Top Stories Daily Listen Now
RawStory
RawStory

All posts tagged "joyce beatty"

Trump's DOJ torpedoes his Kennedy Center demolition threat in new court filing

President Donald Trump's Justice Department filed court papers contradicting his warning that the Kennedy Center could be demolished without his name on it.

The status report by the Department of Justice, filed in federal court on Wednesday, attributed the shuttered venue's closure to a series of safety hazards and indicated the building could reopen once those problems are fixed, The Washington Sun reported.

The DOJ's account is far more limited than the picture Trump has painted. The president has tied the landmark's future to whether his name ends up engraved on it, warning the center could be "ripped down" if he isn't recognized on the building.

A sworn declaration from Executive Director Matt Floca lays out what he described as "hazard and life-safety concerns," among them falling ceiling panels, water seeping into electrical transformers, and questions about the safety of theater equipment. According to The Sun, nothing in the declaration concludes that the center has to be torn down.

Floca said he kept the temporary closure in place for another week "to protect employees, patrons, artists, contractors, and other members of the public while the Center evaluated documented falling-object hazards and other infrastructure conditions and determined what measures would be required for safe occupancy and emergency egress," the report states.

Much of the damage described in the filing traces back to the severe storms that hit Washington earlier this month. During these storms, "a large section of ceiling plaster weighing approximately 150 pounds fell from approximately 60 feet to the floor in a public thoroughfare," according to the filing.

An inspection Tuesday by WB Engineers+Consultants found that water had apparently reached an electrical transformer vault, along with concrete fragments and other debris on the equipment. Staff also raised concerns about the opera house's lighting supports and counterweight rigging.

Floca drew a line between the emergency shutdown and the board's longer-term closure plan. The filing notes that temporary safeguards won't fix the building's underlying deterioration or settle how extensive or lengthy a broader renovation would be.

The center's board, stacked with Trump appointees, voted last week to close the venue for $250 million in renovations. Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-OH), who sits on the board as an ex officio member, is challenging the closure. She argues it runs afoul of an existing order from U.S. District Judge Christopher R. Cooper and may be cover for a permanent move.

After the board's vote, Trump declared the renovations dead unless a court ruled in his favor.

"The Reconstruction and the Renovation of The Kennedy Center will not take place," he wrote on Truth Social.

The filing sets no reopening date. Beatty's attorneys did not immediately respond to The Sun's requests for comment.

Kennedy Center shutdown covering up bigger mess triggered by Trump: lawyer

The push to shut down the Kennedy Center is a cover story meant to hide financial mismanagement tied to President Donald Trump, an attorney said.

In a Friday episode of Bulwark Takes, Nathaniel Zelinsky argued that Trump's demanded renaming and shutdown are a tell for a greater problem the president caused. Zelinsky is the lead counsel for Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-OH) in her legal fight over the future of the Kennedy Center.

"We think that the real reason they need to shut down or want to shut down is to hide the financial mismanagement that is the direct result of his name going on the Kennedy Center," Zelinsky said. "So we think these two things, the renaming and the shutdown, are intimately linked."

The claim now has a deadline attached. This week, Judge Christopher "Casey" Cooper granted Beatty's team expedited discovery into the shutdown and any demolition plans, meaning the internal records behind the closure are set to become evidence.

Cooper also rejected Trump's latest workaround for putting his name on the building, which would have branded it as "endowed by Donald Trump" or "restored and renovated by Donald Trump." The judge, Zelinsky said, called it "linguistic gymnastics" that "doesn't get around his opinion and it doesn't get around the law."

The fight escalated after Trump was photographed aboard Air Force One studying a poster reading "Kennedy Center demolished," and after he told pool reporters, "If my name doesn't go up there, we might have to demolish this thing."

Cooper responded by ordering 30 days' notice before any demolition or change in the project's scope.

"It means that at least as a legal matter, Donald Trump can't do what he did to the East Wing," Zelinsky said. "He can't just show up, wreck the thing, and move on."

