Top Stories Daily Listen Now
RawStory
RawStory

All posts tagged "police"

This Nebraska mom's ordeal points to the darkness awaiting us all under Trump

Nebraska mom Jamie Bonkiewicz filmed her interaction with Secret Service agents and police who came to her door because of a tweet.

“The Secret Service came to my door today because of a tweet. No threats. No violence. Just words. That’s where we are now.”

Meanwhile, the Justice Department is going after multiple Democratic members of the House and Senate, the governors of two states, the mayor of Minneapolis, and any Republican who speaks against Trump or his lickspittles:

Jerome Powell, Lisa Cook, Mark Kelly, Elissa Slotkin, Jason Crow, Chris Deluzio, Maggie Goodlander, Chrissy Houlahan, Adam Schiff, Eric Swalwell, Chris Christie, Jack Smith, Christopher Krebs, James Comey, Letitia James, John Bolton, Tim Walz, Jacob Frey, Miles Taylor…

Are we really losing our fundamental freedoms under Donald Trump?

Back in 1994, I was invited by a parents group in Singapore to speak about education and ADHD; my book on the topic had just made the cover of TIME magazine. I flew in, they put me up in the city/state’s fanciest hotel, and late the following afternoon I gave my speech. When, during the Q&A afterward, somebody asked me how best to institute the public school reforms I’d suggested, I said words to the effect of, “Get politically active, get your politicians involved, as they control and fund the schools.”

The room went completely quiet, which I thought odd, but then the conversation moved on and I didn’t think about it again until a few hours later when I arrived back at the hotel. My room had been ransacked. The bed was askew, drawers emptied, my suitcase all over the floor, even my toiletry kit spread across the bathroom floor.

When I called down to the hotel’s switchboard to let them know what had happened, the manager came up to my room and carefully told me that the police had visited my room while I was out.

“You must have done or said something suspicious,” he told me. That’s when I remembered the eerie silence in response to my suggestion that people get politically active.

America isn’t Singapore. Yet.

Or Russia, where even standing in the street with a blank sign will get you prison time. Yet.

Or Hungary, where posting on Facebook against Viktor Orbán will get you thrown into jail. Yet.

But we’re sure as hell moving in that direction.

Retired professor Barbara Wien stood outside Stephen Miller’s home passing out “No Nazis in NOVA” [North Virginia] fliers with his picture and the slogan, “Wanted for crimes against humanity.” Three weeks later, she was visited by agents of the FBI, the Secret Service, and a Virginia state policeman, because Miller’s podcaster wife had reportedly called them.

In addition to intimidating Wien, they had a search warrant signed by a judge and took her phone. The New York Times notes:

“The activist … has not been charged with any crime, though the Virginia State Police still have her phone. The investigation remains active, leaving it unclear whether law enforcement has since gathered additional evidence.”

Her lawyer told the Times about his client and the activists who’d been distributing similar flyers in town:

“They were speaking truth to power, and that is really at the core of our Constitution. It’s a principle and a right that our country was founded on.”

True, but the Trump regime doesn’t care about the law.

Washington Post reporter Hannah Natanson had been reporting on Trump’s corruption and reorganization of our government, so FBI agents showed up at her home and took her phone, her laptop, and her sports watch, which had a record of everywhere she’d visited for the past few weeks. They were apparently looking for the names and locations of the federal employees she may have interviewed. As theTimes reported:

“It is exceedingly rare, even in investigations of classified disclosures, for federal agents to search a reporter’s home. A 1980 law generally bars search warrants for reporters’ work materials, unless the reporters themselves are suspected of committing a crime related to the materials.”

True, but the Trump regime doesn’t care about the law.

Meanwhile, a Reagan-appointed federal judge in Boston just said out loud what millions of Americans are feeling in their gut. U.S. District Judge William G. Young, hardly a lefty firebrand, looked at the evidence in front of him and concluded that the Trump administration is using the machinery of the state to punish speech it doesn’t like.

“I find it breathtaking,” Young said, that he was forced to conclude that “high-level officers of our government — cabinet secretaries — [were] conspiring to infringe the First Amendment rights of people with such rights here in the United States.”

Young was presiding over a case involving the arrest and threatened deportation of non-citizen college students and scholars who spoke out on Palestine. What troubled him wasn’t just the individual cases, but the pattern. The brown-nosers around Trump, he said (without using that word), appeared to be deliberately chilling dissent by turning immigration enforcement into a political weapon.

“The record in this case convinces me,” Young said, “that these high officials — and I include the president of the United States — have a fearful view of freedom. A view that defines the freedom here in the United States by who’s excluded.”

In other words, free speech for those who agree with Trump, Miller, Vance, Noem, et al, but fear, harassment, and punishment for those who don’t.

Then Young went farther, in a way judges almost never do. He openly described Trump’s governing style as authoritarian:

“It’s fairly clear that this president believes, as an authoritarian, that when he speaks, everyone — everyone in Article II — is going to toe the line absolutely.”

When a Reagan judge with impeccable conservative credentials and four decades on the bench is sounding alarms about authoritarianism and the collapse of First Amendment norms, it’s not partisan noise. It’s a warning flare shot up into the night.

But, of course, the Trump regime doesn’t care about norms or the Constitution. And if what’s going on isn’t clear enough, Stephen Miller posted last night about Minneapolis:

“Local and state police have been ordered to stand down and surrender.”

I spent decades doing international relief work in some of the worst places on the planet. I’ve had government soldiers threaten my life, police put automatic weapons in my face, and government ministers on three continents solicit bribes from me and my organization.

I’ve met with political prisoners and families whose members were murdered by the state for simply having the wrong political view. I’ve held children as they stopped breathing from starvation and had an aid worker shot to death in front of me.

This is the road to third-world-style-governance that our corrupt felon of a president has put America on. He justifies the execution of Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis, sets his rabid mobs on judges who don’t rule the way he wants, intimidates reporters and sues news outlets to shut them up, and is now threatening to deploy the full force of the federal government to silence dissent, criminalize protest, and punish individual speech he finds inconvenient.

He’s destroying our European alliance to the benefit of his friend and mentor Vladimir Putin, writing to the Norwegian Prime Minister as if Trump alone can determine American foreign policy like some sort of emperor or America’s mad king:

“Dear Jonas: Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace…”

He’s dragging this country step by step toward the sort of strongman state like the ones I used to work in, where loyalty matters more than the law and fear crowds out personal freedom. He’s overseeing a rapid and radical transformation of America from a democratic republic into a strongman oligarchy where billionaires like him, Elon Musk, the 13 billionaires in his cabinet, and the 140 billionaires who supported him in 2024 run the show.

He’s turned America into an oligarchy, in other words. Rich people buy pardons, corporations buy regulations and subsidies they want, and average people are screwed, particularly if they complain too loudly.

But history teaches us that oligarchies are unstable systems of government.

They typically either collapse from their own internal rot (as happened here in 1932 when the Republican Great Depression brought down the oligarchs of the Roaring Twenties) or get overthrown by their own people (as happened here in the 1860s when the fascist Confederate system that had taken over the Old South was destroyed by the Civil War).

And when oligarchies don’t collapse or get overthrown, they morph into tyranny; usually that happens within a single generation.

That’s what happened in Russia. It went from the chaos of the 1990s oligarchy to Putin’s authoritarian state in less than 20 years. It’s also what happened in Hungary, where Viktor Orbán took a newly-liberated democracy and turned it into an authoritarian state in less than a decade. It’s also what’s happening right now in Turkey, the Philippines, Brazil, India, and multiple other countries around the world.

Tyranny doesn’t typically pop up fully formed and all at once. It comes incrementally, moving step by inexorable step, until it hits a tipping point where it can no longer be stopped. Even days before that tipping point is reached, most people still think the system will correct itself, that once everyone figures out what’s happening, things will go back to normal.

They’re almost always wrong.

America is now in that dangerous zone between oligarchy and tyranny. Because of the corrupt Supreme Court Citizens United decision and its 1978 parent Bellotti, our nation’s oligarchs have controlled our politics for a solid 40 years.

They own the media, have captured the courts, and have bought most of Congress. The question for today is whether they’ll be satisfied with their comfortable oligarchy or whether they’ll join Trump and the GOP’s push for America’s final transition to outright dictatorship.

Steve Bannon told us what the goal was: “Deconstruct the administrative state.” That’s tyrant-speak for dismantling the institutions that might dare or have the ability to constrain oligarchic power.

As a result, we’re in a race against time and the window for successful action is narrowing. Every week that the Trump regime isn’t seriously challenged in the states, courts, the press, or at the ballot box, America’s oligarchs tighten their grip. Every election they buy makes the next election easier to purchase. Every judge they install makes the next judge easier to intimidate or buy off.

This isn’t alarmism: it’s the historical pattern, repeated across dozens of countries and thousands of years. I’ve seen it, repeatedly, with my own eyes.

Oligarchies either collapse or they become tyrannies; there’s no third option.

Thus, the only real question now is whether enough of us will recognize what’s happening while there’s still time to stop it. Republics like ours die — like Russia and Hungary did — when ordinary people convince themselves that the warning signs aren’t real. At least until the knock on the door comes for them.

And then, of course, it’s too late…

It's not just ICE actions — Trump's words also point to a deeply sinister truth

When Joe Rogan starts referring to the Trump regime as if they’re Nazis, you know ICE and the GOP have a problem. On Tuesday, Rogan said:

“Are we really going to be the Gestapo? Where’s your papers? Is that what we’ve come to?”

At the end of this month, funding for the Department of Homeland Security runs out. Congress is going to have to act and that makes this a very important moment, politically.

The attraction of ICE to white supremacists — and now their open appeal to racists in their recruiting messages — didn’t start with George W. Bush adopting the word “Homeland” on Oct. 8, 2001, the first time it’d been publicly used by a mainstream politician in American history. It arguably started on Sept. 5, 1934, with a speech by Rudolf Hess, introducing Adolf Hitler at the Nuremberg Rally.

I have a weird connection to that speech, and it’s always haunted me. For more than half of my life I’ve been a volunteer for a German-based international relief organization that was founded by Gottfried Müller, who’d been an intelligence officer in Hitler’s army until he was captured in Iran and spent virtually all of WWII in a prison camp. There, he had a conversion experience and dedicated his life to helping “the least of the least of this world, as Jesus taught us.”

