Susie Wiles ignored FBI warnings about Epstein memo that set off MAGA 'earthquake': report

Add to the number of missteps Donald Trump’s White House has made with regard to the “explosive” Jeffrey Epstein files, Trump Chief of Staff Susie Wiles believed that the controversy would blow over after the FBI released a memo on their findings.

She could not have been more wrong and she had been warned, according to the New York Times’ Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan.

According to their forthcoming book "Regime Change: Inside the Imperial Presidency of Donald Trump," Haberman and Swan wrote that a small group of White House and Justice Department officials drafted a memo designed to explain why the department would not release further information about Epstein. But the process of composing it was reportedly chaotic, with officials refusing to put their names on it and deep concerns emanating from FBI leadership.

FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino had grown increasingly infuriated as they realized the scale of the crisis they were being blamed for managing. They repeatedly raised internal alarms that the Epstein controversy was gaining dangerous momentum with Trump's supporters.

Bongino pushed hard for immediate release of surveillance footage from the federal facility where Epstein was found dead in his cell—a definitive gesture meant to satisfy the MAGA base's demand for transparency. But the Justice Department's "nothing-to-see-here" memo was being prepared for public release instead, the report notes.

Bongino objected strenuously. He told Patel the memo would undermine their promises of transparency and he refused to put the FBI seal on the letterhead -- but he was overruled.

Inside the White House, Trump had no interest in releasing anything, according to the upcoming book. Senior officials including Wiles and Deputy Chief of Staff James Blair were initially dismissive about the scope of the Epstein crisis and reportedly told colleagues Republican voters "didn't care," citing early polling data from Trump's chief pollster Tony Fabrizio. The Epstein controversy, in their view, was driven by "fringe conspiracy theorists" and amplified by noisy online influencers—not a meaningful voting bloc. Engaging with it, they argued, would only amplify the story and lend it official legitimacy.

Wiles, Blair, and Trump's inner circle had watched him weather countless scandals over years and they believed this wasn't "a storm," but instead "passing clouds."

Bongino disagreed vehemently. "It's not an online story," he reportedly told White House advisers bluntly. "You don't understand."

He was proven right almost immediately with Swan and Haberman writing, "The memo was an earthquake, and it was received by a part of the MAGA base as an outright betrayal.

Instead of closing the Epstein file, the Justice Department's carefully worded document landed like a bomb in the MAGA base. A significant faction of Trump's most ardent supporters received it not as reassurance but "as outright betrayal" —an abrupt disavowal of the sinister conspiracy theories that Trump's closest confidants had hyped during the Biden presidency and promised to expose once Trump returned to power.