All posts tagged "kash patel"

'Cannot stand him': Insiders claim top Trump officials have turned on Kash Patel

White House insiders revealed that Republicans are turning on FBI Director Kash Patel, claiming he has lost the support of top officials — even as President Donald Trump continues to publicly back him, according to a Fox News report.

"The White House, [Attorney General Pam] Bondi, [Deputy Attorney General Todd] Blanche, they have no confidence in Kash," a source with knowledge of ongoing personnel discussions told Fox News. "Pam in particular cannot stand him. Blanche either," they said.

Former Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey is set to be sworn into a "new power-sharing role" with deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino Monday, Fox reported. Bailey was onceTrump’s top pick to lead the FBI.

"Any suggestion that I was brought in to replace anyone in leadership at the FBI or spin my appointment into a sign of division, is simply false - I am honored to serve the FBI and Department of Justice as we work together to keep our nation safe," Bailey said in a statement to the network.

Bondi and Blanche have denied that they want to remove Patel, who has been criticized for his handling of the Charlie Kirk assassination investigation last week.

With scrutiny increasing on an investigation that appears to be marked by blunders, the FBI director and Bongino both pointed the finger at their subordinates, with Patel calling what transpired a “Mickey Mouse operation” when he was not swearing at them.

"Total amateur hour," a federal official told Fox.

Utah Gov. Spencer Cox took the lead on Friday during a press conference announcing suspect 22-year-old Tyler Robinson was in custody. One source told Fox that "letting Kash talk much could f--- up the prosecution."

As criticism over the handling of the Kirk killing continues, a larger concern is looming. Three former high-ranking FBI officials filed a lawsuit on the same day Kirk was shot. They accuse Patel, Bondi and their agencies of unlawfully firing them as "part of a political purge" directed by the DOJ and the White House. Patel had promised against this during his Senate confirmation hearings.

Patel allegedly wielded authority that belongs solely to the president, Fox reported, citing Article II of the Constitution in the dismissal letters he signed. This misstep could create a legal minefield for the FBI, DOJ and Executive Office of the President, according to sources who are familiar with the litigation.

"Either way, it’s bad: Kash cannot exercise the powers of the president, and the president can’t fire these officials," an unnamed source with knowledge of the lawsuit told Fox.

'Didn't meet the moment': Internet blasts Kash Patel over handling of Kirk investigation

FBI Director Kash Patel 's leadership came under question this week during the investigation of right-wing influencer Charlie Kirk's assassination.

Authorities announced the arrest Friday of 22-year-old Tyler Robinson in the fatal shooting of the conservative activist at Utah Valley University, but Patel's handling of the investigation came under fire after he incorrectly asserted the shooter had been captured shortly after the slaying, forcing a swift retraction, and current and former FBI agents criticized his leadership.

“It was amateur hour,” said Sen. Dick Durbin, the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee. “He was doing a running commentary. Historically, the FBI keeps its mouth closed until it believes it’s the right time and the right message.”

Robinson was arrested after his father notified the family's pastor, who then alerted law enforcement, and many social media users said the case was cracked more in spite of Patel's leadership than because of it.

"Kash Patel Awards Himself FBI Medal of Valor For Heroically Being Told About The Alleged Shooter Turning Himself In," posted writer A.G. Pasquella.

"'FBI Director Kash Patel did not disclose for hours that Charlie Kirk’s suspected killer had been arrested so that President Donald Trump could make the announcement on television," said Bluesky user "Murdered by Bluesky," linking to a Daily Beast report. "It is hard to imagine a more incompetent, corrupt FBI leader and that's saying a lot given the FBI's tenure."

"The FBI under Kash Patel was utterly incompetent this week, and the only thing that ultimately saved their asses was a father having enough integrity to turn his son into the authorities," opined writer Charlotte Clymer.

"Kash Patel has the look of a guy who just Googled 'how to FBI' five minutes before the press conference," noted Bluesky user Sundae Gurl.

"Patel saying 'see you in Valhalla' to someone who very much identified as a Christian is a perfect example of how dumb everything is right now," sighed journalist Steve Mullis.

