Top Stories Daily Listen Now
RawStory

US News

Trump runs into 'major problem' as he fails to make good on DHS promise: analyst

A Donald Trump memo on Friday ordering the Department of Homeland Security to “provide each and every employee of D.H.S. with the compensation and benefits” they’d have earned if the department weren’t shut down looks good on paper but is worthless without congressional approval.

According to MS NOW's Hayes Brown in an article called Trump’s DHS paycheck promise is a major problem, Trump's memo is a political sleight of hand designed to score points while avoiding congressional responsibility. "Until Congress says otherwise, the Department of Homeland Security doesn't have the money to make good on this promise."

Trump is setting another dangerous precedent that threatens the balance of power in America. By promising to pay DHS employees out of money Congress never appropriated, the president is claiming executive authority that doesn't exist.

The memo builds on an earlier directive ordering Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin and OMB chief Russ Vought to find the money for TSA backpay by redirecting funds from other agency accounts. The administration has never publicly explained which funding streams were actually tapped — though it's possible ICE and Border Patrol budgets were raided to cover the costs.

"Use funds that have a reasonable and logical nexus to TSA operations to provide TSA employees with the compensation and benefits that would have accrued to them," the earlier memo instructed.

Friday's new memo is equally vague about which accounts will be plundered to pay more than a quarter-million DHS employees. It merely declares that once Congress restores funding, "every effort should be made" to "adjust applicable funding accounts within DHS" to essentially make it like this whole thing never happened.

The financial shell game was already troubling when limited to TSA workers. Applying the same logic to the entire DHS workforce — without any new appropriation from Congress — is a constitutional breach that can't be accepted as settled.

Here's the fundamental problem: there is no presidential American Express card. Trump cannot spend money Congress hasn't appropriated, no matter how many memos he signs or how politically appealing the gesture appears.

The White House is betting no one will challenge this power grab. After all, who wants to sue to recover money from FEMA staffers? But that political calculation shouldn't prevent defending constitutional safeguards. "The safeguards that prevent the Treasury itself from becoming an at-will checking account for the executive branch should be defended at all costs."

Trump admin lawyers ‘obligated’ to greenlight ‘violently illegal’ war plans: US official

A senior U.S. official revealed Monday that lawyers within the Trump administration “are obligated” to greenlight war plans – even those that appear “violently illegal” – and that those who shoot down such plans have mostly been removed or departed themselves, Zeteo reported.

“According to sources with direct knowledge of the matter, the position in the White House and the Pentagon is that if Trump and his lieutenants demand something that sounds violently illegal, the lawyers in those buildings ‘are obligated to get to a Yes,’ one senior US official tells us,” Zeteo’s report reads. “The ones who would vigorously say ‘no, you can’t do this’ have largely been purged or left.”

Keep reading... Show less

'Pre-war prices' might never return – despite Trump's contrary claims: economist

While President Donald Trump has repeatedly insisted that prices would fall “rapidly” once his administration’s war against Iran ends, a prominent economist on Monday not only rejected that claim, but warned that “pre-war prices” may never return in the United States.

“I don’t think we’re going back to the pre-war prices for the foreseeable future,” said Mark Zandi, the chief economist of Moody’s Analytics and among the first economists to predict the 2008 financial crisis, speaking with Politico for its report Monday. “Certainly won’t be this year, won’t even be next year. Might not be ever.”

Keep reading... Show less

Musk's armed bodyguards allowed to roam federal buildings without training: report

Elon Musk's bodyguards were granted federal law enforcement authority without basic training or experience — a shocking breach of security protocols that allowed the world's wealthiest person's security detail to move through federal buildings with deputized agent credentials they had no business carrying.

According to reporting from MS NOW's David Ingram and Ryan J. Reilly, the U.S. Marshals Service released emails and documents obtained by Democracy Forward, a progressive advocacy group that sued to access the records. The revelations expose how corners were cut to accommodate Musk during his brief tenure as a senior adviser to President Trump overseeing the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from January through May.

The timeline exposes the casual disregard for federal law enforcement standards. In early February, as Musk was actively working to dismantle federal agencies like the U.S. Agency for International Development, the Marshals Service began considering deputizing his security detail.

But there was an obvious problem: Musk's bodyguards didn't meet basic federal law enforcement requirements.

According to an email dated February 10, at least some members of Musk's security detail lacked the fundamental credentials necessary for deputization. Specifically, "they had not successfully completed a 'basic law enforcement training program' or did not possess at least one year of law enforcement experience with an agency that had general arrest authority."

