Top Stories Daily Listen Now
RawStory
RawStory

Trump 'jumped the gun' as Greenland victory lap collides with Denmark's response

President Donald Trump declared Friday that the United States had secured “permanent control” over Greenland’s security — but Denmark and Greenland offered a sharply different account.

An official statement from Denmark and Greenland said they merely “expect” to sign an agreement with the U.S. next week that would strengthen security in the Arctic and North Atlantic. Even after it is signed, the agreement must undergo “the necessary parliamentary procedures” before taking effect, the two foreign governments said.

Greenlandic Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen said the proposed pact “recognizes Greenland's interests and our place in international cooperation.”

Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen emphasized that it also recognizes “the Kingdom's sovereignty and territorial integrity, as well as the right of the Greenlandic people to self-determination” — an important distinction missing from Trump’s announcement.

The starkly different descriptions drew mockery from journalists online.

“Greenland and Denmark: We ‘expect to be able to sign an agreement in the coming week,’” journalist Sam Stein wrote on X. “Trump: We have an ‘infinite life’ agreement giving ‘the United States permanent control over security, and all other needs, in Greenland.’”

Canadian journalist Annie Dufour called it “a tale of two ‘deals.’”

“Trump, as he did with Canada, jumped the gun and called the deal...a done deal,” she posted. “Unless Denmark and Greenland are hiding what is in the fine print, these look like two different deals.”

Online influencer Mario Nawfal noted that it was now a matter of wait-and-see.

“He described the maximum version,” Nawfal told his social media followers Friday. “They described a security pact that does not transfer the island. Next week the signed paper will show which description is right.”

Jim Acosta gives banned White House reporters a playbook to fight back

Former CNN White House correspondent Jim Acosta urged reporters targeted by President Donald Trump’s new media ban to remain on White House grounds — and prepare to sue.

“The reporters at the outlets that have been ‘banned’ should stay at the WH until their shifts are over,” Acosta wrote Friday on X.

Acosta recalled on social media leaving for dinner in 2018 after the Trump White House revoked his press pass. When he returned, Secret Service agents took his credentials.

“If a reporter who has been banned leaves the WH grounds then they may not be able to get back in,” he warned.

“The other thing I would do,” he continued, “is record the moment they take away your press pass (if that happens) with your phone. That way they can’t say you were unruly.”

The former CNN correspondent added: “Definitely take legal action.”

Trump sent shockwaves through Capitol Hill Friday when he announced he was banning CNN, MS NOW and Politico over coverage he called “FAKE NEWS.”

In 2018, Trump-appointed U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly ordered the White House to temporarily restore Acosta’s credentials, finding that the administration violated his due process rights, Acosta said.

His tips to reporters banned from the Trump White House didn’t go unnoticed.

“Jim’s firsthand advice,” podcaster Jeff Storobinsky wrote in response.

University of North Georgia rhetoric professor Matthew Boedy called Trump’s move “not merely anti-press but anti-courts.”

“He is defying what was ordered in the Acosta case,” he posted.

Meanwhile, former PBS NewsHour staffer Stephanie Willerton called Acosta’s guidance “important advice” for the targeted outlets.

James Comey's daughter skewers Trump DOJ's 'legal contortions' to fire her

The daughter of former FBI Director James Comey accused President Donald Trump’s Justice Department of resorting to “legal contortions” to defend her abrupt firing as a federal prosecutor.

Maurene Comey’s lawyer, Ellen Blain, made the argument during a hearing Friday over Comey’s lawsuit seeking her reinstatement, Politico reported.

Blain accused the Justice Department of claiming virtually unchecked power to “fire a civil servant because of her DNA.”

“Article II does not permit anyone to fire a line AUSA without cause,” Blain reportedly told the court, adding that “no court has found that criminal AUSAs or any AUSAs exercise the president’s preclusive and conclusive authority.”

Comey worked as a federal prosecutor in Manhattan for nearly a decade before she was dismissed without explanation last year, according to Politico. Her termination letter cited only Article II of the Constitution, which establishes presidential authority over the executive branch.

Comey alleges in her legal filing that she was fired “solely or substantially” because she is James Comey’s daughter, because of her perceived political beliefs, or both.

