All posts tagged "ruben gallego"

'A Trump statue?' Senator fears Lincoln Memorial could be target after White House rebuild

WASHINGTON — Some Democrats don’t think it’s a coincidence that President Donald Trump ordered the razing of the East Wing of the White House in the midst of the second-longest government shutdown in U.S. history.

“How do you make sure he doesn’t do this to other monuments?” Raw Story asked.

“I think this is the point for what's happening right now,” Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) said.

“This is why the erosion of the checks and balances is so dangerous and why having Republicans who are willing to bend over backwards to do whatever he wants is really undermining what our framers intended.

“They did not want a president to be able to do whatever he wants.”

Booker’s not alone.

“The man has no respect for institutions, for democracy, for anything,” Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) told Raw Story. “So it would not surprise me if he did go after some of our most beautiful historic sites in this country.”

“How do you combat that?” Raw Story pressed.

As elevator doors shut on him, Gallego shrugged.

Other Democrats are also shrugging, even as most all are also braced for more to come.

‘Where the hell are my Republican colleagues?’

Democrats are feeling powerless on Capitol Hill, and not just because Trump has refused to negotiate since the government shut down 29 days ago.

“With what Trump did to the East Wing,” Raw Story asked, “are you worried he might start doing a facelift on other monuments?”

“You think he might…take down the president's statue at the Lincoln Memorial and replace it with a Donald Trump statue? I guess everything's possible,” Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) said.

“This is why you used to have laws and a certain ability to review things. I think it's a very real possibility. Only thing I'd ask is, where the hell are my Republican colleagues?”

For their part, Republicans are shrugging off the controversy. Once again with Trump, they just don’t see the problem.

"I don't,” Sen. Jim Banks (R-IN) told Raw Story. “And I've tried to understand the faux outrage over it. So I dug into it, studied it.”

Like others in the GOP, Banks argues Trump’s blueprint for a massive new ballroom where the East Wing once stood “seems like a significant improvement to the White House.”

“The fake outrage over it makes it sound like they're tearing down like the historic West Wing rooms," Banks said. "The White House is going to be more beautiful than it's ever been when they're done with it.

“Whether you love President Trump, like I do, or you hate him, I mean, nobody can deny that this guy has a talent for construction and development and creating beautiful buildings and places.”

It’s not just Republicans. Some Democrats aren’t paying attention to the destruction of the East Wing.

“I would worry about it, but my list of things I'm worrying about, that's not in the top five,” Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA) told Raw Story.

This week, Kaine’s been busy leading the charge against the Trump administration’s tariff battles with Canada and Brazil.

The Virginian is also advancing efforts to end the shutdown and get paychecks flowing again to the federal workers and contractors across his state, which is home to thousands of government workers.

Kaine’s also once again been one of the loudest voices in Congress demanding lawmakers vote on whether or not to authorize the use of military force — known as an AUMF — against alleged drug cartel activity in the Caribbean and the Pacific.

Compared to the unilateral killing of suspected drug smugglers, Kaine says the razing of the East Room just hasn’t made his plate.

“It's an embarrassment,” Kaine said. “And yet, you know, the ballroom, at least, is not killing people.”

‘One of those moments’

With the GOP holding all the levers of power in Washington, other Democrats are leaning in on their Republican colleagues, trying to pressure them to conduct basic oversight of the Trump administration.

“They control the House and the Senate,” Booker said. “Until they are willing to speak up, we're going to see erosions and attacks on our history, on our heritage, on the way we do things that have been constructive for years in protecting a lot of our common values and virtues.”

That has Democrats like Booker gearing up for next year’s midterm elections.

“It's going to be the biggest time for Americans to say what the polls reflect, as they do not support what the president is doing,” Booker said.

“This is one of those moments where we're still a democracy, the power of the people is still greater than the people in power.

“We all, as Americans, have a right to speak up, and hopefully, especially Republicans — who have the power to do something, to hold hearings, to provide checks and balances — will start taking their jobs seriously.”

Outside spending in 2024 federal election tops $1 billion

This article originally appeared in OpenSecrets. Sign up for their weekly newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox.

Outside spending in the 2024 election cycle has surpassed $1 billion, outpacing prior election cycles, according to a new OpenSecrets analysis of federal campaign finance reports.

Super PACs and other outside groups that can raise and spend unlimited sums of money have poured about $1.1 billion into 2024 federal elections as of Aug. 15 — nearly twice what similar groups spent over the same period in the 2020 presidential election cycle when independent expenditures hit an all-time record.


