinical decision-making.”

- YouTube www.youtube.com

On the surface, this sounds reasonable. But while parents have always been free to discuss benefits and risks with their health-care providers to make a decision on what’s best for their child, this change is not based on any new evidence, and it introduces uncertainty into a recommendation that has long been clear.

As a doctor, I am already seeing this uncertainty play out in the clinic. I recently had new parents ask to postpone the hepatitis B vaccine until adolescence because they believed federal health leaders had evidence that people only become infected through sexual activity or contaminated needle use.

After a brief conversation, they came to understand that this was inaccurate — children can be infected not only at birth but also through routine household or child-care exposures, including shared toothbrushes or even a bite that breaks the skin. In the end, they chose to vaccinate, but this experience highlights how easily well-intentioned parents can be misled when guidance is not clear and consistent.

Why the CDC adopted universal hepatitis B shots

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects liver cells, causing inflammation and damage. It is spread through blood and bodily fluids and is easily transmitted from mother to baby during delivery.

The hepatitis B vaccine has been available since the early 1980s. Before 1991, public health guidance recommended giving newborns the hepatitis B vaccine only if they were at high risk of being infected — for example, if they were born to a mother infected with hepatitis B.

That targeted plan failed. Tens of thousands of infants were still infected each year.

Some newborns were exposed when their mothers weren’t screened; others were exposed after their mothers were infected late in pregnancy, after their initial screening. And like any lab test, the screening can have false negative results, be misinterpreted or not be communicated properly to the baby’s care team.

Recognizing these gaps, in 1991 the CDC recommended hepatitis B vaccination for every child starting at birth, regardless of maternal risk.

The U.S. adopted a policy of vaccinating all babies from birth because the number of people with hepatitis B infections was, and remains, relatively high, and because many mothers do not receive prenatal care, so their infections go undetected.

Meanwhile, in some European countries, like Denmark, only babies with certain risk factors receive the vaccine at birth. That’s because in those countries, hepatitis B infections are much less prevalent and pregnant mothers are more widely tested due to universal health care. Due to these differences, that approach is not effective in the United States. In fact, most World Health Organization member countries do recommend a universal birth dose.

Vaccinating at birth

The greatest danger for infants contracting hepatitis B is at birth, when contact with a mother’s blood can transmit the virus. Without preventive treatment or vaccination, 70 percent to 90 percent of infants born to infected mothers will become infected themselves, and 90 percent of those infections will become chronic. The infection in these children silently damages their liver, potentially leading to liver cancer and death.

About 80 percent of parents choose to vaccinate their babies at birth. If parents choose to delay vaccination due to this new recommendation, it will leave babies unprotected during this most vulnerable window, when infection is most likely to lead to chronic infection and silently damage the liver.

A research article published on Dec. 3, 2025, estimates that if only infants born to mothers infected with hepatitis B received the vaccine, an additional 476 perinatal hepatitis B infections would occur each year.

The hepatitis B vaccines used in the U.S. have an outstanding safety record. The only confirmed risk is an allergic reaction called anaphylaxis that occurs in roughly 1 in 600,000 doses, and no child has died from such a reaction. Extensive studies show no link to other serious conditions.

How children get exposed to hepatitis B

Infants and children continue to be vulnerable to hepatitis B long after birth.

Children can become infected through household contacts or in child care settings by exposures as ordinary as shared toothbrushes or a bite that breaks the skin. Because hepatitis B can survive for a week on household surfaces, and many carriers are unaware they are infected, even babies and toddlers of uninfected mothers remained at risk.

Full protection against hepatitis B requires a three-dose vaccine series, given at specific intervals in infancy. Anything short of the full series leaves children vulnerable for life.

In addition to changing the birth dose recommendation, the committee is now advising parents to consult with their health care provider about checking children’s antibody levels after one or two doses of the vaccine to determine whether additional doses are needed. While such testing is sometimes recommended for people in high-risk groups after they get all three doses to confirm their immune system properly responded to the vaccine, it is not a substitute for completing the series.

The recommendation for all babies to receive the vaccine at birth and for infants to complete the full vaccine series is designed to protect every child, including those who slip through gaps in maternal screening or encounter the virus in everyday life. A reversion to the less effective risk-based approach threatens to erode this critical safety net.