Justice Department attorney Tyler Becker argued that a recent Supreme Court ruling expanding Trump’s control over federal agencies also applies to lower-level officials.

“Employees or inferior officers who exercise conclusive and preclusive executive power must be removable at will,” Becker said.

U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman pressed Becker on whether that authority would allow the president to fire someone because of race or gender.

“Article II would not permit inquiry into that matter,” Becker said.

‘Truly alarming’: Backlash erupts after false report ‘almost started a war’

A bombshell report that faulty artificial intelligence nearly pushed the U.S. military into a confrontation with China sparked alarm and outrage across social media Friday.

A chatbot falsely concluded that a Chinese ship in the Middle East was carrying components for a nuclear weapons program, according to an exclusive CNN report. Military planes were already airborne and armed personnel were preparing to board the vessel when officials discovered the error.

“This is a truly alarming story,” CNN anchor Jim Sciutto posted on X.

Task & Purpose reporter Patty Nieberg warned that the danger came from people accepting AI-generated claims without checking them.

“AI won’t directly kill us yet,” she wrote on social media. “It’ll be because people are too lazy to check and an AI algorithm made something up.”

Travis Akers, a retired Navy intelligence officer, was more blunt.

“The Pentagon is an absolute wreck,” Akers wrote. “Pure incompetence at every turn.”

CNN senior political reporter Aaron Blake contrasted the revelation with a Department of War post declaring that the United States “will continue to be AI dominant.”

CNN anchor Jake Tapper also appeared to connect the exclusive to Trump’s announcement that CNN reporters would be barred from the White House.

“I’m not sure which of these news stories so distressed the president,” Tapper wrote while sharing Trump’s ban and the network’s report.

"Not the best natsec day for Trump admin," added Wall Street Journal national security reporter Alex Ward.

Trump makes eye-opening admission about son's wedding: 'He didn't do a background check'

President Donald Trump acknowledged Friday that his eldest son may not have conducted a background check before accepting lavish wedding celebrations from a Russian oligarch with ties to Vladimir Putin.

Asked in the Oval Office whether it was appropriate for Donald Trump Jr. to accept the gift, Trump insisted it was “totally allowed” and repeatedly claimed he had heard his son reimbursed oligarch Umar Kremlev.

“As I understand, he paid him back,” Trump said. “He didn’t want to have that. So I hear he paid him back.”

Trump described Kremlev only as “a person they know” and “a friend” before making an eye-opening admission when reporters continued grilling him.

“Well, I don’t know,” Trump said. “Maybe he didn’t do a background check.”

The president repeatedly insisted that paying for another person’s wedding festivities was “very common.”

“I’ve given wedding parties to numerous people,” Trump said Friday. “They get married, I give them a party. I give them parties at beautiful places like Mar-a-Lago and others.”

“With all of that being said,” Trump added. “I understand that Don’s paid him back. I actually heard that.”

ProPublica reported this week that Kremlev spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on the festivities, including a private-island rental and fireworks display.

‘You’re terrible’: Trump lashes out at female reporter when asked about media ban

President Donald Trump lashed out at a reporter in the Oval Office on Friday as she pressed him about his newly announced ban on CNN, MS NOW and Politico.

“Are you trying to intimidate the press from doing its job?” the female reporter asked, pointing to the First Amendment.

“No, no, no, no,” Trump replied. “I dislike dishonest press — like you. I think you’re terrible.”

The reporter noted that the Trump administration attempted a similar restriction against CNN during his first term and asked why he believed the new ban would survive a court challenge.

“I don’t think that a court should allow fake news to be written day after day after day," Trump said.

Trump announced the restrictions shortly before the exchange, accusing the three outlets of reporting “FAKE NEWS” and warning that other media organizations could be targeted next. He said in the Oval Office that it was “sick” that the country allows journalists to write what he called “purposely negative stories.”

“If they want to write them, that’s fine,” Trump said Friday. “But I don’t have to let them into the people’s house.”

Shockwaves as Trump's White House newsroom ban rocks DC: 'This is crazy'

President Donald Trump's abrupt decision to ban CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House immediately set off alarms Friday among journalists, political watchers and Democratic officials.

“Free speech absolutist!” wrote former Obama staffer and “Pod Save America” co-host Tommy Vietor.

