Trump busted for using chaotic video from GOP-led state to fuel Chicago crackdown

President Donald Trump got busted for posting video of an immigration crackdown in a Republican-governed state to attack Democratic leaders.

The White House a graphic video on its official X account showing masked agents kicking down doors and making arrests as a voiceover recorded by Trump calls Chicago a mess and attacks the local Democratic officials, as the words “ILLEGAL CRIMINAL ALIENS, CARTELS, AND GANGS ARE POISONING OUR KIDS" appear on screen, reported The Daily Beast.

“An incompetent Mayor,” read the post's caption. “A delusional Governor. Chicago is in chaos, and the American people are paying the price. Chicago doesn’t need political spin — it needs HELP.”

The president posted the video on his own Truth Social account to spread its reach as he prepared to deploy National Guard troops in Illinois, but there was a problem with his justification for a military crackdown.

"The Daily Beast can reveal that much of the footage was actually filmed in April in Florida, the state home to Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence — with a big giveaway being that it features palm trees, which are not known to grow in Chicago," the website reported.

The freely available online video footage actually shows Department of Homeland Security’s Operation Tidal Wave, which officials described in May as the “largest joint immigration operation in Florida history" and boasted “led to 1,120 criminal alien arrests," and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker's team made fun of the Trump administration's attempt at disinformation.

“We know the lies don’t just come out of their mouth," Pritzker's office said. “So it’s not surprising that the Trump team spends more time producing videos purporting images of Florida as Illinois — rather than spending any time to lower prices or protect healthcare for hardworking Americans.”

Illinois has challenged the deployment in court, arguing the president's order violates violates the Posse Comitatus Act prohibiting the use of the military forces for domestic law enforcement.

A federal judge ruled last month that Trump's deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles was unlawful because they were engaged in impermissible law enforcement work, which Illinois has cited as a persuasive authority, but the White House argues the troops are necessary to “protect federal officers and assets.”

'Straight challenge to MAGA': Trump's fans rage at Pope Leo's 'woke manifesto'

Pope Leo XIV issued another document that seemingly puts him in direct odds against President Donald Trump's MAGA movement.

The first American-born pontiff has angered U.S. conservatives with recent statements and comments supporting immigrants and climate action, and he has sharply criticized market capitalism, warlike rhetoric, anti-abortion activism and, in a new document, wealth inequality, reported the Associated Press.

“God has a special place in his heart for those who are discriminated against and oppressed, and he asks us, his church, to make a decisive and radical choice in favor of the weakest,” Leo wrote. "Thus, in a world where the poor are increasingly numerous, we paradoxically see the growth of a wealthy elite, living in a bubble of comfort and luxury, almost in another world compared to ordinary people."

Leo has echoed his predecessor Pope Francis, who angered conservatives and wealthy Catholics by frequently criticizing capitalism, and he said in a recent interview that his being American gives him unique insight into the topic.

“The fact that I am American means, among other things, people can’t say, like they did about Francis, ‘he doesn’t understand the United States, he just doesn’t see what’s going on,’” Leo told Crux, a Catholic site.

Leo's new papal document is based on an unfinished text started by Francis and singles out Christians who embrace “secular ideologies or political and economic approaches that lead to gross generalizations and mistaken conclusions."

“The fact that some dismiss or ridicule charitable works, as if they were an obsession on the part of a few and not the burning heart of the church’s mission, convinces me of the need to go back and reread the Gospel, lest we risk replacing it with the wisdom of this world,” Leo wrote.

The pope infuriated conservatives with his response to a question about the archdiocese of his hometown of Chicago, which rescinded a lifetime achievement award to Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) for his work on immigration due to controversy on his support for abortion rights, and Leo said people cannot call themselves “pro-life” if they stand against abortion but endorse “inhuman treatment” of migrants or support the death penalty.

“He weighs into the abortion question through remarks that are absolutely scandalous,” said John-Henry Westen, founder of the conservative-Catholic Sign of the Cross Media last week on a podcast. "He actually says if you call yourself pro-life and you’re in favor of the death penalty you’re not really pro-life.”

A priest in a conservative parish in North Carolina told the Washington Post that many of his traditionalist parishioners were “concerned” about Leo’s views on migrants.

