Top Stories Daily Listen Now
RawStory
RawStory

DeSantis demands impeachment of judge who freed sex offender before 5-year-old's killing

Gov. Ron DeSantis is calling on the Florida House to impeach a Tallahassee judge who briefly released a sex offender onto the streets, resulting in the killing of the man’s 5-year-old stepdaughter.

“To my friends in the Florida House of Representatives, I don’t think what you’ve done is enough,” DeSantis said during a Tampa press conference on Tuesday. “You have the power, and you have sufficient numbers in your chamber, to impeach this judge, Tiffany Baker-Carper.

“Until you start holding these judges accountable, they are gonna continue to find ways to benefit the criminal element,” he added.

Judge Tiffany Baker-Carper via Florida Second Judicial Circuit

The comments were the strongest yet from the governor who’s long-battled who he calls “activist judges.” Although it’s the first time DeSantis — who’s insisted for years that unruly judges must be held accountable — has pushed for impeachment, it comes only days after President Donald Trump publicly called for a federal judge to be impeached.

It takes a two-thirds vote from the Florida House to impeach judicial officers, followed by a two-thirds vote in the Senate to remove them. Republicans make up nearly 70% of lawmakers in each chamber.

DeSantis’ impeachment call came Tuesday as he signed Missy’s Law. A priority bill for Attorney General James Uthmeier, the legislation demands judges keep defendants convicted of dangerous crimes in custody instead of freeing them ahead of sentencing.

That’s what happened in the case of Daniel Spencer, a 35-year-old convicted in an underage sex sting for attempting to meet a 15-year-old girl. Leon County Judge Tiffany Baker-Carper didn’t lock him up pending sentencing because he’d already been out of jail for a year without violations and had no violent criminal history, the Tallahassee Democrat reported.

But a month later, he — along with the girl’s mother, Chloe Spencer — beat and murdered his stepdaughter, Missy Mogle. Both Spencers were charged with second-degree murder in May 2025.

Baker-Carper was elected to the Second Judicial Circuit on Nov. 3, 2020.

“It’s a miscarriage of justice, a dereliction of judicial duty,” DeSantis said. “If we had this bill in place then, Missy would be alive today.”

Independent Journalism for All

As a nonprofit newsroom, our articles are free for everyone to access. Readers like you make that possible. Can you help sustain our watchdog reporting today?

SUPPORT

Florida Phoenix is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Florida Phoenix maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Michael Moline for questions: info@floridaphoenix.com.

Red state prosecutors revolt against MAGA attorney general's plan to arm felons

In an exceedingly rare split over guns, the Florida Prosecuting Attorneys Association filed a court brief Friday opposing Attorney General James Uthmeier’s new push to arm non-dangerous felons, the Florida Phoenix has learned.

The organization accused Uthmeier of using strained logic to justify his election-year decision to try to reverse a long-standing state law that denies gun ownership to anyone convicted of a felony.

“Prohibitions on the possession of firearms by convicted felons are consistent with the nation’s historical tradition,” the association wrote in its brief. “Any opinion to the contrary would result in needless uncertainty, confusion, and inconsistent application of the law.”

The state’s 20 elected prosecutors — 15 of whom are Republicans, like Uthmeier — are engaging in a remarkable dispute: They rarely ever head to court to oppose the attorney general over the issue of fighting crime.

Uthmeier, however, believes that non-dangerous felons should be able to possess guns. Only those involved in “potentially “potentially dangerous” activities or those that pose a public safety risk should have their guns taken away. Both violent offenses and drug crimes would fall under these categories, he argued.

“As noted in their brief, the FPAA does not speak for the State. That authority belongs exclusively to the Attorney General,” Jeremy Redfern, Uthmeier’s deputy chief of staff, told the Phoenix.

“The Attorney General has a duty to uphold the rights of the people, and it’s the State’s position that the Second Amendment rights of Floridians who pose no danger to the community should not be infringed.”

YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.

SUPPORT

The case is now before the Florida First District Court of Appeal, where the parties have filed briefs arguing over whether a swath of ex-convicts should be able to own guns.

It’s divided the legal bedfellows down the middle, creating an unusual triangulation: Uthmeier siding with the man he was prosecuting while the state’s attorneys urge the judge to oppose both.

