RawStory
RawStory

All posts tagged "white house"

Trump 'turning White House into Mar a Lago' with renovation plan: analysis

Donald Trump is converting the White House into Mar a Lago, according to a political commentator who broke down the president's biggest blunders this year.

Mikey Smith, writing in The Mirror, believes the president is "fighting the old wars of 2020" and attempting to convert as much of the White House as he can into a place that more closely resembles his Florida resort. Trump has spent much of his time at Mar a Lago during the first year of his second term, often giving briefings from the golf club, rather than the Oval Office.

Smith wrote, "A year into his second term in office, polls make him the second most unpopular President of all time. He's spending most of his time fighting the old wars of 2020, punishing his enemies and remodelling the White House to more closely resemble Mar A Lago. He schmoozes America's enemies and alienates her allies."

But it's the renovation work which Trump has carried out not just on the East Wing of the White House, but to the interior decorations, that is a sign of concern.

Smith added, "The new ballroom is just part of a gradual process throughout the year to turn the White House into Mar a Lago. Every time the Oval Office was on TV, there was a fresh gold (painted) sconce or detail somewhere."

"The art deco bathroom in the "Lincoln bedroom" was torn out to make way for the kind of polished marble monstrosity one only sees in a building that either has Trump in it or written on the outside."

"He paved over the rose garden to put a patio out there to match the one at his Florida resort - inviting Republicans over for dinner and glad-handing on late summer evenings. Even the two enormous flagpoles he installed on the White House lawn were identical to one he has in Palm Beach."

Future projects which could see the president's administration refresh the Eisenhower Building have led to Trump being hit with a lawsuit by preservation groups.

The suit has asked the US District Court for the District of Columbia to stop Trump and other federal officials from making any changes to the Eisenhower Executive Office Building before the potential changes are assessed in a standard review process. Judge Dabney L. Friedrich is, according to The Washington Post, expected to rule on this request.

Heller said, "GSA will not authorize or engage in the physical actions of power washing/cleaning, painting, or repointing the Eisenhower Executive Office Building before Dec. 31, 2025." Work on other parts of the White House, such as the East Wing, began earlier this year.

Trump could shake up inner circle by drafting in 'MAGA officials': analysis​

Donald Trump's inner circle could be set for a shake-up, according to political analysts warning "MAGA officials" could be the norm next year.

CBS chief Washington analyst Robert Costa believes change is on the way, with many MAGA-friendly representatives shortlisted for slots in government which could open up. Costa said, "[Trump] doesn’t like to be pressured to get rid of anybody. But there are so many people in the so-called MAGA universe who want these slots, and they are able to get access to these officials."

"I wouldn't rule anything out, based on my reporting." Fellow senior White House reporter Jennifer Jacobs believes there will be some "senior advisers" swapped out of the West Wing in favour of new faces. She said, "I think we will see some senior advisers in the West Wing leave."

The CBS News reporter suggested the "main pack" of Trump's inner circle will likely remain - Chief of Staff Susie Wiles and Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, and Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt - but there could be sweeping changes elsewhere, The Daily Beast reported.

Shortcomings and scandals from administration members were highlighted by the outlet, which suggested both FBI Director Kash Patel and Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem could be on their way out.

Patel's alleged departure from the Federal Bureau of Investigations has been long-rumored, following the release of an insider dossier released earlier this month.

Rumours of Patel's imminent departure from his role at the top of the Federal Bureau of Investigation were reported by Salon, who spoke with FBI sources. The mood in the department is, according to one unnamed source, not positive for Patel. A 30-year veteran of the FBI says morale is at an "all-time low" and suggested the trouble is "at the top" of the FBI.

An insider said, "Nobody here will miss him. He has no credibility." The White House has denied any plan to replace Patel as director of the FBI. White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson told the outlet, "President Trump has full confidence in his entire law enforcement and justice team."

Pressure on Patel comes as a former federal prosecutor says the FBI head is making the same mistakes constantly. Glenn Kirschner said, "It looks like FBI Director Kash Patel is either unwilling or unable to learn from his mistakes because in yet another high-profile shooting, old Kash just got it wrong again."

Photographer reveals how White House Epstein panic scrambled now-infamous photo shoot

The photographer who illustrated last week's bombshell Vanity Fair profile of President Donald Trump's inner circle revealed that his photo shoot was scrambled by the Jeffrey Epstein scandal.

