Top Stories Daily Listen Now
RawStory
RawStory

Rubio reveals what he knew about friend accused of secretly lobbying for Venezuela

Secretary of State Marco Rubio testified Tuesday in a federal criminal case involving his once-roommate and friend, former Rep. David Rivera, saying during cross-examination that he did not know about Rivera's alleged crimes, CBS News reported.

Rivera has been accused of secretly lobbying for the Venezuelan government.

Rubio and Rivera had a close relationship in the past. Both are Cuban American immigrants from Miami, and Rivera was with Rubio when he picked out his wife's engagement ring. Rivera stood by Rubio's side as he pushed his political career forward while they both pursued their political ambitions in the Florida House of Representatives.

"Rubio described a 2017 meeting with Rivera where he said 'insiders in the regime in Venezuela' had convinced former Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro to step aside, and Rubio said he had no knowledge that Rivera had allegedly been contracted out by a subsidiary of a Venezuelan state oil company to arrange the meeting," according to CBS News.

Rubio described his response to the claims that Maduro was planning to step down.

"I was skeptical that it was true," Rubio said. "Because we've had so many other people" attempt to do the same thing with "double dealers who were constantly making these claims."

Federal prosecutors allege that Rivera and his codefendant Esther Nuhfer sought to influence the first Trump administration to lower political tensions and tone down sanctions on behalf of Maduro and then-Foreign Minister and now interim Venezuelan president Delcy Rodriguez. Rivera and Nuhfer were indicted in 2022 by a grand jury in the Southern District of Florida for failing to register as a foreign agent and money laundering.

"Prosecutors allege that the pair were hired in a $50 million contract in exchange for three months of lobbying work in 2017 on behalf of a U.S.-based subsidiary of a Venezuela state oil company, PDVSA, which operates under the name CITGO," CBS News reported.

The indictment revealed that both Rivera and Nuhfer were accused of trying to lobby Rubio, who was at the time a Miami Republican senator, and Kellyanne Conway, former White House advisor, on behalf of the Venezuelan government's high ranking leaders.

"The attempts to meet Conway were unsuccessful, prosecutors said, but added that the pair did arrange two meetings with Rubio, who is a longtime friend of Rivera's and had been an outspoken critic of the Maduro regime," according to CBS News.

This was the first time in more than 40 years that a current Cabinet member was called as a witness in a federal trial, according to The Washington Post.

Rubio was asked what he knew about the alleged $50 million contract between Rivera, Nuhfera and a Venezuela oil subsidiary.

"I have no such knowledge other than what is in the press and what is in the indictment," Rubio said.

JD Vance drops ominous message for Americans: ‘Suffering is going to get a lot worse’

Vice President JD Vance had a grim comment on Tuesday amid the looming five-week government shutdown as time was running out on funding SNAP benefits.

A reporter asked Vance about the mounting concerns that an estimated 42 million Americans could lose their benefits and go hungry, while the federal government has invested billions in the military and law enforcement.

"If you go back to previous government shutdowns, what has happened is that sometimes the president has tried to make the shutdown as painful as possible on the American people," Vance said. "I give the president of the United States great credit, and the entire team, for trying to make this as painless as possible."

Vance praised President Donald Trump and the administration, while claiming Democrats were solely to blame for the stalemate impacting American voters.

"The unfortunate reality, and we're starting to see this with our aviation industry, we're going to find out the hard way with SNAP benefits," Vance said. "The American people are already suffering, and the suffering is going to get a lot worse. Not because the president of the United States has failed to make the shutdown painless, he's tried to do everything that he can to make it as un-painless as possible. The reason that pain is coming and the reason it's building is because we're not passing a clean bill to reopen the government."

Senate Republicans were planning to propose a solution with Democrats over funding the Department of Homeland Security and end the partial shutdown, according to reports on Tuesday. It's unclear if Senate Democrats would agree to the proposal.

Democrats have demanded that immigration raids require judicial warrants, and Sen. John Hoeven (R-SD) told The New York Times that the suggested compromise would not include this concession.

Supreme Court sends major signal in Trump's war on immigration

The Supreme Court appeared willing to consider the Trump administration's request to block asylum seekers at the U.S.-Mexico border, according to reports on Tuesday.