"Spoiler: the police did not, in fact, 'get him,' his dad turned him in and all Kash Patel’s FBI did was repeatedly release false information," added writer Jill Filipovic.

"Kash Patel claiming credit for solving an investigation where they got the wrong suspects twice & had to beg public for help which led his own father turning him in does not make a historic win for FBI," said comedian Noel Casler. "All I saw from Kash was that little cross-eyed mf--- peacocking at pressers."

"The FBI agents I've met take their jobs really seriously," posted reporter Billy Binion. "I'd like to think Kash Patel means well, but I can't imagine how it must feel to have to answer to him right now. He...did not meet the moment."

"I'm grateful that Utah authorities have captured the suspect in the Charlie Kirk assassination, and think it is time for Republicans to assess whether Kash Patel is the right man to run the FBI," added conservative activist Christopher Rufo. "He performed terribly in the last few days, and it's not clear whether he has the operational expertise to investigate, infiltrate, and disrupt the violent movements — of whatever ideology — that threaten the peace in the United States."

'Performed terribly': Influential anti-DEI advocate urges Patel firing despite Kirk arrest

Despite the arrest of the young man who allegedly shot far-right conservative Charlie Kirk, an influential advocate for the government dismantling diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies claimed FBI Director Kash Patel still does not appear to be up to the job.

In a post on X, Chris Rufo, a political analyst and New College of Florida board member appointed by Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-FL), claimed he has been talking to other conservatives who agree Patel has to go.

He wrote, “I'm grateful that Utah authorities have captured the suspect in the Charlie Kirk assassination, and think it is time for Republicans to assess whether Kash Patel is the right man to run the FBI. He performed terribly in the last few days, and it's not clear whether he has the operational expertise to investigate, infiltrate, and disrupt the violent movements—of whatever ideology—that threaten the peace in the United States.”

He then suggested, “There are two ways forward. First, we enter a spiral of violence, which would be a catastrophe for the country. Second, federal law enforcement makes a credible plan to restore the civil order, initiates a campaign to disrupt domestic terror networks in all fifty states, and sets them in motion with the goal of preventing further bloodshed, all of which can and must be done in a principled, legal, nonpartisan manner.”

According to the conservative analyst, “We would be wise to take a moment and ask whether Kash Patel has what it takes to get this done. I've been on the phone the last few days with many conservative leaders, all of whom wholeheartedly support the Trump Administration and none of whom are confident that the current structure of the FBI is up to this task.”

Rufo, it should be noted, successfully led the charge to force Harvard University president Claudine Gay, a Black woman, to resign, and was partly responsible for falsely accusing African migrants of eating cats in Dayton, Ohio, which was taken up by Donald Trump and JD Vance despite no evidence.

'Cringiest': FBI Director Kash Patel's 'weird' farewell to Charlie Kirk sparks confusion

FBI Director Kash Patel issued right-wing influencer Charlie Kirk a farewell Friday during a press conference on the apprehension of Kirk’s suspected killer, though his choice of words has sparked confusion online.

“To my friend Charlie Kirk: rest now brother, we have the watch, and I’ll see you in Valhalla,” Patel said, referencing the utopian realm of Valhalla from Norse mythology.

Given that Patel is Hindu, and Kirk, an evangelical Christian, the reference to an afterlife rooted in Norse mythology drew criticism online, many of whom questioned why it was that Patel chose to invoke a pagan warrior afterlife rather than one aligned with either of the two’s religious faiths.

“Why in the world did Kash Patel mention Valhalla?” wrote journalist Zaid Jilani on X, author of “The American Saga” newsletter, to his more than 148,000 followers. “What kind of Marvel Cinematic Universe government do we have right now?”

Patel’s comments were made following a press conference in Utah where officials fielded questions from the press on Kirk’s suspected killer, later identified as 22-year-old Utah resident Tyler Robinson. Robinson was turned in to authorities by his father, Trump suggested and media outlets have corroborated.

And while Kirk’s killing has drawn bi-partisan condemnation, Patel’s choice of words in bidding Kirk farewell came off to many of those online as “weird.”