The West Wing profile featured remarkably candid quotes from White House chief of staff Susie Wiles and unvarnished portraits by Christopher Anderson, and he gave the magazine a behind-the-lens account of his tightly choreographed day at the White House, reported The Daily Beast.

"There were interesting moments during the day," Anderson said. "For instance, at one point our schedule — we spent the entire day there and we had scheduled moments with each one of the players throughout the day in their office to take the pictures — and at one point in the middle of the day the schedule got completely thrown off because we were told that the Cabinet had been called to the Situation Room."

At first, he assumed a military operation was underway, but Anderson soon realized it was a political battle related to the Epstein case.

"It was, you know, we wonder if the Situation Room is used when things like going to war are taking place," Anderson said. "So we, together with the Vanity Fair team, were speculating while we were waiting for what could possibly be happening. We later found out that day that it was Congresswoman Lauren Boebert who had been called into the Situation Room to put pressure on her about not pushing to release the Epstein files, so to speak. That was an interesting one."

The photographer's account confirms a reported pressure campaign against the Colorado congresswoman and other renegade Republicans who intended to sign a discharge petition to Republican “rebels” who were backing a discharge petition to

The 79-year-old president, a longtime associate of Epstein, invited Boebert to the White House meeting, which the White House described as a briefing, along with Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel.

Anderson's account shows the meeting was focused on her decision to sign the discharge petition circulated by Reps. Thomas Massie (R-KY) and Ro Khanna (D-CA) to force the Department of Justice to release investigative files about Epstein and his network.

However, the effort ultimately failed, and the House voted 427-1 to pass the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which Trump signed into law the next day after it also passed the Senate.

The DOJ has been releasing documents since Friday in effort to comply with the law.

Leaked chats show ICE agents pressured to make viral video of immigrant raids

President Donald Trump's White House pressured Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers to quickly produce social media videos — all in a push to try and score viral hits, a report claimed Tuesday.

The Washington Post revealed a series of internal chats, leaked to the outlet, that suggested ICE's media relations office was urged by the president's officials to pump out videos while immigration raids ramped up across the U.S.

"For years, this ICE team had run like a routine government communications shop, dispensing public service announcements and news releases few Americans would see. But during President Donald Trump’s second term, ICE’s public affairs arm has rapidly transformed into an influencer-style media machine, churning out flashy videos of tactical operations and immigration raids," The Post reported.

ICE's public affairs team started recording more in the field day and night, joining officers during raids and actions to remove people from their homes, work and public spaces.

"Any video producer who witnessed a particularly cinematic scene was expected to alert their supervisors, so the agency and the White House could promote it on their social media channels," according to The Post. "Employees on ICE’s 'digital engagement' team then raced to edit and post the footage on social media in hopes of securing a viral win."

The agency's team of video content creators contracted other influencers — often questioning if the administration knew they were a small squad given the demand for output.

"In pursuit of more viral video, DHS brought in new public affairs staff members with atypical backgrounds and authorized them to 'go out and capture content,' as a chat message said. A MAGA women’s lifestyle influencer, an L.A.-based wedding videographer and a Canadian-born actor who played a 'mountain man' in a cable-TV show joined the team," according to The Post.

David Lapan, who was DHS press secretary during the first Trump administration and a retired Marine Corps colonel, has argued that the agency has abandoned its “professional and buttoned-up” image.

“We were supposed to present the facts, not hype things up. But this veers into propaganda, into creating fear,” Lapan said. “We didn’t have this meme-ification of various serious operations, these things that are life or death. … It’s not a joking matter. But that’s the way they’re treating it now.”

ICE has also used music from artists — without licensing the songs or getting permission — which has come under fire from several artists, including Sabrina Carpenter and even Pokémon.

"Some officials said in the chat that they were indifferent to the potential perils. When one employee raised concerns about copyright violations, another wrote back, dismissing them," The Post reported.

The strategy has stemmed from the White House's eagerness to show off its "immigrant arrests and confrontations to portray its push for mass deportation as critical to protecting the American way of life."

Videos have shown these moments to try and drum up support for the aggressive policies, the report stated.

"The internal communications reviewed by The Post show how the ICE team has coordinated with the White House, working to satisfy Trump aides’ demands to 'flood the airwaves,' as one official urged in the messages, with brash content showing immigrants being chased, grabbed and detained," the outlet reported.

"They also show federal officials mocking immigrants in crass terms and discussing video edits that might help legitimize the administration’s aggressive stance. The team also knowingly used copyright-protected music without permission from the rights holders, among other techniques designed to boost their online attention," according to The Post.