“I can say that my parishioners are saying something along the lines, of ‘why doesn’t he just focus on the church,'” the priest said. “I think people here generally think that the Holy Father, or anyone outside the United States, doesn’t understand what immigration looks like in the United States on the day-to-day ground level. They think he doesn’t fully understand the scope of it. Even he has walls in Vatican City.”

The pope's statements were widely seen on social media as a condemnation of American conservatism.

"Oh, he’s not messing," said attorney Tim O'Connor. "This is a straight challenge to MAGA."

"Pope Leo Invokes Criticism of Trump's Policies in 1st Major Document," agreed Newsmax's Logan Ratick.

"It is simply another Woke-Liberal-Socialist manifesto that will continue to lead the Faithful astray!" complained "Bishop" Christopher Richard, self-described priest of the "Old Catholic Church." "Leo XIV = Francis 2.0!"

"MAGA: The pope has no business spouting this woke antifa rhetoric taken straight from the New Testament!" posted writer Bill Shea.

"'Shut up and sprinkle incense,'" joked Philadelphia Inquirer columnist Will Bunch.

"The Catholic Church: famously known for staying out of politics and state affairs," replied academic Siobhán McElduff.

"Stand with whomever you like, Woke Pope Leo," snarled X user Heather Langford. "Many of these illegal migrants raping, torturing, slaughtering our own people. It is captured on camera for evidence. God will not be impressed with your spiritual leadership. Or your bleeding heart. With mayhem around you."

Republican mom lights up Mike Johnson on CSPAN: 'I'm disappointed in my party and you'

A Republican military spouse lit up House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) during an appearance on CSPAN's "Washington Journal."

The Louisiana Republican appeared Thursday morning on the program to face questions about the ongoing government shutdown and the health care funding impasse keeping Democrats from backing a GOP budget bill, and a woman from Virginia called in to express her disappointment with Johnson's leadership.

"So my question or comments are related to what you said yesterday about not being open to pass any legislation until we make sure that the military gets paid, I want you to hear a little bit about my family," said the woman, who said her name is Samantha. "I have two medically fragile children, I have a husband who actively served his country. If we see a lapse in pay, my children do not get the medication that is needed for them to live their life, so we live paycheck-to-paycheck. I heard you say that you side with President Trump and I just read an article that says he wholeheartedly believes there needs to be legislation put in so that we do not miss a paycheck. You have the power to do that."

"As a Republican I am disappointed in my party and in you because you do have the power to call the House back," she added. "You refused to do that. I am begging you to pass this legislation. My kids could die. We don't have the credit because of the medical bills that I have to pay it regularly. You could stop this and you could be the one that could say the military is getting paid. I think it is awful for someone who make six figures a year to do this to a military family."

Johnson tried to reassure the caller that he shared her concerns and would take any action necessary to prevent her family from missing a paycheck.

"I am sorry to hear about your situation, and the reason I have been so angry – and they've been calling me out on media, 'Johnson's angry,'" Johnson told her. "And I am angry because of situations like yours. I have a big military district, my district is the home of the Global Strike Command at Barksdale Air Force Base and Fort Polk, the Joint Readiness Training Center. I have one of the biggest military districts, military families, in America. I have a lot of airmen and soldiers who are deployed right now and have young families at home and children in health situations like yours. This is what keeps me up at night."

"I want you to hear something clearly, the Republicans are the ones delivering for you," he added. "We had a vote to pay the troops and it was the continuing resolution three weeks ago. Every Republican but two voted to keep the government open so your paycheck can flow. Every Democrat in the House except for one voted to close. Democrats are the ones preventing you from getting a check. If we did another vote on the floor to pay troops, it's not a lawmaking exercise because Chuck Schumer will hold it up in the Senate. He is demonstrating by voting now six times to keep the government closed and does not want the troops to be paid, and you should listen to his comments last night, as reported this morning. He is enjoying this. He said every day gets better for us, quote-unquote. Chuck Schumer and the Democrats are preventing your family from getting the care they need, not Republicans. My heart goes out to you."

- YouTube youtu.be

James Comer faces new pressure in Epstein probe after SCOTUS rejects Maxwell appeal

The U.S. Supreme Court's rejection of sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal puts House Oversight Chairman James Comer (R-KY) under new pressure in the committee's Jeffrey Epstein investigation, according to a new report.

Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA), the Oversight Committee's top Democrat, sent a letter Thursday demanding Comer schedule a long-promised deposition with the late Epstein's co-conspirator now that her Supreme Court appeal has been settled, reported NOTUS.

