All posts tagged "capitol police"

'Republicans didn't care': Mike Johnson shredded by critics over bold Capitol Police claim

Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) is drawing flak online after accusing Democrats of attacking a Capitol Police officer in what he alleged was a political stunt.

One video shows Democrats marching to Johnson's office, chanting, “What is he afraid of?” “Epstein!”

The crowd chanted "swear her in," speaking of Rep.-elect Adelita Grijalva (D-AZ), who was elected a few weeks ago in a special election. Her vote will be the final signature necessary to force a vote on releasing the investigation files of Jeffrey Epstein.

"Congress passed a law to require the hanging of a plaque to commemorate the officers who defended the Capitol on January 6, which Mike Johnson has since declined to give direction to do," wrote CNN senior reporter Edward-Isaac Dover. He added, "However," and then posted the video of Johnson from Wednesday morning's press conference.

Rep. Yassamin Ansari (D-AZ) questioned, "Oh really." She added a screen capture of the headline: 'A Betrayal, a Mockery': Police Express Outrage Over Trump's Jan. 6 Pardons.

"Sorry, what were you saying, Mike?" questioned journalist Dan Przygoda. He posted a clip of the Jan. 6 attack on the officers and attempted to breach the police line guarding the Capitol.

"For the 8,000th time, I’m forced to respond with ……. Like this?" asked business owner Ron Shillman, including a photo of the crowd pushing the bike racks against the police to try and break the line.

Megan Coyne, a former White House staffer, wrote, "Google 'Capitol police officer assaulted' to learn more."

Policy associate Scott Moore at the Searchlight Institute made the same point, "Look up Capitol police officer violence to learn more!"

"I think this is much worse," MSNBC contributor Rotimi Adeoye said, posting a photo of one of the officers with blood in his mouth being smashed in a revolving door.

"Bulls---. Trump pardoned hundreds of cop beaters. Republicans said nothing," the House Homeland Security Committee Democrats wrote.

"What a liar. Won’t put up the plaque these guys and women deserve. Lying liar," tennis legend Martina Navratilova said.


Cory Booker staffer arrested as Senator delivers marathon speech

As Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) continued a marathon floor speech which had passed 18 hours by Tuesday afternoon — protesting President Donald Trump's agenda — news was released that one of his staffers was taken into custody by Capitol Police, according to Politico.

Authorities said they arrested the staffer, Kevin Batts, for allegedly carrying a gun without a license.

Batts reportedly told officers outside the Senate galleries Monday that he was armed. The department said Batts had been led by Booker around security screening at a congressional office building earlier that day.

ALSO READ: The new guy in charge of USAID doesn't believe in foreign aid

Booker's spokesperson Jeff Giertz said, "Senator Booker’s office employs a retired Newark police detective as a New Jersey-based driver who often accompanies him to events. We are working to better understand the circumstances around this.”

In a statement, the Capitol Police said, "All weapons are prohibited from Capitol Grounds, even if you are a retired law enforcement officer, or have a permit to carry in another state or the District of Columbia."

Read the Politico article here.

EXCLUSIVE: House Republicans subpoena ex-Capitol Police intel head for Jan. 6 inquiry

Julie Farnam, who supervised intelligence gathering for the U.S. Capitol Police at the time of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack, has received a subpoena to appear for a deposition by a Republican-controlled House subcommittee investigating security failures that day.

“We are investigating the alleged failures within USCP IICD leading up to January 6 to assess what legislative reforms, if any, are needed,” Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-GA), chair of the House Administration Oversight Subcommittee, told Farnam in a letter that she received late Friday.

The subpoena sets up a confrontation between two pivotal — if somewhat under-the-radar — figures in the Jan. 6 attack saga, which three-and-a-half years on remains an unresolved matter for many Americans.

Loudermilk personally led a tour of the U.S. House buildings complex on Jan. 5, 2021 — the day before the attack on the Capitol — involving people who traveled to Washington, D.C., to support then-President Donald Trump’s effort to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.

ALSO READ: 8 ways convicted felon Donald Trump doesn't become president

Farnam served as assistant director of the Intelligence and Interagency Coordination Division at the Capitol Police at the time of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack.

Raw Story exclusively reported last month that Farnam anticipated being called before the subcommittee.

Farnam previously told Raw Story last that she believes Loudermilk is dragging her before the subcommittee as a way to deflect from his own role in the events of Jan. 6.

“I think he does have some involvement in January 6th,” she said, “and these hearings are designed to distract from the truth.”

A prescient warning

Farnam wrote an intelligence assessment on Jan. 3 that provided a prescient warning about the threat of violence by Trump supporters who were becoming increasingly unhinged due to the looming certification of the election.

“This sense of desperation and disappointment may lead to more of an incentive to become violent,” Farnam’s assessment warned. “Unlike previous post-election protests, the targets of the pro-Trump supporters are not necessarily counter-protestors, as they were previously, but, rather, Congress itself is the target on the 6th.”

Farnam gave a briefing to commanders, including then-Assistant Chief Yogananda Pittman, on Jan. 4, telling them, according to her recollection: “Stop the Steal has the propensity for attracting white supremacists, militia groups, groups like the Proud Boys. There are multiple social media posts saying that people are going to be coming armed, and it’s potentially a very dangerous situation.”

ALSO READ: Biden in hot water with AOC: ‘It’s wrong. It’s not okay.’

Farnam and others who have previously spoken to the now-disbanded House Select January 6 Committee said there were no questions after her presentation.

Sean Gallagher, now assistant chief of police for uniformed operations, told the House Select January 6 Committee that it was fair to say that Farnam’s warning did not prompt the Capitol Police to make any operational changes.

By the time thousands of pro-Trump protesters began breaching a U.S. Capitol security perimeter on Jan. 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol Police were overwhelmed and unable to stop throngs of people who illegally entered the Capitol complex, and in many cases, injured law enforcement officials, terrorized members of Congress, stole government property and trashed the premises.

Despite Farnam’s efforts to warn commanders of the threat of violence on Jan. 6, the Republican-led subcommittee chaired by Loudermilk has faulted her for the security breakdown at the Capitol that day.