  • Portions of this article originally appeared in a previous article published on Sept. 9, 2025.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s alleged 'lewd sex-act' texts with former flame exposed

U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. reportedly texted his former flame, who was a reporter, about a "lewd sex act."

The New York Post over the weekend reported on the alleged texts, which involve ex-reporter Olivia Nuzzi. It's Nuzzi's ex-boyfriend who says the texts exist.

"Not healthy — but certainly a human service. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. once texted disgraced journalist and alleged ex-flame Olivia Nuzzi about a lewd sex-act called 'felching,' according to her jilted ex-fiancé," according to the Post. "Ryan Lizza, 51, claimed he learned about 'felching' only after combing through the salacious text messages and raunchy 'poems' written to Nuzzi from RFK Jr. during their 2023-2024 emotional affair — sarcastically joking 'Thanks Bobby,' in a revelatory article released Saturday."

In another article, the Post reported that, "Robert F. Kennedy Jr. wrote disgraced political reporter Olivia Nuzzi an outrageously raunchy 'poem,' which was dramatically revealed by her ex-fiancé and reporter Ryan Lizza in the second part of his series exposing the secrets of his ethics-challenged ex."

According to the Post's reporting:

“Yr open mouth awaiting my harvest,” Kennedy Jr., the current Secretary of Health and Human Services, wrote to Nuzzi in undated texts recounted by Lizza in a piece published on his Substack early Saturday.

“I mean to squeeze your cheeks to force open your mouth. I’ll hold your nose as you look up at me to encourage you to swallow. ‘Don’t spill a drop.’ I am a river You are my canyon. I mean to flow through you. I mean to subdue and tame you. My Love,” Kennedy allegedly penned to Nuzzi.

The report states, "Lizza coined the poem 'American Canyon' and suggested there were 'many others, too explicit to print.' ('Thanks to Bobby, I am now aware of something called felching.),' Lizza added. Lizza began telling his side of the story after Nuzzi revealed she would be publishing a tell-all about the sordid affair with the once-presidential candidate, titled 'American Canto.'"

Read the full piece here.

Watch: RFK Jr. flees as colleague has medical emergency at White House

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was seen fleeing after he noticed a colleague having a medical emergency at the White House.

During a Thursday Oval Office event on lowering drug costs, one of the presenters appeared to faint. As the man fell to the floor, Kennedy quickly turned and walked away. Meanwhile, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator Mehmet Oz attempted to provide aid.

Kennedy's actions were met with scorn on social media.

"The irony level of a health emergency *during* RFK Jr's press event is going to require some intense scientific instruments to measure," one commenter wrote. "Look at that bronze prune nope the f--- out of there as soon as he saw what was happening."

"Gotta love RFK doing the 'I've got priors' dash out of the room while Trump just stands there like a robot," another person noted. "Incredible omens at the White House today."

"RFK Jr. peacing the f--- out of a medical emergency is the perfect encapsulation of his HHS administration," a comment pointed out.

"Why did RFK run away?? Isn't he supposed to be the health guru?" one person asked.

America faces a 'Weekend at Bernie's' situation with declining Trump: ex-GOP lawmaker

A former House Republican warned Friday that President Donald Trump's cognitive decline reveals "the most dangerous reality" as the president expresses concerns about his own mortality while his "powerful advisers pursue their own agendas" — and that the United States could end up with a "Weekend at Bernie's president."

Former Republican lawmaker and Air National Guard member Adam Kinzinger questioned when this apparent cognitive decline could worsen and what those around him plan to do in a Substack essay.

"The question here is, is this an act, is he really losing his mind, is it both?" Kinzinger said in a Substack video.

"You don't know anymore what's an act, what's real, but I mean, it feels like he's even descended since the beginning of his term," Kinzinger said. "Three years left of this and that's the question so when he does, let's say he does hit a point where he's completely out of it, would there be anybody that had the courage to do the 25th Amendment, so you may ultimately end up with a 'Weekend at Bernie's' president... I just think it's something we need to look at, consider, and think about, having an insane president — I think we have an insane president — but having an insane president that actually can't think because he's lost it."

Kinzinger details the president's most recent comments about heaven.

