America First takes leap into jaws of recession
Nick Anderson is a Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist.
Nick Anderson is a Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist.
If I don’t get a full night’s sleep, I can’t function. I’m a wreck for the next two days. Yet Cory Booker, of New Jersey, stood on the floor of the United States Senate to give a speech that lasted 25 hours. He broke Strom Thurmond’s record, a feat made sweeter by the fact that Thurmond was a Dixiecrat who was trying to stop Black people like Booker from having a say in democracy, much less being a US senator.
It was a heroic achievement that, according to MSNBC columnist Hayes Brown, is lighting up the Democratic base. There has been “a maddening thirst for leadership from Democratic political figures,” Brown said today, with one poll showing a huge majority of Democrats – almost two-thirds – is tired of the party's compromises with Donald Trump. The question now, Brown said, is whether the congressional Democrats “can keep this energy going beyond this specific moment.”
“We need to see the party do this when there’s an inflection point, that is, when there’s a time where Republicans are demanding they move aside and they instead throw themselves upon the gears of the federal government,” he said. “It makes little sense to engage in such a protest when the stakes are lower and not do so when they’re much higher.”
Cory Booker suggested that he shared this view about Democratic leaders doing too much following of public opinion and not enough leading. The conventional wisdom in the party’s dominant faction, which is Chuck Schumer’s faction, is that the way forward is appealing to voters who are alienated by Trump’s economic policies, but only after his polling has fallen sufficiently. Twenty hours into his speech, however, according to Aaron Rupar, Booker said: “I'm not going to be a politician that's going to say 'we're going to do more for you.’ I'm going to be a politician, a leader, that demands more from America."
I cheered when I heard that. (I didn’t see the whole speech; like most people, I watched clips.) What he’s talking about is something I have called customer-service politics, in which Democrats force themselves to bargain with voters, especially white voters, in terms favorable to their greed, arrogance and stupidity. A multiracial democracy is good in and of itself, but Democrats tie themselves into knots arguing that it’s good for the economy and, therefore, in everyone’s self-interest. Most voters couldn’t recognize their own self-interests if you slapped it out their mouths. The sooner the Democrats drop that, the better.
While Booker’s comment can be read as a criticism of the party’s leadership, it could also be read as a criticism of the party’s base.
Here, context matters. He was talking about needing a new generation to redeem the promise of America. He said Trump “wants to divide us against ourselves, wants to make us afraid, wants to make us fear so much that we’re willing to violate people’s fundamental rights. … Don’t let him do that. Don’t become like him. … We can overcome this.
“Our American history is a perpetual testimony to the achievement of impossible things against impossible odds,” he said. “We are a nation that is great … I don't want a Disneyfication of our history. I don't want a whitewashed history, I don't want a homogenized history. Tell me the wretched truth about America, because that speaks to our greatness.”
It was in this context that Cory Booker gave voice to a less poetic but equally potent variation of John F Kennedy’s famous line: “Ask not what your country can do for you. Ask what you can do for your country.”
And it was in this context that I suspect some liberals and Democrats may have missed a finer, more profound point, which is that America is great, not in spite of “the wretched truth,” but because of it, and as a consequence of that, no matter how bleak things may seem, greatness is within us, all of us. It’s already there. We just have to activate it. Why is there a “maddening thirst for leadership”? You are what you seek.
This may seem like pie in the sky, but it’s not.
It’s hard liberalism.
Soft liberalism doesn’t make demands of individuals. It treats politics as entertainment, status-signaling, fashion. Citizens are not agents of democracy. They are buyers of things. It’s satisfied with complaining about unfairness and hypocrisy. It is happy to wait and wait and wait for public opinion to turn, all by itself, as if it were an act of God. It’s deeply morally ambivalent, free to indulge in pleasure-seeking and “leaving politics out of it,” as the material outcomes of elections are almost always felt by others. Evil isn’t really evil. It’s just ignorance or a misunderstanding. Soft liberalism is many things, but mostly, it’s easy.
Hard liberalism is the reverse in every sense. It makes high moral demands of individuals while sweeping them up in a story about the nation’s character. It asks them to fight injustice, uphold goodness, venerate community and respect competing views, even when, or especially when, there is disagreement. It asks us to take responsibility for the republic, if necessary to the point of personal sacrifice, as the late Congressman John Lewis did. (Booker referred repeatedly to Lewis and his choice to allow himself to be beaten nearly to death for the sake of liberty and justice for all.) Evil is evil and all you can do with it is fight it. Hard liberalism is many things, but most of all, it’s hard.
It’s soft liberalism that can be found in the first part of Booker’s quote: “I'm not going to be a politician that's going to say 'we're going do more for you.’” He’s not going to be like previous generations of Democrats who treated voters like consumers and bought into the idea that the customer is always right, even when the customer, especially the white one, is clearly greedy, arrogant and stupid.
It’s hard liberalism that can be found in the second part of Booker’s quote: “I'm going to be a politician, a leader, that demands more from America." He is part of a generation of Democrats that’s going to treat Americans as citizens and that inspires us into believing that we do not need a leader’s permission to act righteously. But most of all, he’s not going to be a leader who expects others to follow blindingly. You don’t need me. You already have greatness within you. Now act like it.
President Donald Trump’s midnight rant attacking four top Republican Senators appeared to reveal the President’s first big tariff test is off course, and may ultimately fail.
Democrats have proposed legislation to block Trump’s tariffs on Canada, one of America’s largest and oldest trading and military partners, by declaring Trump’s stated “national emergency” to have ended.
It appears Trump may lose this battle, at least in the Senate.
In his overnight tirade, Trump attacked four GOP Senators by name: Mitch McConnell, Rand Paul, Susan Collins, and Lisa Murkowski. Reports suggest they will join with Democrats to support the legislation to block his Canadian tariffs.
RELATED: ‘Just Plain Dumb’: Trump’s Smuggled Fentanyl Tariff Mocked
Last year, even before Trump won election, McConnell was a staunch “no” on tariffs.
“I’m not a fan of tariffs. They raise prices for American consumers. I’m more of a free trade kind of Republican that remembers how many jobs were created by the exports that we engage in,” the then-Senate Minority Leader told reporters.
McConnell is again a staunch no on tariffs, at least for Canada.
“I’m with you,” McConnell reportedly told U.S. Senator Tim Kaine (D-VA), who is sponsoring the legislation, CNN’s Haley Talbot reported.
“Kaine says rock solid GOP with him are Collins Murkowski Rand Paul and McConnell,” she added — the four Trump targeted.
It gets worse for Trump.
On Monday afternoon, U.S. Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) warned that Trump’s tariffs could cause farmers in his state “irreparable” harm.
“Anyone who says there may be a little bit of pain before we get things right need[s] to talk to my farmers who are one crop away from bankruptcy,” Tillis told CNN’s Manu Raju, as HuffPost reported.
READ MORE: ‘Paralyzed’: Johnson Mocked for Shutting House Down After ‘Brutal’ Defeat
“They don’t have time. So we’ve got to be crisp on this implementation,” he added. “Otherwise, we could do damage that is irreparable to farmers.”
While Tillis has not yet indicated how he will vote, there may be other Republicans supporting the Democrats’ legislation.
“At a press conference Wednesday afternoon, Kaine said other Republicans are also reaching out to him to get information on the resolution, indicating the number of GOP supporters may grow,” Politico reports. “Kaine also said Trump’s announcement about a new wave of tariffs, which is expected to take place prior to the Senate resolution vote, ‘could increase pressure for more [Republicans] to join.'”
Politico earlier on Wednesday reported that GOP Senators “Chuck Grassley — one of many farm-state Republicans concerned about the Canadian tariffs — and John Cornyn were noncommittal Tuesday about how they might vote.”
Should things go south for Trump, Vice President JD Vance will be on hand to cast a vote if the resolution is a tie.
Importantly, Politico observes, “the GOP dissent on the Hill represents a significant political rift in the party about the sweeping economic consequences of his sometimes-unpredictable trade policies.”
House Democrats are also launching a concurrent resolution to declare that the national emergency with Canada is over, Punchbowl News reports. That version is believed to face stiffer odds. Should both pass, Trump has said he will not sign them into law.
READ MORE: ‘Trying to Understand’: Senator Who Backed RFK Jr. Now on Defense After Massive HHS FiringGiven Gov. Ron DeSantis’ penchant for political theater, full embrace of a far-right extremist agenda, and need for attention, it’s not surprising that he would attach himself to the Trump-Musk DOGE project.
Despite the utter chaos the project has created at the federal level, DeSantis recently announced the creation of a Florida version of the Department of Governmental Efficiency (DOGE) task force, which he claims will target and eliminate “waste” in state government, save taxpayers money, and “ensure accountability” in Florida.
The Florida DOGE task force will work similarly to the “department” created by President Donald Trump and led by Elon Musk, the tech billionaire who is unelected and unaccountable to the American people. Musk and his minions have orchestrated the slashing of agency budgets since Trump came back into office on Jan. 20.
Florida Democratic Party Chair Nikki Fried’s response to the announcement captures the absurdity of DeSantis’ action.
Florida Democrat Chair Nikki Fried speaks at a press conference involving Occupy Tally on April 4, 2023. (Photo by Danielle J. Brown/Florida Phoenix)
“Republicans have been in total control of Florida’s government for nearly 30 years, and he wants to talk about government waste?” she said.
“Ron has consistently passed the largest state budgets in Florida’s history, illegally spent millions of taxpayer dollars to run political campaigns to take down Amendments 3 & 4, and just allocated $250 million to fund his political stunt on immigration. Don’t lecture us on wasting taxpayer dollars.”
Fried argues everyone knows “this isn’t about reigning in spending — it’s about Trump endorsing Byron Donalds instead of Casey DeSantis. Maybe Ron should have considered the political consequences before he decided to run against the leader of his party for president.”
DeSantis said the DOGE team will likely shutter 70 boards and commissions this year to cut costs. Meanwhile, the task force will review 900 positions in state agencies to ascertain whether they should be cut.
His intention to have the task force “identify potential wasteful spending in college and university operations” should be viewed as dubious after he signed legislation last year that banned public colleges and universities from using taxpayer money to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI).
The governor’s hostility towards Black Floridians and his crusade to eradicate any programs to level the social, political, economic, and business playing fields continue unabated. It’s likely that DOGE will be just another tool to eviscerate any entity deemed a threat to DeSantis’ implementation of an arch-conservative imprimatur on Florida.
There is also the fear that Florida will lose experienced civil servants who not only carry out critical government functions but also carry with them critical institutional memory. As it has played out nationally, the DOGE carousel will distract state employees from focusing on the people’s work.
If past is prologue, this political power move will increase fear among employees that they may lose their jobs, inducing paralysis among the ranks.
Most of all, Florida government’s best employees may seek greener pastures to the detriment to the state’s people.
DeSantis said the task force will use artificial intelligence to reduce “bureaucratic bloat.” He said the DOGE team will be a continuation of the cost-cutting measures he has overseen during his six years in office. The governor boasted that Florida saved $3.8 billion in last year’s budget and has paid down 41% of state debt since 2019.
DeSantis’ plan comes even though Florida has the lowest number of government employees per capita of any state, and the state has about $14.6 billion in cash reserves.
DeSantis’ plan comes even though Florida has the lowest number of government employees per capita of any state and $14.6 billion in cash reserves. Yet DeSantis is looking to slash 740 full-time jobs and scrap as many as 900 more related “off-the-books” positions.
Democrats pushed back by noting that Florida already has in place a voter-approved government efficiency task force created in 2006 that carried “an almost identical mandate;” Florida DOGE therefore itself is an example of unnecessary spending. The effort is really an attempt to flatter Trump and Musk to restore DeSantis to his party’s good graces.
If Floridians are lucky, the significant pushback verbalized by the leaders of both of Florida’s Republican-supermajority legislative chambers may end up with DeSantis’ cockamamie plan being tossed to the trash pile.
Sen. Ben Albritton via Florida Senate Speaker Daniel Perez via Florida House
“Let’s focus on what matters. Let’s pass actual reforms rather than symbolic gestures,” Daniel Perez, the Florida House speaker, told members on the legislative session’s opening day. “Let’s repeal government programs instead of reshuffling them. Let’s swing for the fences and not just try to get on base.”
Perez turned the knife a little deeper when he said that “DeSantis, a self-styled fiscal conservative, benefited from a 70% budget increase for the executive office of the governor over his six years in office.”
Senate President Ben Albritton, a member of the existing efficiency taskforce, said in remarks to the Senate that he was proud that Florida already “has a great framework for accountability,” and that he and other lawmakers had made a substantive number of recommendations “to improve flexibility [and] simplify processes.”
“The fact is we are a state and nation of laws that should be created by elected officials accountable to the people who elected them, not appointed professional staff,” he said.
None of this may matter though, because DeSantis has his eyes firmly set on running for the White House in 2028, which necessitates rebuilding the frayed ties with Trump and his loyal supporters, as well as positioning his wife Casey to run for governor when he sets down in 2027.
I have learned something important about the United States since Donald Trump took office for the second time. I have learned that most people most of the time will choose to believe in the existence of certain eternal rules that powerful figures must obey, even as those same powerful figures break those same rules over and over again.
Consider the rule about Social Security. It used to be seen as the “third rail” of American politics. If anyone touched it, they got zapped. The last time was in 2005, after George W. Bush’s victory. The backlash against attempts by the Republicans to privatize it contributed to the blue wave of 2006. It might have affected the 2008 election, as well.
This “rule of politics” is flimsier than anyone realized, though.
Instead of going through the Congress, the Trump regime is doing what it can to discredit the program in the eyes of the public. (Elon Musk infamously called it “the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time.”) Or it is doing what it can to make it harder for elders to get their money, which in turn further discredits the program in the eyes of the public.
The regime is cutting the Social Security workforce by the thousands. According to the Post, staffers who would normally fix run-of-the-mill problems, like computer “glitches that can stop payments,” are no longer going to be around to fix them. The Post said this could mean cases “get stuck” and “people could be out of benefits for months.”
Where do you go if payments don’t come?
You used to be able to call the Social Security Administration when there was a problem. Recently, however, the regime has put in place “anti-fraud” measures. These require elders to file online or in person. That wouldn’t be so bad if elders were computer-savvy (they are not) or if the regime were not also closing field offices around the country.
The result has been entirely predictable chaos and disorder. It’s gotten so bad that the Post said, in a different report published last week, that “Social Security is breaking down amid long waits, waves of calls and web crashes. A flood of cuts … has sent the agency into meltdown.”
Fortune asked the White House to comment on the Post story. A spokeswoman said Trump’s “resounding mandate from the American people” means he’s “moving quickly to fulfill his promise of making the federal government more efficient. He has promised to protect Social Security, and every recipient will continue to receive their benefits.”
But is the Social Security Administration really more efficient? The Post said phone lines are so jammed up that a field office told people to fax in their questions. “There is just no time to breathe or get anything else done,” the employee told the Post. “We used to be efficient.”
It used to be that if the Republicans wanted to privatize Social Security, and they did want that for decades, they had to persuade enough Americans that doing so was in their best interest. Time and again, they failed – they got zapped – and in that failure arose the belief that even powerful people had to obey certain eternal rules.
The Trump regime isn’t doing that.
Instead of persuading people to change Social Security, the regime is undermining the program itself under the guise of cutting “waste, fraud and abuse.” A likely consequence will be a loss of faith in the program by the public. At that point, the Republicans may be able to do whatever they want, even privatizing it in the name of efficiency.
If the rules are stopping you, don’t obey them.
Break them.
I would like you to consider another rule that most people most of the time believe is so certain and eternal that even Donald Trump must obey it. That’s the rule found in the US Constitution, in the 22nd Amendment. No president can serve more than two terms.
In an interview Sunday, Trump said he’s considering ways to run for a third. According to the Associated Press, he “elaborated later to reporters on Air Force One from Florida to Washington that ‘I have had more people ask me to have a third term, which in a way is a fourth term, because the other election, the 2020 election was totally rigged.”
AP: “Any attempt to remain in office would be legally suspect and it is unclear how seriously Trump might pursue the idea. The comments nonetheless were an extraordinary reflection of the desire to maintain power by a president who had violated democratic traditions four years ago when he tried to overturn the election he lost to Biden.”
This is not the first time Trump has talked about breaking the law and violating the Constitution, nor will it be the last, but everytime, someone somewhere tsk-tsks: what about that certain eternal rule? The AP quoted a constitutional law professor at Northeastern. He said “there are no credible legal arguments for him to run for a third term.”
That’s right!
There is no credible legal argument for serving more than two terms, just as there is no credible democratic argument for sabotaging Social Security so that 68 million elders become so desperate that they will accept any replacement, even if owned and operated by Wall Street.
The question isn’t whether it’s legal or constitutional to run again. We know it’s not. The question is whether there’s anyone powerful enough to stop a president whose criminal mindset tells him there’s no act that can’t be justified by the fact that no one is going to stand in the way.
In this, I’m talking about more than the congressional Republicans and the courts. I’m also talking about 68 million sick and elderly who are right now being forced to jump through hoops to get what’s rightfully theirs. Everyone presumes he’s gonna get zapped for touching the third rail. What few admit is he’s holding for ransom their literal security – be nice to me or I’ll make you jump through higher hoops.
And even if there is a backlash next year in the same way there was a backlash in the 2006 midterms, who’s going to suffer? Not Donald Trump. He doesn’t care about his party. The House Republicans might suffer a wipeout, but that’s not going to affect a president who’s already led one insurrection and is capable of leading another. In the context of a criminal president, “third rail” loses its usual meaning.
In saying this, I might be accused of losing hope, as if I’m suggesting Trump is all-powerful and there’s nothing we can do democratically.
I’m not saying that.
What I am saying is there is no hope if we continue believing, as most of us do, most of the time, that there are certain eternal rules that are going to stop Donald Trump from doing what he wants, as if a criminal mindset like his would ever honor the rules. The rules are only as valuable as the people who are willing to use them to fight back.
It’s not that he can’t do something.
It’s that good people will try to stop him from doing it.
NOW READ: What the past week also reveals about the Trump team's utter incompetence
“In my work with the defendants [at Nuremberg], I was searching for the nature of evil and I now think I have come close to defining it. A lack of empathy. It’s the one characteristic that connects all the defendants, a genuine incapacity to feel with their fellow men.” — Captain Gustave Gilbert, the US army psychologist assigned to observe the Nazi defendants at the Nuremberg trials.
You don’t expect moral leadership from mice. And yet, in a recent study, rodents showed more empathy, urgency, and compassion for strangers than the men currently shaping our nation’s future. While lab mice display empathy by resuscitating unconscious cage-mates, Trump and Musk gleefully slash food aid, housing support, and global relief efforts — all cheered on by a right-wing movement that now sees empathy as a fatal weakness.
Back in the days when I was rostered by the State of Vermont as a psychotherapist and ran a residential treatment facility for severely abused children, one of the things I was painfully aware of was the lack of empathy (the ability to experience or identify with the feelings of others) displayed by psychopaths.
Frankly, I couldn’t avoid them; at least half the parents of the kids in our care were easily identified as psychopaths or diagnosable with Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD). Watching today’s GOP I’m getting flashbacks.
And this embrace of psychopathy isn’t something new for Republicans; their disdain for empathy has deep roots that reach back a half-century or more.
Most recently, this broke into public consciousness when Elon Musk trash-talked empathy in an interview with Joe Rogan:
“The fundamental weakness of Western civilization is empathy. The empathy exploit. They’re exploiting a bug in Western civilization which is the empathy response. I think empathy is good, but you need to think it through, and not just be programmed like a robot.”
The “they” who are “exploiting” the “bug” of empathy are, of course, Democrats who believe one of the jobs of government is to provide for “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” And average Americans who think we should help the helpless, feed the hungry, heal the sick, house the homeless, provide a safety net for our elders, and care for and educate our children.
You know, like Jesus said in the Sermon on the Mount and Matthew 25.
That, in fact, is what’s normal not just for humans but for all mammals; empathy is one of the universal characteristics across our class of animals, as any pet owner can tell you. In a remarkable study published in the peer-reviewed journal Science last month, researchers knocked out mice with anesthesia and let them be found by other mice.
Even when they’re total strangers, the conscious mice did everything they could — including a mouse-like form of CPR — to revive their companions. They felt empathy and acted on it.
Contrast this with Republicans who shrug when told that millions will die because of the cutoff of USAID assistance to poor nations that cost a mere .3% of our federal budget. Or who sneer at people who need Medicaid, school lunches, or Social Security Disability aid.
Just during the past few weeks, Trump has cancelled a billion dollars worth of support to food banks here in America, another billion to help low-income people pay for housing, and is taking an axe to Social Security. And he and Musk are gleeful about it.
How did it get this bad?
The Republican embrace of apathy/cruelty/antipathy/sociopathy really began to take form in the late 1970s and early 1980s as what became the Reagan movement enthusiastically embraced the writings and teachings of Ayn Rand and her Objectivist/Libertarian worldview.
Ayn Rand’s novels have informed libertarian Republicans like former Speaker of the House of Representatives and current Fox News board member Paul Ryan, who required interns to read her books when they joined his staff.
As Paul Crider writes for The Bulwark:
“Many among the Silicon Valley ultra-rich dominating the news think of themselves as heroes out of an Ayn Rand novel. Elon Musk and Marc Andreessen prate on about how we are living in Atlas Shrugged now. Peter Thiel has spoken at the annual gala of the Randian Atlas Society. These figures and their peers are discussed in the popular press with frequent reference to Rand.”
Similarly, back in 2015, Donald Trump told USA Today’s Kirsten Powers that his favorite book was Ayn Rand’s raped-girl-decides-she-likes-it novel, “The Fountainhead.”
“It relates to business, beauty, life and inner emotions,” he told Powers. “That book relates to … everything.”
Powers added, “He [Trump],” told her that he “identified with Howard Roark, the protagonist who designs skyscrapers and rages against the establishment.”
Rand’s hero Roark, in fact, “raged” so much in her novel that he blew up a public housing project with dynamite.
Rand, in her Journals, explained where she got her inspiration for Howard Roark and the leading male characters in so many of her other novels. She writes that the theme of The Fountainhead, for example, is:
“One puts oneself above all and crushes everything in one’s way to get the best for oneself.”
On Trump’s hero Howard Roark, she wrote that he:
“…has learned long ago, with his first consciousness, two things which dominate his entire attitude toward life: his own superiority and the utter worthlessness of the world. He knows what he wants and what he thinks. He needs no other reasons, standards or considerations. His complete selfishness is as natural to him as breathing.”
It turns out that Roark and many of her other characters were based on a real person. The man who so inspired Ayn Rand’s fictional heroes was named William Edward Hickman, and he lived in Los Angeles during the Roaring Twenties.
Ten days before Christmas in 1927, Hickman, a teenager with slicked dark hair and tiny, muted eyes, drove up to Mount Vernon Junior High School in Los Angeles and kidnapped Marion Parker — the daughter of a wealthy banker in town.
Hickman held the girl ransom, demanding $1,500 from her father — back then about a year’s salary. Supremely confident that he would elude capture, Hickman signed his name on the ransom notes, “The Fox.”
After two days, Marion’s father agreed to hand over the ransom in exchange for the safety of his daughter. What Perry Parker didn’t know is that Hickman never intended to live up to his end of the bargain.
The Pittsburgh Press detailed what Hickman, in his own words, did next.
“It was while I was fixing the blindfold that the urge to murder came upon me,” he said. “I just couldn’t help myself. I got a towel and stepped up behind Marion. Then, before she could move, I put it around her neck and twisted it tightly.”
Hickman didn’t hold back on any of these details: like Rand, he was proud of his cold-bloodedness.
“I held on and she made no outcry except to gurgle. I held on for about two minutes, I guess, and then I let go. When I cut loose the fastenings, she fell to the floor. I knew she was dead.”
“After she was dead I carried her body into the bathroom and undressed her, all but the underwear, and cut a hole in her throat with a pocket knife to let the blood out.”
Hickman then dismembered the child piece-by-piece, putting her limbs in a cabinet in his apartment, and then wrapped up the carved-up torso, powdered the lifeless face of Marion Parker, set what was left of her stump torso with the head sitting atop it in the passenger seat of his car, and drove to meet her father to collect the ransom money.
He even sewed open her eyelids to make it look like she was alive.
On the way, Hickman dumped body parts out of his car window, before rendezvousing with Marion Parker’s father.
Armed with a shotgun so her father wouldn’t come close enough to Hickman’s car to see that Marion was dead, Hickman collected his $1,500, then kicked open the door and tossed the rest of Marion Parker onto the road. As he sped off, her father fell to his knees, screaming.
Days later, the police caught up with a defiant and unrepentant Hickman in Oregon. His lawyers pleaded insanity, but the jury gave him the gallows.
To nearly everyone, Hickman was a monster. The year of the murder, the Los Angeles Times called it “the most horrible crime of the 1920s.” Hickman was America’s most despicable villain at the time.
But to Alissa Zinovievna Rosenbaum, a 21-year-old Russian political science student who’d arrived in America just two years earlier, Hickman was a hero.
Alissa was a squat five-foot-two with a flapper hairdo and wide, sunken dark eyes that gave her a haunting stare. Etched into those brooding eyes was burned the memory of a childhood backlit by the Russian Revolution.
She had just departed Leninist Russia where, almost a decade earlier, there was a harsh backlash against the Russian property owners by the Bolsheviks. Alissa’s own family was targeted, and at the age of 12 she watched as Bolshevik soldiers burst into her father’s pharmacy, looted the store, and plastered on her dad’s doors the red emblem of the state, indicating that his private business now belonged to “the people.”
That incident left such a deep and burning wound in young Alissa’s mind that she went to college to study political science and vowed one day she’d become a famous writer to warn the world of the dangers of Bolshevism.
Starting afresh in Hollywood, she anglicized her name to Ayn Rand, and moved from prop-girl to screenwriter/novelist, basing the heroes of several of her stories on a man she was reading about in the newspapers at the time. A man she wrote effusively about in her diaries. A man she hero-worshipped.
William Edward Hickman was the most notorious man in American in 1928, having achieved the level of national fame that she craved.
Young Ayn Rand saw in Hickman the “ideal man” she based The Fountainhead on, and used to ground her philosophy and her life’s work. His greatest quality, she believed, was his unfeeling, pitiless selfishness.
Hickman’s words were carefully recounted by Rand in her Journals. His statement that, “I am like the state: what is good for me is right,” resonated deeply with her. It was the perfect articulation of her belief that if people pursued their own interests above all else — even above friends, family, or nation — the result would be utopian.
She wrote in her diary that those words of Hickman’s were, “the best and strongest expression of a real man’s psychology I ever heard.”
Hickman — the monster who boasted about how he had hacked up a 12-year-old girl — had Rand’s ear, as well as her heart. She saw a strongman archetype in him, the way that people wearing red MAGA hats see strongman saviors in Donald Trump and Elon Musk.
As Hickman’s murder trial unfolded, Rand grew increasingly enraged at how the “mediocre” American masses had rushed to condemn her Superman.
“The first thing that impresses me about the case,” Rand wrote in reference to the Hickman trial in early notes for a book she was working on titled The Little Street, “is the ferocious rage of the whole society against one man.”
Astounded that Americans didn’t recognize the heroism Hickman showed when he proudly rose above simply conforming to society’s rules, Rand wrote:
“It is not the crime alone that has raised the fury of public hatred. It is the case of a daring challenge to society. … It is the amazing picture of a man with no regard whatever for all that society holds sacred, with a consciousness all his own.”
Rand explained that when the masses are confronted with such a bold actor, they neither understood nor empathized with him.
Thus, “a brilliant, unusual, exceptional boy [was] turned [by the media] into a purposeless monster.”
The protagonist of the book that Rand was writing around that time was a boy named Danny Renahan. In her notes for the book, she wrote, “The model for the boy [Renahan] is Hickman.” He would be her ideal man, and the archetype for a philosophical movement that would transform a nation.
“He is born with the spirit of Argon and the nature of a medieval feudal lord,” Rand wrote in her notes describing Renahan. “Imperious. Impatient. Uncompromising. Untamable. Intolerant. Unadaptable. Passionate. Intensely proud. Superior to the mob… an extreme ‘extremist.’ … No respect for anything or anyone.”
Rand wanted capitalism in its most raw form, uncheck by any government that could control the rules of the market or promote the benefits of society. Such good intentions had, after all, caused the hell she’d experienced in the Bolshevik Revolution.
Ayn Rand, like Hickman, found peace and justification in the extremes of her economic, political, and moral philosophy. Forget about democratic institutions, forget about regulating markets, and forget about pursuing any policies that benefit the majority at the expense of the very rich — the petty political rule-makers and rule-enforcers could never, ever do anything well or good.
Nobody knows for sure what causes a lack of empathy — or even a disdain for empathy — in people like Hickman, Rand, and across today’s GOP. There’s been a debate for decades in the psychological community about whether it’s nature or nurture, its association with some aspects of the autism spectrum, or if it’s even a “war winning” gene we inherited from our chimp ancestors that helped us destroy the Neanderthals and conquer the planet.
Rand, like Trump, lived a largely joyless life. She mercilessly manipulated people, particularly her husband and Alan Greenspan (who brought a dollar-sign-shaped floral arrangement to her funeral), and, like Trump, surrounded herself with cult-like followers who were only on the inside so long as they gave her total, unhesitating loyalty.
Like Trump, Musk, Johnson and their billionaire backers, Rand believed that a government working to help out working-class “looters,” instead of solely looking out for rich capitalist “producers,” was throwing its “best people” under the bus.
In Rand’s universe, the producers had no obligations to the looters. Providing welfare or sacrificing one nickel of your own money to help a “looter” on welfare, unemployment, or Social Security — particularly if it was “taken at the barrel of a gun” (taxes) — was morally reprehensible.
Like Trump saying, “My whole life I’ve been greedy,” for Rand looking out for numero uno was the singular name of the game — selfishness was next to godliness.
Rand’s philosophy, though popular in high school and on college campuses, never did — in her lifetime — achieve the sort of mass appeal she had hoped. But today Ayn Rand’s philosophy is a central tenet of the Libertarian and Republican Parties and grounds the moral code proudly cited and followed by high-profile billionaires and three former Republican presidents of the United States.
Ironically, when she was finally beginning to be taken seriously, Ayn Rand became ill with lung cancer and went on Social Security and Medicare to make it through her last days. She died a “looter” in 1982, unaware that her promotion of William Edward Hickman’s psychopathic worldview would one day validate an entire political party’s embrace of a similarly damaged president.
The result so far is over a half-million Americans who unnecessarily died from Covid, an epidemic of homelessness, and the ongoing collapse of the governmental institutions undergirding this nation’s social safety net.
While the ideas and policies promoted by the libertarians who control the Republican Party have made CEOs and billionaire investors very, very rich in recent decades, it’s killing the rest of us.
Maybe it’s time we stop looking to billionaires and strongmen for salvation — and start learning from the mammals who still know how to care for their own. Because if mice can show more humanity than our political and corporate overlords, what’s our excuse?
NOW READ: Trump's interior life is a clown car of neurotic conflicts —so we must all suffer
The Arizona State Legislature is considering a bill that would further subsidize the 27-year-old Chase Field, which taxpayers provided more than $250 million to help build in 1998, in order to support the Arizona Diamondbacks. But why should taxpayers be asked to foot the bill once again for a venue that is public in name only?
Forbes estimates the Diamondbacks to be worth $1.6 billion — after being purchased for only $238 million in 2004 — and co-owner Ken Kendrick supposedly has a net worth of more than $1 billion. Now, the team wants $500 million from taxpayers to renovate the aging stadium.
The idea that the stadium is a “public asset” that deserves taxpayer dollars is ludicrous. The stadium supports a private business, which largely caters to a wealthy class of patrons. There is no economic justification for subsidizing the profits of a billionaire owner and his upper-crust clientele.
This is a wealth transfer from general taxpayers, many of whom can’t afford to go to a game, to the most well-to-do members of the community. Democrats and Republicans should be joining hands in opposition to this indefensible subsidy rather than making bipartisan toasts over cocktails in the owner’s suite.
Five decades of economic studies have yet to identify a stadium that justifies subsidization.
Researchers have found that stadiums are simply not economic-development catalysts, because they largely just reallocate how local residents spend their money. If citizens weren’t spending it at the ballpark, they would be spending it at other local businesses.
Estimates of non-fiscal social benefits also show that community members tend to place a low value on having a local sports team. Nothing comes close to the hundreds of millions of dollars that the bill’s advocates are seeking. This research evidence is robust, with theoretical and empirical support, which is why it is the consensus view among scholars that stadiums are inadvisable public investments.
The public doesn’t like stadiums, either. A 2022 poll from researchers at Arizona State University found that the public is largely opposed to venue subsidies, with 56% opposing taxes to subsidize professional sports venues, and only 26% supporting higher taxes for this purpose.
If legislators really think a renovated ballpark is something that the public values, then the proposal should be put directly to voters at the ballot box. The reason it is being pushed through the Legislature is because its chief advocates know that the public does not support it.
And if they go forward with the plan, they should be aware that there will likely be electoral consequences. See former Wisconsin state Sen. George Petak and the late Cobb County Commissioner Tim Lee in Georgia, who both ended their political careers after supporting unpopular ballpark subsidies for the Milwaukee Brewers and Atlanta Braves, respectively.
The funding mechanism being proposed to benefit the Diamondbacks relies upon what public finance economists call “fiscal illusion.” The tax mechanism was selected to understate the public cost. By drawing funds from the district around the stadium, it gives the appearance of a use tax, being paid for only by customers.
This is not correct. What it is doing is taking tax dollars that are scheduled to be allocated to other public purposes and instead redirecting them to underwrite this special-interest project. Even though the hundreds-of-millions of dollars figures being discussed would be collected from the geographic area, the revenue has the opportunity cost of funding other public projects or simply cutting taxes to put the money back in taxpayers’ pockets.
If the government is devoting public dollars to a stadium project, then the public must be out that same amount of money. You cannot pull this money out of thin air; otherwise, we would fund all public projects like this. It’s important to remember: THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A FREE STADIUM.
I urge the Arizona Legislature to give thoughtful consideration to this policy issue.
Floridians are big mad.
Not all 20-odd million of us, of course: We tend to be politically soporific, occasionally becoming passionate over potholes or maybe a too-short grouper fishing season, but preferring to keep reality at arm’s length.
Still, something is changing. People are angry, auto-calling their representatives, making signs, demonstrating and showing up at town halls.
MAGAs will tell you these are nothing but a bunch of disgruntled Democrats, but I’ll bet cash money a good number of those veterans protesting silently outside Tallahassee City Hall last week usually vote Republican.
And I’ll bet a decent number, frightened and frustrated over President Musk’s scorched-earth attacks on the Department of Education, NOAA, USAID, etc. (it’s a terrifyingly long list), didn’t vote at all in 2024.
I overheard a couple of them talking about it during a recent town hall in Tallahassee. They both said they didn’t like either candidate: Harris was too pro-Israel, Trump was good at business (highly debatable) but a terrible person, and until now they never really thought it mattered who got elected.
Now they know.
The town hall was organized by the Democratic Party of Leon County, hoping to get our congressman to come and talk to us, his constituents.
Rep. Neal Dunn was invited. He never even responded. He certainly didn’t show up.
Republicans don’t show up, not any more.
They don’t like getting booed. They don’t like facing outraged citizens.
A few tried holding town halls. Did not go well. But hey, at least they actually held town halls. Nobody’s seen hide nor hair of Florida Republicans.
Maybe they’re huddled together in an undisclosed location.
I doubt anyone expected to see either of our senators: Ashley Moody remains a MAGA acolyte, while Rick Scott held a telephone town hall once, but that was back during the pandemic.
Lawmaker invisibility hasn’t stopped constituents from arranging meetings and imploring these politicians — who allegedly work for them — to come and listen.
Tampa Bay voters put on a town hall in Clearwater on March 15 in Rep. Anna Paulina Luna’s district.
She was, unsurprisingly, absent. Undeterred, a large crowd addressed a cut-out of her.
Some told the cardboard Luna they feared DOGE would wreck Social Security.
One lady, whose husband was fired from the U.S. Geological Survey in DOGE’s senseless purges, said, “I’ve called and I have emailed and heard nothing from you.”
Maybe Luna’s too busy lobbying to carve Trump’s face on Mt. Rushmore.
Luna doesn’t support Ukraine, and pitched a little hissy fit when Democrats waved the blue and yellow flag in the House, snapping, “Put those damn flags away!”
But by God, she’s determined to get to the bottom of the great JFK assassination cover-up, demanding the doctors who treated JFK in Dallas and members of the Warren Commission who investigated it appear before Congress.
Unfortunately for her and for the CIA/Cuba/KGB/Space Aliens conspiracy theorists, all those people are quite dead.
Neal Dunn, last week’s no-show, is a urologist from Panama City and is, like Luna, one of the state’s least impressive members of Congress.
He’s done absolutely nothing of note, unless you count his proposed resolution to “Protect American Businesses from Onerous Refrigeration Regulations.”
You’d think he might have bothered to attend a room of 500+ voters, eager to hear from him.
It wouldn’t have been much of an inconvenience, either: According to his website, he was in Tallahassee that morning, hosting an event for young people who might want to attend one of the service academies.
That event ended at 11 a.m.; the town hall started at 11 a.m.; the distance from City Hall to the American Legion Hall is 1.8 miles.
It would have taken him a solid five or six minutes to drive there.
The standing-room-only audience created a list of what they’d like to talk about: the unelected Musk, DOGE’s trashing of government services, Ukraine, health care, reproductive rights, our endangered planet, our endangered entitlement programs, and our endangered democracy.
A panel of worthies, including a county commissioner, a city commissioner, legendary activist Karen Woodall, and former Democratic congressman Alan Boyd, tried to address people’s issues.
It wasn’t smooth sailing.
Many were thoroughly annoyed with the good souls on the panel as well as the minority party in Washington.
Democrats are good at lamenting, hand-wringing, and doom-predicting — all reasonable responses to the atrocities visited upon the country by President Musk and his henchpersons.
They just don’t seem to have much in the way of answers.
One guy stood up and yelled, “What’s the solution? I think we know the problem!”
Sentient Americans understand the United States is being dismantled, hurled into a Dumpster, and set on fire.
Rep. Dunn’s district contains six institutions of higher education. All receive federal funds.
If DOGE gets its way and slashes the budgets of the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health, what will become of research at FSU, FAMU, and other colleges and universities?
FSU alone could lose $65 million.
That would be a direct hit on the College of Medicine, all the science departments, and the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory — the largest and most important magnet lab in the world.
It conducts experiments in (among other things) superconductivity, critical to efficient and sustainable energy sources.
If that money goes away, it won’t just be scientific research that suffers: There will be a knock-on effect, harming the whole university.
The best professors will leave; the best students won’t enroll; lots of people will be laid off.
What will happen to the hundreds of federal jobs at Tyndall Air Force Base at the western end of Rep. Dunn’s territory? How about the USDA Farm Service office in Madison at the eastern end?
Florida is home to 100,000 federal employees, most of them represented by Republicans.
How about DOGE’s decimating NOAA and the National Weather Service? Florida’s entire Democratic congressional delegation warned that this was a Very Bad Idea.
No Republicans signed onto their letter.
Maybe Dunn thinks Florida doesn’t need hurricane forecasters; maybe he’s forgotten what Hurricane Michael did to his district in 2018.
Without NWS it would have been even worse.
What would Dunn — or any of Florida’s senators and representatives— say to the 400 statewide who’ve lost their jobs with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Or the untold numbers who’ll soon be sacked by the Veterans Administration?
Dunn is a veteran himself, but he’s pretty offhand about their concerns. It’s only 20 “in the region” (whatever than means — VA jobs, maybe?
“This is not a massacre,” he said.
Maybe not to him, but the veterans protesting outside his recent event at Gulf Coast State College weren’t impressed: “There’s nowhere in the Constitution that what is going on with DOGE and Elon Musk is appropriate,” one told WJHG TV.
That’s putting it mildly.
But the Constitution doesn’t seem to matter to DOGE, President Musk, Trump, or the Republican-controlled Congress.
Maybe it will mean something to the Supreme Court.
What do you say, Rep. Dunn?
— DOGE plans to re-program Social Security. Social Security runs on an older COBAL programming language and, while it’s a bit creaky, it works just fine. But the DOGE wrecking crew — we learned the day after Musk went on Fox “News” and lied repeatedly to America’s seniors — now plans to replace the entire system with something newer.
This is the kind of project, messing with 70 million people’s earned benefits, that should take a year or two with multiple layers of redundancy and safety; instead they say they’ll do it in a few months. What could possibly go wrong? A lot, as WIRED reports a senior Social Security technologist told them: “Of course one of the big risks is not underpayment or overpayment per se but [it’s also] not paying someone at all and not knowing about it. The invisible errors and omissions.” The big concern is that they might end up crashing the entire system.
Again, from WIRED’s interview: “This is an environment that is held together with bail wire and duct tape. The leaders need to understand that they’re dealing with a house of cards or Jenga. If they start pulling pieces out, which they’ve already stated they’re doing, things can break.”
Which raises another question; why are these guys who are supposed to be looking for “fraud and waste” reprogramming this system? Is it to make it harder for people to get their benefits so seniors will sign off on a “Social Security Advantage” privatized program the way they have with the privatized Medicare Advantage? Is it so they can build back doors into it? What’s the game here? Why the hurry? Something stinks…
— Are Trump and Putin carving up the planet? Somehow, American media missed the story that Putin, visiting an arctic submarine base this week, proclaimed, “Not long ago I said we’d grind them [Ukraine] down — now it looks like we’ll finish them off.” Trump, meanwhile, is making more absurd demands of Ukraine including that they give up half of their gas, oil, and minerals in exchange for…nothing. No security guarantee at all. Just give it to us and trust us. Right…
Also this week a Russian researcher who’d criticized the war in Ukraine and thus found asylum in the US working at Harvard University was stopped by Customs and Border Protection flying home from a conference in Paris and her phone was grabbed; now she’s in that notorious private prison that ICE uses in Louisiana, where all the anti-Netanyahu student protestors are currently illegally incarcerated, and Trump is threatening to send her back to Russia where she’ll probably spend the rest of her life in a gulag. On top of that, Trump this week repeated twice his threat to seize Greenland. (The Vance advance team went door-to-door in Greenland trying to find even one family that would invite the VP and his wife in for tea and cookies and couldn’t get a single taker.)
And the prime minister of Canada just formally broke relations with the United States, ending an alliance that goes back more than two centuries. Trump is destroying our alliances, threatening our neighbors and allies, and generally doing everything Putin would want him to do to wreck our reputation around the world. Any guesses as to why? Leave your comments below…
— Trump’s message to America: Scam the people, get a pardon. In 2022, Trevor Milton was convicted of a massive fraud involving the phony hydrogen-powered-truck-company Nicola, having scammed investors out of over $600 million. Trump just pardoned him, and the entire auto industry is boggled. Why would he issue such a pardon? Nobody knows, but many are betting Milton has greased Trump’s palms or those of somebody in his family. After all, now that he has a pardon Milton is not required to pay back any of the money. Inquiring minds want to know what’s going on here…
— The resistance in America is alive and doing well: stay engaged! Over 1400 academics have called for a boycott of Columbia University for their free speech crackdown in deference to Trump’s demands. At the same time, researchers have discovered that America is currently experience a nearly unprecedented wave of protest against the naked corruption and fascism of the Trump administration. Today, protests at Tesla dealerships are planned around the world, and next Saturday (April 5) will see protests in virtually every town and city in America. Will Trump try to use violence to crack down on dissent like his role models Putin and Orbán routinely do? Stay tuned…
— Bribe the president, get an exemption from pollution rules? The Trump EPA has just put out a new email address to fossil fuel companies where they can make their case privately to Trump himself, asking for relief from pollution rules. This is the guy who offered to entirely deregulate the industry if they’d give him a billion dollars; it appears this is the same scam only on a more incremental basis. Once a scammer, always a scammer…
— Georgia police jailed another woman for having a miscarriage. One in four pregnancies ends in miscarriage, so it wasn’t a rare occurrence when a 24-year-old Georgia woman lost her fetus at 19 weeks and disposed of the remains in a dumpster behind her apartment building (there are no laws mandating any other form of disposal). A neighbor called police, however, and now she’s in jail facing 13 years in prison for “concealing the death of another person” and “abandonment of a dead body.” It wasn’t a “person” or a “body,” of course; it was a fetus. But that doesn’t appear to matter to the male supremacist men who run Georgia. This is just the latest in a long string of incidents where women have been criminalized for having miscarriages, a practice that’s gone on steroids since six Republicans on the Supreme Court allowed states to criminalize abortion. Even though this and multiple other miscarriages had nothing to do with abortion or abortion drugs, they’re still running full octane on their war on women.
— Scientists are alarmed as the Trump administration goes to war against mRNA science. Seriously folks? One of the great scientific breakthroughs in the past few decades has been the development of mRNA technology; vaccines are currently in development for a wide variety of serious diseases as well as a vaccine that could prevent or even cure cancer. None of that matters, though, in Bob Kennedy’s weird anti-vax world as public health experts freak out over the NIH preparing to pull millions in funding from ongoing mRNA research. These people appear not to care how many Americans die…
— Crazy Alert! Tucker Carlson Says He Doesn’t Want to Fly on a Plane with a Vaccinated Pilot: “It’s Too Dangerous.” For the record, while there have been a few cases of inflammation of the heart (myocarditis) associated with the Covid vaccines, the risk of getting that condition is massively higher with a simple Covid infection itself. Nonetheless, science genius Tucker Carlson is worried about flying on a plane with an unvaccinated pilot. Tinfoil hats, anybody?
NOW READ: How the Republican war on empathy turned America into a playground for sociopaths
Despite all my moaning since a slim majority of Americans decided it was safer to carry on with their lives walking a tightrope without any safety nets, than it was to stay grounded, and together against the billionaires who have proved over and over again they want to eat us all, I have been mighty proud of the good and righteous people on the Left.
Too many Americans don’t deserve us, but the idea of America does, dammit. Despite being knocked down and staying down on that gray November day, we picked ourselves up and braved the fascist winds that are blowing at a gale off the Potomac right now.
This was no easy thing.
Watching our country double-down on a repulsive madman, and a party that provably means us harm was like a knife to the heart. Even today, it defies anything rational or decent.
We have hit town halls, and rallied in the freezing cold at our Capitals. We have canvassed, made phone calls and written our congresspeople. We are showing up everywhere to fight against the same terrible things better people than us did while sacrificing their lives on the battlefield.
You know, in the painful hours that followed the most consequential election in our nation’s history November 5th, I typed a piece through defiance and tears that ended up getting a lot of read: DO NOT SUBMIT.
I remember it being about the easiest thing I have ever written, because if you are reading this you almost certainly know that the only way to beat evil is to never give into it.
Except that is exactly what too many institutions, including the Democratic Party, have been doing. And while the party is finally showing some signs of life, all thanks to us, these institutions are caving into the orange, American-attacking felon exactly like he does every time he’s in a room with Vladimir Putin.
It is just disgusting to watch, it really is.
On Thursday afternoon, the University of Michigan became the latest institution of “higher learning” to bow down to Trump, when they offered up a public sacrifice of their once proud, state-of-the-art Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) program because the grifter was threatening to pull OUR money from the university.
Up until Thursday, Michigan had been at the forefront of helping to lead America out of the darkness, into the light, and toward a better place where our children were "not judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character."
You won’t find a more noble or necessary cause.
In the story I linked to above in the Detroit Free Press, Rebekah Modrak, the chair of the faculty senate hit a home run with this beauty:
“The federal government is determined to dismantle and control higher education and to make our institutions more uniform, more inequitable, and more exclusive. They are using the power of the government to engineer a sweeping culture change towards white supremacy. Unfortunately, University of Michigan leaders seem determined to comply and to collaborate in our own destruction.”
Michigan’s surrender follows similar gross actions from scores of other places that should know better. Places like museums, libraries, and department stores, are all tearing up their DEI initiatives faster than Trump can devour three Big Macs.
Makes you wonder how important DEI really was at these places if they are now ready to turn on a dime a run like the dickens from ‘em.
Law firms are falling at Trump’s fat, little feet, because apparently it’s become just too damn expensive to stand on the right side of the law.
Even ABC-News disgraced itself when it settled with the American-attacker for $15 million in a defamation suit they win 999 out of 1000 times. This is one of the most pathetic things I have ever seen as journalist, and lately I’ve seen more than enough.
But really, just when in the hell is even one of these places going to say, “You know what, pal? Take your racist ass on out of here. We’ll get along just fine without you, or we’ll see you in court. Up to you, sport.”
In fact, the first place that says that will get a big, fat donation from me. And I’ll bet you I’m not alone.
It is brutal watching all this.
When in the hell are these places going to learn what you and I already know: Silver-spoon fed punks like the draft-dodging Trump see capitulation and submission as a weakness. Once you do it once, he’ll be harrumphing back again demanding more. It’s all about the humiliation with this insecure baby, who never did get over being dumped in some military boarding school, because his parents found him impossible to be around.
As for the diversity aspect of all this, it’s taken this complete mess of an administration but four months to prove that we have never needed it more in this country.
Take a look at the so-called cabinet that this orange bigot who sees “fine people” on both sides of a KKK rally has assembled. It is not only stuffed with more white males than any cabinet since — no surprise — Ronald Reagan’s, but has more clowns in it than the Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Pete Hegseth, Project 2025’s Russell Vought just to name a few ...
Then there are the three white women who have gleefully lowered themselves into that despicable cabinet headlined by a puppy-killer.
Consider the big news this week, when we found out a group of geniuses led by Hegseth, the stone-cold drunk who is somehow leading our Defense Department, came within inches of getting our best, brightest, and bravest killed when they treated the launch of a strategic airstrike in Yemen with all the secrecy and regard they’d give some fantasy football draft at a topless bar.
Great job there, fellas. The only reason you still have your damn jobs is precisely because you are white. So let’s save all this handwringing over the harm DEI initiatives are having on America, you incompetent nitwits. You are precisely the reason they were needed in the first place.
Any university that goes along with that and these guys, isn’t worth a dollar of tuition. Any university that is too stupid to see what is going on in America right now, and the parallels to what happened in Germany in the 1930s and ‘40s should just get out of the education business altogether.
Look, I have long been a supporter of our universities, even if I never attended one. I fancied these places as institutions of higher learning that educated our young people, and prepared them for life’s long, hard road ahead — and the odious sins of our past.
My only real gripe with ‘em has been their price tag. Who the hell can afford to send their kids to these places?
Actually, never mind, I know the answer …
D. Earl Stephens is the author of “Toxic Tales: A Caustic Collection of Donald J. Trump’s Very Important Letters” and finished up a 30-year career in journalism as the Managing Editor of Stars and Stripes. You can find all his work here, and follow him on Bluesky here.
In the past month, Trump has threatened to imprison peaceful protest organizers, falsely declared a national invasion, invoked war powers in time of peace, serially ignored court orders, and sent people to an El Salvador prison without due process or review, all while making outrageous comments meant to distract the public from his administration’s illegal conduct.
This week served up the capper when we learned that Trump officials are coordinating their actions on Signal, an app with an auto delete feature, in violation of multiple federal laws requiring communications to be preserved and protected.
All angles spell danger for the Republic
The Signal breach is appalling from all sides, each so dangerous it is hard to determine which angle is more threatening from a national security perspective:
That Secretary of Defense Hegseth sloppily jeopardized the lives of US service members, or his reflexive, dry drunk anger at being asked about it.
That Trump didn’t appear to know (or remember) anything about the scandal several hours after it broke on international news, or that he doesn’t understand why it matters.
That his spokes child tried (again) to discredit the media, or that she thinks “war plan” vs. “attack plan” is a meaningful semantic distinction when targets, weaponry, and attack sequencing are revealed to enemy eyes.
That the national security advisor went on Fox News to take ‘full responsibility’ for the Signal error, or that he then called the Atlantic editor ‘scum’ for reporting the story in the first place.
That Tulsi Gabbard, Director of National Intelligence, doesn’t know that US intelligence laws apply to all “national defense information,” not just “classified information,” or Trump’s irrelevant, false messaging that “no classified information” was included on the Signal exchange.