Capitol rioters Capitol rioters on Jan. 6, 2021, in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Saul Loeb for AFP)

An “initial findings” report released by Loudermilk’s subcommittee in March complained that the most alarming content was “buried” near the end of Farnam’s intelligence assessment, while blaming the intelligence division for leaving the Capitol Police leadership “uninformed and unable to properly plan.”

Meanwhile, the Republican majority has given former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund, who was aware of the Jan. 4 conference call but did not attend, a sympathetic hearing.

Sund testified before the subcommittee last September that “no intel agencies or units sounded the alarm.”

“We were blindsided,” he said. “Intelligence failed operations.”

Shifting blame away from Trump

The Republican majority’s favorable treatment of Sund compared to Farnam falls under a larger effort to shift blame from Trump, who summoned supporters to Washington, D.C., on Jan. 6 with the promise that it would be “wild.”

Republicans — some of whom have downplayed the violence at the U.S. Capitol altogether — have attempted to shift blame to then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who fled the Capitol alongside other members of Congress as violent Trump supporters disrupted and delayed Congress’ certification of 2020 presidential electoral votes.

The topline of the subcommittee’s interim report accuses the House Select January 6 Committee, which Pelosi appointed, of pursuing a “pre-determined narrative that President Trump was responsible for the breach.”

ALSO READ: How Donald Trump could run for president — and lead the nation — from prison

Instead, the report by the Loudermilk subcommittee blames the attack on the “politicization” of the U.S. Capitol security apparatus. They accuse Pelosi of exerting political pressure on Capitol security operations through the House sergeant at arms, whose duties as chief law enforcement and protocol officer for the House include maintaining order and assessing threats.

The report also includes a section complaining that the House Select January 6 Committee “made unfounded allegations against members of Congress” and “specifically targeted Subcommittee Chairman Barry Loudermilk.”

In a public letter to Loudermilk, Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MS) noted that video of Loudermilk’s Jan. 5, 2021, tour of the Capitol showed individuals filming hallways, staircases and security checkpoints.

Thompson noted that some of the individuals attended Trump’s stop-the-steal rally at the Ellipse the next day, including one who was captured on video noting that the Capitol was “surrounded” and that the rioters were “coming” for Pelosi and other Democratic members.

The subpoena calls for Farnam to appear for a deposition before the subcommittee at the O’Neill House Office Building on June 21.

Under the subcommittee rules, only Farnam, her lawyer, subcommittee members and their staff, and an official reporter may attend the deposition.

"Aw, such a big man @RepLoudermilk!" Farnam wrote Friday evening in a post on X. "You feel so big and strong? Remember when you were asked to speak to Congress about #J6 and were too cowardly to do so? I do. I'll show for your deposition. One of us has some balls."



Farnam — today a candidate in the Democratic primary for an open seat on the Arlington County Board in northern Virginia, which will be decided on June 18 — previously told Raw Story that she is concerned that by deposing her behind closed doors, the Republican majority will be able to cherry-pick her words “and construe it however they want.”

Under the subcommittee rules, the Democratic minority members may object to the selective release of testimony, transcripts or recordings. But such concerns would be resolved by a vote of the subcommittee, where Republicans hold the majority.

The rules provide members of the Republican majority and Democratic minority equal time to question Farnam.



‘MIA MTG’: Why Marjorie Taylor Greene has no publicly listed district offices

ROME, Ga. — When a man threatened in November to use a sniper rifle to assassinate Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, the Georgia Republican’s team responded by swiftly shutting down her congressional district office in Dalton, Ga.

And it wasn’t the first time that Greene shut down an official district office — her Rome, Ga. office quietly closed a year prior and remains closed.

Greene’s one remaining district office is publicly unlisted and unadvertised, her congressional spokesman confirmed. In order to visit, constituents must fill out a meeting request form on Greene’s website or set up an appointment by phone, where only then they will be given the physical address of her office, said Nick Dyer, who requested the office address not be publicized citing security concerns.

Short of someone divining the existence of Greene’s all-but-secret district redoubt, or being told about it by a staffer in Washington, D.C., it publicly appears Greene has no official, fixed district office at all.

Greene’s congressional website directs constituents in Georgia’s 14th District to literally talk to a wall — they’re pointed to Box 829 inside Dalton’s U.S. Post Office. The same goes for her campaign office, which sends people not to a bustling hive of re-election activity, but to a gold, postcard-sized mailbox in a UPS store in a strip mall in Rome.

PO boxesRep. Marjorie Taylor Greene's campaign office uses Box 142 (second row, five in) for her campaign office address. The office has no physical space listed publicly. (Photo by Alexandria Jacobson/Raw Story)

Security concerns for Greene certainly seem serious — she said she receives death threats “on an almost daily basis,” and she’s taken expensive measures to enhance her security protection, including a $65,000 fence around her home in Rome.

But some constituents perceive a lack of Greene’s presence in her sprawling district in Northwest Georgia, leaving them frustrated and wondering if she cares more about burnishing her national image than helping locals. Some of Greene’s constituents are turning to other legislators — including Georgia’s two Democratic U.S. senators — when they need assistance.

In his experience, Garry Baldwin, a military veteran and former mayor of Aragon, Ga., said Greene doesn’t do enough to bring “living wage” jobs to the district or to address the “frustrating” experiences with understaffed local Veterans Affairs offices.

“Everybody’s fed up with Marjorie Taylor Greene. She doesn't represent us. We're not getting anything, any benefit of her being our representative. Period,” said Baldwin, a Democrat. “She doesn't have a physical office in the district. She’s got a P.O. box. She’s got a telephone number and all you get is a voicemail.”

Calls placed to Greene congressional staff members at the phone numbers for the congresswoman’s D.C. and Dalton, Ga., offices went to voicemail — and remained unreturned at the time of publication.

Greene’s campaign committee did not respond to Raw Story’s request for comment.

Dyer did not respond to Raw Story’s request for comment prior to publication but spoke with Raw Story by phone after publication. This story has been updated accordingly.

From a federal office building to a P.O. box

Greene used to have a district office in the federal building that houses a courthouse in Rome, Ga., recalled Wendy Davis, a former city commissioner for Rome, Ga., who ran in the Democratic primary for the 14th District seat in 2022. Davis lost in the primary to Marcus Flowers, who in turn lost to Greene by more than 30 percentage points despite raising more than $15.6 million.