"How do we know he’s worried? Recently, he’s started talking about his own mortality," Kinzinger writes. "'I want to try and get to heaven, if possible,' he said. 'I’m hearing I’m not doing well. I’m really at the bottom of the totem pole.' On another occasion: 'I don’t think there’s anything going to get me in heaven. I really don’t. I think I’m not maybe heaven-bound.' He’s also begun warning that one day he’ll fall down — the same kind of stumble he once mocked Biden for."

The president might say he's fine, but he actually isn't, said Kinzinger.

" Trump shows visible signs of age-related circulatory issues known as venous insufficiency, which causes swelling in the ankles and bruising on the hands. For a man who’s long claimed to be immune to aging, the visible evidence must be unsettling," Kinzinger wrote.

Trump might be signaling he's aware of what's happening, while he falls deeper into QAnon and conspiratorial territory, including his recent Truth Social post with a fake "med bed."

"These references to heaven and falling suggest an awareness of his own fragility," Kinzinger writes. "The physical decline may not be as worrying as the mental one. His father, Fred Trump Sr., displayed clear signs of dementia years before being diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease — and heredity is a known risk factor. Preventing or slowing such decline requires habits Trump has always resisted: a healthy diet, exercise, and humility."

It also raises questions about the people around him — and how vicious they could be, he adds.

"What does it mean to have a president in visible decline? It means we must watch carefully and hope those around him are competent. In the case of the Israeli–Hamas peace effort, skilled negotiators from the U.S. and abroad did the heavy lifting while Trump played a ceremonial role. A similar pattern is unfolding domestically, where powerful advisers pursue their own agendas." Kinzinger wrote. "Stephen Miller drives the crackdown on immigrants and the push to use the National Guard. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is leading the assault on public health. Russell Vought is overseeing the mass firing of thousands of federal workers."

It's unclear what those around him will ultimately do.

"The truth is, what Donald Trump says matters less than what those behind him do. And that may be the most dangerous reality of all," Kinzinger argues.

‘Trump knows this’: Analysts say this Cabinet member is president's 'biggest threat'

Two analysts say that one politician who has "a cult of his own" represents the biggest threat to President Donald Trump.

Former Republican strategist Rick Wilson and journalist Molly Jong-Fast posited that Trump is afraid of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., his secretary of Health and Human Services, in a live Substack video chat on Wednesday.

"I believe the biggest threat to Trump, and I think Trump knows this, is RFK Jr. Because RFK Jr. has his own constituency," Jong-Fast said.

Others in Trump's inner circle don't actually have a similar following, she argued.

"He has a cult of his own. Whereas no one else does. Everyone else is just trying to out-Trump Trump. Yeah, I don't think there is anybody else in that circle that has the same level of fanaticism that RFK has built," Jong-Fast said.

"And also, RFK wants it," she explained, describing his persistent messaging around autism and Tylenol and suggesting mothers are to blame, plus his anti-vaccine messaging (despite himself and his family getting vaccinated) and "straightforward narrative that appeals to the conspiratorial nature of MAGA. 'I'm going to make sure the food people and the drug people don't poison your children.'"

RFK Jr. adviser warns Trump 'likely shortening his lifespan' with medical treatment

A top aide to Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. shared a theory about what he thinks is causing President Donald Trump's alleged "dementia" and swollen cankles — and how his current medical treatment could be "likely shortening his lifespan."

Dr. Aseem Malhotra, an advisor for the Make America Healthy Again movement and now chief medical and scientific adviser for the Make Europe Healthy Again organization, apparently shared his concerns about Trump's health with the administration as he moved to his new role, The Daily Beast reported Tuesday.

Malhotra is expected to speak at the European Parliament on Wednesday and tell the group "that he believes Trump’s health issues stem from his use of cholesterol-lowering medication called statins, and aspirin," according to The Beast.

Malhotra has previously expressed his controversial anti-COVID-19 vaccine views, along with a long campaign against prescription statins and the dangers of their overuse. In 2022, he grabbed Kennedy's attention and the pair have reportedly become good friends.

Medical experts dispute Malhotra's claims and the British Heart Foundation have called his views "misleading and wrong.”

