Trump makes his great escape from the Epstein files
Trump's escape trick is utilized to get him out of the Epstein files.
The latest from Raw Story's Nick Anderson, a Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist.
Trump's escape trick is utilized to get him out of the Epstein files.
The latest from Raw Story's Nick Anderson, a Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist.
The most surprising thing about Karoline “KKKaroline” Leavitt’s announcement that she’s leaving her job as White House Press Secretary was that she had lasted so long in the first place.
Considering the track records of all of her predecessors, you’d think Trump would’ve installed a golden revolving door to the Press Room, along with all of the other unnecessary renovations he’s making to our White House while vandalizing D.C. to make America look as weak as possible on the global stage.
Weird how nobody’s ever asked KKKaroline about that, or what happened to all of the historical artifacts from the East Wing after he decided to bulldoze it.
Anyway, many people are saying Leavitt’s breaking point came when she learned she was on the decoy plane from Turkey, while Trump’s wet nurse, Natalie Harp, got to fly with him, as did Diet Coke Valet Walt Nauta. That rumor was shared by the Iranians, with Leavitt responding that she wasn't actually aboard.
However, some other people are suggesting that the decoy plane story is a decoy in and of itself, and that Trump flew back on an Air Force One tricked out like a hospital, including his full staff of 18 doctors. Because the media couldn’t have been allowed to see all of that, the second, or “decoy,” plane was packed with Cabinet members making sure the media had full access to them.
Weird if true, huh?
In all likelihood, KKKaroline most likely learned that a truncated maternity leave is bad for a postpartum new mom in all kinds of ways, but especially when she’s forced to return to multiple Trump scandals that also include her. Now that her reign of Trumpterror is coming to an end, one name being floated to replace her belongs to someone who’s already established himself as an ultimate Trumpsimp: CNN’s smarmiest, whiniest, and most compromised commentator, Scott “I’m Telling Mom!” Jennings.
Jennings has been repeatedly criticized for his personal attacks on his fellow panelists, from Leigh McGowan to Adam Mockler.
He's gone off the rails multiple times, condescendingly bullying panelists while incorporating the right-wing propaganda he’s more than happy to spread. Viewer complaints about Jennings have made him a liability for CNN, because he’s made it abundantly clear that he’s fine with Trump’s entire record of crimes against women, children, and the rest of humanity.
Which makes him the perfect replacement for Leavitt.
Trump demands loyalty above all else, yet never returns any. I don’t know why all of these people are letting him treat them so badly when he’s a convicted felon adjudicated rapist who’s mentioned in the Epstein Files roughly 36,700 more times than Jesus is mentioned in the Bible. We can just add that to the endless list of “why” questions that will never be answered, something Jennings excels at doing.
I’ve repeatedly tried to get any response on Twitter from Smug Scotty, but like most mediocre MAGA men, he’s never once replied. They love the ostrich method of ignoring the truth they don’t like, which will be hard for him to maintain from behind a podium.
Putting Jennings at the Press Room podium presents yet another opportunity for the Democrats to finally hire a Press Secretary of their own. If I had a dollar for every time I’ve written, podcasted, or tweeted about my idea, I would at least have enough dollars to pay my rent for a year.
It would be beyond simple and relatively inexpensive for the Democrats to set up a daily press briefing at the Capitol, which would take place after Scotty J finishes lying and bullying the media for the day.
The Democratic Press Secretary, their Deputy, and staff would need a couple of offices and a podium, and that’s about it. All press would be welcome to attend the daily briefing, regardless of which outlet they work for.
As for who should be in that role, let’s first eliminate who shouldn’t be doing it:
-current members of the government
-anyone considering a run for president in 2028
I realize that leaves a fairly wide-open field. I’d first look to someone who’s got media experience already, similar to Scott Jennings, but nicer, smarter, and not at all smug or treasonous.
Despite the title “Secretary” being gender-neutral, I will always prefer a woman in that role ever since Allison Janney played CJ Cregg on The West Wing. Putting a woman in such a vitally important public-facing and high-profile role matters, especially at a time when the Republican Party is systematically trying to take away all of our rights. She would be the grown-up alternative to Jennings and his juvenile antics, laying the groundwork to restore some dignity to the White House once Democrats get it back in 2028.
It’s unlikely my top choice, Jessica Tarlov, would be interested in taking a severe pay cut to leave Fox News, plus she’s performing a much-needed public service there five days a week on The Five. I’m not sure what the contracts are like over at MS Now, formerly MSNBC, but I could easily see Symone Sanders-Townsend taking on the press with her patented take-no-BS attitude.
My friend, former Republican strategist Cheri Jacobus, would also be stellar in the role, especially since she’s also been advocating for a Democratic Press Secretary for about as long as I have.
Some people have suggested I should be the Democratic Press Secretary, and that’s a no from me. I prefer a more behind-the-scenes role because I’m a bossy Taurus — but one who loves being part of a team. “Consultant” sounds pretty good, which I kind of feel I already am because I keep giving them my ideas for free.
Americans are craving the truth like it’s a fresh salad right now — we have no idea what’s safe and what might kill us anymore. And that’s something a Democratic Press Secretary would never lie about.
Go back 35 years, and you see it. It's right there as part of the story, impossible to avoid. The man who used to go on Howard Stern's radio show to run down a list of women and grade them from one through 10, full body, definitely face and features, President Donald J. Trump would sputter out a number, "She's an 8.5, would be a nine or more if she weren't so flat," or something similarly as offensive as juvenile.
Decades later, and he's still at it; perhaps he's matured out of vocalizing the grade, but the women at the White House better bring the mandated look. Trump wants them ready for cameras and his eyes, always. It is now exhausting them into little leaks about the look he demands.
We all know the MAGA look; it's the only one available, that's the point. Without regard to the time of day or night, each one rolls through the White House makeup studio, where apparently they specialize in one style, the one the boss wants. The excuse is that if you work at that level, you better look the part.
To be somewhat just as cruel, he expects the same of the men and their suits, but it's far easier for men, and probably is really for the cameras and not the other lens in play.
In a Mail on Sunday report, multiple female White House staffers revealed the "draining" expectations put on women working in Trump's orbit. And that the toll might be driving the otherwise most talented women out the door (talent for lying, snarkiness, mean girl stuff). Sure, sure, the boss demands they be camera-ready: "Those glossy smiles and immaculate clothes are, of course, what the outside world sees."
But this isn't that, because the real problem lies within the White House. The report notes what we all know: the cloud of disgusting misogyny that formed over the man who bragged about walking through the Miss Teen USA pageant remains, despite the fact that we hear very little news about the battles we assume are going on in the White House — battles that seem all but inevitable and yet remain protected by a moat-like silence regarding the experience of being a woman around a guy that bragged about grabbing intimate parts.
True. The inexplicable silence has one loud exception, and it might make up for the lack of lingering issues threatening to blow the dump... (The symbolism in every sentence just can't be intentional, can it?). There is the ever-present Natalie Harp, and ever-present is doing some heavy lifting in that sentence. The world has known of this weirdness for a while, but it took the New York Times' Maggie Haberman to take it to the next level when she said: "[Harp] is sort of his binky, for lack of a better way of putting it."
Everyone huddle up. Not one word on where to take that, begging for analogies, hilarious double entendre; everyone, just turn around and suppress all the screaming symbolism, and simply acknowledge that we need not know anything more. Because we already know that Harp happens to be a blonde bombshell attached at the hip of this particular man. Given what we suspect, we can be sure what such a situation would do to any marriage. Even something purely platonic would result in a plain service of papers from a partner.
Wave it aside because Harp never seems bothered by the opportunity. She's unquestionably a capable adult as opposed to some other "leaks" we've heard from decades ago, and she never seems to be blinking in Morse code to get her out. She actually looks elated.
Fine.
But most women are not, and despite the fact that we have about as much empathy for anyone working to advance this administration's agenda as they have for us, none, it's still worth examining.
Why? The women knew what they were getting into. But it matters anyway because if a man and then men surrounding him create such an environment, imagine what they think of the women in this country who are coming home from work, kissing their partners, and running the kids to swim lessons wearing an Eddie Bauer Sweater and Levi's. They don't count. True, to the Republicans in power, no Democrat counts — but there's a special disdain for strong women going about their lives, worried far less about their looks than their legitimacy as empowered equals.