Müller told me how he was there for that Nuremberg Rally, in which Hess introduced Hitler with the following speech:

Danke irher Führung wird Deutschland sein Zeil erreichen. Heimat zu sein. Heimat zu sein für alle Deutschen der Welt. (“Thanks to your leadership, Germany will reach its goal: to be a homeland. A homeland to be for all Germans of the world.”)

This use of Heimat (“Homeland”) was intentional on the part of Hess and Hitler. “Homeland” suggested a racial identity, as Hitler noted in Mein Kampf when he speaks of the German people as a racial organism with the German land (Boden) and hereditarily German people (Volk) inseparable:

“The German Reich must gather together and protect all the racially valuable elements of Germandom, wherever they may be.” (Volume II, chapter 13)

As Herr Müller told me, Hitler wanted to create an identity that went beyond language and culture. He wanted to posit a pure “German race,” and have Germany be that race’s “homeland,” all so he could sell to the German people their own racial superiority and use that to justify exterminating others.

Throughout American history, our leaders have avoided that type of language:

  • Thomas Paine wrote: “The cause of America is in a great measure the cause of all mankind.”
  • Abraham Lincoln said our Founders created “a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal…”
  • Woodrow Wilson used the word “democracy” instead of “homeland” during WWI: “The world must be made safe for democracy.
  • FDR simply used the name of our nation on Dec. 7, 1941: “The United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked…”

Across 220-plus years, during revolution, civil war, global war, and even the attack on Pearl Harbor, American presidents systematically avoided homeland-style language that implied ancestral ownership, ethnic belonging, or insiders versus outsiders.

Instead, they used words like: republic, nation, people, citizens, democracy, and country to describe America. This wasn’t accidental: it was the core distinction between American civic nationalism, and 19th century European whites-only ethno-nationalism.

George W. Bush blew that all up when he announced the creation of the Department of Homeland Security. I immediately called it out, writing more than 20 years ago that using that word would lead America in a dark direction.

And here we are.

ICE is now openly using white supremacist slogans, memes, and advertisements to recruit men who’re enthusiastic about chasing down Black and brown people. As the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Hatewatch project documents:

“The increase in white nationalist content [from ICE] appears to originate with a June 11, 2025 post. That day, DHS’ official X and Instagram accounts posted a graphic of Uncle Sam hammering up a sign with the caption: “Help your country … and yourself … REPORT ALL FOREIGN INVADERS.” A hotline number for ICE accompanied the post.

“Mother Jones reported the doctored graphic of Uncle Sam originated from an X user called ‘Mr. Robert,’ who is associated with white nationalist content. Mr. Robert’s bio highlights the phrase: ‘Wake Up White Man.’

Since then, it’s been a nonstop barrage of white nationalist and Nazi rhetoric and symbology, as compiled by Dean Blundell.

  • Kristi Noem behind a podium with the words “One of ours. All of yours.” As Malcolm Nance noted: “This is the order to kill all the people in the village of Lidice in Czech Republic when the sadist SS General Heydrich was ambushed and killed by the British SOE. THEY ORDERED 173 MEN MASSACRED. ALL WOMEN AND CHILDREN SENT TO AUSCHWITZ WITH THESE WORDS.”
  • The US Department of Labor posting an image of George Washington with the words: “One Homeland. One People. One Heritage,” an eerie echo of “Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer (One People, One Nation, One Leader).
  • Border Patrol Chief Greg Bovino, who showed up in Minneapolis last week, photographed for the ICE/CPB website in nearly-full Nazi drag.

Others consistently feature white people with slogans or images appealing to a white supremacist or nationalist base:

As political scientist Dr. Rachel Bitecofer noted in her excellent The Cycle newsletter:

“‘We’ll have our home again’ is the emotional core of Great Replacement ideology, the white nationalist belief system that frames demographic change as dispossession and recasts the nation as something that has been stolen and must be taken back. This is the same worldview that produced the chant ‘You will not replace us’ at Charlottesville. The only thing that has changed is who is now saying it. …

“This ideology is not abstract. It has been articulated explicitly by mass shooters, embedded in white nationalist manifestos, and popularized by contemporary influencers who now operate openly in American political discourse. Figures like Nick Fuentes center their politics on the claim that the United States properly belongs to a single cultural and racial group, and that reclaiming it requires hierarchy, exclusion, and force.”

From Hess to Bush to Trump, here we are.

One of the regular themes of callers to my radio/TV show is the question:

“Are they hiding their faces behind masks so we can’t see that so many of these well-paid goons are open members of the Klan, Proud Boys, Patriot Front, Goyim Defense League, and J6ers?”

It’s as good an answer for the masks as any other I can come up with. Throughout American history, the only police agency known to conceal their identities were the Klansmen in the late 19th and early 20th centuries when they were routinely deputized in the South to police segregation laws.

The police officers who murdered the civil rights workers Chaney, Goodman, and Schwerner in Mississippi on June 21, 1964 were all Klansmen, and that’s where Donald Trump Jr. went to give a speech on “states’ rights,” echoing Ronald Reagan’s first official speech on the same subject in the same place after he got his party’s nomination in 1980.

On Tuesday, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) sent a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem asking if their “white nationalist ‘dog whistles’” are being used in their recruitment campaigns that appear to target members of “extremist militias” like the Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, and Three Percenters:

“Unique among all law enforcement agencies and all branches of the armed services, ICE agents conceal their identities, wearing masks and removing names from their uniforms. Why is that? Why do National Guard members, state, county, and local police officers, and members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines all routinely work unmasked while ICE agents work masked?

“Who is hiding behind these masks? How many of them were among the violent rioters who attacked the Capitol on January 6 and were convicted of their offenses? The American people deserve to know how many of these violent insurrectionists have been given guns and badges by this administration.”

Racism has been one of the animating themes of Trump’s three candidacies and two administrations; finally Americans and the mainstream media are waking up to it and calling it out.

We need a purge, and that begins by calling our elected officials at 202-224-3121 and telling them to vote “No” on funding DHS and ICE until there have been significant reforms.

Get rid of the masks and weapons of war. Require them to follow the law and the Constitution. No more arrests or home invasions without warrants signed by judges per the Fourth Amendment.

If America is a homeland, it’s only a homeland to the surviving Native Americans who Europeans haven’t entirely wiped out.

It’s far past time to end this use of white ethnonationalist rhetoric, rename the Department of Homeland Security, and purge that organization — and it’s ICE offspring — of their white nationalist bigots.

Two women were killed. MAGA's reactions lay bare its callous indifference to reality

Like everyone, I’ve been spending a lot of time thinking about Renee Nicole Good and the horrible fate that befell her in Minneapolis last Wednesday. Given what we’ve seen on video, that there is even debate over whether she deserved to die is absolutely unfathomable.

Facts:

  • Good was murdered (not merely “killed”) by ICE agent Jonathan Ross, in cold blood, at point blank range.
  • Ross purposefully stepped into the path of Good’s SUV and made sure he was (briefly) in harm’s way before firing the first shot as Good attempted to steer around him. The second and third shots were the results of pure fury.
  • Good was friendly and peaceful and in no way gunning to harm any ICE agent — as seen on Ross’s own cellphone recording.
  • By contrast, Ross was rageful and homicidal, seemingly hellbent on murdering Good for the crime of failing to follow a ludicrous order. Or because her wife was talking smack to him. Or both. His dismissing her — after blowing her away — as a “f------ bitch” speaks to a devastating lack of respect for human life.
  • Good was initially denied lifesaving medical aid.
  • Good was not a “domestic terrorist” but a woman who had just dropped her six-year-old child at school. The only terrorists were the ones she encountered, wearing masks and vests.

Almost equally terrifying were the immediate attacks on Good from Donald Trump, JD Vance, Kristi Noem, and others in positions of authority in the administration — before they knew a thing about her.

Good was reduced to a supposed subhuman, by people who dismissed her as a deserving victim in their ongoing assault on Blue America.

Furthermore, the FBI quickly announced that Minnesota state officials would not be permitted to participate in any investigation into Good’s death.

In layman’s terms, that’s called a cover-up.

Now let’s travel back to January 6, 2021, and a justifiable killing.

Ashli Babbitt was part of the mob that Trump provoked to storm the U.S. Capitol. A 35-year-old U.S. Air Force veteran, she was an increasingly radicalized adherent of the QAnon conspiracy theory, conditioned to believe the 2020 election had been stolen from Trump – because he said so.

Despite multiple warnings not to proceed, Babbitt attempted to climb through a shattered window beside a barricaded door to the House Speaker’s Lobby. At that point, she was shot in the shoulder, from inside the lobby, by U.S. Capitol Police (USCP) Lieutenant Michael Byrd.

After a USCP emergency response team administered aid, Babbitt was transported to Washington Hospital Center, where she died. Found to be carrying a pocketknife, she was the lone insurrectionist shot and killed by police.

USCP deemed the shooting “lawful and within department policy” and to have “potentially saved members of Congress and staff from serious injury and possible death.”

Almost immediately, Trump and MAGAworld seized on Babbitt’s killing as unnecessary, with Trump himself describing her, to Fox News, as “an innocent, wonderful, incredible woman.”

Unaddressed was the matter of Babbitt having attempted to smash her way into a government building with potentially murderous intent, as part of an angry mob looking to halt the certification of a presidential election.

Again: she was warned repeatedly to stop.

To those behind Trump’s Stop the Steal movement, none of this mattered at all. Babbitt was a perfect martyr for the cause, despite her death happening amid violent mayhem.

Trump jumped on the narrative that Babbitt was sacrificed for being a woman and it was up to him to protect women — which, given his professed penchant for grabbing women by the genitals, could not have been more ridiculous. Nonetheless, he insisted she died for lack of protection.

In April 2021, the U.S. Department of Justice under President Joe Biden announced following an investigation there was insufficient evidence to support a criminal prosecution of the officer who fired.

The key word here is “investigation.” A real one took place.

In early 2024, Babitt’s family filed a $30 million wrongful death lawsuit against the U.S. government. It went nowhere until last May, when the Trump administration reached an agreement to pay a $5 million settlement on the civil complaint.

