Opinion
America is a smoldering pile of rubble this July 4 — and this absurd law is to blame
Hooray, we're free! Screw you, England!
Now what?
When Benjamin Franklin emerged from the Constitutional Convention and said we'd been given "a republic, if you can keep it," is there any doubt he was talking about 2026 America?
Taking stock of where we are—on our nation's 250th birthday—we're not exactly knocking it out of the park.
The Supreme Court appears well on its way to anointing the first American king: a man who has seemingly escaped accountability for everything under the sun, including fomenting an insurrection, then pardoning many of those involved. Meanwhile, Congress appears to have thrown in the towel years ago.
Our FBI is run by a frat bro. Our Justice Department seems hell-bent on prosecuting anyone who creates an offensive array of sea shells, while overseeing what looks to be one of the most blatant cover-ups of a sexual predator in modern history.
Legions of poorly trained "Brute Squads" roam our streets, disappearing people on their way to work, asking for proof of citizenship, even killing American citizens in broad daylight, with zero consequences.
Business-wise, we've helped create the world's first trillionaire. Surprise—it happens to be the same guy who recently oversaw the dismantling of foreign aid programs that fed some of the world's poorest children.
Our tech oligarchs have gone into full capitulation mode, cozying up to power, settling frivolous lawsuits, and swallowing media companies whole, decimating decades of journalistic independence and public trust in the process.
Meanwhile, millions of Americans are on the verge of losing healthcare coverage and Social Security benefits. Thanks to our kowtowing Congress allowing a president to start a war for no discernible reason beyond placating his fragile ego, oil companies are once again enjoying record profits.
Not to mention, cage fighting on the lawn of the White House, crypto grabs, billion-dollar ballrooms, abandoning clean energy, throwing protected lands open to drilling, election tampering, gutting cancer research, and a Health Secretary calling for an end to vaccines.
Oh—and the small matter of judges handing out near-life sentences for exercising the right to protest your government.
It's as though we've opened the Ghostbusters containment tank and the demons are running wild through Times Square, while the people who should be stopping them have decided it's easier—and infinitely more profitable—to switch sides. Along with the Zuckerbergs and Bezoses of the world, they've concluded that courage is expensive. Character even more so. Both are in desperately short supply in 2026 America.
Especially in an America where our highest court can acknowledge that a president committed sexual abuse with one breath, then proceed to hand the guy even more power with the next.
The situation has become so beyond absurd, even the country we fought a revolution to escape is openly wondering why Americans suddenly seem so eager to crown a king. A king who just boasted about making more than $2 billion during his first year back in office. A king who demonstrates daily that the word "honor" may as well be a four-letter one.
Given all this, would it really have been so terrible to just pay the damn tea tax and move on?
I mean... could it honestly have turned out any worse?
We're the teenagers entrusted to watch the house while their parents are away, only for them to return home to a smoldering pile of rubble.
One of the many reasons we find ourselves in this predicament: The Electoral College.
This anti-democratic relic was created to give states with smaller populations an equal say, but instead, allows the few to govern the many.
Until this archaic, obsolete law is vanquished, digging ourselves out of this hole will remain nearly impossible. As long as we continue to give states that routinely rank near the bottom in every meaningful category, i.e., education, healthcare, economic opportunity, the ability to decide the future of our entire nation, we're going to keep reliving this Orwellian nightmare for generations to come.
Having said all that, before you climb the tallest building and start screaming, "THIS GUY HATES AMERICA!!"
Consider how tragic it is that we've reached a point where standing up for the rule of law, the Constitution, and basic accountability requires the ones doing it to have to repeatedly reassure those listening that they love their country.
For what it's worth, I do.
I loved America before the Mad King took the reins. I loved it when the Supreme Court effectively decided a presidential election over a hanging chad. I loved it when a president lied about an affair with an intern. I loved it when a president’s entire Cabinet lied about weapons of mass destruction. And I loved it when a president wore a tan suit.
Call me crazy, but I love the America that practices what it preaches. Or, at least, used to preach.
The one that welcomes people with open arms. The one that believes everyone deserves the opportunity to pursue happiness. The one that believes helping those less fortunate is more important, and much more rewarding, than adding another zero to your bank account. The one that values compassion. Ethics. Tolerance. Decency. And Character and Accountability over Hate and Lies and Bigotry and Misogyny.
However, as dim as the future looks, we’re not done yet. In a few short months, it'll once again be up to us to decide whether we want to continue living under the hand of an unhinged wannabe autocrat who can barely spell ‘c-a-t’ without assistance—or whether "We the People" still possess the courage, and the desire, to reclaim what has been taken from us.
Because the alternative isn't patriotism.
It's demanding everyone look like you, think like you, worship like you, and obey like you—or they don't belong.
And that's not America. That's a cult.
Keep reading...
Show less
Trump's just a sickening blip in America's history — and this holiday proves it
America turns 250 this year. If you were around for the bicentennial in 1976 you probably remember it like I do. I was an 11 year-old preteen obsessed with presidents but not yet old enough to understand the experiment called democracy I was celebrating.
I remember red, white and blue everywhere. In our neighborhood, every porch or window had a flag. People proudly, and without partisanship, displayed them. I collected ‘76 decals and bumper stickers, the round ones, and stuck them on the wall above my bed, and on my bike.
I can recall having red, white and blue spokecards clipped to my spokes that clicked as I pedaled. My family and our neighbors all gathered at North Park in the North Hills of Pittsburgh for a barbecue and watched a giant fireworks display.
To a young, patriotic boy like me, the bicentennial was a big deal. That’s why I can vividly recall it. There’s that, and the fact that I have an unmatched memory. The pride was everywhere, and it didn't belong to anyone in particular. It belonged to all of us.
A few weeks ago I was pulling out of my garage. The car in front of me had two enormous American flags hanging out of the back windows. And the first thought that popped into my head, before I could stop it, was, “A Trump supporter."
That's what I thought. Not "there's a patriot." Not "there's someone who loves this country." Just there’s a Trump supporter. And it was then I realized this is nothing at all like 1976.
How did that happen? How did I get to a place where seeing my own flag makes me flinch instead of swell with pride? Because somewhere along the way, Donald Trump hijacked it. He and his movement wrapped themselves in the flag so completely that now, in most cases, you can't see one without a Trump flag flying right next to it.
It really makes you sick. Trump banners have zero place next to an American flag. This is a fool who has spent a decade attacking the pillars of democracy, the courts, the press, the peaceful transfer of power, the very idea of a fair election, and on and on and on.
Somehow, he has made himself the face of the flag that's supposed to represent all of us.
But you know what? He hasn't won, and he never will.
Trump is not forever. MAGA is not forever. Movements like this fizzle out, and history is not on their side. He is a speed bump in the long race of American democracy, not the finish line. I believed that at 11 years old without fully understanding why, and I believe it now with 250 years of evidence behind me.
Look at what he's turned this birthday into. He's tried to shoehorn himself into America's 250th on the National Mall, and by every account, it's been a horrific mess. Thin to non-exist crowds, logistical failures, a “state fair” built around one man instead of a country's vivid history.
He'll give his “big speech” on July 4th. It will be the meandering slop of a deranged man. He said there will be the biggest fireworks ever. Well, if it’s anything like his state fair on the National Mall, they will be ho-hum.
But none of it matters. And do you know why? It’s because democracy was never supposed to live on the National Mall at some cockamanie state fair. It lives on our blocks. In our neighborhoods. In the way people wave from a porch ladened with flags, the way my neighbors did in 1976, simply because we were all Americans together.
So I’m going to ignore him for one day, even though my job as a journalist is to keep tabs on him. And all of us should ignore him too.
He’s like a deadly cancer, spreading everywhere. He is in every headline, every breaking news alert, every conversation, every single day of our lives. Let him have those days. Not this one.
And, not while he's reportedly pocketed roughly $2 billion during his second term, and now flies around on a luxury jet gifted by Qatar, all while pretending to preside over America's birthday.
He’s about as patriotic as Vladimir Putin, and that comparison would actually make him happy, so there’s your proof about how “American” he is.
Fly your flag this Fourth of July. Fly it proudly, and don't let him have it. Enjoy your friends, your family, your neighbors, because we are still, despite everything, a democracy. It is on us, not him, to make sure there's a 251st birthday, and a 252nd, and a 253rd.
Go back to the Constitution. Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. *Happiness.* Go find that word in the Magna Carta, or in the founding documents of almost any other nation on earth. You won't.
We promised something bigger, and that’s the right to chase joy. That is what makes this country different, and it is exactly what Donald Trump has spent years trying to steal from us - joy - piece by piece, grift by grift, insult by insult, lie by lie.
The best way to fight back is simple. Be happy anyway. Be proud anyway. Laugh about it all.
So this Fourth of July, F-Trump for every way he's tried to make us miserable. F-him for the liberty he's chipped away at. F-him for the corrosion he's dragged through our public life. F-him for all of it, because this day has nothing to do with him. He has contributed nothing to the survival of this democracy. We have. We're the ones who will outlast him, who will keep chasing that life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness long after he's a footnote.
God bless America. Happy 250th birthday.
Keep reading...
Show less
The spectacular implosion of Trump's big bash shows America is finished with this clown
If you’re feeling that the celebration of the 250th anniversary of the United States has been hijacked by a narcissistic, political hack, you’re not alone. Instead of a joyous event for all Americans, our holiday has been plagued by vicious attacks on those who haven’t drunk the Make America Great Again Kool-Aid. And the results are proof positive that we, the people, are not going for it.
Not one bit.
One of the primary “celebrations” was the Great American State Fair held on the National Mall this week. Supposedly showcasing the history of the 50 states, a whopping 20 states decided to skip the event entirely. Not because they’re not proud of their state or didn’t want to tell the wonderful tales about the vast diversity and beauty of this place we call home, but because President Donald Trump turned it into a political rally for himself instead of a birthday party for all Americans.
Most of the musicians and entertainers who were booked cancelled as it morphed into a staged event for Trump. Those few that didn’t cancel had very sparse crowds sprinkled over the lawn in one of the most embarrassing displays of just how historically unpopular our current president and his attempts to divide, not unite, Americans are with the populace.
Despite Trump claiming a crowd of 45,000 people, about 1,000 showed up. Of course this is totally in line with his self-aggrandizing exaggerations across the board since he lives in a fantasy world where he is worshipped and adored.
But the stunning failure of the Great American State Fair isn’t alone in demonstrating the fact that Americans have grown very tired of this particular reality TV show clown. Consider these events of the last week:
- The Supreme Court ruled against Trump’s executive order attempting to overturn the Constitution’s guarantee of birthright citizenship. It’s not where we came from, it’s where we are; and those born here are Americans.
- The president’s former attorney, Ty Cobb, reflecting on the financial declaration showing the president and his sons have garnered more than a billion dollars from sketchy crypto sources called it “the greatest onslaught of corruption in the history of mankind” adding “he creates policies that can only enrich himself and his family, is something that I think the average American should be staggered by.”
- A federal judge blocked Trump’s executive order that the U.S. Postal Service could not deliver mail ballots in states that had not surrendered their voter role information to the federal government, thus halting one of his most obvious and odious attempts to rig the coming elections in which his MAGA allies are predicted to lose badly.
- Even the Social Security Administration’s latest list of popular baby names puts “Donald” at its lowest point since the 1880s.
The takeaway is clear — Americans are not happy that our nation’s birthday has been hijacked and degraded. We are not happy with being intentionally divided instead of united in celebration of our history. We are not happy that those who fought and died to establish this nation — and all those who have struggled to keep democracy alive since then — have been shoved to the side by a gilded grifter.
Trump is not who we are as Americans and Montanans. We are the nation of “all men are created equal,” and on this 250th celebration of our founding, the great challenge is to live up to that promise, to be the united, not the divided, states — and to continue to forcefully reject these self-serving, despicable efforts to drive us apart.
Daily Montanan is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Daily Montanan maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Darrell Ehrlick for questions: info@dailymontanan.com.
Keep reading...
Show less
This eerily quiet summer means Trump is finished — or he's about to unleash hell
This column grimly spent a spring predicting a dark summer of possible chaos and violence, an administration on the move, power grabs at every turn, one preparing for an unpredictable but authoritarian fall season. We would endure a lot of hot weather, late nights, some dangerous dynamics, and Kalshi had odds at 40% that Portland would be ashes by June 15th.
This worry followed protests in Minnesota, the fear of troops coming to Chicago, and everything else you surely remember. Well, the heat came to the East Coast. But nothing else, not yet.
Indeed, so far, if one had to pick a theme or feel for what's happening, it would be a catchy viral meme about what's not happening. "The summer that wasn't."
We are passing through the nation's 250th birthday, the biggest annual summer holiday, made infinitely bigger by the incredible number, and yet it looks like it'll go by largely unnoticed, except for skipping work on Friday, maybe hearing some booms late at night Saturday. One would have expected baited anticipation, pride, and massive celebrations planned everywhere, or at least that would have been the expectation back 10 years ago, "normal America."
I went to a big gathering in my city's central park to watch the U.S. play in the World Cup on big screens with a big crowd — nice weather. Yes, people supported the American team, but not with the passion, anticipation, or hypertension otherwise expected. Everyone's support seemed a bit muted, as if we weren't sure "which" America this team represented. They wore white, not red or blue. If one said, "It's actually the whole country's team," most would reply, "Right. But, again, which country?"
Everyone knows the cause.
Instead of a celebration of the good that this country has done in its years (while acknowledging the horrific), as per usual, the President of the United States made the entire thing, everything official, at least, not about America but about him. Yes, of course, your city park will still have the earnest city band or orchestra playing in the evening and then fireworks. But the tone is set by the institutions functioning as the nation's cerebellum: the White House, Capitol Hill, the Supreme Court, the Mall. Trump took it all over and made it a MAGA rally. About him.