But policy after policy put forth by this president degrades American women's role and environment. Let's start with the most obvious: Trump and Hegseth refusing to promote deserving women to general or admiral rank in the military, women far too concerned with protecting the nation, teaching their troops, plotting strategy, to worry about Botox injections and $250 hair.
Immediately following Trump's inauguration, he simply assumed that any woman who had earned a place in the government's vast bureaucracy, the people whose work made the government work, were hired to fill quotas and fired them.
Of course, there is even more in-your-face stuff (literally) in appointing judges fiercely fighting anything that could be called abortion even as the mother lay dying on an operating table. And Trump oversaw the indefensible change to Title IX in 2020, making it far harder for young women everywhere to bring sexual harassment claims on campus, requiring more evidence, raising the burden of proof.
Now that one sure overlaps with what we hear about the environment in the White House, with halls of horrors for women specifically chosen for a role that all but demands sexual harassment, or at least offensive expectations, which, because of the spread to women throughout the nation, we can abhor.
But there may be limits because it sounds like the first team, the varsity, the most sexually appealing (to Trump), loyal, and maddeningly competent are crashing and cashing out, none more prominent than Karoline Leavitt. As my co-columnist John Casey noted, none of us can blame her; she has two beautiful babies at home and a beautiful income with which to support them. It's a minor miracle she lasted this long.
But she's not the only one. The Daily Mail notes the departure of Deputy Press Secretary Abigail Jackson and Director of Media Affairs Sonny Joy Nelson. But the tenor of the article is such that it feels like several underlings have left, with more to follow. From the outside, that may be a good thing: the first string, the most effective and most striking, the type that can dependably implement these horrific policies may soon be gone, replaced by equally exquisite MAGA melting personnel, priority one, but likely lessers in everything else.
Let's leave with this. One of the most remarkable features of Trump White House Part Two has been the silence regarding palace intrigue. Yes, books have been written about the actual implementation of duties, accompanied by some juicy details. But in an environment that simply must be bursting with toxic testosterone, it's been weirdly quiet.
But news of the utter exasperation accompanying Leavitt's leaving has cracked the door. The leaks didn't squeeze themselves. And for Haberman to feel comfortable assessing Natalie Harp as... Trump's binky, well, it says a great deal about a woman's place around Trump: less advising, more soothing. A man would be an essential aide. Not Harp.
If Harp is having a blast... my word, if she's fine with it, fine. But for the other women called in at 6 a.m. on a Saturday, having to toss the sweater aside for the makeup chair and wardrobe for the most real television show in the history of reality TV, well, they certainly can't say that they're enduring extra abuse. They endure far less than many women around the country.
Meanwhile, Leavitt left her mark, having never worn an even moderately loose outfit in her entire tenure. But for the most prominent White House voice under "his" voice, vociferously attempting to validate ridding the nation of DEI and Title IX, to now go home to two babies with all the wealth needed to never be nervous, something incredibly rare for most women in this country seems offensive.
But without regard to anything else, especially the decimation of women's rights in this country, the right to be free of sexual harassment — never enduring a comment about a nice body, joking about heels, begging she bend over, and so much worse — it's wrong in the White House, and like a virus, spreads disgustingly from there.
White House staffers have the option to leave. Daughters headed off to college don't. It took this long to leak? It better take a lot less time for women everywhere to yell far and wide about everything unacceptable.
All the way down to 18-year-olds in their Levi's and sweaters, formerly protected by Title IX, but drawing Trump's eyes now for 30 years.
Jason Miciak is a Rawstory Columnist, former editor of Occupy Democrats, author, attorney, and single parent girldad. Please follow on Bluesky, and he can be reached at jasonmiciak@gmail.com.
Yesterday at the White House, Trump held a photo op with a 16-year-old lifeguard, Ryder Williams, who’d pulled a drowning 10-year-old out of a dangerous surf in Santa Cruz. For any other president, it would have been a sweet, feel-good moment. Trump, though, turned it into something dark — and most of our press either missed it or politely pretended to.
After giving the award, Trump looked at the blonde teen’s parents and said:
“You did a good job. It’s good genetics. When you look at him, you can see, really good.”
People in the room chuckled nervously as some probably realized what Trump was really saying. Others seemed clueless. Mediaite wrote the story up and wondered out loud if Trump was trying to invoke the infamous Sydney Sweeney “great jeans” commercial.
But Trump wasn’t riffing on the jeans ad. He was sharing, in the Oval office and on camera, something he’s been saying for 40 years, his racist “racehorse genetics” theory of human evolution. And it’s something that, when it comes out of other people’s mouths, has ended careers.
For example, back in 1988 on Martin Luther King Day, CBS’s sports commentator Jimmy “The Greek” Snyder was asked by a reporter about the progress that Black people were making in the field of sports.
Snyder told the reporter that Black athletes were doing well because “the slave owner would breed his big black to his big woman so that he could have a big black kid,” and that a Black athlete was better than most whites “because he’s been bred to be that way.”
CBS fired him the next day because everybody in America understood instantly what he had said and where it came from.
Thirty-eight years later, the President of the United States says essentially the same thing about human beings in the White House and gets laughs and a write-up about denim.
This was not a slip of the tongue. The same year Jimmy The Greek was fired, Trump told Oprah on her show that his success was the result of being “born lucky in the sense that you have to have the right genes.” (Forget the fact that his father gave him ~$400 million.) He told a rally audience in 2016 that, with him, “winning is innate” and some people just “have the winning gene.”
Michael D’Antonio who wrote one of the early Trump biographies and knew the family, told PBS’s Frontline program that they all subscribed to the so-called “racehorse theory of human development.”
That theory says that because breeding top racehorses with each other produces more top racehorses then, similarly, a superior man and a superior woman will produce superior children. He even once complimented a roomful of British businessmen on their superior “bloodlines” and praised notorious antisemite Henry Ford’s “good bloodlines” while touring a Ford plant.
Talking to an all-white audience in Bemidji, Minnesota in 2020, Trump warned about the Black Somali refugees who’d settled in that state, saying:
“You [white people] have good genes, you know that, right? A lot of it is about the genes, isn’t it, don’t you believe? The racehorse theory. You think we’re so different? You have good genes in Minnesota.”
On rightwing talk host Hugh Hewitt’s hate radio show, he said:
“Now a murderer, I believe this, it’s in their genes. And we got a lot of bad genes in our country right now.”
Trump’s “racehorse theory” isn’t just some throwaway line or colorful figure of speech; it’s from the foundational myth of one of the darkest times in American history, the eugenics (“racial hygiene”) movement that reached its peak during the presidency of Woodrow Wilson, a notorious racist who screened the Klan recruiting film Birth of a Nation at the White House. Hitler based his “final solution” on American and British eugenics literature that encouraged the isolation and sterilization of “inferior” people.
That led to the racist 1924 Immigration Act that later turned away Jewish refugees fleeing Hitler’s death camps, and the Supreme Court blessed a model sterilization law for “inferior” humans in their 1927 Buck v Bell decision. German lawyers translated that decision and used it as the framework for the Third Reich’s own 1933 sterilization law that preceded and ultimately set up the Holocaust.
Tens of thousands of Americans were sterilized against their will back then, and at the Nuremberg trials multiple German defendants argued that they were “simply following American science.”
But the racehorse theory of humanity wasn’t even new in the 1920s: slavery was justified in this country for centuries based on the supposed inferiority of Black people. Crainiometry — the “science” of determining how “advanced” a person is by measuring their skull — was rolled out in the 19th century as a way of proving whites were the most advanced race.
In 1851, a Louisiana physician named Samuel Cartwright published a nationally distributed pamphlet claiming that enslaved people who’d run away from their plantations were doing so because they suffered from a mental illness he called “drapetomania.” He explicitly wrote that God had made Black people “naturally submissive,” so when they rose up or escaped, it was because they were expressing symptoms of that mental pathology.
Southern politicians trying to justify Jim Crow after the failure of Reconstruction used the same trick MAGA racists use today, citing crime and imprisonment statistics by way of “proving” that Black people are simply “born bad.” As noted Substack author Rohn Kenyatta writes:
“The manifestation of this racism and white supremacy need not be blatant as it is often cloaked in stories on crime, poverty, voting rights, illiteracy and ‘civil rights.’”
