Video

Trump's next week will be 'legal hell' as ex-president faces 'one-two punch': legal expert

Next week will be "legal hell" for Donald Trump, a former federal prosecutor said Friday.

The former president is dealing with various criminal and civil cases, including a D.C. elections case where the trial could be put on track by the Supreme Court making a decision on Trump's presidential immunity claim. There's also the criminal documents case, where the judge is at risk of being removed for bias. And that's just scratching the surface of his legal woes.

Keep reading... Show less

Judge Cannon could be removed from Trump case under 'three strikes rule': George Conway

The judge presiding in Trump's criminal case over the alleged hoarding of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago case may be replaced.

"...There's kind of a three strikes rule," said conservative attorney and co-founder of the Trump-bashing Lincoln Project George Conway said during an appearance on CNN's "Anderson 360" to wade in on the fracas in Florida where U.S. District judge Aileen Cannon is presiding. "I've seen it happen."

Keep reading... Show less

'Hack' Aileen Cannon is 'putting lives in danger' with her demands of Jack Smith: analyst

Right-wing Judge Aileen Cannon, who is presiding over former President Donald Trump's classified documents case, ordered special counsel Jack Smith to turn over information to the defense team that he has repeatedly warned could be used to facilitate witness tampering.

And Slate legal analyst Mark Joseph Stern is furious about it, as he made clear on MSNBC Friday evening.

Keep reading... Show less

Trump's Monday Supreme Court filing may be 'the whole ball game': legal expert

Monday is purportedly pivotal for Trump.

That's because he will decide whether or not to seek an appeal with SCOTUS. They in turn will then have the power to pause or move the hands of time when it comes to an immunity Hail Mary.

Keep reading... Show less

'She is in a box': Expert says Judge Cannon caught herself in a trap in Trump case

She purportedly needs a shovel to help her out of the legal sandbox she has created.

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, presiding over the Trump's federal classified documents obstruction case, is in a quandary that former Deputy Attorney General Harry Litman believes is by her own design.

Keep reading... Show less

Trump's V.P. hopefuls are willing to 'commit the crime' Mike Pence wouldn't: ex-prosecutor

Former President Donald Trump is likely to have a running mate who is willing to rig the electoral count for him, the way that former Vice President Mike Pence refused to do last time, warned former prosecutor John Flannery on Friday's edition of MSNBC's "The Beat."

This comes shortly after Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) and Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY), both rumored to be shortlisters for Trump's running mate, both said they would have stopped the count if they were in Pence's position.

Keep reading... Show less

'Justice Engoron was frustrated': Expert explains why judge is mad at Trump's legal team

Justice Arthur Engoron, the New York jurist presiding over former President Donald Trump's civil fraud trial, is fed up with the former president and his legal team, legal analyst Lisa Rubin explained on MSNBC Friday.

This comes as Allen Weisselberg, the former chief accountant for the Trump Organization, is reportedly in talks to plea guilty to perjury — all as Engoron tries to wrap up the civil fraud trial against Trump and his adult sons for allegedly falsifying property valuations to manipulate loan and tax treatment.

Keep reading... Show less

'He doesn't have that freedom': Expert says Trump can't move assets around to pay Carroll

Trump's sticker shock keeps multiplying.

After losing his $83.3 million defamation case against columnist E. Jean Carroll last month and facing down an even bigger penalty in his civil fraud case where New York Attorney General Letitia James is seeking $370 million in damages — Trump's reportedly hamstrung to be able to creatively move money around unlike the past.

Keep reading... Show less

SCOTUS response to a minor Trump filing will 'tell us everything we need to know': expert

With the D.C. Appeals Court rejecting former President Donald Trump's claim of absolute immunity from the federal election interference case, all eyes are now on the Supreme Court to see if they will review the case — potentially delaying Trump's trial for months more and possibly even past the election.

Legal analyst Lisa Rubin told MSNBC's Alicia Menendez on Friday what to look for.

Keep reading... Show less

Legal expert: Hur violated 'long-standing DOJ principle' by wading into 'hot-button issue'

Department of Justice special counsel Robert Hur's new report may have exonerated President Joe Biden from any criminal wrongdoing over his handling of classified documents, but its characterization of Biden's mental fortitude has one legal expert questioning Hur's use of certain language.

Even though the nearly 400-page report concluded that Biden's actions didn't warrant any criminal charges, Hur — whom former President Donald Trump appointed as US Attorney for the District of Maryland in 2018 — still made several digs at Biden. The report mentioned his mental faculties nine times, and Hur referred to the president as a "sympathetic, well-meaning elderly man with a poor memory."

Keep reading... Show less

Watch: GOP lawmaker audibly sighs when asked about Elise Stefanik's latest remarks

A Republican congressman audibly sighed at Rep. Elise Stefanik's insistence that she would have done what former vice president Mike Pence refused to do on Jan. 6, 2021.

The New York Republican, who is widely considered a leading contender for Donald Trump's running mate, told CNN's Kaitlan Collins that Pence was wrong to accept electors from Pennsylvania and other states the former president lost in 2020, saying there had been "constitutional overreach," and Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) paused and sighed loudly when asked Friday about his GOP colleague's remarks.

Keep reading... Show less

'A sloppy report': Prosecutor singles out contradictions in Hur's Biden findings

Appearing on MSNBC's "Morning Joe," State Attorney for Palm Beach County Dave Aronberg dumped all over the special counsel Robert Hur for his report on President Joe Biden retaining government documents and questioned whether Hur is even aware he contradicted himself in his conclusions.

Speaking with hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski, the Florida prosecutor bluntly called the report "sloppy."

"Joe, when I thought that this was such a political gift to candidate Donald Trump that he may have to list it as an in-kind campaign contribution," he joked. "Robert Hur's appointment as special counsel is another example of [Attorney General] Merrick Garland's determination to appear apolitical. That's why he kept on a Republican Trump appointed U.S.. attorney in David Weiss to investigate Hunter Biden. That's why he appointed a Republican Trump-appointed U.S. Attorney in Robert Hur to investigate President Biden."

ALSO READ: There is no justice in America

'Merrick Garland didn't have to put all this extraneous stuff out there," Aronberg exclaimed. "How different is this than [Trump Attorney General] Bill Barr who refused to show the public the Mueller report and then issued that three-page memo that misled the public?"

"This investigation should have been relatively easy; there was full cooperation. The only reason they found out about the documents is Joe Biden told them about it — it's a sloppy report!' he exclaimed.

"Summary on page one says that there was willful retention and disclosure, but then on page 215 it says there's a shortage of evidence on these points: which is it?" he ranted. "The question to me is why did he do this? I think the reason is he was motivated to avoid David Weiss's fate. David Weiss is hated by his own party. I think that's why Robert Hur did this. It's Comey 2.0."

Watch below or at the link.

Keep reading... Show less

CNN host scolded by Dem Goldman for comparing Biden docs to Trump's Mar-a-Lago stash

CNN "This Morning" co-host Phil Mattingly was on the receiving end of a fierce dressing down from Rep. Dan Goldman (D-NY) after he tried to equate the finding in special counsel Robert Hur's on documents President Joe Biden had in his home with the boxes of material found in Mar-a-Lago that Donald Trump refused to return until the FBI showed up.

During his appearance on CNN, Mattingly pressed Goldman — who served as lead majority counsel in Trump's first impeachment trial — on Hur's controversial report about Biden's "willful retention" of documents which received immediate pushback.

Keep reading... Show less