More than half of all outside spending during the 2024 cycle — about $585.8 million — has gone into the presidential election, which saw an especially expensive Republican presidential nominating contest.

SFA Fund and Never Back Down, the main super PACs aligned with former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, respectively, sank a combined $119.6 million on independent expenditures during the Republican presidential primary.

ALSO READ: Donald Trump deep in debt while foreign money keeps coming: disclosure

However, the largest spender, by far, is former President Donald Trump’s flagship super PAC, Make America Great Again Inc. To date, MAGA Inc. has spent about $125.1 million boosting Trump in the presidential election, including nearly $33.2 million attacking his GOP rivals and more than $65.6 million opposing President Joe Biden.

Future Forward and American Bridge 21st Century, the first and second-largest Democratic hybrid PACs, have spent a combined $74.7 million on the presidential race as of Aug. 15. Both super PACs pivoted to supporting Vice President Kamala Harris after Biden suspended his campaign last month.

Outside spending slowed after Haley, Trump’s last-remaining Republican challenger, bowed out of the presidential race in March. But independent expenditures continue to outpace previous election cycles.

Congressional races have also attracted millions in outside spending.


Americans for Prosperity Action, a super PAC at the center of a network of conservative donors and activists led by billionaire Charles Koch, spent more than $31.2 million supporting Haley. After she suspended her campaign, AFP Action, which hasn’t endorsed Trump, pivoted to congressional races, spending nearly $27.7 million to help Republicans hold onto the U.S. House and win back the Senate.

Another top spender is Fairshake, a super PAC established last year to prop up candidates it sees as friendly to the crypto industry. Fairshake and its affiliated super PACs, Protect Progress and Defend American Jobs, have spent a combined $45.7 million on elections in 2024 — more than any other industry-focused group.

Of that, nearly $10.1 million went toward defeating Democratic Rep. Katie Porter in California’s open primary election for the U.S. Senate. Porter, who questioned the crypto industry’s impact on the environment, finished a distant third behind Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and Republican Steve Garvey, a former professional baseball player.

Fairshake and its affiliated super PACs are slated to spend millions more on the general election in coming months. Earlier this month, Fairshake announced that it had reserved $25 million in TV advertising to support 18 House candidates — nine Democrats and nine Republicans. Politico also reported that Defend American Jobs intends to spend at least $12 million supporting Republican Bernie Moreno in his race against Senate Banking Chair Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), a longtime skeptic of the crypto industry. Democrats need to hold onto Brown’s seat to maintain their majority in the Senate.

ALSO READ: Sen. John Fetterman violates financial law with botched corporate bond disclosures

Meanwhile, Protect Progress is preparing to launch a pair of approximately $3 million ad campaigns supporting Reps. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) and Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) in their Senate races. Both lawmakers have voted for crypto industry-backed legislation in the House.

The crypto-focused super PACs’ largest donors include the digital asset firms Coinbase and Ripple, as well as the venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz.

United Democracy Project, a super PAC affiliated with the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, or AIPAC, has also poured millions into influencing 2024 elections. United Democracy Project has spent more than $35.6 million on congressional races this cycle, mostly on efforts to oust Democratic incumbents over their criticism of Israel’s military response to the Oct. 7 Hamas attack.

Last week, AIPAC-backed Wesley Bell, a county prosecutor, won the Democratic primary election in Missouri’s 1st Congressional District, defeating incumbent Rep. Cori Bush in the state’s most expensive nominating contest on record. United Democracy Project spent more than $8.6 million on the race, far more than any other outside group.

The AIPAC-affiliated super PAC also pushed out Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-N.Y.), who lost the Democratic primary election in New York's 16th Congressional District to George Latimer in June. United Democracy Project poured more than $14.6 million into the race.

Kari Lake foe Ruben Gallego broke financial transparency law with years-late stock filings

Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ), who is in the midst of a competitive U.S. Senate race against Republican election denier Kari Lake, appears to have violated federal financial disclosure law by reporting two transactions nearly two and five years late.

Gallego on Tuesday disclosed an August 2019 purchase of non-publicly traded stock in investment advisory, Aspiration Fund Adviser LLC, valued between $15,001 and $50,000.

Gallego also purchased corporate securities in pronunciation guide services company NameCoach Inc. in June 2022. This investment is also valued between $15,001 and $50,000.

Members of Congress are required to publicly report most purchases, sales and exchanges of stocks, bonds, commodity futures, securities and cryptocurrencies within 45 days of a transaction, as required by the 2012 law known as the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act.