The whole point of Trump’s racehorse theory is to provide a pseudo-scientific explanation for the outcome of centuries of institutionalized racism. Today, while the median white family has assets of around $285,000 (home and car ownership, retirement funds, etc.), the median Black household is only worth $45,000.
Trump doesn’t want you to know why, and his good or bad genes proclamations are designed to make us ignore everything from unequal access to the GI Bill and Redlining to plain old racism.
Trump’s complained that the Smithsonian dwells too much on “how bad slavery was” and his executive order titled “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History” nailed eight Smithsonian museums under White House review for having displays about “how unaccomplished the downtrodden have been” without, presumably, discussing the failure of their genes.
As a result of his administration’s racist pressure, the National Park Service is rewriting its exhibits on slavery at Independence Hall, one of the more prominent places where George Washington held people in slavery. It wasn’t that Washington was a racist, Trump would presumably tell you, but that the people he enslaved deserved it because of their inferior genes.
And much of the GOP is right there with him. Congressman Steve King spent years babbling about how white people have contributed more than “any other subgroup of people” to western civilization, warning that “we can’t restore our civilization with somebody else’s babies.”
Tommy Tuberville, when asked whether white nationalists should be allowed to serve in the military, answered, “I call them Americans.” Steve Scalise became House Majority Leader after bragging that he’d spoken to a 2002 convention of Klan Grand Wizard David Duke’s European-American Unity and Rights Organization. A reporter said he’d called himself “David Duke without the baggage,” although Scalese disputes it.
When Politico exposed a group of Young Republican leaders having a group chat that was filled with jokes about gas chambers and Hitler admiration, JD Vance called the negative reaction “pearl clutching.” Tucker Carlson hosted open racist Nick Fuentes on his show for a friendly hour, and the president of the Heritage Foundation went so far as to defend them both.
Trump’s acting undersecretary for public policy, Darren Beattie, says America should “pay smart people to have more kids, disincentivize stupid people from having kids,” and Bob Kennedy is pushing changes in Title X to implicitly encourage white women to have more babies.
None of this is new even to the modern GOP. In his first campaign stop after winning the Republican nomination for president, Ronald Reagan spoke to an all-white audience near Philadelphia, Mississippi, a few miles from where Klansmen sheriff’s deputies had brutally murdered 3 civil rights workers (it was made into the movie “Mississippi Burning”). His topic? “State’s rights.” And we all know what that means, as did his audience.
And in July 2016, Donald Trump Jr. stood on that same stage stumping for his father, and proudly bragged that Reagan had launched his campaign from it.
Trump’s “racehorse theory” of humanity is a racist lie that was built to justify slavery and Jim Crow, and then paved the road to Auschwitz.
Democrats and the media need to start saying so out loud every time he invokes it.
For some Americans, the reality of who Donald Trump really is is coming home to roost. And for the sailors trapped aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln, that moment has already arrived.
The Lincoln left San Diego last November. Nine months later, it is still at sea, its crew stretched past 250 straight days without meaningful relief. What was supposed to be a seven-month deployment has become closer to a floating humanitarian disaster.
Families have shockingly described broken toilets, moldy showers, food shortages, and sailors surviving on little more than rice and tortillas. It’s been called a “floating bucket of filth.”
So much for valuing the valor and bravery of our troops. To me, that’s Pete Hegseth’s “big lie.” He’s their worst nightmare. He doesn’t give a rat’s about the troops. Well, he does care about their “T” levels.
The Military Times broke the story that multiple sailors have tried to go overboard, and at least one was pulled from the water after an hour adrift. This is horrific and subhuman. Lawmakers from both parties are rightfully now demanding investigations.
But, besides Hegseth, who said the whole abominable ordeal is “completely misrepresented,” it won’t surprise anyone who understands the reality of Donald Trump that he, too, couldn't care less.
Asked whether the deployment had gone on too long and whether he was worried about the mental health of the more than 5,000 people aboard that ship, the insensitive and callous Trump seethed, "No. No. No." "Not nearly long enough," he added when asked if the ship had been at sea too long and, when queried about if families of those on board were right to be worried, he waved that off too: "No, they're not."
Then he, not surprisingly, like he does with everything else, blamed the press for covering it, accusing reporters of trying to turn warriors into victims.
As if the press loves to make up stories about sailors living in squalor and trying to take their own lives.
How despicable to blame the press while desperate families are pleading for answers. And Trump's response is that the suffering hasn't gone on long enough.
And that’s exactly how he feels about the nuisance of the American people’s suffering.
Remember the dolls and the pencils? When Trump was asked, point-blank, if his tariffs would raise prices on ordinary goods, he didn't apologize or explain or exude any understanding or compassion.
He shrugged his bulbous, bloated head and told the country that an 11-year-old girl doesn't need 30 dolls, three or four is plenty, and that nobody needs 250 pencils when five is sufficient.
He has said this more than once, because he genuinely believes the answer to rising costs is for regular families to simply cope with fewer pencils, dolls — oh, and make do with one piece of broccoli.
That's the same indifference he’s giving Lincoln's sailors. It's the same who-cares shrug he's giving anyone who has watched their grocery bill or their health insurance premium climb this year. Millions of Americans are having sharply higher health costs as pandemic-era subsidies lapse and insurers raise rates, a squeeze tied directly to the reconciliation package Trump signed and bragged about.
That “Big Beautiful Bill” was a metaphorical giant, cold slap in the face to middle-class Americans, who now understand why they can only afford three dolls and five pencils — if that.
And ICE agents are the literal giant, cold slap in the face to Americans’ shell-shocked visages. Agents have been turned loose in cities, conducting the kind of aggressive street operations that have left residents frightened to leave their homes, arresting and detaining people at their will.
And that cold slap in the face will be replaced by a paralyzing electric charge once ICE agents get their new shock gloves. It’s been called “sadistic." Really? You think?
Those ICE wars on our streets coincide with the war with Iran that is responsible for stretching the Lincoln's deployment now past 200 days without a port call. That war has driven up fuel, shipping and scores of other costs. Trump’s reaction? He insisted he “loves” the inflation the war with Iran has caused.
Because this whole thing hasn’t been a punishment for us long enough. There’s lots more to come, which Trump is clearly giddy about.
He’s super-giddy about things that mean absolutely nothing to the rest of us. While we scrimp, save and suffer, Trump has kept his attention fixed on himself. Rising costs of groceries, gas, bills, etc? The Iran war? To Trump it’s a scenario of “wake me up when all this frivolous stuff is over” — again, metaphorically and literally too.
Because Dear Leader Donald has bigger fish to fry. Put his name on the Kennedy Center, pave over the Rose Garden, gild up the Oval Office with gold, bungle the Reflecting Pool, build an Arc de Trump, slap a helipad on the manicured South Lawn of the White House. And, the big kahuna, his luxurious Qatar jet.
While you stay home because you can’t afford to drive to your summer vacation, Trump is descending down a grand staircase in his flying palace. Let them eat cake? Who can afford cake? Let them eat the leftover pencils, if you have any.
He tells the parents of sailors on an aircraft carrier that nine months away from their kids "isn't nearly long enough," and tells a mom buying school supplies that her daughter has plenty of pencils already — which is ok, since she can snack on the extras.
It’s a blanket indifference whether he's talking about a sailor pulled out of the Arabian Sea or a grandmother deciding between groceries and her heart medication. Trump does not see suffering as a problem to solve, or something he should be inconvenienced by.
The sailors on the Lincoln are coming home soon, the Navy says, relieved — hopefully — by another carrier. The rest of us, though, have no relief in sight. We are just getting told that our suffering isn't nearly long enough.
Trump cuddles up to his dictator bestie while railing against the communist threat of the Democratic Party.
The latest from Raw Story's Nick Anderson, a Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist.
I've been fortunate enough to visit the White House several times, and what strikes you first, after you’ve seen pictures of it growing up, is how small it actually is. Not small in importance, of course, but small in square footage and size.
And I’ve been to the Oval Office three times, each time an awe-inspiring experience. And, again, it's really modest. I’ve been in corporate executive offices throughout my career that dwarf it. The press briefing room is tiny and cramped. I stood behind the lectern once, and I felt like I was looking down on a small hospital waiting room.