As the absurdity of this clown car of ignorance and arrogance unfolds, the most dangerous aspect of it has, at least so far, received the least media attention: Trump advisors are exchanging official communications on an app deliberately set to delete all evidence of their communications, which appears to be their standard operating procedure.
Trump’s team is breaking federal law by deleting evidence
Tulsi Gabbard, Trump’s Director of National Intelligence, testified this week at a Congressional hearing that the Signal app came “pre-installed on government devices,” suggesting its use was not limited to the Yemen fiasco. From the content of the group chat published this week by The Atlantic— only published because Trump officials kept lying about what was on it—Signal looks like the default method used by administration officials to communicate with one another. The Yemen group chat explicitly referred to another such chat, making clear that this was not their first.
Gabbard, in her testimony, did not mention Signal’s primary feature, which is a built-in option, activated by Trump officials, to automatically destroy its own contents on a pre-selected date. The Yemen screenshots show that, in coordinating their airstrikes, Trump officials set Signal to erase all messages coordinating them. Some were set to disappear after one week, and some were set to disappear after four weeks.
Deleting official communications is a federal crime, punishable by up to ten years in prison.
It is a crime to destroy any federal record
Legal mandates including the Espionage Act, the Presidential Records Act, and the Records Management by Federal Agencies Act require that ALL federal records created by the President, Vice President, cabinet agencies, and the intelligence community be preserved, protected, and produced for review by any court of jurisdiction that requires them.
Under the Espionage Act, 18 USC § 793, anyone who through gross negligence permits such information “to be removed from its proper place of custody” or allows it “to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed,” or fails to promptly report any such destruction to his superior officer “Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.” Because of the typo-free and specific attack details in his lengthy texts, Hegseth appears to have cut and pasted the attack plan from a secured source into the unsecure app, thereby endangering the lives of the servicemen involved.
Under 18 U.S.C. § 2071, anyone who conceals, removes, or mutilates records “shall be fined, imprisoned not more than three years, or both and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.” The disqualification is mandatory, not discretionary.
The worst takeaway from Signalgate is Trump’s attempts to block scrutiny
Even if sharing the Signal chat on Yemen was a mistake, as officials claim, choosing to set the date(s) on which all content would be destroyed could only be deliberate, a fact not lost on American Oversight. After the Signal breach was reported, American Oversight filed suit against Hegseth, Gabbard, Marco Rubio and other officials, seeking to enjoin the Trump administration from continuing to destroy evidence of their own conduct. As detailed in their complaint, Trump officials appear to be using Signal in other governance contexts as well, creating records that are deliberately destroyed in violation of the Federal Records Act and/or the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”).
The purpose of FOIA and federal records laws is transparency: to make sure we know what our government is doing, to protect American citizens from rogue and illegal government actions. Under the Constitution, this power belongs to the people.
Transparency in government is one of our oldest and most sacrosanct rights; it is what protects us from jackboots in the night. By running “off the books” official communications, Trump advisors are deliberately circumventing federal law to evade public and legal scrutiny, in line with Project 2025’s calls to conceal damning information from the public.
That Trump, his buffoonish cabinet, and the architects of Project 2025 would go to such lengths to hide what they are up to should keep every American up at night.
NOW READ: Maybe this is why they're lying
Sabrina Haake is a 25+ year federal trial attorney specializing in 1st and 14th A defense. Her columns are published in Alternet, Chicago Tribune, MSN, Out South Florida, Raw Story, Salon, Smart News and Windy City Times. Her Substack, The Haake Take, is free.
I grew up with a raving alcoholic.To call his behavior erratic is to engage in understatement for dramatic effect.
My dad was in the Navy, assigned to one of the submarines of the Pacific Fleet in Oahu Hawaii, which meant long periods of welcomed absence. But whenever the submarine was docked, he was home, where he vacillated between two states of drunk: wet drunk and dry.
If given a choice between the two, I’d have chosen wet.
Dry drunk behavior is universal
Our prized family possession, after a pink and brown conch shell from Oahu, was a wooden coocoo clock. Hand-carved to look like a bird house, it was dark stained, complete with gingerbread-trimmed gable roof and hanging metal pine cone weights (tree house. you get it.) The house was about two feet long, ten inches wide, and every hour, on the hour, little green shutters would draw back to let a beautiful blue bird pop out, chirping.
My dad hated that bird.
I could always gauge whether it was a wet drunk or dry drunk week by what he did at the top of the hour.If he merely yelled obscenities at the chirping bird, it was a wet drunk, Pabst-soaked day and the ugly exchange would end when the bird went back inside. But if my dad threw something at the bird, it was a dry drunk day, which meant the safest place to be was anywhere else.
I’ve learned since then that when he wasn’t actually drunk, my dad was what’s known as a ‘dry drunk.’ October Road, a publication about substance use, says that dry drunks, despite their sobriety, typically continue to behave in destructive ways if they “have not fully embraced recovery.” Dry drunk doesn’t necessarily imply relapse, but it suggests “a lack of personal growth and mental or emotional recovery.”
Pete Hegseth’s seething anger feels familiar
“Angry lack of personal growth” should be tattooed on Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s forehead. Following the Signal fiasco, when Hegseth got off the plane at the Pearl Harbor-Hickam base in Honolulu, (coincidentally where my dad was stationed), a reporter asked him about the Signal breach, specifically, how an editor from The Atlantic was added to a chat about attacking Houthis in Yemen.
Hegseth spewed outrage, as if concern for servicemembers whose lives he put at risk infringed his right to breathe. He jacked up and down on his heels, leered forward and scrunched his face, going in for the pre-emptive attack: “So you’re talking about a deceitful and highly discredited so-called journalist who (has) made a profession of pedaling hoaxes time and time again.” He looked away from the camera, indignant, looked back, flexed his shoulders like a boxer in the ring and said, “(The editor of The Atlantic) is a guy who peddles in garbage. This is what he does.”
After a few more insults, he segued into victimhood: “You see, we’ve been dealing with four years of deferred maintenance (from Biden).” He left unsaid that the attacks failed to achieve their only goal: deterring the terrorist group, which means Houthis are still launching near-daily missiles at Israel, and most shipping traffic is still being redirected.
Hegseth closed with an adamant declaration, disproved when the chat transcript was released, that, “NOBODY was texting war plans and that’s all I have to say.” With that, he turned and walked away from his personal version of my father’s hell: a flock of blue birds chirping with microphones.
Hegseth needs treatment, not command of the world’s most lethal force
To his credit, Hegseth has never denied being an alcoholic. It’s hard to see how he could, given the litany of colleagues who said they’d seen him drunk to the point of passing out.
Before he was confirmed, Hegseth was a talking head on Fox and Friends, where colleagues reported smelling alcohol on him before he went on air. Those same people said he did Fox’s version of “news” while he was hungover. They told NBC News that when they smelled alcohol on him in the studio, “Everyone would be talking about it behind the scenes before he went on air.”
Another report surfaced that during Hegseth’s service as president of Concerned Veterans for America (2013 to 2016), he was repeatedly intoxicated even while acting in his official capacity. Witnesses there said he frequently drank to the point of “needing to be carried out of the organization’s events.”
Dry drunks are angry, aggressive and dangerous
In one of his many reckless acts of revenge against America, Trump put Hegseth in charge of the world’s most lethal military force. During his confirmation, after proof of his alcoholism surfaced, Hegseth vowed to quit drinking if he was confirmed. His reflexive dry drunk anger over having to answer questions about Signalgate suggests, at least to me, that he’s keeping his vow.
But passing-out drunk is a serious problem, and, as any adult child of an alcoholic can tell you, the problem doesn’t go away just because you stop drinking. Emotional and psychological symptoms, including irritability, dishonesty, aggression, blaming others, mood swings and self-pity can remain for years--sometimes for life-- if the person does not fully engage in recovery. Already, these characteristics are on full display whenever Hegseth faces criticism; perhaps Trump’s narcissism manifests similarly.
Trump and his entire cabinet of clownishly unqualified people may be cosplaying in their roles, but wars are real. Combat fatality is real. Undisciplined ignorance at the highest level is dangerous.
Here’s hoping, for members of the US military, Americans, and all the singing bluebirds of the world, that Hegseth quickly gets some help.
Sabrina Haake is a 25+ year federal trial attorney specializing in 1st and 14th A defense.Her columns are published in Alternet, Chicago Tribune, MSN, Out South Florida, Raw Story, Salon, Smart News and Windy City Times. Her Substack, The Haake Take, is free.
Dear Republicans,
Here we go again. A large chunk of Trump‘s cabinet and our national security leaders just endangered our country and our pilots who were flying over Yemen with their arrogance and frank stupidity.
Their lies about it were so egregious that Jeffrey Goldberg published the actual transcript in The Atlantic this morning.
Only the best people, right?