The Supreme Court decision could give President Donald Trump and his administration the right to bring back a 2016 policy when the federal government turned away immigrants claiming asylum and seeking protection from persecution in the United States, The New York Times reported. The high court must determine "what exactly it means to 'arrive' in this country."

The current federal law allows any noncitizen who "arrives in the United States" to apply for asylum as long as they are "physically present in the United States."

The main focus of the case is whether noncitizens need to cross the border to gain the right to apply for asylum or if they can appear at the southern border and seek entry. Under the current law, migrants can announce they are seeking asylum and can get a referral for an interview to verify if the claimed fear of persecution is credible.

The case was expected to be decided in late June or early July, according to The Times. The justices reportedly spent more than an hour on Tuesday discussing the case and were "struggling to parse the difference between a person who 'arrives in' the United States and one who is 'arriving at' the border."

MAGA loses it as GOP gov appoints senator who donated to Trump foe: 'This should end him!'

MAGA fans were outraged after the controversial replacement for Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-OK) was announced on Tuesday.

Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt appointed oil and gas executive Alan Armstrong, who had formerly made a $5,800 donation to one of President Donald Trump's enemies, former Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL). Kinzinger had voted to impeach Trump, and the donation came around that time.

Stitt announced the appointment in a post on X, just hours after Mullin was formally confirmed late Monday as the new Homeland Security Secretary, replacing the outgoing embattled Trump administration leader Kristi Noem. Noem was fired by President Donald Trump, who appointed Mullin and moved Noem into another role.

"Alan is a proud third-generation Oklahoman, staunch conservative, respected business leader, and a devoted family man with an inspiring American Dream story," Stitt said.

"He is entering the U.S. Senate at a critical time for advancing reforms to secure America’s energy future. I have no doubt that his perspective will be influential in moving the needle on permitting reform to unlock American competitiveness and energy affordability for generations to come," Stitt added.

MAGA followers on social media were furious with the move, with several people calling Stitt a "RINO," a biting acronym for Republican in name only.

"Another RINO. lock and step. These people hate MAGA," Justin Baugher, who frequently shares MAGA-related content on his social media, wrote on X.

"Armstrong DONATED to Adam Kinzinger AFTER he voted to impeach President Trump and joined the J6 witch hunt committee. You couldn’t be more anti-Trump if you tried," Jessica, a paralegal and nutritionist who self-describes as MAGA and MAHA, wrote on X.

"Good this Should END @GovStitt any political ambitions he ever had!!! We are SICK of RINOS!!!" User janconcern, who self-identifies as MAGA, wrote on X.

"Wow. Just like he made us proud when he supported Biden. True RINO’s stick together," Sherre Ann, who self-describes as an "America First Patriot," wrote on X.

Trump Cabinet members are handing millions in cash gifts to the president: report

President Donald Trump has received millions in donations from his Cabinet members — except for three people, according to a new report Tuesday.

The Swamp, The Daily Beast's Substack, reported that out of Trump's 23 Cabinet members, 20 have offered substantial financial gifts to the president.

"Donald Trump has another good reason to keep praising his Cabinet members as they continue their relentless sucking up through his second term — they are putting their money where their mouths are by lining the president's pockets," according to The Swamp.

One Trump ally — the secretary of education and longtime business mogul — has donated the most.

"An astonishing 20 out of 23 of his Cabinet members have donated big checks to Trump's campaign, The Swamp has discovered. Former WWE wrestling boss Linda McMahon is the biggest donor with $20 million, and Trump’s New York pal Howard Lutnick has given $10 million," the outlet reported. "Perhaps the Cabinet runs on a sliding scale—the less they give, the more they need to grovel."

Citizens for Ethics, a nonpartisan nonprofit government watchdog organization, cited that Trump has received at least $30 million total in donations since 2023, which include political contributions, stock holdings and property visits.

Among the Cabinet members who have donated, these Trump administration officials have either made direct donations or financial gifts via committees they oversee. The known donors, according to Citizens for Ethics, include the following: Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, outgoing Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, Education Secretary Linda McMahon, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer, Energy Secretary Chris Wright, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, US Trade Rep. Jamieson Greer, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin, Small Business Administration Administrator Kelly Loeffler and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Attorney General Pam Bondi and Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. were among Trump Cabinet members who were not listed as donors. It's unclear if they have made donations to Trump's political or personal coffers.