“In my view President Trump is a remarkable man, almost superhuman to do one of the hardest jobs in the world at his age, but if I was his personal physician I’d want to optimize him even further, and the first step would be to stop his aspirin and the cholesterol lowering medications he’s taking that are likely shortening his lifespan and giving him fatigue,” he will say Wednesday during a livestream, The Beast reports.

He reportedly argues that if Trump stops taking the statins, that his "brain fog" would go away in weeks. Malhotra is apparently so worried about the president's health that he has sent private messages to people in Trump's inner circle.

'OMG I'm dying!' Onlookers gobsmacked as RFK Jr utters latest wild autism claim

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. latest claim of an autism cause left onlookers gobsmacked Thursday/

"There's two studies which show children who are circumcised early have double the rate of autism. It's highly likely because they were given Tylenol," Kennedy said during a cabinet meeting in Washington, D.C.

Last month Kennedy and President Donald Trump stated that autism is tied to Tylenol use among pregnant women. Experts say this contradicts existing scientific research.

Social media users were quick to respond to Kennedy's latest claims.

"'Circumcision causes autism because of Tylenol' is the weirdest MadLib in the history of presidential cabinet meetings," Matt Bennett, Co-founder & EVP for Public Affairs, wrote on X.

"Wut," Republicans against Trump wrote on X.

"Did @RobertKennedyJr just suggest “children who are circumcised early have double the rate of autism” presumably because of Tylenol? Again, throwing out wild unsupported theories — irresponsible," writer Carla Marinucci posted on X.

"He is just making ---- up," Linda Stevens wrote on X.

"Bobby Kennedy just said if you're circumcised, you're more likely to be autistic. OMG, I'm dying. @SecKennedy @WhiteHouse Thank you for this... @nbcsnl," Al Noween wrote on X.

'I feel guilty': Former anti-vaxxers horrified by RFK Jr disaster

When Heather Simpson decided she wanted to become a mother, she began researching healthy lifestyle choices to increase her chances of becoming pregnant.

As she researched, she kept coming across ads for a docuseries called The Truth about Vaccines, so she and her then-husband paid $200 to access the nine-hour series.

“We were hooked,” said Simpson, from Dallas, now mother to an eight-year-old daughter.

Featured in the series was Robert F. Kennedy Jr., founder of Children’s Health Defense, an anti-vaccine advocacy group.

Thanks to famous forebears including his uncle, President John F. Kennedy, and father, former New York senator Robert F. Kennedy, the advocate’s name carried weight.

“I was like, ‘Man, if a Kennedy is saying to be cautious, that's probably something,” Simpson said.

“He was a big part of why I even became anti-vax.”

Kennedy claimed to be “pro-safe vaccines,” but “to me that means anti-vax,” Simpson said.

Simpson quickly went down “the rabbit hole of anti-vaxxers,” becoming an “anti-vax influencer,” even once dressing up as the measles for Halloween, making light of the deadly disease.

Simpson discovered Kennedy in 2016. Nearly a decade later, with President Donald Trump having appointed him to lead the Department of Health and Human Services, parents are increasingly questioning whether to vaccinate their children, medical experts told Raw Story.

As U.S. Health Secretary, Kennedy has hired vaccine skeptics and is considering adding children with autism symptoms into a vaccine injury program, despite decades of evidence debunking the claim that vaccines cause autism.

He’s also cut $500 million of research funding for vaccine development, while his hand-picked vaccine panel has weakened recommendations for the COVID-19 vaccine.

‘It’s gotten worse’

Vaccine skepticism “has been going on a long time,” said Taryn Chapman, a vaccine and infectious disease specialist who runs a website, The Vaccine Mom.

“And of course, it's gotten worse with just things that Kennedy's HHS is putting out there.

“People are a lot more skeptical just because they tend to listen to who ‘the authorities’ are, right? But our authorities aren't really the people that probably should be putting out health information.”

Leslie Treece, a doctor at Cookeville Pediatric Associates in Tennessee, said she had seen an increase in parents not vaccinating their children because “they're scared,” given misinformation “floating around.”

Grandparents are also discouraging parents from vaccinating their grandchildren, Treece said, surmising “political” motivations.

For about 15 years, Treece’s practice has asked parents who don’t vaccinate their children to find another provider.