“Considering Kirk’s devout Christianity, saying you’ll see him in the pagan afterlife is weird,” wrote Andrew Tollemache on X, a self-described resident of Texas who shares content on stock market activity. “I’ll chalk it up [to] Patel being a poser tough guy.”

Multiple X users called Patel’s remarks the “cringiest thing” they’ve heard, including Jim Stewartson, journalist and co-host of the “Radicalized Podcast,” to his more than 133,000 followers.

“Neither of them believe in Valhalla by the way,” wrote Heidi Moore on X, a journalist formerly with the Wall Street Journal and the Guardian who now writes for their own Substack. “Our entire government is these bumbling dips---- pretending they're old Norse warriors.”

'Mickey Mouse operation': Furious Kash Patel reamed aides in profanity-filled meeting

Under pressure from the White House and from the MAGA base, a furious Kash Patel lashed out at his aides on Thursday over the slow pace of the Charlie Kirk murder investigation during a tense meeting at FBI headquarters, the New York Times is reporting.

With scrutiny increasing on an investigation that appears to be spinning its wheels and has been hamstrung by blunders, the FBI director and his deputy Dan Bongino, are both pointing the finger at their subordinates, with Patel calling what has transpired a “Mickey Mouse operation” when he was not swearing at them.

According to the Times’ Glenn Thrush, Devlin Barrett and Adam Goldman, Patel and Bongino “... made it clear they were under intense pressure to catch the killer of Mr. Kirk. They expressed themselves with such fierce urgency that, in the view of some participants, it hinted at another motive: to prove they were up to the task.”

Patel is already being second-guessed after taking to X and boasting about suspects in the murder of the far-right activist who have been taken into custody, only to have to swiftly walk those back sometimes within an hour.

Noting that Patel and Bongino hopped on a plane and flew to the scene of the crime on Thursday, with Patel appearing at a delayed press conference, the Times is reporting that Patel was particularly incensed “that agents in Salt Lake City waited nearly 12 hours to show him a photo of the suspected killer, according to three people familiar on the exchange.”

“Whether Mr. Patel can overcome his embarrassing early stumble in posts online about the Kirk investigation remains to be seen,” the Times is reporting before adding, “It was highly unusual for the director of the F.B.I., known for its button-down messaging and a longstanding reluctance to compromise investigations by freely sharing information with the public.”

You can read more here.

'An embarrassment in the annals of the FBI': Insiders bash Patel over Charlie Kirk probe

FBI insiders and former officials are watching in horror as current FBI Director Kash Patel has taken the front and center position heading up the investigation into the murder of far-right conservative Charlie Kirk.

That is according to MSNBC’s Ken Dilainian who stated that what has transpired since the shooting at a Utah college is being regarded as an “embarrassment,” with all signs pointing to the Donald Trump appointee.

Speaking with MSNBC host Anna Cabrera, Dilainian said Patel will long be remembered for his fumbling on social media –– and not in a good way.

At issue were tweets sent out by the director claiming that suspects had been taken into custody, only for the story to change within hours.

As the manhunt for the shooter continued, the MSNBC journalist explained, “Anna, the current and former FBI officials I've been talking to about this episode last night are frankly calling it an embarrassment and they're saying this should never happen.”

“To answer your question, the FBI does appear to have changed the way it's communicated in the sense that the FBI director is no longer freelance-tweeting” he elaborated. “He is essentially posting the official statements that appear to be carefully vetted.joint statements between the FBI and the Utah Department of Public Safety. and they're sort of carefully putting out exactly what they know and trying not to go beyond that.”

“But look,” he observed. “You know, Kash Patel inexplicably essentially said that they had the guy and then had to retract that and has not explained, nor has the FBI explained how that mistake happened. That was an embarrassment in the annals of the FBI, and it's not something that ever should happen.”

- YouTube youtu.be

Fired FBI agents say Kash Patel claimed they could not have voted for Kamala Harris: suit

A new lawsuit filed by three fired FBI agents alleges that FBI Director Kash Patel told at least one of them that passing vetting by President Donald Trump’s transition team would be easy—so long as he hadn’t voted for Vice President Kamala Harris, among other criteria.