“Maxwell’s crimes and her central role in Epstein’s sex trafficking operation position her as a critical witness with knowledge relevant and fundamental to this Committee’s investigation,” Garcia said in the letter. “Accordingly, and pursuant to the subpoena issued by this committee. I urge you to immediately schedule the deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell.”

Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN) led the committee's effort to issue a subpoena to Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year conviction for sex trafficking underage girls, in July, after President Donald Trump's deputy attorney general and former defense attorney interviewed her in prison days before she was transferred to a minimum security prison.

Comer wrote in subpoena cover letter that the committee sought Maxwell’s testimony “to inform the consideration of potential legislative solutions to improve federal efforts to combat sex trafficking and reform the use of non-prosecution agreements and/or plea agreements in sex-crime investigations.”

However, the scheduled Aug. 11 deposition was paused at the request of Maxwell's attorneys until after the Supreme Court decided on her appeal, which the justices declined to hear earlier this week, and Trump left the door open to a pardon for his former associate when asked by a reporter.

“Just this week, Donald Trump said he would ‘take a look’ at a pardon for Maxwell, which is disgusting and shameful,” Garcia said in a statement to NOTUS. “The Supreme Court was right to reject her latest attempt to avoid accountability, and now, she must face us for questioning.”

Garcia's letter to Comer indicated that he does not trust Republicans' commitment to fully investigating the Epstein case.

“I hope that you will stand by your statements and uphold the Committee’s commitment to transparency and to the victims of Epstein’s horrific abuse,” Garcia wrote.

Ex-Trump aide stuns CNN panel into silence with prediction about Nobel Peace Prize

A former aide to President Donald Trump stunned his fellow panelists on "CNN This Morning" into silence with his prediction about the Nobel Peace Prize.

The U.S. president has openly campaigned for the award since returning to office in January, just days before the deadline for submission for this year's prize, and he's also made it quite clear that he covets the medallion because his longtime nemesis Barack Obama won it during his first year in office.

"My colleague actually asked President Trump yesterday about the Nobel Peace Prize and whether or not he thought that he was going to get it, and he said he didn't know," said Francesca Chambers, White House correspondent for USA Today. "Perhaps maybe they'll give it to him, so he still wants it, though, clearly."

Trump's hunger for the prize has shaped his diplomatic efforts and may have pushed Hamas and Israeli officials to reach a ceasefire agreement just hours before the award is announced, and his onetime White House communications director Mike Dubke told the panel not to count him out.

"The likelihood of Donald Trump getting the Nobel Peace Prize is like having an American pope," Dubke said.

Three seconds passed in silence as the realization dawned on panelists that the American-born Pope Leo XIV was elected earlier this year, and Dubke continued.

"My point on this is he deserves it," Dubke said. "No, I mean, if not Donald Trump, who... There's multiple places where there has been peace in the last six months because of Donald Trump. This is a award that was created by the inventor of dynamite, Donald Trump authorized the bombing of Iran, which I would make the argument without that the others in the Middle East wouldn't have come to the table for yesterday's peace deal."

Trump frequently claims to have ended up to seven wars in his nearly nine months back in office, although other world leaders are less generous in their credit, and another former White House aide joked the committee might as well give him the prize to shut him up.

"I would say give it to him so we can stop talking about it, because it is so obnoxious that he thinks he should get it," said Meghan Hays, who served as special assistant to the president and director of message planning for Joe Biden. "I mean, we could go through all the number of reasons why he shouldn't get it. He's going to invade Greenland, the rights he wants to take away from press."

Host Audie Cornish stepped in to say that Trump had not actually discussed invading Greenland, although the Danish prime minister said as recently as this week that the U.S. president was still interested in somehow obtaining the territory, and she discussed his primary motivation for winning the prize.

"The villain origin story of this is when Obama won the Nobel Prize and the perception on the right was he did not deserve it," Cornish said.

Hays went on to list Trump's attacks on civil liberties and other reasons she doesn't think he deserves the prize, and Dubke argued that Obama didn't deserve his award, either.

"All of your reasons have nothing to do with [what] the prize is given for," Dubke said. "It's like somebody goes into the hall of fame, but we're not going to put them in the hall of fame for their actions on the field because of their personal life. It's not all-encompassing for their entire."