“We wanted to avoid having people infected with things that are sitting in our waiting room that could potentially kill a newborn or harm one of our patients that's immunocompromised, like some of our patients that are on chemotherapy, that sort of thing,” Treece said.

‘What if I'm wrong?’

In 2020, when COVID struck, Simpson “stood up for masks” to stop the spread of the virus — and promptly lost a lot of followers. She wanted her daughter to be protected, so she reached out to medical specialists, including one who specialized in the blood-brain barrier, the cellular border that protects the brain from viruses and other harmful factors.

“Anti-vaxxers have the theory that … polysorbate 80 [an emulsifier used in vaccines] will open [the blood-brain barrier] up, aluminum will get through it and cause inflammation, resulting in autism,” Simpson said.

The specialists she consulted “basically dismantled those arguments on a cellular level, where I was just like, ‘Well, dang, what if I'm wrong about everything?’”

Simpson kept researching “the actual biology of all of it, not just what people feel,” and slowly became more comfortable with vaccines.

When her daughter was scratched by a feral cat, she went to her doctor.

“I was like, ‘I'm so tired of being scared of tetanus. I wish there was something we could do,’ and the doctor just looked at me, and it was kind of a light-bulb moment, like, ‘What am I doing? There’s the tetanus shot,’” Simpson said.

Now calling herself an “anxious vaccinator,” Simpson started a website, Back to the Vax, with another former anti-vax mom, Lydia Greene.

“I was more of like the crunchy mom, like, ‘Don't let your kids have a cupcake from someone else,’” said Greene, a mother of three and a nurse at a hospital in a small Canadian town.

“Really took it to the extreme and got an eating disorder, and it affected my life quite severely in a lot of ways because I wasn't just anti-vaccine. I was anti-medicine, and I was trying to manage my own health issues with natural medicine, and I made myself quite sick a few times.”

Lydia Greene Lydia Greene, a mother of three and co-founder of Back to the Vax (provided photo)

“Crunchy moms” embrace more natural lifestyles for their families but are also sometimes anti-vaccine.

Today, such parents have found a “hero” in Kennedy and his Make America Healthy Again movement, whose other efforts include eliminating food dyes and restricting purchases of sodas and energy drinks by food stamp recipients.

“I call myself the crunchy apostate,” Greene said, “because I just think, ‘If those things worked, we’d just call them medicine.’

“This isn't a new way of thinking. It's just a rebranding, this MAHA movement. It's always been around, this idea of raw milk or whatever they're doing, bleach enemas. On the darker side, they have like this urine therapy stuff, and it's really bonkers.”

Kennedy has championed raw milk, despite long-established concerns about harmful bacteria otherwise killed by pasteurization.

During his Senate confirmation hearing, Kennedy mentioned chlorine dioxide, a remark celebrated by social media users who think it can cure diseases including autism.

Some anti-vaxxers have advocated drinking urine as a cure for ailments. The medical community warns about the practice.

The perpetuation of such misinformation on social media has “a snowball effect,” Chapman said.

“It's gradually getting worse and worse. I hope that we're not going to be put decades behind with all these diseases coming back because of it.”

‘I hope people smarten up’

Greene said she lived with a “paranoia of toxins” but “never talked about this stuff with people because they would laugh.

“I was never out and that public with it, and now these people have been emboldened to share their message and spread their message. The government officials are saying the same thing, so why should they be afraid to spread this information? It's mainstream now.”

Every week or two, Greene said, she hears from a hesitant parent who wants to discuss vaccines through Back to the Vax — but it feels like “10 to one” how many more people are becoming anti-vax instead.

Simpson said one way anti-vaxxers change their minds is through witnessing local outbreaks like the recent surge of measles cases near Lubbock, Texas, her hometown.

“Once they realize, ‘Oh, this can kill my kid or leave them deaf,” and we can't rely on herd immunity, that was kind of a huge changing or turning point for people,” she said.

Greene said she has most success with convincing people who want to vaccinate but are “scared by people like RFK, who muddied the water.”

“It's not easy when you see the messaging that's out there from top officials,” Greene said.