Zelinsky described Trump as "just grotesquely fixated on putting his name on a memorial to a slain president who gave the last full measure of devotion in the line of duty."

Trump brutally fact-checked over false claims about 'chaotic' Kennedy Center closure

Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-OH) gave a blistering fact-check of President Donald Trump and his claims about the closure of the Kennedy Center.

On Tuesday night, Beatty appeared for an interview with anchor Kaitlan Collins, where she described the "chaotic" argument they had during a Kennedy Center board meeting. Beatty is an ex officio member of the board and has been a prominent opponent of Trump's effort to rename and close it, as she's filed multiple lawsuits against him.

"When you think about what he did, not only during the board meeting, but what he then put out after the board meeting, that many people are reporting, it's not true," Beatty explained. She began refuting statements that Trump made about the Kennedy Center board and what he said on Truth Social.

Trump "stated that we voted to close down the Kennedy Center today," but "that was not what the vote was," Beatty explained.

"While I did not support the vote, the others who voted did not vote for the language that he is putting up on Truth Social," Beatty continued. "Nor did we hear anything about him holding $17 million he was going to put in there or hold it again unlawfully."

Beatty then clarified what's happening with the Kennedy Center and reiterated her position against Trump, saying, "If he did not get his name on the Kennedy Center board, the Kennedy Center is not going to close down at this time."

She noted that because of her lawsuit and a decision by a federal judge, Trump "would be in contempt of court" if he tried to close it down to put his name on it.

"The Department of Justice is looking into it. It is open at this time," Beatty said. "There were rumors that he told everyone to evacuate the building, and it was being closed. Then it was reported that it was a false fire alarm, so people had to leave...this is what we've been dealing with with Donald Trump."

'Shocking' Trump DOJ moves during Kennedy Center hearing flagged by lawyer

A lawyer involved in the hearings over President Donald Trump's effort to rename the Kennedy Center flagged a shocking moment by the Justice Department.

During a Thursday appearance on CNN, Nathaniel Zelinsky said it was "shocking" that DOJ lawyers insisted on sticking to a September deadline that they set themselves. Zelinsky is part of the legal counsel for Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-OH), an ex officio member of the Kennedy Center board who is challenging the renaming.

The DOJ has said that it will refrain from putting Trump's name back on the Kennedy Center until September 8, but has been unclear about why. Zelinsky noted that Judge Christopher Cooper "was clear that he might issue a temporary restraining order to buy himself a little more time" to consider the case, but the DOJ stuck to its deadline, which is about two weeks away.

"What's shocking here is that the Department of Justice has said that they're going to stick by this artificial September deadline to put the name back on the Kennedy Center," Zelinsky said. "There's no reason to. September 8 is a made-up date."

The DOJ insisted that it has to put Trump's name back on the Kennedy Center by then, but the judge is asking the department, "Please, can you wait a little bit?" Zelinsky recounted. "And they said, 'No.'"

Zelinsky said he expects Cooper to respond by issuing an emergency order to force the DOJ to wait and give himself a little more time. Zelinsky also responded to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, whose wife is a trustee of the board, who said on Thursday that Trump needs to be "enticed" to fund renovations to the center.

"That's not what the law is," Zelinsky said. "The law is very clear. This is a memorial to John F. Kennedy. You can't sell a piece off. It can't be the Tesla Plaza. It can't be the Koch Memorial. It's the Kennedy Center, and so it doesn't matter if that's what the president wants to do."

Trump lawyers quietly conceded admin has 'irrevocably damaged' Kennedy Center

Lawyers for President Donald Trump didn't dispute that adding his name to the Kennedy Center may have "irrevocably damaged" its historic marble facade.

The tacit concession surfaced in a Wednesday court filing from Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-OH), an ex officio member of the Kennedy Center's board of trustees. Beatty has been fighting the administration's renewed push to emblazon Trump's name on the building.

Beatty's attorneys argued in the filing that the administration's silence was itself an admission.