“A lot of people were unhappy that she closed the Rome office, but more people heard that there was a Rome office when she closed it, if that makes sense,” Davis said.

At the time of publication, Greene’s office did not confirm why her Rome office closed in 2022, and for months, she failed to answer questions from local reporters about the impending closure. Local media reported on major changes within the federal building that included relocations of a post office and an FBI office along with rearrangement of courtrooms.

“The federal building is extremely difficult for people to access,” Dyer later told Raw Story on Tuesday. “The traffic was virtually zero, and to save taxpayers money, to put things into hiring more staff for the Dalton office, that office was closed.”

Federal building in Rome, Ga.Greene used to have a congressional office at the Federal Building in Rome, Ga. (Photo by Alexandria Jacobson/Raw Story)

Davis said the federal building is “very secure,” requiring visitors to go through metal detectors, so she theorized that the closure of the office had less to do with “security worries” and more to do with resource allocation with a lack of visitors.

“I’ve always been somebody when I was working with people who were elected officials, I want you to have a lot of offices. If you don't have a lot of offices, have a lot of pop-up offices,” Davis said. “I know it's more complicated in today's more volatile world, but to me, that's one of the things that I can't imagine she holds up and says, ‘this is a great thing I did, closing my office.’”

Greene’s congressional website lists her district office as P.O. Box 829 in Dalton, with no physical address to visit. Her campaign "office" is located at 3 Central Plaza, No. 142, in Rome, which is a mailbox located inside a UPS store in a strip mall that Raw Story recently visited.

UPS storeA UPS store in Rome, Ga., is the location of Greene's campaign office address. (Photo by Alexandria Jacobson/Raw Story)

Clarence Blalock, a candidate in the June 18 Democratic runoff election, with the winner to take on Greene in November, said he — in contrast with Greene — would not sequester himself from constituents.

“Commercial rent’s cheap here,” Blalock said, predicting he’d have at least two or three district offices if he won the election. Blalock said he envisions one office in Paulding County to the South of the 14th District’s boundaries, one in Rome in the central part of the district and one in the northern part of the district, perhaps in Catoosa County, near the Tennessee line.

I want to make sure people know that I'm here. I want to spend more time in the district than her,” Blalock said.

Office politics

Members of Congress aren’t required to have a minimum number of district offices — it’s up to the member how many offices they have and often depends on the “size and makeup of the district,” said Kristin Nicholson, director of the Government Affairs Institute at Georgetown University.

Nicholson, who declined to comment on any specific member, said she previously worked with a legislator who had seven district offices in southern Illinois and another who had just one district office in a much smaller state.

Greene’s 14th Congressional District has a population of more than 765,000 people, according to the 2020 census, which is comparable to most districts in the state, according to figures from the Georgia General Assembly.

All Georgia congressional representatives have at least one physical district congressional office.

Rep. Sanford Bishop, Jr. (D-GA), who represents the state’s 2nd Congressional District, and Rep. Rick Allen (R-GA), who represents the 12th District, each have three district offices. Allen has an additional satellite office, too.

Barry Loudermilk (R-GA), a Donald Trump supporter who led would-be January 6 rioters on a tour of the Capitol the day before, has two offices in Georgia’s 11th Congressional District. One is appointment-only and the other appointment-preferred but allows walk-ins.

Rep. Rich McCormick (R-GA) announced in November that he’d temporarily shutter his 6th Congressional District office in Cummings, Ga. due to threats of violence. He reopened the office just over two weeks later.

“What drives most members in making those decisions is there's generally a big priority placed on being visible and accessible to your constituents,” Nicholson said. “It's sort of up to each member to decide what kind of operation they would set up in their district that would best achieve that goal.”

No matter the size of their district, all House members can have up to 18 full-time staff and four part-time staff, which are often divided among a D.C. office and their district offices, Nicholson said. In reality, because of budget cuts, most members have eight to 10 full-time staff, she said.

The legislators themselves often work out of a main office in their district when they’re not in D.C. in order to meet with constituents or state advocates, as well as engage with their staff, Nicholson said.

“When they're in the district, they certainly aren't tied to an office the same way they are like when they're in D.C. because a lot of that district work is about being out in the communities and attending events and visiting various organizations, sites, schools, businesses, et cetera,” Nicholson said. “But, that district office does tend to at least be sort of like the base of operations where they would come for meetings and that kind of thing.”

Dyer later told Raw Story, ”Congresswoman Greene doesn't work out of that office very often because she's in D.C..”

“Obviously, she does do travel, and obviously, we're stuck in D.C. a lot lately, but she's happy to meet with her constituents and do her job as a member of Congress,” Dyer said.

Dyer said at least one staff member is always in the district office, with as many as six employees and interns there at once.

Phone calls and meeting request forms are monitored daily, and “we get back with every constituent that leaves a voicemail,” Dyer said. Dyer said the congresswoman’s offices get hundreds of calls daily, and “we do our best to get back with every single constituent in a week or less.”

Dyer added: “It may take a few days because we get calls from everywhere, all over the place, that flood our voicemail, and that's part of the reason why we can't answer every single phone call is because we get calls every single day from all over the country, with people either praising Marjorie Taylor Greene, attacking Marjorie Taylor Greene, prank phone calls, people calling because their reps aren't answering, that sort of thing.”

District offices are the “hub for their casework and constituent service,” Nicholson said. Constituents might come to a district office for help accessing federal resources and programs or assistance with issues involving Social Security, Veterans Affairs or immigration, she said.

Dyer estimated that “98 out of 100 times there's no need to be in person for these issues” where constituents might contact a district office, which can be handled remotely, he said.

“We get rave reviews for our constituent services,” Dyer said.

Security threats against legislators have increased in the last four to five years, so members need to strike a balance between their accessibility to constituents and their safety, Nicholson said. In 2023, the U.S. Capitol Police’s Threat Assessment Section investigated 8,008 cases, compared to 7,501 in 2022, noting that threats typically surge in an election year.

The House and Federal Election Commission have expanded allowable expenses on the administrative and campaign sides to include security measures, such as allowing $10,000 from a member’s annual office budget to go toward security needs, Nicholson said.