Legal experts circulated the suit online, identifying the plaintiffs as Brian Driscoll, former acting FBI director; Steve Jensen, former assistant director in charge of the Washington, D.C. field office; and Spencer Evans, former special agent in charge of the Las Vegas field office.

MSNBC reported Wednesday that Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi carried out the firings under orders from the White House and Justice Department. According to the lawsuit, Patel told at least one agent, “his ability to keep his own job depended on the removal of agents who worked on cases involving the President,” and stated there was nothing he or Driscoll could do to prevent the firings.

Reporters Ken Dilanian and Carol Leonnig note that the 69-page complaint claims the men were the targets of “politically motivated retribution” and are seeking to vindicate their constitutional and legal rights. If their allegations are true, it would reveal FBI leadership “consumed by the whims of a Trump White House that targeted employees solely for political reasons.”

The suit further asserts that Patel told FBI employees they could be fired regardless of retirement or eligibility status. Driscoll recounts being told point-blank that “the FBI tried to put the president in jail and he hasn’t forgotten it.”

Even though agents have no say in which cases they are assigned, the lawsuit claims Trump demanded that anyone connected to investigations involving him be removed.

Firing the agents without cause violates internal FBI protocols and federal law, and the filing notes that Patel was fully aware of this, even acknowledging at one point that he knew he could be sued.

Read the full filing here.

Kash Patel's girlfriend sues for defamation over being called 'honeypot Mossad agent'

FBI Director Kash Patel's girlfriend is suing a former agent who is claiming whistleblower protections after he alleged she was a spy and part of a "honeypot" operation.

CNBC reported Friday that Alexis Wilkins filed a lawsuit against Kyle Seraphin, claiming he "has maliciously lied" about her by “falsely asserting that she—an American-born country singer—is an agent of a foreign government, assigned to manipulate and compromise the Director of the FBI,” the lawsuit alleges.

Seraphin, a conservative podcaster, refers to himself as a "recovering FBI agent," the report noted. Wilkins claims that he is using the accusations against her as "self-enriching clickbait."

Seraphin, in response, claimed on his show that he never directly accused Wilkins of being a spy, adding that similar rumors have circulated widely online. However, the lawsuit contends that, as a former counterintelligence FBI agent, Seraphin’s comments carry serious weight and can’t be dismissed as exaggeration or internet gossip. Indeed, Seraphin never says Wilkins' name when speaking about it.

Through her attorney, Wilkins flatly denies any ties to Israel, intelligence agencies, or covert activity.

The complaint continues, noting, “Ms. Wilkins is not even Jewish, let alone Israeli, and has never set foot in Israel,” calling Seraphin’s claims both baseless and insulting.

The suit also emphasizes that labeling her a “honeypot” essentially accuses her of being an agent of a foreign government attempting to undermine U.S. national security and law enforcement, which amounts to an accusation of treason.

Patel “has had his own little ‘honeypot’ issue that’s been going on of late, so we’re just going to acknowledge it real publicly,” Seraphin said on the podcast episode cited in the lawsuit.

“He’s got a girlfriend that is half his age, who is apparently is both a country music singer, a political commentator on Rumble, a friend of John Rich through [FBI deputy Director Dan] Bongino, who also now owns a big chunk of Rumble, and she’s also a former Mossad agent in what is like the equivalent of their NSA," he continued.

“But I’m sure that’s totally because, like, she’s really looking for like a cross-eyed, you know, kind of thickish built, super cool bro who’s almost 50 years old who’s Indian in America,” Seraphin said, his voice dripping with sarcasm.

“Like it has nothing to do with the fact that uh we’re really close to the Trump administration,” he added. “Anyway, I’m sure that’s totally just like love. That’s what real love looks like.”

The suit asks for $5 million in damages.

Read the full report here.

This timeline of Trump's Epstein cover-up reveals so much

Drip, drip, drip…

For months, Donald Trump has tried to divert public attention from the Jeffrey Epstein-Ghislaine Maxwell files. But he can’t shake the story, and it keeps getting worse.

Reversal

Trump campaigned on the promise to release all of the files relating to Epstein’s sex trafficking in minors. To supercharge his MAGA base, he fueled conspiracy theories that the files contained something sinister involving prominent Democrats.