Trump alarms with move to grab DC golf courses: 'Thinks of government property as his own'

A proposed overhaul of the Washington, D.C. golf scene has been opposed by those who believe President Donald Trump "thinks of government property as his own."

The president is expected to make a move on the golf courses in the capital, a project unfavorably compared to Trump's remodeling of the White House. Democratic Party representative Jamie Raskin says a takeover of the golf system in D.C. is further evidence to Trump claiming government buildings as his own property.

Rep. Raskin, speaking to The Hill, said, "That ambition is reflective of a kingly approach to his job. He thinks government property belongs to him … it reflects the same mentality as bulldozing the East Wing. I haven’t heard anyone in the District, Maryland or Virginia say what the area needs is some Trump-run golf courses."

Raskin had previously led an impeachment of Trump in the president's first term, and now he is warning that Trump is controlling more and more of the federal government directly.

Charles Allen, a member of the D.C. council, is concerned with Trump's interest and possible involvement in a takeover of the D.C. golfing parks. He said, "These are historic, important public courses that have a rich history of affordability and access."

"It concerns me to have the Trump administration terminate the lease for, let’s be honest, made-up reasons," Allen continued. "It seems to be about a grab of the land for the wealthy and well connected."

"We may be in a very difficult situation depending on which route the Trump administration takes on this," the councilman added. "I think our attorney general is going to be looking at all options if there is any recourse for the district. But again the termination of a lease that everyone has worked on for so long would be really devastating."

Comparisons between Trump's attempted grab at golfing in D.C. and remodeling of the White House comes as the president is sued over the future plans for the Eisenhower Building.

A plan to coat the Eisenhower Executive Office Building with white paint has horrified leading experts in the DC Preservation League, who were part of a lawsuit filed against Trump's rapid remodeling plans. League spokesperson Rebecca Miller argued Trump had been treating the White House as his "personal portfolio".

Greg Werkheiser, one of the lawyers who filed the lawsuit, has said the issue is not in Trump's plan, but in how he wants to make the sweeping changes to historic buildings.

Werkheiser said, "Paint traps moisture, ruins the mortar, weakens and cracks the rock." Trump's wish to repaint the Eisenhower Executive Office Building was confirmed in an earlier statement from the president, where he shared his desire to change the "ugly building."

Trump's contempt is confirmed by this rising obscenity

The White House has always mattered because of what it represents. It was never supposed to be a palace; it was meant to be the people’s house, a physical reminder that power in America is borrowed, temporary, and accountable.

That’s why the news that Donald Trump is turning it into a $400 million monument to himself should stop every American cold.

This isn’t a routine renovation. What Trump first floated as a ballroom has ballooned into a massive two-story complex with sweeping staircases, private residential quarters, and a secure bridge connecting it directly to the presidential residence.

Streets around the White House will be shut down for years. Historic gardens are being ripped out. A magnolia planted by Franklin Roosevelt in 1942 is gone. Jackie Kennedy’s legacy is treated like landscaping debris.

And this thing won’t just sit on the White House grounds: according to the National Park Service, it will dominate them. It visually overwhelms the West Wing and the Executive Mansion.

That detail matters. Symbols matter. And this symbol screams something Trump has been telling us for years. In his mind, this country isn’t about shared sacrifice or common good, it’s about power, spectacle, and who gets to live above the law and above the rest of us.

While Trump is building himself a palace, millions of Americans are deciding whether they can afford to see a doctor. Parents are cutting pills in half. Seniors are rationing insulin.

Working people are drowning under rent, groceries, student loans, and insurance premiums that climb every year. We’re told health care just wasn’t meant to be, that there’s no money for universal care, no money to make life affordable, no money to help people survive.

Funny how there’s always money for marble, steel, and ego when Trump (or any other dictator, anywhere in the world) is running the show. This is how authoritarianism announces itself, and he’s not even trying to be subtle about it.

Strongmen don’t just seize power, they remake the landscape to reflect it. They build grand halls and private corridors, while separating themselves physically and psychologically from the public. They hang huge banners with their faces on them from public buildings.

And now he’s even slapping his name on the Kennedy Center. It’s obscene.

Look around the world and you’ll see the pattern repeated again and again of civic spaces turn into monuments and humble government buildings becoming fortresses. Leaders of this type — if you could call them “leaders” instead of “tinpot dictators” — stop walking among the people and start hovering above them.

