The Safer Texas Campaign is offering $10,000 to anyone in Texas who can prove that three statements claiming marijuana is safer than alcohol are incorrect.
The three statements are:
1. Alcohol is significantly more toxic than marijuana, making death by overdose far more likely with alcohol
2. The health effects from long-term alcohol consumption cause tens of thousands of more deaths in the U.S. annually than the health effects from the long-term consumption of marijuana
3. Violent crime committed by individuals intoxicated by alcohol is far more prevalent in the U.S. than violent crime committed by individuals intoxicated by marijuana only.
“We are confident that this $10,000 will not be claimed,” said Safer Texas Campaign manager Craig Johnson, when he posed the challenge.
The challenge echoes the theme of a book recently published by marijuana policy reformers, entitled Marijuana is Safer: So Why Are We Driving People to Drink?.
The book was authored by Steve Fox of the Marijuana Policy Project, Paul Armentano of NORML, and Mason Tvert of Safer Alternative For Enjoyable Recreation.
In an excerpt from their book published on AlterNet, they write that “researchers estimate that every year approximately 600,000 students between the ages of 18 and 24 are unintentionally injured while under the influence of alcohol.”
“Of course, those who drink are not the only ones adversely affected. Even more disturbing is the number of injuries to others that are caused by students under the influence of alcohol. Each year approximately 700,000 students between the ages of 18 and 24 are assaulted by students who have been drinking.”
Noting that many universities have begun trying to educate their students to consume alcohol responsibly, Fox, Armentano, and Tvert question why it is “not appropriate to suggest that they should ‘party responsibly’ with a less harmful substance like marijuana instead?”
Unlike alcohol, they say, marijuana is not associated with assault or rape.
“Every objective study on alcohol and marijuana has shown marijuana is a much safer substance than alcohol to both the user and to society,” the Safer Texas Campaign writes in a statement.
The challenge proposed by the Safer Texas Campaign comes during growing debate over marijuana legalization in California. If passed by a statewide ballot, Proposition 19 would legalize recreational use of marijuana.
Some opponents of marijuana legalization claim it would have adverse affects on businesses because it would prevent employers from using the result of a marijuana drug test to screen out job candidates.
“It creates a whole new protected class of employees and ties employers’ hands in maintaining a drug and alcohol-free workplace,” Erika Frank, general counsel for the California Chamber of Commerce, told MarketWatch.
“It’s uncharted territory,” she said. “There are a lot of ambiguities the initiative creates that unfortunately won’t be resolved until employers are sued.”
“If our elected officials can take millions of dollars from the alcohol industry, and make it easier for alcohol distributors to sell alcohol in cities, they simply do not have the credibility to continue marijuana prohibition and punishing adults for making the safer, rational choice of using marijuana instead of alcohol,” said Johnson.
Proposition 19 faces an uphill battle, despite the fact that its proponents just received a $1 million gift from billionaire George Soros. According to a CNN poll released on Wednesday, 53% of likely voters oppose Prop 19 while 45% support it.
Corey Lewandowski: Who cares if Trump asked me to obstruct justice — I went to the beach instead
Following his hours-long hostile back-and-forth with the House Judiciary Committee, President Donald Trump's former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski appeared on Fox News to downplay the most serious revelation from the testimony — his confirmation of former special counsel Robert Mueller's report that the president ordered him to tell former Attorney General Jeff Sessions to shut down the Russia investigation.
This fact increases the evidence that Trump obstructed justice — but as far as Lewandowski was concerned, it was no big deal, and he explained why to Fox anchor Martha MacCallum.
WATCH: Corey Lewandowski goes down in flames when faced with his own lies
Much to the chagrin of the Republicans on the Judiciary Committee, Democrats allowed staff to ask questions of Corey Lewandowski. Republicans had done the same thing during the questioning of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford when she testified during the Senate hearing for then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh.
When faced with his own words, Lewandowski was forced to admit that he lies on television constantly. Committee staffer Barry Berke showed clips of Lewandowski on cable news shows saying that there was nothing he was afraid of talking about because he knows he never did anything wrong. He told hosts that he had no intention of declaring his Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination. Yet, when faced with questions about
‘Really, really damaging’: CNN legal analyst breaks down how the Lewandowski hearing was a disaster for Trump
President Donald Trump, by all accounts, loved his former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski's performance in the House Judiciary Committee testimony on Russia and obstruction of justice — as did many of the grandstanding Republicans at the hearing like ranking member Doug Collins (R-GA).
But as Lawfare Institute general counsel and CNN legal analyst Susan Hennessey stated on "The Situation Room," the hearing was actually incredibly damning to the president.
"Lewandowski was performing for the president," said political analyst Gloria Borger. "He was performing for Republicans in the state of New Hampshire. If he decides to run for the Senate. And Republicans did get an opportunity today ... to sort of shove it back to the Democrats and say, look, you guys, Barack Obama knew about the Russian meddling, why didn't you tell us."