“What can I say? What can I do? It feels like a train is coming at you, and you can't do anything about it. I hope I'm wrong, and I hope people smarten up before we see this massive consequence to the most innocent people in our society.”

‘Exhausted’

Treece expects a “big pendulum swing” back to vaccines as more outbreaks occur.

“I think if people realized just how horrific some of those things were and could be again, it would change their minds,” she said.

Leslie Treece Leslie Treece, doctor at Cookeville Pediatric Associates (provided photo)

In the meantime, she said pediatric resident doctors will start needing to learn skills like spinal taps, which have rarely been needed given the near-elimination of meningitis in the US, due to vaccinations.

“Given enough time and enough of a population for those things to circulate in, we're going to have to learn how to treat these things again,” Treece said.

As herd immunity fades, with more unvaccinated people, Greene said she expects stakes as high as death will be needed to persuade some anti-vaxxers to change their minds.

“The only way this is going to change is when kids start dying, and they're going to die in high enough numbers where you know a kid that ended up with horrible brain damage or death because of a vaccine-preventable disease,” Greene said.

“It's not even six degrees of separation anymore.”

As a healthcare professional, Greene said she’s “exhausted” watching the resurgence of even “old-timey” diseases like tuberculosis.

“There's some kind of karmic justice maybe for me in that I wished this would happen when I was an anti-vaxxer, and now I'm watching it play out, and it's a disaster, and I feel guilty a little,” Greene said.

“There's just something poetic, almost, or ironic, about this happening right after I figured out that I was very wrong about it. It’s hard to stay positive.”

These sinister rants show Trumpworld isn't mourning — it's unleashed

Everyone who follows politics from any sort of middle ground suffered comprehensive dread after Donald Trump's second election. We knew of Project 2025 and its "in your face" drive toward totalitarianism. It was baked in — a guarantee.

The nightmare unspooled as it became all too clear that Trump's new administration wouldn't tolerate minders, deep thinkers, the conscientious. There would be no adults in the room. Trump presented a cabinet of laughably unqualified "loyalists" and America pretended it was normal. Expected as it was, the foreboding was no less real.

However, the last 10 days have taken matters to a new level — one even more extreme, perhaps planned all along, but now most definitely here.

Charlie Kirk's murder, along with some admittedly heartless responses, ushered in a new phase, one for which Trumpworld may have been planning all along, but now set upon us over days. In so doing, they ushered in near zoo-level incompetence from a cabinet picked for loyalty despite abject incompetence. The "in your face" aggression, coupled with newfound confidence, brought about the most dangerous week yet in Trump 2.0.

The White House is emboldened, using Kirk's assassination to unapologetically twist the dial, more aggressively crazed than ever. This is dangerous.

The most obvious newly evolving move is the labeling of the entire left as a terrorist movement that threatens American stability. This is gaslighting so pure as to be almost elegant, coming as it does from terrorists who attacked our Capitol. Opposition to Trump has become that much more dangerous. And if one listens closely, they almost took joy in the killing as leaving them finally "freed." What an opportunity.

Stephen Miller, never more self-righteous and raw, the most openly authoritarian-racist member of the administration, recently said:

"With God as my witness, we are going to use every resource we have at the Department of Justice, Homeland Security and throughout this government to identify, disrupt, dismantle, and destroy these networks, and make America safe again for the American people. It will happen, and we will do it in Charlie’s name."

Sorry, but that sounds less like grief than relief.

There are no left-wing networks. As a member of the Democratic Party, I'd say we probably need more and better-defined networks to spread an anti-Trump message, but they don't yet exist. Not as Miller meant.

No matter, Miller wants an excuse to "attack" the left, wanting to spring loose the semi-fascist brownshirts in Homeland Security and National Guard on anyone they don't like. Breathtaking in its boldness, one can feel his rush to rage-filled hatred, ready for an open-field run.

Watch out.

But Miller is only following the example set at the top. Trump has been all over the place, spitting vitriol at the left, using Kirk's death to go next-level. Post-Kirk, he has a treasured launching pad toward Orwellian control, example "A" being Jimmy Kimmel. Emboldened, Trump went after even bigger game — network news, as evidenced by recent interactions with the media, as reported by Politico:

President Donald Trump on Friday reiterated his claim that critical television coverage of him is “illegal” and pushed back on criticisms that his administration was taking actions that chill free speech.