- YouTube youtu.be

GOP lawmakers privately 'frustrated' by Trump's shutdown moves as Dems refuse to give in

Republican congressional leaders have been quietly warning the White House not to move forward with plans to decimate the federal workforce and shred the social safety net under cover of the government shutdown.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) and other senior Republicans have advised President Donald Trump and his aides against far-reaching cuts and firings – all Project 2025 priorities – that could turn voters against them, and GOP lawmakers are growing uneasy with the White House strategy as Democrats are refusing to play along, reported the Wall Street Journal.

"The Republican hand-wringing reflects discomfort among some in the party over the president’s shutdown strategy," the Journal reported. "Soon after government funding lapsed last week, Trump said the shutdown gave him an 'unprecedented opportunity' to make cuts at agencies. White House officials have said they are considering firing thousands of federal workers and have raised the possibility that some workers won’t get back pay."

"The White House strategy is aimed at putting pressure on Democrats to reach a deal to reopen the government," the report added. "But Democrats have refused to budge, arguing that Republicans first need to agree to extend expiring healthcare subsidies upon which millions of Americans rely."

The administration so far hasn't carried out the layoffs Trump threatened, although he said this week that option was still on the table, and his advisers have pledged to use tariff revenue to preserve funding for a food program for women, infants and children, but the president rattled Republicans by claiming he was working with Democrats on a deal to extend Affordable Care Act subsidies.

"Democratic lawmakers quickly said no such talks were under way and Trump later clarified on social media that he was 'happy to work with' the Democrats, but only after the government reopens," the Journal reported. "The mixed messaging from the president has frustrated some Republicans, who have said they are eager for Trump to chart a clear path forward for dealing with the shutdown."

The White House and Republicans are united around the message that Democrats are solely to blame for the shutdown, and GOP lawmakers insist negotiations shouldn't even start until they vote to reopen the government, but they also understand that strategy carries real risks.

"The simmering tension among Republicans comes as Democrats, who for months have struggled to recover from their losses in the recent election, have united around a shutdown message focused on healthcare," the Journal reported. "White House officials and some Republicans have privately acknowledged that they could take a political hit if voters blame them for higher healthcare costs. Ending the subsidies would result in higher premiums for more than 20 million people."

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) has been waiting for Republicans to blink, as hundreds of thousands of federal workers are furloughed and others have been working without pay, and some of them – including military service members – could soon start missing paychecks.

"Presidents have some discretion over the effects of a shutdown, including which agency functions are given priority and which workers get furloughed," the Journal reported. "But if the shutdown continues, the pain from the shutdown will be difficult to avoid. People close to Thune and top Republicans said they acknowledge that without a spending deal, the government will be forced to make hard decisions."

'Covering up for pedophiles': Dem lobs ugly accusation at Mike Johnson in public spat

An impromptu meeting between two Arizona Democrats and House Speaker Mike Johnson quickly turned ugly over a vote to release the Jeffery Epstein files.

Johnson walked out of his office Wednesday and ran into Sens. Mark Kelly and Ruben Gallego, who were speaking to reporters in the Capitol hallway, and he greeted them with a collegial "hey, gentlemen."

Gallego asked the speaker to explain the delay on swearing in Adelita Grijalva, another Arizona Democrat who won a special election last month to replace her late father in the House, and Johnson said he'd be happy to hold the ceremony once Senate Democrats agree to support a Republican government funding bill.

"Reopen the government so we can get back to work," Johnson said.

Gallego pushed back, saying Johnson keeps changing the terms for swearing her in, and Kelly pointed out that he swore in two Florida Republicans, Reps. Jimmy Patronis and Randy Fine, right away in what are called pro forma sessions.

"They had all their family and friends here, so we went through the process," Johnson said, and he brushed off Gallego's attempt to interrupt. "Let me answer the question if you're going to ask it."

Johnson said Grijalva had not scheduled a date for her oath because she was elected after the House out of session, and Gallego accused him of stalling over the discharge petition that Grijalva has said she would sign and thus force a floor vote on the Epstein files.

"You don't want the Epstein discharge," Gallego said.

"Totally absurd," Johnson replied, and his voice rose in pitch after Gallego accused him of stringing Grijalva along. "No, I'm not! It has nothing to do with Epstein."

Johnson argued that the GOP-led House Oversight Committee was conducting an investigation on the Epstein matter, but Gallego wasn't buying it.