They want Judge Stephen Everett to ignore Uthmeier’s claims and uphold the law as is.

Prosecutors argued Uthmeier’s decision is dangerous because it could create subjective, case-by-case arguments shifting from felon to felon. This could include wiggle room for violent felons convicted of lesser offenses, the prosecutors argue.

“From a constitutional perspective, all felons are dangerous felons,” FPPA wrote. Uthmeier’s attempt to parse which are dangerous and which are not is “contrived and forced,” and leads to “confusion,” they said.

How did it get here?

The differences evolved from a 2022 gun case centering on Christopher Michael Morgan, a felon convicted in Tallahassee for possessing a firearm. Morgan had been previously convicted in Pennsylvania of carrying a firearm without a permit, a third-degree felony in Pennsylvania.

Morgan has tried to appeal his case, and initially Uthmeier opposed him — opting to uphold state and federal law barring felons from owning guns.

But weeks later, Uthmeier reversed course.

He filed a new brief siding with Morgan, arguing felons who don’t pose a threat or “disturb the peace” should be able to carry under the Second Amendment. He employed a variety of case law, relying heavily on a group of 1600s English and colonial laws that preceded the Constitution and Reconstruction era laws banning drunkards and “tramps” from carrying.

Florida law does allow felons who have completed all terms of their sentence to apply to get their gun rights back, but that process only begins after a waiting period of at least eight years from the time of the completion of their sentence, the Phoenix previously reported.

Federal law also bans felons from possessing firearms.

But in 2024, a federal appeals court judge predicted that “[o]ne day — likely sooner, rather than later — the Supreme Court will address the constitutionality of Section 922(g)(1) or otherwise provide clearer guidance on whether felons are protected by the Second Amendment.”

Independent Journalism for All

As a nonprofit newsroom, our articles are free for everyone to access. Readers like you make that possible. Can you help sustain our watchdog reporting today?

SUPPORT

Florida Phoenix is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Florida Phoenix maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Michael Moline for questions: info@floridaphoenix.com.

‘Incoherent’: Ron DeSantis melts down at GOP sheriffs who dared oppose central policy

Gov. Ron DeSantis on Thursday bashed Republican sheriffs and police chiefs for planning to urge the Trump administration to create a citizenship path for crime-free undocumented immigrants, calling the move “incoherent” and ill-advised.

“This idea that unless you’re an axe murderer you should be allowed to stay, that is not consistent with our laws, and it’s also not good policy,” he said during a Bradenton press conference. “To send [Trump] a letter asking him to go back on his campaign policies, I would not advise that to be done.”

DeSantis referred to the Immigration Enforcement Council that he created last year. Made up of four sheriffs and four police chiefs, all appointed by state GOP leaders, the conservative hardliners are supposed to advise Florida officials on immigration happenings they witness on the ground.

But in a shock pivot from Florida’s strict, no-illegal immigration laws, at least six of the eight council-members brainstormed drafting a letter to Trump and congressional leaders urging the president to stop deporting undocumented immigrants who haven’t committed crimes, and instead seek a path to citizenship for them.

The idea was led by Polk County Sheriff Grady Judd, a favorite of DeSantis often called “America’s sheriff.” Judd — other than calling media reports of a break with DeSantis and Trump “not true” and “offensive” — doubled down a day later: “We need to find a path for them.”

Only one council member who was absent during Monday’s meeting, Jacksonville Sheriff T.K. Waters, has pushed back on resisting mass deportations.

Florida’s GOP divide on whether to deport all unauthorized immigrants reflects a quiet immigration policy shift seen at the national level. An adviser to Trump, who ran on an all-out mass deportation platform, privately told Republicans to stop talking about full-on deportations and instead only target violent offenders illegally in the country.

This followed a Politico poll finding that 49% of Americans believed Trump’s mass deportations “too aggressive.” It was published the same month that federal immigration authorities agents shot and killed two American protesters in Minnesota.

But that sentiment hasn’t made its way to DeSantis or Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier, architects of the “Alligator Alcatraz” detention center and strict enforcers of first-in-the-nation immigration laws.

“If people are here illegally, then they are breaking the law,” Uthmeier said yesterday.

DeSantis on Thursday agreed.

“[To say] you come illegally and then you stay until you commit a really violent crime — that just doesn’t work. It’s incoherent, and it’s not what the president ran on,” he said.

