Alina Habba

'She is in a box': Expert says Judge Cannon caught herself in a trap in Trump case

She purportedly needs a shovel to help her out of the legal sandbox she has created.

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, presiding over the Trump's federal classified documents obstruction case, is in a quandary that former Deputy Attorney General Harry Litman believes is by her own design.

Keep reading... Show less

Trump made multiple verbal flubs at his rally minutes after insulting Biden's competency

Donald Trump on Friday failed to properly pronounce the word "subsidies" just minutes after insulting the competency of current president Joe Biden.

Trump was speaking at an event for the NRA in Pennsylvania when he insulted Biden for what he says is a failure to communicate and to find stairs during his events. Minutes later, Trump failed to pronounce a word.

Keep reading... Show less

Trump's V.P. hopefuls are willing to 'commit the crime' Mike Pence wouldn't: ex-prosecutor

Former President Donald Trump is likely to have a running mate who is willing to rig the electoral count for him, the way that former Vice President Mike Pence refused to do last time, warned former prosecutor John Flannery on Friday's edition of MSNBC's "The Beat."

This comes shortly after Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) and Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY), both rumored to be shortlisters for Trump's running mate, both said they would have stopped the count if they were in Pence's position.

Keep reading... Show less

Expert slams Judge Cannon's latest 'mind boggling' order for Trump to receive witness info

Judge Aileen Cannon's latest order in Donald Trump's criminal classified documents case boggles the mind, according to a MSNBC legal analyst Friday.

Cannon, who has been accused of being biased in favor of the former president and has in fact been reversed by an appeals court for an over-the-top order she made during the investigation phase of the documents case, earlier on Friday paused an order that would disclose witness details to the public following a request from Special Counsel Jack Smith.

Keep reading... Show less

'Justice Engoron was frustrated': Expert explains why judge is mad at Trump's legal team

Justice Arthur Engoron, the New York jurist presiding over former President Donald Trump's civil fraud trial, is fed up with the former president and his legal team, legal analyst Lisa Rubin explained on MSNBC Friday.

This comes as Allen Weisselberg, the former chief accountant for the Trump Organization, is reportedly in talks to plea guilty to perjury — all as Engoron tries to wrap up the civil fraud trial against Trump and his adult sons for allegedly falsifying property valuations to manipulate loan and tax treatment.

Keep reading... Show less

'He doesn't have that freedom': Expert says Trump can't move assets around to pay Carroll

Trump's sticker shock keeps multiplying.

After losing his $83.3 million defamation case against columnist E. Jean Carroll last month and facing down an even bigger penalty in his civil fraud case where New York Attorney General Letitia James is seeking $370 million in damages — Trump's reportedly hamstrung to be able to creatively move money around unlike the past.

Keep reading... Show less

SCOTUS response to a minor Trump filing will 'tell us everything we need to know': expert

With the D.C. Appeals Court rejecting former President Donald Trump's claim of absolute immunity from the federal election interference case, all eyes are now on the Supreme Court to see if they will review the case — potentially delaying Trump's trial for months more and possibly even past the election.

Legal analyst Lisa Rubin told MSNBC's Alicia Menendez on Friday what to look for.

Keep reading... Show less

Judge Cannon orders Jack Smith to turn over controversial info to Trump: court filing

Donald Trump will soon receive controversial information from Special Counsel Jack Smith after the judge overseeing the former president's criminal case over classified documents stashed at Mar-a-Lago, Judge Cannon, ordered the prosecutor to deliver the data.

Earlier on Friday, Cannon paused deadlines in a controversial order that special counsel Jack Smith had condemned as a “clear error” in the ex-president's classified document case, according to court records and reports. Earlier this week, Cannon ordered Smith to deliver to her by Friday proposals for unredacted FBI interview witness reports that could appear on the public docket.

Keep reading... Show less

Trump winning and causing a civil war would be 'worth it': evangelical preacher

Whatever it takes to return Trump back to 1600 Pennsylvania — even if it meant a civil war — would be "worth it," according to one religious leader.

"I've actually had people say that if Trump was to be elected if we got a conservative Congress, that they fear that we would have another civil war," Andrew Wommack, a TV evangelical preacher, said during an episode of his "Truth & Liberty" show earlier this week, and first reported by Newsweek. "And you know what? I don't want a civil war, I don't know anybody that does, but would it be worth it? To turn this nation back? I believe it would."

Keep reading... Show less

Trump's 'astonishing' court actions will turn juries against him in criminal cases: expert

Former President Donald Trump has a huge problem going into his upcoming trials, former federal prosecutor Elie Honig wrote for New York Magazine's The Intelligencer on Friday: his erratic behavior will quickly turn juries against him.

This comes in the wake of a jury holding Trump liable for $83.3 million in damages in the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial, a case in which he visibly clashed with the judge.

Keep reading... Show less

'Donald may be suffering from memory issues': Nikki Haley responds to Trump's new attack

Donald Trump's lone GOP rival for the Republican presidential nomination said Friday the former president is suffering from "memory issues."

Nikki Haley was responding to Trump's latest attack, also on Friday, in which he accused his own former U.N. ambassador of supporting ex-president Barack Obama. Trump also said Haley is a "flunky" for Mitt Romney, a former Republican presidential nominee.

Keep reading... Show less

Trump Supreme Court eligibility win could decimate his immunity hopes: legal scholars

With the Supreme Court likely poised to hand former President Donald Trump a big win by keeping him on the ballot in November 2024 despite his role in inciting the January 6th Capitol riots, several legal scholars say it could come at a cost.

Following the hearing before the full court on Thursday, the consensus among court watchers is that there is no chance the court will uphold a Colorado Supreme Court order banishing the former president from the ballots in the state based upon provisions found in the 14th Amendment.

As the New York Times' Adam Liptak wrote, a ruling in Trump's favor should be issued swiftly and next up for the embattled ex-president should be hearing an appeal after the three-judge panel in the U.S. Court of Appeals shot down his bid for absolute immunity for acts committed while president.

According to one law professor, ruling for Trump on eligibility could push the court to "even" things out on the controversial cases by denying his appeal or hearing it and ruling against him.

ALSO READ: Alina Habba is persona non grata at her Pennsylvania law school

Speaking with the Times, University of Texas law professor Tara Leigh Grove said she sees the two cases as being "linked."

“History tells us that the Supreme Court does better with the public — in other words, is seen as more legitimate — when it does not rule repeatedly just for ‘one side’ of the political aisle,” she explained. “So I anticipate that the justices will welcome a kind of ‘split decision’ in these cases. That is, the court can rule that President Trump remains on the ballot, and yet has no immunity from federal criminal prosecution.”

UC Davis law professor Vikram Amar, who filed an amicus brief supporting Colorado, agreed while expressing dismay with how Thursday's hearing went.

“Unfortunately, it seems the justices may be coalescing around some analytically weak arguments as a way of disposing of this case in a way they think will avoid expending the court’s scarce political capital,” he stated before adding, "There’s no logical connection between the issues in this case and those in the immunity case but a cynic might say ruling for Trump here frees up the court to rule against him there.”

You can read more here.

Weisselberg perjury allegations could put Alina Habba's career at risk: attorney

According to MSNBC legal analyst Lisa Rubin, attorney Alina Habba's curious response to a letter from Judge Arthur Engoron over perjury allegations levied against Allen Weisselberg, the ex-chief financial officer for the Trump Organization, should be raising eyebrows.

At issue, she noted, is that the controversial Habba not only has Donald Trump as a client but also defended Weisselberg, who pleaded guilty to 15 counts that included grand larceny, falsifying business records and criminal tax fraud.

Keep reading... Show less