The Blue Room, the Gold Room, the East Room, even the grand-looking foyer you've seen in 100 photographs — in person, they're intimate, almost quaint. And that’s a good thing.
That's not by accident. The White House was designed to be dignified, not imperial. It was built by a country that had just fought a war to avoid having a king, and every architectural choice since has, I think, tried to reflect that restraint. It is elegant precisely because it doesn't try too hard.
That was the White House before Donald Trump turned it into a grotesque obscenity, like his language. The Oval Office today is slathered in cheap gold appliques and trim, gilded cherubs, reminiscent of the Grand Ballroom at Mar-a-Lago, perched above the doorways. Gold eagles, gold urns, a gold-plated phony FIFA trophy, gold, gold, gold. The Oval looks like a trashy casino lobby.
Outside, along the colonnade, is the horrific "Presidential Walk of Fame," gold-framed portraits of his predecessors, with one glaring exception: instead of a portrait of Joe Biden, there's a photo of an autopen, a juvenile jab dressed up as decor.
The Rose Garden lawn is gone too, paved over into a stone patio. The whole thing is maniacally monarchical.
And most devastating is Trump’s bulldozing and demolishing of the East Wing, on a whim, to make way for a 90,000-square-foot ballroom, a structure that will be larger than the White House itself, at a price tag way north of $400 million.
A federal appeals court ruled 2-1 this month that he had no authority to do this without Congress's approval, that "whether or not a massive ballroom should be constructed is for Congress to decide," not a matter for a maniacal monarch to rule on.
Trump called the ruling "horrendous" and "unjust" and on Friday filed an emergency appeal with the Supreme Court to let construction continue while he fights the lower court’s ruling.
The irony in this move is almost unreal. The billionaire bamboozler who slapped gold all over the people's house is now asking the Supreme Court, that has its own well-documented taste for gilded favors, to bless his gilded ballroom.
This is a court that has spent the last several years reliably ruling in favor of power and money over people. It gutted Chevron deference in Loper Bright, stripping federal agencies of the ability to protect workers, consumers, and the environment from corporate harm.
It ruled that cities can criminalize homelessness rather than house people. It let corporations sue unions into the ground for the economic fallout of a strike. And just this summer, in Trump v. Slaughter, it tore up nearly 90 years of precedent so Trump could fire independent watchdogs at will, gutting the very agencies meant to stand between big business and everyone else.
Then there's the court's own borderline criminal and massively covered-up relationship with wealth. Clarence Thomas, who hates anyone whose income falls below seven figures, spent decades quietly accepting superyacht vacations, private jet flights, and real estate favors from a billionaire megadonor, only disclosing any of it after journalists caught him.
The equally repugnant Samuel Alito took a luxury fishing trip on a hedge fund billionaire's jet, never reported it, and later ruled in that same billionaire's favor in a case worth billions.
This is a court that has no problem at all accepting gifts from precisely the class of people whose interests it keeps supporting in screwing over everyday people like you and me.
That said, don't expect this crooked court to suddenly discover a set, and I use this common man’s term intentionally, when a gold-obsessed, billionaire authoritarian leader asks permission to turn the modest White House into a monarch’s castle. If you take the court's recent history at face value, this should be an open-and-shut case for the side of extravagance.
Here's my prediction about what’s ahead for Trump’s ridiculous ballroom obsession, and it cuts two ways, both bad.
If the Court rules for Trump, expect the same disaster we've already seen with his other pet projects, which have been rushed, corner-cutting, done on the cheap with scant oversight.
The ballroom will follow the same botched work of the Reflecting Pool, helipad, Kennedy Center. It will be openly mocked and critiqued, just like the New York Times found with the ballroom being an architectural mess. It will be a never-ending money pit.
And speaking of pits. If the court rules against him, don't expect him to spend a dime of his own money finishing it properly or repairing what he tore down. He'll walk away, leaving a giant construction pit on the White House lawn, and let the next president clean up his mess, which is another pattern for Trump. When he messes up, someone else is left to clean up.
Either way, the ballroom will stand as a perfect monument to this dilapidated presidency, gaudy without taste, power, restraint, decorum, deference. It will stand as a total disregard for a national treasure that was never, ever his to remake in his own image. And a Supreme Court that has spent years proving whose side it's really on will have one more chance to prove it again.
“People are disappearing into this no man’s land. They have no connection to their new country, and they also apparently have no legal rights.” —Immigration rights attorney Alma David, quoted in The New York Times
“Terrible things are happening outside... poor helpless people are being dragged out of their homes. Families are torn apart; men, women and children are separated. Children come home from school to find that their parents have disappeared.” — Anne Frank diary entry January 13, 1943
Authoritarianism doesn’t just begin when a government embraces brutality. It steps in on cats’ feet when brutality becomes politically useful, legally routinized, and morally acceptable because a government has first declared its victims undeserving of our empathy. When average people in the bureaucracy just “do their jobs” inflicting horrors on other humans simply because they’ve been declared “the other.”
Outside of military coups like Pinochet’s Chile, countries don’t generally slide from republican democracies into totalitarianism and fascism in a single step. There’s a process, and it always begins with the government deciding that some people simply don’t deserve the basic human rights that have been foundational to western civilization for centuries.
The Trump regime’s treatment of Roberto Mosquera, profiled at length in the New York Times by Nicholas Casey, shows just how far down this terrible road we’ve already traveled.
Mosquera has been held for a year without trial or legal due process in a maximum security prison in the tiny landlocked southern African country most people have never heard of, Eswatini, one of the world’s few remaining pure kingdoms that was formerly known as Swaziland. The 59-year-old father of four is slowly going blind from untreated glaucoma, and apparently will be held there for the rest of his life.
He first came to America at the age of 12 as part of the 1980 Mariel boatlift from Cuba. He fell in with a local Hispanic gang and ended up being accused of shooting a member of a different gang in the leg (he insists he didn’t do it and wasn’t there at the time). He served his time in an American prison and, when he got out, reinvented his life.
He became a born-again Christian, got married and had four American citizen daughters, and became a plumber, rising through the ranks to foreman. The Times quoted his former boss as saying he’d turned his life around and:
“He wasn’t just a hard worker; he inspired the guys around him,” he said.
He was also in the United States legally (in part because Cuba isn’t accepting deportees), and checked in with the feds every year to renew his work permit. The last time he showed up, however, he was told his permit was being withdrawn and he was seized and taken through a series of brutal detention facilities and eventually put on a plane to Africa, a continent he’d never visited. As the Times notes:
“That was more than a year ago. Mosquera still sits in that same maximum-security prison with nowhere to go. No charges against him. No way to appeal his predicament. No sign that he will ever be freed. Cuba has not signaled any willingness to take him, and Mosquera says he has no desire to go there. Eswatini will not release him from prison, even though he served his time in the United States and committed no crime in Africa.”
In other words, we’re watching the creation of human beings who can be pushed outside the normal protections of law, geography, community, and ultimately even public attention. Roberto has been “disappeared” by Trump and Miller and is now in prison for what may be the rest of his life, and this all happened without his ever having stood before a judge or jury.
Our Declaration of Independence and Constitution were grounded in the idea that all humans are born with human rights, even though it took this nation centuries to get seriously close to living by its own creed.
Instead of referring to “citizens,” the Constitution repeatedly mentions “persons,” a word that encompasses all humans. Consider, for example, the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, part of the Bill of Rights:
4th Amendment: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
5th Amendment: “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury…; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” (emphasis added)
These, in part, constitute what’s called due process, which is repeated in the Fourteenth Amendment’s first section “…nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
Most of the tens of thousands of people ICE is now holding in its custody or who have been deported are there without ever having stood before an actual Article 3 judge. Their rights are being ignored.
The process the Trump regime is now pursuing is to obliterate what Holocaust survivor Hannah Arendt called, “The right to have rights.” In Chapter 9 (“The Decline of the Nation-State and the End of the Rights of Man”) of her book The Origins of Totalitarianism, she elaborated on what happened when the butchers, bakers, and shopkeepers got jobs in the Nazi detention camps:
“The conception of human rights based upon the assumed existence of a human being as such broke down at the very moment when those who professed to believe in it were for the first time confronted with people who had indeed lost all other qualities and specific relationships—except that they were still human. The world found nothing sacred in the abstract nakedness of being human.”