Particularly in a district where members often don't have access to Capitol Police, those security expenses might include bulletproof glass, security staff and security and locking systems, Nicholson said.

Constituents complain about lack of access to Greene

Some Democrats and Republicans told Raw Story that Greene’s lack of presence is felt throughout the district, and they can’t even access her through public forums like town halls.

“I can't talk to her. You tell me where she is. MIA MTG,” Blalock said. “Where is she? Where's her office?”

Her last known district town hall in April was held in Whitfield County, where advance RSVPs were required and government IDs needed for entry. The address of the event was not released publicly prior.

“Due to her popularity, we have people RSVP so we can get constituents in the door. That is critical for the town halls. They are meant specifically for constituents,” Dyer said. “We have people that would travel from hours away to attend a town hall. We do that explicitly to ensure that only constituents are in the location. Due to the security concerns, we only give verified constituents the address to those town halls.”

Given that hundreds of people attend these events, Greene’s team asks for questions to be submitted on their way into the meeting, Dyer said.

“She goes through personally all of them unless they're offensive,” Dyer said.

A 2022 report by the Center for Effective Lawmaking, a project of the University of Virginia and Vanderbilt University, concluded that the generally “unscripted and often raucous gatherings provide the public with a direct line of communication to their representatives,” and that “legislators with few legislative accomplishments also chose to hold fewer town hall meetings.”

“It's a one-sided messaging platform,” said Rob Nolen, chair of the Catoosa County Democratic Party, who chose not to go to Greene’s most recent meeting but watched the video recording. “I would imagine that the bulk of people there were Republicans and pretty diehard conservatives. There were a lot of people sort of yelling out and speaking out against things she was saying, and she really systematically shut them down. It's just obvious that she wants to be able to say what she wants to say and have that be the soundbite, and there's no substantive discussion.”

Members of Congress might limit their town halls to a “known audience” for legitimate security reasons, Nicholson said. They have the ability to host these events as they please, such as hosting online town halls instead of in-person, she said.

“Vetting the questions in advance, sometimes members do that just to make sure that they can give full, thoughtful responses to questions, and other times, obviously, members are just trying to control what they have to respond to,” Nicholson said.

Greene isn’t a stranger to everyone.

Kelly Thurman, an employee with the Murray County Sheriff’s Office, said he has met Greene and says she “comes pretty regular here to the sheriff’s office. We met her several times. She’s had some town halls here.”

When Greene is in town, it’s usually for “a big Republican meeting or rally,” and she meets with people at restaurants “occasionally,” Davis said.

“I don't feel like she's done the kind of work that a lot of people do of coming and sitting down and meeting with people and just listening to what's going on,” Davis said.

Deric Houston, who captured 14.5 percent of the vote in last month’s 14th Congressional District Democratic primary, said he’s never met Greene because she’s rarely out publicly in the 14th congressional district.

“She’s never in the district. Never in the district,” Houston said. “When she's in the district, she does a town hall. I've seen her do, I think, two town halls in the last six months.”

By comparison, Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-GA), who represents the entire state of Georgia, has visited the 14th Congressional District at least twice since he was elected in 2021, Davis said.

“One time he came and met with a lot of local elected officials, and I've been in politics a long time, I've never seen a U.S. senator sit at a table,” Davis said. “It wasn't about his speechifying. He literally made everyone who had been invited to the table say what was on their mind and what the senator could do or what our community needed and went around the table and his staff actually did follow up from that conversation.”

Shawn Harris, the other Democratic candidate in the runoff election on June 18, said Greene “drives right through” Polk County, where he lives, each week if she’s heading to her home in Rome.

“You can't get to Rome without coming through here when you’re coming from the airport in Atlanta. She never stops. Never stops,” Harris said. “You can ride all over this place, you can't find anybody that says, ‘I talked to Marjorie Taylor Greene right here in Polk County.’ This is a place you just drives through,”

Don Westlake, a Republican and beef producer in Polk County, said one of the reasons he is voting for Harris is because he meets with people in the community unlike Greene.

“I've never met her … what I understand, she lives in Rome, so she has to come through here,” Westlake said. “I've never, never seen her or met her, talked to her. I've never seen her go out and talk.”

Most members find it “pretty vital” to be “present, visible, attending events” and having a robust staff to do casework in the district and be accessible to constituents, Nicholson said.

“Particularly, these days when it's so extremely difficult for most rank and file members to make a big impact legislatively, that constituent service and casework piece of the operation has become even more important than ever because it's a place where they really do have total control,” Nicholson said. “Any member who wants to do good constituent service has that ability, whereas they may not have the ability to get a hundred bills passed into law.”

Greene campaigns on behalf of Donald Trump in Keokuk, Iowa, in January. (CSPAN)

This week, Greene spoke at a rally for Trump in Las Vegas, where she compared the former president, who was convicted on all 34 felony counts in his New York hush money trial, to Jesus Christ.

Greene has rallied on Trump’s behalf throughout the country from Iowa to South Carolina this year.

Greene was in her district Monday for an academy send-off dinner in Dalton for “five young people from the district that are now going to military academies,” Dyer told Raw Story.

This story was updated on June 11 at 1:26 p.m. ET to reflect post-publication comments from Greene spokesperson Nick Dyer.

Revealed: Lawmaker who gave J6ers a Capitol tour targets ex-Capitol Police intel head

The former assistant director of intelligence for the U.S. Capitol Police, who issued a stark warning about the threat of extremist violence days before the Jan. 6 attack, expects to be called to testify before a House subcommittee led by Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-GA) that is focused on shifting blame away from former President Donald Trump.

Julie Farnam told Raw Story she expects “to get a subpoena any day now,” and anticipates that she will be called to testify behind closed doors before Republican members of the House Administration Oversight Subcommittee on June 21.

Farnam said she received an email from subcommittee staff today telling her to expect a subpoena following discussions with her lawyer about scheduling her deposition.

Farnam said she believes the subcommittee is compelling her to testify as a ploy to distract attention from Loudermilk’s actions in the lead-up to the attack.

Loudermilk led a group of would-be J6ers on a tour of the U.S. House buildings complex — including security checkpoints and the entrance to the tunnels leading to the Capitol — on Jan. 5, 2021. Loudermilk ignored requests from the now-decommissioned House Select January 6 Committee to explain why he gave the tour.

