All posts tagged "tom homan"

'The second red flag is even more alarming': Ex-watchdog disturbed by Homan bribery case

A former government watchdog highlighted several red flags in the bribery investigation into President Donald Trump's border czar, who's accused of taking $50,000 from undercover FBI agents he promised to help obtain government contracts.

Investigators were tipped off in summer 2024 that Homan was soliciting bribes ahead of Trump's re-election and set up a sting operation involving FBI agents posing as businessmen, but former inspector general Mark Lee Greenblatt published an op-ed for the New York Times analyzing the probe and its closure earlier this year.

"The first red flag is apparent enough: Mr. Homan and the White House gave inconsistent responses to the allegations," Greenblatt wrote. "Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, told reporters that Mr. Homan never took the money — a flat, categorical denial. Mr. Homan has said only that he did nothing wrong and nothing illegal. Notice the difference."

"If Mr. Homan did not accept the bag of cash, why not just say so?" he wrote. "Why fall back on a narrow denial about wrongdoing or illegality? Whose account is more credible?"

Greenblatt, who Trump appointed him inspector general at the Interior Department in 2019 and fired when he returned to office, said Homan matter cried out for independent investigation.

"The second red flag is even more alarming," he wrote. "When Mr. Trump took office, Mr. Homan was under F.B.I. investigation for bribery. And yet he went on to serve as a senior White House official, likely with a high security clearance. How did that happen?"

"Obtaining a security clearance is a rigorous process, particularly for senior officials," Greenblatt added. "Investigators are supposed to scrutinize an applicant’s background, finances and potential vulnerabilities to influence. An active federal investigation for bribery should set off alarm bells, at the very least."

Those allegations appear to have been known to those conducting Homan's clearance and deemed irrelevant, Greenblatt wrote, or there might have been no security evaluation of him at all.

"Both possibilities are extremely troubling," Greenblatt wrote. "Either the security clearance process failed in spectacular fashion or there’s a dangerous gap in the system designed to protect sensitive government information."

The third red flag involved the tax implications of the alleged bribe, because Internal Revenue Service all income, even ill-gotten gains, to be reported for tax purposes.

"It may sound absurd, but it is the law," Greenblatt wrote.

"If Mr. Homan did in fact accept a $50,000 payment, did he report it as income on his taxes?" he added. "If not, that omission could conceivably constitute tax crime, a serious federal offense in its own right. Just ask Al Capone. Did the Justice Department and FBI ever examine the potential tax violations as part of their inquiry? And if not, why not?"

David Letterman exposed exactly what Trump is

We should talk about two stories published over the weekend, and what they tell Americans about the true objective of Donald Trump.

First, the administration shut down a bribery investigation of Tom Homan. Before Trump was reelected, Homan accepted a $50,000 bag of cash from an undercover FBI agent, according to Reuters. Homan apparently promised “immigration-related” government contracts once he was back in charge of Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Second, Trump demanded that US Attorney General Pam Bondi move more quickly to prosecute named enemies, including US Senator Adam Schiff, former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James. Trump called them “guilty as hell” on Truth Social in what appears to be a post intended to be a direct message to Bondi. As one observer noted wryly, “this is literally just Watergate but instead of the Nixon tapes, Trump just … tweeted it out.”

This twofold perversion of the law is indeed what Richard Nixon was guilty of. He knew he was guilty of it. That’s why he hid it and it took a year for investigators to uncover it. Trump, meanwhile, isn’t bothering to hide it, but either way, it’s criminal.

As Jonathan Bernstein said:

“Richard Nixon resigned ahead of certain impeachment and removal in part for a much milder version of all this, one that took place in absolute secrecy and took over a year to uncover. Trump is doing a much worse version. Out in the open. It’s obviously a blatant, massive violation of his oath of office, and [Chief Justice] John Roberts notwithstanding … well, I’m not a lawyer, but it sure looks criminal to me.”

More than that, however, it’s a window into what Trump truly wants — rules and laws that protect him and his friends while at the same time, those very same rules and laws punish his enemies. He wants rules and laws to explicitly recognize in-groups and out-groups. And he wants law enforcement to recognize that difference when enforcing the law.