Republicans clash as Trump ally bucks leadership by laying into 'pipe dream' DHS plan

Republican lawmakers were facing off on Tuesday over a path to end the partial government shutdown as a staunch ally of President Donald Trump bashed a GOP proposal his colleagues have hinted could be a solution.

Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) called the potential agreement to end the five-week stalemate by funding emergency removal operations with a budget reconciliation package and reopening the Department of Homeland Security a "pipe dream," The Hill reported.

Scott argued that this proposal "doesn't make any sense."

It was presented by Sen. Katie Britt (R-AL) to Trump on Monday night during a discussion with the president and GOP lawmakers, and would aim to break up the funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement and prompt Democrats to agree on a deal that would fund DHS.

Scott's reaction has highlighted some of the infighting underway within the Republican Party.

The Senate GOP has started to show fractures as "some Republicans worry trying to pin the blame on Democrats won’t produce a deal and could politically boomerang back on their own party," according to The Hill.

"While Republicans feel the shutdown was forced by Democrats, they also know their party owns the White House and both majorities in Congress and could suffer the blame — particularly amid the war with Iran that is already stoking political controversy," The Hill reported.

Trump's allies admit they're resorting to desperate 'gimmicks' to keep gas down: report

The Trump administration was reportedly looking for ways to drop gas prices at the pump, according to a Bloomberg report on Monday.

President Donald Trump has touted lowering oil prices throughout his campaign and first year of his second term, but as the Iran war hits its fourth week and oil prices skyrocket, his allies are aiming to make new moves ahead of the midterms this fall, Bloomberg's Nancy Cook reported.

"I’m told Cabinet members like Energy Secretary Christopher Wright, staff at the National Economic Council and the National Energy Dominance Council as well as other White House aides are soliciting ideas from policy experts, donors and energy executives as they struggle to limit the economic damage inflicted by the war," Cook wrote.

"Today, Trump himself backed down from threats he made over the weekend to begin hitting Iran’s energy infrastructure in 48 hours after allies and Gulf countries warned the president about the consequences and oil prices spiked," Cook explained.

Trump allies were apparently tasked with sharing potential remedies.

"Among the myriad ideas floated to the administration for consideration are asking Congress to suspend the federal gas tax; releasing more oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve once the current release is finished and fast-tracking drilling permits, according to people familiar with the internal discussions," Cook reported. "A White House official said while there are many options on the table, the administration at this time isn’t pursuing a gas tax holiday or an additional SPR release."

"One Trump ally acknowledged a lot of this was 'gimmicky' but said the White House has to show it’s taking action before the midterms, which inevitably will turn on the economy," Cook added. "With Republican control of Congress at risk, Trump has put his political team in a bit of a quagmire with ostensibly no clear strategy or timeline for ending the war."

Author reveals 'oh-my-God moment' from first Epstein meeting

Michael Wolff, a journalist who has written four books about President Donald Trump, shared the surprising information late financier and convicted child sex offender revealed on his private jet the first time they met.

In a post on his Substack, Wolff detailed his first meeting with Epstein in 2000, when they were traveling from New York City to the TED conference in Monterey, California, on Epstein's Boeing 727 with a number of other conference attendees and “three model-tall young women.”

The flight happened years before Epstein was under investigation for sex trafficking and abuse of young women, The Daily Beast reported.

Wolff described the peculiar experience.

"The dodginess could not be missed," he wrote.

Epstein then apparently started describing an island he was planning to develop in the Caribbean to architect David Rockwell. He asked Rockwell to review his blueprints.

"He clearly became more confounded as he looked more closely, and as Epstein chattily describing the extent of his other-worldly seeming project. 'What are these little rooms here?' a puzzled Rockwell finally asked, pointing to an area that might seem to resemble a medieval cloister,” Wolff wrote.

“That’s where the girls stay," Epstein apparently told the architect nonchalantly.

Little St. James is a private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands that was owned by Epstein and served as a location where he allegedly engaged in sex trafficking and abuse of minors. The island has become a focal point of investigations and public scrutiny following Epstein's arrest and conviction, with authorities examining records and evidence related to criminal activity that allegedly occurred there.

