GOP fights for MN House as second Dem candidate faces residency challenge

Minnesota Democrats are already embroiled in an ugly battle for control of the state House after a judge ruled one of their newly elected members was ineligible to hold office for not living in the district he won.

Now, another Democratic candidate faces a residency challenge, but this time in the race for the Senate District 60 seat to replace former Majority Leader Kari Dzeidzic, who died of cancer last month, leaving the Senate tied 33-33.

Mohamed Jama, a potential top contender in a crowded special election to represent the safely Democratic district in northeast Minneapolis and Cedar-Riverside, likely does not meet the residency requirements according to state voter data.

Sonia Neculescu, a former DFL House candidate and resident of the district, filed a challenge to his candidacy with the state Supreme Court on Monday alleging Jama registered to vote on Election Day in neighboring Senate District 63 in November.

Under state law, candidates must live in the district they’re running to represent for at least six months prior to the election.

Jama did not immediately return a voicemail seeking comment.

Jama listed his address as “private” on his filing for candidacy, although all candidates must sign an affidavit that they meet the residency requirements.

According to Neculescu’s challenge, the Senate DFL Caucus campaign reached out to Jama’s campaign manager, Jacob Hooper, on Jan. 2 to confirm that he met the residency requirements.

Hooper replied that Jama has lived in Senate District 60 for six months but is not registered to vote there.

“He did vote in 2024 but used old address because this was during process of moving,” Hooper wrote, according to the challenge.

But that defense raises the prospect that Jama illegally voted where he doesn’t live.

Neculescu is asking the state Supreme Court to declare Jama ineligible to hold the office and direct the county to not print ballots with his name on them.

The dispute over Jama’s residency could delay the special primary scheduled for Jan. 14 and the special election for Jan. 28, though challenging Jama’s residency before the party endorsement and primary election saves Democrats from potentially repeating the embarrassing mistake they made in Johnson’s race of backing an ineligible candidate.

Jama’s campaign website describes him as a “community leader, passionate grassroots organizer and relentless housing advocate.”

Before running for office, he co-founded the Cedar Riverside Youth Council and served on the boards of the West Bank Community Coalition and the Neighborhood Revitalization Program.

In 2014, he was part of a brawl at a DFL caucus event in Cedar-Riverside that sent then-party activist Ilhan Omar to the hospital with a concussion, according to a MinnPost story from the time. Jama alleged Omar slapped him, which Omar denied, saying a group of women attacked her.

Fury as low-income families lose tax refunds to tutors kids couldn't understand

In March 2023, Abdijalil Sheik-Yusuf went before the Minnesota Senate Taxes Committee with a critical plea.

Not enough parents could take advantage of a state tax credit for low-income families for tutoring services from companies like his, Success Tutoring.

“What we have here is not an achievement gap, we have an opportunity gap. We have students who are not able to get the help that they need because the parents cannot afford it,” Sheik-Yusuf said.

Sheik-Yusuf, wearing a plum-colored suit and Louis Vuitton scarf, said Success Tutoring had helped hundreds of students overcome the “literacy curve.” And they could help even more disadvantaged students if lawmakers would support a bill to raise the income ceiling and increase the amount of the credit.

“There’s a saying that we used to use in the classroom: Today’s reader is tomorrow’s leader. If we invest in education, it’s an investment in the child’s future,” Sheik-Yusuf said.

Sheik-Yusuf’s testimony was well received by both parties, who’ve long supported the K-12 Education Credit. The bill was folded into a larger tax package and passed with little attention. In fact, it was one of the few noncontroversial items of the 2023 session, when the Democratic trifecta passed a sweeping progressive agenda.

What lawmakers were unaware of at the time were the many disgruntled parents who say Success Tutoring and a related company called Achievers Tutoring outsource instruction to foreign teachers online whom their kids couldn’t understand.

Nor did lawmakers anticipate the outrage those parents would feel when they would later find thousands of dollars missing from their tax refunds to pay debts to Success Tutoring and Achievers Tutoring for services they say their kids barely used and didn’t benefit from.

The allegations surrounding the K-12 Education Credit come amid a larger crisis of fraud in state government, with hundreds of millions of dollars allegedly siphoned away from programs supposed to fund child nutrition, autism services, transportation and interpretation assistance.

The bill to increase spending on the tax credit was authored by Rep. Matt Norris, DFL-Blaine, who prior to his election to the Legislature, founded Minnesota Afterschool Advance to help more people use the credit. The organization, a collaboration between Venn Foundation and Youthprise, gives families zero-interest loans to pay for tutoring, music lessons or driver’s ed and collects the money from their tax refund. Norris helped grow the program to $1.8 million in funding for educational programs in 2022, according to his campaign website.

Norris had lobbied lawmakers for years to raise the income threshold and, after being elected in 2022, it was one of the first bills he authored. The bill (HF915) expanded the tax credit from $1,000 to $1,500 per child and more than doubled the income threshold to $70,000, with higher earners eligible for a smaller credit. The bill also tied the income threshold to inflation, so it may increase every year.

After the law passed, state spending on the credit more than doubled, from $5.3 million in 2022 to $13.7 million in 2023.

Norris, who left Minnesota Afterschool Advance when he entered the Legislature, says he was unaware until recently of the mothers’ complaints — and debt.

Lul Mohamud’s story

Lul Mohamud learned about free tutoring help for her four children at the mosque she attended, Dar Al-Farooq, in Bloomington one day in summer 2022.

After prayer time, three men told the congregation that they could get their children back on track after the pandemic caused so many to fall behind in reading and math. The tutoring was completely free for low-income parents, she recalled them saying.

Mohamud said a mosque leader who previously ran the youth program encouraged families to sign up. So did members of a group that she respected called the Muslim Coalition.

“They were introduced at the mosque as good people so I trusted them,” Mohamud said in an interview in Somali through an interpreter. “(They) said if you don’t help your kids, your kids will fall behind.”

As she was leaving the mosque, the men were standing outside the exit signing people up, and she gave one of the men her phone number. The man called her later that day. She gave him her Social Security number, and he gave her an address in Bloomington.

Mohamud says she didn’t bring her kids to begin tutoring until some months later, as school was getting back into session. She went to the address of a nondescript, three-story office building. It wasn’t at all like she pictured. It was a small office space without any clues that children learned there — no chalkboard or textbooks.

A representative for Achievers Tutoring said she would need to buy $50 laptops for each of her kids, ranging from kindergarten to eighth grade, to do the tutoring online. Mohamud didn’t have $200 for four computers — the man only accepted cash — but she was able to get two. Her two other kids could use the laptops they had from school.

Mohamud said he directed them to go to another address in Bloomington the following week for online tutoring sessions.

But that turned out to be no more promising. Instead of teachers, there were half a dozen or so young men there, scrolling on TikTok. One directed her to set up the laptops for the kids to use and told her she could leave and come back later to pick them up.

“When I saw the place, I determined it wasn’t a place I could leave my children alone,” Mohamud said.

She stayed, and watched her kids log into a virtual class with an instructor whom she believes was in another country. Mohamud speaks Somali and only a little English, but her kids are native English speakers and said they couldn’t understand the teacher. After about 40 minutes, the lesson was over.

It seemed like a joke, but Mohamud said she tried bringing them back one more time. After that, she decided to pull her kids out. She went back the next week to return the laptops, both of which had already stopped working.

Months later came a horrible surprise — thousands of dollars were taken out of her tax refund to pay for the two subpar tutoring sessions. Her refund wasn’t enough to cover the entire expense, so she went into debt.

Mohamud had signed up with a company called Achievers Tutoring, a company created in 2021 by Osman Sheik-Yusuf, who shares a last name with Abdijalil Sheik-Yusuf, the Success Tutoring founder, according to records from the Minnesota Secretary of State. (The men did not answer a question from the Reformer on how they’re related).

Both companies were registered with the same business address in Bloomington. Both companies have nearly identical websites offering online courses in math, English, coding and public speaking. Both boast “975+ satisfied students, 150+ teachers and 27+ years in experience.” And both websites have identical testimonials from four satisfied individuals all named “Griffin Wooldridge” with different stock images.

When sent a list of questions by the Reformer, both companies sent nearly identical statements with the same lawyer copied on the email.

The statements say Osman Sheik-Yusuf and Abdijalil Sheik-Yusuf launched their respective companies to help students of color overcome the achievement gap.

“For those who have not received the credit, we encourage them to Adhere to the guidelines set by the Minnesota Department of Revenue and Minnesota Afterschool Advance,” the statement from Osman Sheik-Yusuf said.

Abdijalil Sheik-Yusuf, when asked again about the list of questions sent by the Reformer, wrote “We compliance (sic) with all guidelines.”

Mohamud says dozens of Somali mothers who signed up for tutoring services with the two companies have formed a WhatsApp group to try to help one another. Eighteen moms shared their stories with Sahan Journal, which first reported complaints about Success Tutoring.

The companies promote their services on social media, mostly in Somali. In one TikTok video for Success Tutoring, Abdijalil Sheik-Yusuf sports a large gold watch and tells viewers from a black SUV that the only thing parents need to make their children successful is to sign up for Success Tutoring. In another video for Achievers Tutoring, Osman Sheik-Yusuf flashes the peace sign from a Tesla Cybertruck.

The two men also posted videos with grinning parents and children holding certificates, saying they’ve caught up to grade level in math and reading.

In a June 2023 letter, the Minnesota Department of Revenue told Mohamud she was being audited because of the $3,000 she claimed for the K-12 Education Credit.

The agency requested a dizzying number of documents showing what programs her children were enrolled in, the dates her children met with a qualified instructor and the type of tutoring they received.

They wanted to see that she had paid for 25% of the tutoring services, as required by state law, and the contract she supposedly entered into with Minnesota Afterschool Advance. They also wanted her children’s birth certificates and school records or medical bills showing she is their guardian.

Mohamud was overwhelmed. The letter was in English, not Somali. They were also asking for things she never had: She didn’t sign a contract; she said she gave her information over the phone. She didn’t have a receipt for what she paid; she was told it was free. She didn’t have verification that the instructor was qualified; she didn’t know the teacher’s full name.

With her tax credit claim denied, in September, she received a letter from the Department of Revenue saying the entirety of her state tax refund — $2,418.43 — was used to pay for her debt to Minnesota Afterschool Advance, which had advanced the money to Achievers Tutoring.