Then, in August, the U.S. Air Force astonishingly confirmed it would confer full military funeral honors to Babbitt, a decision that inspired anger from those who still see the January 6 insurrection as a black eye on America’s soul.

Former Republican congressman Adam Kinzinger, a member of the House January 6 Committee and an Air Force veteran, called the decision “disgusting.”

Micki Witthoeft, mother of Ashli Babbitt Micki Witthoeft, mother of Ashli Babbitt, speaks in Washington, D.C., last week. REUTERS/Leah Millis

So let’s compare and contrast.

Last week, in Minneapolis, a woman in her mid-30s looking to assist those targeted by ICE, who was otherwise minding her own business and looking to depart the scene once trouble started, had three bullets pumped into her face, was denied immediate medical aid, and in death was instantly denigrated and defamed as a liberal agitator who got what was coming.

Five years ago, in Washington, D.C., a woman in her mid-30s driven by conspiratorial, delusional mania was killed for, it seemed, looking to harm her perceived enemies. Her death was mourned by the same people who now vilify Good, and her family was enriched with millions of dollars and given the thanks of a grateful military, as if she were taken while defending the nation.

What’s wrong with this picture? Literally everything.

What’s the difference between Renee Nicole Good and Ashli Babbitt and the way those on the hideous right choose to view the groundless murder of one against the killing of the other while engaged in a criminal act?

Pure, unadulterated fascism, and a callous indifference to reality.

  • Ray Richmond is a longtime journalist/author and an adjunct professor at Chapman University in Orange, CA.

ICE does things most police won't — and now we have deadly proof

By Ben Jones, Assistant Professor of Public Policy and Research Associate in the Rock Ethics Institute, Penn State.

Minneapolis is once again the focus of debates about violence involving law enforcement, after an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer shot and killed Renee Nicole Good, a 37-year-old mother, in her car.

The incident quickly prompted dueling narratives. Trump administration officials defended the shooting as justified, while local officials condemned it.

The shooting will also likely prompt renewed scrutiny of training and policy of officers and the question of them shooting at moving vehicles. There has been a recent trend in law enforcement toward policies that prohibit such shootings. It is a policy shift that has shown promise in saving lives.

Decades ago, the New York City Police Department prohibited officers from shooting at moving vehicles. That led to a drop in police killings without putting officers in greater danger.

Debates over deadly force are often contentious, but as I note in my research on police ethics and policy, for the most part there is consensus on one point: Policing should reflect a commitment to valuing human life and prioritizing its protection. Many use-of-force policies adopted by police departments endorse that principle.

Yet, as in Minneapolis, controversial law enforcement killings continue to occur. Not all agencies have implemented prohibitions on shooting at vehicles. Even in agencies that have, some policies are weak or ambiguous.

In addition, explicit prohibitions on shooting at vehicles are largely absent from the law, which means that officers responsible for fatal shootings of drivers that appear to violate departmental policies still often escape criminal penalties.

In the case of ICE, which is part of the Department of Homeland Security, its policy on shooting at moving vehicles — unlike that of many police agencies — lacks a clear instruction for officers to get out of the way of moving vehicles where feasible. It’s an omission at odds with generally recognized best practices in policing.

ICE policy

ICE’s use-of-force policy prohibits its officers from “discharging firearms at the operator of a moving vehicle” unless it is necessary to stop a grave threat. The policy is explicit that deadly force should not be used “solely to prevent the escape of a fleeing suspect.”

That point is relevant for evaluating the fatal shooting in Minneapolis. Videos show one officer trying to open the door of the vehicle that Good was driving, while another officer appears to be in front of the vehicle as she tried to pull away.

Shooting to prevent the driver simply from getting away would have been in violation of agency policy and obviously inconsistent with prioritizing the protection of life.

ICE’s policy lacks clear instruction, however, for its officers to get out of the way of moving vehicles where feasible. In contrast, the Department of Justice’s use-of-force policy makes it explicit that officers should not shoot at a vehicle if they can protect themselves by “moving out of the path of the vehicle.”

Notably, President Joe Biden issued an executive order in 2022 requiring federal law enforcement agencies — like ICE — to adopt use-of-force policies “that are equivalent to, or exceed, the requirements” of the Department of Justice’s policy.

Despite that order, the provision to step out of the way of moving cars never made it into the use-of-force policy that applies to ICE.

Rationale for not shooting

Prioritizing the protection of life doesn’t rule out deadly force. Sometimes such force is necessary to protect lives from a grave threat, such as an active shooter. But it does rule out using deadly force when less harmful tactics can stop a threat. In such cases, deadly force is unnecessary — a key consideration in law and ethics that can render force unjustified.

That’s the concern involved with police shooting at moving vehicles. It often is not necessary because officers have a less harmful option to avoid a moving vehicle’s threat: stepping out of the way.

This guidance has the safety of both suspects and police in mind. Obviously, police not shooting lowers the risk of harm to the suspect. But it also lowers the risk to the officer in the vast majority of cases because of the laws of physics. If you shoot the driver of a car barreling toward you, that rarely brings a car to an immediate stop, and the vehicle often continues on its path.

Many police departments have incorporated these insights into their policies. A recent analysis of police department policies in the 100 largest U.S. cities found that close to three-quarters of them have prohibitions against shooting at moving vehicles.

Gap between policy and best practices

The shooting in Minneapolis serves as a stark reminder of the stubborn gap that often persists between law and policy on the one hand and best law enforcement practices for protecting life on the other. When steps are taken to close that gap, however, they can have a meaningful impact.

Some of the most compelling examples involve local, state and federal measures that reinforce one another. Consider the “fleeing felon rule,” which used to allow police to shoot a fleeing felony suspect to prevent their escape even when the suspect posed no danger to others.

That rule was at odds with the doctrine of prioritizing the protection of life, leading some departments to revise their use-of-force policies and some states to ban the rule. In 1985, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that it was unconstitutional for police to shoot a fleeing suspect who was not a danger.

Banning that questionable tactic notably led to a reduction in killings by police.

This history suggests that clear bans in law and policy on questionable tactics have the potential to save lives, while also strengthening the means for holding officers accountable.

'This is wrong': MAGA sheriffs furious as Trump admin poaches deputies to beef up ICE

Local law police departments and sheriff's offices across the country are being targeted by the Trump administration as ICE scrambles to meet its sky-high recruitment quotas, NBC News reported.

"As it attempts to hire 10,000 new ICE agents, the Trump Administration this week tried recruiting local law enforcement officers away from sheriff’s offices in multiple states, alienating some allies along the way," correspondent Jesse Kirsch posted to X on Thursday.

The Pinellas County Sheriff's Office near Tampa, Florida, told NBC News, “ICE actively trying to use our partnership to recruit our personnel is wrong and we have expressed our concern to ICE leadership." Kirsch noted that Pinellas County Sheriff Bob Gualtieri "is an elected Republican who has been supportive of President Trump."

Sheriff's offices in other states, including Georgia, Texas, and Florida, confirmed to NBC News that the administration has reached out via email to try to recruit deputies in their departments.

A Florida police chief spoke to NBC News on condition of anonymity, claiming that the ICE effort will exacerbate hiring challenges currently faced by local departments.

“Now you know why everybody’s so p-----," the chief said.

When asked about their recruitment efforts, a senior DHS official told NBC News, “ICE is recruiting law enforcement, veterans, and other patriots who want to serve their country and help remove gang members, child pedophiles, murderers, terrorists, and drug traffickers. This includes local law enforcement, veterans, and our 287(g) partners who have already been trained and have valuable law enforcement experience."

According to the ICE website, the 287(g) program trains local law enforcement agencies "to enforce certain aspects of U.S. immigration law" to protect their communities "from potentially dangerous criminal aliens."

At least one sheriff told NBC News he was "100% supportive" of the federal government's recruitment efforts.

"I think if someone wants to better their life, better their career… there's nothing better than the US government to go out and have a successful career,” Sheriff Thaddeus C. Cleveland with Terrell County, TX, told NBC News.

Trump's masked enforcers point to dark and dangerous truths

In Los Angeles, they came at night, black helmets, tactical gear, no names, no insignia. Protesters were grabbed off the streets and loaded into unmarked vans. No one knew who they were. No one could ask. Their faces were hidden. Their power, absolute.

We are entering an era in which the agents of state power no longer have faces.

Across the country, from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids in upstate New York to militarized police responses in Atlanta, Chicago, and Portland, Americans are increasingly confronted by law enforcement officers whose identities are concealed. Their names stripped from badges. Their faces obscured by masks, goggles, and helmets. Their authority rendered anonymous.

The stated rationale is familiar: protection from doxxing, retaliation, or harassment. And in an age of hyper-polarization and digital vigilantism, those concerns are not entirely unfounded. Former Federal Bureau of Investigation agent Ali Soufan warns, “Visibility puts a target on your back in the age of online extremism.” That may be true. But the inverse — faceless authority — puts a target on democracy itself.

At what point does protecting the enforcer obscure the principle of enforcement?

A democracy policed by faceless enforcers is not merely a tactical adaptation. It is a philosophical departure.

In literature, masks symbolize both freedom and concealment, rebellion and repression. Oscar Wilde famously quipped, “Give a man a mask and he’ll tell you the truth.” But there’s another truth lurking beneath: Masks don’t just enable expression; they also enable erasure.

Social psychologists have long understood this. In 1969, Stanford researcher Philip Zimbardo conducted a now-classic experiment in which participants donned hooded robes and were instructed to administer electric shocks to others. Unsurprisingly, the masked participants delivered higher shocks, exhibiting greater aggression and reduced empathy.

Even children grasp this dynamic. In a Halloween study, masked kids were significantly more likely to steal extra candy than their unmasked peers. A hidden face, even for a moment, grants permission to break the rules.

When combined with state power, anonymity can override individual conscience and turn human beings into instruments of group will.

The history of masked violence in America is not speculative; it is foundational. The Ku Klux Klan’s hooded anonymity wasn’t incidental. It was central to their terror. By day, Klan members were judges, sheriffs, or civic leaders. By night, they became ghosts, free to punish without consequence.