Trump isn’t inventing anything new. He’s following a playbook as old as the Egyptian pharaohs and the Roman emperors.

The “secure bridge” to gain access to the building from the White House residence alone tells you everything you need to know. This is about insulation, about never having to mix with the public, about power flowing smoothly behind locked doors and away from protest, dissent, and accountability.

A president who believes in democracy doesn’t need that, but a president who fears or even hates the people — but craves the wealth and power a corrupt Supreme Court has said he can grab at will — does.

The White House was intentionally modest by design: it was a rebuke to kings and emperors. The White House’s first residents — John Adams and Thomas Jefferson — refused to live like royalty because they understood that democracy depends on restraint. Jefferson used to answer the front door in his pajamas.

Trump understands the opposite. He believes any symbol of his own personal power should look expensive, imposing, and permanent, like Trump Tower and his gaudy golf motels. That’s why this project matters far beyond architecture: it’s a declaration of values.

And notice what had to be erased to make room for it. Historic gardens. Living symbols of past presidents who believed in stewardship rather than self-glorification.

Authoritarian types like Trump and Putin don’t preserve history, they overwrite it. They don’t see themselves as part of a long democratic story, but instead put themselves at the center of it.

There’s a lawsuit now from the National Trust for Historic Preservation, pointing out the obvious, that no president gets to tear apart the White House without review. Not Trump. Not anyone.

Yet a federal judge appears ready to let it move forward, asking only that designs be submitted after the fact. That’s how democratic guardrails weaken. Excess becomes normalized, deference replaces oversight, and power gets a pass because Trump insists he’s a special boy.

This is what Americans are reacting to, even if they don’t always have the language for it. People feel the imbalance in their bones.

They hear Republicans telling them to tighten their belts while loosening their own and those of the morbidly rich who own them. They see suffering framed as unavoidable while luxury is treated as destiny. They understand, instinctively, that something is deeply wrong when a president builds himself a palace while calling unrealistic things like feeding the hungry, housing the homeless, and providing healthcare to the people.

This moment matters because of what it reveals about the direction Republicans and the morbidly rich are taking our country. A democracy is supposed to make power feel smaller than the people, as the old quote usually misattributed to Jefferson notes:

“When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.”

Trump wants to make power seem untouchable and the people to fear him and his masked goons.

This isn’t about taste or aesthetics. It’s about whether America remains a republic or slides toward something darker. When leaders wall themselves off, elevate themselves physically above the public, and replace shared civic symbols with personal monuments, history warns us where that road leads.

The White House belongs to We, the People.

Every garden, every hallway, every inch of it exists because this country has repeatedly, for over 250 years, rejected kings. Turning it into a private palace while Americans are told to accept illness, debt, and precarity as fate isn’t just obscene, it’s a warning.

Democracies don’t collapse in a single moment. They erode as excess is excused and power forgets who it serves. This project is Trump saying the quiet part out loud: He’s not here to govern with us, he’s here to rule above us.

And Americans are right to reject that.

This ferocious assault is appalling — but it will ruin Trump too

Last month, Donald Trump explained away his hoarse voice by saying he “blew his stack” shouting at stupid people. He must have been looking at himself in the mirror — and if he was, there’s no doubt that mirror cracked.

Not only because of Trump’s shrillness, but because of the reflection that poor mirror was forced to provide. His slipping visage and voice are at once offensive and burdensome, and both appear to be creeping into a presbyphonic (shorter version, “old”) and crass articulation.

It’s emblematic of how Trump brings everything down around him. Everything Trump faces, and speaks about, ends up in disarray, decay, and disillusionment — including tariffs, affordability, immigration policy, and health care. Even the Kennedy Center, which is losing money, its reputation, and the talent it hosts, is having its name besmirched, cracking apart its foundation.

That majestic building on the Potomac, which glimmers, sings, and dances at night, now has an ominous pall that reflects the darkness and destruction of Trump.

Across the river, what will Trump tear down to build his abominable “Trump’s Arch?” It's modeled on Paris’s Arc de Triomphe. It would be a colossal blight on the Potomac, designed less to honor the republic than to glorify Trump through some sort of warped military pageantry.

And perhaps most obviously, how Trump brought down the East Wing of the White House. A wrecking ball smashing history, having already obliterated Jackie Kennedy’s garden, to build his vulgar ballroom. Trump’s obsession with the most glamorous first couple in history is stupefying.