ALSO READ: What Trump's weird WWE Hall of Fame speech tells us about his presidential debate strategy

“I think he does have some involvement in January 6th,” Farnam told Raw Story, “and these hearings are designed to distract from the truth.”

Farnam told Raw Story she expects to be deposed behind closed doors, but that she would prefer to testify publicly. She said she is working with her attorney to try to get her own court transcriber so she can keep a transcript of her testimony. She wants to publicly release the transcript.

“I don’t think it’s a coincidence that they’re not having me testify publicly,” Farnam said. “They can take what I say and construe it however they want.”

Following the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, Farnam was promoted to acting director of intelligence for the Capitol Police, but resigned in June 2023. Farnam is currently running as a Democrat for a seat on the Arlington County Board in Virginia.

Mary Beth Burns, a spokesperson for the House Administration Oversight Subcommittee, which is chaired by Loudermilk, declined to comment when reached by Raw Story earlier today.

‘Members of Congress very rarely give tours’

Loudermilk’s committee is relitigating Jan. 6 at a time when Trump faces multiple criminal charges, including indictments brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith and Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis that accuse the former president of conspiracy to subvert the 2020 election.

And it comes at a time when Trump, who is presently on trial in Manhattan for allegedly falsifying business records to cover up a sexual affair that could have damaged his 2016 presidential campaign, is again expected to be the Republican nominee for president.

Farnam has been an implicit target of the Loudermilk committee’s investigation for months.

An interim report released in March by the committee includes a three-page section rejecting any notion that Loudermilk’s tour was connected to the events of Jan. 6.

ALSO READ: 'A fantasy of manhood': Are frat boys the new Proud Boys?

Meanwhile, the report alleged that the Capitol Police’s intelligence division, under Farnam’s leadership, “failed to fully process and disseminate actionable intelligence which directly contributed to the overall security failures at the Capitol.”

The House Select January 6 Committee released video of the Loudermilk tour during the second year of its work. At the time, Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MS), who chaired the January 6 committee, said in a public letter that some of the individuals in the tour group sponsored by Loudermilk were seen at the rally held by Trump at the Ellipse on Jan. 6, 2021.

Thompson cited video showing one of the individuals on the tour. On Jan. 6, 2021, the man carried a sharpened flagpole and made threats against Democratic members of Congress, including then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Senate Majority Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY).

“They got it surrounded,” the man can be heard saying in the video. “It’s all the way up there on the hill, and it’s all the way around, and they’re coming in, coming in like white on rice for Pelosi, Nadler, even you, AOC. We’re coming to take you out and pull you out by your hairs.”

A report issued by the Capitol Police intelligence division roughly two weeks before the attack, warned about a thread on a pro-Trump message board discussing “tunnels on US Capitol grounds used by members of Congress.” Among the user comments cited in the report, one wrote, “Maybe millions of protesters could simply block all the Dems from showing up to Congress. Block all the tunnel entrance [sic].”

U.S. Capitol surveillance footage shows a man on a tour of the House building complex led by Rep. Barry Loudermilk.House Select January 6th Committee

The Capitol Police subsequently reviewed footage of Loudermilk’s tour, and Chief J. Thomas Manger appeared to clear the congressman of wrongdoing in a letter to former Rep. Rodney Davis (R-IL), then the ranking member of the House Administration Committee.

“We train our officers on being alert for people conducting surveillance or reconnaissance, and we do not consider any of the activities we observed as suspicious,” Manger wrote.

Farnam, who was serving as acting director of intelligence for the Capitol Police at the time, signaled she doesn’t share the chief’s assessment.

“I don’t buy his excuse for why,” Farnam told Raw Story. “Members of Congress very rarely give tours themselves. That was odd that he was giving a tour, and it’s less likely that a member would give a tour to people that they don’t know. The day that he gave the tour, there weren’t any tours being given. What was he doing and why was he doing it?"

Loudermilk’s office did not respond to a request for comment.

“He needs to be questioned,” Farnam told Raw Story. “He needs to be on record about what he was doing.”

Farnam pitted against former Capitol Police chief

The interim report issued by Loudermilk’s committee on March 11 took critical aim at an intelligence assessment written by Farnam on Jan. 3, 2021, three days before the attack on the Capitol.

Loudermilk’s report contends that “significant questions remain about the emphasis of actual intelligence” in Farnam’s assessment “and its distribution to [Capitol Police] prior to January 6.”

The committee has assigned a star role to former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund, who testified in an open hearing last September that “no intel agencies or units sounded the alarm” despite having significant intelligence about threats against Congress.

“We were blindsided,” he said. “Intelligence failed operations.”

Farnam has vigorously disputed that claim.

January 6 riot at the Capitol. (Shutterstock.com)

Much of Sund’s testimony focused on his requests for National Guard assistance. The interim report dedicates 10 pages to resistance from the two sergeants at arms for Congress. Former House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving, who at the time reported to Pelosi, told Sund he was concerned about “optics,” according to the former chief.

Since at least July 2021, Republican lawmakers have been attempting to shift blame for the attack on the Capitol from Trump to Pelosi. The former House speaker has said through a spokesperson that she and her staff had no discussions with Irving about National Guard deployment prior to Jan. 6.

The interim report issued by Loudermilk’s committee deflects responsibility from Trump by painting the House Select January 6 Committee as “a political weapon with a singular focus on promoting the narrative that Trump was responsible for the violence on January 6.”

ALSO READ: NFL drafts Capitol Hill staffers for lobbying retreat

Trump summoned his supporters to Washington, D.C. on Jan. 6, 2021, with a tweet that read, “Be there, will be wild.” During his speech at the Ellipse on Jan. 6, he told them to march down to the Capitol and “fight like hell” because if they didn’t, they “were not going to have a country anymore.” Once Trump learned the Capitol was under attack, it took him two hours and 56 minutes to tweet out a video telling the rioters to go home.

Loudermilk told the Christian nationalist podcaster Lance Wallnau that Trump has privately praised him as a “hero.” Loudermilk said Trump specifically praised him for “exposing all these lies” when the congressman joined him backstage at a rally in Georgia before the state’s primary in March.