She realized that the gravest crisis of human rights is grounded in a government arguing, in its behavior, that some humans aren’t fully human and therefore aren’t entitled to basic human rights. A stateless person herself for 18 years, this idea of governments denying the basic humanity of less-favored groups was at the core of much of her writing.
With Roberto Mosquera and the thousands of others Trump and Miller are paying millions of our taxpayer dollars to foreign prisons to hold until they die, we’re watching play out here in America that very transition from a decent, rights-respecting government into a rogue and lawless regime.
We’ve danced with this before, of course. The entire history of the institution of slavery was grounded in the proclamation of the southern states that Black people weren’t fully human. More recently, George W. Bush humiliated America on the world stage by sanctioning torture and murder in Abu Ghraib and other foreign prisons and black sites, along with its assertion that Gitmo was beyond the reach of American human rights law or the US Constitution.
But this is a modern, whole-of-government approach to dehumanizing nonwhite people in the name of immigration enforcement, with a hundred-billion-dollar budget. And now ICE is buying electric shock gloves for themselves, to ratchet up the brutality.
Republicans in Congress funded, and the Trump regime has built, a massive machine to Make America White Again, considerations of “woke” concepts like rights be damned. And it’s growing and becoming more hostile to average Americans and their concerns by the day.
Nobody in a democratic republic should have the power to make people disappear. It’s antithetical to the very idea of our form of government.
When this regime has been relegated to the dustbin of history, we’ll have a hell of a big job reestablishing this country’s once-vaunted embrace of human rights. There will have to be either full-on trials or something like the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
We should be doing the planning now.
To co-opt a famed riddle about drug addicts and alcoholics: How do you know a member of the Trump Administration is lying?
Answer: Their lips are moving.
As we’ve come to learn, there are only three qualifications for someone getting hired by Trump:
No one embodies these qualities with greater fervor than Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who is so adept at dishonesty that he has taken even the concept of lying about lying to a level rarely achieved in political annals.
The only area where Hegseth exceeds his capacity for deceit is when it comes to his overall stupidity. And if you combine his duplicity with that utter incompetence, it produces something even more dangerous. In isolation, either would be bad enough. But in combination, the scariest part is the way one protects the other. Bad judgment produces failure, dishonesty prevents accountability for the failure, and the absence of culpability guarantees that the dreadful reasoning survives, even thrives.
It's the perfect storm of horrible.
We can easily see Hegseth’s documented pattern of error followed by denial, exaggeration or self-exoneration in the current crisis enveloping the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln Naval aircraft carrier. This is the very same vessel that’s been carrying some 5,000 sailors and Marines for nearly nine months amid plummeting morale due to reported deteriorating conditions. These include moldy showers, long stretches without hot water, food shortages, out-of-service laundry facilities, disrupted mail and crew members losing their minds.
Hegseth naturally dismissed these concerns as “completely misrepresented” in terms of what’s really been happening. He assured reporters during a press gaggle in Panama that every ship has every amenity the Pentagon can provide.
Meanwhile, despite this supposed soft-peddling of any issues onboard what has been a record-setting deployment of the Lincoln that exceeded its planned mission by some three months, the U.S. Navy is rushing the aircraft carrier U.S.S. George Washington to the Asia-Pacific region to relieve the Lincoln despite its supposedly being just fine.
Yes, of course it’s all a great big lie. That goes without saying. In this case and every case, actions speak louder than untruthful words. Insincerity lay at the heart of everything these people do or utter, designed to cover for their fabrication and idiocy.
Yet somehow, this story has impacted me to a far greater degree than the usual administration horse manure. Word has leaked that these military forces on the Lincoln had grown so miserable while being trapped on what was essentially a floating prison that some were suicidal and attempted to jump overboard.
The only reason word leaked out about the abysmal conditions on the ship was that family members were revealing it in defiance of threats not to embarrass the military or else. And then when it finally did hit the media, it was naturally dismissed as – all together now – FAKE NEWS.
As is the case every time, this corrupt administration has a remarkable explanation/solution for every inconvenient reality it confronts: deny it. It’s always worked for Donald Trump, as taught by his mentor Roy Cohn once upon a time. If the facts don’t work well for the current situation, attack them as false. If that doesn’t work, condemn the reporters. Always question the credibility of anyone who doesn’t adhere to the company line.
Try to imagine this: we are supposed to believe that sailors and cadets and their families with nothing to gain all independently fabricated a story to demean and embarrass the Pentagon and upset Hegseth.
I also read a story Friday about how “Democratic senators have begun raising concerns about the extended deployment” of the carrier. That’s reassuring. But what about the Republican senators? Are horrid living conditions for active members of the military somehow a partisan issue? Where is the outrage from Republican members of Congress demanding access to the ship.
This is the same party that has spent decades telling us they’re the ones who support the troops. The center of the GOP is its love for those doing their patriotic duty — or so it claims.
Apparently, in the face of such lies, those senators and representatives have dropped the ball on doing their job. No demands for answers. No righteous indignation. Just deafness and blindness when it’s their party driving the fiasco. Coming to the rescue of these troops can’t hold a candle to the promises they can’t disavow quickly enough when faced with an opportunity.
Why should it matter who is in charge when servicemen and women are victimized by a government that evidently prefers platitudes to adequate resources?
These are people serving their country, not disposable pawns who can easily be ignored when their needs become too public and distressing. They did not sign up for incompetent leadership, inadequate nourishment and medical care, unclean water, dysfunctional sanitation and a lack of mental health assistance when things go south. When they’re victimized, for whatever reason, you don’t sweep their issues under the rug because they’ve made you look bad.
What is it going to take to prove that things have gone completely off the rails if not sailors feeling so despairing that they’re trying to abandon ship? I mean, for God’s sake, the one thing everyone ought to be able to agree on – Democrat or Republican, Black or white, young or old, rich or poor, blue or red – is that we need to take care of the people defending our nation.
If you’re the secretary of defense and you can’t be bothered to make sure the people you are charged with overseeing receive the bare basics to sustain them physically and emotionally, maybe it’s time to dump him and find a guy who can.
I know that actual competence is a radical concept today. But maybe it’s worth a shot. Take a good look at where ineptitude has landed us.
(Ray Richmond is a longtime journalist/author and an adjunct professor at Chapman University in Orange, CA.)
Horrifically underqualified and monstrous Secretary of Defense Peter Hegseth should never have been confirmed by the Senate. Even Mitch McConnell, along with Lisa Murkowski and a "concerned" Susan Collins, voted no. Mitch almost always votes party first, but not this time. Now, every other Republican senator and Donald Trump are on the hook for allowing Hegseth's mismanagement to all but kill our brave and committed sailors.
On November 21 last year, the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln set sail from San Diego to the Middle East, prepared for war as it always is, but unaware of the oncoming issue with Iran, one that began February 28 of this year. Thus it is that the first shots fired from aircraft based on the Lincoln occurred three months into its deployment, or roughly halfway before it would normally be scheduled to return to San Diego for rest, relief, repair, and restocking.
Now, someone in the Defense Department, and surely Hegseth as the ultimate authority, should have, the moment Trump ordered the military to unleash hell on Iran, made clear in the Pentagon, "Well, now we have to absolutely get ready to deal with the Lincoln as it approaches six months, maybe extend a month, but definitely have options there to get it back at that point. We need another one ready asap."
That only makes sense. And yet apparently no one did.
Perhaps even less defensible, reports state that not only is the carrier still at war — not just on duty, but war — nine months into this assignment, but has also been woefully undersupplied for months, a violation of an absolutely sacred duty. If you simply must have those sailors serve their country due to the inescapable aspects of war, with the action taking much longer than envisioned, then it is incumbent upon the richest nation to ever grace the planet, the one that spends well over a trillion a year on the Defense Department, to restock the massive floating city, at the very, very least.
And yet not only is the ship needing repairs, stinking more than usual due to lack of maintenance regarding plumbing issues, among many others, but the food is running out at a rate that is becoming unsafe. Taken all together, the assignment, the stress, and the lack of care have all led to the worst problem: the exceedingly dangerous environment now causing severe mental health concerns, concerns so undeniable that it is unforgivable that Hegseth still serves in his position.
