Top Stories Daily Listen Now
RawStory

2024 Elections

Trump camp plots how to use Colorado disqualification in campaign attack: report

Former President Donald Trump's team is already trying to come up with a way to use his disqualification from the ballot in Colorado in campaign attacks against President Joe Biden, reported Politico on Thursday.

"During an appearance in Iowa early this month, Trump called Biden a 'destroyer of American democracy.' Trump argued that Biden was using the justice system against him, despite there being no evidence that the president has had any connection to the four indictments Trump is facing," the outlet reported. "The Trump campaign has distributed black and white signs to supporters that read 'Biden Attacks Democracy,' and at a recent event Trump stood underneath a large banner emblazoned with the same phrase."

Keep reading... Show less

Fani Willis: Trump will get no 'special break' from prison

Donald Trump will not be given special sentencing treatment if convicted of conspiring to overturn the 2020 presidential election, says Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis.

CNN caught up with Willis at an event on Thursday.

Keep reading... Show less

DNC announces 'record' fundraising haul as GOP flounders

The Democratic National Committee is flush with cash as the party gears up for what may be one of the most high-stakes presidential elections in U.S. history.

On Thursday, DNC chairman Jaime Harrison tweeted that, when accounting for contributions from joint fundraising committees and affiliated PACs as well as direct donations, Democrats raked in $12.3 million as of December.

Keep reading... Show less

Strict reading of the law supports Colorado ruling — but SCOTUS won't: columnists

University of Baltimore School of Law professor Kimberly Wehle wrote Thursday that a strict constitutionalist that follows the letter of the law would support the ruling from the state of Colorado this week to ban Donald Trump from the ballot.

Writing for The Atlantic, Wehle cited the "striking ... conservative reasoning" from Colorado's Supreme Court justices in their conclusion.

Keep reading... Show less

GOPer gets legal fund donation from same company that sparked ethics probe: report

A legal defense fund set up by a Republican congressman to pay for expenses related to an ethics probe accepted a $5,000 donation from the same company that had caused the investigation to be launched.

Republican Rep. Alex Mooney (WV) is under investigation over allegations he accepted a week-long paid vacation for his family to Aruba from a direct mail company his campaign began paying for services in 2020. The vacation cost about $10,000, with much of the bill allegedly being picked up by the company.

Keep reading... Show less

'Trump engaged in insurrection': Former GOP AG sides with Colorado court

Appearing on CNN on Thursday morning, former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales was asked about the Colorado Supreme Court ruling Donald Trump should not appear on the 20204 ballot and replied that he agreed with it.

Speaking with host Erica Hill, the attorney who served under President George W. Bush said he'd rather go to court using the case presented by the court than the defense offered by Trump's legal team.

Asked why he leans toward the Colorado ruling, he explained that he feels there is ample evidence Trump helped to incite the Jan. 6 insurrection.

"I think on the merits, yes, one consideration, one argument will be the due process one, but putting that aside, which is not insignificant, I think it's fairly clear to me that former president Trump engaged in insurrection," he stated.

DON'T MISS: Marjorie Taylor Greene’s Jan. 6 anniversary plans: rally with Capitol infiltrator

"The language of the Constitution is engaged in insurrection, and I think he meets that standard based on the findings of the trial court judge in Colorado based on the excellent work of the January 6th Congressional committee," he continued. "I think, in my mind, that threshold has been met."

"This is a difficult position for the court," he elaborated. "I think the chief [Justice John Roberts] is already wrestling with concerns about the politics, the way that the public more and more views the court as a political institution. Whatever the outcome is here ... those views will simply be amplified. So it's an interesting conundrum. I don't envy the chief, and other members of the court, quite frankly, so we will have to wait and see. It's a difficult issue."

Watch below or at the link.

Keep reading... Show less

Trump lawyers' Supreme Court brief 'damaged' by his own input: former prosecutor

A filing submitted by Donald Trump's lawyers imploring the Supreme Court to delay ruling on whether he was covered by presidential immunity while committing alleged crimes was dismantled by a former U.S. Attorney who said it seemed to have been dictated by the former president in a way that damages its credibility.

On her Substack platform, ex-U-S. Attorney Joyce Vance agreed that the arguments proposed by the former president's lawyers are not "frivolous" ones, but their brief contains an assortment of arguments that lack the seriousness expected in a filing submitted to the nation's highest court.

With special counsel Jack Smith pushing the court to expedite a hearing that would allow U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia Judge Tanya Chutkan to maintain her trial schedule, the former president would rather they take their time and kick the can down the road past the 2024 presidential election.