"Rep. Gallego believes elected officials should be transparent and accountable to the people they represent, which is why he has co-sponsored legislation to clean up Washington and implement stricter disclosure requirements," said a spokesperson for Gallego, who declined to be named. "These investments were disclosed in previous filings and the recently filed report corrects inadvertent errors."

ALSO READ: Donald Trump deep in debt while foreign money keeps coming: disclosure

A Raw Story review of congressional financial records shows that the NameCoach transaction was disclosed on Gallego's 2022 annual report and on an amended version of the report filed Tuesday. The Aspiration Fund Adviser purchase was not disclosed on Gallego's 2019 annual report until Tuesday. The asset and investment agreement appeared on a 2021 annual report, but the report did not specifically note the Aug. 27, 2019 transaction.

Still, for such transactions, members of Congress also need to file a "periodic transaction report" — the formal name of a congressional financial disclosure for assets the STOCK Act mandates must be reported within 45 days of a transaction. Gallego did not appear to file any periodic transaction reports for either purchase.

Gallego co-sponsored the Ban Conflicted Trading Act and TRUST in Congress Act — both related to banning congressional stock trading. He also co-sponsored an anti-corruption reform bill, the For The People Act.

Gallego was first elected to Congress is 2014 and is now running for the U.S. Senate seat that will be vacated in January by Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ).

ALSO READ: Sen. John Fetterman violates financial law with botched corporate bond disclosures

His opponent, Lake, gained notoriety for her false claims of election fraud in the 2020 and 2022 elections. Lake lost her bid for Arizona governor to Democrat Katie Hobbs by less than one percentage point.

At present, Gallego is just shy of a 6 percent polling lead over Lake, according to The Hill.

Lake’s campaign did not immediately respond to Raw Story’s request for comment.

Another violator

Another member of Congress, Rep. Tom Kean, Jr. (R-NJ), appeared to be more than nine months late disclosing the September 2023 sale of an asset in New Jersey bank, Regal Bancorp, valued between $1,001 and $15,000, according to a new congressional financial filing.

A note on Kean Jr.’s Aug. 13 report said, “Former publicly traded company; filer took no action to initiate this trade; result of a corporate action."

Dan Scharfenberger, Kean Jr.'s chief of staff, emphasized to Raw Story that the line item is a "corporate transaction, not a stock transaction."

"The asset itself was disposed of through a corporate merger that Congressman Kean did not have any input or decision-making control over. As the compliance team has been preparing the congressman's annual personal financial disclosure report, they felt it would be best to over-report and file paperwork with the Ethics Committee on this matter," Scharfenberger said. "Congressman Kean continues to go above and beyond every legal standard to ensure full transparency."

The Senate and House Ethics committees have historically advised members of Congress to disclose investment transactions as the result of corporate decisions such as mergers and acquisitions, but there's often confusion on the exact requirements.

Kean Jr. previously violated the STOCK Act when he was as much as four months late disclosing six personal stock transactions, valued up to $90,000 total.

At the time, Kean Jr. told Raw Story via a September 2023 statement: “Upon taking office, I hired professionals to make certain that any and all transactions that I have control or interest in are reported accurately and quickly. However, this week, the attorney charged with overseeing my personal transaction reporting for the House shared with me that transactions from a family trust account, which I have no control over, were shared with him in an untimely fashion despite regular check-ins and confirmation of accurate reporting.”

Kean Jr. previously blasted STOCK Act violations from his 2022 opponent, Rep. Tom Malinowski, who he beat for his seat representing New Jersey’s 7th congressional district.

Malinowski, a Democrat, failed to properly disclose between $671,000 and $2.76 million in trades in 2020, with more than two dozen stock transactions taking place during the first several weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic. One stock sale in March 2020 involved shares of a medical-diagnostic company that made COVID-19 tests, Business Insider reported.

Kean Jr. supports a ban on members of Congress trading individual stocks, Scharfenberger said.

"He is leading by example as elected officials should always follow this model of transparency," Scharfenberger said. "Congressman Kean is also eager to move all of his stock and fund assets into a Qualified Blind Trust, and is working to diligently do so in consultation with the House Ethics Committee."Kean Jr. is running against Democrat Sue Altman this November.

Epidemic of violations

Four other members of Congress appeared to violate the STOCK Act in the past week, Raw Story reported.

Sens. John Fetterman (D-PA) and Bill Hagerty (R-TN), along with Reps. Stephanie Bice (R-OK) and Sean Casten (D-IL), all filed late disclosures.

