Fox contributor: Liberals who reject that men should dominate women are anti-science

Fox Business personalities had a collective freak out on Wednesday night after learning that mothers were now the primary source of income in 40 percent of U.S. households.

Fox Business host Lou Dobbs asserted women earning more than their husbands was an indication of the dissolution of American society. Fox News political analyst Juan Williams agreed, describing it as a sign of the disintegration of marriage that would have negative consequences for generations to come.

Fox News contributor Erick Erickson went one step further, saying nature itself commanded that women be subservient to men.

"I'm so used to liberals telling conservatives that they're anti-science," Erickson explained. "But liberals who defend this and say it is not a bad thing are very anti-science. When you look at biology, when you look at the natural world, the roles of a male and a female in society and in other animals, the male typically is the dominant role. The female, it's not antithesis, or it's not competing, it's a complementary role."

"We as people in a smart society have lost the ability to have complimentary relationships in nuclear families, and it is tearing us apart," he continued, adding that "reality showed" it was harmful for women to be the primary source of income in a family.

Fox News contributor Doug Schoen concluded the freak out by claiming all these so-called breadwinner moms "could undermine our social order."

UPDATE: Erick Erickson doubles down

In a blog post on his website RedState, Erickson attacked his critics and reaffirmed that women should be in a subservient role. He asserted that children "will do best" when their mom stays at home and their father goes out to work.

"Many feminist and emo lefties have their panties in a wad over my statements in the past 24 hours about families," he wrote.

Watch video, via Media Matters, below: