Exclude NB

President Donald Trump sparked outrage when he suggested awarding himself the Congressional Medal of Honor during a speech in Rome, Georgia at the Coosa Steel Corporation. Trump, who never served in the military, joked that he considered giving himself the decoration reserved for military members who exhibit valor. He claimed he was "extremely brave," but noted that military recipients have suffered severe injuries. Trump made a similar comment in 2019. The remarks ignited backlash on social media, with critics calling his comments "profoundly, offensively disgusting." Former Biden White House staffer Andrew Bates referenced Trump's history of cutting VA benefits. Florida gubernatorial candidate David Jolly urged voters to "send a very loud, undeniable message in November." Other commentators described Trump's behavior as childish and compared him to a "cartoon character."

Watch the video below.

President Donald Trump drew criticism for his response to Fox News' Peter Doocy on Thursday in Air Force One, according to observers. When asked whether other Jeffrey Epstein associates should be arrested following Prince Andrew's arrest, rather than address the question directly, Trump claimed to be an "expert" because he had been "totally exonerated" and stated he "did nothing." He asserted that Epstein "was against me" and "was fighting me in the election," citing the recently released 3 million pages of Epstein documents. Trump's comments deflected focus from the original question about accountability for Epstein's associates. Social media observers criticized his response as self-incriminating. Professor Adam Cochran posted that there has "literally never been a guiltier-sounding person." The Atlantic's Tom Nichols sarcastically noted it was "a normal answer you'd expect from someone who isn't at all concerned."

Watch the video below.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh, a Trump appointee, filed a dissent in the 6-3 Supreme Court decision clamping down on Trump's ability to bypass Congress and levy tariffs unilaterally. Breaking with conservative Justices John Roberts, Amy Coney Barrett, and Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh expressed concern about practical consequences rather than legal precedent. He warned that while the ruling may not significantly restrict presidential tariff authority going forward, it will create "serious practical consequences in the near term." Kavanaugh specifically worried about refunding billions of dollars collected from importers, noting the Court offered no guidance on whether or how the government should return the funds. He acknowledged during oral argument that the refund process would likely be a "mess." Kavanaugh's dissent focused on administrative burden rather than constitutional grounds for Trump's tariff authority.

Watch the video below.

President Donald Trump criticized liberal justices following the Supreme Court's 6-3 ruling against his tariff authority. In his first public comments on the decision during a White House press briefing, Trump called the ruling "deeply disappointing." He accused Democratic justices of automatically voting against his policies, stating they "will automatically vote 'no'" regardless of merit. Trump claimed these justices are "a disgrace to our nation" and opposed anything that makes "America strong, healthy and great again." He characterized their voting pattern as predictable and suggested their loyalty to a political agenda was unwavering. Trump asserted he had exercised restraint with his tariff approach, claiming he tried to be "very well-behaved" and "modest" in his requests to avoid influencing the court's decision, suggesting he understood how justices could be "easily swayed."

Watch the video below.

President Donald Trump attacked the Supreme Court's 6-3 ruling against his tariff authority, calling the decision "ridiculous." The court determined Trump acted outside his authority when imposing tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA, rendering a significant portion of his tariffs as unlawful. Trump expressed outrage at the decision during a White House address, claiming the court prevented him from charging tariffs while permitting embargoes and trade restrictions. He said, "I can do anything I want to do to them, but I can't charge any money," adding, "so I'm allowed to destroy the country, but I can't charge them a little fee." Trump has centered much of his presidency on tariff policy and previously warned the ruling could cause a $2 trillion "catastrophe" and reduce the United States to "almost Third World status."

Watch the video below.

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 against the Trump administration Friday morning, determining that the president exceeded his authority in imposing reciprocal tariffs. The decision is expected to send shockwaves globally and has already infuriated Trump. The president had grown increasingly panicked ahead of the ruling, lashing out at justices and warning of a potential $2 trillion "catastrophe" if his tariffs were struck down. He also cautioned that the United States could be "reduced to almost Third World status" if the tariffs were overruled. Americans are bracing for potential economic impact, with concerns that the government may need to refund tariffs already collected. Social media users expressed alarm about additional taxes charged to consumers — with some demanding refunds.

Watch the video below.

Political commentator Christopher Bucktin argued that ex-Prince Andrew's arrest on misconduct charges Thursday could have significant implications in the United States. Bucktin describes the arrest as "almost surreal," signaling that status alone no longer protects powerful individuals from criminal investigation. He references Attorney General Pam Bondi's warning that investigating everyone mentioned in Jeffrey Epstein's files could "bring down the government," suggesting Andrew's arrest represents a shift in accountability. Bucktin contends that the UK's willingness to pursue credible allegations against powerful figures puts pressure on the US to act similarly. He argues that the Epstein case extends beyond one individual to an entire ecosystem of influence involving wealth, power, and institutional protection. Bucktin asserts that justice cannot exempt elite figures for political sensitivity reasons, and Andrew's arrest could signal that no title provides immunity from the law.

Watch the video below.

Jonathan Reiner, former cardiologist to Vice President Dick Cheney, challenged RFK Jr.'s assertion that Americans are the sickest population on the planet. Health and Human Services Secretary RFK Jr. made the claim during an appearance on Theo Von's podcast, attributing America's health crisis to ultra-processed foods and government misinformation about disease. He cited statistics showing childhood obesity increasing from one in five to 40 percent overweight, with 70 percent of children's food being ultra-processed. RFK Jr. also said the federal government spends $4.3 trillion annually on chronic disease treatment, accounting for 40 cents of every tax dollar. Reiner disagreed with RFK Jr.'s characterization, writing that while Americans could improve health through better eating and vaccination, calling them the world's sickest population is inaccurate.

Ex-Prince Andrew, British King Charles III's younger brother, was arrested by Thames Valley police on Thursday on suspicion of misconduct in public office in connection with the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. Andrew was stripped of his royal titles in October and forced to vacate his home earlier this month. He has denied wrongdoing but appears multiple times in files released by the U.S. Department of Justice, as does President Donald Trump, who was close friends with Epstein. The arrest has prompted widespread commentary about the contrast between accountability in Britain versus the United States. Critics note that Andrew faces charges for misconduct in public office—the exact charge the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled American presidents cannot be prosecuted for. Commentators highlighted the irony that a British royal faces greater legal accountability than the American president.

Watch video below.

GOP strategist Shermichael Singleton clashed with CNN host Abby Phillip during a heated panel discussion on "NewsNight" about the Trump administration's anti-diversity initiatives. Multiple panelists argued that the second Trump administration has made dismantling diversity programs central to its policy platform. Singleton objected, claiming that characterizing anti-diversity positions as racist confuses voters. Phillip challenged his statement, pointing out that he had essentially equated being anti-diversity with racism. She then highlighted specific examples of the administration's explicit anti-diversity actions, including the Department of Defense undoing diversity initiatives and banning Black History Month celebrations. Singleton reacted defensively, insisting his issue was not with calling the administration anti-diversity, but with the characterization of the entire Republican Party as racist.

Watch video below.

Abigail Shry, a Trump supporter with a history of making violent and racist threats, fled after failing to report to a federal correctional facility in Tallahassee, Florida. Shry pleaded guilty last November to threatening U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan after the judge was assigned to oversee Trump's federal election interference case. She warned the judge: "If Trump doesn't get elected in 2024, we're coming to kill you. So tread lightly." Shry also allegedly threatened to kill then-Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee and her family. A federal judge in Houston has issued a warrant for her arrest. In 2023, Shry threatened an armed attack on the Texas Capitol if Attorney General Ken Paxton were impeached, stating: "We will take weapons, come to Austin, and annihilate the government."

Watch video below.

Federal Judge Cynthia Rufe showed frustration after the Trump administration failed to comply with her order to return a slavery exhibit to a museum at the site of George Washington's former home in Philadelphia. In her initial Monday ruling, Rufe invoked George Orwell's dystopian novel "1984," warning against allowing the government to "dissemble and disassemble historical truths." She stated, "As if the Ministry of Truth in George Orwell's 1984 now existed, with its motto 'Ignorance is Strength,' this Court is now asked to determine whether the federal government has the power it claims—to dissemble and disassemble historical truths when it has some domain over historical facts," she said, adding it does not. After the Trump administration appealed without complying, Rufe issued a late-Wednesday ruling setting a Friday deadline for restoration, emphasizing her court's authority to enforce its own orders.

Watch video below.

Democratic analyst Adam Mockler criticized President Trump's Board of Peace initiative after press secretary Karoline Leavitt revealed Trump will oversee a $5 billion investment to rebuild Gaza. Mockler described the revelation as "absolutely sickening," noting that Trump is now "essentially currently the President of the Gaza Strip, even though he can't even manage the United States." He characterized the board as the "de facto ruler of the Gaza Strip." Mockler pointed out that Trump's previous peace deal between Israel and Gaza collapsed within a day, with Hamas continuing violence and Israel pursuing strikes, starvation tactics, and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, all while conducting illegal settlements in the West Bank. Mockler continued, emphasizing Israel has not been reined in and the Gaza war has not officially ended, only "slowed down to a halt."