All men are created equal? Nope. Justice is blind? Nah.

Most of us believe the law should be applied without fear or favor. Whether you’re white or Black, Christian or Muslim, straight or trans — everyone is subject to the same rule of law. Everyone should be treated equally. And when the law isn’t applied that way, we call it injustice.

But I think most of us misunderstand, more or less, how equality is viewed by Trump and the rest of their MAGA movement. Equality is no virtue. It’s a vice. It is a violation of their rights and liberties, and a subversion of what they believe to be the natural order of things — in which American society is shaped like a pyramid, with money and power gathered toward the top and controlled by rich white men. Importantly, the in-group should never be treated the same way as the out-group. When the law is applied equally, they call that injustice.

All this is blindingly hypocritical (and we should say so) but the term “hypocrisy” can’t capture the enormity of the fraud. MAGA does not pay lip service to equality. It opposes it, often openly. A better term is impunity — for the rule of law and for the rest of the small-r republican values that are enshrined in the Constitution. Impunity is the true goal. Trump’s success, whatever that means, literally depends on everyone else obeying the law, under penalty of law, while he is free to break it.

That’s what was going on when Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt was asked: "Why won't the president accept the conclusions of his DOJ to not bring charges against Letitia James?"

Her response: "The president has every right to express how he feels about these people … who literally tried to ruin his life … He wants to see accountability."

Crimes for me, punishment for thee.

Trump isn’t hiding the fraud the way Nixon did, but he is hiding it in his own way — beneath a mountain of propaganda about his enemies.

The Justice Department official who closed the bribery investigation into Tom Homan said it was a “deep state” op. Trump himself urged Bondi to prosecute quickly based on the lie that his impeachments and indictments were baseless. He said: “We can’t delay any longer, it’s killing our reputation and credibility. They impeached me twice, and indicted me … OVER NOTHING. JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED, NOW!!!”

But I think the lies could fade into the background as the abject unfairness of his presidency comes more into the mainstream view. Indeed, the lies could end up fading even faster thanks to Trump himself. His post, which was clearly intended for Bondi, conveys a sense of urgency — as if he’s aware that time is running out for his totalitarian project and people are beginning to figure out his scam.

Polls indicate a public deeply dissatisfied with his presidency, creating conditions for a potential takeover of the Congress by the Democrats. Such uncertainty is going to give collaborators and opportunists like Bondi a serious reason to hesitate. As David Frum wrote, “Such people now have to make a difficult calculation: Do the present benefits of submitting to Trump’s will outweigh the future hazards?"

That’s why, it’s a good idea for the Democrats to begin building a case for law and order, which is to say, for restoring the equal and moral administration of justice. (Reformers like Casey Michel and Adam Bonica might call this an anti-corruption platform, for other reasons.) Do it now, as Trump’s power grab is reaching a tipping point. Promise to hold accountable anyone tempted to break the law in Trump’s name.

“I want to make it clear. There’s going to be a Democratic majority in just over a year,” California Congressman Eric Swalwell said. “To the FCC chairperson [Brendan Carr] and anyone involved in these dirty deals: get a lawyer and save your records, because you’re going to be in this room answering questions about the deals that you struck, and who benefited, and what the cost was to the American people.”

I have some sympathy for Democratic leaders in that it’s difficult to pinpoint a “kitchen-table” issue that will appeal to a broad majority of people, but especially voters who are loosely affiliated with the parties. Right now, they have settled on health care. All the power to them.

But Trump is unlike any president in our lifetimes, even Nixon, who was a crook. Everything Trump has done since taking office a second time — illegal tariffs, illegal self-dealing, illegal funding cuts, illegal terminations, illegal military occupations, illegal immigrant detentions, illegal media censorship, illegal everything, virtually — is rooted in the fact that his administration is, as David Letterman said last week, an “authoritarian criminal administration.”

Fighting crime is perhaps the kitchen-table issue.

Besides, being the party of crime-fighters has a nice ring to it.

Trump official accused of bribery scheme now faces 'another legal hazard': experts

A Donald Trump official who reportedly was under investigation for accepting a bribe now has "another legal hazard" to look forward to, according to experts.