According to Vance, "... ultimately, the cuteness and the conclusory suggestion that the 'Special Counsel identifies no compelling reason for haste' when the defendant, a potential presidential candidate, is the party who has filed these motions and asked for the indictment against him to be dismissed, falls flat."

Taking up a Trump legal team claim that "in 234 years of American history, no President ever faced criminal prosecution for his official acts,” the former prosecutor shot back, "That, of course, is not a fair criticism of the prosecution. It simply reflects that Trump is the first president in those 234 years to try to interfere with the transfer of power following an election. It’s not the point in Trump’s favor that his lawyers seem to think it is."

"The tone of Trump’s brief is far more snide that what you typically see in appellate argument, and probably far less combative than what Trump would have liked, particularly when they argue that the prosecution is a political attack," she continued before concluding, "Letting the client dictate the arguments that make it into a brief can damage the arguments overall credibility, and there’s some sense that happens here."

You can read more here.

Putin counting on the re-election of 'asset' Trump: former admin official

According to one of the top diplomats who served Donald Trump's administration, Russian President Vladimir Putin would like nothing better than for Donald Trump to be re-elected president because, as she put it, "he has his number."

The Guardian is reporting that Fiona Hill, a key adviser on Russian affairs in the Trump White House, claimed that a return of the former president to the Oval Office would ease pressure on the Russian strongman whose invasion into Ukraine has gone poorly at best.

Keep reading... Show less

'Mike Johnson cannot be trusted': Trump ally says speaker is secretly meeting Ron DeSantis

A failed Republican candidate whose content is shared by Donald Trump almost daily is now dishing the dirt on a fellow ally of the ex-president.

Laura Loomer, a self-styled journalist who has published reports on numerous Trump enemies, including Judge Engoron, who is overseeing the former president's civil fraud trial, has caught Trump's attention in recent weeks. In addition to Trump opponents, Loomer has also published articles on Trump ally Elise Stefanik, Marjorie Taylor Greene, and many others.

Keep reading... Show less

Trump plans to keep using Hitler-inspired phrases to stick it to the media: report

Former President Donald Trump has adopted rhetoric on the campaign trail experts have warned is startlingly close to that found in Adolf Hitler's "Mein Kampf," claiming that unauthorized immigrants are "poisoning the blood" of America.

But far from being shamed into backing down, sources tell Rolling Stone that Trump plans to go out of his way to ramp up use of the rhetoric, specifically to get a rise out of the media and the left.

Keep reading... Show less

Colorado ruling would be 'radioactive' to Trump in a general election: ex-aide

If the Supreme Court actually ends up upholding the Colorado court case disqualifying former President Donald Trump from the ballot, it would be catastrophic for him even if he were able in some way to continue running for office, argued former Trump White House communications official Alyssa Farah Griffin on CNN Wednesday evening.

The disqualification stems from the Insurrection Clause of the 14th Amendment, which prohibits anyone who has engaged in insurrection from holding public office except by a supermajority vote of Congress.

Keep reading... Show less

'Trump parrots Hitler': Biden campaign unleashes one of its 'most aggressive efforts yet'

President Joe Biden's 2024 campaign has released one of their "most aggressive efforts" yet against his opponent, ex-President Donald Trump, Axios reports.

The president's campaign shared a graphic via X (formerly Twitter) Wednesday illustrating the ways Trump compares to Adolf Hitler, with the caption that read, "This is not a coincidence."

Keep reading... Show less

Colorado dissents only bolster case to block Trump from ballot: conservative George Conway

The Colorado Supreme Court decision disqualifying former President Donald Trump from the 2024 ballot under the Insurrection Clause of the 14th Amendment is airtight, argued conservative attorney George Conway in The Atlantic — and one of the most telling indicators of that is how flimsy the dissents are.

"I came to adopt the practice not just for newsworthy rulings that I disagreed with, but for decisions I agreed with, including even obscure cases in the areas of business law I practiced," wrote Conway. "Dissents are generally shorter, and almost always more fun to read, than majority opinions; judges usually feel freer to express themselves when writing separately. But dissents are also intellectually useful: If there’s a weakness in the majority’s argument, an able judge will expose it, sometimes brutally, and she may make you change your mind, or at least be less dismissive of her position, even when you disagree. Give me a pile of Justice Elena Kagan’s dissents to read anytime — I love them even when she’s wrong, as I think she often is. You can learn a lot from dissents."

Keep reading... Show less