Like most low-income parents, Mohamud was counting on her tax refund — bolstered by the child tax credit — to pay for necessities and a trip to Texas with her family.

It didn’t just happen once. The next year, in 2024, more of her tax refund disappeared.

The Reformer interviewed two other women who enrolled their kids in Success Tutoring and whose stories are strikingly similar to Mohamud’s experience with Achievers Tutoring: They gave their Social Security numbers over the phone for supposedly free tutoring that would help their children recover from pandemic learning loss. Then, they got cheap laptops for the online sessions.

Raho Hussein said her 10th grader, a native English speaker, was put in a tutoring session where the instructor was teaching “ABCs” and “1-2-3’s.” Sometimes the instructor didn’t show up at all. She had thousands of dollars taken from her tax return.

So did another mom, Sawda Ali, for her four kids. She said she only intended to sign up her two oldest children but she was also charged for tutoring for her 3-year-old and 4-year-old even though they are too young and never attended tutoring.

The women also said their kids, who are native English speakers, couldn’t understand their instructors because of their heavy accents. They looked Asian, and the mothers believed they were in a foreign country.

Tutoring from the Philippines

Julieross Elveña, an Achievers Tutoring instructor based in the Philippines, said she was recruited through a Facebook page for Filipino freelancers about four years ago.

She spoke to a Reformer reporter who logged into her virtual classroom one evening this month through a publicly available link on the Achievers Tutoring website. The Reformer also entered two other virtual classrooms, both led by instructors based in the Philippines.

The instructors aren’t licensed to teach in Minnesota, although at least two do have baccalaureate degrees according to their LinkedIn profiles.

Elveña spoke with clear English, which is one of the official languages of the Philippines, although the other two instructors the Reformer spoke to had thicker accents.

She said she has 17 students with Achievers, who are divided into two groups she meets with twice a week. She said she’s mostly there to answer questions as the kids work through online modules in reading and math.

Elveña has been able to help students catch up to grade-level in reading and math, some more quickly than others, she said.

“I do love teaching,” she said.

She said she gets paid $4.50 per hour.

“It’s not that much I guess compared to if I work in Minnesota,” Elveña said, laughing.

Achievers Tutoring charges parents $166 per month per child for two subjects, according to the company’s website. Contracts posted to Success Tutoring’s website start at $150 per month, with a three-month minimum and no refunds.

Parents are also charged for tutoring regardless of whether children actually attend, according to contracts available on both companies’ websites.

Refunds denied

Mohamud and the other mothers have been trying for months to get their money back. She started with Osman Sheik-Yusuf, who she says told her he would get the necessary paperwork to the state authorities.

Had he done so, taxpayers would have underwritten the unsatisfactory tutoring services.

So long as parents submit paperwork showing the educational expenses qualified for the tax credit, the state pays for 75% of the cost. But if the expenses are not qualified, or paperwork is missing, the funds are paid back through the parents’ tax refund.

Because the process is so complicated, Minnesota Afterschool Advance advertises free tax preparation help to families who take out loans for tutoring with them.

It’s unclear how much Achievers and Success have received from state funds. The Minnesota Department of Education certifies tutoring companies for the tax credit program but doesn’t track how much tutoring companies are paid. The Department of Revenue only provided the total amount claimed under the credit, but said they don’t know how much was paid to individual tutors or lenders like Minnesota Afterschool Advance because it comes from individuals’ tax returns, which are private.

Mohamud said Osman Sheik-Yusuf stopped returning her calls, so she went to another man she knew to complain. But he blocked her number.

She and other moms complained about the men on social media and warned others not to use their services. That seemed to motivate Osman Sheik-Yusuf to resolve their complaints: the Venn Foundation contacted her with a form that would give them business power of attorney to represent her before the Department of Revenue. But she wasn’t sure what the form meant and was by that point too distrustful to sign anything she didn’t understand.

Mohamud says Osman Sheik-Yusuf also asked for a meeting with her and an imam at the Dar Al-Farooq mosque to mediate the dispute. But she says it ended with Sheik-Yusuf insulting her with a pejorative for a rural, uneducated person. Mohamud says she and her children no longer go to the Dar Al-Farooq mosque, having lost faith in its leaders.

A spokesperson for Dar Al-Farooq denied that an imam ever mediated a dispute at the mosque with a parent and Osman Sheik-Yusuf. Mohamud shared screenshots of text messages between her, Sheik-Yusuf and a religious leader connected to the mosque.

The spokesperson for Dar Al-Farooq also denied representatives from the companies ever addressed the congregation and said the mosque has “no formal or informal ties” with Osman and Abdijalil Sheik-Yusuf.

The Dar Al-Farooq spokesperson also sent a recent article on Somali Media MN, however, promoting Success Tutoring, saying it would provide “valuable context for your story” including the “systemic challenges minority families face … accessing the education tax credit.”

While the mosque claims it has no ties with Osman Sheik-Yusuf and Abdijalil Sheik-Yusuf, the two appeared in a video promoting their services as recently as last month with a man who is the board secretary for Dar Al-Farooq, also known as the Al Jazari Institute, according to the organization’s most recently available tax filing. The man is also a lead organizer for ISAIAH’s Muslim Coalition, the group that Mohamud trusted.

Asked about the video, the spokesperson for Dar Al-Farooq said the man was there in his “personal capacity.”

Mohamud and other Somali mothers said they sent a letter to Attorney General Keith Ellison in April but have yet to hear back. The Attorney General’s Office did not respond to requests for comment about whether they’re investigating the mother’s complaints.

This year, after Mohamud’s tax return was garnished again, she and the other mothers became more assertive.

They went on a Somali-language YouTube channel to warn other families not to sign up for the services, after which she says she and the other women received threatening phone calls. They filed a police report in Minneapolis, but the case went nowhere. A spokesman for the police department said the case is inactive.

They went to the Department of Revenue and were advised to call a consumer complaint line. They had already done that, too.

Mohamud had met with former Rep. Hodan Hassan, a Democrat from Minneapolis, who had helped her find the address for the Venn Foundation. So she and seven other moms went to the address, which turned out to be the home of Venn Foundation Director Jeff Ochs. (Hassan did not return calls or an email seeking comment.)

That was in the summer, and while he seemed helpful, the women still haven’t been made whole.

“We have gone everywhere looking for assistance,” Mohamud said.

In response to an interview request, Minnesota Afterschool Advance Director Erin Martin shared a joint statement with its parent organizations Youthprise and Venn Foundation saying they have a formal process for families with concerns.

“When there are breakdowns in the system that ultimately result in MAA families not receiving the (Minnesota Education Tax Credit) and instead repaying MAA from their normal tax refund, we understand and share their frustration,” the statement said.

“MAA is actively working with a number of stakeholders, including Minnesota Department of Revenue and a local faith leader, to understand and help address the concerns of a group of families, as well as to work on improving the overall (Minnesota Education Tax Credit) and assignment system for all involved moving forward.”

Mohamud said there have been three meetings with a different imam and representatives from Minnesota Afterschool Advance, but they’ve since broken down.

Martin testified before the Legislature in support of the bill expanding eligibility for the credit in March 2023, even holding up Abdijalil Sheik-Yusuf’s Success Tutoring as an example of one of the many Black-owned organizations they partner with that provide “culturally relevant” services to low-income students in “new and creative ways.”

Asked if Minnesota Afterschool Advance still works with Success Tutoring and Achievers Tutoring, a spokeswoman said the businesses “are not an offering on MAA’s menu of available service providers.”

A spokesperson for the Minnesota Department of Education would not say if the agency is investigating Success Tutoring and Achievers Tutoring, saying only the companies are no longer certified as eligible to be paid through the tax credit. Certification expires after two years, and there are only five providers currently certified, according to the Department of Education. That means many providers on MAA’s menu are not certified.

Youthprise spokeswoman Lynne Matthews also said Minnesota Afterschool Advance will periodically visit tutoring sites in person. If their expectations are not being met those tutors could be removed from their services menu, she said.

Asked if the organization would make the mothers whole, Matthews wrote, “Despite having no responsibility or legal obligation to do so, MAA wants to do what it can to help ease the burden that families may be experiencing as a result of systems failure, in certain circumstances.”

A spokesperson for the Department of Revenue did not say if the agency is investigating Success Tutoring and Achievers Achievers, saying the agency can’t comment on specific cases. The spokesperson said they had met with “multiple taxpayers” with concerns about the tax credit.

“We are working with all parties involved to ensure specifics of the program are being properly communicated,” spokesman Ryan Brown wrote in an email.

Tutoring companies continue expansions

The tax credit remains popular with key legislators, including Republicans. Rep. Kristin Robbins, R-Maple Grove, was one of the architects of the credit when it was created in 1997 as the head of a group called Minnesotans for School Choice. Robbins and Norris, who expanded the credit’s use as the head of Minnesota Afterschool Advance, defended its value despite allegations of misuse.

“Regardless of the issue with Success Tutoring, this is a tax credit that serves tens of thousands of families across the state,” Norris said. “And the income limit and the credit limit hadn’t been updated in over 25 years.”

Norris said he didn’t have enough information to say what the state should do to ensure low-income families aren’t losing their tax refunds to pay for substandard tutoring, but said it is something that should be looked at.

Robbins called the women’s experience “terrible” and was surprised to learn that it was possible for non-government organizations like Minnesota Afterschool Advance to be repaid from parents’ tax refunds and other credits — like the child tax credit and earned income tax credit — if the Education Tax Credit wasn’t awarded by the Department of Revenue.

She said that wasn’t the case when she advocated for its creation in the 1990s and she said she’s troubled by the existence of middlemen like Minnesota Afterschool Advance who have a claim to parents’ entire returns.

“If there’s a loophole that says they can claw back from other parts of the tax return, that should not be,” Robbins said. “If the tutoring service doesn’t provide the service and the family wants to withhold the payment, then that’s something the family and the tutoring service have to work out.”

Meanwhile, Mohamud and the other mothers say they continue to receive threatening phone calls and text messages from anonymous numbers for speaking out about their experiences.

And Achievers Tutoring and Success Tutoring continue to recruit families to their services.

Achievers Tutoring recently posted a video on TikTok and Facebook, which was shared by Success Tutoring, with Osman and Abdijalil Sheik-Yusuf meeting with an imam at the mosque and lead organizer with ISAIAH’s Muslim Coalition.