Well that will blow a tire for the 60% of the nation that is exhausted by this man, consumed with disdain and fury. Interestingly, though, there's some evidence that even Trump supporters don't like having the Fourth of July a personal celebration of Donald Trump, as if they, too, have actually found a line in the sand upon which even they won't cross. He cannot take over everything. Kinda like if he named every NFL team "Trump," like the Buffalo Trump, the Dallas Trump, Seattle Trump, all of them. That would be too far, guaranteed. Perhaps this is, too.
No, no one is fooled. He damn sure can try to take over elections, has taken over the Department of Justice, the military, and planted his face on banners in a Stalinesque way throughout Washington. He can take over most things, and most of those things are the really important ones, as opposed to the "Great National State Fair" that invisibly passed us by and the big celebration planned for the actual Fourth of July — a rally, about him, always, his greatness, a nation relegated to nothing but a stage.
Is it possible that even MAGAs never wanted at least this part?
There are other factors. Yes, there is the heat. Yes, you better believe gas prices play a role. Lots more. And yet the number of artists who checked out after hearing the agenda, the lagging ticket requests before the weather report, the bizarre claw of the UFC fight on the White House lawn, a "Fair" no one asked for, and the fact that Washington is empty, all point to something deeper. Kind of like the U.S. soccer team, it's possible everyone agreed we'd have official "Safe Spots," areas relied on to rest from politics — a "timeout." Is it possible that people from the furthest left, to the most extreme 15% of MAGA muckers, all just want to eat a cheeseburger in a backyard, enjoy a day off, maybe even read in the AC? Sick of it all? Not sure which America we're celebrating, only knowing it's not Donald Trump personally?
Well, something is happening because nothing is happening!
It appears that our kids are out of school, mine seems to be home a lot — which normally indicates something "summery." That weirdly fascinating soccer stuff is on television, and we get to see some kinda cool costumes and customs from around the world. Hollywood released a handful of massive budget movies. Most people have Friday off. There is some evidence that it's summer's big holiday and a lot saying it's not supposed to be like this.
All of this might be an important development; it is possible it is an important element, and it's certainly better than an extreme alternative. But there's also the chance that we're seeing a delay of the dangers to which this column previously pointed. Is this the silence before the storm? Do we all just demand a Fourth of July, especially a 250th (!) without it being centered on "Donald J. Trump," want to be on our best behavior while hosting the world, and only afterwards will we then threaten 250 years by trying to rip the politically beating hearts out of one another toward Labor Day?
And does Trump have plans for late summer? September? Kids back in school, no World Cup, vacations over, working again, drifting into Fall, and then lowers the hammer? The speculation might sound paranoid were it not so damned warranted, given recent history and the stakes at play. Democrats are about to win back control of a critical branch of government. Nothing in Trump's past indicates he'll stand by, sufficiently medicated to just let it happen, and then just move on.
Maybe it makes sense that summer is passing us by wholly unnoticed. Everyone is too tired and terrified of pointing to a flag, whether over the Mall or on a soccer uniform, and saying, "Let's go USA." That just confuses everyone. "Which one?" or "It's under repair, road work" (Now that is a sign of summer), both sound legitimate.
But so does "don't say anything! Don't light a fuse!"
Don't know. You don't know. No one knows, and that's the point. Even Trump, who certainly knows what he might plan for later, sure didn't know he'd be mostly ignored. All anybody knows is that it's 95 degrees and it's not supposed to snow Saturday - must be summer, the summer that wasn't.
And wow, for the love of God, one would've thought this would be huge, just ten years ago. The 250th? World Cup? What could possibly have happened in one decade?
What happened is the biggest threat to that nation since 1861 — and that 1861 Fourth of July passed rather muted, too — the nation had been at war for three months, and the first battle just down the road from Washington was three weeks away. At least the country had its greatest president during such a dangerous time. We're going through it with a less predictable, less educated, and less narcissistic Jefferson Davis as president of both sides.
Our cannons are quiet for now. Maybe that's why summer silently slips by unnoticed - we're terrified of the alternative.
Jason Miciak is a Rawstory Columnist, former Editor of Occupied Democrats, political consultant, author, attorney, and single parent girldad. Please follow on Bluesky, and he can be reached at jasonmiciak@gmail.com. He does read, appreciate, and learn from the comments.
Keep reading...
Show less
Trump has a bomb ticking in the White House — and he plans for it to blow up the midterms
Somewhere inside the White House right now, there’s a federal intelligence report sitting in a drawer, and Trump’s lickspittles who put it there are betting you won’t see it before you vote in November.
It’s an assessment of the security of America’s voting machines, produced by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and Reuters revealed last month that White House officials have spent months refusing to authorize its release, even as the 2026 midterms come barreling toward us.
The findings are almost comic in their irony, but they could also become the weapon that brings down our democracy this November. I’ll get to that in a moment, but first the backstory.
Tulsi Gabbard launched this whole investigation to dig up proof of Donald Trump’s endlessly repeated lie that voting machines stole the 2020 election from him. What her people reportedly found instead was that some states are running outdated equipment that ought to be patched, and that there’s no evidence anywhere that a single vote was flipped or manipulated.
So the one document that could actually help election officials harden their systems before Election Day has been buried, precisely because it tells the opposite of the story the president wanted told.
And consider who now controls that report. Gabbard stepped down this spring, and now Trump has installed Bill Pulte as acting director of national intelligence, a man who runs the federal housing agency and chairs Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, has no intelligence background whatsoever, and didn’t even hold a security clearance until days before he walked in the door.
He reportedly showed up early, asking for a list of every employee so he could decide whom to fire, floated cutting hundreds of intelligence jobs (a Putin dream for decades), and wondered aloud whether he could carry the President’s Daily Brief home with him.
Trump has been remarkably candid about why Pulte is there, telling reporters that his new spy chief may “find out some things about the rigged elections.”
David Becker of the Center for Election Innovation and Research, who works with election officials in both parties, warned that Pulte appears handpicked precisely because he embraces the same 2020 lies Gabbard chased for 18 months and could never prove.
Elections lawyer Marc Elias put it more bluntly, calling the appointment a straightforward attempt to seize control of our elections, and Senator Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, called Pulte a “national security threat”.
So, the person who’ll decide whether that voting-machine report ever sees daylight, and what gets done with the weaknesses it describes, is now the president’s hand-picked election man, a guy who at Housing was willing to violate the standards of his office and common decency to dig into Letitia James’ and Adam Schiff’s mortgage records just to make Trump happy that he could then punish them with lawfare.
That by itself would be a scandal in any other administration: a regime that talks about election integrity from sunup to sundown is sitting on the very report that could improve it. But the worry that’s been keeping voting-rights lawyers awake runs in a direction most Americans haven’t yet let themselves imagine.
Back in February, the Guardian’s George Chidi walked through how this could unfold.
After the FBI raided Fulton County’s election office and hauled off 2020 materials, Trump went on Dan Bongino’s podcast and announced that Republicans should “nationalize the voting” and “take over” elections in 15 places.
That same week, we learned Gabbard had quietly trucked voting machines out of Puerto Rico to hunt for vulnerabilities. Set those moves next to each other, as the Campaign Legal Center’s Bruce Spiva did, and the pattern becomes shockingly clear.
“This is not a coincidence,” he said.
Trump’s March executive order declared a national emergency over supposed foreign interference in our elections, invoking a 2018 order called EO 13848 and the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
Miles Taylor, who helped draft 13848 when he was at Homeland Security and is a regular guest on my radio/TV program, told the Guardian they wrote it “to create a mechanism for sanctions, not to empower the director of national intelligence to fiddle with elections.”
But that law lets a president block the use of “property” like voting machines and tabulators that he claims are tainted while an investigation grinds on, and he never has to prove a thing. He can, in other words, selectively seize the machine that registered your vote this November and refuse to release it until long after people are sworn into office.
Disinformation researcher Joohn Choe validated that concern, pointing out that this fall the federal government could start seizing machines across the country, classify the supposed evidence, and then tell judges it can’t reveal what it’s looking for or how long it’ll take because national security forbids it.
“States would not be able to certify what they would not be able to access,” Choe said.
Picture what that would do to a close election. If federal agents declared a swath of digital voting machines (from heavily Democratic parts of swing states or in critical elections) off-limits in the last week of October, you’d get a cascade of emergency court hearings, county election directors scrambling to print and hand-count ballots they never planned for, early voting collapsing in the targeted places, and the results of a handful of razor-thin House races hanging unresolved for weeks.
Trump wouldn’t need to flip a single vote to steal a chamber of Congress; he’d only need to make the counting impossible in the right districts at the right moment, then let the chaos and the lawsuits do the rest.
That’s the scenario Eric Levitz mapped out in a chillingly plausible Vox analysis that’s been circulating among election experts. The old fear was that Trump would invoke the Insurrection Act and send the military to grab ballots on election night: this version the experts now consider more likely is quieter and far harder to fight.
As Derek Clinger of the University of Wisconsin’s State Democracy Research Initiative put it, Fulton County points toward a seizure of ballots “conducted with the appearance of a legal process,” which is both more probable and tougher to challenge while the clock is running.
Wendy Weiser of the Brennan Center told Vox that anyone still doubting this administration is laying the groundwork to interfere in our elections should now have those doubts erased.
And this is where that buried report comes back into the picture. A federal document, stamped with intelligence-community authority and describing machine “vulnerabilities,” is exactly the kind of prop a White House could pull out of the drawer in late October and wave in front of the cameras as the official-sounding justification for declaring machines compromised and votes thus not counted.
No source has yet reported that’s the plan, but that’s sure my read of where these pieces point. And with Trump, it isn’t hard to imagine how a report written to chase a lie, then held in reserve, could end up serving as the excuse for the very seizure the experts are warning about.
The Founders saw this coming, which is why they deliberately handed the running of elections to the states rather than to a national executive who might tip the scales. The federal judge who permanently blocked Trump’s March order last fall said exactly that, but Trump and his toadies appear hell-bent on ignoring this court as they have so many others over the past 18 months.
And every strongman of the last century who set out to capture a democracy began by capturing the machinery that decides who won, almost always under the banner of an emergency and an investigation.
When Louise and I lived in Germany in the early 1980s, I spent evenings with older Germans who’d been young in the 1930s, and the thing that haunted me wasn’t the violence they described. It was how ordinary each step felt while it was happening, how every move was cloaked in legal language and official reassurance, right up until the morning they understood the ballot no longer meant anything.
It’s all starting to come into focus: the report in the drawer, Pulte parked atop the intelligence community, the Postal Service rewriting its rules to choke off mail-in ballots in the very states that lean Democratic, the demands for voter rolls, and the gerrymanders.
And all of it springs from the one hard fact that the American people have spent the better part of a half-century rejecting what the GOP is selling:
Without his treasonous deal with Iran to hold the hostages, Reagan never would have become president; without his brother purging 10,000 Black people from the rolls weeks before the 2000 election, George W. Bush would have lost to Al Gore; without Russia and Facebook skewing the messaging toward Trump in 2016, Hillary would have become president.
Fifty years of representing $40 trillion in trickle-down tax cuts put on the national debt and then shoveled into billionaires’ money bins while everyone else’s wages flatlined, 50 years of culture-war crusades against queer, Black, and Hispanic people designed to keep working folks fighting each other instead of looking up at who’s picking their pockets: the voters have finally had enough of all of it.
They want their damn middle class back, the one we had before Reagan killed the unions, stopped enforcing anti-monopoly laws, gutted higher education, told us government was the problem, and the morbidly rich among us started pulling away from the rest on the foundations of their tax cuts.
A party with something real to offer ordinary Americans wouldn’t need to seize the machines and gut the mail to hold onto power: the rigging is their confession that they’ve already lost the argument.
The special elections held so far this cycle have mostly gone against Trump, and his earlier schemes to rig the maps and purge the rolls have run into one legal wall after another, which is probably what’s driving these extreme measures.
Even Chuck Schumer says Democrats already have teams of senators and lawyers war-gaming every angle of attack, with people in place “to make sure they count the votes fairly.” The courts and the states still hold the line, but a line only holds when the people behind it are paying attention.
So pay attention, and then act. Call your members of Congress through the Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121 and demand that the ODNI report be released now, while there’s still time to patch the systems it describes, instead of being saved as a weapon for October to set aside our votes.
Check your own registration and find your polling place at vote.org, keep an eye on your state’s election rules through openstates.org, and program the Election Protection hotline, 866-OUR-VOTE, into your phone before the fall so you’ll have it the moment something looks wrong at your precinct.
Like the early 2000s in Russia and Hungary, this is the season when democracies are either defended or quietly lost, and the defending falls to ordinary people like us who refuse to look away.
If this piece helped you understand what’s at stake, share it with the friends and family who still think the midterms will simply happen the way midterms always have, and forward it to someone who can volunteer as a poll worker or an election observer this November.
The more of us who see the drawer they’re hiding this report in, the harder it becomes for anyone to use it against us. Support independent journalism, subscribe and share the Hartmann Report, and let’s make sure every vote in 2026 is cast, counted, and honored.
My newest book, Who Killed the American Dream?: The Greatest Political Crime Ever Told is now available for presale from bookstores nationwide. It’s a modern-day telling of the “murder mystery” of how, in 1886, a great crime was committed against America by a cynical court reporter and an on-the-take Supreme Court justice that changed the course of American politics and led straight to Citizens United. It also details the massive ongoing cover-up of this crime and what we can do to fight back.
Keep reading...
Show less
This madness is just a warning of what the Supreme Court is about to do
The language of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution could not be plainer when it comes to birthright citizenship. It says that if you were born or naturalized here, you’re a citizen. Period. End of story.
There is no debate.
And yet, there was.
This is settled law. To pretend otherwise is to play into the hands of this tyrannical administration and complicit Supreme Court. The idea that the breakdown of the vote upholding birthright citizenship was just 6-3 – and really 5-4, considering that Justice Brett Kavanaugh voted with the majority to strike down Trump’s executive order but disagreed on Constitutional grounds – should chill us to the bone.
It should have been 9-0.
It's madness that the highest court in the land is making believe this is a real debate, and the fact we skated through this time with this foundational right protected should give us more than pause. It serves as a warning that nothing is sacred, and it could well be different next time. Because trust me, there will be a next time – possibly sooner than we think.
I’ll take the win. But my god, what in living hell is wrong with Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito (who strikes me as the unhappiest man on earth) and Neil Gorsuch? Why are they so determined to carry Trump’s water and do his bidding? Why do they so hate Black and brown people, and why do they see it as their mission to overturn the Constitution to serve their racist agendas and fulfill the president’s white supremacist aspirations?
Thomas’ dissent was 91 pages, nearly four times the length of Chief Justice John Roberts’ 26-page majority opinion. Roberts said, “Under the Constitution, they are citizens at birth.” Exactly. It didn’t require 26 pages. It didn’t even merit 26 words. Eight was enough.
Thomas wrote in his dissent, “The Court adds to the sad history of the Fourteenth Amendment, which was designed and understood to secure equal rights for the freed blacks (following the Civil War) but has instead been repurposed for political projects that the Reconstruction Congress did not support.”
What a complete load of crap.
Of course, Trump wasn’t going to just blithely accept it, either. The man utterly lacks the ability to take a loss graciously, as we are only too aware. Shortly after the decision was announced, he took to Truth Social to basically promise to push for Congressional legislation and render moot this whole “long and unwieldy Constitutional Amendment.”
That’s right, the Constitution is so 1898. It’s now 2026. What are we doing following a document that’s generations out of date? Certainly, Trump has no use for it. Heck, he doesn’t have any use for the judiciary, either.
It isn’t as if Trump is following any principles in his willy-nilly smash-and-grab on immigration. Imprisoning people by the thousands in barbaric detention centers hardly shows any respect for the rule of law, much less morality and decency.
I doubt Trump views Tuesday’s ruling on birthright citizenship as anything more than a minor inconvenience to be skirted, much as he sees Monday’s ruling on states being able to count late-arriving election ballots as much more than a suggestion.
In fact, let’s take a deeper dive into how the idea of stopping the counting of late-arriving mailed ballots postmarked by Election Day wound up at the Supreme Court in the first place. The Republican National Committee challenged it, as if the very idea of continuing to count ballots inferred fraud.
Everyone knows the elections in the United States are fair, with almost zero non-citizens voting. No election to date has been compromised by unfair practices. The only one attempting to cheat/rig/scam/game the system is Trump. That’s what the SAVE Act is all about.
You already understand all of this, of course – and that’s really the point. There is no doubt that, for instance, the 2020 Election was anything but a straight-up vote. But Republicans play a game of Let’s Pretend because their master demands it. And the Supreme Court lends credence to it by the simple act of taking up a ridiculous non-issue like late-arriving ballots.
Trump has never bothered to explain how cheating occurs with mail-in ballots, much less late-arriving ones, mostly because there is no explanation. There are no extra ballots floating around. They are only sent to registered voters. If ballots are not properly executed or they appear to have been tampered with, they’re summarily tossed out. Evidence would require a legitimate question where none exists.
But of course, there is never anything to back up Trump’s blather. Why does the high court bother granting it validity? My guess is it knows this lawless administration could at any moment ignore its power and rulings and go fully rogue – which, if we’re being honest, looks as if it may happen anyway.
I’m guessing Trump will figure out a way to pack the Postal Regulatory Commission to do his bidding on mail-in ballots, SAVE Act or no SAVE Act. In the face of resistance, he just does whatever he wants, and what he wants in this case is to force everyone who votes to provide documentary proof of U.S. citizenship and ban mail-in voting, particularly in blue states.
How can Trump skirt the law to do it? Watch him. He figures out a way. My hope is, of course, that no matter what kind of bull he tries to pull off, it won’t work. Republicans vote by mail, too – as does he – and hanging their midterm hopes on suppressing the vote is just as likely to backfire this time.
A larger question may be what Trump will do once he loses in November. It could be another January 6-style insurrection, but bigger. This time, he’s got his Proud Boys/Oath Keepers/Three Percenters militia to call upon to counter the results of a free and fair election in an even more organized way.
I can see it now: Justices Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch donning their robes, defiantly raising their gavels and leading the charge of the ICE brigade. They fear not, as they know the anarchic king they created will pardon them.
(Ray Richmond is a longtime journalist/author and an adjunct professor at Chapman University in Orange, CA.)
Keep reading...
Show less
GOP's infighting belittled by ferocious battle swallowing one of its own
When Rep. Tom Kean went missing from Congress for nearly four months, the speculation ran wild. Where was he? Was he hiding something? Was his marriage in trouble? Had he done something to be ashamed of?
Reporters camped outside his New Jersey home. A colleague said he hadn't heard from him. The mystery became a campaign issue in a swing district that could help decide control of the House.
I never wondered what was wrong with him. I knew. And quite frankly, I wanted to scream at everyone, "Leave the guy alone. He needs space, and lots of it."
Today, Kean stood on the House floor and confirmed it: severe depression, a long hospital stay, a diagnosis he didn't see coming and couldn't put a timeline on. "It is physical. It is emotional," he said. "Until you experience it yourself, it is difficult to fully understand how powerful this illness can be."
It's a trite saying, but in this case it's right on the mark: truer words have never been spoken.
I have experienced it. I've written and spoken for years about the suicide attempts, the ICU stays, a Thanksgiving Day overdose, days in a psych ward. I've written about the alcohol I used to numb the pain through a lifetime.
And I've written about a two-week disability leave that became an entire year as I fought to recover. I disappeared. I had to. I had no choice.
So when the news broke about Kean, I didn't see a politician dodging accountability or inventing a clever excuse to go off the grid. I saw a man doing the only thing severe depression most of the time allows — disappearing.
That's the part people outside this illness rarely understand. It isn't just a temporary sadness, or a bad week. When I started telling friends and family why I'd gone incommunicado, more than one person said, "Oh, I get depressed all the time."
That is not what this is. Emphatically not. Kean is right: you only get it if you've lived it.
It is your mind turning against the very mechanisms that let you function, your judgment, your sense of worth, your ability to imagine tomorrow might be better. It all disappears, replaced by overwhelming hopelessness.
When it hits that hard, showing up becomes physically impossible. Not difficult. Impossible. The instinct isn't to explain yourself to colleagues, constituents, or the press. The instinct is to retreat, to vanish from a world that suddenly feels like it's only watching you fail. And fail miserably.
And everywhere you look, and I mean everywhere, there's darkness. No light. It's a fright I wouldn't wish on my worst enemy.
Writing these words and recalling that pain is cathartic, but it's also difficult to face the road ahead when you're filled with anguish.
That's why it's so exhausting to finally admit you need help. You fall apart to the point where help is the only way to survive. But up against that reality is the stigma of the disease. At least it was for me. Not only did I think I didn't need a psychiatrist or therapist, I worried about what others would think of me.
When I went on disability after being diagnosed, I came back after a couple of weeks and found myself treated like damaged goods. I was sidelined, regarded with the caution people reserve for something they don't understand and would rather not deal with.
Compare it to someone returning from surgery or a broken bone. Their desk is filled with balloons and cards. That didn't happen to me.
That treatment didn't help me heal. It did the opposite. I went back out on disability, and this time I stayed out for nearly ten months. The job that was supposed to be waiting for me wasn't really waiting. The colleagues who should have offered support offered distance instead.
That’s why it’s so important not to come back to the real world until you’re ready.
Part of the awkwardness from others is the fact that the stigma is still very real, and it punishes the very people trying to do the responsible thing by stepping back to get well. In defense of those who were awkward toward me, I've learned over the years, they simply didn't know how to respond.
This is why I believe Kean deserves credit, not criticism, for both halves of the choice he made. He was right to go silent when he needed to, because for those of us who've been there, silence is sometimes the only form of self-preservation available. Severe depression does not negotiate with your calendar or your campaign schedule.
And he was right to come forward today, because disclosure is the only thing that ever actually loosens the grip of stigma. Every politician, every public figure, every ordinary person who says "this happened to me, and here is what it looked like" makes it a little easier for the next person to ask for help instead of disappearing for good.
When I went through it, I craved hearing other people's survival stories, because they gave me hope for my own. I always said that if writing about my experience helped even one person, it was enough. I know Kean feels the same way.
Recovery, for me, has never come from sheer willpower alone, though it helped at times. It came from psychiatric care, from therapy, from medication, and eventually from getting honest about how much alcohol I was using to numb what therapy was trying to surface.
None of that happens while you're still showing up, pretending to be normal for the people around you. Getting better requires stepping fully away from your life so you can rebuild it, out of view, on your own timeline, without an audience grading your recovery in real time.
Kean said that asking for help isn't a weakness, it's a strength. I say that often, and I'm glad he said it from the floor of the House, where it will reach people who might never read something like this.
The more of us who say it, in whatever rooms we're given, the smaller that stigma gets, and the more people might choose to come forward instead of disappearing for good.
Keep reading...
Show less
Trump's humiliation is tinged by stark signs of Supreme Court insanity
Today, the Supreme Court struck down Trump’s Day One executive order canceling the right to birthright citizenship. Good. That executive order declared that children born in the U.S. would not be considered citizens if their parents were living in the country illegally or were visiting the country on temporary visas.
The executive order never took effect. It was quickly blocked by multiple lower courts because it appeared to directly conflict with the 14th Amendment, which states that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.”
The Trump regime appealed the lower-court rulings, contending that the 14th Amendment’s citizenship provision had been misunderstood for more than a century. The administration argued that the drafters of the amendment were focused on guaranteeing citizenship for the children of former slaves—and that the amendment was never intended to extend citizenship to the children of people who weren’t living in the country legally.
Trump and his Solicitor General, who argued this case before the Court, also said that narrowing birthright citizenship was necessary to prevent “birth tourism” — the practice of immigrants coming to the U.S. to give birth here and obtain citizenship for their child.
Trump has been vowing to try to change the law since entering politics in 2015, arguing the 14th Amendment was written specifically to enshrine the rights of freed slaves. His critics have countered that it was always designed to apply to the children of immigrants too. An 1898 Supreme Court decision confirmed that U.S.-born children of immigrant parents are entitled to American citizenship.
Today, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that the deeply-rooted understanding that virtually everyone born on American soil is automatically a U.S. citizen was enshrined in the Constitution with the passage of the 14th Amendment in 1868: “Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights — to freely participate in our political community,” Roberts wrote. “The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to every free-born person in this land. We keep that promise today.”
In another era, this would have been a no-brainer. No constitutional lawyer I know thought the Court would decide otherwise. The lower federal courts had consistently and unanimously ruled against Trump.
Had Trump won, it would have probably caused panic among recent immigrants and their families. Although Trump has insisted his policy would apply only to future births, it was far from clear that the logic of any win for Trump wouldn’t apply retrospectively if a future president (JD Vance? perish the thought) wanted to go there.
What I find troubling is that the decision was 5 to 4 rather than unanimous or nearly so, as it should have been.
Only five of the nine justices ruled against Trump on constitutional grounds. Brett Kavanaugh dissented on statutory grounds; while agreeing that Trump’s executive order was unlawful, he argued that the court should have resolved the case under federal immigration law rather than the Constitution.
The Court’s three most conservative justices — Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, and Samuel Alito — dissented. Thomas wrote for the group: “The Court adds to the sad history of the Fourteenth Amendment, which was designed and understood to secure equal rights for the freed Blacks but has instead been repurposed for political projects that the Reconstruction Congress did not support.”
Pure and utter claptrap.
Thomas, Gorsuch, and Alito are so far to the right of America that their views on this case and other matters should be presumed bonkers. Yet what’s particularly sobering is that Trump is only one justice away from having a Supreme Court majority that would have gone his way on this absurd reading of the 14th Amendment.
Clearly, the Supreme Court must be changed — either by expanding the number of justices or by invoking term limits on Supreme Court justices. The Constitution would permit both remedies.
Perhaps the best thing about today’s majority decision is that it’s such a direct repudiation of Trump, who has long taken a personal interest in the issue. During his 2024 campaign, he made curtailing birthright citizenship a key element of his immigration platform.
When the high court heard arguments on the case in April, Trump took the unprecedented step of showing up in person for the hearing, making him the first sitting president ever to attend a Supreme Court argument. For the Court to so directly reject his position today is surely a humiliation for Trump.
- Robert Reich is an emeritus professor of public policy at Berkeley and former secretary of labor. His writings can be found at https://robertreich.substack.com/. His new memoir, Coming Up Short, can be found wherever you buy books. You can also support local bookstores nationally by ordering the book at bookshop.org
Keep reading...
Show less
Hell and fury narrowly avoided as Supreme Court says no to Trump
For one day, at least, the Constitution held, and in the chaotic and disjointed time we are living in, and where we hold our breath awaiting the rulings of an overtly bigoted Supreme Court, that is saying an awful lot.
The court today struck down President Donald Trump's executive order attempting to strip birthright citizenship from children born on U.S. soil to undocumented or non-permanent-resident parents. In doing so, it reaffirmed one of the oldest and most sacred guarantees in American life: if you are born here, you are an American.
No exceptions for the status of your parents, no second-class tier of citizenship invented by a president acting alone. It is a relief, and it should not have been in doubt, and because it was, it was an example of how far our open democracy has closed up.
What we have retained today is an America where hundreds of thousands of U.S.-born children are instantly granted automatic citizenship, securely integrated into their communities with full social services, education, and employment rights, and where their families achieve permanent status without facing the threat of arbitrary deportation.
We have avoided a system where birth certificates require complex parental status checks and state health departments are forced to act as immigration enforcers. It would have created a disenfranchised subclass.
In other words, if SCOTUS had acquiesced to Trump, all hell and fury would have broken loose, and the 14th Amendment shredded to pieces.
The 14th Amendment wasn't an accident or a loophole or an afterthought. It was written in the wake of the Civil War, specifically to overturn Dred Scott and guarantee, in plain language, that anyone born here belonged here, regardless of what their parents had been forced to endure, regardless of where their bloodline started.
For a century and a half, that promise has held. The Supreme Court itself affirmed it in 1898 in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, ruling that a man born in San Francisco to Chinese immigrant parents, parents who could not even become citizens themselves under the racist laws of the era, was as American as anyone else in this country by virtue of his birth alone.
Today's ruling holds that line. A child's legal status belongs to them alone, entirely free from the politics, status, or actions of their parents. A baby born in a Texas hospital is an American citizen by right, not by the permission of whoever happens to occupy the White House or a court that is chock-full of narrow-minded conservatives.
Trump’s executive order was so bad that in early 2025, U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour in Seattle blocked the policy, slamming it as "blatantly unconstitutional." The Reagan-appointed judge used scathing language, stating that in his four decades on the bench, he had never seen such a clear violation of law. Rebuking the executive overreach, Coughenour declared, "to our president the rule of law is but an impediment to his policy goals," warning that history judges harshly when the legal system fails to stand up to unlawful actions.
The children of immigrants, including immigrants who arrived undocumented or with nothing but hope, have become some of the people who define what America is. They have shaped and bolstered our economy.
This country's culture, science, economy and even its politics were built in no small part by Americans whose parents came here without papers, without money, and without permission, and whose children were citizens anyway because the Constitution said so.
Today's ruling means that story continues. It means the next generation of doctors, engineers, athletes, and artists born in this country will still get to claim it as their own by right of birth, the same as every generation before them.
The ruling is also a reminder that the Constitution cannot be rewritten by executive order, no matter how forcefully Trump and his ill-advised ilk wishes it could. It confirms what that judge in Seattle, and really what a century and a half of precedent had already found, that the 14th Amendment means what it says, and no president gets to amend it unilaterally.
That matters beyond this single case. It comes against the backdrop of an administration and a Supreme Court that has also moved to strip Temporary Protected Status from Haitian and Syrian nationals and taken a death-knell posture toward asylum seekers at the southern border.
Today's ruling doesn't undo those horrific policies, but it draws a clear line the administration cannot cross, explicitly saying that birthright citizenship is no one’s to revoke.
The fight over who belongs in this country is far from over, and this ruling will not be the last word on immigration policy under this administration. In all probability, this ruling today might be a one-off, and that’s the tragedy of it all.
But for today, the Constitution's plainest, oldest promise to the children born on this soil remains intact. That's worth marking, celebrating, and worth defending the next time it's tested.
Keep reading...
Show less
Trump's about to be drowned in American Flag Blue
Nick Anderson is a Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist.
Trump's crooks are scared to death by what's happening right outside the White House
You can hear the whispering in the White House across the Mall from the Smithsonian Aviation Museum, "Well, that didn't work, and that's bad — really bad." They're talking about the "Great American State Fair."
Aaron Rupar, the Left's irreplaceable and most deeply embedded intel agent, captured Fox News's inability to paper over a debacle devoid of people.
Did the rapture happen overnight? Fox & Friends is broadcasting from a completely empty Trump state fair on the National Mall.
There seems to be little risk in ruling out the rapture as an explanation. After all, we're still here, and if one actually reads the Gospels, whether you consider those words divine or secular, the message marks Jesus as history's most influential progressive, and thus liberals who follow Jesus's real message sit firmly ensconced pretty much anywhere but the Great American State Fair.
To be fair, no one's followers bothered to show up, either, and that's both good and bad. Certainly more good than bad, but still...
This week marks this nation's 250th birthday, a date which any self-respecting nation should find notable enough to stand somewhat proud — or if not proud, a nation populated by committed citizens, people with at least interest or agency. And there's our first clue to the problem, the "self-respecting nation" part.
Most liberals believe that the Trump regime exists, at least in large part, to block us from respecting what remains "our" country. No shame in that, he does call us the nation's biggest "enemies." It would be bizarre to feel warm loyalty to a country whose leader labels you not just an outsider, but an outsider for whom he has plans, dark plans
More interestingly, it looks undeniable that even MAGA has lost respect for the country under Trump.
Interesting. They are the ones who use "MAGA" interchangeably with "Patriot." It is probably even more important to note that, while the stereotypical liberal enjoys workshopping their latest novel at an effete coffee shop, or attending a MOMA somewhere, not even MAGAs will deny that they were born to attend a good fair, with a rodeo, country or gospel music, those corny games that promise stuffed animals bigger than your date, and a good elephant ear. (Stop here for a moment. Once a decade, a good elephant ear is really, really good. Liberalism can also be practical, and coffee is only coffee, whereas an elephant ear...)
And yet the MAGAs born to be there didn't show up, either. So what's up?
First, the practical — very practical. There are fewer and fewer Americans who can travel nationally to attend an actual State fair, never mind travel to one of America's most expensive cities to enjoy a "National Fair." Survey after survey shows that Americans' primary concern is "affordability," and thus likely plan to spend less money even at the county fair. So the price of literally everything, from gas to food, is likely holding a lot of people back.
But let's get to the reason behind those White House whispers.
Like anything else undertaken by the federal government under this regime, Trump himself stamped personal ownership on this event. Up to this point in history, Trump affiliation alone — a fair masquerading as a rally — would motivate many MAGAs to sacrifice the prices and show their support. And yet, not only are they not showing up, but the White House likely senses this may be less about "affordability" and more about "affiliation." It has been a long time since Trump has had a clear win, polling is way down, and he seems doomed to some clear losses in the near future. Everyone, even MAGAs — maybe especially MAGAs — are weary of close association with a clear loser.
It might go even deeper. It might well be that even MAGA has its limits as to what it will let Trump personally claim. Perhaps they will even allow him to "own" Air Force One, but maybe not personally own what should have been "our" birthday. The cynics commenting below will say, "No chance, MAGA has no limit..." and they will be right describing some MAGAs. But even MAGA voters' values still lie on a spectrum, and the evidence in front of our faces demands explanations.
Rejecting Trump affiliation might be explanation number one. Which doesn't mean liberals won.
This column spent much of the late spring warning about a hot summer burning with unrest, possible real clashes between protesters and law enforcement, violence, which would do nothing but play directly into Trump's hands. So far, we've seen almost none of it, thankfully. But it might have been good to see the National Fair surrounded by protesters, reminding everyone that the country used to be at least "more" fair, even while admitting it's never been close to fair for all. But even that hasn't happened.
Right now, it's hard to escape the sense that the issue could be that the subject is "America." Most Americans are just too tired to give a s--t. If Trump and MAGA are nothing else, they're exhausting, and perhaps, they, too, are exhausted.