Gallego joins Kean, Fetterman, Bice, Hagerty and Casten on a list of more than 50 members of the 118th Congress who Raw Story found to have violated the STOCK Act, mostly with late financial disclosures.

Other lawmakers have reported stock trades that potentially conflict with their official responsibilities, such as lawmakers who trade defense contractor stock while sitting on a congressional committee with defense oversight responsibilities.

Numerous bills have been introduced in recent years to effectively ban stock trading for members of Congress or increase the penalties for violations.

None have yet gotten a floor vote, and during the past three years, former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has been one of the biggest obstacles to previous stock ban bills advancing.

The latest progress toward a congressional stock trading ban came last month when the Ending Trading and Holdings in Congressional Stocks (ETHICS) Act advanced out of a Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs markup with an eight to four vote, with Republican senators divided on how to proceed.

The ETHICS Act proposes an immediate ban on members of Congress buying stocks and would prohibit them from selling stocks 90 days after enactment. Members’ spouses and dependent children would be prohibited from trading stocks starting in March 2027, which is when the president and vice president would also be required to divest from covered investments such as securities, commodities, futures, options and trusts.

Kari Lake earned a senator’s salary for talking and writing: documents

Kari Lake, the probable Republican candidate this year for the U.S. Senate in Arizona, made more money last year just from speaking and writing than she would make as a senator, according to Raw Story’s analysis of her most recent financial disclosure.

That’s $175,000 for Lake — and $174,000 for a U.S. senator.

Lake disclosed the specific terms of her book deal royalty agreement in an amended personal financial disclosure report filed Friday. She reported receiving a $100,000 advance, against 25 percent of net profits from sales, from her book “Unafraid,” released last June.

ALSO READ: 17 worthless things Trump will give you for your money

The Guardian described Lake’s book as a “grievance-packed audition in Lake’s tireless quest to be named [Donald] Trump’s running mate in 2024.”

The Daily Mail says Lake uses the book “to lay out her political manifesto and settle scores, all while describing how she made the move from much loved TV news anchor to one of the county's most divisive politicians.

Kari Lake's second amendment to her financial disclosure report for 2023 includes the terms of her book deal.

Lake’s book failed to reach the level of commercial success achieved by other MAGA-adjacent tomes, including those by members of the Trump family and a roster of Republican senators. The book is published by Winning Team Publishing, which was co-founded in 2021 by Donald Trump Jr.

Lake added the terms of her book deal — omitted in her amended February report and her original January report — as she prepares for Arizona’s July 30 primary.

ALSO READ: Trump-nominated FEC leader: let political donors hide their identities

Lake lost her only general election — for Arizona governor in 2022. She never conceded to Democrat Katie Hobbs after losing the race by more than 17,000 votes. Lake continues to deny the legitimacy of the election, despite losing multiple times in court on the issue.

During 2023, she commanded at least $5,000 — and as much as $15,000 — for each of seven speaking engagements she disclosed between March and September. Only one of the speeches was delivered in Arizona.

Kari Lake's paid speaking appearances in 2023. (Source: U.S. Senate Office of Public Records)

The Washington Post reported recently that Trump, the presumptive 2024 GOP presidential nominee, has soured on Lake’s prospects to win the Senate seat this year, despite writing a sunny foreword to her book. Trump has grumbled that Lake could be a drag on his presidential campaign in the key state of Arizona.

Lake’s campaign did not immediately respond to Raw Story’s request for comment.

Lake faces Democratic Rep. Ruben Gallego in November. Through March, the latest federal campaign finance report, Gallego had a substantial lead over Lake in fundraising.

Gallego’s campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ) announced in March that she would not seek reelection after leaving the Democratic Party. Polling showed her finishing third against Gallego and Lake in a three-way race that now will not happen because of Sinema’s departure.

Sinema’s fundraising continues to lag in contested Arizona Senate race

This article originally appeared in OpenSecrets. Sign up for their weekly newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox.

Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) raised over three times as much money as Sen. Krysten Sinema (I-Ariz.) last quarter in his bid to unseat the incumbent senator. He has inched closer to matching Sinema’s war chest each quarter since announcing his candidacy for Arizona’s Senate seat in January.

Sinema has yet to publicly announce her intent to run for reelection, but the former Democrat’s team has signaled that she is gearing up to run as an independent.