"Tellingly, Defendants do not dispute that their prior efforts to emblazon the building with President Trump's name may have irrevocably damaged the center's historic marble facade," Beatty's lawyers wrote in the motion, which urged an emergency injunction.

The filing accuses the administration of defying a federal judge who ruled in May that the center's public spaces can honor only President John F. Kennedy. The court was blunt about who controls the name, the filing noted.

"Congress gave the Kennedy Center its name, and only Congress can change it," the judge wrote in the decision, which the filing quoted.

Despite the ruling, the Trump-allied board voted on August 13 to inscribe "Renovated and Restored by President Donald J. Trump" on the facade and rename the grounds "President Donald J. Trump Plaza."

Justice Department lawyers have since warned that the changes are needed to avoid more drastic steps, including demolishing the center and replacing it with an outdoor amphitheater. Beatty's team flagged the warning as a threat.

"In plain English, Defendants have not-so-subtly said: 'What a nice Kennedy Center you have here. What a shame should something happen to it,'" Beatty's lawyers wrote. "This is a breathtaking assault on the rule of law. It is delusional. And it must stop."

Beatty also argued that Trump's own takeover, not the absence of his name, sent ticket sales and donations into a tailspin. Her filing pointed to a recent Washington Post report that the center's finances cratered after the name change even as leaders publicly touted a turnaround.

Latest Trump-backed Kennedy Center renaming bid triggers emergency hearing: report

A federal judge has set an emergency hearing after the Kennedy Center's board voted to put Trump's name back up.

The hearing was set for Thursday as Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-OH) challenges the Trump team's plan to re-add his name to the facade and close the center for two years, according to a post on X by journalist Scott MacFarlane.

Beatty, an ex officio member of the center's board, filed an emergency motion last week to stop the move, NPR reported. Beatty is asking U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper to block the board from re-inscribing the president's name on the front portico, this time twice, and from renaming the grounds "President Donald J. Trump Plaza," according to the filing.

Her motion also targets the board's August 13 vote to shutter the venue for two years for renovations, which critics fear masks a broader effort to remake the complex in Trump's image, according to The Associated Press.

"It's deja vu all over again," Beatty's lawyers wrote in the filing. They argued that only Congress can rename an institution dedicated as a living memorial to Kennedy in 1964.

Cooper, an Obama appointee, made a similar ruling in the long-running battle over Trump's efforts to rename the Kennedy Center. In May, he ruled that the board lacked the authority to rename the center and ordered Trump's name stripped from the facade. Cooper called the earlier closure vote "ill-informed and seemingly preordained," NBC News reported. Trump's name came down in June, though a tarp has covered the portico since June 13, Forbes reported.

The board has said it won't add Trump's name back before September 8, NPR reported. Beatty's team called that an "arbitrary deadline" and a manufactured emergency. Cooper gave the board until Monday to respond, according to Forbes.

"The board's repeated efforts to break the law are a breathtaking act of defiance," Beatty said.

Dem rep tries to stop Kennedy Center closure and outlines 'narrow exceptions' for remodel

A Democratic Party representative has waded in to prevent major remodeling action at the Kennedy Center, challenging President Donald Trump's administration on the laws around the building.

Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-OH) has asked a federal judge to outline the specifics of what can and cannot be changed in the two-year remodeling plan. A motion filed Wednesday challenged the purpose of the shutdown, which is set to begin later this year as the Trump administration makes a series of sweeping changes to the interior and exterior of the building.

Beatty's lawyers, Norm Eisen and Nathaniel Zelinsky, wrote to the federal judge arguing that plans for the Kennedy Center remodeling must be made clear, The Hill reported.

"There is no clearer or more significant breach of fiduciary duty than the Board flouting the central purpose of the institution it is charged with protecting and which Congress enshrined into law: to maintain the Center as a memorial to John F. Kennedy — and to no one else," Beatty wrote.

Beatty has previously taken action against the Trump administration on the Kennedy Center, suing the board of the arts venue. A newly filed motion against the Kennedy Center board uses the wording of the statute that established the Kennedy Center as grounds to investigate what the Trump team has planned for the building.