Wolff said that after the conference, he headed back with Epstein and the three young women to New York City. After he boarded the flight, Epstein asked him a question.

“‘Do you want to ride back here in the petting zoo?’ I thought I heard him say, without immediate comprehension, and, very slowly, second-guessing if I could have possibly heard him correctly—and, if I had (long before the interpretation of this might have been obvious), what could this possibly mean. ‘Or up in the cockpit with the pilots?'" Wolff wrote.

The author said he chose to ride in the cockpit instead.

Trump official ducks blame after another deadly airline disaster under his watch

Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy tried to deflect responsibility on Monday after two pilots were killed and dozens more people were injured in a collision at LaGuardia Airport — calling on Congress to increase their funding for air traffic control workers at airports.

Duffy was speaking at a news conference with several New York state and New York City leaders discussing the new details revealed around the moments that led to the fatal collision, which was still under a National Transportation Safety Board investigation. He dodged multiple questions about what happened and attempted to shift the blame.

"Congress needs to do their job," said Duffy, who cited multiple requests to lawmakers to fund air traffic controllers.

"I've been asking the Congress for additional money," Duffy said. "Many of you have reported that we need more money for air traffic control. We are modernizing our system, but we can't fully modernize it until the Congress gives us additional money. It's not a partisan issue. Both Democrats and Republicans agree, but they have to have the will to finish the funding. I'm not saying that this crash would have been prevented if we had all the equipment deployed, but it's important if we care about air travel safety, we care about having a brand new air traffic control system the best in the world with the best equipment, virtually all of it developed here in America."

Duffy described the staffing conditions at LaGuardia Airport.

"This airport has a target of 37 controllers at LaGuardia," Duffy said. "We have 33 controllers employed and certified at LaGuardia and we have six — seven actually in training, so as our airports go, LaGuardia is a very well-staffed airport. We are a couple controllers short in total, but it is a well-staffed airport."

He added that the air traffic controller was apparently not the only person on the job at the time, although the NTSB investigation is expected to provide more information.

"I did want to clarify, I've heard the rumor that there was only one controller in the tower, and that is not accurate," Duffy said.

This was the second fatal crash under Duffy's leadership and in President Donald Trump's second administration. Duffy has been accused of putting safety at risk by not addressing the low staffing among air traffic controllers in the United States as calls have grown for his resignation.

Trump official faces mounting calls to resign after yet another airline disaster

Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy was facing criticism and growing calls to resign on Monday after two pilots were killed and dozens of people were injured during a collision involving an Air Canada plane and a fire truck at LaGuardia Airport.

This was the second fatal crash under Duffy's leadership and in President Donald Trump's second administration, The Daily Beast noted. Duffy has been accused of putting safety at risk by not addressing the low staffing among air traffic controllers in the United States.

The Federal Aviation Administration told The Beast that the low staffing concerns were part of the investigation.

Duffy posted on X that he was headed to LaGuardia Airport following the incident, which drew a number of responses and critiques of the Trump administration official.

"Sean Duffy, Elon Musk, Trump cut FAA staff. Now we have three airline disasters in 14 months. None in the previous 16 years. Is there anything Trump touches that doesn't turn to s---?" Doug Dillman, former biochemist, wrote on X.

"You should be doing your job, not running around the country to make Trump praise content for this page," Russell Foster, former Democratic congressional candidate in Texas, wrote on X. "Spend more time working and less time sucking up."

"Ok great. And then what?? How about you all stop fighting with each other so these airports can be fully staffed for the safety of the employees and the traveling public. But who gives a s---right? Keep spreading everyone so thin till they break or something tragic happens," sports reporter Nikki Gist wrote on X.

"You need more controllers. You need to pay them more. And you need to stop the practice of 6-day duty periods with mandatory overtime. The regulations that govern pilot rest should be applied to controllers, too. Outside of that, let's see what the NTSB says about contributing factors, especially those related to the firetruck crossing an active runway," Thomas Larsen, data expert, wrote on X.