(Undocumented immigration is a civil matter.)

He harkened back to the slate of anti-illegal immigration bills he muscled through the Legislature last year. These required all counties to partner with ICE and empowered law enforcement to arrest undocumented immigrants in Florida on state charges (although a judge has blocked the latter portion).

“I called the special session of the Legislature to make sure that our state and local were assisting with these important federal efforts because I knew even Republican sheriffs, even people in police who are Republican, not everyone agreed with participation,” he said.

“I respect that. But I also know is my job as governor is to do what’s best for the people, not what any one person who gets elected in one county thinks. … We’ve got to keep the momentum going. We certainly don’t want to backtrack on this.”

Rebellion as Florida's GOP sheriffs urge Trump to drop fundamental MAGA policy

Florida’s Republican sheriffs want President Donald Trump to end mass deportations of undocumented immigrants who haven’t committed crimes, a striking shift from law enforcement in the nation’s most aggressive anti-undocumented immigration state.

“While Congress sits on their hands and does nothing about this, we are on the ground floor with this day in and day out — looking in the eyes of these folks that, yes, came here inappropriately. But some came here inappropriately only to do better for themselves and their family,” Polk County Sheriff Grady Judd said Monday during a State Immigration Enforcement Council meeting.

He plans to draft a letter to Trump, the U.S. House Speaker, and the Senate majority leader urging better guidelines over which undocumented immigrants should be targeted for deportation.

Judd’s comments are remarkable. A leading conservative, he’s also chair of the four-sheriff and four-police chief council tapped by Republican leaders last year to shape hardline immigration policy. He’s also a favorite of Gov. Ron DeSantis.

Although this is a drastic break with DeSantis — who for years has insisted that any migrant illegally in the country “needs to go”— Judd’s comments come days after the White House privately told Republicans to stop talking about mass deportations.

Judd added that a Florida Cabinet member had talked “about this kind of immigrant,” with Trump, who “was not anti-that conversation.”

At least six of the eight council members echoed Judd during Monday’s Microsoft Teams meeting. One said the state has cast “too wide of a net;” another urged Judd to write to Congress, and a third offered harsh criticisms of ICE tactics.

“I wholeheartedly agree that Congress, they need to get off their butts and they need to fix it,” Charlotte County Sheriff Bill Prummell agreed. “We’re not out … just raiding business and homes, but, unfortunately, when ICE gets involved, you have the collaterals.”

ICE and Border Patrol have shot 14 people in their quest to ramp up mass deportations, the main platform Trump ran on ahead of his second presidential term. At least two U.S citizens, both in Minnesota, were killed.

Both agencies are under the Department of Homeland Security. Until a few weeks ago, it was run by Kristi Noem — embattled by allegations of slow-walking disaster funds, misusing deportation dollars, and having an affair with a “special adviser.”

The sheriffs agreed Monday that they would jointly draft and edit the letter to Trump and Congress, imploring the administration to stop deporting undocumented immigrants without a criminal record.

Instead, Judd suggested, they could look at civil fines, demand they learn English, or disallow them from living off the taxpayer dime.

The Legislature created the Florida Immigration Enforcement Council last year to advise the newly-founded State Board of Immigration on enforcing immigration laws. The board comprises DeSantis and the Florida Cabinet — Attorney General James Uthmeier, Chief Financial Officer Blaise Ingoglia, and Agriculture Commissioner Wilton Simpson.

DeSantis, the Cabinet, Senate President Ben Albritton, and House Speaker Danny Perez appointed the eight sheriffs on the council.

The groups are part of a broader push by DeSantis to assert Florida as the top immigration enforcement state in the nation, as shown by its first-in-the nation “Alligator Alcatraz” detention center and status as the only state forcing all of its counties to partner with ICE.

“I don’t mean give [non-criminal immigrants] a free pass,” Judd said, listing potential smaller ways to punish undocumented immigrants, including making them put their kids in school.

“But we already know those people are doing that, and primarily going to Catholic Church … on Sunday. Those are the folks that we need in this country that we embrace,” he continued.

“We are a country of immigrants.”

Florida GOP sheriffs revolt against Trump and DeSantis’s mass deportation efforts

Florida’s Republican sheriffs want President Donald Trump to end mass deportations of undocumented immigrants who haven’t committed crimes, a striking shift from law enforcement in the nation’s most aggressive anti-undocumented immigration state.