Having already fired the first architect of his monstrous imperial symbol, Trump will most assuredly find a way to seize for himself supposed private funds toward the construction. That means it will be done on the cheap, cracking apart at the first sign of a summer storm.

Trump’s demolition derby marches on.

On the West Wing colonnade this week, he unveiled what he calls “presidential plaques,” bronze declarations masquerading as history, heavy with lies, distortions, and mockery of his predecessors. They are not commemorations; they are accusations, bolted into place, bringing down any semblance of decency and decorum the Colonnade demands, and Trump defaces.

Inside the Oval Office, the walls groan under gold. Gold moldings, gold flourishes, frames, gold gifts, gold clocks, gold trophies, a gold fake peace prize, everywhere, ornament layered upon ornament layered until there is no white space left to breathe.

The room no longer signals restraint or a republic’s modesty. Now, it signals repulsive regalness. The walls of the revered, most storied office in the world, sagging under the heaviness of the ogreish Trump.

The White House is shaking under the weight.

This is not just about aesthetics or temperament. It is about what happens when a country’s symbolic center is subjected to the same forces as its politics: overload, distortion, anger, retribution, ego, usurpation, commandeering, and intimidation. Walls are meant to hold. Space is meant to clarify. Plaques are meant to tell the truth. When they do the opposite, when they strain under falsehoods, when they exist to erase rather than remember, the structure weakens.

Then comes the raging screams of Trump’s address to the nation this week. It was not merely aggrieved; it was violent in tone. Not violent in the sense of physical action, but in the way a feeble old man tries to cling to a truth that no longer exists. It was the sound of pressure without release, of a desperate attempt to justify power. It was a disgrace.

The unabated noise of lashing out was, metaphorically, cracking the walls in the place where he gave the speech, the Diplomatic Reception Room in the White House, the already strained walls holding a seemingly unbearable clutter of Christmas branches and decorations.

History offers warnings about leaders who scream at nations, collapse historic venues, and build monuments to themselves.

Adolf Hitler famously fulminated and roared at the German people, turning volume into insipid authority and fury into authoritarian inevitability. He, too, dreamed of tearing down walls, of demolishing the existing city to make room for a monumental new capital, “Germania,” a world city scaled to fantasy and domination.

Vast swaths of Berlin were marked for destruction to clear space for colossal buildings designed to awe and dwarf the individual. In the end, very little was built. The screaming came first, the ruins came later.

This is not to say America is Germany in the 1930s. History does not repeat so neatly. But it does rhyme, especially when leaders substitute shouting for persuasion and monument-building for legitimacy. When power fixates on grandiosity and extravagance, it is often compensating for instability, and in this case massive insecurity, beneath the surface.

Trump’s White House tells that story in physical form. Gold layered until it crumples. Plaques hung until they bend under the weight of untruth. Cranes, excavators, and bulldozers, trashing history. And a voice, strained, cracking, and blowing its stack, demanding that the country follow under its weight.

As a nation, we are being commanded to live inside Trump’s decibel-breaking noise, with no pause for introspection, and no room for facts that do not flatter Trump’s power. Institutions are now more like set pieces of a horror film, history like aluminum, easily disposed of.

Buildings, like democracies, can bear only so much ornament before the structure begins to fail. They can endure only so much added weight before stress fractures appear. The same is true of a country asked to carry lies as if they were foundational facts. When that foundation tremors and the walls start trembling, the fault lies with what was piled upon them.

'Start contempt proceeding': Internet erupts over Trump admin stalling Epstein files drop

The internet erupted on Friday after House Oversight Democrats warned of legal action against the Trump administration over trying to cover up the Jeffrey Epstein files.

In a joint statement from Oversight ranking members Robert Garcia (D-CA) and Jamie Raskin (D-MD), the lawmakers said that President Donald Trump's administration and Attorney General Pam Bondi more specifically were violating federal law after attempting to conceal facts and evidence about the deceased child abuser Jeffrey Epstein. The files were slated to be released Friday, which the Department of Justice was legally mandated to do.

Social media users had immediate reactions to the news:

"Legal note: Immediate go to court to start contempt proceeding," Abraham Stein, advocate for seniors, wrote on X.

"WHY ARE THEY OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE?? @realDonaldTrump @PamBondi @FBIDirectorKash," TJ Adams-Falconer, former President Barack Obama aide and U.S. House of Representative candidate for California's new District 38, wrote on X.