They were in Columbus, Ohio, promoting their tutoring services to families there. Ohio’s program that funds tutoring services is easier to navigate, according to the article shared by Dar Al-Farooq in its email to the Reformer.

The men asked viewers to come to the Minnesota Capitol in January for Youth Day to advocate for making tutoring funding easier to access.

“We need to make the funding accessible. We need to make the funding something that is practically usable,” Abdijalil Sheik-Yusuf said in Somali.

Reporting and interpreting contributed by Kayseh Magan.

'Looks pretty bad': Judge says Minnesota GOP House candidate lied on search warrant

A Republican candidate for a state House seat who is running on his experience in law enforcement was excoriated by a state judge last fall for “intentionally or recklessly mischaracterizing the truth” on a pair of affidavits in a felony drug case.

House candidate Bidal Duran was a deputy with the Hubbard County Sheriff’s Office last year, when he requested permission to search the cell phones of two men arrested during a traffic stop that turned up a large quantity of meth and thousands in cash.

Duran first said the suspects were pulled over in a routine speed trap on a quiet county road but later said he was tipped off by a confidential informant, leading the judge to deny the search warrant and accuse him of “lying” about the existence of the informant.

“The conduct of Agent Duran could be insidious and has hopefully not spread to other officers in the Hubbard County Sheriff’s Office,” Minnesota Ninth District Court Judge Eric Schieferdecker warned in an Oct. 2 judgment.

The denial led to the drug case falling apart, and Duran was investigated for misconduct after the judge’s order. The disciplinary investigation ultimately cleared Duran of violating department policy, but details of the investigation raised questions about Duran’s thoroughness and work-ethic as a law enforcement officer.

Last fall, Duran was also given a written reprimand for turning off his body camera twice during an interaction with a member of the public, who told investigators Duran threatened them with jail unless they answered his questions.

Duran’s employment with Hubbard County was terminated last month. The county and Duran declined to say why, but Minnesota House Republican Campaign Committee spokesman Andrew Wagner said it was part of a medical retirement.

“For the past 9 months, I have been pursuing a medical retirement. During this extensive process, I exhausted the entirety of my medical leave, and as a result was terminated from employment,” Duran said in a statement shared by Wagner.

Duran is a Marine corps veteran who was deployed on a combat mission to Afghanistan in 2010, according to his campaign website. He became a police officer for the city of Bemidji in 2013 and then joined the Hubbard County Sheriff’s Office in 2020.

Duran is favored to beat Democrat Reed Olson, a restaurateur, homeless shelter operator and former Beltrami County commissioner in the Republican-leaning House District 2A that covers a large stretch of northern Minnesota from Bemidji to the Canadian border.

Voters in the district elected outgoing Republican Rep. Matt Grossell four times, even after he entered into a court diversion program following a drunken incident at a St. Paul hotel bar.

Olson said in a statement that he is a firm believer in the Constitution and its protections against unwarranted search and seizure: “A violation of anyone’s rights is a potential violation of everyone’s rights.”

‘It looks pretty bad’

Duran, who served on the Paul Bunyan Drug Task Force, started his quest for a search warrant after two other deputies stopped a vehicle on a rural road near Park Rapids in late December 2022 for going 33 mph in a 30-mph zone.

Deputies smelled marijuana and searched the vehicle, finding 118 grams of purported meth, 15 grams of marijuana and $7,292 cash. Law enforcement believed the men were on a mission to sell the meth, and Duran wanted the judge to allow him to search their cell phones.

In his first search warrant application in March 2023, Duran said the two men were caught in a speed trap that the sheriff’s deputies set up because of community complaints about speeding.

Schieferdecker denied Duran full access to the suspects phones because police didn’t have enough probable cause. Instead he granted a narrow warrant to access the phone’s web history, search history and location data, according to court records.

A few months later in June, Duran resubmitted the search warrant seeking all the communications on the cell phones. This time, he included new information about a confidential informant, who had tipped him off to a driver bringing large amounts of drugs to the area.

This affidavit aligned with what Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Agent Dan Skoog, who was also involved in the stop, would say during a later investigation: that the car was pulled over because of information Duran said he had from a confidential informant, not from a speed trap.

Schieferdecker, apparently surprised by the existence of a confidential informant, circled the paragraphs about the informant and asked Duran over email if he had this information when he wrote the first affidavit and if the speed trap was set up because of that information. Duran emailed back “yes” to both questions.

“I had previously advised you not to jerk me around about on probable cause in search warrants. That had no effect on your practices. I am very disappointed,” Schieferdecker replied, according to an email thread included in the disciplinary investigation.

He said Duran would have to submit all of his search warrants to the sheriff before he would review them and would inform other judges and the suspect’s attorney about his concerns.

Months later, in his October order denying the search warrant, Schieferdecker wrote that the omission of the confidential informant made him unsure if there were even more details left out of either affidavit about the traffic stop. After Duran submitted his first search warrant, Scheiferdecker asked him if he had included all of his probable cause, and Duran said yes.

“Intentionally misleading the Court in pursuit of a search warrant is extremely serious and inexcusable,” Schieferdecker wrote.

After Schieferdecker’s order denying the search warrant, the Hubbard County Attorney’s Office dropped felony charges of methamphetamine possession or sale and driving while intoxicated.

“It looks pretty bad on my behalf,” Duran said in an interview with the Reformer.

But Duran said there’s more to the story. He told the Reformer to ask the Hubbard County Attorney’s Office what legal advice they gave him.

“Because if I was given bad advice and I was told to move forward with the search warrants .. is that me?” Duran said.

Duran would not elaborate on what that advice was. Asked if the prosecutor told him not to mention the confidential informant at first, Duran said there was “no need to because the information provided during that case did not need for that.”

Hubbard County Attorney Jonathan Frieden did not respond to requests for comment on what legal advice he provided Duran. He told the officer in charge of investigating Duran for misconduct that his office did not review the first warrant application but did review the second warrant, to which he added detail.

Duran also suggested digging deeper into why the judge ruled the way he did, as well as “the judge’s history.”

“Then we can actually have a real good conversation once you get all the facts straight,” Duran said.

The candidate didn’t elaborate on the judge’s “history,” and said he would share his side of the story after the Reformer found out more information. Then he said goodbye and hung up.

Investigation finds no policy violations

Following the judgment, the Hubbard County Sheriff’s Office opened a misconduct investigation into Duran.

The investigative file isn’t public under Minnesota law because the complaint didn’t result in discipline, but the file was shared with the Reformer by Wagner, the Minnesota House GOP campaign spokesman.

Wagner pointed out that the review, which was conducted by an outside investigator with the Becker County Sheriff’s Office, determined Duran didn’t do anything wrong.

But the investigation also revealed sloppy police work and poor communication, and the investigator said he understood why Schieferdecker would feel Duran was not being truthful, even if he did not intentionally lie.

Frieden, the Hubbard County attorney, and Assistant County Attorney Jonathan Olson, who was the lead prosecutor on the drug case, told the investigator the first warrant application looked like it was copied and pasted from other police reports.

They said they thought Duran “was being somewhat lazy and not wanting to fully complete his work and not wanting to add more detail into the warrant application.”

Frieden and Olson also said they had concerns with other warrant submissions from Duran and had previously talked to him about being more transparent and specific. Still, they said they didn’t believe Duran did anything wrong.

Skoog, the BCA agent who was involved in the stop, told the investigator that police commonly leave confidential informants off of search warrant applications.

The investigator also interviewed the Paul Bunyon Task Force commander at the time, Joe Klezyzk, who also said task force officers commonly withhold information about a confidential informant on a search warrant unless the deputy is specifically asked if there is an informant involved.

After Duran submitted his first affidavit, Schieferdecker did email him to ask, “Is this the entirety of your [probable cause]?” according to court records.

Duran replied, “It should be. I hope I sent the right one?” but did not mention the confidential informant.

In his order, Schieferdecker made clear he did not think it was appropriate for officers to withhold information about confidential informants and noted the state has a process for protecting their identities.

Schieferdecker declined to comment through a spokesman and also declined an interview with the Becker County investigator.

The Hubbard County attorney could have appealed Schieferdecker’s judgment denying the search warrant. But he told the disciplinary investigator that they decided not to because he felt it would “open a big can of worms” by siding with Duran over the judge.

Frieden, in an interview with the Reformer, said without the search warrant it would be too difficult to prove that the drugs belonged to the two suspects.

“Just because something’s in a vehicle does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that anyone in that vehicle was aware of it. And even if they were aware of it, that they actually possessed it,” Frieden said.

Frieden said he wouldn’t have any problem putting Duran on the witness stand in future cases.

Minnesota Reformer is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Minnesota Reformer maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor J. Patrick Coolican for questions: info@minnesotareformer.com. Follow Minnesota Reformer on Facebook and X.

Trump debuts new material in attack on Harris in Minnesota

ST. CLOUD, Minn. — Former President Donald Trump had new material on Vice President Kamala Harris for thousands of cheering supporters in St. Cloud on Saturday evening at a rally with his running mate, Ohio U.S. Sen. J.D Vance.

Trump called Harris — the likely Democratic nominee for president since President Joe Biden ended his reelection campaign a week ago — a “radical left lunatic” who supports defunding the police, taking away guns, letting in tens of millions of undocumented immigrants, and limiting red meat. He also said she isn’t very smart.

Trump also took swings at his other favorite targets: Biden, “fake news,” radical Islamic terrorism and violent “illegal aliens” whom he compared to Dr. Hannibal Lecter from the horror movie “Silence of the Lambs.”

“I mentioned him because we have people like that coming into our country. They’re closing their insane asylum all over the world. They’re sending the criminals into the United States,” Trump said.

Trump added some optimism to his speech, promising an immediate turn of fate for America as soon as he’s back in the Oval Office: “Inflation will stop. The illegal aliens will be turned back. The cartels will be in retreat. Crime will fall. Energy prices will plummet. Incomes will soar. And a world in chaos will rapidly be transformed into a planet of peace.”

In fact, economists from an array of think tanks and Wall Street firms say Trump’s plan to halt immigration and raise tariffs on imported goods would cause inflation to increase and inflation-adjusted incomes to drop.

Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody’s Analytics and economic adviser to the presidential campaign of the late Sen. John McCain, told CBS MoneyWatch that consumers “will be hopping mad a year from now” about inflation if Trump wins and enacts his policies.