“While Congress sits on their hands and does nothing about this, we are on the ground floor with this day in and day out — looking in the eyes of these folks that, yes, came here inappropriately. But some came here inappropriately only to do better for themselves and their family,” Polk County Sheriff Grady Judd said Monday during a State Immigration Enforcement Council meeting.

He plans to draft a letter to Trump, the U.S. House Speaker, and the Senate majority leader urging better guidelines over which undocumented immigrants should be targeted for deportation.

Judd’s comments are remarkable. A leading conservative, he’s also chair of the eight-sheriff council tapped by Republican leaders last year to shape hardline immigration policy. He’s also a favorite of Gov. Ron DeSantis.

Although this is a drastic break with DeSantis — who for years has insisted that any migrant illegally in the country “needs to go”— Judd’s comments come days after the White House privately told Republicans to stop talking about mass deportations.

Judd added that a Florida Cabinet member had talked “about this kind of immigrant,” with Trump, who “was not anti-that conversation.”

At least six of the eight sheriffs on the council echoed Judd during Monday’s Microsoft Teams meeting. One said the state has cast “too wide of a net;” another urged Judd to write to Congress, and a third offered harsh criticisms of ICE tactics.

“I wholeheartedly agree that Congress, they need to get off their butts and they need to fix it,” Charlotte County Sheriff Bill Prummell agreed. “We’re not out … just raiding business and homes, but, unfortunately, when ICE gets involved, you have the collaterals.”

ICE and Border Patrol have shot 14 people in their quest to ramp up mass deportations, the main platform Trump ran on ahead of his second presidential term. At least two U.S citizens, both in Minnesota, were killed.

Both agencies are under the Department of Homeland Security. Until a few weeks ago, it was run by Kristi Noem — embattled by allegations of slow-walking disaster funds, misusing deportation dollars, and having an affair with a “special adviser.”

The sheriffs agreed Monday that they would jointly draft and edit the letter to Trump and Congress, imploring the administration to stop deporting undocumented immigrants without a criminal record.

Instead, Judd suggested, they could look at civil fines, demand they learn English, or disallow them from living off the taxpayer dime.

The Legislature created the Florida Immigration Enforcement Council last year to advise the newly-founded State Board of Immigration on enforcing immigration laws. The board comprises DeSantis and the Florida Cabinet — Attorney General James Uthmeier, Chief Financial Officer Blaise Ingoglia, and Agriculture Commissioner Wilton Simpson.

DeSantis, the Cabinet, Senate President Ben Albritton, and House Speaker Danny Perez appointed the eight sheriffs on the council.

The groups are part of a broader push by DeSantis to assert Florida as the top immigration enforcement state in the nation, as shown by its first-in-the nation “Alligator Alcatraz” detention center and status as the only state forcing all of its counties to partner with ICE.

“I don’t mean give [non-criminal immigrants] a free pass,” Judd said, listing potential smaller ways to punish undocumented immigrants, including making them put their kids in school.

“But we already know those people are doing that, and primarily going to Catholic Church … on Sunday. Those are the folks that we need in this country that we embrace,” he continued.

“We are a country of immigrants.”

Independent Journalism for All

As a nonprofit newsroom, our articles are free for everyone to access. Readers like you make that possible. Can you help sustain our watchdog reporting today?

SUPPORT

Florida Phoenix is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Florida Phoenix maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Michael Moline for questions: info@floridaphoenix.com.

'Alligator Alcatraz' loses federal funding as environmental lawsuit looms

The federal government is withholding a $608 million grant to help pay for Florida’s migrant lockups because a required environmental review still hasn’t been completed, newly released records show.

The so-called “Alligator Alcatraz” and “Deportation Depot” centers were projected to cost $1.7 billion over two years, with Floridians expected to pay at least $1.1 billion, according to nearly 3,000 pages of emails and financial sheets reviewed by the Phoenix.

And costs could climb even higher if the federal environmental review continues to delay reimbursement.

On four separate occasions last year, the Federal Emergency Management Agency told state officials that it wouldn’t release the full $608.4 million grant award until an Environmental and Historic Preservation (EHP) review was finalized. FEMA even formally denied a state funding request in December, citing the unfinished review.