The administration quickly established the fact-free narrative that the left metaphysically groomed the suspect in the Kirk killing, Tyler Robinson, despite all evidence pointing to an isolated, uniquely sick loner, practically apolitical, a young man who simply hated Kirk's intolerance toward LGBTQ Americans. Hardly a political leftist.

But the idea took hold on the right, an excuse to attack all opposition as terrorists threatening Americans. This is as dangerous as it is self-serving.

Meanwhile, the cabinet seemed newly confident, and with increased energy came new evidence of jaw-dropping incompetence. None is in over their head more than FBI Director Kash Patel. Little more than a flame-throwing podcaster, he appeared in front of Congress backed by a new level of anti-left rage, and promptly humiliated himself as the most hapless, fully politicized, and laughable FBI director in history. As noted by USA Today:

During his equally contentious Sept. 16 hearing before a Senate committee, Patel went off the rails, labeling [Sen. Adam] Schiff “a political buffoon at best” and saying, “You are the biggest fraud to ever sit in the United States Senate.”

Try to imagine Fox News's reaction to a Democratic administration, or simply a normal FBI director, trying that. Despite almost non-existent expectations, Patel managed to still surprise as a newly freed, shameless, hapless, moron. This, of course, after erroneously announcing the arrest of a “subject” in the Kirk killing.

It goes on, even down to the Department of Health and Human Services and Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s absurd crusade against vaccines — the single most powerful public health tool in history, short perhaps of proper sewerage. But conspiracy freaks are going to freak, and the "post-science experts" at a key CDC meeting devolved into clueless chaos.

Per a report in The New York Times:

“Thursday’s session ended with the panel members at odds. A hot microphone caught one panelist calling another committee member 'an idiot,' although it was unclear who was speaking.”

Take your pick.

True, the administration was always vicious, uncaring, and self-satisfied, but it went to a new and dangerous level prior to even Charlie Kirk's memorial service at an NFL stadium in Phoenix. State control and censorship reached late-night comedy, leaving those left on air quivering. All over mildly disrespectful talk — but only talk.

It is likely that the plotters in Project 2025 counted on some seminal moments all along, using each to tighten their grip. They surely envisioned protests, some perhaps descending into violence as their launch pad to the next level. Instead, they are rallying around two grotesque but extremely isolated killings: Kirk as "proof" that political violence is the province of the left, and the murder of Iryna Zarutska, a Ukrainian immigrant, as "proof" that white people are under attack. That incident in Charlotte, North Carolina lubricated a shift to more surface-level racism — always useful to the right.

It all worked better than they could have hoped, and they're showing it with barely suppressed excitement.

The pattern was set in January. Perhaps even ahead of schedule, it is now viciously in your face — a government that is authoritarian, post-law, post-decency, post-unity, in what were the United States. They always fantasized about a war within. Now they get to move, seeing themselves as blameless, responding to a first shot, one taken by "all" Trump opposition. How useful.

MAGA provides its voters self-identity. It's not what they believe. It is shared hatred, never more acute, thus never more united, never more willing to quash all that previously made America great. Those charged with leadership don't need to be good, only "committed."

Unfortunately, the impact will be felt as they move with a greater sense of mission, greater hatred, less confusion, and more dopamine. Never forget: they hate you more than any international faction on earth, more than all of them put together.

Now, though, they have a theme — they're under attack by a violent resistance as a whole. Tragic as one young man's senseless killing may be, they seem more fulfilled, even relieved to have a tragedy transition to a precious tool, never on clearer display than the last week.

And it is just so f–––––– dangerous.

Don't believe me? Listen to them.

“Stephen Miller understands the assignment,” Laura Loomer wrote on Sunday. “Many others don’t. Crush. The. Left. So they never rise again.”

  • Jason Miciak is a former Associate Editor at Occupy Democrats, author, and American attorney. He can also regularly be found on Politizoom.

One dangerous agent of Trumpist chaos is creating a tragedy to last decades

Donald Trump’s appointee as secretary of health and human services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., has set out to dismantle an Atlanta-based institution, attempting to transform the Centers for Disease Control, the planet’s pre-eminent public-health agency, into the Centers for Deluded Conspiracy, an official purveyor of pseudo-science and quackery.