In Nazi Germany, SS and Gestapo agents wore masks during night raids, not only to instill fear but also to psychologically distance themselves from their crimes. In Chile under Augusto Pinochet, secret police donned balaclavas while abducting dissidents. In Iran under the Shah, SAVAK agents masked their faces during torture sessions to erase accountability.

This tactic is a hallmark of authoritarian regimes: concealment of identity to enable unchecked violence.

It is crucial to approach such parallels with care. No one is saying that masked ICE agents in American cities are equivalent to Gestapo squads in Berlin. But the comparison should serve as a warning, not a distraction. The question is not whether history repeats perfectly, but whether we are ignoring its lessons.

Of course, law enforcement officers face real threats. They have been harassed, even targeted for violence. Those risks are real and deserve attention. But the solution cannot be to erode public accountability.

We do not allow judges to hide their names. We do not permit anonymous juries. Our system of justice, however imperfect, relies on visible responsibility. To abandon that ideal in the name of safety is to accept a dangerous new social contract: one in which power flows only one way.

But here’s the hopeful truth: When communities resist the normalization of masked authority, they can win.

In Portland, Oregon, during the 2020 racial justice protests, federal agents from the Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Marshals deployed in camouflage uniforms and unmarked vehicles detained protesters without identifying themselves.

The move drew national outrage and lawsuits. Oregon’s attorney general filed suit to stop these “secret police-style” tactics, and public pressure led to federal inspectors general investigating the practice. By 2021, Congress passed a provision requiring federal agents deployed in civil disturbances to display visible identification showing their name or a unique ID code and their agency.

In New York, years of grassroots organizing by groups like Communities United for Police Reform led to the June 2020 repeal of Section 50‑a, a decades-old law that had shielded police disciplinary records from public view. The change came amid mass protests, underlining how collective action can dismantle policies of anonymity that enable abuse.

In Oakland, California, the issue of hidden identity became headline news in 2011, during the Occupy Oakland demonstrations. An officer was caught on video covering his nameplate with tape, a violation of departmental policy. He was suspended for 30 days, and his supervising lieutenant was demoted. Public outrage led to stronger rules requiring all Oakland officers to display badge numbers and name tags even when outfitted in riot gear.

These victories didn’t happen overnight. They were the result of sustained advocacy and legal challenges. And they remind us: Faceless authority can be challenged, but only if we refuse to accept it as inevitable.

The logic of masking metastasizes. Today it may be ICE. Tomorrow it could be traffic cops, school resource officers, or regulators enforcing housing codes and environmental policy. Once anonymity is normalized, it becomes nearly impossible to roll back.

Imagine being confronted by a law enforcement officer whose face is completely obscured. What would you feel? Fear? Confusion? Powerlessness? These are not accidental responses. Perhaps that is the point.

But a free society cannot function on intimidation.

We live in an open society. Police do not rule us; they serve us. To wear a badge is to accept a burden, to be known, to be scrutinized, to be restrained by the public’s gaze.

The philosopher Michel Foucault warned that power is most effective when it is least visible. But the inverse is also true: Power is most just when it is most seen.

A democracy cannot thrive on ghosts. It requires people, real, visible people, making visible decisions in the full light of day.
So, what can be done?

To stop the normalization of faceless power, we can:

  • Demand transparency laws banning face coverings in non-high-risk operations;
  • Support local watchdog journalism that documents abuses of anonymity;
  • Join campaigns for demilitarizing police departments and banning unmarked uniforms during public interactions; and
  • Insist on civilian oversight boards with real teeth to enforce accountability.

The mask is not a neutral tool. It is a statement. And it is one that a free society cannot afford to make lightly.

If we want a future where power serves people, not the other way around, it begins with insisting that authority shows its face.

  • George Cassidy Payne is a writer, educator, and social justice advocate. He lives in Irondequoit, New York.

Cops hunt 4-year-old boy whose disappearance 5 years ago was just reported

A small boy who was last seen five years ago and was just recently reported missing has left authorities in Delaware County, Indiana, scrambling for answers.

Four-year-old Hayden Manis, who had been living with his grandparents, was last seen on Christmas Eve in 2019. The child had just been reunited with his father, Dustin Manis, who regained custody after completing court-ordered probation, drug treatment, and counseling.

According to reporting from The Independent, Dustin kept in touch with the family via Facebook but never produced the child. He reportedly told family and police that Hayden's mother had the boy, "but authorities later confirmed that was a lie and the Department of Child Services never placed Hayden with her."

“We think [Hayden] actually went missing sometime in 2020 but, so far, we have not been able to pinpoint an actual date,” Delaware County Sheriff Chief Deputy Jeff Stanley told 13News in Indianapolis.

ALSO READ: 'Hero': Latest school shooter celebrated as followers float copycat plans

Dustin's last direct message to his aunt in 2023 read, "Hey aunt barb, I promise on everything all is well,” he wrote,“[I] promise [I’ve] just been having a lot going on try to work on my family that I am making and what not I appreciate u reaching out and checking.”

Muncie, Indiana, police arrested Dustin on drug charges in November 2024. He died a month later from a drug overdose, The Independent reported.

“Just because Dustin Manis is dead does not mean the investigation is dead. We’re still going forward,” Delaware County prosecutor Eric Hoffman told 13News.

Hoffman also said he no longer believes the boy, who would be 9 years old, is still alive.

“It’s haunting. It’s definitely haunting, some of the facts of this case,” Hoffman said. “There are very few days I come to this office and I don’t think about Hayden Manis. This case is on my mind, and it’s on the investigators’ minds on a daily basis. We’re not going to stop until we get to an answer. We need to know the truth.”

Read the story in The Independent here.

Chicago letter carriers face bullets and beatings while postal service sidelines police

CHICAGO — As a little girl in the 1980s, Khalalisa Norris aspired to become a letter carrier. She’d sit on her front porch in Chicago’s Austin neighborhood and wait for her local mailman, and eventual mail lady, each day.

In her 20s, Norris realized her dream, and ever since, she’s delivered mail on Chicago’s West Side.

But that dream became a nightmare.

Norris was working an overtime shift in the Austin neighborhood when she saw two men run past her toward a corner liquor store. As Norris exited an apartment building and returned to her mail cart, one man jumped in front of her, stopping the cart and pointing a gun in her face. The other walked alongside her and stuck a gun to her temple.

Both had their fingers on the trigger and said “we just want the keys,” Norris, now 46, told Raw Story in an exclusive interview. Norris took her set of arrow keys — the universal keys letter carriers use to open blue letter boxes that dot America’s street corners — and threw them at the robbers.

Norris froze in place until the criminals fled, fearing that if she attempted to run, they would “shoot me in my back.”

The violent day in January 2023 left Norris traumatized and changed.

“They took more from me than just those keys,” she said.

Norris’ ordeal is becoming too common: Letter carrier robberies skyrocketed by 543 percent between 2019 and 2022, according to a February 2024 United States Postal Service publication.

Such lawlessness and violence has made the job of letter carriers — once coveted for its government benefits and respected for its service to America since the country’s founding — an increasingly hazardous job.

Mail carriers, especially those such as Norris who’ve been assaulted, want their federal government employer, the United States Postal Service, to do more — much more — to protect them.

That, however, may not be possible because of restrictions on who can actually patrol the streets where letter carriers work.

Because of a 2020 statute reinterpretation from the Postal Service, its own dwindling uniformed police force of 450 officers no longer patrols streets where letter carriers like Norris deliver the mail.

Instead, postal police officers, whose numbers exceeded 2,600 in the 1970s, are relegated to only working on postal properties, such as neighborhood post offices and regional distribution centers. This shift in policing responsibilities, largely unknown to the general public, has embroiled the Postal Service and the Postal Police Officers Association union in a four-year-long dispute that remains unresolved.

Mail robberies, meanwhile, take a hefty financial toll on citizens and financial institutions alike, contributing to nearly $100 million in stolen checks per month, according to research from David Maimon, a professor who runs the Evidence-based Cybersecurity Research Group at Georgia State University.

“We have nobody. We’re out there by ourselves. We can get accosted and jumped,” said Elise Foster, a letter carrier and president for the Chicago branch of the National Association of Letter Carriers. “They can, with a gun, do whatever they want.”

Norris, union leaders and criminologists tell Raw Story the solution is simple: The United States Postal Inspection Service — the law enforcement arm of the Postal Service — should use its uniformed postal police officers on mail routes to deter criminals.

Yet, the agency currently refuses to put its postal police officers back on the streets, arguing that doing so increases liability. Its separate postal inspector force, as opposed to rank-and-file officers, can protect carriers, the agency contends.

So far, that hasn’t been the case, postal employees tell Raw Story.

Rising crime against letter carriers

Mailbox arrow keys are a prized commodity among criminals. Thieves are brazen in their pursuit of them. Steal one, and you can access street-side mailboxes and mailboxes in communal buildings that are filled with packages, credit cards, checks, cash and personal information to create fraudulent accounts.

Yes, a single arrow key can indeed open multiple blue boxes and communal mailboxes in a given area, half a dozen postal employees confirmed to Raw Story.

arrow keysCriminals sell arrow keys, as pictured, for thousands of dollars on black market websites. This screen grab from the dark web, obtained by the Evidence-based Cybersecurity Research Group at Georgia State University, shows arrow keys in California being sold for $1,500 last year. (Photo courtesy of David Maimon)

The mail has become “another avenue for bad actors to try and enrich themselves,” said Spencer Block, a postal inspector and public information officer at the Chicago division headquarters of the United States Postal Inspection Service.

Between the 2019 and 2022 fiscal years, robbery investigations jumped from 94 to 423 nationwide, according to the U.S. Postal Inspection Service’s annual reports.

During fiscal year 2022, fewer than one in four robbery cases resulted in arrests, and fewer than one in six ended in a conviction, according to the U.S. Postal Inspection Service’s annual reports.