Sarah Guerrero, communications director for Democrats on the House Oversight Committee, was more blunt: “This is f---ing crazy.”

Trump announced the ban on Truth Social, accusing the three outlets of repeatedly reporting “FICTION and LIES" about him and his administration. He also warned “Other Fake News Media Outlets” would follow.

“Free speech for me, not for thee,” award-winning media producer Andrew O’Keefe wrote in response.

Toronto Star columnist Bruce Arthur told his X followers that “the right are objectively anti-reality, and so attack journalists.”

Washington Sun reporter Oriana Gonzalez noted a pattern from the president’s party.

“Between this and House Rules Chair Virginia Foxx saying she wants to ban reporters from the Speaker’s lobby, Republicans are really coming after press access this week," she wrote in a post Friday.

“The party of free speech,” political writer Dan Shafer added.

'Magnitude of my rage startles me': Trump move revealed that finally broke Pulitzer-winner

A New York Times opinion writer said President Donald Trump’s campaign against the Kennedy Center has sparked a level of anger that surprised her.

“Now President Trump is out to destroy the Kennedy Center, and the magnitude of my rage startles me,” Pulitzer Prize-winning critic Robin Givhan wrote in a guest essay Friday. “After all, Mr. Trump has done so many other cruel, brutal things that have upended people’s lives, this democracy and its place in the world.”

But his takeover of the performing arts center and threat to demolish it signaled something larger for Givhan.

“Nothing has so thoroughly highlighted his indefatigable petulance,” she wrote. “Because Mr. Trump wants his name on the building. That’s it.”

Trump’s name was added to the Kennedy Center’s facade in December after he installed himself as chairman and filled its board with loyalists. But a federal judge has since ordered its removal, ruling that only Congress could rename the memorial.

Givhan described the controversy as part of Trump’s effort to remake Washington according to "his own gilded, tarty, self-aggrandizing taste.”

She also pointed to a viral photograph of Trump aboard Air Force One examining a poster with the words, “Kennedy Center DEMOLISHED.”

“Will his presidency be remembered more for his foolishness or his failure? Either way, everyone loses,” Givhan concluded. “And that most certainly includes Mr. Trump."

Trump expels CNN, MS NOW and Politico from White House in fit of rage — with more to come

President Donald Trump announced Friday that he is barring three major news organizations from the White House, effective immediately.

"I am proud to announce that, effective immediately, I am banning Fake News CNN, MSNOW ... and Politico ... from the White House as a result of their constant 'reporting' FAKE NEWS!" Trump wrote in a post on his Truth Social platform.

"Media Outlets shouldn't be able to constantly write or report FICTION and LIES when they're covering the President of the United States, the Trump Administration, or the United States of America," he continued, before suggesting the ban would widen. "Other Fake News Media Outlets to follow."

Trump uncorked two false claims into the announcement as parenthetical asides. He described MS NOW as having "recently changed their name from MSNBC due to lack of viewership and credibility!" The network became MS NOW on Nov. 15 because Comcast spun its cable networks into a separate company, Versant, and NBCUniversal retained exclusive rights to the Peacock brand. The network kept its programming lineup and expanded its Washington bureau during the transition.

He then called Politico the recipient of "an illegal and ridiculous $8 Million Dollar subscription, an All Time Record, directly from the United States Government, under Crooked Joe Biden, in order to keep them 'alive.'"

"Seems like corruption to me!" he wrote.

That figure is a recycled claim that fact-checkers debunked last year. Federal agencies across the government spent roughly $8 million in 2024 on subscriptions to Politico Pro and E&E News, paywalled products offering policy tracking and specialized reporting. USAID's share was $24,000, according to CBS News. Agencies also paid for subscriptions to The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal. The number entered circulation through a conservative commentator's viral thread in February 2025, after which the White House announced it would cancel the subscriptions. Politico has said it has never received government funding in its 18 years.

Trump did not specify what the ban entails or when it takes effect beyond "immediately."

The announcement extends a pattern of access restrictions.

The administration removed Reuters, The Associated Press and Bloomberg News from the permanent press pool, barred the AP from events where Trump speaks after it declined to adopt his renaming of the Gulf of Mexico, and in October 2025 closed the West Wing area housing the press secretary's office to reporters without appointments.