ALSO READ: Marjorie Taylor Greene declares war on Republicans

Republicans Kari Lake and Mark Lamb have also declared their candidacies. Lake, who unsuccessfully ran to be Arizona’s governor in 2022, is predicted to be the nominee by a recent GOP poll. Rumors swirled around Republican Blake Masters’ potential run earlier this year, but the venture capitalist, who lost a bid for the U.S. Senate in 2022, has decided to instead run for the U.S. House.

The likely three-way race between Sinema, Gallego and Lake appears to be favoring Gallego. Recent polls show him ahead in most matchups, with Sinema in a distant third. The Cook Political Report ranks the race a toss up.

Gallego, a five-term congressman, has been outraising Sinema all year and continued that trend last quarter, according to an OpenSecrets analysis of campaign finance reports.

Sinema raised $826,000 from July through September, half of what she raised from April through June. She spent most of it, keeping her cash on hand around $10.8 million dollars.

Gallego raised $3.1 million last quarter and spent $1.8 million. His campaign had $1.3 million at the beginning of the year and now has over $5 million.

Credit: OpenSecrets

Lamb ended September with $307,000. Lake launched her campaign after the third quarter ended, so details about her finances will first become available after the end of the fourth quarter early next year.

While Gallego received more money from individual donors, Sinema raised the most from political action committees from July through September. Most of the $175,000 in PAC money Sinema raised came from 55 groups affiliated with companies and interest groups. Sinema also received $10,000 from Sen. Joe Manchin’s (D-W.V.) leadership PAC, Country Roads PAC.

Gallego brought in $76,000 from PACs last quarter. About a third of it came from fellow Democrats through leadership PACs, local campaign committees and the Arizona Democratic Party. Most of the rest came from left-leaning interest groups and PACs affiliated with unions.

Indivisible Action, a liberal hybrid PAC, independently spent $13,700 opposing Sinema with digital ads and text messages.

ALSO READ: Trump tripped by 88 pages of contributions that ‘exceed federal limits’

Half of Gallego’s funds last quarter came from small donors who contributed $200 or less. Small donors made up less than 2% of Sinema’s funds during the same period.

The Sinema Leadership Fund, a joint fundraising committee that splits contributions between Sinema’s campaign committee and leadership PAC, solicits funds through the donation processor Democracy Engine. Despite the lack of an official announcement from Sinema, the group’s donation page explicitly asks for donations to “support the re-election of U.S. Senator Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona.” The joint fundraising committee directed $365,000 to Sinema’s campaign committee from July through September.

Sinema spent $263,000 on digital advertising last quarter. Gallego spent more than double on digital ad buys during the same period.

Lamb spent $15,000 on digital advertising and $12,800 on campaign attire. The Federal Election Commission sent a letter to Lamb following his third quarter report, asking him to clarify the clothing expenses and to ensure they do not constitute a personal expense, which campaign committees cannot pay for. Lamb’s response is due Nov. 24.

Sinema also received a letter from the FEC following her third quarter report, noting that over two dozen contributors gave more to the campaign than the maximum allowed by law. The funds must be reattributed to a different candidate or redesignated for a different election within two months. A response to the FEC is due Nov. 29.

OpenSecrets is a nonpartisan, independent and nonprofit research and news organization tracking money in U.S. politics and its effect on elections and public policy.

Why big-time politicians are surrendering gobs of campaign cash to an unlikely source

More than 30 federal political candidates and party committees have together surrendered at least $160,000 worth of donor dollars to the U.S. Marshals Service in recent weeks, according to a Raw Story analysis of federal campaign records.

It’s an all-but-unprecedented relinquishing of precious campaign cash to a government agency best known for hunting down suspected criminals, and even veteran election officials say they’ve never seen anything quite like it in U.S. politics.

But this isn’t any routine situation: Most of these “disgorgements” stem from contributions made by executives of bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange FTX, including former CEO Sam Bankman-Fried, Raw Story’s analysis indicates. And the Department of Justice is urging campaigns to give the money up.

“Based on our office's investigation, we have cause to believe these donations represent the proceeds of Bankman-Fried's crimes and accordingly are forfeitable under applicable provisions of the federal asset forfeiture statutes,” said a letter sent by the Department of Justice to a member of Congress’ campaign committee, which in turn shared its contents with Raw Story.

The letter continued, “It is the intent of this office to request any funds forfeited be made available to compensate the victims of Bankman-Fried's crimes pursuant to the Department of Justice's restoration and/or remission regulations."

Bankman-Fried faces 13 charges in federal court, including fraud, breaking campaign finance laws and violating the Foreign Corrupt Business Practices Act with an alleged $40 million bribe to Chinese authorities. The FBI on Thursday reportedly searched the home of FTX executive Ryan Salame, a frequent political donor. Salame has not been charged with a crime.