State officials say the review, which is being conducted by the feds, is “in progress.” FEMA couldn’t be reached for comment because of the partial federal government shutdown.

“Completing the EHP study is part of the reimbursement process and we continue to work with our federal partners to be compliant and complete all requirements to expedite the process,” Stephanie Hartman, communications director for the Florida Division of Emergency Management (DEM), told the Phoenix. She didn’t know when that would happen.

These new revelations are key to a pending lawsuit brought by environmental groups in which the state claimed that federal environmental restrictions don’t apply to the detention centers because they don’t use federal dollars or oversight.

DEM was forced to turn over these records to the plaintiffs as part of this suit. Groups like the Friends of the Everglades had demanded to know the exact dates that federal authorities and state officials agreed on the multi-million dollar grant.

“The records confirm what Friends of the Everglades has maintained from the outset: This is a federal immigration detention facility, conceived and constructed on the promise of federal funding,” Paul Schwiep, attorney for that organization, said in an email to the Phoenix. “Attempting to delay federal reimbursement to sidestep compliance with federal environmental law is gamesmanship — and will not work.”

The records help explain why Florida has yet to see a dime of federal money despite assurances it had been approved for the grant in September.

The records also highlight a contradiction in the state’s messaging:

  • Publicly, Florida officials have dismissed the need to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) because they say “Alligator Alcatraz” has received no federal funding and is entirely state-run. Executive Director Kevin Guthrie claimed the Justice Department was the agency tying up the funds.
  • Privately, the correspondence shows, the agency knows why it hasn’t been paid: The federal government believes NEPA, through the environmental review, may apply to the state.

The review is a mandatory process that ensures federally funded projects comply with environmental laws like NEPA, the Clean Water Act, and the Endangered Species Act.

$390 million in four months …

The revelations come as Florida lawmakers debate how to replenish the state’s emergency response fund, which expired Feb. 17 after legislators failed to agree on how much to spend on immigration enforcement.

Now that the fund is gone, Gov. Ron DeSantis would need legislative approval to quickly access emergency dollars for future disasters, such as hurricanes.

The fund, created in 2022 for immediate disaster relief, was opened to anti-immigration enforcement when DeSantis declared a state of emergency for immigration in January 2023. The state has drawn $573 million from the trust since then specifically for immigration actions.

Of that amount, the state spent $405 million in the past six months, including for private jet flights, restaurant meals, and legal fees.

The newly released records reveal even more spending, showing that although earlier media reports had calculated Alligator Alcatraz’s one-year price tag at between $250 million and $450 million, the center actually cost $390.2 million during its first four months of operation.

Projections by DEM revealed that the agency anticipated spending as much as $1.7 billion between June 2025 and July 2027 on the detention centers, although a spokesperson has claimed revised projections are much lower.

‘Designated recipient of FEMA grant funding’

Alligator Alcatraz, located in the Everglades, has drawn a number of lawsuits, including allegations of human rights violations and flouting of state-level laws.

At the same time, critics have attacked the center as an environmental nightmare since its June 19 creation.

The state drew a lawsuit from the Friends of the Everglades, the Miccosukee Tribe, EarthJustice, and Center for Biological Diversity days after construction began for allegedly violating NEPA. This federal law requires agencies to review environmental consequences before a project can be approved.

The DeSantis administration said it wasn’t using federal dollars so it didn’t have to comply. Although it won the suit, the state announced days later — on Sep. 15 — that it had applied for federal funding.

But a very different scene was playing out behind closed doors:

Florida had not applied for funding in September after all.

Instead, the state helped FEMA draft the grant language itself as early as June and initially applied for the program on Aug. 7, as the Tributary first reported. Records show the feds curated the program specifically for DEM.

“[DEM] is the designated recipient of FEMA grant funding, including my parallel role as the State Administrative Agent for all DHS domestic security funding,” Guthrie wrote on June 24, responding to a confused Miami ICE agent wondering which Florida agency the grant should be made out to.

“I am the designated state coordinating officer, governor’s authorized representative, and as indicated the state administrative agent,” he said.

The $608.4 million grant — called the Detention Support Grant Program — Florida was approved for on Sep. 30 was co-written by DEM and FEMA agents dating to at least June 23. Repeatedly, officials from both agencies traded emails back-and-forth with different draft grant versions, asking for “edits” and “input.”