'Thrilled' Dems believe 'desperate' Trump just handed them a gift they didn't ask for

Democrats were reportedly sensing potential spring break travel pandemonium and further political fallout over President Donald Trump's decision to send federal immigration agents to airports, an analyst reported on Monday.

Author Rachel Bade wrote in a Substack post how Trump could be heading for a "rude awakening" this week as Democrats call his bluff over whether to fund the Department of Homeland Security amid the partial government shutdown. The president's move to bring U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents was expected to backfire as Democratic lawmakers were apparently predicting how voters would respond, and Democrats wouldn't be pushed to bow down to Republican demands.

"Publicly, Democrats are calling the move ridiculous. Privately, though? They’re thrilled," Bade wrote. "The way they see it, Trump’s move screams desperation and that the White House is eager to resolve this issue before the spring break travel season."

Democrats expected the administration's response to the unpaid TSA workers to create another ripple effect.

"If the White House is this rattled, Dems can squeeze even harder," Bade wrote. "Some are even betting Republicans will cave as soon as this week."

Several Democratic sources on the Hill told Bade what could happen next.

"Democrats doubt the administration is tone deaf enough to have ICE agents carry out immigration enforcement at airports," Bade wrote. "They’re skeptical agents will be checking travelers’ immigration papers, for instance. But even just the sight of ICE hanging around doors and exits will spook Americans, they insist — and make GOP immigration policy look even more chaotic and personal."

It could come down to public perception.

"One Democratic source put it to me this way: The public stopped trusting Republicans on immigration when people started seeing the chaos up close — in places like Minnesota, where enforcement hit home," Bade explained. "ICE showing up at airports would thrust the issue from the abstract into the everyday lives of millions of Americans, they argue."

‘Rats, sinking ships’: Quiet White House exit raises eyebrows

Vice President JD Vance's special adviser for the Middle East has left the Trump administration to take a new role at a lobbying firm, Bloomberg Government reported on Monday.

Wesam H. Hassanein has joined Continental Strategy LLC, a firm connected to the Trump administration and the Republican Party, the outlet reported. The native Arabic speaker said he had apparently planned to leave the White House when the U.S.-Israeli joint strikes started on Iran on Feb. 28.

“I’m not leaving because I oppose the president’s decision on Iran — I’m 100% supportive of President Trump’s decision to deny Iran nuclear weapons,” Hassanein said. “We should have done what President Trump is doing years ago.”

Hassanein previously worked for the State Department before joining the Trump administration. He said he had been mulling over several offers before selecting the firm founded by Carlos Trujillo, former Ambassador to the Organization of American States.

“Continental really, really stood out as family oriented, a family culture, with an excellent client base,” he said. “They are in total lockstep with the administration, working to advance America First policies.”

Several people reacted to the news of the latest White House exit.

"Rats, sinking ships...," Mehdi Hassan, editor-in-chief and CEO of Zeteo, wrote on X.

"VP Vance's special adviser for the Middle East, Wesam H. Hassanein, leaves role for the private sector," Jonathan Guyer, Program Director of Institute for Global Affairs, wrote on X.

"Why do they all leave when it gets hot in the kitchen?? Very weak appointees doing the Bongino," political commentator Johnny Law wrote on X.

"Why stay when POTUS does the bidding of another country to lie us into war. Get off the sinking ship," copywriter John Bethel wrote on X.

'His presidency is over': Trump gets warning he's gone past the point of no return

A professor and political analyst signaled on Monday that President Donald Trump's slipping political support will not rebound — and that it's over for him.

In an opinion piece for The Hill, John Kenneth White, professor emeritus at The Catholic University of America and author of "Grand Old Unraveling: The Republican Party, Donald Trump, and the Rise of Authoritarianism,” described just why Trump's reign has hit its limit. White outlined how Trump's promises to the American people have completely gone by the wayside as he "started a war of choice with Iran" while the economy plummets and inflation rises, harsh immigration policies that deport people indiscriminately, and his sinking approval ratings.

"But Donald Trump is governing without the consent of the governed," White wrote. "Most polls show Trump’s approval hovering around the 40 percent mark. But behind these numbers is a presidency in distress. On handling inflation and the cost of living and immigration — issues that matter to voters — Trump has dismal scores."

Trump must also reckon with the realities that surround his second term as his MAGA coalition fractures.