February 2025: Trump’s Attorney General, Pam Bondi, told a Fox News interviewer that Epstein’s client list was sitting on her desk, awaiting her review before its release.

May: Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche informed Trump that his name appeared in the Epstein files, the New York Times later reported.

July 7: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Kash Patel — who pushed conspiracy theories about the files during Trump’s campaign — issued a two-page memo stating that there was no Epstein client list and that the Justice Department would not release any additional materials relating to the matter.

July 16: Assistant US Attorney for the Southern District of New York Maurene Comey was fired. Comey was a lead prosecutor in the investigation and prosecution of Epstein and his coconspirator, Maxwell. She was also the daughter of former FBI Director James Comey and chief of the Violent and Organized Crime Unit. The memo gave no reason for Comey’s abrupt termination.

July 17: The Wall Street Journal published Trump’s alleged birthday note to Epstein that included his sketch of a naked woman.

Blowback

Trump’s MAGA base erupted in anger over his refusal to release the Epstein files. Trying to appease his followers, Trump directed Bondi to ask that the courts release grand jury transcripts. This was disingenuous because: 1) the courts were not likely to release the material; and 2) even if they did, the transcripts would constitute a small fraction of the Epstein-Maxwell files.

July 23: A Florida judge denied Bondi’s motion to release the files relating to Epstein investigations in 2005 and 2007 that resulted in a non-prosecution agreement. Trump’s first-term Secretary of Labor, Alex Acosta, negotiated the agreement with Epstein’s high-powered lawyers while serving as US attorney for the Southern District of Florida during George W. Bush’s presidency.

Blunder

July 24: Deputy Attorney General (and former Trump attorney) Todd Blanche flew to Tallahassee and met with Maxwell for two days — an unprecedented visit for a No. 2 official in the Justice Department. Maxwell is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking.

July 31: Contrary to prison assignment policies for sex offenders, the Justice Department’s Bureau of Prisons transferred Maxwell from a Tallahassee prison to a “Club Fed” camp in Texas.

Boomerang

August 11: A federal judge in New York denied Bondi’s motion to unseal Maxwell’s grand jury files. The court observed that anyone “who reviewed these materials expecting, based on the Government’s representations, to learn new information about Epstein’s and Maxwell’s crimes and the investigation into them, would come away feeling disappointed and misled. There is no ‘there’ there.”

The entire exercise was a farce — another Trump con job:

The one colorable argument under that doctrine for unsealing in this case, in fact, is that doing so would expose as disingenuous the Government’s public explanations for moving to unseal. A member of the public, appreciating that the Maxwell grand jury materials do not contribute anything to public knowledge, might conclude that the Government’s motion for their unsealing was aimed not at “transparency” but at diversion — aimed not at full disclosure but at the illusion of such.

August 20: A different federal judge in New York blasted Bondi’s motion to unseal the grand jury transcripts. Describing the “trove” of materials that the Justice Department had assembled but withheld from the public, the court observed:

The Government’s 100,000 pages of Epstein files and materials dwarf the 70-odd pages of Epstein grand jury materials.

Trump’s directive that Bondi seek the release of the grand jury materials was always a ruse. As the court continued:

The Government is the logical party to make comprehensive disclosure to the public of the Epstein files. By comparison, the instant grand jury motion appears to be a “diversion” from the breadth and scope of the Epstein files in the Government’s possession.

The court specifically called out Trump’s about-face on releasing the files:

In February 2025, the Government, as noted, was prepared to release the “Epstein Files” to the public. See DOJ Press Release. But then, on July 6, 2025, the Government announced that it would not make the files available to the public.

And the judge concluded: “The information contained in the Epstein grand jury transcripts pales in comparison to the Epstein investigation and materials in the hands of the Department of Justice.”

New scam

On August 5, several Republicans voted with Democrats on the House Oversight Committee to force chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) to subpoena the Justice Department for Epstein-Maxwell materials. Comer also issued subpoenas to former Attorneys General William Barr, Merrick Garland, Jeff Sessions, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder, and Alberto Gonzales; former FBI Director James Comey; former special counsel and FBI Director Robert Mueller III; former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton; and former President Bill Clinton.