‘Congress itself is the target’

Farnam said she expects Loudermilk’s committee to ask her about the intelligence she received concerning threats against the Capitol in the run-up to Jan. 6 and how it was distributed.

“I think it’s going to be related to the intel,” she said. “What did we have? They’re going to accuse me of not doing more.”

While the subcommittee is not commenting publicly on Farnam, her 2021 interview with the House Select January 6 Committee and recent comments to Raw Story provide a preview of what she is likely to tell the Republican lawmakers when she testifies next month.

As the lead author of an intelligence assessment issued on Jan. 3, Farnam noted that the finality of the Congress’ decision to certify the election during the joint session on Jan. 6 would likely raise the stakes for the protestors coming to Washington, D.C. that day.

“This sense of desperation and disappointment may lead to more of an incentive to become violent,” the assessment warned. “Unlike previous post-election protests, the targets of the pro-Trump supporters are not necessarily the counter-protestors, as they were previously, but, rather, Congress itself is the target on the 6th.”

Sean P. Gallagher, deputy chief of the protective services bureau, emailed a copy of the intelligence assessment to the chiefs at U.S. Capitol Police on Jan. 3 at 10:40 p.m., while noting that Farnam and her colleague John Donahue at the intelligence division would update commanders during a conference call the following day.

An email provided to Raw Story by Farnam shows that Sund replied at 11:18 p.m. on Jan. 3: “Copy thank you Sean.”

Despite evidence to the contrary, Sund testified before Loudermilk’s committee last September: “We now know that significant intelligence existed that individuals were plotting to storm the Capitol building, target lawmakers and discussing shooting officers. And yet no intel agencies or units sounded the alarm. We were blindsided. Intelligence failed operations.”

Farnam told the House Select January 6th Committee that during the Jan. 4, 2021 conference call, she conveyed the substance of the written assessment, and then added: “Stop the Steal has a propensity for attracting white supremacists, militia groups, groups like the Proud Boys. There are multiple social media posts saying that people are going to be coming armed, and it’s potentially a very dangerous situation.”

Farnam said that at the end of her presentation she received no questions.

Gallagher told the House Select January 6th Committee in January 2022 that he didn’t recall the “specifics” of Farnam’s presentation, but told the committee it was fair to say that her warning didn’t prompt the Capitol Police to make any operational changes.

Farnam told Raw Story she believes Yogananda Pittman, then assistant chief of protective and intelligence operations, briefed Sund on the conference call, but said there’s no paper trail to prove it.

Pittman could not be reached for comment for this story.

“Chief Sund did NOTHING with the intel — no ops plan, no distro to officers, no canceling leave, no staging equipment — that’s on him, not me,” Farnam wrote in an X post on May 23. “Also EVERYONE knew something was going to happen on #J6. It was planned in plain sight.”

Sund could not be reached for comment for this story.

Farnam said when she testifies before Loudermilk’s committee, she expects to be questioned about a romantic relationship she had with Lt. Shane Lamond, her intelligence counterpart at the DC Metropolitan Police Department around the time of Jan. 6.

Lamond was suspended by the police department in early 2022 and subsequently indicted by a federal grand jury for obstruction of justice for allegedly leaking sensitive information to Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio.

Proud Boy Enrique Tarrio (Photo by Chandan Khanna of AFP)

Tarrio, in turn, is currently serving a 22-year prison sentence for seditious conspiracy for his role in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

The relationship between Farnam and Lamond is detailed in Farnam’s book, Domestic Darkness: An Insider’s Account of the January 6 Insurrection and the Future of Right-Wing Extremism, which was recently released by IG Publishing. Farnam resigned from her position at the U.S. Capitol Police in June 2023, after the agency threatened legal action to prevent her from publishing and threatened to refer the matter to law enforcement.

Farnam told Raw Story she met Lamond at a holiday party in December 2020. They had planned to get together on Jan. 7, but wound up going on their first date after President Joe Biden’s inauguration on Jan. 20, 2021. The Capitol Police knew about the relationship, she said, adding that Lamond “never said anything that would make me think there was anything unlawful going on.”

The day Lamond was suspended from the Metropolitan Police Department, Farnam said she went to the FBI and turned over all of her emails with him.

Farnam said she expects that Loudermilk’s committee will use the relationship to try to undermine her credibility.

She said she doesn’t know if the Democratic members of the committee will be present for her interview.

Rep. Norma Torres (D-CA), the ranking member, and Rep. Derek Kilmer (D-WA), the only other Democrat on the panel, could not be reached for comment.

Although she plans to cooperate with the committee, Farnam said she intends to “answer them as narrowly as possible.”

“I don’t want to speak to them,” she said. “I’m being forced to speak to them. I’m not going to offer any more information than the specific answer to the question.”

GOP congressman commemorates Jan. 6 by defending vote against honoring U.S. Capitol police

In the months following the deadly U.S. Capitol insurrection on January 6, 2021, both chambers of Congress voted to award the Congressional Gold Medal — the highest civilian award in the United States along with the Presidential Medal of Freedom — to U.S. Capitol police officers who defended members of Congress during the attack. 21 House Republicans voted no.

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Kentucky), who was one of those 21 no votes, defended his "no" vote on his official X (formerly Twitter) account on the third anniversary of the attack that resulted in five deaths of police officers with hundreds more injured.

"Did you know all but 21 US Representatives voted for a bill written by Nancy Pelosi that called the January 6th protestors 'insurrectionists'?" Massie tweeted, along with a link to the legislation. "I voted No and took a lot of heat for it."

POLL: Should Trump be allowed to hold office again?

Massie's objection to the bill was that it referred to supporters of then-President Donald Trump who breached the U.S. Capitol building as a "mob of insurrectionists." The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines an "insurrection" as "the act or an instance of revolting especially violently against civil or political authority or against an established government," and "the crime of inciting or engaging in such revolt." According to The Hill, Massie disagreed with the characterization of January 6 rioters as "insurrectionists" when the bill was being discussed.

"They were protesting. And I don’t approve of the way they protested, but it wasn’t an insurrection," Massie said at the time.

According to CNN, there were ultimately three medals awarded — one for the entire U.S. Capitol Police Department, one for the entire DC Metropolitan Police Department, and a third to be displayed at the Smithsonian museum naming all of the law enforcement agencies that participated in the defense of the U.S. Capitol during the insurrection.