Raw Story reported on Saturday about a MSNBC exclusive in which the outlet claimed that Trump border czar Tom Homan had previously been investigated for accepting $50,000 from undercover FBI agents. That caused U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) to issue a stinging four-word response to Homan.

It also caused a senator to declare that Attorney General Pam Bondi "knew" about the reported bribery operation.

But legal experts warned that Homan might not be out of the woods yet, even if charges were never brought.

Constitutional law professor Anthony Michael Kreis said, "Your occasional reminder that bribes are reportable income."

Former Bush adviser David Frum chimed in, "If Tom Homan accepted $50,000 in cash in September 2024, that money should have been declared on his tax return in April 2025. If not, that's another legal hazard for him."

Brendan Fischer wrote, "It is unclear whether Homan held on to the $50k bribe, or whether he disclosed the payment on his financial disclosure report, which requires that he report all clients who paid him over $5k/year."

Other users asked Elon Musk's AI chatbot, Grok, about the purported non-disclosure. Grok responded, "There's no public info on whether Tom Homan claimed the alleged $50,000 as income on his taxes. The 2024 FBI probe was closed in 2025 by the Trump DOJ, citing insufficient evidence for charges, according to MSNBC, Politico, and NYT reports. Tax details remain private."

'Knives will be out': Conservatives predict big 'firestorm' around new Trump admin scandal

President Donald Trump's border czar Tom Homan is facing backlash following reports released Saturday that revealed he was investigated by the FBI for allegedly accepting a $50,000 cash payment from undercover agents posing as business executives. The investigation, initiated in 2024, was ultimately closed by Trump administration officials earlier this year due to a lack of "credible evidence" of criminal wrongdoing.

Conservative commentator Sarah Longwell sharply reacted to the news, calling the lack of accountability “insane” and saying the scandal is emblematic of broader corruption in the Trump orbit.

During a podcast on The Bulwark Saturday, she argued that the entire “ecosystem around Trump sells influence,” noting that people close to Trump often profit simply by being close, promising to deliver favors or contracts if he wins, regardless of whether they hold formal office. She said it mirrors what she sees as “downstream corruption” from Trump — from countries offering bribes, to premium‑clubs run by his children — and that in Homan’s case, it shows how normalized these kinds of allegations have become.

Longwell noted that Homan has been a controversial figure in the administration.

"If this were just some unnamed member of the Trump administration, people would probably be like, yep, they’re all corrupt. But in this case, this guy is... like one of the biggest villains in the Trump administration."

She continued: "He is the architect of going and yanking people off the streets, of sending people to torture prisons, even when they’re innocent. Like that’s this guy. And so knives will be out forever for this guy. And rightly so. He has been terrible from the beginning. He has never made even an ounce of an attempt to act like he is going to work through the immigration process in sort of a lawful, humane way. He has been clear from the jump he was going to be as inhumane and destructive as possible as he did this. And so it doesn’t strike me one bit that this is not a good person. And that it is the kind of person who was taking old school bribes," she added.

The Bulwark's Tim Miller added that what distinguishes this scandal is its relative simplicity. He said the Homan case, essentially accepting a bag of cash in exchange for promising favors, is the sort of corruption most people can immediately grasp.

Miller contrasted it with more abstract or technical issues like crypto, stablecoins, or AI regulation, which tend to lose people’s attention.

"I do wonder if that the simplicity of it is going to mean that there is a greater firestorm around this than there’s been around the crypto stuff," he added.

'Tom Homan should be in jail': Onlookers pounce on Trump official's 'corrupt' bribe scheme

"The most corrupt administration we have ever seen" is how Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D) reacted to a report that Donald Trump's border czar had accepted a $50,000 bribe from undercover agents.

Raw Story reported on Saturday about a MSNBC exclusive in which the outlet claimed that Homan had previously been investigated for accepting $50,000 from undercover FBI agents. That caused U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) to issue a stinging four-word response to Homan.

It also caused a senator to declare that Attorney General Pam Bondi "knew" about the reported bribery operation.

Reactions came in fast online.

Journalist Adam Klasfeld called the report a "must-read scoop."