That’s superficially impressive, but purely performative. Notably missing are the frontline prosecutors and investigators who actually know something meaningful about the Epstein-Maxwell cases.

One is Maurene Comey.

August 22: The FBI’s surprise search of former National Security Advisor John Bolton’s home and office dominated the media. The Justice Department also released a transcript of Blanche’s interview with Maxwell during which she asserted that no one connected with Epstein’s alleged crimes had done anything wrong — including her and, of course, Trump, upon whom she lavished praise.

Sharing the news cycle was the Justice Department’s production of documents to the House Oversight Committee. It provided a fraction of the DOJ’s Epstein file, and only 3 percent was new.

August 25: The House Oversight Committee subpoenaed materials from Epstein’s estate and announced that it will depose Alex Acosta on September 19.

Drip, drip, drip…

Trump just delivered the darkest of messages

On Friday, the FBI raided the home and office of John Bolton, President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser.

Although it cannot be confirmed that the agents wore flak jackets emblazoned “DJT Retribution Tour 2025” on the back, they didn’t need to. Trump’s DOJ apparatchiks had already swarmed social media in the most unserious law-enforcement performance since the great Leslie Neilsen’s Police Squad classics.

The tweets were something to see. All just happened to get posted right around the times FBI agents were showing up for coffee with the Boltons. All were delivered in classic mean-face protocol, which of course demanded that no reference be made to anything in particular.

From FBI Director Kash Patel: “NO ONE is above the law … @FBI agents on mission.”

Agents on mission? What are you, 12?

But Patel’s was the serious stake in the ground. Others just retweeted it:

From Attorney General Pam Bondi: “America’s safety isn’t negotiable. Justice will be pursued. Always.”

From Deputy FBI Director Don Bongino: “Public corruption will not be tolerated.”

Bongino’s prospective bunkmate, Andrew Bailey, must be chomping at the bit to have a piece of this action.

This is such amateur hour. These performative fools have debased the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

We have a real problem here. The specifics of Bolton’s situation are beside the point.

In matters referencing national security, affidavits are almost always sealed — sometimes forever. There won’t be a lot of substance for liberals to pore over this weekend with their biscuits and gravy at Cracker Barrel.

The only part of this story worthy of prospective consideration is whether somehow, some way, the Republican political establishment might get nudged out of its cultish trance by this happening to old ally. I don’t think so.

Bolton is not a sympathetic figure on a personal level. From his earliest days as a vitriolic, super-militaristic, hyper-partisan neocon, his persona has remained the rarest of acquired tastes across the political spectrum.

More directly to the point of this story, it remains impossible to forgive Bolton for putting his bank account ahead of his country in 2019. That’s when he refused to testify in Trump’s first impeachment so as not to compromise upcoming profits from the 2020 release of his explosive tell-all book, The Room Where It Happened: A White House Memoir.

Who knows what would have happened had Bolton done the right thing?

It’s widely assumed that the book — and Trump’s years-long public feud with Bolton — are the beginning, middle and end of this FBI adventure. And yes, karma’s a bitch.

But remember that famous old passage? “They came for the crotchety national security advisors, but I wasn’t a crotchety national security advisor, so I said nothing.”

In that sense, Bolton presents an ominous test case. Whatever natural base of supporters he might have had is likely limited to his cellphone contacts. He could be in for a rough time.

And I truly don’t believe anyone should be celebrating that.

I’ll harken back to my June 9 column on another part of Trump’s terroristic playbook. That was about ICE stormtroopers, but it applies equally to the police-state tactics involved today with the FBI:

“There’s an ancient Chinese proverb that reads: “Hang one to scare a hundred.”

I assure you there a whole lot more than a hundred former Trump officials, military brass and other vocal critics who won’t sleep well tonight. Trump just delivered the darkest of messages — and it has been received.

If anyone might harbor even the slightest doubt that this is 100 percent about vindictive, petty and malicious retribution, it’s helpful that the Dark Lord of Vengeance couldn’t contain his devilish glee.

“Good morning. John Bolton. How does it feel to have your home raided at 6 o'clock in the morning?” — Roger Stone.

This is what America voted for.

And John Bolton’s home won’t be the final venue.