But that wasn’t enough to get around environmental law.

In September, FEMA agents expressed concern about environmental issues getting in the way of grant disbursement.

“We still haven’t received the greenlight from our Department’s general counsel given the environmental nexus, but I expect that will be soon,” Stacey Street, FEMA’s deputy assistant administrator for grant programs, wrote on Sep. 27. A day later, she said that although she sensed “This is close to 100%…we are awaiting final steer from our DHS general counsel on the environmental litigation matter.”

Six months later, the review remains unfinished.

On Dec. 10, FEMA denied DEM’s $30 million payment request because the environmental review still wasn’t complete. Days earlier, state officials argued the review was unnecessary because Alligator Alcatraz is “not a permanent structure.”

The $608 million reimbursement, if received, would not cover any construction or modification costs. And until an environmental review comes through, the money won’t come at all.

'He does not deserve this honor': Tensions erupt over plans for Charlie Kirk Day

A debate on racism, sexism, and in-context quotations erupted Tuesday over a bill that would make Charlie Kirk only the second person — after Ronald Reagan — to be comemmorated in Florida statute.

Republican Sen. Jonathan Martin would memorialize Kirk’s birthday, Oct. 14, as “Charlie Kirk Day of Remembrance.” It comes three months after Kirk, a 31-year-old podcaster and right-wing debater, was assassinated while speaking at Utah Valley University.

It would slate him alongside Reagan as the only two people to have a special observance day in Florida law. Unlike holidays, observance days don’t allow for time off from school or work, and are generally just a day of recognition for a figure or event.

“I think that anybody who saw the video of Charlie Kirk getting — at his last speech, his last rally … ” Martin said before the Senate Governmental Oversight and Accountability Committee, appearing to get choked up as he took a lengthy pause and cleared his throat. “… Would agree that it’s important to remember somebody who lived a peaceful life.”

He continued, “I think that Ronald Reagan would be 100% OK with a Charlie Kirk Remembrance Day in the state of Florida.”

Following Kirk’s assassination on Sep. 10, Vice President J.D. Vance canceled his 9/11 memorial visit to fly out west. A week later, President Donald Trump and top Cabinet members spoke at his memorial service, held at the State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona.

The political ramifications were massive. Teachers nationwide were suspended or fired for either applauding Kirk’s death or publicly claiming he was hateful. Some in the Trump administration, along with all of the Florida Cabinet, supported visa revocations for visa holders celebrating his death.

In Florida, pro-Kirk bills flooded in. Aside from Martin’s legislation, Rep. Kevin Steele — a candidate for chief financial officer — is sponsoring a measure to rename a road at every state university after Kirk. Sen. Ana Maria Rodriguez and Rep. Juan Porras have proposed a “Charlie Kirk Memorial Avenue” in Miami-Dade County. And Rep. Yvette Benarroch is carrying an identical form of Martin’s bill in the House.

‘Does not deserve the honor’

Although Martin emphasized that his bill was designed to signal to Floridians that political violence is wrong, Democrats raised serious concerns about some of Kirk’s comments — which Martin claimed were “spliced” and out-of-context.

They included quotes deriding Michelle Obama, Joy Reid, Sheila Jackson Lee, and Ketanji Brown Jackson as lacking “the brain processing power” to be taken seriously; claiming “prowling Blacks” target white Americans; questioning whether certain Black people received a job because of affirmative action; asking Taylor Swift to “submit” to Travis Kelce; and suggesting some gun deaths might be worth it to keep the Second Amendment “to protect our other God-given rights.”

“If you have to go through such mental and verbal gymnastics to explain away what this man said, how does he deserve a day of remembrance?” Sen. Tina Polsky asked.

“He was a provocateur. He was a podcaster. He did go on these college campuses, and it’s great that he was debating with people — that’s what we do all the time, that’s fine. But he’s still responsible for his own statements, no matter how you try to justify it,” she continued. “He does not deserve this honor.”

The bill passed along party lines, and will advance to the Education Postsecondary Committee.

“I went back and watched the debates,” Martin said. “If you look at the context, there’s not a single thing that he said that would disgust any reasonable American. … I don’t arrive at the same conclusion that those in the media that were trying to attack Charlie arrived at.”