"You know she's key to the discharge petition," he said. "You just keep coming up with excuses. This is an excuse so she doesn't sign on to that."

The two men then shouted over one another, according to NBC News correspondent Julie Tsirkin, and Gallego accused Johnson of “covering up for pedophiles."


House Dems turn up the heat on DOJ official for handling of Homan bribery allegations

Democrats are putting pressure on a Department of Justice official as they step up their investigation of bribery allegations against White House "border czar" Tom Homan.

Senate Democrats grilled Attorney General Pam Bondi on Tuesday over whether Homan returned a purported $50,000 bribe, and House Democrats sent a letter to Associate Attorney General Edmund Woodward demanding his response after Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel "failed to answer" questions about the matter last month, reported Axios.

"We write now to follow up and demand that you answer fundamental questions," read the letter, signed by Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) and other lawmakers. "Who knew about the Homan cash bribery scandal, when did they know it, and why was Mr. Homan appointed 'Border Czar' even in the face of such damning evidence of his taking bribes for government contracts?"

The lawmakers pointed out that Woodward led the vetting of candidates for administration jobs for the Trump transition team, which they said should have been made aware under standard FBI and DOJ procedure.

"We have every reason to believe the normal process was followed here," the lawmakers said.

FBI agents posing as business executives recorded Homan last year accepting $50,000 in cash after indicating he could help them win government contracts in a second Trump administration, but the case stalled after the Republican president returned to office in January and was closed in recent weeks by Trump appointees.

The federal investigation was opened last summer in Texas after a subject in a separate investigation claimed Homan was soliciting bribes in exchange for awarding contracts if Trump won the presidential election.

House Democrats asked Woodward whether any other Trump appointees were "the targets of ongoing criminal investigations."

Charlie Kirk's group chases anti-fascism professor out of the country

A history professor is abruptly leaving the U.S. after a conservative group founded by the late Charlie Kirk singled him out for persecution, according to a report on Wednesday.

Mark Bray, who has taught about antifascist movements at Rutgers University since 2019, notified students Sunday that his courses would immediately move online as he and his family prepared to flee the country for their safety, reported the Washington Post.

“Since my family and I do not feel safe in our home at the moment, we are moving for the year to Europe,” Bray told students by email. “Truly I am so bummed about not being able to spend time with you all in the classroom.”

Far-right social media accounts called attention to Bray in late September, after news outlets quoted his remarks about President Donald Trump’s executive order designating antifa as a “domestic terrorist organization," and the Washington Post confirmed three death threats sent to the professor since Sept. 26.

One online activist called him a “domestic terrorist professor," while another shared his home address in New Jersey, and the Rutgers chapter of the conservative student group Turning Point USA, which was founded by the late Kirk, launched a petition Thursday demanding Bray's firing, referring to Trump's executive order and smearing the educator as a threat to their safety.

Bray decided to move his family to Spain for the rest of the year, and he's optimistic they'll be able to return one day.

“I’m hopeful about returning, and I’m hopeful — and I say this as a history professor — that someday we will look back on this as a cautionary tale about authoritarianism,” Bray said.

The university told the Post that administrators were aware of the Turning Point USA petition and Bray's message to students.

“We are gathering more information about this evolving situation,” the university said in a statement.

Bray, the author of four books on anarchism and antifa, also faced widespread criticism when he told NBC News’s “Meet the Press” in 2017, while a lecturer at Dartmouth University, that violence was sometimes justified, after the deadly “Unite the Right” white supremacist rally in Charlottesville.

Dartmouth's president at the time condemned Bray in a statement and accused him “supporting violent protest," but more than 100 of the university's faculty members rallied around him.

Turning Point USA did not respond to requests for comment on the report, but the Trump administration justified the threats he received by blaming Kirk's assassination, which remains under investigation, on "Democrat violence," but Bray characterized the threats chasing him to Europe as part of the president's crackdown on academic freedom.

“There’s been a concerted attack on universities, and I feel like this is a facet of that," Bray said, "to make it so that professors who conduct research on protest movements don’t feel safe sharing their research or teaching about topics that the administration doesn’t like.”

Trump accused of 'threatening democracy' with jail threats against Illinois officials

President Donald Trump amplified fears about his authoritarian ambitions by calling for the Illinois governor and Chicago mayor to be jailed as he deploys National Guard troops in the nation's third-largest city.