"The images associated with Trump have now come into focus," White wrote. "Renee Good and Alex Pretti were murdered on the streets of Minneapolis by federal immigration officials. Persons of color are fearful of being seized by masked ICE agents. Terrorized children are held in cages. Dead and wounded soldiers are returning from a war Trump started in the Middle East."

"Those images will be forever associated with Trump," White wrote. "While he still wins support from true believers, most Americans have turned on him. Hispanics who supported Trump in 2024 are repelled by his immigration policies and have deserted the Republican Party in places like Texas. Sixty-seven percent of independents, the group of voters that decides elections, disapprove of Trump’s performance."

White also predicted what the remainder of Trump's presidency could look like.

"For the next two years, Trump will retain the powers of the presidency," White wrote. "He can veto bills, issue pardons and executive orders and even wage war. But he will govern without the consent of the governed. As Abraham Lincoln famously observed: 'Public sentiment is everything. With public sentiment, nothing can fail; without it nothing can succeed.'"

"Trump cannot recover his political standing. His presidency is over," White added.

MAGA furious as it discovers likely replacement for Markwayne Mullin funded Trump nemesis

MAGA loyalists were unhappy Monday after discovering the replacement for Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-OK), oil and gas executive Alan Armstrong, had made a political contribution to one of President Donald Trump's adversaries.

Armstrong was slated to visit Trump at Mar-a-Lago with Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt to talk about the plans to appoint him to potentially serve the rest of Mullin's remaining term in the Senate as Mullin takes over to lead the Department of Homeland Security, The Daily Beast reported.

Although the details of the discussions were not immediately released, the conversation was expected to touch on Armstrong's $5,800 donation to former Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL). Kinzinger had voted to impeach Trump and the donation came around that time, according to NOTUS.

Stitt has also reportedly floated the idea of two other people replacing Mullin, including Stitt's own senior advisor Dustin Hilliary and oil and gas magnate Harold Hamm.

Some of Trump's MAGA allies were furious over the move to potentially bring Armstrong to Capitol Hill.

Right-wing activist Laura Loomer was enraged over the development.

“Has anyone told President Trump that the Governor of Oklahoma is bringing a Never Trumper who donated to a rabid anti-Trump Congressman who voted to impeach him after J6 to meet with him?” Loomer wrote on X. “Hey @SenMullin what do you think about your Never Trump replacement? Now would be a good time for you to speak up!”

Roger Stone, longtime political consultant and staunch ally of President Donald Trump, had a similar reaction.

“Alan Armstrong the Oklahoma Oil Man RINO Governor Stitt wants to appoint to the vacancy in the US Senate gave thousands of dollars to Trump enemy Little Adam Kinzinger AFTER the Jan 6 Fedsurrection,” Stone wrote on X.

Stone also added that Stitt should select Hamm to replace Mullin.

"RINO Oklahoma Gov Stitt should appoint Harold Hamm instead of Adam Kinzinger Megadonor Alan Armstrong to Oklahoma's vacancy in the US Senate," Stone wrote on X.

Co-founder of Students for Trump, Ryan Fournier, had a similar sentiment.

"Gov. Stitt is pushing for Alan Armstrong to replace Mullin in the Senate. Armstrong donated thousands to Never-Trumper Adam Kinzinger after he voted to impeach Trump," Fournier wrote on X.

Republicans get stark warning Trump-backed voting bill will blow up in their faces

WASHINGTON Democrats have continued to push back on the SAVE Act while Republicans were pushing for what President Donald Trump has called the number one GOP priority, and now the Senate plans to continue debating the controversial bill all weekend.

If passed into law, the Republican-backed legislation would require U.S. citizens to provide voter ID at the ballot box, and mail-in votes would be massively hindered. But some lawmakers have expressed concern that this could ultimately backfire on Republicans, especially ahead of the midterms and 2028 presidential election.

Sen. Mark Kelly (D-AZ) told Raw Story in an exclusive interview that the SAVE Act would greatly impact seniors and disenfranchise them — and that the legislation wasn't about making sure citizens can vote, but instead ensuring that Trump can have federal control of upcoming elections.