At least one sailor was rescued after jumping overboard, and others have come close to trying.
As reported by the Military Times, "Annabelle Loma has spoken with her husband only a few times since he attempted to jump overboard from the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln during his current deployment." It is heartbreaking: "He’s scared. He thinks he’ll get a dishonorable discharge, and just because he was burnt out, his 13-year career is ruined, just like that. That’s not fair, that’s not right."
No, it's not. And it wouldn't be right if he was the only one, except he's not.
Thirteen years in, having built up significant retirement accounts and skills, taken away due to serious illness? Horrific to consider. (An illness is an illness; mental illness is now accepted as real, debilitating, and not a "fault.")
In yet another incident, a sailor on watch saw a shipmate preparing to go overboard, and intervened. The on-the-spot hero "called out to the sailor before reaching the individual and grabbing their arms, pulling them onto the deck." Three others heard the commotion and came running to help. We are so thankful help was there.
It might be even worse because the Navy won't release the number of suicide attempts or serious self-harm incidents. Given we know of at least three, the silence regarding the total number might indicate an even bigger problem. All but unbelievable.
Families have been calling the Navy in fury, terrified of the stress inundating their loved ones and the sailors' degrading mental and physical health. Few of them complain — tough families — but some of them must also be endangered themselves due to the worry about their family member as well as their own stress living without them.
Unacceptable. Outrageous. And, again, unforgivable.
But the Navy has a fix on the way! Except maybe not. It is preparing the USS Theodore Roosevelt, a carrier to relieve the Lincoln. But the Navy has not provided a timeline, citing operational security.
Nonsense. "Operational security?" There is an aircraft carrier patrolling the area. Announcing when the replacement is coming means nothing about nothing to Iran. It is not like the new carrier has double super secret tricks to win the war. And even if it did, telling the Iranians it's on the way might help bring an end to everything.
Those of us who've never been on anything bigger than a bass boat have enough common sense to know that if the Navy is dealing with suicide attempts, there are many other moderate-level mental illness concerns that need evaluation. Other problems extend right on down to running out of sandwiches and blocked toilets, and they don't even know the date on which they'll get relief, nor when these problems might get fixed, even at sea.
In other words, the situation is not getting better any time soon.
People need to lose their jobs over this. But Hegseth, the man ultimately in charge, is apparently too busy firing brown people, women, and members of our LGBTQ community. Evidently, he doesn't have time to address any of this. He is the one who needs to be thrown overboard, so to speak.
There are very few presidential and Cabinet-level duties that by nature rise to the degree as to be called sacred. And this critical duty surely must encompass taking the best care of our active military members and veterans suffering from related issues. When the price of just one B-2 Stealth Bomber is $2.1B, the fact that the ship lacks even some of the most basic supplies offends those of us who lack the bravery to even serve.
Nearly everyone reading this column who, upon learning that some crew members were getting half a cup of rice and two tortillas as "meals," and having a trillion-dollar budget at our disposal, would order 24-hour shifts and full speed ahead until a supply ship or ships plural set sail to at least relieve the food situation.
"But we don't have any ships available, sir."
"Then buy one! I want a ship, find one, buy one, rent one, steal one, just a regular big cargo ship. And then fill it. I don't care if you have to make the biggest Costco run in history; get the stuff. I don't care if we have to do an airlift with a dozen planes to Qatar and dock for 24 hours to load it. If it's not done by Friday, no one needs to come in Monday because they're already terminated."
Everyone reading this would surely make the same order. But on Wednesday, Hegseth was busying himself in Panama, speaking at the Americas Counter Cartel Coalition (“Shield of the Americas”) forum. While our sailors at war are becoming severely mentally ill, perhaps partly due to running out of food and a newsworthy stench due to a newsworthy plumbing issue, Hegseth's mind was on gunning down drug runners delivering whatever, as if those bombs will solve anything.
How difficult would it be to say to "someone" at the Pentagon? "Find 50 plumbers in Virginia, draft them into temporary service with very good pay, fly them to Qatar, and helicopter them to the ship. Fix it to at least show we care about the sailors enough to fix that issue."
Instead, he also found time to yank the security clearance from Frank Kendall, President Biden's Air Force Secretary, perhaps for complaining about how this administration manages this war.
This one is easy. This is entirely on Hegseth, and since he has had ample notice of the problem — that carrier dinghy has been out there nearly nine months, ample time to come up with solutions — we've almost lost some of our best people, not from an Iranian bomb, but due to stress, depression, and other mental illness concerns. Trump needs to fire Hegseth yesterday.
And because Trump likely won't, despite being the Commander in Chief and being the one truly at the top to order this fixed — without doing so, he needs to be fired, too. That won't happen. He won't be fired despite worrying more about the useless "battleships" named after him than getting some sirloins, baked potatoes, and Cesar salad to our sailors, or at least cheeseburgers, fixing the toilets, getting one of our other 10 (!) carriers to the region, and diagnosing life-threatening illnesses of our sailors, physical or mental. They should be flying them home for treatment no different than had they lost a leg in combat, with no different consequences.
Managing military strategy and deployment can often seem so complicated as to be beyond comprehension. This isn't one. This seems like one any reader can fix. The only requirement is the empathy needed to solve the situation.
Hegseth apparently doesn't care enough. It is time to put him through some stress concerning a job, be fired for dereliction of duty or reckless endangerment under the Uniform Code of Military Justice if done through the Pentagon, or at least fined for one of the biggest OSHA violations of all time if a civil matter.
Our expectations are never higher than when the duty is sacred. Such a matter requires the most sensitive of study, the most intense focus on resulting problems, the commitment to go insane themselves, and screaming at people to fix this or they be the ones discharged. Such a person must also have the ability to talk to families, assure them they care, that the matters will be addressed immediately, and apologies extended.
Simply unforgivable. The easiest case for termination ever.
Jason Miciak is a Raw Story Columnist, former editor of Occupy Democrats, author, political consultant, attorney, and single parent girldad. Please follow on Bluesky, and he can be reached at jasonmiciak@gmail.com, and he appreciates comments or thoughts below.
Trump just took steps to make it very difficult to prosecute money laundering, a crime he and his real estate buddies may well have been committing much of their felonious lives.
This month, we learned that Capital One Bank closed more than 300 Trump Organization accounts back in 2021 because, they said, their internal fraud department had flagged illegal money-laundering activity. But on who’s behalf?
We know from the Mueller Report and public reporting that Putin spent millions and did his best via social media and hacking the DNC to get Donald Trump into the White House in 2016, and was probably doing the same in 2020 and 2024.
But what if there was a way for him to simply drop, say, $100 million right into political campaigns here in America that would back up or benefit Trump and his notorious crime family? Or simply give the money to Trump himself as thanks for screwing Ukraine and destroying America?
While federal law prohibits foreign governments, citizens, and corporations from spending money to influence our elections, the reality is that laws only work when there’s somebody to investigate crimes and enforce them.
And Trump is, right now, tearing apart the very institutions and transparency rules that we’d need to expose such a crime.
Specifically, our Treasury Department — run by Trump’s billionaire crony Scott Bessent — just this week put into place a new rule that would hand Putin that ability. Or any other foreign oligarch who wanted to use a shell corporation to buy his very own American politician.
Senator Sherrod Brown’s Corporate Transparency Act required corporations and LLCs to tell the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, FinCEN, who actually owns or controls them. That remote control, often handed through multiple shell companies, is called “beneficial ownership.” It’s all about finding out who, ultimately, benefits from the corporation or LLC’s activities.
This week, though, Bessent issued a new rule that not only ends that requirement but also directs the agency to delete all the beneficial-ownership information they currently hold on U.S. persons (like Donald Trump and his kids) that could be used to prove past money laundering crimes.
This is critical stuff because money laundering is how drug money, bribes, stolen government money, tax evasion proceeds, or money belonging to a sanctioned oligarch can be pushed through corporations, trusts, real estate, banks, casinos, and multiple transactions until figuring out who originally supplied it becomes extraordinarily difficult, if not impossible.