Troops from the Texas National Guard arrived Tuesday to assist in crackdowns on immigration and violent crime, but Gov. JB Pritzker vowed to challenge Trump's order and Mayor Brandon Johnson signed an executive order prohibiting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other federal agencies from using city property for civil immigration enforcement.

The president, in response, called for both elected officials to be imprisoned.

"Chicago Mayor should be in jail for failing to protect Ice Officers!" Trump posted on Truth Social Wednesday morning. "Governor Pritzker also!"

Neither official has been accused of committing a crime, and both of them defiantly responded to his post.

"Trump is now calling for the arrest of elected representatives checking his power," Pritzker posted. "What else is left on the path to full-blown authoritarianism?"

"This is not the first time Trump has tried to have a Black man unjustly arrested," Johnson responded. "I'm not going anywhere."

Many other social media users also expressed alarm about the president's demand.

"The current President of the United States is militarizing our streets, creating a police state, and demanding the imprisonment of state & local elected officials he doesn’t like," posted former Republican congressman Joe Walsh. "Tell me again he isn’t a fascist. Go ahead."

"They are shooting ministers with pepper balls and the President is threatening to imprison a Governor," said Sen. Brian Schatz (D-HI). "There is no red line for these Republicans, even the good ones. They are gonna 'pick their spots' on the road to us becoming Belarus."

"Trump said this stuff all the time in the first term and people blew it off because DOJ ignored him," added former State Department spokesman Matthew Miller. "But with the Comey indictment and other investigations into his enemies list this term, have to take these threats deadly seriously. He means it, and so does the bureaucracy."

"If blue state governors and mayors aren't already thinking about the reliability of various police forces nominally under their control, they should start immediately," warned The American Prospect's Ryan Cooper.

"When Reuters (Reuters!) does the most straightforward, bloodless, nonpartisan headline possible and still comes up with ['Trump calls for jailing Democratic leaders as troops prepare for Chicago deployment']," noted Zeteo's Asawin Suebsaeng.

"If we’re drawing up a list of people who should be in jail..." mused journalist Mark Chadbourn.

"Donald Trump is calling for the Chicago mayor and Illinois governor to be locked up because they won’t bend the knee to his fascism and legitimize his lies and propaganda," wrote Democratic activist Melanie D’Arrigo. "Locking up political opponents to crush dissent is fascism, whether you like the word or not."

"The Trump administration is not just picking fights with blue states, the President is (again) threatening democracy," posted Rodger Payne, an international relations professor at the University of Louisville. "The leaders Trump wants to jail were elected democratically -- and unlike Trump, both easily exceeded support from over 50% of the electorate."

Two governors get Stephen Miller's authoritarian scheme — and how to fight it: report

Two governors understand the authoritarian threat Stephen Miller poses to the nation, according to an analyst, who argued that's why they're some of the only elected officials who are meeting the moment.

President Donald Trump's influential deputy chief of staff is using the MAGA disinformation machine polarize and inflame the debate over his dictatorial crackdown on Democratic-led cities and states, which The New Republic's Greg Sargent wrote forces Americans to take sides in the standoff – driving many of them to accept authoritarian rule.

"Miller believes that if he supercharges the debate over Trump's abuses of power with enough propaganda, he can polarize it and nudge low-info voters into accepting authoritarianism," Sargent wrote.

"Do Democratic leaders broadly have their own theory about this moment? It’s unclear," Sargent added. "But here’s what we can divine right now: Governors J.B. Pritzker of Illinois and Gavin Newsom of California do have one. They grasp Miller’s theory of the case, and they are responding in kind, with their own war for attention, on the intuition that voters will side with the rule of law over authoritarian dictatorshipif they are presented with this as a clear choice."

Trump is threatening to invoked the Insurrection Act, which he's been itching to do since his first term, and judges who've blocked him from sending troops into Portland and other cities have noticed that he's making up facts to justify his invasion.

"The specter of Portland 'burning' is dimwitted MAGA propaganda," Sargent wrote. "But Trump is now nakedly threatening to invoke the notorious nineteenth-century act if Democratic governors or the courts lawfully exercise their roles in our constitutional schema, in a way that displeases him."

In an inverse of reality, Miller declared that judges were "insurrectionists" for blocking Trump from deploying troops in American cities based on outright fabrications or old video footage he saw on Fox News, and Sargent said the White House adviser seems to be pushing the president to declare war on the country's own citizens.