The 1964 legislation for the building reads, "The Board shall construct…a building to be designated as the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts." Eisen and Zelinsky argue the "designated" detail means Kennedy's name alone should be featured.

The pair also argued that "no additional memorials or plaques in the nature of memorials shall be designated or installed" at the center's public areas, unless fitting into one of three exceptions.

If the memorial is acknowledging a gift from a foreign nation, a plaque on a theater chair or box acknowledging a gift, or any inscription inside the center, it can be validated.

"None of these narrow exceptions permit the trustees to add President Trump’s name to the Center’s façade — above President Kennedy’s name — and to rebrand the Center as the ‘Trump Kennedy Center," Eisen and Zelinsky added.

'Acting like criminals!' Lawmaker fumes as Trump flouts law with major rebrand

Kennedy Center board member and Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-OH) had some words Thursday for President Donald Trump and his administration over the venue's upcoming rebrand.

Beatty told CNN anchor Jake Tapper that the vote to rename the venue after President Donald Trump was "not unanimous" despite the Trump White House's claims to the contrary and called out the move.

"They have no regard for the rule of law. They are acting as what criminals do. And it's criminal that they are doing this," Beatty said.

"I served with Joe Kennedy when I first went on the board. He's absolutely right. They cannot independently, as a handful of self-appointed people who giggled and laughed, the whole board meeting was a mockery of professional boards," Beatty added.

She described the situation while the vote unfolded.

"There were 10 or 15 minutes where we could hear people laughing and singing jingle bells because they didn't know how to even operate the equipment," Beatty said. "The board meeting was held in someone's home, the home of the Wynns that were hosting it. I don't know if they were in their library, the kitchen, or where they were. Typically on a Zoom, you can see the table where the board members are. None of this happened. It was a farce. Just as most of the things that they have been doing, it was a dog and pony show."

Beatty was referring to Steve Wynn, the Las Vegas hotel and casino owner, and his wife Andrea Hissom, who sit on the board and were appointed by Trump.

Why big-time politicians are surrendering gobs of campaign cash to an unlikely source

More than 30 federal political candidates and party committees have together surrendered at least $160,000 worth of donor dollars to the U.S. Marshals Service in recent weeks, according to a Raw Story analysis of federal campaign records.

It’s an all-but-unprecedented relinquishing of precious campaign cash to a government agency best known for hunting down suspected criminals, and even veteran election officials say they’ve never seen anything quite like it in U.S. politics.

But this isn’t any routine situation: Most of these “disgorgements” stem from contributions made by executives of bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange FTX, including former CEO Sam Bankman-Fried, Raw Story’s analysis indicates. And the Department of Justice is urging campaigns to give the money up.

“Based on our office's investigation, we have cause to believe these donations represent the proceeds of Bankman-Fried's crimes and accordingly are forfeitable under applicable provisions of the federal asset forfeiture statutes,” said a letter sent by the Department of Justice to a member of Congress’ campaign committee, which in turn shared its contents with Raw Story.

The letter continued, “It is the intent of this office to request any funds forfeited be made available to compensate the victims of Bankman-Fried's crimes pursuant to the Department of Justice's restoration and/or remission regulations."

Bankman-Fried faces 13 charges in federal court, including fraud, breaking campaign finance laws and violating the Foreign Corrupt Business Practices Act with an alleged $40 million bribe to Chinese authorities. The FBI on Thursday reportedly searched the home of FTX executive Ryan Salame, a frequent political donor. Salame has not been charged with a crime.

The largest amount sent to the U.S. Marshals came from the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, which received $36,500 from Nishad Singh, FTX’s former director of engineering, who pleaded guilty in February to six conspiracy charges. The DSCC did not respond to Raw Story’s request for comment.

The Republican National Committee received $25,000 from Salame, according to the FEC filing. The RNC declined to comment.