And money laundering via real estate in America is a big, big business. As the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project notes in a report titled “U.S. Real Estate is No 1 Destination for Laundered Dirty Money,” we have “the weakest regulatory framework to counter real estate money laundering” among all of the G7 nations. They add:
“At least US$2.3 billion has been laundered over the past five years through U.S. real estate…” and “More than 80% of all U.S. cases involved money coming from abroad, and in 82% of cases, anonymous shell companies or complex corporate structures helped mask the identity of the property’s real owners.”
Most countries made this illegal decades ago, in some cases generations ago. And in the past decade, Canada, Australia, and the United Kingdom have tightened their own requirements to prevent this kind of money laundering, which in each of those countries and the U.S. was mostly done through anonymous or all-cash real estate transactions done by shell companies.
And Trump and Bessent just killed off the cops on the beat here.
Trump’s apparently been up to his eyeballs in money laundering for much of his business career. As he wasted the ~$400 million he got from his father, he repeatedly turned to Russian and other oligarchs to prop him up after multiple bankruptcies via these very kinds of real estate transactions that the Treasury will no longer be looking at.
In 2015, Trump’s Taj Mahal casino admitted to willful and repeated violations of federal anti-money-laundering laws. FinCEN fined Trump $10 million because, for some unknown reason (wink, wink), he failed to even bother to keep the required records that would have revealed criminal money laundering being done through his casinos.
Then there’s all that Russian money. Back in 2008 as Putin was consolidating his iron grip and quickly becoming a billionaire bloated with ill-gotten gains himself, Uday — er, Don Jr. — bragged to an audience at a real estate conference that Russians were “a pretty disproportionate cross-section” of the money flowing into the Trump Organization, adding:
“We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia.”
Qusay — er, Eric Trump — similarly bragged to Golf writer James Dodson, according to Dodson, that:
“We don’t rely on American banks. We have all the funding we need out of Russia.”
Reuters looked into it all in 2017 and found that at least 63 people with Russian passports or addresses had bought $98.4 million worth of property from Trump, roughly a third of that being owned by LLCs that were so impenetrable that Reuters couldn’t discover who was actually behind the Russian front men. (This sort of deal is exactly why Congress passed the Corporate Transparency Act in 2021.)
Trump’s SoHo property is another example. A lawsuit brought by Kazakhstan’s BTA Bank alleged that Trump associate Felix Sater helped Ilyas Khrapunov disguise about $3 million as down payments on three Trump SoHo condominiums as part of an alleged international money-laundering scheme involving money stolen from Kazakhstan.
And now the Trump administration is weakening the exact system designed to tell investigators who is actually behind these opaque corporations that serve as real estate money-laundering fronts for offshore criminals like Putin and his cronies.
Treasury has now not only eliminated their previous domestic beneficial-ownership reporting, FinCEN has also given banks a pass on beneficial-owner verification requirements when companies open additional accounts, and Bessent delayed until 2028 a separate anti-money-laundering rule for investment advisers.
And if a foreign actor wants to use his ill-gotten gains to influence an American election? Thanks to Trump refusing to appoint a needed member, the Federal Election Commission (FEC) doesn’t even have the quorum it needs to conduct its own enforcement of rules against foreigners jumping into our elections. Its own website repeatedly says it can’t function again until “the Commission regains a quorum.”
So, suppose Putin or one of his buddies throws millions of dirty Russian money into a corporation in that country, which then transfers that money into an American shell company run by a Trump crony, which then “legally” (under Citizens United) puts that money into a Trump-aligned SuperPAC, say “Patriotic Americans for Freedom LLC,” to pay for political advertising, on-the-ground operations, etc.
The required FEC filing says that the money came from “Patriotic Americans for Freedom LLC,” but who’s behind that company that’s funding the campaign? That’s exactly the question that the “beneficial ownership” laws were designed to answer, and will now lead to a door slammed shut in the face of any reporter, investigator, or law enforcement agency that tries to look into it. And the FEC itself is paralyzed from doing anything about it.
So, here we have a regime headed by a guy who made much of his fortune via opaque foreign money — apparently much of it from Russia — and now he’s dismantling our ability to see who’s behind it. And deleting all the previous records that might have offered a clue to his own past crimes.
For Putin, throwing a few hundred million dollars into an American election would be pocket change, as it would be for the murderous dictator of Saudi Arabia or any other country that wanted a particular outcome from Trump or his corrupt lickspittles in the GOP.
And we know these foreign billionaires and dictators have a vested interest in how our system works; if they didn’t, they wouldn’t be throwing literally billions of dollars into Trump family operations, from Trump’s crypto to Jared’s investment fund.
Forget making America great again; Trump is doubling down on making money laundering — which may have been the source of his financial survival throughout his 90s and early 2000s bankruptcies — great again.
This is truly the single most corrupt administration in American history.
Back in the days when conservatives were so hungry for media platforms that they’d come on progressive shows, I used to regularly debate Wayne Allen Root (here and here, for example). Instead of trying to convince me, though, Root has recently taken to giving Trump ideas about things to do, like stealing the election this fall.
On his show on “Real” America’s Voice, Root told Trump:
“Let me put an idea in your head. Because it’s so hard to get the Senate to do anything, now they’re on recess, they never get anything done. If they never get the SAVE America Act done, you have the right to declare a national security emergency for elections. …
“And the Supreme Court ruled in 1983, under Reagan, in INS vs. Chadha that if you declare a national security emergency as the President of the United States, they can’t challenge it. It can only be overturned by a two-thirds vote of both houses of Congress.
“So if you do this in the next month, we will get photo ID, proof of citizenship, and a limit to mail-in ballots, and you don’t even need the Senate’s vote.”
Trump seemed both unsurprised and unfazed, as if this were a regular topic of conversation in the White House.
“Let me just say that stranger things have happened,” he replied, adding, “OK, I’ll leave it at that.”
Since 1968, stealing elections has become a sport for Republicans. That was the year that Nixon was running for president against VP Hubert Humphrey — who had just successfully negotiated peace between North and South Vietnam — when Nixon had his people reach out to the leaders of South Vietnam and promise them riches if they’d refuse to go to Paris and sign the deal.
When the FBI informed President Johnson about it, he correctly called it “treason,” although we didn’t learn about it until years later when the LBJ Library released the tapes.
In 1980, it was Reagan’s turn to steal an election. Jimmy Carter was riding high in the wake of Nixon’s resignation and VP Agnew’s stepping down to avoid a bribery prosecution, but then the Iranians seized the American embassy in Tehran.
The president of Iran, Abolhassan Bani-Sadr, wanted to release the hostages and had worked out a deal with Carter to do just that, but the Reagan campaign met with the Ayatollah’s people and promised to sell them weapons and military spare parts if they’d just hold the hostages until after the election, destroying Carter’s re-election chances.
The hostages were released, by way of sealing the deal, at the exact moment when Reagan put his hand on the bible to be sworn in, and for years Reagan shipped them banned weaponry until the deal was busted wide open as the Iran-Contra Scandal.
In 2000, Republicans knew the election would probably come down to Florida, the state then run by candidate George W. Bush’s brother Jeb, so Jeb had his secretary of state purge at least 50,000 Black people from the voting rolls just months before the election. His brother won the state, and thus the White House, by 537 votes: it would have been an epic loss without that last-minute voter purge. And then five corrupt Republicans on the US Supreme Court shut down the Florida Supreme Court-mandated recount, which would’ve revealed the purge.
None of these Republican election thefts are controversial; all are well-documented.
As was Trump’s willingness to see his own Vice President, Mike Pence, hanged by an angry mob if that was what it’d take to keep Donald in the White House for another four years. It’s safe to assume that if he was okay with that, there’s nothing off the table for this fall.
While Trump’s legal power to seize control of our election this fall is in dispute, his ability to disrupt it isn’t.
— He’s already issued an executive order directing the Post Office to refuse to deliver ballots to or from citizens not on his approved voter list or in states that refused to give him their voter rolls. Postmaster General David Steiner says he’s willing to do what Trump wants.
— A federal judge back last October ordered ICE to provide his court with the details of ICE’s plans for this fall’s election and, 10 months later, they’re still stonewalling, refusing to turn over any internal documents.
— Reuters reported last month that White House officials had already discussed declaring a national emergency and creating a federal voting task force, including ways of bypassing the Election Assistance Commission and seizing control of voting and vote-tabulating machines.