"Miller appears to want Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act," Sargent wrote. "It’s likely that Miller, a master manipulator lurking furtively behind the despot’s throne, frequently uses the word 'insurrection' about Trump’s opponents to lodge it deep in Trump’s brainstem and make invocation of the Act more likely."

Strong majorities of Americans oppose Trump using the military for immigration crackdowns and law enforcement, but Newsom and Pritzker understand that Miller believes that opposition isn't strong enough to survive constant onslaught on social media.

"In this understanding of politics," Sargent wrote, "what really matters is the political attention economy, and how conflict plays within it. Supercharging searing civil tensions over jarring high-profile events drives attention, jolts low-propensity voters out of their information ruts, and compels them to really take sides."

"Pritzker and Newsom see it as a defining challenge of this moment that Trump is consolidating authoritarian power daily, and using it to subjugate and dominate Blue America as if it’s akin to an enemy nation within," he added. "If Democrats sit this debate out, Miller has calculated, Trump’s deceptions can flood public information spaces, persuading low-info, low-attention voters that his autocratic encroachments constitute a proportional response to the civic unrest he keeps propagandizing about."

'This presidency is failing us' : Military families hitting up food pantries amid shutdown

Military families are hitting up food pantries as they brace for missed paychecks after President Donald Trump floated the possibility that some federal workers might not get paid during the government shutdown.

Service members got paid Oct. 1, but their families are stockpiling food and lining up potential loans in case their next paychecks don't arrive on Oct. 15 as scheduled, reported CNN.

“We should never put our troops in this position,” said one military spouse. “We should never put their families in this position. The economy for military spouses is tough enough as it is.”

Trump signed a law during the longest government shutdown in 2019 ensuring that federal workers would receive back pay during funding lapses, but his current Office of Management and Budget issued a new memo stating that Congress must decide whether to dole out paychecks covering those periods.

“There are some people that don’t deserve to be taken care of, and we’ll take care of them in a different way,” Trump said Tuesday during a White House event, but he backtracked a bit when asked about the law he signed. “I follow the law, and what the law says is correct.”

Military children have already had their after-school programs and activities – "even homework club," according to one parent – canceled by the funding lapse, which has created problems for parents trying to juggle work schedules with child care.

“We are out of the workforce in higher numbers because of the military lifestyle, not by choice,” said one military spouse. “So, we don’t have that cushion of a second income always. It’s not a guarantee.”

The organization overseeing Department of Defense schools has sent out guidance exempting extracurricular activities from the shutdown, allowing them to resume this week, but military families have had their routines disrupted and driven parents to wait in long lines at food pantries in case they go for extended periods without pay.

“Regardless of who is in office, I will always respect the office of the presidency,” said one military spouse, who also served in the armed forces. “However, I do feel like this presidency is failing us. I feel, instead of being united, we’re being divided, and I feel like supporting the troops should be a bipartisan issue, period.”

Another military spouse criticized Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who has publicly blamed Democrats for the shutdown, for ordering senior military leaders to travel at taxpayer expense from all over the globe to deliver a highly political message alongside the president.

“How are you going to bring all these top leaders in to talk about — ‘Hey, don’t be fat and shave’ — then the next day, the government shuts down?” that spouse said. “You are basically telling these people, ‘Okay, now you’re not going to get paid and you are going to get kicked out if you don’t shave.’”

Hegseth conceded that a prolonged shutdown could cut into some training exercises – which could cost service members paychecks and prevent them from maintaining necessary certifications – and families also fear a lengthy funding pause could impact the future for their children, especially older teens.

“Seniors need these activities for college applications, which are in full swing right now, and many kids earn scholarships for college from their sports performance,” said one military spouse. “Kids were counting on being recruited, and for some, that is their only path to college.”


'Problematic': Prosecutors reportedly found key witness undermined their James Comey case

Federal prosecutors concluded a central witness would actually undermine their case against former FBI Director James Comey, according to reporting.

Law professor Daniel Richman, who prosecutors allege Comey authorized to leak information to the media, told investigators the former FBI director had instructed him at least twice not to engage with journalists and unequivocally did not authorize him to provide information to a reporter before the 2016 election, according to sources who spoke to ABC News.

