Video

Appearing on MSNBC with host Ali Velshi, Washington Post columnist Jennifer Rubin claimed Donald Trump is finally running into some major headwinds as he makes his third run for the presidency and a major one is questions about his mental decline.

According to the journalist, even Republicans are starting to admit the former president is not all there — something that has become a major talking point in South Carolina Republican Nikki Haley's campaign.

Pointing to President Joe Biden's re-election campaign, she told the host, "The economy is pretty good and it's been good for a while, of course, but you wouldn't know it from some of the coverage. Now, I think that has shifted quite dramatically and Biden is getting some recognition."

ALSO READ: Why Trump was the worst boss ever — according to 12 of his top White House officials

Adding, "I think there's a lot of things that we don't normally credit with for President Biden, and the last is that it's becoming pretty apparent, even to Republicans, that he [Trump] has got a screw loose."

"He slurs his words, he gets confused. That's what Nikki Haley has been exploiting finally," she elaborated. "It's not going to help her with the Republican base, but it sure is going to provide a lot of material for President Biden in the general election."

Watch below or at the link.

Asked if Donald Trump can use campaign contributions and other funds given to him by donors to pay a part or the total $83.3 million due to E. Jean Carroll for defaming her, MSNBC legal analyst Danny Cevallos claimed the law is unsettled but the former president may find his donors less than forgiving.

Appearing less than 24 hours after a Manhattan jury brought the hammer down on Trump for his attacks on the New York writer, Cevallos was asked by MSNBC host Ali Velshi if the former president can tap donor funds to at the very least pay a portion of the judgment.

According to the legal analyst, Trump will have to tread carefully to avoid a "backlash" from supporters.

"We are in unprecedented territory where you have a political candidate who has massive judgments and possibly, eventually criminal court fines and he may be using those same funds to pay off those fines and or judgments," he told host Velshi.

Appearing as a guest on MSNBC's "The Weekend," host of her own MSNBC show Katie Phang explained that the $83.3 million judgment Donald Trump was slapped with by the jurors in the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial likely not only plunged his finances into turmoil but may make it near impossible to for him to get outside help.

Speaking with the hosts, Phang, a former prosecutor, explained the hoops Trump will have to jump through to come up with the entire amount to go into a trust if he appeals the devastating verdict, which he has indicated he will do, or to convince a bonding company to help him out.

'He could use real estate properties," she suggested. "But the problem for Donald Trump's leverage is he is overleveraging himself, and that is what got him into trouble in the first place with the New York Attorney General's case for the civil fraud."

"Well, there is that saying the numbers don't lie. They don't, they are what they are" Phang later added. "That's kind of what got Donald Trump into trouble with the New York Attorney General's office. But to your question, Donald Trump has said that he has $400 million in liquid cash to be able to access — that does not include the totality of his assets which is a real estate portfolio other investments that he has."

ALSO READ: Few Trumpers who embrace political violence understand its endgame

"You know it is the cumulative effect of whether or not it is enough to make a dent in his net worth. I think that your net worth, especially for someone like Donald Trump, isn't just cash on hand. Your net worth also includes whether people think that you're a risk, a risk worth taking. So, putting aside what a success is with the New York AG's case and whether he's able to survive what they called a corporate death penalty to be able to do business in the state of New York, is Donald Trump a worthwhile risk if you are a person in the world of finance and business?"

"Is the kind of person that you think is going to be worth taking a gamble on to loan money to; to be able to invest with to continue to maybe make a profit with," she added. "We have seen him file bankruptcies. We have seen him fail miserably as a businessman. So despite his attestations or his protestations that he is worth a lot of money, that his brand is valuable, and then he's quote 'the richest man in the world' because of that brand, the reality comes crashing down for him because it is not."

Donald Trump attorney Alina Habba's abrasive behavior and her decision to defend the former president in the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial with an eye on pleasing him, and not trying to convince a jury, in the end cost her client tens of millions of dollars..

That is the opinion of former Republican National Committee chair Michael Steele, which he explained as part of his duties hosting MSNBC's "The Weekend."

During a panel discussion on the stunning $83.3 million judgment levied against the former president on Friday, Steele stated he wanted to focus on Habba and shared a clip of her combative impromptu press conference outside the courthouse after the verdict was read.

Noting that Habba claimed defending Trump was "the proudest thing I could ever do," Steele reminded viewers of Habba's previous claims that she would rather be "pretty than smart" to which she replied, "pretty" because she can "fake being smart."

After introducing the clip by stating, "One of the things I found very fascinating as we looked at the professionals in the room, E. Jean Carroll's lawyer, and those who were laying out the case before the judge, the jury, and then there is Alina Habba, I would like to play her response to this verdict," he continued afterward with, "I recall a comment that she made at one point where she was asked, would you rather be pretty or smart, and a response was, I would rather be pretty because I can fake being smart."

Laughing he continued, "So the reality of it is that you need to be smart in the courtroom. You need to understand that her reaction a lot of times shocked."

ALSO READ: Why Trump was the worst boss ever — according to 12 of his top White House officials

"It was performative, and it was to appease Trump, it was not to deal with the facts that were at hand, and first off, this was not a case where you are trying to prevent him from being judged a sexual predator," he explained. "That had already taken place. This was about something very different. She seemed to be out of sorts with what her mission was, and actually wound up costing her client I think an incredible amount of money."

U.S. Rep. Pete Stauber (R-MN) was served a "reality check" by U.S. Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg on Friday, after the pro-Trump election-denying Republican repeatedly took credit this week for a massive infrastructure project in his home state, funded by President Joe Biden's legislation the Minnesota Congressman voted against.

"Reality check: I approved this because it’s a deserving project, consistent with President Biden’s priorities. This is happening because the Biden infrastructure package passed, despite your 'no' vote," wrote Secretary Buttigieg on social media, in response to Rep. Staubert's video providing what he claimed was a "fact check."