Letter carrier robberies, specifically, grew more than sixfold, increasing from 64 cases in fiscal year 2019 to 412 in fiscal year 2022, according to the February 2024 edition of The Eagle, the quarterly magazine for Postal Service employees. There were 326,760 letter carriers employed by the Postal Service as of mid-2022, according to. the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

“Our presence wasn't carrying the weight that it once had in terms of … we're federal employees and nothing’s going to happen to us," said Mack Julion, a letter carrier and assistant secretary-treasurer for the National Association of Letter Carriers. “They're not afraid to rob, to assault, to do whatever. If they're involved in criminal activity, we're not hands off.”

Postal police officer patrols used to deter criminals while letter carriers delivered their routes, five postal service employees told Raw Story.

Norris remembers six or seven years ago when postal police officers would still sit in patrol cars marked with the U.S. Postal Service logo in high-crime areas. Sometimes, they got out of their vehicles and walked around in uniform. They carried guns and could make arrests. They could escort a letter carrier if the letter carrier felt unsafe.

postal police officer in Detroit A postal police officer in Detroit greets a letter carrier. (Photo courtesy of the Postal Police Officers Association)

Now, Norris said criminals “don't feel or see their presence.” She and her fellow letter carriers are in “survival mode” when they do their jobs. She estimated she hasn’t seen a postal police officer on the streets since 2017 or 2018 — at the very least since the COVID-19 pandemic started four years ago.

“Once they stopped seeing them, that's when the crime went up, especially with the taking of the arrow keys, robbing us at gunpoint,” Norris said. “They made it very easy and convenient for them because they would rob one area, go to the next. By the time they figure out from the carrier that got robbed at gunpoint, they will be in another ZIP code doing it again.”

The limitations on postal police officers go as far as prohibiting them from intervening if they witness an assault or crime off postal property, postal employees told Raw Story.

“They tell us to keep going and call Chicago police. Just call 911,” said Marlon Barber, a postal police officer since 2019, who works downtown.

It’s not just Chicago where letter carriers are under attack. It’s a problem from Salt Lake City to Miami, where mail carriers are also being robbed, Julion said.

In 2022, two men allegedly shot and killed letter carrier Aundre Cross as he delivered mail in Milwaukee. Four individuals have been charged in relation to the alleged “targeted attack,” according to Milwaukee TV station WTMJ 4.

Crimes against letter carriers are less likely to be seen outside of cities, with the vast majority occurring in major metro areas, but suburbs and rural areas have experienced crime too, according to news reports compiled by the Postal Police Officers Association union.

ALSO READ: Inside the neo-Nazi hate network grooming children for a race war

John Cruz, a letter carrier and president of the National Association of Letter Carriers’ Brooklyn and Staten Island branch in New York, said it’s “tough time right now” for letter carriers who are often “scared” and “frustrated” with their jobs. It also comes during a period of significant turbulence for the Postal Service, which is in the midst of a massive, and controversial reorganization amid ongoing financial difficulties. Postal facility consolidations were ultimately paused in May 2024 through at least January 2025.

Cruz said a letter carrier in Brooklyn, N.Y.’s Brownsville neighborhood was assaulted on the job during a robbery — she was hit on the head where she had a previous surgery wound.

Now, she doesn’t want to return to work, especially since the alleged assailant has been released from jail.

“They want to go home to their family the same way they walked in. Safe,” Cruz said. “Unfortunately, we don't even know what's going to happen today or tomorrow.”

Members of the Postal Service Board of Governors, an 11-member governing body whose members are nominated by the president and confirmed by the U.S. Senate, were not made available for interview, including Postmaster General Louis DeJoy.

Surging check fraud

The Postal Service itself acknowledged that it finds itself in the midst of a “crime wave.”

This entails a ”significant rise in mail theft and crimes against postal employees,” according to the February 2024 edition of Postal Service's magazine, The Eagle.

“High-volume theft from mail receptacles” increased by 87 percent between 2019 and 2022, rising from 20,574 reports to 38,535 reports, the magazine said.

Yet, as mail thefts skyrocketed, related arrests declined nearly 40 percent between 2019 and 2022, according to Postal Inspection Service annual reports.

In fiscal year 2022, there were 1,124 cases of mail theft with 1,258 arrests — some cases involved multiple suspects — and 1,188 convictions.

By comparison, in fiscal year 2019, there were 1,278 mail theft cases, 2,078 arrests and 2,067 convictions.

In fiscal year 2023, there were 1,197 mail theft cases initiated, resulting in 1,559 arrests and 1,210 convictions, according to the latest annual report from the United States Postal Inspect Service.

The U.S. Postal Service Office of Inspector General — an independent entity that investigates fraud, waste and abuse in the postal agency — published a critical report in September about the Postal Service’s response to mail theft.

U.S. Treasury checksA photo of piles of U.S. Treasury checks in Philadelphia appears on the dark web, obtained by the Evidence-based Cybersecurity Research Group at Georgia State University, which crossed out personal information. (Photo courtesy of David Maimon)

The Inspector General report found that while the Postal Service is attempting to improve security measures around collection boxes and arrow keys, the efforts aren’t enough to effectively thwart mail theft. The Postal Service, investigators wrote, lacked “actionable milestones” for its mail theft initiatives, faced challenges with staffing to address the issue and hadn’t defined a purpose for its Mail Theft Analytics Program.

Perhaps most notably, the report said the Postal Service “lacks accountability for their arrow keys, which are often a target in carrier robberies and are used to commit mail theft.”

Postal Service leaders submitted a written response to the Inspector General’s report, in which they disagreed with four of seven recommendations, including having the chief postal inspector assess staffing resources for the mail theft program and making a plan to “fully deploy eArrow locks” — electronic versions — and “high security mailbox initiatives.”

Tara Linne, a spokesperson for the U.S. Postal Service Office of Inspector General, said its recommendation to evaluate “proposed quantities, projected cost and actionable milestones to fully deploy mail theft measures, including high security collection boxes and eArrow locks,” remained open as of March 14.

“Our office is seeking additional information from the Postal Service regarding their proposed actions through our audit resolution process,” Linne said.

Block, of the United States Postal Inspection Service, told Raw Story in a phone interview that mail theft is the “bread and butter” of the U.S. Postal Service’s investigations.

“Our overall mission is to ensure the sanctity and integrity of the mail and of the Postal Service to make sure that the public has confidence that when they put something in their mailbox that it's going to end up at its final destination, and by a significant margin, it does,” Block said.

ALSO READ: Racism, arrests, extreme MAGA love: Meet Lauren Boebert’s primary opponents

In February 2023, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, a bureau within the U.S. Treasury Department, issued an alert about “mail theft-related check fraud schemes targeting the U.S. mail.” It noted that the Postal Inspection Service received 299,020 mail theft complaints between March 2020 and February 2021, representing a 161 percent increase from the year prior.

Six months after the February 2023 alert, the bureau analyzed reports of more than $688 million in mail-theft related check fraud, finding that 44 percent of checks stolen from the mail were altered and deposited; 26 percent were used as a template to create other counterfeit checksl and 20 percent were fraudulently signed and deposited, accoring to a September 2024 release from the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network.

Meanwhile, suspicious activity reports related to check fraud grew by nearly 140 percent between 2019 and 2022, according to a 2023 report from the Thomson Reuters Institute. There were 285,716 such reports in 2019. By 2022, the figure had ballooned to 683,541.

“Criminals increasingly targeted U.S. mail carriers during the COVID-19 pandemic,” the report said, noting that robbers often stole personal checks, business checks, tax refund checks and government checks such as Social Security and unemployment benefits.

“The act of stealing the check and cashing it is just the first criminal thing in a really long, long, long chain of events that victims will be taken for,” Maimon, of Georgia State University, explained.

Maimon, who is also head of fraud insights at SentiLink, a fraud software company for financial institutions, said he saw the problem of mail theft first spike in late 2021 and early 2022, when he conservatively estimated stolen checks totaled in the low eight figures per month. Now it’s close to $100 million per month.

“All the banks are bleeding at this point,” Maimon said. “The criminals are using identities in order to apply for benefits they do not deserve, so the government will start losing money, and they are losing money because we're seeing the criminals taking the identities and applying for tax benefits, tax refunds on behalf of the victims. Everybody's losing.”

Block argued that the theft of personally identifiable information from the mail is “infinitesimal,” and postal customers generally shouldn’t be worried about having their personal information stolen from the mail.

But the Postal Inspection Service does consider check washing — the act of altering information on a stolen check in order to commit fraud — “a big deal,” Block said. The Postal Inspection Service recovers $1 billion in counterfeit checks and money orders each year, according to its website. Postal Inspectors work with bank investigators and use tools to hunt these criminals.

Thieves posted a photo in February from a mail heist Thieves posted a photo in February from a mail heist in Upper Marlboro, Md., on the dark web, which was obtained by the Evidence-based Cybersecurity Research Group at Georgia State University. The researchers crossed out personal information. (Photo courtesy of David Maimon)

How bad have financial crimes via mail theft become?

Rep. Ken Calvert (R-CA) — who is co-sponsoring legislation to increase penalties for mail crimes — lost nearly $10,000 due to mail theft in October, Raw Story first reported.

A thief stole from the mail a $3,000 check from the campaign of then-House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) in July 2023.

“We definitely need better protection of our mail in order to make sure that this does not continue, but in addition to that, we need to find a way to prevent USPS customers’ identities from being stolen, being used for other nefarious reasons,” Maimon said.

Where are the postal police?

In August 2020, as the COVID-19 pandemic raged and the Postal Service’s finances deteriorated, postal leaders made a fateful decision.

David Bowers, deputy chief inspector for the Postal Inspection Service, decreed that postal police officers would no longer be assigned to street patrol. Instead, officers would be stationed only on “real property” — “land and buildings owned, occupied or otherwise controlled by the United States Postal service,” according to a 2020 internal document from a talk given to postal police officers and shared with Raw Story.

Postal police officers previously could patrol high crime areas in neighborhoods and make arrests if they witnessed a crime on the streets.

That’s no longer the case. Today, postal police officers are effectively banned from policing the streets where mail carriers make their rounds and most mail theft occurs.

“Effective immediately, any off property responses to robberies, physical assaults, mail theft or other postal related crimes are prohibited,” the 2020 internal document said.

“They reinterpreted the statute … and basically benched us, which was crazy because that's exactly when postal-related crimes started to rise, and now it's spreading like wildfire across America,” said Frank Albergo, president of the Postal Police Officers Association.