Conor James Lamb, an attorney and politician who served as the U.S. representative from 2018 to 2023, said, "Dems must immediately demand the entire investigative file and not give DOJ another dollar till they get it. *Our* money is paying for this corruption."

Dem strategist Mike Nellis said, "Congress should haul in Pam Bondi and Kash Patel this week to explain why the FBI caught Tom Homan taking bribes—and why Trump’s DOJ killed the case."

"That’s corruption, plain and simple," Nellis then added.

Cato Institute's The Alex Nowrasteh also chimed in:

"The FBI recorded Trump’s border czar accepting a $50,000 bribe. Then the Trump administration buried it to protect their guy. If true, Tom Homan should be in prison with those who covered it up. Pretty minor corruption for Trump’s 2nd term though."

Maya Wiley wrote, "When the collar is white & the work is to racially profile & abuse people seems old fashioned bribery is protected."

"We shouldn’t be surprised but we must be outraged," the analyst wrote Saturday.

Former MSNBC personality Keith Olbermann said, "BREAKING: Simply put this corrupt bully [Homan] now needs to be cuffed, hands behind his back, and led across the border."

AOC taunts Trump's border czar with four-word reply after report he accepted bribe

U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) had a stinging response for Donald Trump's border czar following a report that Tom Homan had accepted a bribe from undercover FBI agents.

Raw Story reported on Saturday about a MSNBC exclusive in which the outlet claimed that Homan had previously been investigated for accepting $50,000 from undercover FBI agents.

"In an undercover operation last year, the FBI recorded Tom Homan, now the White House border czar, accepting $50,000 in cash after indicating he could help the agents — who were posing as business executives — win government contracts in a second Trump administration, according to multiple people familiar with the probe and internal documents reviewed by MSNBC," the outlet reported. "The FBI and the Justice Department planned to wait to see whether Homan would deliver on his alleged promise once he became the nation’s top immigration official. But the case indefinitely stalled soon after Donald Trump became president again in January, according to six sources familiar with the matter. In recent weeks, Trump appointees officially closed the investigation, after FBI Director Kash Patel requested a status update on the case, two of the people said."

Ocasio-Cortez had a brief response over the weekend. She tagged Homan on X and wrote, "Who’s the illegal now?"

Top Trump official 'investigated for accepting $50,000 from undercover FBI agents': report

Tom Homan, U.S. President Donald Trump's border czar, was reportedly investigated for accepting $50,000 from undercover FBI agents.

Carol Leonnig and Ken Dilanian of MSNBC over the weekend reported that Homan was under investigation and that, "The FBI and Justice officials closed the investigation, which a Justice Department appointee had called a 'deep state' probe in early 2025."

"In an undercover operation last year, the FBI recorded Tom Homan, now the White House border czar, accepting $50,000 in cash after indicating he could help the agents — who were posing as business executives — win government contracts in a second Trump administration, according to multiple people familiar with the probe and internal documents reviewed by MSNBC," the outlet reported. "The FBI and the Justice Department planned to wait to see whether Homan would deliver on his alleged promise once he became the nation’s top immigration official. But the case indefinitely stalled soon after Donald Trump became president again in January, according to six sources familiar with the matter. In recent weeks, Trump appointees officially closed the investigation, after FBI Director Kash Patel requested a status update on the case, two of the people said."

According to the report, "It’s unclear what reasons FBI and Justice Department officials gave for shutting down the investigation" into the man who Trump has leaned on to accomplish his immigration raid goals.

"The federal investigation was launched in western Texas in the summer of 2024 after a subject in a separate investigation claimed Homan was soliciting payments in exchange for awarding contracts should Trump win the presidential election, according to an internal Justice Department summary of the probe reviewed by MSNBC and people familiar with the case," the report states.

Read the full piece here.


'They will be prosecuted, too': Trump border czar targets those funding protests

White House border czar Tom Homan warned that people funding First Amendment protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) "would be prosecuted."

During a Sunday morning interview on Fox News, Homan told host Jason Chaffetz that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) had a "historic number of prosecutions" against protesters for "impediment, assault, interference."

"So those protesters that we do see, I mean, some of it might be organic, but does strike me, it seems like a lot of them are being bused in," the Fox News host argued. "You see them at the end of these protests, actually getting back on buses."