And those with the power to stop Kennedy’s assault on the CDC lack the courage and wisdom to do so, while those who do have the courage to act lack the power to intervene. As a result, we are witnessing a tragedy play out before our eyes that will have consequences for decades.

If that sounds alarmist, let’s review who we’re dealing with in Kennedy.

In the not-too-distant past, he has suggested that the COVID-19 pandemic was a “plandemic,” created by the pharmaceutical industry to drum up business for itself, with the CDC serving as the industry’s enforcer.

It’s a familiar line of thinking for Kennedy, an echo of his earlier conspiracy theory that the attacks on the World Trade Center in 1993 and 2001 may have plotted by the U.S. defense industry so it could keep selling arms and munitions.

Kennedy has said that there is no such thing as a safe and effective vaccine. He has said that the polio vaccine has killed more people than it has saved. He has suggested that COVID-19 was “targeted” to kill certain ethnic groups, such as white and Black people, while making Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese immune. He also insists that vaccines and Tylenol cause autism, theories that are utterly without scientific basis.

Trump himself, the man who suggested that we could fight COVID by injecting bleach into our veins or letting the sun shine into places in our body where God did not intend the sun to shine, posted a vaccine-related meme this week on his Truth Social account claiming: “They’re ALL poison. Every. Single. One.”

Given their unquestioning faith in their leader, a lot of Trump supporters will probably be even more reluctant now to be vaccinated, or to allow their children to do so, and that will have consequences for them. But again, when powerful national leaders make health care policy based on such nonsense, even those of us who know better will pay a heavy price.

Living and working in Atlanta, I’ve met a lot of CDC employees. They are smart, they are honest, they are dedicated to science and to the mission of public health. Many have sacrificed more lucrative career paths because they wanted to be at the CDC, where so much important work was being done.

Imagine being someone like that and you’re told that to keep your job you have to pretend that vaccines do more damage than good, and other such nonsense. For a lot of CDC employees, they don’t have to imagine that scenario because they are living it.

In recent testimony to the U.S. Senate, Kennedy was asked why he had just fired Susan Monarez as CDC director, after just four weeks in the job.

“I told her that she had to resign because when I asked her whether she was a trustworthy person, and she said no,” Kennedy told the senators.

Somehow, I doubt that’s how the conversation actually went down. It seems far more likely that Kennedy asked Monarez whether she could be trusted to spew the pseudo-science that Kennedy demanded. When she refused, as integrity demanded, she was fired.

Monarez holds a doctorate in immunology and microbiology, with a long career of research into infectious diseases and other public-health issues. Her replacement as acting director of the CDC, Jim O’Neill, has a master’s degree in the humanities, but apparently Kennedy considers him “trustworthy.”

It’s easy to see why. Like Kennedy, O’Neill champions the use of ivermectin, a horse dewormer, to treat COVID. He believes that the government should allow the sale of unproved drugs and other treatments so that people can experiment on their own to find out if they work or not. Yeah, they may die unnecessarily, but it’s not the government’s job to protect them from such choices.

There have always been people who prefer to live in an alternate reality of their own design, as Kennedy, O’Neill and others do. We saw that at the peak of the pandemic, when some individuals stubbornly rejected the vaccine and medical science in favor of quack remedies such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.

It was their choice, and many died as a result.

But now, in our era of national madness, we have surrendered control of major agencies of the federal government to such people, not just at the CDC but at the Pentagon, the Department of State, the Department of Commerce and the Department of Justice.

Now all of us are living in their alternate reality. Now all of us are at risk when actual reality reasserts itself, as it always does eventually. We can’t know what form that challenge will take, but we do know it will come, and the charlatans and conspiracy fools that we now have in charge will prove spectacularly unfit to meet it.

  • Jay Bookman covered Georgia and national politics for nearly 30 years for the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, earning numerous national, regional and state journalism awards. He has been awarded the National Headliner Award and the Walker Stone Award for outstanding editorial writing, and is the only two-time winner of the Pulliam Fellowship granted by the Society of Professional Journalists. He is also the author of "Caught in the Current," published by St. Martin's Press.

Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Raw Story Investigates and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.