The line to see Trump at the Herb Brooks National Hockey Center serpentined nearly a mile through a residential neighborhood, with people sweating in the 90-degree heat through t-shirts reading “I’m voting for the felon” and “Mean tweets and cheap gas.”

Standing in line, Jake Wolf of St. Cloud said he believed Trump would get the country “under control” with border security and “getting transgender sh** out of childrens’ schools.”

Darla Schmidt of Montevideo befriended fellow truck driver Brian Nelson of Pine City in line. Both said their main concerns are the increased cost of living eating into their wages, and believes Trump will be able to rein in prices.

Asked about the prospect of higher tariffs driving up prices, Schmidt said it was like cleaning a house: “It gets nasty first, but eventually it’s going to work its way through.”

While some 8,000 supporters made it inside the arena, more than a 1,000 others were disappointed to be turned away and left to cheer for Trump’s image on a giant screen set up in the arena’s parking lot. The Reformer was outside the arena with them.

Trump said they will win Minnesota easily as long as “they don’t cheat.”

Ahead of the rally, Democrats including Gov. Tim Walz and U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar held their own event to energize 300 volunteers at the St. Paul Labor Center to kick off a Saturday door-knocking session.

“Three days ago, the nation found out what we’ve all known in Minnesota, [Trump and Vance] are just weird,” Walz said at the rally.

Walz is suddenly receiving lots of chatter as a potential running mate to Harris, in part for his blistering attacks on the Trump-Vance ticket: “They’ll be happy to only be 10 points behind by the time we’re done with them,” he said, according to a Harris campaign press release.

Despite its faint-purplish hue, Minnesota hasn’t gone red in a presidential election since voting for Richard Nixon in 1972.

Even when Trump knocked down much of the blue wall across the Upper Midwest in 2016, Minnesota remained stubbornly Democratic. Hillary Clinton won the state, albeit by just 1.5 percentage points, a closer margin than in any election since native son Walter Mondale squeaked out his only state win against Ronald Reagan in 1984.

Minnesota’s elusiveness has made the state a particularly precious prize for Trump, who spent millions here in 2020 even as he lost ground in the state, trailing Biden by 7 percentage points.

Trump vowed never to return to Minnesota if he lost the state in 2020, although he returned this year in May to speak at the Minnesota GOP’s annual Lincoln Reagan Dinner, where he repeated the flagrant lie that he won the state in 2020.

Even though Biden suffered floundering approval ratings in recent years, he maintained a 6 percentage point lead over Trump in Minnesota, according to a June KSTP/Survey USA poll.

Harris has widened the margin for Democrats since becoming their all-but-certain presidential nominee with a 10 percentage point lead over Trump — 50% to 40% — in a KSTP/Survey USA poll released on Saturday.

Ruby red St. Cloud was friendly territory for Trump, who won 60% of the vote in Stearns County in 2020.

Vance took the stage first, speaking for about 20 minutes, with a speech that previewed Trump’s message on immigration at the southern border, Islamic extremism and support for the police, even though his running mate is now a convicted felon and facing charges in three other cases.

Vance also repeated a new attack on Harris for a tweet she sent four years ago in support of Minnesota Freedom Fund, a nonprofit organization that pays cash bail for people facing criminal trials or immigration hearings. At the time, the organization was bailing out people arrested in the protests and riots following the police killing of George Floyd. Harris hasn’t been involved in the organization beyond that one tweet, according to the organization.

“When rioters and looters were burning American cities to the ground, including Minneapolis, Kamala Harris was raising money to bail them out of jail. Let’s throw them in jail and deport them out,” said Vance, who’s now on a ticket that promises to pardon many of the people convicted of rioting at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, when Trump sought to disrupt the peaceful of transfer of power after losing the election.

The Minnesota Freedom Fund has bailed out more than 2,500 people awaiting trial since its founding in 2016, arguing that the constitutional right to be innocent until proven guilty shouldn’t depend on a person’s income. Some of the people for whom the organization has posted bail have gone on to commit serious crimes, including rape and murder.

But the Trump campaign also attacked the organization for bailing out Jaleel Stallings, who was accused of attempting to kill police officers but later acquitted of all charges by a jury. One officer involved in the incident pleaded guilty to felony assault on Stallings, and apologized to him.

Trump also falsely said Saturday that he sent in the National Guard to quell the rioting in Minneapolis after Floyd’s murder; in fact, Walz, a 24-year veteran of the National Guard before his time in politics, called up the Guard.

Trump was joined on stage by Shannon Owen, whose husband Josh Owen was killed in the line of duty as a Pope County Sheriff’s Deputy, and Paul Perez, president of the National Border Patrol Council.

The rally drew many East African immigrants, despite Trump’s anti-immigrant message. He promised in his speech to reinstate the travel ban on predominantly Muslim countries, including Somalia.

Osman Dagane, an Uber and Lyft driver from Minneapolis, said he arrived early Saturday morning to organize East African immigrants to come support Trump. He brushed off Trump’s previous comments on immigration — including that Somali migration to Minnesota has been a “disaster.”

“Well, now he gets to know a lot,” Dagane said. “He didn’t know that time, but now he know a lot.”

Dagane left before Trump took the stage because he was mainly interested in seeing Vance. Many people started filtering out of the arena thirty minutes into Trump’s speech, leaving only the most devoted behind.

Minnesota Reformer is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Minnesota Reformer maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor J. Patrick Coolican for questions: info@minnesotareformer.com. Follow Minnesota Reformer on Facebook and X.

Ilhan Omar’s husband accused of swindling investor in their California winery

In fall 2021, D.C.-area restaurant owner Naeem Mohd was presented with an unbelievable investment opportunity.

Two political operatives-turned-venture capitalists would triple Mohd’s money in just 18 months if he invested $300,000 in their new California winery.

The pair had been paid in grapes by a former client and had hired a well-respected Sonoma winemaker to turn those grapes into profit. They promised if they didn’t pay Mohd the full $900,000 on time, they would tack on 10% monthly interest on any outstanding balance, according to the contract shared with the Reformer.

The offer might have seemed suspicious if not for the person making it: Tim Mynett, a well-connected political consultant and husband to U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar, whom he married in 2020.

Mynett came recommended by Mohd’s attorney, Faisal Gill, a former Democratic operative himself who knew Mynett from his days working on Keith Ellison’s congressional campaigns. Mynett and Gill had been friends since. Omar endorsed Gill in his unsuccessful bid for L.A. County Attorney, and Gill donated $1,000 to Omar’s campaign in 2021.

“I trusted Tim,” Gill said in an interview. “If it was not for Tim, the deal would have never happened.”

Mohd wired the $300,000 to Mynett and his long-time business partner Will Hailer, with whom he founded a political consultancy called E Street Group in 2018.

But 18 months came and went without Mohd receiving the 200% return he was promised from the winery, eStCru.

Mynett and Hailer only returned Mohd’s $300,000 — about a month late — according to a lawsuit Gill filed on behalf of Mohd in California last fall seeking at least $780,000.

The complaint, which has not been previously reported, claims the pair “fraudulently misrepresented … that estCru, LLC was a legitimate company.”

Hailer and Mynett deny they defrauded Mohd. Rather, they say they simply struggled to build a successful business in a challenging industry during the COVID-19 pandemic.

“ESTCRU LLC like many wineries is living invoice to invoice, sale to sale to stay afloat given the economic conditions of the industry,” Hailer wrote in response to a list of questions from the Reformer. Hailer declined requests for an interview on the phone.

The winery’s struggling finances represent a significant change in fortune for Mynett and Hailer since Omar announced she would no longer use their firm E Street Group on her campaigns after paying them around $3 million in the 2020 election.

Still, Hailer defended the potential for large returns in the wine business, writing, “If any investor put $X dollars in to allow the company to purchase grapes and we turned those grapes into bottles of wine that we sold you would see a 3 or 4x return.”

Within minutes of Hailer sending responses to the Reformer’s questions, lawyers for Mynett and Hailer followed up with a three-page letter saying they had been retained to “help ensure that defamatory falsehoods are not published about them.”

“Any suggestion that Will or Tim deliberately defrauded investors or otherwise consciously conspired to rip people off would be false and defamatory,” wrote attorneys Mark Thomson and Andy Phillips with the law firm Meier Watkins Phillips Pusch.

eStCru did produce a line of wines with names like Blockchain, Overt and The Devil’s Lie with their winemaker Erica Stancliff, who left a job at a prestigious vineyard to work with Hailer and Mynett.

Hailer sent the Reformer a brochure listing eStCru’s accolades and noted Wine Business Monthly called eStCru a hot brand of 2022.

Stancliff said things were going well from her point of view until early 2023, when she stopped getting paid.

“It happened very abruptly,” Stancliff said. “I couldn’t even tell you exactly how it happened other than we hit a wall and the reserve was no longer there.”

She said she continued working without pay for several months hoping things would turn around for her and her coworkers, but eventually she couldn’t afford to wait any longer and resigned.

Hailer said eStCru has never had any employees working without pay. When asked about Stancliff, he clarified that “As the economic conditions wreaked havoc on the industry we had a few former employees who wanted to stay with the company and weather the storm as contractors.”

Hailer acknowledged that Stancliff is owed money: “I do believe that as a contractor she may have invoices that may not be current.”

Mynett and Hailer say they are now working to sell the intellectual property and trademarks associated with the brand.

$1.2 million for weed ventures goes up in smoke

A short-lived winery isn’t the only source of financial trouble and litigation for companies connected to Hailer and Mynett.

In April 2023, soon after Stancliff said she stopped getting paid and Mohd was due a big payday that never came, three of Hailer and Mynett’s other companies agreed to pay $1.7 million to three South Dakota marijuana entrepreneurs to settle a lawsuit alleging fraud and breach of contract.

The companies — eSt Ventures, Badlands Fund GP and Badlands Ventures — only paid $500,000. That led to a confession of judgment last fall, not previously reported, which was signed by Hailer, with the companies admitting they still owe $1.2 million.

The marijuana entrepreneurs and their investors are now suing Hailer and the companies in Nebraska, where Hailer lives, for the remainder.

Mynett was mentioned in the lawsuit but not named as a defendant. He wrote in an email that he withdrew from eSt Ventures in early 2022, “because I wasn’t active in any of the work (securing investment, placing investment or even structure).” The company is now listed as “inactive” because it’s delinquent on its business filing fee in Nebraska.

Consistent with Mynett’s response, the companies don’t appear on Omar’s 2023 disclosure.