"Are these protesters, the bulk of them, are they actually being financed from the outside?" he wondered. "And is that something that Homeland's looking at? Is the financing of how all these so-called organic protests are happening?"

"Absolutely," Homan admitted. "We know a lot of these protesters are being paid. Many have admitted to it. So, yes, there's a whole effort right now in identifying those who are funding these operations, those who fund the weapons that are being used."

"So, yeah, and they'll be held accountable too and held to the highest standards of the law," he added. "They will be prosecuted, too."

It is not illegal to fund constitutionally-protected free speech in the U.S.

Watch the video below from Fox News or click the link.

'Not hard to find!' Trump official's drug-dealing kin floated for deportation

Political consultant Stuart Stevens suggested that the Department of Homeland Security look a little closer to home — perhaps as close as the White House — in its efforts to root out convicted criminals for deportation.

Stevens addressed ICE chief Tom Homan on X, writing Thursday, "Here’s a tip, Tom Homan: Cuban born convicted narco-cartel drug dealer named Orlando Cicilia still in America. He’s not hard to find. He’s Marco Rubio’s brother-in law."

Stevens included a link to a Washington Post report from 2015 when Senator Rubio, now secretary of State, was running for the Republican nomination against Donald Trump.

In an article titled, "The drug-smuggling case that brought anguish to Marco Rubio's family," Post reporters Manuel Roig-Franzia and Scott Higham recounted a pivotal moment from Rubio's life in 1987.

"A teenager named Marco Rubio arrived home from school in West Miami to find his mother in anguish," they wrote. "Earlier that day, federal drug agents raided a house a few miles away that his brother-in-law, Orlando Cicilia, shared with Rubio’s older sister, Barbara."

The article continued that "as the future senator from Florida was finishing high school and preparing to go to college, his brother-in-law's illicit career as a cocaine dealer was exposed in a major trial," which would lead to a lengthy prison sentence.

The reporters added that there was "no evidence that Rubio or his parents were aware of Cicilia’s drug dealing, and Rubio’s sister was not suspected of any crime."

"Perhaps more relevantly Cicilia remained close to Rubio and his family after the arrest," according to Vox.

"It seems that Rubio helped out Cicilia with a letter to the Florida Real Estate Commission when Cicilia was applying for a license in 2002," wrote reporter Matthew Yglesias.

"Under the circumstances, the recommendation from a powerful state legislator likely carried a lot of weight, and Cicilia got his license."

Read the Vox story here.


ICE’s record cash infusion has expert wondering if they can even spend it all

Prominent immigration attorney Aaron Reichlin-Melnick claimed that Thursday's passage of Donald Trump's mega spending bill has made Immigration and Customs Enforcement "the highest-funded federal law enforcement agency in history."

Reichlin-Melnick posted to X that ICE will now have "more money per year at its disposal over the next four years than the budgets of the FBI, DEA, ATF, US Marshals, and Bureau of Prisons combined."

In a follow-up post, Reichlin-Melnick, who's a senior fellow with the American Immigration Council, broke down the numbers that appear in Trump's "big, beautiful bill."

"Here is the funding for immigration enforcement in the bill, to be spent through September 30, 2029," he wrote. "$74.9 billion for ICE detention and removal; $65.6 billion for CBP infrastructure, hiring, tech; $10 billion DHS slush fund; $3.5 billion for state enforcement. And more!" he wrote, pointing to a list of the "totals of all immigration and border-enforcement related spending ."

Reichlin-Melnick called it an "open question as to whether ICE even *could* spend $45 billion on detention in the next 51 months, given the agency's normal detention budget is $3.4 billion."

This must be welcome news to Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem after Axios reported that ICE was perilously close to running out of funds.

Axios reported that ICE was “already $1 billion over budget” as it continues to stage raids across the country. Axios's lawmaker sources said the Department of Homeland Security, which is in charge of ICE, could be violating “U.S. law if it continues to spend at its current pace.”

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) summed it up, saying, “Trump's DHS is spending like drunken sailors."

It remains to be seen how far the new influx of cash will last the department as Donald Trump vows to build more "Alligator Alcatraz"-type tent detention centers across the country.