After the corruption of the Coolidge and Hoover administrations crashed the world economy, kicking off the Republican Great Depression in 1929, it took your party decades to rid itself of the stink.
After Nixon committed treason to extend the Vietnam War to get himself re-elected, unnecessarily killing over 20,000 American soldiers and a million Vietnamese civilians, and then got busted for Watergate and the bribes he solicited in the White House, it took you almost a generation to rid yourselves of the stink.
But you’ll never rid yourself of the stink of Donald Trump, America’s first convicted felon and accused rapist president. At least never in the lifetime of anybody around today. Trump’s stench is a tragic part of American history that will last generations.
The entire world knows the fetor of his whipping up a crowd of thousands to try to assassinate the Vice President of the United States and the Speaker of the House because he lost an election.
Trump’s minions pissed on the carpets in the hallowed halls of Congress, smeared feces on the walls, damaged priceless paintings from the founding era of our country, and murdered three police officers protecting our nation’s Capitol. That stink will never fade, no matter how aggressively his allies try to rewrite history, blur faces, or tell their phony stories about bizarre “deep state” conspiracies.
Seriously, Republicans, did you think Americans would forget the stink of the 30,000+ documented lies he told America and the world while he was first president, and that he’s started up with again? Or the lies he routinely spouts every time he speaks in public, so frequent now that even Fox “News” has to correct the facts when covering him?
Or his stealing classified documents and then leaving them in public places with an industrial-sized copy machine as he invited known spies into Mar-a-Lardo? Or his fake electors’ scheme to overturn a fair election?
How about the reek of his dictator-like destruction of the American Civil Service, filling our government with corrupt toadies, and proclaiming his intention to imprison his political enemies and send the US military into the streets like Lukashenko has done in Belarus and tinpot dictators do all across the world?
Speaking of the behavior of tinpot dictators, Trump has now arrested a bunch of Hispanic-looking men and claims that they are Venezuelan gang members, sending them off to one of the world’s most brutal prisons for indefinite years of torture. He never bothered, however, with any sort of legal process to actually prove they’re not just people who came here looking for a better life for themselves and their children.
He’s signed over 100 laws, rules, and EOs gutting our environmental regulations and is actively promoting the fossil fuel industry, which funds the GOP with billions while it’s destroying the lives of our children and grandchildren. He pulled us out of the Paris Agreement, has packed the EPA and Department of the Interior with fossil fuel lobbyists and toadies, and killed off a government program to build EV charging stations.
Do you really believe that we would forget the stink of his sucking up to murderous dictators like Putin, MBS, and Kim? Now that effluvium is being smeared all over Republican politicians, one after another, as they follow Trump’s orders — which he no doubt received from Putin — to abandon Ukraine, shut down the Voice of America and Radio Liberty, and to sabotage NATO.
You are cowards, all. Covered in your wretched, cowardly, unpatriotic stink.
This is the man who tried to blackmail a democratic ally into manufacturing dirt on his political opponent, withholding aid to Ukraine in the face of Russian attacks. The stink of that crime was so heinous he was impeached for it.
His Muslim ban wasn’t just racist; it destroyed lives, separated families, and alienated allies. His refusal to condemn neo-Nazis in Charlottesville (“very fine people on both sides”) marked the first time in modern history a U.S. president openly pandered to white supremacists.
What about the stink Trump created when he referred to mostly-Black nations as “shithole countries” and our veterans who’d died in war as “suckers” and “losers”? When he told General Mark Milley he didn’t want to again share the stage with an injured veteran because such heroes “don’t look good”?
Or when, at the height of the pandemic in April 2020, Trump ordered people back to work and began to ridicule wearing masks, leading to hundreds of thousands of unnecessary deaths (according to his own science advisors: the British journal Lancet put the number at around a half-million)?
At that time, most Covid deaths were in Blue states (CT, NY, WA, NJ) and Trump agreed with Jared that they could politically benefit by blaming the deaths on Democratic governors. An “effective political strategy” they called this decision redolent with the stink of mass death.
That same son-in-law, by the way, who Trump helped hustle $2 billion from the Saudis in exchange, apparently, for downplaying the murder of a Washington Post journalist and looking the other way at how they oppress women. Do you think we failed to notice the reek of nepotism and corruption?
Speaking of women, do you really believe that the stink of your support for a man credibly accused of rape and sexual assault by over 20 women, including one as young as 13, would just go away? Particularly after he was found by a court of law to have raped “as the term is commonly understood” the first woman whose case finally made it through the courts?
As average working Americans struggle to pay their taxes, Trump pushed through an odious $4 trillion tax cut for himself and his billionaire buddies, creating the largest budget deficit by any president in the history of the nation. And now he’s planning to repeat that debacle, adding another $4.5 trillion to our nation’s debt while massively enriching himself and his fellow billionaires.
Do you think Americans — who, unlike Trump and his billionaire buddies actually pay their damn taxes — will forget?
Or the stink of his multiple business frauds? He was convicted and forced to pay millions in restitution to victims of his Trump University fraud; they shut down his phony New York charity; he was found by a New York court to have committed bank, tax, and insurance fraud.
How about the overwhelming stench of tearing babies from their mothers’ arms at the border and then trafficking them into phony “Christian adoption” services that then vanished, leaving over 1000 grieving families still not knowing the whereabouts of their little girls and boys to this day?
Or supporting Putin’s kidnapping over 100,000 Ukrainian children to sell into the thriving Russian child sex industry (the only large country where possession of child porn is legal) by shutting down the group documenting Putin’s child crimes?
Or the stink from the naked campaign lies he blithely told to get votes, promising a new national healthcare system, a revitalization of America’s infrastructure, or his claims that he supported organized labor at the same time his appointees to the Department of Labor are now working to block unionization efforts across the nation?
Even worse, this adulterer — who had affairs outside his marriage with every one of his three wives and never goes to church but still claims to be a Christian — told sincerely religious people he was their champion. Not noticing the sulfurous smell that surrounds Trump, many believed him and still do. In actual fact, he was only championing the hypocritical multimillionaire TV preachers who shared their hustle with him: he supported their violations of tax law in exchange for their endorsement from the pulpit.
Then he tried to overthrow an election he knew he lost by 7 million votes, and has now pardoned the violent criminals who helped him out. The whole world is aghast at the stink of that tinpot dictator effort, and terrified that he may succeed the next time he decides to get his goons and militia buddies to attack America.
How about his destruction of American soft power around the world by dismantling USAID? Or his ongoing destruction of the Social Security administration and the US Postal Service? His attacks on judges and law firms that are essential to a functioning democracy?
Germans still struggle with the stink of a leader who referred to his political opponents as “vermin” and promised he was going to “root them out.” Who attacked the press because they told the truth about him. Who played on and amplified people’s fear of “the other.” You will, too, for generations after Trump himself has shuffled off this mortal coil.
Pathetically, you Republican members of Congress have now smeared yourselves with the slime that has surrounded Donald Trump his entire criminal life. Have you noticed how many of your colleagues are avoiding town halls or trying to sit this presidency out in silence? Do you really think you can ever wash off yourself the reek of your association with treason, an attempt to betray and overthrow America, even worse than what Benedict Arnold tried?
Seriously, Republicans, do you think America can’t smell what’s going on? Trump bragging that he ended women’s rights to bodily autonomy with his Supreme Court picks? His promotion of guns and assault weapons because the racist nutcases who follow him think they’re going to be soldiers in a upcoming civil war? His refusal to do anything about the climate change that is now killing Americans every day?
And now he’s empowered a fanatic South African nepo-baby to take a chainsaw to our government, delighting Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, firing veterans left-and-right while gutting the Veterans Administration, Social Security, and Medicare/Medicaid.
Do you really think Americans — particularly women and minorities — will forget how he’s stripping memorials and histories of pioneering Black and female heroes from government sites and history books? How he reversed LBJ’s 1965 Executive Order, making it again legal for defense contractors to engage in racial and gender discrimination in hiring? Or how he and his Republicans in Congress are right now trying to make it hard for married women to vote in the next two elections?
America has had a few truly awful presidents. Andrew Jackson “The Indian Killer.” Andrew Johnson who tried to undo Lincoln’s legacy. Warren Harding and Teapot Dome. Richard Nixon’s criminality, Ronald Reagan’s commitment to destroy America’s middle class, George W. Bush lying us into two wars as part of his 2004 re-election strategy.
But none stink as bad as this miserable caricature of a man, with his bizarre orange spray-tan, absurd comb-over, and compensatory phallic-length red ties. Or the retinue of sycophants and billionaires who pathetically suck up to him.
America is not going to forget, and many Americans will never forgive.
You will never wash the stink of Donald Trump off yourselves or your party. Never.
Copyright © 2025 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 |
Masthead
|
Privacy Policy
|
Manage Preferences
|
Debug Logs
For corrections contact
corrections@rawstory.com
, for support contact
support@rawstory.com
.