Top Stories Daily Listen Now
RawStory

Trump News

Trump is hitting the 'high-water mark' of his poll numbers: analysis

Although polls are currently showing that former President Donald Trump has a slight lead in the 2024 presidential race, The Bulwark's Jonathan Last argues that Trump's polls are hitting a "high-water mark" — and are unlikely to improve once the general election campaign begins properly.

Among other things, Last argues that Trump has essentially been gliding to the Republican Party presidential nomination and running against rivals who have been loathe to actually criticize him or his record.

Keep reading... Show less

Elise Stefanik buried for attempt to 'shrug' off Trump's abuses: op-ed

Republican Conference chair Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) was asked on NBC’s “Meet the Press" if she'd commit to accepting the results of the 2024 election — to which she replied, “We will see if this is a legal and valid election."

“What we’re seeing so far is that Democrats are so desperate, they’re trying to remove President Trump from the ballot," she added, referring to state-level efforts to disqualify him under an insurrectionist clause in the Constitution.

Keep reading... Show less

'Battle lines drawn' for 2024 Biden-Trump rematch: 'Time to end this standoff'

This year's presidential election is shaping up to be a rematch of 2020's contest, and the weirdness of that election and its aftermath will almost certainly carry over into this one.

The pandemic upended everyday life four years ago, and Donald Trump disrupted the peaceful transition of power by refusing to accept his election loss to Joe Biden. He tried a variety of schemes to remain in power and incited his followers to attempt a violent insurrection on Jan. 6, 2021 — and he's made it plain those efforts are unfinished, wrote Salon columnist Heather Digby Parton.

Keep reading... Show less

'I am terrified': Michelle Obama opens up about sleepless nights

Former First Lady Michelle Obama is terrified of what might happen in the 2024 presidential election, she said in an interview released Monday.

“What’s going to happen for us in this next election?” Obama asked. “I am terrified about what could possibly happen because our leaders matter.”

Keep reading... Show less

Jim Jordan accused of trying to pull fast one with promise of 'damning evidence' on Biden

During an appearance on Fox News on Sunday, House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan (R-OH) boasted to host Maria Bartiromo that his Republicans have damning evidence that will once and for all lead to the impeachment of President Joe Biden.

However, as MSNBC's Steve Benen pointed out, Jordan was trying to pull a fast one on Fox viewers by touting information that was debunked in the middle of last year.

Keep reading... Show less

'So what?' Ex-aide shares Trump's reaction when told Mike Pence's life was at risk

In his election interference case against Donald Trump, special counsel Jack Smith is trying to show how the former president responded when the U.S. Capitol Building was under attack on January 6, 2021. Smith, according to ABC News, has uncovered new details about that response — details that ABC News' Jonathan Karl discussed during a Monday appearance on MSNBC's "Morning Joe."

Karl told conservative host Joe Scarborough, "These are really the defining hours of the Trump presidency: what Trump was doing in the White House while the attack was underway. We've heard from Liz Cheney; we've heard from others. But now, what the special counsel has done is they've methodically gone through and spoken to everybody who was with Trump during that time — people that refused to talk to the January 6 Committee, like Dan Scavino, perhaps Trump's closest aide in the White House."

Keep reading... Show less

Trump warned there will be 'little tolerance' for his 'shenanigans' at immunity hearing

Responding to a blustery announcement from Donald Trump that he will be making an appearance at the U.S. Court of Appeals for a Tuesday hearing on his presidential immunity appeal, one former prosecutor warned the former president that he is on thin ice.

Just after midnight Monday, Trump took to his Truth Social platform to announce, "I will be attending the the (sic) Federal Appeals Court Arguments on Presidential Immunity in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday. Of course I was entitled, as President of the United States and Commander in Chief, to Immunity. I wasn’t campaigning, the Election was long over. I was looking for voter fraud, and finding it, which is my obligation to do, and otherwise running running (sic) our Country."

Keep reading... Show less

Trump begs Georgia judge to dismiss case with 3 desperate motions in single morning

Donald Trump filed motion after motion on Monday urging a Georgia judge to dismiss the election interference case against him.

In the first motion to Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee, Trump argued that he had presidential immunity when he allegedly conspired to organize an alternate slate of electors to overturn the 2020 election.

Keep reading... Show less

'Borders on comical': Law professor sticks a knife in Trump's latest legal filing

Former President Donald Trump asked a court on Monday to dismiss Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis' case against him by claiming "absolute immunity" for any actions he took as part of his official duties as president.

Michael Anthony Kreis, a law professor at the Georgia State University College of Law, examined Trump's filing — and quickly concluded it wasn't worth the paper it was written on.

Keep reading... Show less

'Reeks of narcissism': George Conway carves up Trump lawyers' bid to keep him on ballot

Attorney George Conway has penned a lengthy piece for The Atlantic in which he takes President Donald Trump's lawyers to task for their arguments in favor of keeping him on Colorado's Republican primary ballot.

In particular, he noted that Trump's petition to the United States Supreme Court about his ballot eligibility "didn’t conform with the ordinary rules and practices" and instead asks what he describes as "a Cuisinart of a question" -- namely, "Did the Colorado Supreme Court err in ordering President Trump excluded from the 2024 presidential primary ballot?"

Keep reading... Show less

Trump officially asks Georgia judge to dismiss case: 'Absolute immunity shields him'

Attorneys for former President Donald Trump argued that a Georgia election interference case should be dismissed because he has "absolute immunity" from prosecution.

In an expected 67-page motion, Trump asked Fulton County Judge Scott McAfee to dismiss the case against him. Trump is accused of participating in a conspiracy to overturn the 2020 presidential election.

Keep reading... Show less

Trump has 'steep uphill climb' to convince judges in upcoming hearing: legal expert

Donald Trump is facing a big week in court, but he faces a "steep uphill climb" in his effort to escape prosecution in the Washington, D.C., election subversion case, according to an expert.

The former president has asked an appeals court to grant him broad immunity in that case and others, arguing that he was acting in his official capacity as president when he sought to overturn his 2020 election loss.

Keep reading... Show less

Clarence Thomas put on the spot as court prepares to hear Trump ballot ban case

A newly established code of conduct put in place by the Supreme Court may come back to haunt Justice Clarence Thomas as the court prepares to hear testimony on whether Donald Trump can be banned from the ballot in 2024.

With the Colorado ballot case known as Anderson v. Griswold to be heard later in the year, Democratic lawmakers are putting Justice Thomas on the spot to recuse himself due to his wife's links to the Jan. 6 insurrection at the heart of the case.

As MSNBC's Hayes Brown explained, there are grave concerns about Thomas' impartiality — moreso than usual — with Democrats focusing on Ginni Thomas in their letter demanding he stay out of the case.

ALSO READ: ‘Official’ Trump calendar omits a critical detail

According to the letter delivered to the jurist from the Democrats, "A Justice should disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the Justice’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned, that is, where an unbiased and reasonable person who is aware of all relevant circumstances would doubt that the Justice could fairly discharge his or her duties," later continuing, "The Justice knows that the Justice…or the Justice’s spouse… has a financial interest in the subject matter in controversy or in a party to the proceeding, or any other interest that could be affected substantially by the outcome of the proceeding.”

The letter added, “The Justice or Justice’s spouse…is known by the Justice:…(iii) to have an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding.”

According to Brown, the letter may just be a case of Democrats "Shouting into the wind," but, at the same time, it puts the court, and Thomas, under increased scrutiny as it prepares to make a historic ruling on the seldom applied 14th Amendment.