The final vote on the bill was 406-21, with 218 "yea" votes from Democrats and 188 "yea" votes from Republicans. No Democrats voted against the bill.

READ MORE: Romney warned McConnell days before Jan. 6 that Trump could be 'instigator' of violence

Six Capitol Police officers injured due to 'illegal' pro-Palestine protest: report

At least six officers have been injured due to an "illegal" protest outside of the Democratic National Committee's headquarters, the Capitol Police announced on Wednesday.

The Capitol Police first reported that their officers were "working to keep back approximately 150 people who are illegally and violently protesting in the area of Canal Street and Ivy Street, SE."

"Officers are making arrests. All members have been evacuated from the area. Please stay away from the area," the team said.

ALSO READ: What is Trump planning if he gets a second term? Be worried. Be really worried.

After a short time, the police reported that the "large group of illegal protesters near Canal Street and Ivy Street, SE, have cleared out, but USCP officers will stay on scene out of an abundance of caution."

They later added about the pro-Palestine protest:

"Tonight 6 officers were treated for injuries – ranging from minor cuts to being pepper sprayed to being punched," the group posted on social media. "One person has been arrested for assault on an officer. We appreciate our officers who kept these illegal & violent protesters back & protected everyone in the area."


Capitol cop who fended off Jan. 6 rioters eyes congressional seat: report

A Capitol cop who fended off Jan. 6 insurrections has his eyes on a newly available congressional seat.

The eyes come in emoji form in a Thursday night tweet from Harry Dunn, who testified to the Jan. 6 select committee about the harrowing encounter he blames on former president Donald Trump.

Dunn shared a Politico article announcing Rep. John Sarbanes (D-MD) would not run for a 10th term, with the message "I see there is going to be an open Congressional seat in Maryland."

POLL: Should Trump be allowed to run for office?

Axios received confirmation from Dunn that the eyes emoji implicate a considered run.

Further proof comes in the editorial Dunn published with Time, detailing his beliefs on the state of government in a post-insurrection America.

"The America we live in today is not the America we inherited from our founders. It’s the one we built by voting, by protesting, by agitating, by demanding, by being arrested, by getting into “some good trouble, necessary trouble,” as civil rights icon, former member of Congress, and my hero, John Lewis, would say," Dunn writes.

"We got these rights by fighting, not on some faraway battlefield but right here at home."

Dunn made national headlines when he detailed his encounters with Jan. 6 rioters who called him the n-word and affirmed he required counseling for the trauma he suffered.

In the editorial, Dunn also clarifies another piece of testimony he gave.

"There was an attack carried out on January 6th, and a hitman sent them," Dunn testified in 2021. This week, he clarified, "The hitman was Donald Trump, and he needs to answer for his crime."

‘I really am sincerely sorry’: Rep. Jamaal Bowman on his alarming ‘unforced error’

WASHINGTON – After Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-NY) pulled a fire alarm in a House Office Building last month, Republicans – from then-Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) to Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) – pounced.

Some called for his expulsion, while others accused the progressive lawmaker of being an insurrectionist.

Bowman exclusively tells Raw Story he’s been kicking himself over the episode since.

“Yeah. I hate unforced errors, and this is an unforced error,” a contrite Bowman told Raw Story at the Capitol Thursday.

The second-term Bronx congressman pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor today. He could have faced time behind bars, but instead struck a plea deal and paid a fine.

“That’s done. I did all that,” Bowman said.

Besides having to pay a $1,000 fine, Bowman now has to write a letter of apology to the Capitol Police.

“Which I really am sincerely sorry to have caused that,” Bowman said. “Then three months, as long as I stay out of trouble, it will be dismissed.”

POLL: Should Trump be allowed to run for office?

Bowman has tussled with the far-right before, but he says the speed with which his Republican colleagues jumped to heavy-handed conclusions is dangerous.Just days after the weekend incident, GOP Conference Secretary Rep. Lisa McClain (R-MI) released a measure to censure Bowman, which would have stripped him of all his committee assignments.

Then Bowman’s fellow New Yorker, Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-NY), introduced a resolution to expel Bowman – a rare and little used tool since the Civil War. Greene called for him to be prosecuted the same way Jan. 6 insurrectionists were for interrupting an official congressional proceeding (which Bowman didn’t do, as the alarm was in a House Office Building, not the Capitol Building itself).

Greene found an ally in then-Speaker McCarthy. At the time, just days before he was ingloriously ousted by members of his own party, McCarthy piled on, accusing Bowman of “a new low.”

“We watched how people have been treated if they’ve done something wrong in this Capitol. It would be interesting to see how he is treated and what he was trying to obstruct when it came to the American public,” McCarthy told reporters.

All the piling on from Republicans – whether from the party’s far-right or from its leadership ranks – was pure insanity to Bowman.

“Crazy,” Bowman said. “It's crazy.”

ALSO READ: Trump ‘stiffs law enforcement officers’: Nikki Haley

Even while the hits kept coming – from Republican talking heads on cable to popular far-right conspiracy theorists – the educator and former school principal saw through what he considers a GOP smokescreen.

“That was all a distraction,” Bowman said. “It happened at the perfect time for them. It happened at the same time that Democrats were coming to save them from shutting down the government and it happened right before they were going to vacate their speaker, so, you know, this was all a convenient distraction for them.”

In the end, Bowman says his mistake wasn’t big enough to rescue the GOP from the three weeks of self-induced terrible news cycles as the party’s simmering civil war over selecting a House speaker boiled over, grinding the House to a halt.

ALSO READ: 'How many cheerleaders did he grope?’ Fans share outrage at Trump’s Iowa State game visit

The party this week settled on little-known Rep. Mike Johnson (R-LA) as the new speaker of the House.

“But at the end of the day, they can't hide behind their continued dysfunction as a party,” Bowman said. “The American people see that clearly.”

As far as the misdemeanor charge, Bowman didn’t get any special treatment, according to District of Columbia officials.

“Congressman Bowman was treated like anyone else who violates the law in the District of Columbia,” a spokesperson with the office of the DC attorney general said. “Based on the evidence presented by Capitol police, we charged the only crime that we have jurisdiction to prosecute.”