Now, that's really, really bad news for a White House that exists only upon the premise that enough Trump followers care so much about him that their loyalty and protection remain non-negotiable: from stealing 747s to Trump actively resisting investigating Epstein, all but forcing even his supporters to admit, "It sure looks like the guy doesn't want anyone to know what happened back then." There is no Trump regime without "Trumpers."
Fine, but, never mind back then, Trump still needs protection in the here and now, and on a lot more issues than just Epstein and personal planes, or what happened on Epstein's personal plane, and if the White House senses that his followers are distancing themselves from him, such as not attending what was a "personal rally" in the form of a national fair, that has to constitute not a "huge" worry, but "the" worry.
And yet, that only means that Democrats should care now more than ever, now sailing with the wind, finally, a chance to hand Trump an anchor. Granted, Democratic inaction is harder to read than MAGA motivation, but it still sits out there as a possible concern.
The United States needs intense, invested, and imaginative changes. Right now, the country sails almost rudderless as Trump and his gang enrich themselves; MAGA voters definitely have plans to make things worse. But if we can be sure of anything, it is that any real change requires a lot of people to really care. They will, if pressed. But Dems? Dem leaders?
You care.
You wouldn't be reading this if you didn't. Can we be sure enough of us care, or — worse yet — can we be sure that our leaders care? Hakeem Jeffries is not standing on a podium just outside the Mall speaking in front of 50,000 people about making America itself "more fair."
That seems a bit "off."
It sure looks like Trump's voters care less and less, preferring to keep their distance while saving some money. And that has to scare the sh... spit out of the White House, which cares dearly about one thing — saving dear leader. You can be damn sure that the more distance MAGA voters put between them and him, the more willingly Trump makes fast changes of the most horrific type, the type that doesn't so much ruin a celebration as negate it.
But have no doubt, the Mall remains empty, and it's empty for reasons important to both sides. Whatever those reasons might be, none are good for the White House. It doesn't take an elephant ear to hear the whispers.
"This sucks."
They don't even know how right they are.
Jason Miciak is a Rawstory Columnist, former editor of Occupy Democrats, political consultant, author, attorney, and single girldad. Please follow him on Bluesky, and he can be reached at jasonmiciak@gmail.com. He does read and respond to comments and appreciates just how much can be learned in doing so.
Keep reading...
Show less
Trump lawsuit backfires as he's ordered to reveal his darkest secrets
The failure of the American media is one of the biggest disappointments of the last 11 years.
Instead of standing together and standing their ground with integrity and dignity when Trump began bullying them in 2015, media organizations let him wear them down with his never-ending litany of insults. Once a toxic narcissist knows they can get away with it, they’ll just keep hurting you and taking things from you.
Our media never properly pushed back against Trump because, before his 2016 campaign, they’d never had to defend themselves against personal attacks from a candidate or a president. They went from treating him like the joke he should have always been to giving him absolute power over their newsrooms. While we’ve seen individual moments of pushback here and there, Trump ultimately prevails every time. Either he makes the reporter the story by bullying them, or he gets away with not answering their questions because he’s too busy scapegoating them as a distraction from whatever he was asked about.
It disgusts me every time, because no one stands together on that press line. I don’t care which outlet you work for — when Trump bullies one reporter, he’s bullying them all. They should be demanding the answers he refuses to give, because that’s their job. But they should also be demanding that he stop treating their colleagues like a middle school bully.
From the outside, it might look like it’s too late. Every news outlet we once trusted is now owned by a billionaire with their own personal political agendas. While ABC beefs with the FCC over Jimmy Kimmel, CBS’s full capitulation to Trump is complete. And now, David Ellison is about to do the same to CNN by putting Bari Weiss in charge there as well.
Everything about this is anti-American. Our First Amendment rights are being violated by an oligarch class that’s been allowed to take over far too many media outlets, and with the White House now targeting members of the independent media, how long before Trump tries to shut down the internet so no one can talk about the Epstein Files or his failing health?
There are many ways to fight back against male white corporate oppression, however, and one news network is setting the examples for all of us to follow. And there’s no way the FCC can intervene on Trump’s behalf this time, because it’s not an American network.
All hail the venerable British Broadcasting Company (BBC), both on television and over the wireless, as they used to say. The BBC has always set the standard for journalism, and that’s remained true during the Trumpian nightmare garbage fire.
Because he can’t control them.
He can sue them, however, because that’s what Trump does whenever anyone with a big enough audience tells the truth about him. It’s a favorite con of his, burying and then bankrupting his enemies with endless depositions and appeals.
Trump is desperate to rewrite the history of his failed coup after losing the 2020 election to Joe Biden, despite all of the footage that’s still readily available to everyone.
So, of course, Trump is now suing the BBC for $10 BILLION, crying “defamation” after it aired a documentary about the January 6th insurrection, in which they used some of the footage of his Ellipsis speech that he claims was “edited.” Yes, the same speech that was live-streamed by all of the MAGA terrorists in the crowd, just like the subsequent attack on the Capitol.
While plenty of other institutions have caved to Trump, the stiff upper lips at the BBC aren’t intimidated so easily. In fact, they’re going after what the January 6th House Select Committee never could get: Trump’s January 6th phone records.
Discovery is glorious, especially when it’s used for good. Not only are they asking for Trump’s phone records from the Day of Rage, but also the days leading up to his desperately violent attempt to stay in power.
But they’re not stopping with Trump’s actions regarding January 6th; the BBC has also served a subpoena related to his revocable trust, which is run by Don Jr. It contains private information on the Trump Crime Family’s assets and business relationships, so just imagine what the BBC might find if they gain access to all of Trump’s financials.
It’ll be interesting to see how this plays out. Trump’s phone records would show whether or not he ever called any state’s governor to have them send their National Guard troops to the Capitol to fight off the MAGA crowds. We already have the footage of Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer essentially co-Presidenting by taking the action Trump never did and, hopefully, the BBC will also use this clip as part of its defense should the lawsuit go to trial.
Any American news outlet could have done the same as the BBC, even without a lawsuit against them, but they haven’t, and they won’t.
We all know the truth about January 6th because we were all witnesses. Whether we watched it online or on TV, the live feeds were readily available and were recorded. Trump may have pardoned everyone he could in connection with January 6th as a part of his revisionist history (except Marjorie Taylor Greene, she wrote while very much savoring the schadenfreude), but the BBC has all of the same receipts that we have.
Trump will be forced to drop this suit and post that it was another “witch hunt,” or some other tired line, because this case is unwinnable for him. If he keeps moving forward, he’ll be exposed under discovery in multiple ways. He’s never threatened to sue anyone for saying he’s in the Epstein Files, which tells you plenty about how much he fears the discovery process.
American media outlets need to follow the BBC’s example and start telling the truth about Trump again.
Keep reading...
Show less
Copyright © 2026 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 |
Masthead
|
Privacy Policy
|
Manage Preferences
|
Debug Logs
For corrections contact
corrections@rawstory.com
, for support contact
support@rawstory.com
.