The White House Correspondents' Association said at the time that it "unequivocally opposes any effort" to limit journalists from areas long open for newsgathering.

Trump's ICE hit with threat from fed-up elections official: ‘They’re going to face prison’

Denver’s top election official is warning ICE and other federal agents that they could face prison if they appear at polling places to intimidate voters.

Paul López, Denver’s clerk and recorder, told NPR on Friday that officials have prepared for that possibility as the Trump administration sends mixed messages about federal law enforcement around the midterm elections.

“We have a plan put together just in case if that happens and it's not going to be a good day for any ICE agent or any other federal agent or anybody trying to intimidate anybody at the polls,” López said in the NPR exclusive. “They're going to face prison sentences.”

López is part of a coalition suing to block federal officers from polling locations. A second coalition filed another lawsuit Friday, NPR reported.

President Donald Trump said in May that he would do “anything necessary” to ensure “honest” elections. Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin later said ICE agents could serve warrants at polling places.

In a statement to NPR, the department said ICE “is not planning operations targeting polling locations,” but added that agents could make arrests if an active public safety threat emerged.

The Trump administration’s rhetoric is already “having a real impact on voters,” according to NPR. “Roughly 40% of voters now think it's likely ICE agents will be present at voting locations in their area,” the outlet said, citing a new University of California San Diego poll.

The lawsuits argue that deploying armed federal officers could violate federal protections, including the Voting Rights Act’s ban on voter intimidation.

'Unspeakably pathetic': White House fried for weird Wendy's humblebrag

The White House took a bizarre victory lap after Wendy’s this week announced the return of its iconic yellow packaging — even though the fast-food chain credited fans of the 90s-era bright color, not President Donald Trump.

Pop culture account Pop Crave shared the news on X alongside a photograph of a Wendy’s burger, fries, and drink displayed in the throwback design.

“Thank you, President Trump!!!!!” the official White House account replied, without explaining what the president had to do with the company’s decision.

The post quickly left users confused.

"Unspeakably pathetic," replied independent journalist Aaron Rupar.

“You will NOT believe what this is in response to,” internet personality Sheel Mohnot wrote Friday.

“Wild post from the White House,” X user Jay D3po told his over 50,000 followers.

“I don’t even know anymore man,” another user, QuoProQuid, posted.

Wendy’s offered a different explanation for the packaging revival that had nothing to do with Trump.

“Fans have been asking for its return for years, making it one of the most requested comebacks in Wendy’s history,” a company spokesperson told Today.com. “Yellow has been part of Wendy’s since the very beginning and is something many fans instantly recognize.”

The return is scheduled to begin later this month, but customers will reportedly have only through early 2027 to time-warp back to the old-school fast-food packaging.

‘It hurts us’: GOP strategist fumes over ‘unforced error’ as party faces ‘historic loss’

A veteran Republican strategist is sounding the alarm over what he views as a costly, self-inflicted wound threatening the GOP just weeks before the crucial midterm elections.

“It’s frustrating to see some of these comments,” Brendan Steinhauser, who managed former Sen. John Cornyn’s 2014 reelection campaign, told Newsweek. “Because I think it hurts us.”

Steinhauser was reacting to the Texas GOP's Railroad Commission nominee Bo French’s viral online post showing South Asian students celebrating a University of Texas football victory. French suggested the image showed “foreigners” in place of Texans at the university.

Steinhauser said French was creating “extra headwinds that are unnecessary” for Republicans just weeks before the election.

“The picture posted at UT Austin, that caused all the controversy, that was just an unforced error,” Steinhauser told the outlet. “So like, what are you doing? You know, there’s no sense in that.”

The firestorm in Texas comes as Republicans confront unexpectedly competitive races in a ruby red state where Democrats have not won a statewide election since 1994.

One new poll shows Democratic state Rep. James Talarico leading MAGA favorite Ken Paxton 49% to 43% in the Senate race, while Democrat Gina Hinojosa leads Republican Gov. Greg Abbott 49% to 45%, Newsweek reported Friday.

Political reporter Jacob Rubashkin called the numbers "absolutely brutal for Republicans" and warned they could lead to a "generational wipeout" if they hold through Election Day, according to the outlet.