"Don’t move the goal post. Hold them accountable today," user Danny Hulse wrote on X.

"Trump clearly guilty, why would he go to such lengths to avoid releasing the Epstein Files if they were so damming to the Dems?" User Luca Migo wrote on Bluesky.

"Well, we suspected this would happen. I remember watching the survivors speaking at the White House. The lawyers mentioned that if the survivors agree, they would release the files. Why can’t that happen?" Noreen Folan Essenberg wrote on Bluesky.

"IMHO, the ranking members should have been examining options well before now..." user Mickey Hodges wrote on Bluesky.

Trump 'tantrums' and 'impulsiveness' has delayed White House ballroom by 'years': analysis

Constant delays to the White House ballroom are being caused by Donald Trump's "tantrums" and "impulsiveness", a political commentator has claimed.

The president made his plans for the $200million turned $400million ballroom project known in July this year, but the renovation has hit more than a few snags. Trump has been hit by more than one lawsuit regarding his changes to the White House and surrounding buildings, and the head architect of his proposed East Wing renovation quit earlier this year.

It is hardly the best start for Trump's plan, which columnist Amanda Marcotte believes is the president's only chance to leave his legacy in the White House. Trump's initial plan for the ballroom has expanded, and as such, the project has been delayed.

Marcotte, writing in Salon, suggested, "Trump keeps changing things, driven by a short-sighted impulsiveness that keeps pushing him to expand the scope of the project. Initially, it was supposed to seat 650 people in 90,000 square feet, but he kept throwing tantrums about how he wanted it bigger."

"The projected price tag has already ballooned from $200 million to $400 million, but those numbers have almost no meaning since they don’t correlate to any plans that would generate an estimate."

Marcotte added that the changes made to other parts of the White House, including a "presidential walk of fame" would be removed quickly by his successor.

She wrote, "While talking up the ballroom project, his actual renovations of the White House have only been destructive, like demolishing the East Wing. Others are so flimsy and gaudy that they will be gone by the end of the first day of the next president."

"This attempt by Trump to leave his mark is destined for the trash heap, probably before 3 p.m. on Jan. 20, 2029. He’s restarted weak efforts to pretend he’ll just take an illegal third term, but his apparent poor health and exhaustion leaves most wondering if he’ll be able to make it through the second."

"Efforts to force a lasting legacy are maddening, but ultimately, they will fail. Trump will be felled by the worthlessness he’s spent a lifetime trying to conceal with cheap parlor tricks, because he’s incapable of making a true, lasting contribution."

'More anxious': Republicans in panic mode after Trump's lackluster address backfires

Republicans were shocked by President Donald Trump's finger-pointing and have questioned what's next after his lackluster primetime speech.

White House insiders and GOP lawmakers were reacting to responses to Trump's speech, CNN senior White House correspondent Kristen Holmes told viewers Thursday.

"Look, they're all watching everything closely, and they've seen how it's been reviewed. I will say one thing. The White House worked together as a team, as they often do the inner circle to craft this speech. And they needed a speech in which President Trump would stay on message, that was short, that addressed the economy," Holmes said.

Trump blamed former President Joe Biden, a common move he's made in the past — something his team has begged him to stop doing — and tried to say the economy was better than before.

"Now, whether or not you think his message was true, we obviously know that there were numbers that were inflated or just plain wrong. Or if you think that he went off topic, airing his grievances, he did talk about the economy more than we've ever we've seen him in the last several months," Holmes said. "And that is what the White House was intending to do, to try and get the message across that he is aware that things are not in the place that they need to be, and that they are working on it as an administration."

That message did not land well, she said. And Republicans outside the White House had a different response to what the White House had aimed for, "which is try and alleviate people's fears."

Instead, it only ramped up people's worries, especially ahead of the midterms.

"Republicans came out of that speech more anxious that the messaging around the economy was not where it should be going into 2026, and that the party as a whole was not really solidified in that messaging about the economy, especially when it came to all of this blame on the previous administration," Holmes said.

Trump's former campaign advisers have claimed that the president has previously made gains in convincing people he has an understanding of improving the economy. But now things have changed.

"The other thing they said was that it was a lot easier to run when President Trump himself wasn't in power. When you are running against something, you were saying, you can change something," she added. "Now he is facing the same exact circumstances that President Biden was facing at the time, and handling it the exact same way, which, of course, is raising a lot of questions as to where Republicans are going to go from here."

Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Raw Story Investigates and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.