Although the business is typically called eSt Ventures, Omar lists an “EstVenture LLC” on her disclosures in previous years. She reported spousal income from EstVenture of $5,001-$15,000 in 2021 and $15,001-$50,000 in 2022.

In her latest congressional financial disclosure filed in May, Omar reported spousal income in 2023 of $201-$1,000 from eStCru and $15,0001-$50,000 from Rose Lake Capital, a venture capital management firm founded by Mynett and Hailer.

The modest sums stand in stark contrast to the income Omar reported when she was paying her husband’s political consulting firm millions for campaign work.

Omar reported spousal income from E Street Group ranging from $100,001 to $1 million in both 2020 and 2021.

In an email to the Reformer, Mynett said he and Will began to pivot from politics to business in order to test advertising strategies that could then inform political strategies. He said they were “incredibly successful” at digital advertising and targeting — skills that could be transferred to business success.

Mynett said he was also confronted with a barrage of harassment and intimidation by “MAGA extremists” since marrying Omar and felt it was in his best interest to get out of politics.

In the beginning, Mynett said he and Hailer agreed to a 50-50 split between eSt Ventures and other business prospects.

Hailer and Mynett were also co-managers of a company called Born to Run GP LLC, which purported to control a $50 million investment fund, according to a management services contract between eSt Ventures LLC and Born to Run obtained by the Reformer. Born to Run does not appear on Omar’s financial disclosures.

Hailer said the fund did not end up having $50 million but does have active investments. Mynett said he withdrew from Born to Run at the same time he left eSt Ventures in early 2022 and never received any compensation from the company.

Omar’s office has not yet responded to a list of questions the Reformer sent last week. A spokesperson for the congresswoman said they would respond on Monday and then said the answers would come on Tuesday morning.

From OFAC to missing zeroes

Around the time Mynett said he left eSt Ventures is when the cannabis entrepreneurs say they were lured into business with Hailer with similarly fantastical promises made to the winery investor.

605 Cannabis Founder Ned Horsted said Hailer approached him with an offer to raise millions for his cannabis venture. Horsted and another cannabis business — led by Josh Wood and Bekki Engquist-Schroeder — had already raised $3.54 million from friends, acquaintances and even grandparents to capitalize on the state’s new medicinal marijuana program.

If the three turned over their $3.54 million, Hailer told them, eSt Ventures could more than triple their capital within days or weeks to fund two grow operations and a testing facility. Hailer said eSt Ventures had secured $6 million from outside South Dakota and another $1.5 million was expected from within the state, according to the lawsuit settled in Minnesota.

Horsted, who also had a brief career as a political operative, had met Hailer at the Minnesota DFL headquarters in 2010, and was impressed with Hailer’s connections and convinced by his pitch.

“He tells a great story,” Horsted said of Hailer in an interview. “It made sense in my mind. If you’re well connected, you could pick up the phone and get someone to give $100,000 to a campaign, you could probably get that same kind of money for a business venture.”

The three cannabis entrepreneurs turned over everything they had to a new affiliate of eSt Ventures called Badlands Ventures LLC.

All through the summer of 2022, Hailer told the entrepreneurs and their investors that the millions in investments were just weeks away from being secured for their two marijuana companies, Dakota Natural Growers and 605 Cannabis. As the excuses began piling up, Horsted said he tried to reach out to Mynett via direct messages on LinkedIn and Twitter, but got no reply.

Horsted and his business partners said in their lawsuit they don’t believe that Badlands Ventures brought in any other money to capitalize the companies.

In August 2022, according to court documents, Badlands returned $1.86 million of the entrepreneurs $3.54 million “in exchange for promissory notes convertible into equity units in their cannabis businesses.” In other words, Hailer used the entrepreneurs’ own money to buy a stake in their businesses.

Later that month, Hailer promised to wire hundreds of thousands of dollars to Dakota and 605 but couldn’t at the moment because the Office of Foreign Assets Control had placed a hold on the funds.

That explanation confused the owners of Dakota and 605. The Office of Foreign Assets Control is a federal agency under the U.S. Treasury Department that enforces economic and trade sanctions. It investigates and penalizes companies for illegally dealing with foreign adversaries like Russia, Iran and North Korea.

Hailer, citing the settlement agreement, declined to comment on the Treasury Department hold on their money.

Through September, Hailer assured them the money was just days away. He told them on Sept. 6 that he was “waiting on a call back from the bank that we can move the money today.” On Sept. 26, Hailer said, “I just landed a call into the bank. I personally hit send on wires Friday afternoon.” The money didn’t arrive.

In October, Hailer said he had to go to the hospital but continued his assurances that the money would be transferred right away, according to the lawsuit. He said he tried to wire $1 million to each company but it ran up against the bank’s limit so he would wire them the money in chunks.

“Rest assured — $500k min will be to you tomorrow and the other $500k if not tomorrow [then] the next day,” Hailer said, according to the lawsuit.

Each company received just $50,000, which Hailer attributed to the bank forgetting a zero. But they never received another transfer.

In November 2022, through an attorney, Dakota and 605’s founders and investors requested to see Badlands Ventures’ bank accounts. They were entitled to see the company’s books as a part of their contract, but Hailer’s attorney refused, according to the lawsuit.

Horsted, his business partner and their investors filed that lawsuit in Minnesota the following month seeking the rest of their $3.5 million. Now they are hoping to win back their $1.2 million through the lawsuit they filed in Nebraska, while they continue to grow the medical marijuana businesses on a shoestring.

“We’re surviving but it’s been very difficult.” Horsted said.

‘The prowess to execute the right opportunities’

But discovery documents in that case show Hailer’s businesses have little in their bank accounts. According to answers Hailer provided in court documents in February this year, eSt Ventures had 5 cents in its bank account.

Rose Lake Capital had $42.44 and Rose Lake Inc. had $10. ESTCRU had $650. Hailer’s personal checking account had $3.05.

“Running a business is hard and I’ve learned that the hard way,” Hailer wrote in an email to the Reformer. “In all my business struggles, though, I’ve always tried to put my employees, contractors, and investors first.”

Hailer said he could have taken the easy route, by declaring bankruptcy, but has stuck it out for the best outcomes for his investors and workers.

While Mynett says he withdrew from eSt Ventures in early 2022, he and Hailer didn’t stop doing business together. The pair incorporated Rose Lake Capital, the international venture capital firm, in Delaware later that year.

Hailer said Rose Lake Capital is now a “dormant entity” because they transitioned the company from an LLC to a public benefit corporation called Rose Lake Inc., which focuses on socially responsible investing.

The company’s website touts “exclusive partnerships for global operators” and “on-the-ground experience in more than 75 countries.”

The website lists Hailer and Mynett as co-founders with Democratic political consultant Alex Hoffman and an impressive lineup of advisors, including a former U.S. ambassador to Bahrain, a former CEO of Amalgamated Bank, and former U.S. Rep. Collin Peterson.

“From distressed assets to buying publicly traded companies – our team has the prowess to execute the right opportunities,” its website says.

Minnesota Reformer is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Minnesota Reformer maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor J. Patrick Coolican for questions: info@minnesotareformer.com. Follow Minnesota Reformer on Facebook and Twitter.

Trader Joe’s argues National Labor Relations Board is unconstitutional

Take a seat in the Break Room, our weekly round-up of labor news from Minnesota and beyond. This week: Trader Joe’s launches raid on New Deal; Minnesota lawmakers receive public option estimates; Minneapolis and Rochester teachers protest on ‘Walkout Wednesdays’; Twin Cities janitors to take strike vote; Forces align to kill U.S. Steel deal; and the prison labor that feeds America.

Nautical-themed grocery chain launches raid on the New Deal

In defending itself against union busting allegations, Trader Joe’s fired a cannon ball that could sink the ship of modern American labor law.

The grocery store chain is arguing that the federal agency prosecuting it for unfair labor practices — including giving union workers worse retirement benefits and barring workers from wearing union pins on their company-issued Hawaiian shirts — is unconstitutional.

The argument, first reported by Bloomberg, is unlikely to be ruled on before an appeal but could pose an existential threat to the National Labor Relations Board, a nearly 90-year-old institution created as part of the New Deal to protect workers’ right to unionize and act collectively to improve their working conditions.

The board was born from the National Labor Relations Act of 1935, which faced stiff resistance from businesses but was ultimately affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision in 1937. But businesses may now find a more sympathetic audience with the current conservative supermajority of the high court, which has shown itself willing to overturn decades of precedent.

Trader Joe’s argument follows a similar attack by Elon Musk’s SpaceX — which is represented by the same law firm, Morgan Lewis — in a lawsuit filed in federal court in Texas challenging the constitutionality of the NLRB, which is prosecuting the company for illegally firing eight employees for criticizing Musk in an open letter in 2022.

“This isn’t just an attack to bust Trader Joe’s United, I think this is an attempt by right-wing billionaires and Morgan Lewis and Trader Joe’s and Elon Musk to destroy the American labor movement,” Seth Goldstein, an attorney for the union Trader Joe’s United, said in an interview with the Reformer. “American labor should wake up.”

Trader Joe’s did not respond to messages seeking comment.

Trader Joe’s attorneys, including one who previously worked for the NLRB, introduced the argument that the labor board is unconstitutional at a Jan. 16 hearing in Connecticut before an administrative law judge in a case dealing with a slew of complaints brought by the agency.

The NLRB alleges Trader Joe’s illegally fired a union worker, posted false information about the union, unlawfully interrogated union workers, threatened to freeze workers’ wages if they unionized, gave union workers worse retirement benefits and forced workers to attend unlawful “captive audience” meetings to hear the company’s position against unionizing.

Most of the complaints stem from conduct at a Trader Joe’s in Hadley, Mass., but workers at the downtown Minneapolis location are also witnesses in the trial for having their retirement benefits cut.

Depending on the outcome of the trial, the case could be appealed to the five-member board and then to a U.S. Court of Appeals and ultimately the Supreme Court.

The NLRB judge overseeing the case, Charles Muhl, said he is “certainly not going to be ruling on my own constitutionality anytime soon.”

Trader Joe’s workers in Minneapolis were the second to unionize, voting 55-5 to join Trader Joe’s United in 2022. At the time, Trader Joe’s said it was “prepared to immediately begin” negotiations, but none of the four unionized stores have won a first bargaining agreement covering wages, benefits, and working conditions.