That should have been the end of it. Instead, it was merely a speedbump.

Just three days later, Rich Kelly, the Marshals Service's associate director for operations and the agency's third-in-command, authorized waivers granting the bodyguards exceptions to the standard eligibility requirements.

Kelly, a career official, retired in September and declined to comment on the decision. The documents indicate the deputation was officially granted in the second week of February 2025 and was scheduled to remain in effect for two years.

It remains unclear whether the Marshals Service has since ended the special deputation status — or if Musk's bodyguards still retain federal law enforcement credentials they were never qualified to hold.

Trump is trapped in an 'ugly place politically' after only 14 months: expert

During an appearance on MS NOW on Monday morning, longtime political analyst John Heilemann pointed out that Donald Trump's approval numbers during his second term have been in a freefall with no hope for a turnaround in sight.

Speaking with the hosts of “Morning Joe,” Heilemann was unable to come up with one time when the embattled president saw any enduring upward swing in his polling.

Keep reading... Show less

Trump's latest ceasefire claim implodes as Iran snubs White House

President Donald Trump’s efforts to bring about a temporary pause to the U.S.-Israeli war against Iran were harshly rebuked Monday by a top Iranian official, and in spite of the president’s recent claim that Iran has “asked the United States for a ceasefire.”

Al Jazeera reported Monday that Iran had outright rejected the Trump administration’s 15-point ceasefire plan, with Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei calling the plan “illogical.” He also vowed that Iran would continue to defend itself against U.S.-Israeli attacks with “all its might.”

Keep reading... Show less

Trump just handed California Dems an overnight gift with surprise endorsement: report

Donald Trump has done the one thing California Republicans begged him not to do — and in doing so, may have handed the governor's race to Democrats, Politico is reporting.

Late Sunday night, Trump endorsed Fox News personality Steve Hilton for California governor on Truth Social, potentially delivering a fatal blow to GOP rival Chad Bianco's campaign and demolishing Republican hopes of keeping Democrats out of the runoff.

"I have known and respected Steve Hilton, who is running for Governor of California, for many years. He is a truly fine man, one who has watched as this once great State has gone to Hell," Trump wrote, before attacking Gov. Gavin Newsom. "Steve can turn it around, before it is too late, and, as President, I will help him to do so!"

The endorsement represents a stunning act of political self-sabotage. California Republicans had explicitly argued that their narrow path to the governor's mansion depended on Trump staying completely out of the race.

The strategy was simple: in California's "jungle primary," a large Democratic field would split the vote, potentially allowing two Republicans — Hilton and Bianco, the Riverside County sheriff — to evenly divide GOP support and advance to the runoff while locking out Democrats.

Trump's endorsement destroys that calculus entirely. By boosting Hilton, he makes it far less likely that both Republicans can split the vote evenly and keep Democrats out of the general election.

The political damage extends beyond the primary dynamics. Political data expert Rob Pyers of California Target Book explained the cascading consequences: "Trump's endorsement of Steve Hilton likely frees up tens of millions of dollars for Democratic groups who would have otherwise had to spend heavily to elevate one of the two leading GOP gubernatorial candidates to avoid a Democratic lockout."

In other words, Democrats no longer need to spend their own resources boosting a Republican to prevent an all-Democratic general election. Trump's endorsement accomplished that for them.

The irony is especially acute because Hilton himself had been trying to avoid exactly this scenario. In a state where Democrats vastly outnumber Republicans and Trump is widely despised, Hilton sought to keep the race focused on California issues.

"The media obsession and the California Democrats' obsession with Trump doesn't do our state any favors. We have to focus on California issues, and that's what I'm doing," Hilton said last week.

Trump hands GOP 'political mess' – and some Republicans nearing 'breaking point': report

President Donald Trump’s shifting messaging around the U.S. war against Iran has grown increasingly “difficult” to understand, Punchbowl News reported Monday in its morning newsletter, and to such a degree that it’s pushed some Republicans near a “breaking point.”

“Tracking and understanding Trump right now is very difficult, especially on the Iran war,” Punchbowl News’ report reads. “It’s like trying to nail Jell-O to a wall. He’s all over the place on every issue – domestic policy, international affairs and Iran specifically – presenting Republicans with a political mess.”

Keep reading... Show less

Pentagon gripped by 'climate of fear' with more officer firings on tap during war: expert

Building upon her report from last week about Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s purge of the military leadership at the Pentagon, which included Army Chief of Staff General Randy George, The Atlantic’s Nancy Youssef claimed the military leadership is walking on eggshells, hoping they survive the Donald Trump appointee’s wrath.