Is the episode behind Bowman now?

“I hope so. Yeah,” Bowman told Raw Story before he laughed. “As soon as you all stop asking about it!”

Fresh off Trump performance, silenced children’s choir to sing at U.S. Capitol

In May, when police interrupted the Rushingbrook Children’s Choir performance of the U.S. National Anthem inside the U.S. Capitol, a viral video of the singing shut-down thrust the small group from Greenville, S.C., into an unexpected limelight.

It also prompted new performance opportunities for the children — including singing at a recent campaign rally for former President Donald Trump.

Now, the kids are slated to reprise in Washington, D.C., next month with an all-expenses-paid trip to the Capitol, sponsored by South Carolina’s congressional delegation, Raw Story has learned from David Rasbach, director of the Rushingbrook Children's Choir.

The choir is scheduled to visit Washington, D.C., from Sept. 18 to Sept. 22 — days before the federal government could itself shut down unless lawmakers on Capitol Hill strike an elusive funding deal.

“It's been crazy, that's for sure,” Rasbach said. “Millions have seen us, and that's very unusual. We're not used to that kind of attention.”

The choir used to perform three or four times per year for audiences of 200 to 300 people, he said.

ALSO READ: Oops, I did it again: This Democratic congresswoman violated a federal law for a second time

The choir is invited back to “sing without interruption” and members of the South Carolina delegation will be paying for the group’s bus ride, accommodations and meals on its own — not out of “tax money,” Rasbach said.

“I'm very satisfied that there’s been so much support for us for what happened,” Rasbach said. “I’m very pleased with the South Carolina delegation who very graciously invited us back at their expense to finish our song. I think that’s very kind of them.”

The viral video of the children’s rendition of the “Star-Spangled Banner” being cut short was prompted by a congressional staffer, directed by U.S. Capitol police, asking Rasbach to stop the performance because “demonstrations” were not allowed in the building, Rasbach said.

Rasbach said the group of 61 children and family members received permission months ahead of time from three congressional offices — Rep. Joe Wilson (R-S.C.), Rep. William Timmons (R-S.C.) and House Speaker Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) — to perform and had been taken on a guided tour by congressional staffers that ended in the National Statuary Hall.

The Capitol Police later called the situation a “miscommunication” because they were not aware that the speaker’s office approved the performance, WYFF, a Greenville, S.C., NBC affiliate reported. But Rasbach said there was no miscommunication, and the group had the appropriate permits.

The Capitol Police website lists that marches, musical performances, demonstrations, foot races and commercial filming and photography require permits.

“I was told I was going to receive an apology. I never did,” Rasbach said. “What I saw was what the Capitol Police statement was and half of it was not true, so I’m not pleased at all with the Capitol Police.”

Wilson, Timmons and representatives for the Capitol Police did not respond to Raw Story’s request for comment at the time of publication.

The Rushingbrook Children's Choir poses in the National Statuary Hall where they performed the National Anthem in May. A video of their performance being cut short went viral. Photo courtesy of David Rasbach

Music, politicized?

Rasbach said he and his choir have never intended to make a political statement with their singing.

“This shouldn't be a political thing at all. It shouldn't be left versus right. I don't think we should make children a political football,” Rasbach said. “We didn't plan to do this. All we planned to do was innocently come up and sing and leave. We had no purpose other than to have our kids have a good experience.”

Rasbach continued, “It would be really encouraging to me if I saw our country come together on something like this and just say ‘yeah, we ought to be able to sing the national anthem,’ and just leave it at that, rather than making a political football.”

But the video of the choir’s silencing set off pitched reactions from politicians across the country, with many of the nation’s most notable and vocal Republicans taking up the choir’s cause.

“Just learned kids were interrupted while singing our National Anthem at the Capitol. Unacceptable,” McCarthy tweeted.

“Rushingbrook Children's Choir were singing the National Anthem in the Capitol and were stopped by Capitol police. They were told that ‘certain Capitol police said it might offend someone/cause issues,’” said Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) on Twitter. “The National Anthem sung by children is not offensive, it’s needed more.”

RELATED ARTICLE: We played Trump’s J6 Choir song for members of Congress — here’s how they reacted

Even while facing a Department of Justice 13-count indictment, including charges of fraud and money laundering, Rep. George Santos (R-NY) tweeted, “If this really happened, I want to ask the Capitol Police why are children expressing their First Amendment rights, especially while singing our country's national anthem, is offensive? My office will be looking into this.”

Shortly after the incident, Wilson along with his South Carolina Republican House colleagues, Reps. Timmons, Russell Fry, Nancy Mace, Ralph Norman and Jeff Duncan, introduced the Let Freedom Sing Act that would prohibit any regulations on the singing of the National Anthem on any federal property.

“In typical Washington fashion, it literally takes an act of Congress to allow children to sing the National Anthem in the People’s House. At least these kids will have no allusion that DC is a functioning place,” Mace said in a release about the legislation.

Rasbach composed a song called “Let Freedom Sing” in celebration of the legislation and to encourage people to contact their representatives in support of the proposed law.

“That's pretty exciting, and if that gets passed, it'll be a result of what happened with our choir,” Rasbach said.

The group debuted the song at Trump’s July 1 rally in Pickens, S.C., where they performed three songs and had the opportunity to meet Trump and South Carolina politicians, including Gov. Henry McMaster, Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.). Rasbach said “it was an honor to sing for that event,” which left the kids “starstruck.”

“The crowd was just amazing. They were so supportive, calling out to us saying thank you kids, and thank you for standing up. Thank you for singing and really very supportive and shouting, chanting USA, USA, very loudly. It was really kind of thrilling,” Rasbach said.

Trump, in particular, is known for his support of — and sometimes fascination with — choirs and the National Anthem.

Earlier this year, he featured himself in a song “Justice for All” that was performed by inmates facing charges for the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection.

Stage name: the “J6 Choir.”

The song briefly hit number one on iTunes music.

Trump currently faces three felony cases, including one federal indictment involving four felony counts in relation to the insurrection and Trump’s alleged effort to overturn the 2020 presidential election.

When the Rushingbrook Children’s Choir returns to the Capitol in September, they hope to be able to perform five songs like they original planned on on May — this time including “Let Freedom Sing.”