"Let's say you're like a senior and you don't have a passport anymore, you don't travel anymore. Maybe you never had a passport, and you can't find your birth certificate. What do you do?" Kelly said.

"I think they're OK with people not voting anymore," Kelly said. "And you can go through a long list of, I mean, we all have to re-register. We all have to get these, you know, these documents. And what if somebody doesn't want a passport? They don't, they don't travel, or they can't afford to pay for the passport. What happens to them? They get disenfranchised."

Kelly said people don't always have access to their birth certificate, creating another layer of problems for voters if the legislation passes.

"The hospital I was born in, with my birth certificate, mine comes from the hospital. That place is closed," Kelly said. "What would I do if I didn't have a passport?

"Let's say I wasn't, you know, a U.S. senator, and I'm like, OK, what do I do? Who do I contact? So they're trying to make this really, really hard for people to vote," Kelly said. "And then, you know, I think [Sen. Eric] Schmidt is going to add this amendment to try to eliminate vote by mail — 80 percent of Arizonans vote by mail. In some states, 100 percent of people vote by mail; that's the only option. And it is equally popular in Arizona with Republicans. I think we are, we're trying to save them from themselves, because this will disenfranchise possibly millions of people."

The push for the GOP legislation comes as Trump has federal authorities investigate the 2020 election results in Maricopa County, Arizona, and Fulton County, Georgia.

"I think the president just can't accept that he lost an election despite having won two for president, and he still can't accept it," Kelly said. "It's a combination of that and I think it's, he wants to try to get control over the voting infrastructure, leading up to the 2026 and 2028 elections. I think that's what that's about."

"When you have 2,000 counties and 2,000 plus county recorders, it's really hard for somebody to steal an election," Kelly said. "So when you have one entity, it gets much easier to try to influence the outcome of an election.

Trump has even complained that GOP lawmakers could find it hard to win the midterms without this legislation.

"He said he wants Republicans to control the elections in 15 states," Kelly said. "I mean, that's what he said after nationalizing the elections. Like a couple of sentences later, this is months ago now, he says, 'Yeah, I want Republicans in charge of the elections in 15 states' is what he said. What states? I imagine mine is one of them. Georgia is probably one of them, probably, you know, the ones that have those battleground states for presidential elections, probably somebody should ask him, which 15 states are you talking about?

But Democrats haven't given up.

"This bill is a big deal," Kelly said. "I mean, we passed the Voting Rights legislation in the 1960s. And now it's gonna be up to us to protect us."

The decision will rest with senators.

"I think we're gonna, we're going to do our best, you know, to save voting rights to the American people," Kelly said. "This is not about voter ID. They throw around this polling data that voter ID has 80% approval. Yeah, that's voter ID like we have in Arizona. That's not what this is."

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) told Raw Story that Republicans weren't ready to give up on passing the SAVE Act despite mounting criticism from Democrats.

"We don't want to kill the bill," Johnson said. "This is how it's really supposed to work, OK, where if you had Democrats who are constructive, that'd be fine, but they're not. They want to kill the bill, OK, it's existential to them. So we've got Republicans, you know, we've got a broad spectrum. There are people who have issues with some of the reasonable restrictions on mail-in ballots. So how can we make them reasonable for them? So let's use this process to hone this piece of legislation so that at least we'll have Republican support."

Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA) told Raw Story that despite Republican maneuvers to try to "fill the tree," a procedure where the Senate majority leader uses their role to "freeze" or control the amendment process, Democrats still were not convinced, and that they had another plan if that happened.

"Democrats feel strongly that it's an effort to disenfranchise eligible registered voters," Kaine said.

"The tree might get filled, but we can bring up privileged resolutions even if they fill the tree, as long as you're not in post, called up in the middle of anything," Kaine added.

Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), who co-sponsored the bill, told Raw Story she stands by the legislation.

"And that is something I've thought about as we've teed up the Save Act, but I am a co-sponsor, and it's important. I believe that everybody who votes be a citizen and be able to prove it," Lummis said. "That's pretty simple. Now, if we get in the weeds and start telling every state what to do, then I get uncomfortable."

Lummis said it's unclear what could happen over the next 10 days, as Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) was expected to potentially delay its recess, according to reports.

"I think we're all a little curious," Lummis added.