— Voters in 41 states have election deniers on the ballot this fall, while dozens of known election deniers have taken control of election-running positions across the country.
So, given that the feds are not only not going to help but are actively working toward rigging or even seizing control of this November’s election, it’s going to be up to us and the individual states to make sure our voices are heard and our votes are properly counted.
We should be thinking of this as an election continuity exercise that may not be necessary but, like wearing a seatbelt, could be essential if Trump tries to repeat 2020 in some way. At the moment, he’s essentially a cornered rat.
Therefore, Democrats must:
— Educate Americans about the Constitution, which hands elections off to the states exclusively with only minimal federal standards.
— If Trump tries to claim a national emergency — even if it has a real basis, like Iran hitting us hard or some other 9/11-type event, Americans need to know that we held elections through the War of 1812, the Civil War, the Republican Great Depression, both World Wars, and through other times of national crisis, and 2026 must not be an exception.
— States need to prepare for litigation with complaints, TRO motions, and even appellate briefs composed and ready to file on a moment’s notice. Taking days to fully respond to a Trump attempt to blow up our elections could be disastrous, as Al Gore learned 26 years ago.
— Involve Republicans when we can find the rare ones who will put country above party. Republican Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger of Georgia pushed back in 2021 when Trump tried to get him to “find” roughly eleven thousand ballots; we must be looking for other Republicans who may have enough integrity to resist a Trump-led coup attempt.
— Steel the spines of our election administrators by having their backs, both legally and physically. Secretaries of state, county clerks, election boards and governors should all know in advance exactly who has authority to order what. The last thing we want are thousands of local election officials asking, “Are we supposed to comply?” on Election Day. When coup attempts work it’s typically because they used the element of surprise to their benefit; we need to blunt that weapon.
— Prepare for Trump’s goons — federal (like ICE or the National Guard) or Proud Boys/Klan-types — around polling places. This is a violation of a federal law that dates back to the Civil War; it’s illegal for “troops or armed men” to show up at any polling places in the country, and the penalty is five years in prison.
— Encourage early voting and other ways to build redundancy into our election systems, and tell people to check their voter registration now at vote.org, particularly if they live in a Red state, as those states have been actively and aggressively purging their voting rolls for months now, especially in their blue cities.
— Be prepared for the corrupt Republicans on the Supreme Court to intervene, as they did in the 2000 election, to try to hand various elections to Republicans. They’ve already granted Trump sweeping immunity from criminal acts, presumably including election fraud.
— Finally, as Al Gore can tell you from sad experience, we need to prepare for the inevitable onslaught of rightwing propaganda calling elections into question and claiming fraud.
People old enough to remember how the GOP gamed this in Florida in 2000 know what I’m talking about; Republican congressional staffers flew down to Florida (along with John Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett) to pound on counting center windows and demand the election Al Gore won be given to the “rightful winner,” George W. Bush.
While Trump can’t legally cancel the election, the more he and his toadies can cast doubt on its legitimacy, the more likely it is that they can pull off the same type of coup as Republicans did in 1968, 1980, and 2000.
For over a decade now, close races immediately produce Republican claims of fraud: lawyers, election officials and communications systems must be fully prepared to deal with lies and propaganda long before November.
Contact your local elections office and volunteer to help out if you can; rightwingers are doing so right now, particularly in places where they can challenge mail-in vote signatures. We need to be there, too.
Better safe than sorry, as the old saying goes. Pass it along…
While slouched at his desk in the Oval Office this month, Islamophobe — among many other phobes — Donald Trump told reporters that a friend had suggested he start calling his political opponents "jihadists."
He made clear he had one candidate in mind — Dr. Abdul El-Sayed, the Michigan physician who won the Democratic Senate primary and would be the state's first Muslim senator.
He also posted a racist, side-by-side photo on Truth Social featuring himself and his estranged wife — what else do we call her, absent? — Melania Trump next to a photo of El-Sayed and his wife, Dr. Sarah Jukaku, who wears a hijab, to frame them as different, “other than” and “scary.”
Trump also intentionally emphasized the candidate’s full name, Abdulrahman Muhammad El-Sayed, a tactic he also uses to emphasize Barack Obama's middle name.
But it’s the jihadist moniker that had me thinking it takes one to know one. In this case, El-Sayed is not a jihadist, and it’s Trump who, in the broadest definition of the word, is.
A jihadist actually is someone who advocates or uses violence to impose religious rule by force. That doesn’t sound anything like El-Sayed. He is a doctor. His life's work has been keeping people alive, treating patients, running Detroit's health department, building a campaign around expanding healthcare access.
El-Sayed actually cares for people as opposed to someone like Trump who, for example, callously said that he loves inflation.
Back to jihadist. It’s an offensive Islamophobic slur aimed at a man whose only offense was winning an election while Muslim.
If we're going to use the word "jihadist" loosely, as a shorthand for someone who endangers lives in pursuit of an ideological project, it's worth asking who actually fits that description right now? Because to me, the answer is obvious.
On the same day Trump was hissing the slur, he was also signing an executive order that cuts the list of universally recommended childhood vaccines nearly in half. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Medical Association said the move puts children's health at risk.
So did Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, like El-Sayed a physician, a Republican, and the senator whose vote helped confirm RFK Jr. to lead Health and Human Services, a crime he will have to live with for the rest of his life.
In other words, Trump is an accomplice in killing children — that’s a cold, hard analysis that, in my estimation, will come to fruition in the years ahead.
That's one thread of a broader pattern. Trump pushed the country into an unnecessary, stupid, and impulsive conflict with Iran. In the process, he has humiliatingly depleted America's own munitions stockpiles, leaving less weaponry to protect U.S. troops and, by extension, ordinary Americans. Our lives are at risk because of Trump’s ignorance.
At Health and Human Services, the anti-vaccine nutcase RFK Jr. has overseen the departure of large numbers of career scientists and surrounded himself with vaccine skeptics, a combination public health experts say leaves the country much more exposed heading into the next pandemic. RFK Jr. has no medical background and no research creds — other than eating animal roadkill.
Trump knew what America was getting when he nominated the most unhealthy and lethal person to lead our nation’s health system.
At the FBI, a drunk and paranoid Kash Patel has presided over the loss of experienced agents and the hollowing-out of units that track domestic extremist threats, the very infrastructure meant to keep Americans safe from political violence.
What exists is an agency predominantly focused on Trump’s retribution campaign, and not on Americans’ safety. The FBI’s current incompetence is a time-bomb waiting to go off.
Under the Trump administration’s militarized and unchecked approach to domestic deportation, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations have repeatedly descended into fatal chaos, leaving a trail of bodies across the nation.
The fatal shootings of innocent citizens like Renee Good, Alex Pretti, Lorenzo Salgado Araujo and Joan Sebastián Durán Guerrero were carried out by a system of law that has become a state-sanctioned execution squad.
It's a strange thing to watch all of this unfold alongside a political coalition that includes Christian nationalism and self-described pro-life evangelical voters, a group that has become, arguably, the single most loyal bloc behind Trump. Yes, their support has declined, but so has the rest of his MAGA support.
By ignoring Trump’s own personal shortcomings, which are far too many to list here, and all the ways he’s endangering the lives of Americans, the religious right gets judicial appointments, restrictions on abortion and reproductive care, rollbacks on transgender rights, and an administration that has woven religious expression into federal institutions.
In Trump’s case, Christian nationalists fill out the rest of the religious extremism definition of jihadist.
OK, I get it, it’s a bit of a stretch because none of this is "jihad" in the literal, technical sense, and it shouldn't be described that way. But if the word is going to be thrown around loosely, as Trump did yesterday, then loosely applied it describes something closer to his own record. So, if anyone has earned the right to be called a jihadist, it’s Donald John Trump.
Dr. Abdul El-Sayed spent his career trying to keep people alive. It takes real audacity for the man attacking him to reach for the ugliest word he can find, on the very day his own administration was making decisions that public health experts say will put children's lives at greater risk.
If anyone in that Oval Office yesterday deserves scrutiny for policies that endanger American lives, it isn't the doctor running for Senate.
Copyright © 2026 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 |
Masthead
|
Privacy Policy
|
Manage Preferences
|
Debug Logs
For corrections contact
corrections@rawstory.com
, for support contact
support@rawstory.com
.