Already, the number of postal police officers had been steadily declining.

In 1974, the federal government employed 2,648 postal police officers. As of 2023, there were 450, according to Albergo, which includes lieutenants and sergeants. The U.S. Postal Service’s Office of the Inspector General said there were 348 active postal police officers with the bargaining unit, as of April 2023.

Postal police officers are located in 20 cities but used to be in as many as 66 in the 1970s and 1980s, Albergo said.

postal police officer A postal police officer stands on a corner in Detroit. (Photo courtesy of the Postal Police Officers Association)

The number of postal inspectors has been shrinking, too, but not nearly as much. Postal inspectors decreased from 1,755 in 1974 to 1,259 in 2023, Albergo said.

The main difference between postal inspectors and postal police officers is that inspectors “develop cases and prevent crime while protecting the American public,” where the officers “ensure the security of high-value deliveries, property and postal buildings,” the Postal Inspection Service’s website said.

An appropriate analogy is that postal police officers are like patrol officers and inspectors are like detectives, two postal employees told Raw Story. Postal police officers wear uniforms and drive in marked vehicles, where inspectors are often in plain clothes and unmarked cars.

The Postal Service isn’t the only federal agency to have its only police force — dozens of agencies such as the U.S. National Park Service and Amtrak have their own police.

Until the last decade, most criminals would never dare touch a letter carrier and showed more respect toward postal employees, Norris and Julion concurred.

After all, letter carriers are employees of the U.S. government, and committing a crime involving the mail is a federal felony offense.

“They wouldn't assault us. That was like a big no-no for them,” Norris said. “The community knew you just don't mess with the mailman or mail lady.”

Legal tug-of-war between the postal service and union

The Postal Service said the “legal jurisdiction” for postal police officers did not change in 2020 as a part of the statute reinterpretation, acknowledging that some divisions used to use the police officers off-property, according to Michael Martel, a postal inspector and national public information officer for the United States Postal Inspection Service.

Questions were raised about “whether these patrols conformed to the law and whether they were effective,” Martel told Raw Story via email.

This led to the Postal Inspection Service deciding to “comprehensively curtail” the use of postal police officers “outside the immediate environs of Postal Service real property,” which it says was necessary to protect the officers and Postal Service “more broadly from legal liability,“ Martel said.

In 2020 a federal court dismissed a lawsuit from the Postal Police Officers Association against the Postal Service calling the statute in question “ambiguous” and saying the Postal Service “did not act unreasonably” in its reinterpretation of the statute.

Postal inspectors, not postal police, are responsible for “off-site protection of the mail and our letter carriers” and “regularly conduct surveillance and appropriate enforcement actions in areas where high numbers of letter carrier robberies and mail thefts have been reported,” Martel said.

But in January 2021, an arbitrator determined that postal police officers’ duties are “very similar to the vast majority of patrol police officers’ duties" and awarded the officers a two-grade salary increase, with raises totaling about $1,700.

“The Postal Service retaliated by eliminating our authority to perform those duties, but obviously, this doesn't make sense because they had already paid for those duties,” Albergo said.

The Postal Service "remains confident in its position" that the law enforcement authority for postal police officers is "limited to postal premises under the law, and no court or arbitrator has disagreed with that conclusion," said David Walton, a spokesperson for the Postal Service, in a statement to Raw Story.

A second arbitration came in 2023, determining that postal police officers have some jurisdiction outside of postal properties and that postal police officers are to be governed by the handbook, not the 2020 memo. However, the arbitrator made clear that "nothing in this award should be construed" as requiring the Postal Service to deploy postal police officers away from postal "real property."

Of postal police officers’ current responsibilities, Block said, they “include physical security at our larger postal plants,” providing a “visible presence in marked cars” and doing station visits at local post offices.

The Postal Inspection Service’s website emphasizes that postal police officers are “a crucial part of the Inspection Service team.”

“Stationed in postal facilities across the nation, they stand on the frontlines in the fight to protect postal employees, customers and property,” the website said.

“What good are they just guarding facilities? I mean, really, playing like flashlight cops to facilities and literally after-hours checking to make sure the gate is locked and stuff like that?” Julion said.

A 2017 postal police officer job description shared with Raw Story includes responsibilities such as responding to “emergency situations (e.g., burglaries, robberies, natural disasters, medical emergencies, Postal Service vehicle accidents)” and enhancing the Postal Inspection Service’s “community policing, crime prevention and security efforts,” which includes acting as a “visible deterrent to criminal attack.”

In February 2024, a federal court upheld the 2023 arbitration, denying the Postal Service’s motion to dismiss. Albergo called the ruling a “win,” but there’s still been no change in postal police officers’ ability to work off-property, and Albergo said he expects continued resistance.

“This is not about our law enforcement authority. This is not about protecting letter carriers or protecting the mail,” Albergo said. “This is about the Postal Service beating the smallest postal union in a labor dispute. That apparently is more important to them than protecting the sanctity of the mail and the safety of letter carriers.”

The Postal Service disagreed, saying the recent district court decision "did not express a contrary view, but instead merely returned a matter to an arbitrator to obtain clarification of his award, which we believe will be construed favorably to the Postal Service," Walton said.

A separate class action suit was filed against Postmaster General Louis DeJoy in January 2024, alleging that DeJoy “discriminated against Black and Hispanic postal police officers by failing to provide them with the same access to the Postal Service’s Self-Referral Counseling Program as postal inspectors.” Albergo said at least 80 percent of postal police officers are “black and brown.”

What is the Postal Service doing to curb crime against letter carriers?

DeJoy, the postmaster general, insists that the Postal Service is protecting its letter carriers, particularly with its new “Project Safe Delivery” program aimed at reducing mail crimes with enhanced security for its collection boxes and postal locks.

“We have been unrelenting in our pursuit of criminals who target postal employees and the U.S. Mail,” said DeJoy in a March 2024 press release. “We will continue to make major investments to secure the postal network while directing the full weight of our law enforcement resources to protecting our employees and the mail.”

The program includes the replacement of 49,000 antiquated arrow keys, according to a May 2023 press release.

However that’s just 0.5 percent of 9 million arrow keys overall — in other words, only one out of every 200 arrow keys will be replaced.

A full mailbox locking modernization program would cost more than $2.6 billion in hardware alone, according to an estimate contained in the Office of the Inspector General’s report.

The program also includes the installation of 12,000 high-security blue collection boxes through fiscal year 2024 in “high security risk areas,” the 2023 release said.

To date, more than 15,000 new high-security blue collection boxes have been replaced, along modernizing with 28,000 antiquated arrow locks" using electronic mechanisms, "with more to come," Walton said.

“As we devalue those postal keys and other postal property, we would think that criminals would move on to some other avenue away from the Postal Service,” Block said.

Letter carriers say the modernization is long overdue as the arrow key technology dates back to the 1950s, Julion said, calling the keys “antiquated at best.” Adapting fob technology similar to what’s used in hotels would be ideal, he said.

As for criminal investigations, in fiscal year 2022, the Postal Inspection Service handled 5,499 cases, which led to 4,291 arrests and 3,947 convictions, according to its annual report.

That’s less than a third of the arrests the Postal Inspection Service made at its peak in 1992, with 14,578 that year, according to research published by the State University of New York at Albany. In 1992, the population of the United States stood at 255.4 million — about 80 million people less than the nation’s current population, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

Postal Inspection Service arrests were greater than 10,000 each year between 1988 and 2005.

The Postal Inspection Service reported more than 1,200 arrests for letter carrier robberies and mail theft since May 2023. In the past five months, letter carrier robberies decreased by 19 percent, and mail theft complaints fell by 34 percent, the March 2024 release said.

The Postal Service also reported making 73 percent more arrests for letter carrier robberies than it did in the same time period last year, according to the March 2024 press release.

Still, the Postal Inspection Service must constantly “adapt as criminals adapt” and accept the limitations that it can’t stop every criminal, Block said.

“We're not able to be everywhere at once and also conduct criminal investigations,” Block said. “We're not a protective force. We're here as an investigative body.”

“There aren't enough postal inspectors to provide every letter carrier with around the clock protection, just as there aren't enough police officers in any city across the country to provide around the clock protection to citizens,” Block continued.

Block said lots is happening behind the scenes to keep employees safe as well.

That includes “stand-up” or “service” talks with letter carriers from postal inspectors like Block about what to do to stay safe when out on their routes. Advice often includes warning letter carriers to be aware of their surroundings, to note anything unusual on their routes and to be vigilant, he said.

“Robberies or attacking letter carriers, that's an unfortunate thing that has increased over the last few years,” Block said.

The Postal Inspection Service increased its staffing to address the increased attacks and is providing more education in case a letter carrier experiences a crime while delivering, Block said. The agency has also done a “really good job at making ourselves known to postal employees and how they can get in contact with us,” Block said, noting that there’s a 24/7 hotline both postal employees and customers can call if there’s danger (877-876-2455).

“If you do, unfortunately, end up in a situation where you become a robbery victim or a victim of some other crime while conducting your responsibilities, then the most important thing aside from trying to guarantee your safety is to be a good witness, to remember the things that could serve us well in an investigation to try and find these people and bring them to justice,” Block said.

With legislation, is it likely ‘common sense will prevail’?

Mail theft and crimes against letter carriers has grabbed the attention of lawmakers and government agencies.

Chuck Young, a spokesperson for the U.S. Government Accountability Office, told Raw Story that his agency was investigating the Postal Inspection Service’s postal inspectors and postal police officers.

The report would focus on “the extent and nature of crimes against postal employees and property” and the responsibilities of postal inspectors and postal police “in addressing serious crimes against postal employees and property” — along with the adequacy of the Postal Inspection Service’s processes, Young told Raw Story via email.

Released in June, the report found that “serious crime” — including homicides, assaults, burglaries and robberies — nearly doubled during a six-year span, from 656 in 2017 to 1,198 in 2023. Robberies alone grew nearly sevenfold between fiscal years 2019 through 2023, according to the report.

Albergo said he hopes “common sense will prevail,” and the report will spur Congress to act.

There are currently three bills in Congress that are pushing to restore postal police officers’ off-property duties, two called the Postal Police Reform Act. The latest, the Protect our Letter Carriers Act, was introduced in March.

Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA) and Greg Landsman (D-OH) introduced the Protect our Letter Carriers Act, calling for more severe punishment for those who assault letter carriers and replacing outdated mailboxes and arrow keys.

“The increasing amount of robberies and assaults against letter carriers is highly concerning and ensuring their safety must be properly addressed by Congress,” Fitzpatrick told Raw Story in a statement. “We must step in to ensure that proper oversight is conducted and the resources our letter carriers need for safety are accessible.”

The House version of the Postal Police Reform Act was reintroduced in May 2023 by Rep. Andrew Garbarino (R-NY). Reps. Calvert and Bill Pascrell (D-NJ), along with Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC), co-sponsored the bill.

Pascrell called DeJoy's tenure as postmaster general "catastrophic," and said postal employees "have been plunged into existential danger."

"Postal Police Officers are being blocked from protecting postal employees and property, leading to a spike in theft of property and frightening assaults against letter carriers. This is an absolute disgrace," Pascrell told Raw Story in a statement. "Postal employees must be shielded to go about their business. Our commonsense legislation would let brave postal police do their jobs without interference. USPS can only remain a national crown jewel when its employees’ safety and Americans’ property both are fully protected."

Sens. Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Susan Collins (R-ME) introduced the Senate bill in November 2023, which has been referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Other co-sponsors of the bill include Sens. Jerry Moran (R-KS), Ben Cardin (D-MD), Sherrod Brown (D-OH), Ron Wyden (D-OR), John Hickenlooper (D-CO), Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), Chris Coons (D-DE), Tim Kaine (D-VA), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV) and Angus King (I-ME).

Durbin, for one, expressed frustration.

“Letter carriers perform an essential service of our government, but delivering mail has become an increasingly dangerous job. It’s shameful that Postmaster General Louis DeJoy continues to turn a blind eye to the rampant and violent crimes against his employees,” said Durbin in a statement to Raw Story. “No letter carrier should be worried about being robbed at gunpoint while on their route, which I’ve reminded Postmaster General DeJoy through numerous letters on the issue.”

So, too, did Cortez Masto, who specifically blamed DeJoy, a nominee of former President Donald Trump, who has led a postal service cost-cutting and restructuring effort since becoming postmaster general.

“This bipartisan bill reverses Postmaster General DeJoy’s dangerous rule limiting postal police officers’ jurisdiction and will help combat an unacceptable increase in attacks on letter carriers across the country,” Cortez Masto told Raw Story in a statement. “I’ll keep working to pass this bill and make sure postal workers can continue to safely deliver the prescriptions, checks and other necessities Nevadans rely on.”

When introducing the bill, Wyden said Congress would have to step up if DeJoy didn’t respond to the increase in crime.

“For over 200 years the United States Postal Service has been a central fixture of the American government. The recent cases of mail theft and the alarming uptick in assaults against postal workers is unacceptable,” Wyden said in a statement. “If Postmaster DeJoy refuses to act, Congress must do everything it can to improve protections for these essential workers.”

Brown told Raw Story that mail theft has affected “too many Ohioans" and "too many postal workers face threats on the job." He wrote letters to DeJoy and Inspector General Whitcomb Hull in 2022 about rising postal robberies, and after receiving no response, he wrote to the Postal Service's Board of Governors, too.

"Postal robberies and mail theft are federal crimes, and the responsibility to protect postal workers and their mail should not be pushed onto overwhelmed local law enforcement personnel across Ohio," Brown said in a statement. "Since Postmaster General Louis DeJoy has limited Postal Police Officers’ ability to do their jobs, this bill is necessary to empower the Postal Police to keep our postal workers safe and ensure Ohioans receive their mail.”

Duckworth said rising violence and crime against letter carriers in Illinois is "deeply troubling," and they should feel "safe and protected on the job without worrying their safety could be threatened at any moment," particularly when doing essential work that provides necessities to veterans, small businesses and seniors.

Duckworth said she co-sponsored the bill to "counter Postmaster General DeJoy’s reckless changes that restricted Postal Police Officers to USPS properties."

"This bill would help maximize USPS resources and help ensure these officers can better protect our letter carriers along their routes," Duckworth said. "The success of USPS depends on the ability of letter carriers to carry out their duties safely, quickly and accurately, and I will continue working with my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to pass this important legislation to support them in that mission.”

Norton, Moran and Kaine were unavailable for an interview, and all other members of Congress did not respond to Raw Story’s questions.

‘Get back to me’: Supporting letter carrier safety

Norris’ attack in January 2023 wasn’t the first time she witnessed violence in the job as a letter carrier. In 2011, she was caught in the crossfire of a drive-by shooting.

“No sooner than I started ducking, ‘pow pow pow pow,’ a barrage of bullets, gunfire,” Norris said. “It was over like 20 to 30 shots. A young man that was on the corner did die. I had to slide up under a truck for safety, and I just laid there and the gunshots stopped.”

At the time, Norris said her supervisor pushed her to finish her route that day, until her union representative stepped in. With her most recent attack, Norris said the Postal Service was more supportive, but she still feels “a bit of hurt” toward postal inspectors.

After Norris’ attack in January 2023, she didn’t return to work until the first week of May, but she was paid during that time.

“They robbed me sociably. I couldn't work. I didn’t want to be around anyone,” Norris said. “I isolated myself sociably. I didn't go to anything. No weddings, no grocery store, no parties. I became a loner. I went through a depressive stage. I stayed in the house, so they took more from me than just that key.”

Norris said she skipped her grandson’s birthday trip to Disney World last year as she was still depressed from the incident.

Workers’ compensation covered Norris’ bills for a psychiatrist, who she still continues to see today.

When Norris returned to work, her psychiatrist recommended she work inside a postal facility because of her fears of delivering mail on the streets — particularly in the winter when people are more often wearing masks.

She is fearful for her son, too, who has himself worked as a letter carrier for seven years. Norris said she calls him at least three times a day to make sure he’s safe.

“It really irks me that I can't go out there and protect them because I was once one of them,” said Barber, a postal police officer who previously worked as a letter carrier in downtown Chicago for 12 years. “At heart, I still am.”

Norris gradually worked her way up from four-hour shifts back to full-time hours, but she’s still working inside. As a self-described “people person,” Norris said she misses her customers and the peace that mail delivering used to bring her.

No arrests have been made in relation to the January 2023 attack, Block said. Lack of justice is one of the biggest concerns for Foster, the president of the Chicago branch of the National Association of Letter Carriers.

Khalalisa NorrisKhalalisa Norris stands on the sidewalk outside a post office in Oak Park, Ill. She has worked inside a postal facility since she was assaulted in 2023 and hopes to return to her mail route soon. (Photo by Alexandria Jacobson/Raw Story)

“Just want to see more prosecutions, more foot patrol out there in any kind of way they can,” Foster said. “Saturate the areas where most of the crimes are coming from to protect their letter carriers so that they can see that something is being done.”

As for Norris, she hoped to return to her mail route in April or May — more than a year after her assault.

“I have to take my life back. I can't allow them to have me stuck here in this place,” Norris said. “It's still happening. They're still doing it, so for me it was like I need to know if this is something I can continue to do.”

September 23, 2024: This story has been with statistics from new reports released after publication.

Capitol Police alumni rally around Kamala Harris

CHICAGO — The Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol may be in the rearview for many Americans, but it’s remained a centerpiece of former President Donald Trump’s campaign — from his song with “the J6 choir” to him dubbing those federal convicts “hostages.”

And while the economy, immigration and war in the Middle East are also on the top of voter’s minds this cycle, some of the officers left scarred by the failed insurrectionists are combating Trump’s rhetoric by pounding the pavement in battleground states nationwide this election cycle.

ALSO READ: Donald Trump exploits AP photo error for new $99 'Save America' book

That includes one former officer who could soon find his way back to Congress — as an elected lawmaker.

“I've been out on the road for Vice President Harris, and I couldn't be happier,” former U.S. Capitol Police officer Harry Dunn told Raw Story while trekking through the crowded Democratic National Convention arena in Chicago as delegates praised his service and stopped him for selfies.

Dunn was one of a handful of officers who garnered headlines for testifying in front of the 117th Congress about the brutality, racism and abuse law enforcement officials endured at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

Earlier this year, Dunn lost a Democratic primary for an open Maryland congressional seat, but he says he feels at home in the party. Now, as a surrogate for Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris, a former prosecutor, Dunn has already been to Michigan and Wisconsin, and he’ll be traveling to North Carolina soon.

Other officers left scarred in the aftermath of the attack are also speaking out this election cycle, including Daniel Hodges, Michael Fanone and Aquilino Gonell, who recounted to the delegates gathered in Chicago his story of being brutalized by a pole with an American flag still waving from the other end.

ALSO READ: Inside the Democratic National Convention corporate moneyfest

As hard as it is to discuss trauma they endured that day, Dunn says there’s no quit in them.

“All the swing states. Us officers, we are out on the road,” Dunn said. “As long as Donald Trump is spewing lies about January 6, you're gonna find me and us pushing back against him.”

While they aren’t officially a part of the campaign, the Harris-Walz ticket covers Dunn’s travel expenses as he traverses the nation’s last remaining purple states between now and November.

“Do you worry about J6 being normalized?” Raw Story asked.

“Hell yeah. There's been no accountability for it, and the Supreme Court just basically just said ‘F— you, Donald Trump can do what he wants to do,’” Dunn said. “So what accountability? That's why on November 5th we have to get rid of them, because there's no more institutions left to save us. The calvary is the voters.”

ALSO READ: Why Kamala Harris may get a big convention polling ‘bounce’

Dunn and the other officers have allies, especially those lawmakers who still carry the trauma of that day with them.

“Do you worry about Jan. 6 being normalized?” Raw Story asked. “Like, on the House side of the Capitol they’ve been using the committees to defend them.”

“Yeah, I know,” Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) told Raw Story at Chicago’s United Center. “It's weird. But at the end of the day, there's not much he can do unless he gets elected. And every day it looks less and less like he's going to get elected, and the more he says this crazy stuff, the less likely he makes it.”