Lawmakers weigh many public option options

The Minnesota Commerce Department delivered a key report to state lawmakers on Thursday estimating how many people would sign up for publicly subsidized health insurance. And, what it would cost the state if there were a public option for workers — like farmers and small business owners — who don’t have affordable employer-sponsored plans.

Many workers are locked into jobs because they need the employer-based health insurance. A robust public option, Democrats say, would give those workers the freedom switch jobs or start a business by lowering costs for individual plans.

The actuary’s estimates vary widely, projecting anywhere from 107,000 to 151,000 Minnesotans enrolling at a cost somewhere between $86 million and $364 million annually depending on how the program is set up. The estimate doesn’t include state administrative costs, which could be significant, and there are numerous other unknowns: how the state would pay for the subsidies; if there would be an income cap for discounts; and how much doctors would be paid for services.

Democrats said they’re committed to filling in the blanks and developing a public option, which could become available in 2027 at the earliest.

“Today’s report puts us on a path to a credible public option and we have our sleeves rolled up to do this important work,” House Majority Leader Jamie Long, DFL-Minneapolis, said in a statement on Thursday.

Any program proposal is likely to face resistance: Republicans over uncertain costs to taxpayers; health care providers over likely cuts to their reimbursement rates; and health insurers over constraints on costs and the potential threat to their business.

There have been challenges in the two other states with public option-style insurance: Insurers in Colorado have largely failed to meet the state’s price targets, while in Washington, public option plans haven’t been available in all counties. But on the whole, advocates point out the programs have saved consumers money and improved their benefits.

Minnesota Commerce Department Commissioner Grace Arnold said Minnesota will be able to learn from other states and her agency has identified questions for the Legislature to answer as it weighs how to structure the program.

“We’re glad to have a lot more information,” Arnold said. “We haven’t had this much information to dig through.”

Minneapolis teachers begin ‘Walkout Wednesdays’

Greta Callahan, president of the teacher chapter of the Minneapolis Federation of Teachers, speaks to reporters during the first “Walkout Wednesday” after school on Jan. 31, 2024. Photo by Max Nesterak/Minnesota Reformer.

Minneapolis public school teachers and support staff joined Rochester teachers in beginning a regular protest on Wednesdays to ramp up public pressure on school administrators amid stalled contract negotiations. Every Wednesday, the teachers’ union says their members will leave school right when classes end and won’t show up early on Thursdays.

About three quarters of school districts across Minnesota have settled contracts with their local teachers’ unions, but several dozen remain stuck in negotiations.

The Minneapolis teachers’ union is asking for an 8.5% raise in the first year of the contract and a 7.5% raise in the second, which together would make them among the highest paid in the state. In 2022, teachers in Minneapolis struck for 14 school days, ultimately winning about 5% raises over two years.

The latest demand is a difficult proposal for a district on the brink of insolvency, beleaguered by declining enrollment and a sprawling real estate portfolio. In response to the walkout, the district released a statement saying it needs to reduce spending by $90 million next year in order to remain solvent.

The union released its own report on Thursday aimed at countering the district’s dim financial outlook, accusing district leaders of overspending on administrative support services and budgeting “for declining enrollment as a foregone conclusion.”

The union’s position is that the district can refill its schools by investing in educators who will attract the roughly 40% of Minneapolis students who don’t go to public schools.

“It’s essential that to get families back, we are attracting and retaining the finest,” said Greta Callahan, president of the teacher chapter of the Minneapolis Federation of Teachers, outside Southwest High on Wednesday.

8,000 janitors and security officers to take strike vote

SEIU Local 26 announced its 8,000 members of Twin Cities janitors and security officers will vote on Saturday on whether to call an unfair labor practices strike if they don’t reach a deal with employers.

The union has been negotiating for months with a slew of companies that provide cleaning and security services to office buildings and retail stores across the metro, but the union says talks are stalled over higher wages, retirement benefits and “respect on the job.” The union said Attorney General Keith Ellison is expected to join workers at a rally on Saturday.

SEIU Local 26 planned for its contracts to expire around the same time along with other unions, which could lead to a strike affecting multiple industries.

Forces line up to disrupt U.S. Steel sale

The announcement that Japan’s Nippon Steel would buy the iconic industry titan U.S. Steel last December was a blow to both the United Steelworkers and American rival Cleveland-Cliffs, which had made an unsolicited offer to buy the company with the union’s support.

A deal of such magnitude and importance to American interests is never a sure bet: it must pass regulatory scrutiny and the political gales of an election year. The Biden administration has voiced skepticism of the deal, while former President Donald Trump said this week he would block it if reelected.

The president of Cleveland-Cliffs signaled during an earnings call that he was ready to help disrupt the deal, too, reports Iron Range Today’s Jerry Burnes. The company has brought on a new member of its board of directors, Ron Bloom, who helped the United Steelworkers leverage its labor agreement to block the sale of another steel company to a foreign buyer in 2007.

The prison labor that feeds America (and a couple local companies)

The Associated Press published a two-year investigation into prison labor in America, beginning with this arresting lead from Angola, Louisiana: “A hidden path to America’s dinner tables begins here, at an unlikely source – a former Southern slave plantation that is now the country’s largest maximum-security prison.”

Inmates at the Louisiana State Penitentiary and prisons across the country work for meager wages — sometimes as little as 2 cents an hour or nothing at all — raising cattle, planting turnips and harvesting grains.

Those products are then bought up by behemoth commodity traders like Minnesota-based Cargill and household names like General Mills to produce McDonald’s Happy Meals and boxes of Frosted Flakes. Some goods are exported, including to countries that the United States has sanctioned for using forced labor, according to the report.

Cargill acknowledged to Associated Press reporters Robin McDowell and Margie Mason that it purchased goods from prison farms in Tennessee, Arkansas and Ohio. The company said it was just a small fraction of its overall volume and that it was “now in the process of determining the appropriate remedial action.”

The conditions can vary greatly across prisons: Some former inmates said they learned valuable job skills while others described conditions reminiscent of the Antebellum South — picking cotton in scorching heat under the watchful eye of armed guards on horseback who would “beat you right there in the field.”

Minnesota Reformer is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Minnesota Reformer maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Patrick Coolican for questions: info@minnesotareformer.com. Follow Minnesota Reformer on Facebook and Twitter.

University of Minnesota regent asks if Morris campus is becoming ‘too diverse’

University of Minnesota Regent Steve Sviggum suggested that increased diversity may be contributing to declining enrollment at the system’s rural Morris campus during a recent meeting of the board of regents.

“Is it possible at Morris that we’ve become too diverse? Is it possible at all from a marketing standpoint?” Sviggum said.

Sviggum prefaced his comments by saying it’s important for the institution to promote diversity but said he received two comments from friends saying their kids wouldn’t attend U of M-Morris because it is “too diverse a campus.”

“They just didn’t feel comfortable there,” Sviggum said.

Sviggum, a former Republican speaker of the Minnesota House, raised the question as the board was discussing declining enrollment with the Morris campus’ acting chancellor Janet Schrunk Ericksen.

Like colleges and universities across the country, the University of Minnesota-Morris has been grappling with declining enrollments for the past decade. Of the University of Minnesota’s five campuses, enrollment has declined the greatest at Morris, which has seen a 45% drop in the number of students attending from 10 years ago. In the 2011 academic year, Morris had 1,932 students compared to 1,068 today.

In her presentation to the regents on Oct. 12, Ericksen said the college has struggled to attract students amid increased competition for high school students and a growing preference for urban campuses.

The greatest enrollment decline has been among white students. Nearly 70% of the student body was white a decade ago compared to 54% of the student body in the current academic year. The share of Native students has increased significantly from 13% a decade ago to 31% today.

The Morris campus has historically had a large Native American student population, a function of the college’s history. The college is on the site of a former Indian boarding school. When the land was transferred to the state of Minnesota it came with the stipulation that Native students have free tuition.

The college also offers extensive Native cultural and academic programming, including Ojibwe language instruction. It boasts being the only four-year college in the upper Midwest qualifying for federal designation as a Native American Serving Non-Tribal Institution.

While the share of Native American students at Morris has increased over the past decade, the percentage of other racial minorities has not changed significantly.

Sviggum said he knew he was “on thin ice” with the question but “at 72 years old, I say things that I wouldn’t never of even thought when I was 52.”

Ericksen replied that she recently met with members of the Black student association, who would disagree with that characterization. Less than 4% of the student body is Black.

“I think they would be shocked that anyone would think our campus was too diverse. They certainly, at times, feel very isolated where they are located,” Ericksen said. “So from that perspective, the answer is no.”

She went on to say multiple perspectives are “absolutely core” to liberal arts education, and noted that white students are the majority on the campus.

Sviggum said it was a good answer.

Sviggum later went on WCCO Radio to defend the comments, saying he was “just asking a question.”

Sviggum served in the state House for 28 years as a Republican representative from southeastern Minnesota. He left the House to be commissioner of the Department of Labor and Industry. He later became communications director for the Republican caucus in the state Senate. He has served on the Board of Regents since 2011.

Graphs by Christopher Ingraham.

Minnesota Reformer is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Minnesota Reformer maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Patrick Coolican for questions: info@minnesotareformer.com. Follow Minnesota Reformer on Facebook and Twitter.

NOW WATCH: 'Low income people are going to vote like our democracy depends on it': Protests center poor voters' demands ahead of midterms

'Low income people are going to vote like our democracy depends on it' Protests center poor voters'www.youtube.com

Before sowing doubt in U.S. elections, GOP candidate Kim Crockett went after a union election

Before Kim Crockett called the 2020 presidential election “rigged” in her bid for secretary of state, she spent two years trying to overturn another election’s results she didn’t like: The vote by thousands of personal care attendants to join the Service Employees International Union.

Crockett called the 2014 union election a “terrible fraud” that should be “tossed out,” and she made unsubstantiated claims that the union “hand-picked” voters, deceived workers into signing union cards and even forged them.

She helped lead an unsuccessful campaign to force the union to hold an election do-over and, when that failed, urged state lawmakers not to negotiate with SEIU over wages and benefits.

Crockett is a former bank attorney turned conservative activist who, if elected to secretary of state, will oversee Minnesota’s election administration.

At the time she was fighting the SEIU election, Crockett was a vice president at the conservative think tank Center of the American Experiment, where she directed the so-called Employee Freedom Project. It started in 2015 — a year after personal care attendants unionized — to “help free public employees from forced unionism.”