RELATED ARTICLE: Beto O’Rourke returned $1 million check from FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried

Raw Story’s review of the FEC filings indicated that of the political committees to unload money to the Marshals Service, Salame contributed to 15, Bankman-Fried to six and Singh to five.

It is highly unusual for the Marshals Service to involve itself in electoral politics generally, and it almost never collects money from political campaigns. Federal Election Commission records show it’s happened once during the past decade prior to the flurry of disgorgements during recent weeks. The Marshals Service does, however, list “seizing assets gained by illegal means and providing for the custody, management, and disposal of forfeited assets” among its responsibilities.

Campaigns typically send unwanted donor cash — particularly money from contributors who find themselves in legal jeopardy or public disrepute — to the U.S. Treasury, which generally absorbs it into the nation’s general fund.

Sending money to the Marshals Service is “a way for these political committees to resolve the situation, and then whatever they do with Sam Bankman-Fried, that's a whole other issue,” said Michael Toner, a partner at Wiley Rein and former Republican FEC chairman who served on the commission from 2002 to 2007. “It may be that the authorities have preferred the disgorgements go to the U.S. Marshals Service because obviously that's an arm of the federal government, and it would accomplish the same purpose as a disgorgement" to the U.S. Treasury.

“It appears this is related to the FTX case, and all inquiries are being referred to the USAO in the Southern District of New York,” Dave Oney, a spokesman for the Marshals Service, told Raw Story via email.

The Department of Justice and the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of New York did not respond to Raw Story’s requests for comment.

Emphasizing that she was speculating, Ann Ravel, a Democrat and former FEC chairwoman who served from 2013 to 2017, said, “I've never seen anything like this, and maybe they think because they can't rely on [campaign] people doing what they're supposed to do, that they need more active campaign finance enforcers.”

Raw Story contacted each political committee that disgorged money to the Marshals Service between January, when the phenomenon first began, and late March, when most disgorgements took place. Most committees did not respond to messages.

But the campaign of Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) indicated that Crenshaw didn’t need a push to return the $2,900 Salame contributed to Crenshaw for Congress on Oct. 10, 2022.

“Obviously the campaign didn’t know at the time that FTX was engaged in criminal activity,” said Sue Walden, Crenshaw for Congress’ political director, in a statement to Raw Story. “We were happy to oblige the Justice Department’s request.”

Among the political contributions that federal political committees have sent the U.S. Marshals:

Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee — $36,500

Republican National Committee — $25,000

Former Republican Sen. Ben Sasse — $5,800

Rep. Mike Simpson (R-ID) — $5,800

Former Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-NY) Campaign Fund — $5,800

Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-NH) — $5,800

Sen. John Boozman (R-AR) — $5,800

Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) — $5,800

Rep. Eli Crane (R-AZ) — $2,900

Rep. Larry Bucshon (R-IN) — $2,900

Rep. Chuck Edwards (R-NC) — $2,900

Rep. Alex Mooney (R-WV) — $2,900

Rep. Julia Letlow (R-LA) — $2,900

Rep. Greg Casar (D-TX) — $2,900

Rep. Salud Carbajal (D-CA) — $2,900

Rep. Jeff Duncan (R-SC) — $2,900

Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) — $2,900

Rep. Morgan Griffith (R-VA) — $2,900

Rep. Maxwell Alejandro Frost (D-FL) — $2,900

Rep. Bill Johnson (R-OH) — $2,900

Rep. John Moolenaar (R-MI) — $2,900

Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-OH) — $2,900

Rep. Kay Granger (R-TX) — $2,900

Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) Presidential Exploratory Committee — $2,900

Rep. Gary Palmer (R-AL) — $2,900

Rep. Buddy Carter (R-GA) — $2,900

Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL) — $2,900

Rep. Kathy Castor (D-FL) — $2,900

Rep. Sean Casten (D-IL) — $2,700

Athena Pac (Democratic Rep. Kathy Castor of Florida) — $2,500

Axne PAC (Democratic Rep. Cynthia Axne of Iowa) — $1,618