Whitehouse says the worse Trump looks in the polls, the more he’s been reviving his rhetoric about hundreds of his supporters serving out January 6-related prison stints.

ALSO READ: ‘Stop the Steal’ organizer hired by Trump campaign for Election 2024 endgame

“His grip on reality, I think, is slipping further, and what he knows is what he said before. And so as he flails around, he goes back to stuff that he said before, even if it makes no sense,” Whitehouse said. “He's not making sense right now. He's just singing familiar songs. It's like a ritual chanting. [Republicans] love their ritual chants.”

The attack on the Capitol has come up throughout the Democratic convention, but it proved to be a centerpiece of Wednesday night’s programming.

Convention-goers were shown video of officers being overwhelmed and assaulted at the Capitol before Gonell, a former Capitol Police sergeant, spoke on Capitol Police officer’s behalf.

And some members of the select Jan. 6 committee were also given prime speaking slots, including its former chair Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MS).

Thompson says Trump’s rhetoric is beyond troubling.

“That's one of the reasons we got to defeat him and not let him get back there,” Thompson told Raw Story while walking through the convention hall in Chicago. “Because that kind of behavior under him will become the norm and we could very well have a situation that's even worse.”

While these lawmakers and officers aren’t surprised Trump has tripled down on his J6 rhetoric this election, they’re also prepared to correct the record for the American people.

“That's who he is. That's why the choice for this election couldn’t be more clear,” Dunn said. “He’s already said he doesn't know if he's gonna accept the results of it, so he's already planting those seeds. He’s planting the seeds for Jan. 6 to happen again.”

“Harris, because she's VP, should she not certify it if he wins?” Raw Story asked.

“No. The Democrats, we follow the rules,” Dunn told Raw Story. “But we're not gonna speak that into existence. Kamala Harris is gonna win this thing. That’s it.”

Nazi infiltrators lurk at Democratic National Convention protests

CHICAGO — While hundreds of hard left, pro-Palestine activists faced off against Chicago police officers in riot gear outside the Israeli consulate on Tuesday night, agents of chaos lurked nearby.

Nazis and white nationalist provocateurs tailed the protest, along with right-wing media performers seeking potentially violent content for MAGA audiences that support Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump.

One of the Nazi provocateurs, a woman with purple hair identified by her LinkedIn profile as Rachel Siegel, drew immediate attention before the protest by unfurling a banner before the start of the protest that read, “Stop white replacement. Deport them all.”

ALSO READ: Inside the Democratic National Convention corporate moneyfest

After the police arrested several pro-Palestine protesters by wading into the crowd and grabbing them — sometimes with nightsticks swinging — Siegel stood with a group of right-leaning onlookers observing as uniformed officers led the zip-tied activists into the back of a prisoner wagon.

An unidentified, left-wing woman confronted the group.

“You can shut the f--- up, white supremacist,” she said.

Siegel called the woman a “fat b----” and covered her mouth to stifle a laugh.

“Is that all you have to say?” the left-wing woman asked.

“Filthy old f-----,” Siegel rejoined, and then threw up a straight-arm Hitler salute, waving her arm slightly as if to turn the military salute into a light-hearted gesture of mockery.

One of the right-wing men standing nearby taunted the left-wing woman.

“Blame white people for all your problems,” he said.

“Yeah, blame white people for all your stupid, insignificant problems,” Siegel agreed.

The others in the right-wing group mostly avoided any overt gestures of support for white supremacy, giving them a thin shroud of plausible deniability.

When another woman confronted the man about “hanging out with a literal fascist who hates Jews,” he protested that Siegel was just “making fun” of the pro-Palestine protesters.

Rachel Siegel gives a Hitler salute in response to a pro-Palestine protester calling her a white supremacist. (Jordan Green / Raw Story)

The provocateur playbook

The exchange here in Chicago’s streets illustrates the often murky circumstances surrounding Nazi provocateurs who insert themselves into left-wing protests, especially when they attempt to graft their antisemitism onto pro-Palestine protesters’ opposition to Israel’s war in Gaza.

And while pro-Palestine protesters often let Nazis know they’re not welcome, the aim by the more militant left-wing faction to cause maximum disruption to the Democratic National Convention means they don’t always have much bandwidth to police their own ranks.

The protest, organized by a group called Behind Enemy Lines — a militant alternative to the more moderate Coalition to March on the DNC — named the protest outside the Israeli consulate “Make it great like ’68.”

The term is a direct nod to the troubled legacy of the 1968 Democratic Convention in Chicago, when street violence marred the city and doomed the Democratic Party’s prospects ahead of that year’s general election.

ALSO READ: ‘Stop the Steal’ organizer hired by Trump campaign for Election 2024 endgame

“We’re here to make it great like ’68,” one of the protest leaders shouted, as rows of Chicago police flanked the protesters at either end of the 500 block of Madison Street. “In 1968, thousands of people marched on the DNC. Thousands of people made history.”

That 1968 is historic isn’t in dispute. But the allegory today’s anti-war protesters are making doesn’t foreshadow a promising outcome. That year, Republican Richard Nixon won the presidency, which led to an expansion of the war in Vietnam, which would drag on for another seven years.

What these protesters think about that is unclear: Two protesters approached by Raw Story curtly declined to talk.

Separately, a protest leader expressed frustration with “the failure of the left to mount any offensive against this bullshit, to mount any offensive against these pigs.” The goal, he suggested, was not to sway Vice President Kamala Harris to adopt a more even-handed policy on Israel and Palestine, but to “bring the war home.”

“Make the DNC feel what Gaza feels,” he raged. “The f---ing empire has got to burn to the ground.”

Militant pro-Palestine protesters gather in front of the Israeli consulate on Tuesday. (Jordan Green / Raw Story)

The militant, far-left insistence on tearing down the system or entertaining support for a third-party spoiler candidate — as they did when they listened to Green Party nominee Jill Stein at Chicago’s Union Park on Wednesday — creates a magnet for far-right provocateurs looking for openings to inject their ideas into the national discourse.

“White nationalists have a long history of inserting themselves into left-wing spaces in an attempt to provoke conflict and also gain media attention,” Stephen Piggott, a director at the Bridging Divides Initiative dedicated to tracking and mitigating political violence, told Raw Story. “Their presence at the DNC is just the latest example of this tactic.”

‘Get AIDS and die!’

For all the shouting and scuffling, the pro-Palestine protests this week have created minimal disruption for the convention itself.

The protest outside the Israeli consulate on Tuesday took place about two miles from the United Center and likely made next to zero impression on Democratic delegates participating that hour in a ceremonial roll call to nominate Kamala Harris for president.

During a march on Monday, protesters briefly removed a section of security fencing on the outer perimeter, but police officers — there are thousands of law enforcement officials patrolling and guarding the convention facilities — quickly responded and sealed the breach. Other protests throughout the week have remained largely peaceful.

ALSO READ: ‘Absolutely essential’: Son of Oath Keeper Stewart Rhodes is all in for Kamala Harris

That hasn’t stopped Nazis and other far-right activists from nevertheless using the protests to seek attention for themselves.

Siegel, the Nazi who threw up a Hitler salute on Tuesday night, had strolled around Union Park on Monday holding a cardboard sign with messaging lifted from the most vile, abjectly racist, antisemitic and homophobic corners of the internet.

The incendiary slogans on the sign included, “Jews f--- off,” “F--- n------,” and, “F—s eat s---. Get AIDS and die!”

Siegel explained to a reporter that her presence at the protest was meant as a response to both the pro-Palestine protesters’ insistence that Americans care about the suffering in Gaza and a “globalist, interventionist agenda” that sustains U.S. support for Israel.

“I see that this is kind of like an insult to being an American and being an insult to being proud of who you are and having integrity in your nation,” she told a reporter, referring to the pro-Palestine protest. "And I feel personally as a white person that things are kind of getting out of hand for my race. I feel that things are kind of going down the toilet. I feel that we are not being taken seriously as individuals of this nation.”

By Wednesday, the ranks of oddball far-right provocateurs at the pro-Palestine protest at Union Park had expanded to more than a dozen, including one man who carried a swastika flag. While their ideological signaling may have varied, they demonstrated a common affinity for trolling leftists by mingling with one another.

One faction included three men who paraded around with a National Bolshevism flag representing an ideology that blends Nazism with Bolshevism, a political ideology inspired by the communist government of the 1917 Russian revolution.

Paul, one of the men who would only identify himself by his first name, said none of them were actually National Bolsheviks. “It’s a meme ideology,” he said. “I don’t take it seriously.

They were joined by a group of young men from New Frontier, which openly supports fascism and excludes Jews. The five men followed Williams around the park as he carried an American flag.

Williams, who is Black, confronted protesters wearing kaffiyehs — scarves that represent Palestinian national pride — and T-shirts displaying the Palestinian flag.

“America first,” he said. “Put your nation and your people first…. My nation, and my people first.”

Some of the protesters were visibly angered by Williams, and a Black protester called him a “disgrace.” A speaker from the stage urged protesters to not engage with Williams, and eventually, the police escorted him away from the rally.

Nick Sortor, a right-wing video journalist who has been interviewed by Tucker Carlson and Tim Pool, quickly circulated a video clip of the confrontation to his nearly 500,000 followers on X that cast the protesters as unpatriotic.

“NOW: This Army veteran is being HARASSED by ‘protestors’ at Union Park in Chicago simply for flying an American flag and saying ‘America First,” Sortor’s post reads. “These people aren’t just anti-Israel. They’re ANTI-AMERICA.”

Making the issue of Nazi provocateurs even more murky, some Nazis have claimed that Siegel is a Jew, notwithstanding the fact that her sign on Monday included the invective, ‘F— off Jews.”

The banner that Siegel displayed promoting the false Great Replacement conspiracy theory included an address for a Telegram channel of a white supremacist group that calls itself “White Lives Matter.”

On Wednesday morning, the white supremacist group disavowed Siegel. A post on the channel read: “You will never see a jew throwing a roman salute at a legit WLM event. We have no clue who Rachel Siegel is, nor have we ever engaged with her.”

Siegel told Raw Story that she’s Persian-Russian, and not Jewish.

“That’s false,” she said. “Absolute smear campaign.”

- YouTubewww.youtube.com