Crockett wrote prolifically about the union election, in blog posts and newspaper op-eds, arguing both that the election was fraudulent and that unions had no business representing personal care attendants because many of them care for their disabled or elderly relatives.

In one piece, she argued the union was “inserting itself into the private affairs of these families” and siphoning Medicaid dollars away from workers, despite the fact that no personal care attendant was ever required to pay dues if they didn’t want to.

In another piece, Crockett celebrated that SEIU was “on the ropes financially,” saying the union “preys on the vulnerable by taking their hard-earned union dues” and “undermines our political discourse by encouraging people to hate their country.”

Crockett did not respond to interview requests.

Historically, personal care attendants providing in-home care haven’t been allowed to unionize. The National Labor Relations Act of 1935, which protects the right of private sector employees to unionize, excludes domestic workers.

But in 2013, unions, workers and their Democratic allies in the state Legislature made a successful gambit to extend the option to tens of thousands of at-home personal care attendants.

Over Republican objections, Democratic-Farmer-Labor lawmakers passed a law that made certain in-home personal care attendants employees of the commissioner of Minnesota Management and Budget solely for the purpose of collective bargaining. Democrats applied the same rule to family child care providers that receive public subsidies.

The law didn’t change anything else about their jobs or how they were paid. PCAs continued receiving paychecks from various personal care agencies, which in turn billed the state’s version of the Medicaid program at rates set by the Legislature.

The only thing the new law did was open the door for unions to try to organize workers.

It was a high bar to clear. SEIU needed to collect signatures from 30% of roughly 27,000 eligible PCAs, a feat made more challenging than most union drives given the high turnover in the industry and the isolated nature of the work. Unlike most job sites, where union organizers can meet a bevy of workers in a given day, personal care attendants often work alone with their clients.

The union also faced two lawsuits in federal court by a group of personal care attendants who opposed unionization and sought to block the effort, though neither was ultimately successful.

After a little over a year, SEIU gathered more than enough union cards — 9,000 — to hold an election. Union ballots were sent out in what was the largest union election in state history. Although just a fraction of eligible workers voted — less than 6,000 — a majority voted in favor. Workers won the option to join SEIU with 3,542 voting to unionize.

From the beginning, workers in Minnesota were not required to pay union dues — about 3% of wages — because of a 2014 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court in a case challenging unionized personal care attendants in Illinois. The court ruled that home-care aides, as partial public employees, cannot be forced to pay union dues like other government workers.

Four years later, the Supreme Court would extend the same logic to all government workers in Janus v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, ruling that public employees cannot be forced to pay the cost of collective bargaining.

Once a union was formed in 2014, personal care attendants could choose to leave the union at any time. The union won’t say exactly how many PCAs are dues-paying members of SEIU, but the higher wages and benefits that SEIU has helped win at the Legislature have benefited all of the roughly 20,000 at-home personal care attendants covered by their contracts.

In 2015, then-Gov. Mark Dayton signed off on the first labor contract negotiated by SEIU and state officials, which raised the minimum wage for personal care attendants paid through Medicaid from $9 to $11 an hour, just under the average hourly wage for PCAs at the time. The contract also guaranteed workers paid time off for the first time and funding for new training and a grievance process.

Since then, the minimum wage for personal care attendants has increased to $15.25 an hour, and they earn time-and-a-half for working on holidays. The union also helped negotiate a higher wage for workers caring for clients with the greatest needs.

Crockett and the Center of the American Experiment entered the fray in 2016 — two years after the union election — when she helped start a campaign for a new election to get rid of the union.

Under the name MNPCA, Center of the American Experiment supported the efforts by a group of personal care attendants to sever ties between SEIU and all PCAs.

Crockett worked on the campaign with Doug Seaton, a conservative attorney who’s built a career fighting unions. Seaton, who did not respond to an interview request, had recently won a major victory in nullifying Dayton’s executive order for a union election by subsidized child care workers. (The Legislature later passed the law allowing them to seek unionization.)

He went on to found the Upper Midwest Law Center and was shortlisted by then-President Trump to serve on the National Labor Relations Board.

MNPCA elevated the stories of workers with various grievances against the union. Several workers complained that dues were deducted out of their paychecks without their consent. Part of the confusion was that SEIU automatically enrolled all of the 9,000 PCAs who originally signed union cards before the election, and some of them ended up voting against unionization. The union says it promptly refunded dues to anyone who said they didn’t want to be a member.

In July 2016, MNPCA launched a campaign to hold a decertification election. The threshold under state law to hold an election was the same as in 2014: 30% of eligible workers, or about 9,000 workers, had to sign cards saying they wanted an election to decertify the union.

From the start, MNPCA faced a major roadblock: Under state labor law, they only had a 60-day window in which to pursue a decertification election, and they couldn’t get an up-to-date list of all 27,000 in-home personal care attendants covered by the SEIU contract.

The state Bureau of Mediation Services — a state agency that oversees state labor law — only provided the 2014 list of personal care attendants used by the union to get the first election. The Department of Human Services, which maintained the most current list of personal care attendants, said their information wasn’t public under state law.

The group sued the state, and a Ramsey County judge sided with MNPCA and ordered that they get an updated list. The order would be overturned by the state Supreme Court four years later. But in 2016, with a new list in hand, MNPCA got to work knocking on doors.

When they failed to get enough signatures for an election, the list became fodder for fraud allegations by Crockett and Seaton. They said they weren’t able to reach many people on the list, claiming it included names of people who possibly didn’t exist, duplicate names, bad addresses and people who said they were never PCAs.

Phillip Cryan, executive vice president of SEIU Healthcare Minnesota, said the problems Crockett and Seaton described are familiar to anyone who has canvassed low-income workers — and not evidence of widespread fraud.

“Anytime you work with a list of thousands and thousands of people, but especially thousands of people living at the margin economically, there are going to be a lot of bad addresses and bad information,” Cryan said.

Low-income people tend to move frequently. They may be homeless or have other reasons for not putting their residential address on employment forms. Cryan said the union is still constantly cleaning up the information on its list of home care workers.

He said the list MNPCA got in 2016 was better than what the union received when it first started collecting signatures for an election. The union didn’t even get addresses or phone numbers, just a list of names and employers.

In December 2016, MNPCA filed a petition to hold an election to get rid of the union. MNPCA only submitted 2,400 signatures, but said it was enough by claiming that the bargaining unit was about 8,500 workers. Where they got that figure is unclear. Even on the group’s blog, they said they needed to collect 9,000 signatures.

The state Bureau of Mediation Services originally signed off on holding a new election, until SEIU challenged it because the group needed more than three times as many cards as they collected.

MNPCA continued to assert they had enough cards for an election until the BMS acting commissioner rejected their request for an appeal, writing that MNPCA, provided “no credible basis for its assertion that the unit is between 8,000 – 8,500 individual providers.”

During the next two years, MNPCA filed two more petitions seeking a decertification election and requesting an investigation into “fraud” in the 2014 election. They continued challenging that they needed 9,000 petition signatures, pointing to the union saying it represented about 20,000 workers.

MNPCA also pointed to this discrepancy — there were 27,000 workers when SEIU filed for an election, but the union claimed it represented just 20,000 workers — as evidence that providers were fleeing the home care programs subject to unionization. In reality, the reason was simply administrative. SEIU used a list based on one month of employment data rather than six months used by DHS, with high turnover explaining the difference.

MNPCA would eventually claim to have collected more than 10,500 signatures for a decertification effort, though the credibility of their petition has never been scrutinized. Anyone could sign a card on their website, which is still active years after the campaign ended.

The group never proved they collected enough signatures, and a decertification election was never held.

As their attempts at decertification floundered, Crockett and Seaton tried their case in the public square.

In 2017, Crockett wrote an op-ed in the Pioneer Press saying they wanted an investigation into the original election.

“The list used by the union had a huge percentage of non-existent names and addresses, or names that were not PCAs. Also, PCAs who never signed a union card are paying big union dues. Others have testified that SEIU organizers tried to pressure them into signing cards, or told them the cards were ‘just for information.’ This is fraud,” Crockett wrote.

Later that year, Seaton and Crockett got a hearing before a subcommittee on employee relations to explain their legal challenges to the union, even though the purpose of the subcommittee was simply to make recommendations on whether the Legislature should approve a labor contract, their second after the first in 2015.

Rep. Marion O’Neill, R-Maple Lake, who chaired the subcommittee, allowed testimony so they “could hear both sides.”

Seaton and Crockett’s goal was to stall for time. If the anti-union activists could get the Legislature to delay ratification of a new contract, they would have more time to submit a petition for a decertification election.

Their argument to lawmakers was that the union was invalid, and therefore the Legislature shouldn’t ratify a second contract, which promised to raise the minimum wage to more than $13 an hour.

When one lawmaker asked Seaton if he believed the union election — which happened three years prior — was settled law, Seaton replied: “We would say no it isn’t.”

At the hearing, one Duluth PCA named Sara Madill said the union forged her signature on a union card and took dues from her without her permission.

James Gulley, president of SEIU Healthcare Minnesota, said they investigated the handful of claims of forged signatures and determined the signatures were valid. He said they refunded their dues anyways, “because we have no interest in having any worker as a member who doesn’t want to be one.”

“The claims against our union have grown more silly and outlandish with time as their attempts to win support from actual home care workers has failed,” Gulley said.

Then-Rep. Debra Hilstrom, DFL-Brooklyn Center, said at the time that MNPCA was trying to take away the votes of the workers who did vote to unionize.

“What you’re asking us to do is say people who voted, who now have the option to be part of a union if they choose, they can opt out, shouldn’t have that right to cast their ballot and have their ballot,” Hilstrom said.

Crockett carried on the fight against the union for about another year, but it eventually petered out as the group couldn’t muster the signatures needed for a decertification petition.

In 2019, Crockett was suspended from the Center of the American Experiment, after making comments to a New York Times reporter that were widely denounced as racist. She then went to work for another right wing think tank, The Charlemagne Institute, before launching her bid for secretary of state, running on a platform of election security.

*A previous version of this story was incorrect about the DHS list of PCAs. They use a six-month list.


Minnesota Reformer is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Minnesota Reformer maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Patrick Coolican for questions: info@minnesotareformer.com. Follow Minnesota Reformer on Facebook and Twitter.