"According to prosecutors who investigated the circumstances surrounding Comey's 2020 testimony for two months, using Richman's testimony to prove that Comey knowingly provided false statements to Congress would result in 'likely insurmountable problems' for the prosecution," the network reported.

Investigators stated their concerns about the case last month in a lengthy memo advocating against criminal charges, according to sources familiar with the document, but President Donald Trump replaced the lead investigator with a loyalist aide, Lindsey Halligan, who quickly presented the case to a grand jury and secured an indictment.

Halligan alleges that Comey intentionally misled Congress in 2017 and 2020 when he testified that he'd never authorized anyone to provide information anonymously to reporters, but Richman told investigators last month that he had never served as an anonymous source or acted on Comey's direction when he led the FBI, and he said Comey told him at least twice specifically not to speak with the press.

Investigators who looked at material from Comey's emails, including messages to Richman, could not find any instance where he approved the anonymous leak of information to a reporter, sources said.

​'This could boomerang on Republicans': MTG's break on key issue reveals GOP's big worries

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene's break with her party on the key issue driving the government shutdown is a leading indicator of the political blowback Republicans are risking in the funding fight.

The Georgia Republican called for action on expiring Obamacare subsidies, which she complained would cause insurance premiums to double next year for her constituents, as well as her own adult children, and a former GOP lawmaker told "CNN This Morning" the far-right MAGA firebrand was signaling anxiety within the conservative coalition.

"Ordinarily the party making the policy demand typically gets blamed," said former congressman Charlie Dent. "However, in this era of Trump with, you know, with the president himself saying a lot of good can happen in a shutdown, [budget] director] Russ Vought threatening to run wild and massively lay off federal employees. This could boomerang back on Republicans. But I don't think anybody really wins this thing. I don't think will have an impact on the midterms, either."

Democratic strategist Antjuan Seawright wasn't so sure, arguing the numbers at stake for Affordable Care Act participants were too big to ignore.

"Part of this truth decay has become a large component of this conversation," Seawright said. "This conversation, this disagreement is not about illegals receiving health care or illegal immigrants, because you have to have a Social Security number in order to qualify for the ACA subsidies. What Republicans are conflating is Ronald Reagan's law that says if you go to a hospital, you have to be seen, by law. Republicans have not rolled back that clause. But let me tell you what this is about: 18.2 million Americans in red states receive those ACA subsidies, 5.8 [million] in blue states, 76 percent of those who receive those subsidies are in places where Trump won."

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) and Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) are demanding Democrats cave on the health care subsidies and reopen the government first, but Seawright argued that Greene's break showed that Republicans are worried about the issue.

"This is a bipartisan nonpartisan conversation, and if you are a working-class American in this country paying $350 to $450 a month for ACA, that's going to go up to about $1,500 to $1,800 a month," Seawright said. "So this idea that Republicans have been intentional about defunding health care and deprioritizing health care is an argument that I think Democrats should continue to elevate. Why? Because it will come back to haunt Republicans in the midterms."

- YouTube youtu.be

'This is worse': Ex-prosecutor shames Bondi for performative stunts in Senate hearing

A former federal prosecutor highlighted some of what he said were unusual tactics Attorney General Pam Bondi employed against Democratic senators in a combative hearing.

President Donald Trump's attorney general appeared Tuesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee, where she appeared to be reading from a sheet of opposition research to attack Democrats on personal and political levels. Politico's Ankush Khardori said she had stepped up her combative stance.

"I'm not surprised, she has been doing this all year," Khardori, a former Justice Department prosecutor, told CNN. "She did this in the oversight hearings on the DOJ's budget. All of this actually, this is worse. She's more aggressive, I think, because the DOJ is under more public pressure.

"She's just putting up more of a show, but it was the same stuff. Like, she will respond to criticism from Democratic members with vitriol and non-sequiturs, right. So say, well, why don't you care about this crime that happened on this date? And she pulls from these notes and stuff that she has in her little book.

"At the same time, she goes around accusing other people of reading from scripts. A little ridiculous."

"This is worse than I've seen," Khardori added. "I'm not surprised that the core elements are still there, an intensely partisan attorney general, someone whose objective seems to be first and foremost to serve the interests of President Trump and the Republican Party, and to really, really see herself as serving one man who she effusively praises at every available turn, the president and the interests of the Republican Party. I mean, this is an extraordinary shift and change in just eight months in the public profile and posture of the nation's top law enforcement official."


- YouTube youtu.be