Appearing on MS NOW’s “Way too Early” with fill-in host Jackie Alemany, Youssef claimed there are growing concerns that no one can offer their true opinion about the controversial war in Iran, which has become increasingly dangerous for the troops on the ground.

Keep reading... Show less

Jim Jordan catches heat from GOP colleagues who say he 'sold out'

Once described by a Republican colleague as MAGA’s “legislative terrorist,” Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) has uncharacteristically “remained on the sidelines” since President Donald Trump retook the White House, fueling speculation that his quieter approach reflects a bid for party leadership, while also drawing criticism from within the GOP for abandoning his principles.

Jordan last made a bid for House speaker after Rep. Kevin McCarthy’s ousting as speaker in 2023, but was unsuccessful and ultimately lost out to House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA). Since January of last year, Jordan has “taken a much lower-key approach to internal House politics,” Politico reported on Monday, a change that was “on display” during the congressional squabble over Department of Homeland Security (DHS) funding.

Keep reading... Show less

GOP lawmakers put Trump on notice as new war demand nears

Donald Trump's pending request for an additional $200 billion to fund his Iran war is hitting an immediate wall — not just from Democrats, but from his own party's fiscal conservatives who are demanding answers the administration refuses to provide.

According to MS NOW's Jack Fitzpatrick and Kevin Frey, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's hint at the massive funding request has already triggered bipartisan skepticism. Lawmakers from both parties are asking uncomfortable questions about the war's financial cost, human toll, and political risk.

Even Republican loyalists — typically rubber-stamp votes for Trump — are demanding transparency. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) has already signaled opposition to fast-tracking military funding, instead focusing an upcoming reconciliation bill narrowly on DHS funding.

Republican frustration is mounting over the lack of details. Conservatives want spending cuts elsewhere to offset the massive bill, but they can't identify specific programs to cut — a major red flag about the proposal's viability.

Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) made the political reality clear: "If our troops need more money, I want to give it to them, but I want to see the details. You gotta show me the candy before I'll get in that car."

The administration's pitch to allies on Capitol Hill claimed the Iran operation would last "weeks, not months" with no U.S. ground troops. But the massive funding request undermines that narrative entirely.

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) did the math publicly: "If it's been about a billion dollars a day and they want 200 billion, my quick math says they think it'll go on at least six months."

"It begs the question, how long do they expect the war to go on?" Massie added.

Democratic opposition adds another layer of difficulty. Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-Texas) demanded the administration provide specifics before he'd vote for additional funding.

"Before considering any new package, the administration would need to clearly outline the mission, strategy, and use of existing resources," Cuellar said in a statement.

But the fiercest opposition comes from Republican fiscal hawks unafraid to challenge Trump. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) flatly stated he opposes the war and won't support funding legislation.

"They're talking about $200 billion for the military, another $25 billion for farm subsidies, and another $25 billion for disasters," Paul told reporters. "So they're talking about an enormous bill. And I think the biggest threat to our national security is not Iran; I think it's our national debt."

Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) echoed the fiscal conservative demand: "I want everything paid for. I want everything — I think everything up here has to be paid for."

Expert issues stark warning after JD Vance reveals Trump admin's 'mindset' for midterms

A voting-rights expert issued a stark warning during a podcast interview on Sunday as Vice President JD Vance prepares to travel to Hungary this week.

Fox News reported that Vance plans to visit Budapest from April 7 to 8, where he will meet with dictator Viktor Orban and deliver remarks about the "rich partnership" between Hungary and the U.S. ahead of the upcoming national elections. Marc Elias, a lawyer and founder of Elias Law Group, said on a new episode of the "Democracy Watch" podcast with progressive YouTuber Brian Tyler Cohen that Vance's upcoming trip to Hungary revealed the Trump administration's "mindset" ahead of the November midterms.

Keep reading... Show less

Fatal police violence may have declined for the first time in years

For the first time in years, there are early signs that police killings in the United States may be declining — after deaths reached a record high in 2024 and amid intensified scrutiny of law enforcement tactics nationwide.

The findings come as photos and videos of aggressive law enforcement — particularly involving federal immigration agents — have dominated headlines and social media. The new numbers don’t include deaths during immigration enforcement, and federal agents operate under different authorities and standards than state and local police. Nevertheless, some experts say the heightened visibility has sharpened public attention on the use of force.

Keep reading... Show less