A third way to think about fast food
[rebelmouse-image 24750257 original_size="499x499" expand=1]Erik at LGM captures some of my growing discomfort with Mark Bittman's political approach to the question of improving national nutrition. Bittman has taken to scolding people for being lazy more than looking at the underlying reasons people don't cook more. I somewhat agreed with a rant he had a few months back about oatmeal, but in retrospect some of my concern is that liberals are too quick to seize on excuses that sound good---saying, for instance, that oatmeal at McDonald's is cheaper and easier than store oatmeal when it's objectively not---because they have the correct instinct not to assume the worst about people's motives when making food choices. It's a combination of over-reliance on a simplified version of rational actor theory and a rightful rejection of conservative assumptions that people's sufferering is a direct reflection of their lack of merit. But the problem is Bittman is erring too far in the other direction, and assuming that the reason people don't cook more is that they're just lazy and that a good scolding is what's going to get them on the other side of it.