Judge dismisses lawsuit challenging Minnesota State Fair gun ban

A federal judge on Friday dismissed a lawsuit brought by gun rights activists challenging the Minnesota State Fair’s ban on guns, ruling the ban does not violate the activists’ Second Amendment rights.

The Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus and pair of gun rights activists — the Rev. Tim Christopher and Sarah Cade Hauptman — filed a lawsuit in 2021 against the State Agricultural Society, which runs the fair.

They argued the gun ban was illegal because of the Second Amendment and a state law that prohibits local jurisdictions from restricting firearms. The fairgrounds are on state property, and the Minnesota State Agricultural Society is a special state entity.

But their arguments did not convince U.S. District Court Judge John Tunheim, who wrote that the Agricultural Society has the right to ban guns given its responsibility to protect the safety of visitors.

Although Minnesota law allows permitted gun owners to carry in public — including at the State Capitol — gun restrictions are considered lawful in sensitive places like schools, other government buildings and the state fairgrounds, the judge noted.

“The Fairgrounds are a sensitive location with thousands of people and children present in often crowded conditions. As such, protecting the fairground from gunfire is a compelling interest,” Tunheim wrote.

Tunheim did not issue a decision on if the Agricultural Society’s ban violates the state law prohibiting local jurisdictions from restricting firearms. However, he said the activists did not have the right as private citizens to sue to enforce the law. The activists asked the judge to refer the question to the Minnesota Supreme Court, but he declined.

Tunheim’s ruling, coming less than two weeks before this year’s State Fair begins, is a victory for the Agricultural Society, which said allowing guns inside the fairgrounds would reduce ticket sales in the likelihood that music performers would pull out of the event.

Bryan Strawser, co-founder and chairman of the Gun Owners Caucus, said they are considering an appeal.

“We absolutely believe that people should not be illegally carrying firearms in violation of Minnesota law,” Strawser said. “At the same time, it’s unconscionable for a subdivision of government, like the State Fair, to prevent a law-abiding citizen from exercising their constitutional right to bear arms.”

Strawser said the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen, which knocked down New York’s strict restrictions on carrying guns in public, changes the calculus in their case.

The U.S. Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority ruled that Americans have a broad right to carry guns outside the home, although it can be restricted in certain places like government buildings and schools.

Strawser says the Supreme Court’s decision sets a higher bar for when governments can restrict people’s right to carry firearms, and that a place being densely populated is not reason enough to designate it a “sensitive location.”

Strawser and the other gun rights activists filed their lawsuit shortly after the fair installed metal detectors in 2020 to more closely screen fairgoers for weapons. This was prompted by shootings near the fairgrounds, including in 2019 when three people were shot just outside the main gates.

The increased violence is also what motivated the activists to sue to carry guns, saying they needed to be armed to protect themselves. Strawser pointed out that this year the State Fair police are struggling to recruit officers and have asked the Ramsey County Sheriff’s Office for help.

Both Christopher and Hauptman had previously carried guns inside the fairgrounds, their lawyer said during oral arguments, despite the State Fair long posting signs saying firearms are not permitted. Security guards have conducted bag searches since at least 2016.

After the fair installed metal detectors, Hauptman tried to enter the fairgrounds in 2021 with her firearm but was turned away.

At the time the activists filed their lawsuit, the Agricultural Society didn’t have an ordinance explicitly banning firearms.

While the Agricultural Society then created a rule banning guns, the activists said it was unenforceable and illegal since state law preempts local governments and state agencies from regulating firearms.

The activists first filed the lawsuit in state court but added a claim that it violated their federal civil rights, and so the case was moved to U.S. District Court.

Minnesota Reformer is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Minnesota Reformer maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Patrick Coolican for questions: info@minnesotareformer.com. Follow Minnesota Reformer on Facebook and Twitter.

Minnesota House Dems hope to fully legalized marijuana after sneaking THC edible provision past their GOP colleagues

House Democrats responsible for legalizing low-dose THC products said on Tuesday the under-the-radar approach that seemingly took Republicans by surprise was a necessary gambit to fully legalizing marijuana in the future.

“We absolutely did this on purpose. It was an intentional step forward,” said House Majority Leader Ryan Winkler, DFL-Golden Valley, who authored another bill that fully legalized marijuana but failed to gain traction in the Republican-controlled Senate.

The provision was tucked into a large health and human services bill and legalizes the production and sale of edible products with tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC. The food and beverages can only be sold to people over 21 and with no more than 5 milligrams of THC per serving — about half the dose allowed in other states with legal marijuana — or 50 milligrams per package.

It was signed into law by the governor in early June but went largely unnoticed by the public until the day before it went into effect on July 1.

“Sometimes legislation benefits from a lot of publicity. Sometimes legislation benefits from the ability to do the work more quietly, but it was all done in the public eye,” Winkler said when asked why Democrats didn’t publicize a bill they’re now all celebrating.

Republicans have responded both with surprise and subdued approval.

Sen. Jim Abeler, R-Anoka, said it has a “broader effect” than he expected. Senate Majority Leader Jeremy Miller, R-Winona, said in a statement he supported the “bipartisan legislation” that regulates the sale of products with THC.

The law has few restrictions on the sale — virtually any store can sell THC edibles — but does prohibit the edibles from looking like cartoon characters, animals or fruit so as not to make them attractive to kids. The products must also come in child-resistant packages.

But already there are problems with THC products looking too much like candy — they are sold as gummies and chocolates — according to the bill’s author, Rep. Heather Edelson, DFL-Edina.

“Later this week, I’ll be having more information about how we plan to handle that as a state,” Edelson said during the Tuesday news conference. “There’s going to be some problems in terms of how do we enforce this.”

Edelson said she and her fellow lawmakers are working with the League of Minnesota Cities, indicating they will ask local governments play an active role in regulating THC edibles. The state Legislature is not in session and the governor would have to call a special session to pass any updates to the law.

The Board of Pharmacy, which mostly oversees licensing pharmacists and pharmacies, is tasked with regulating the potency, packaging and age requirements of the new products. It’s a large task for an agency that has fewer than two dozen employees.

The Democrats’ answer to any problems with the current law is to vote more of them into office this November, promising to pass full legalization if they control the House, Senate and governorship.

“The right thing to do is to elect Democrats, send us back to St. Paul so that we can continue working on this important issue,” said Rep. Jess Hanson, DFL-Burnsville.

The House Democrats, joined by activists and a hemp farmer, held the news conference outside Indeed Brewing in northeast Minneapolis, which Winkler suggested could benefit from selling beverages with THC.

The guidance from the Board of Pharmacy, however, says restaurants and bars may not add THC to food or beverages for onsite or take away consumption. THC also may not be added to beer or other alcoholic beverages.

Democrats emphasized the foot-in-the-door legalization bill furthers racial justice, as Black and Indigenous people have been disproportionately arrested and incarcerated for marijuana crimes.

The law, however, doesn’t do anything to explicitly advance racial equity, such as giving licensing priority or grants to people from areas that were targeted in the War on Drugs — although those efforts have largely floundered elsewhere in the country. That means people with capital and relationships to financial lenders and existing THC businesses will likely dominate the Minnesota legal marijuana market.

Angela Dawson, a Black hemp farmer from Pine County, said the law isn’t perfect, but it will create more opportunities for people of color.

“We’re working with the scraps we’re given, quite frankly,” Dawson said. “We’re going to continue to push (an) equity agenda. We’re going to ask Minnesota to also be advocates for equity within this system.”


Minnesota Reformer is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Minnesota Reformer maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Patrick Coolican for questions: info@minnesotareformer.com. Follow Minnesota Reformer on Facebook and Twitter.

No charges filed against police officer who shot and killed Amir Locke in botched no-knock raid

The Minnesota attorney general and Hennepin County attorney will not charge the Minneapolis police officer who shot and killed 22-year-old Amir Locke during a botched no-knock raid in February.

“Amir Locke’s life mattered … Amir Locke is a victim,” reads a joint statement released on Wednesday. “However, there is insufficient admissible evidence to file criminal charges in this case.”

Locke’s killing in the early hours of Feb. 2 set off several days of protests and efforts at both the city and state level to ban no-knock search warrants.

Locke was not a suspect in a crime or named in the search warrants. He was lying on a couch under a blanket when a Minneapolis SWAT team raided the apartment he was staying in. In less than 10 seconds, officers approached Locke yelling “Police! Search warrant!”

Then an officer’s police light illuminated Locke’s face and showed a gun in his hand before an officer shot him three times and Locke crumpled, according to body camera footage released in the days after the killing.

The chaotic and confusing scene that ended tragically in mere seconds led to calls for the officer who killed him, Mark Hanneman, to be criminally charged.

But Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison and Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman said in the statement that Hanneman did not violate the state’s use-of-deadly-force law.

Police officers are allowed to kill if they reasonably believe it necessary to protect themselves or other officers from great bodily harm without consideration for the victim’s intent.

“The officers encountered an individual unknown to them … who was moving around under a blanket and held out a firearm that was pointed in the direction of at least one officer. This constitutes a specifically articulable threat,” the statement reads.

The prosecutors note that the SWAT team was executing a warrant on behalf of St. Paul police in a homicide investigation. High-powered rounds had been used in the killing, and the suspects “were known to possess firearms and engage in violent conduct.”

“These circumstances are such that an objectively reasonable officer in Officer Hanneman’s position would have perceived an immediate threat of death or great bodily harm that was reasonably likely to occur, and an objectively reasonable officer would not delay in using deadly force,” the statement reads.

Locke’s family expressed disappointment in the decision but vowed to pursue justice in the civil court system, although they have not yet filed a lawsuit against the city of Minneapolis and Hanneman.

“Today only deepens the resolve of Amir’s family and its legal team,” reads a statement released by the law firm of Ben Crump, who also represented the families of George Floyd, Daunte Wright and Breonna Taylor.

Ellison and Freeman, in announcing their decision, urged lawmakers to “seriously weigh the benefits of no-knock warrants, which are dangerous for both law enforcement and the public alike.”

Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, whose re-election campaign claimed he had already banned no-knock warrants, announced on Tuesday that the city had enacted a ban on requesting and executing no-knock search warrants.

Minnesota House Democrats have also moved forward with a ban on no-knock warrants.


Minnesota Reformer is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Minnesota Reformer maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Patrick Coolican for questions: info@minnesotareformer.com. Follow Minnesota Reformer on Facebook and Twitter.