Steinhauser said Republicans may still prevail, but acknowledged that Democrats now have a genuine opening.

“Although Republicans still might win in the end, it could be very close,” he said. “And it is at least a possibility that the Democrats could win.”

GOP door-knockers quietly flag 'greatest hurdle' for party in midterms: 'Huge concern'

Republican door-knockers are encountering a “huge concern” as the party struggles to energize voters ahead of November, according to CNN senior White House correspondent Kristen Holmes.

Leaders of multiple get-out-the-vote groups told Holmes their canvassers are finding “no enthusiasm” among Republican voters.

“When they go to these doors, they are telling me that there is just no enthusiasm there,” Holmes reported Thursday on CNN’s “Erin Burnett OutFront.” “It’s really hard to sell this administration, trying to get people excited — Republicans — to come out and vote.”

“That might be one of their greatest hurdles ahead of November,” she added.

Holmes said Republican operatives — including people inside Trump’s political operation — are “frustrated” and “annoyed” by GOP candidates publicly distancing themselves from Trump as they fight to hang on in difficult races, including Rep. Maria Elvira Salazar (R-FL).

“For some of them, as you saw there with Salazar, separating herself or separating themselves from President Trump is the way to go,” Holmes said.

Trump, she added, will likely ignore the concerns and “continue to say how well he’s doing.”

“But for his political operation, this is a major concern, particularly this close to the midterms,” Holmes concluded.

Pentagon insiders lament ‘mess’ as Hegseth’s ‘parole officer’ tightens grip

Pentagon insiders are sounding the alarm over the “mess” engulfing Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s department — as his wife reportedly tightens her grip on both her husband and his public image.

“She's like his parole officer and PR agent all at once,” one source told the Daily Mail, which detailed Jennifer Hegseth’s unusually powerful but unofficial presence inside the Trump Pentagon.

“Now there's a woman with an extremely tight leash on the man she married,” another source told the outlet Thursday.

Staffers have reportedly nicknamed Jennifer Hegseth “Yoko Ono,” comparing her to John Lennon’s fiercely protective wife. She has accompanied her husband to meetings with foreign defense officials, reportedly taken notes and photos during some discussions, and was included in a sensitive Signal chat about U.S. military operations.

Hegseth’s wife also helped bar reporters from the Pentagon, “one of several moves to choke off transparency,” according to the Daily Mail.

“People should know what a mess it is,” an Army officer told the outlet. “Things have gone from bad to worse. It's unbelievably chaotic and demoralizing.”

Chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell defended Jennifer Hegseth as “an accomplished leader in her own right and a devoted military spouse.”

“She is a vital asset and a true force multiplier for our mission,” he said in a statement, adding that the department “not only welcomes her current leadership but actively plans to involve her even more deeply in the future.”

‘Not our best messenger’: GOP allies leave Trump out of upcoming $100m ad blitz

President Donald Trump’s allies are unleashing a $100 million advertising blitz to help Republicans survive the midterms — but they are largely leaving Trump himself out of it.

Republican advertisers aired more than 500 television ads costing over $160 million during the first half of September, according to a new CNN analysis of AdImpact data. Just 12 ads totaling about $1 million in spending mentioned the president — less than 1% of GOP advertising spending.

“His near absence from GOP advertising underscores the degree to which he has become a political liability,” CNN reported Thursday, pointing to Trump’s 36% approval rating.

The advertising snub is a “striking contrast” to Trump’s repeated plea for supporters to “pretend that I’m on the ballot.”

Republican advertisers told CNN that the party’s best chance of retaining the Senate majority lies in attacking Democratic candidates rather than showcasing Trump.

“The president is not the best message or our best messenger at this point,” one veteran Republican ad strategist involved in several midterm contests told the network.

For Democrats, however, Trump is front and center. They spent nearly $23 million on 95 ads mentioning the MAGA leader during the same period, often tying Republican candidates directly to him.

A MAGA-linked PAC, No Going Back, has reserved more than $100 million in fall advertising, but has avoided mentioning Trump so far, according to CNN.

The analysis Thursday noted that there have been no GOP ads detected that promote Trump’s promise to issue $5,000 checks to all U.S. citizens if Republicans keep control of Congress.