The largest amount sent to the U.S. Marshals came from the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, which received $36,500 from Nishad Singh, FTX’s former director of engineering, who pleaded guilty in February to six conspiracy charges. The DSCC did not respond to Raw Story’s request for comment.

The Republican National Committee received $25,000 from Salame, according to the FEC filing. The RNC declined to comment.

RELATED ARTICLE: Beto O’Rourke returned $1 million check from FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried

Raw Story’s review of the FEC filings indicated that of the political committees to unload money to the Marshals Service, Salame contributed to 15, Bankman-Fried to six and Singh to five.

It is highly unusual for the Marshals Service to involve itself in electoral politics generally, and it almost never collects money from political campaigns. Federal Election Commission records show it’s happened once during the past decade prior to the flurry of disgorgements during recent weeks. The Marshals Service does, however, list “seizing assets gained by illegal means and providing for the custody, management, and disposal of forfeited assets” among its responsibilities.

Campaigns typically send unwanted donor cash — particularly money from contributors who find themselves in legal jeopardy or public disrepute — to the U.S. Treasury, which generally absorbs it into the nation’s general fund.

Sending money to the Marshals Service is “a way for these political committees to resolve the situation, and then whatever they do with Sam Bankman-Fried, that's a whole other issue,” said Michael Toner, a partner at Wiley Rein and former Republican FEC chairman who served on the commission from 2002 to 2007. “It may be that the authorities have preferred the disgorgements go to the U.S. Marshals Service because obviously that's an arm of the federal government, and it would accomplish the same purpose as a disgorgement" to the U.S. Treasury.

“It appears this is related to the FTX case, and all inquiries are being referred to the USAO in the Southern District of New York,” Dave Oney, a spokesman for the Marshals Service, told Raw Story via email.

The Department of Justice and the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of New York did not respond to Raw Story’s requests for comment.

Emphasizing that she was speculating, Ann Ravel, a Democrat and former FEC chairwoman who served from 2013 to 2017, said, “I've never seen anything like this, and maybe they think because they can't rely on [campaign] people doing what they're supposed to do, that they need more active campaign finance enforcers.”

Raw Story contacted each political committee that disgorged money to the Marshals Service between January, when the phenomenon first began, and late March, when most disgorgements took place. Most committees did not respond to messages.

But the campaign of Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) indicated that Crenshaw didn’t need a push to return the $2,900 Salame contributed to Crenshaw for Congress on Oct. 10, 2022.

“Obviously the campaign didn’t know at the time that FTX was engaged in criminal activity,” said Sue Walden, Crenshaw for Congress’ political director, in a statement to Raw Story. “We were happy to oblige the Justice Department’s request.”

Among the political contributions that federal political committees have sent the U.S. Marshals:

Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee — $36,500

Republican National Committee — $25,000

Former Republican Sen. Ben Sasse — $5,800

Rep. Mike Simpson (R-ID) — $5,800

Former Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-NY) Campaign Fund — $5,800

Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-NH) — $5,800

Sen. John Boozman (R-AR) — $5,800

Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) — $5,800

Rep. Eli Crane (R-AZ) — $2,900

Rep. Larry Bucshon (R-IN) — $2,900

Rep. Chuck Edwards (R-NC) — $2,900

Rep. Alex Mooney (R-WV) — $2,900

Rep. Julia Letlow (R-LA) — $2,900

Rep. Greg Casar (D-TX) — $2,900

Rep. Salud Carbajal (D-CA) — $2,900

Rep. Jeff Duncan (R-SC) — $2,900

Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) — $2,900

Rep. Morgan Griffith (R-VA) — $2,900

Rep. Maxwell Alejandro Frost (D-FL) — $2,900

Rep. Bill Johnson (R-OH) — $2,900

Rep. John Moolenaar (R-MI) — $2,900

Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-OH) — $2,900

Rep. Kay Granger (R-TX) — $2,900

Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) Presidential Exploratory Committee — $2,900

Rep. Gary Palmer (R-AL) — $2,900

Rep. Buddy Carter (R-GA) — $2,900

Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL) — $2,900

Rep. Kathy Castor (D-FL) — $2,900

Rep. Sean Casten (D-IL) — $2,700

Athena Pac (Democratic Rep. Kathy Castor of Florida) — $2,500

Axne PAC (Democratic Rep. Cynthia Axne of Iowa) — $1,618