Quantcast
Connect with us

Navy Secretary Mabus pushes Pentagon to feed soldiers more Gulf seafood

Published

on

Navy Secretary Ray Mabus wants the Pentagon to buy as much Gulf seafood as possible to help the region’s seafood industry recover from the damage of BP’s oil spill.

Secretary Mabus reportedly told the Defense Commissary Agency, which operates a worldwide chain of 284 commissaries to provide groceries to military personnel, “that we should be buying Gulf Coast seafood,” according to The New Orleans Times-Picayune.

ADVERTISEMENT

“He expressed what we wanted to hear; he is in favor of the federal government buying seafood from the Gulf,” Ewell Smith, executive director of the Louisiana Seafood Promotion and Marketing Board, said.

Although the federal government has claimed that seafood from the Gulf of Mexico is safe to eat, experts told Raw Story they had serious concerns about the long-term effects of consuming Gulf seafood.

Multiple independent lab tests have found high volumes of crude oil and other harmful hydrocarbons in Gulf shrimp.

“I wouldn’t eat shrimp, fish or crab caught in the Gulf,” said Robert M. Naman, a chemist at ACT Labs in Mobile, Alabama, conducted a test on Gulf seafood after being contacted by a New Orleans activist. “The problems people will face, health-wise, are something that people don’t understand.”

Direct exposure to crude oil can cause a number of short-lived health issues, but the effects of regular consumption of small amounts of crude oil is still being debated by the medical community.

ADVERTISEMENT

Crude oil contains benzene, which can cause cancer, along with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) and heavy metals such as lead, mercury and cadmium, which are toxic to the brain and nervous system.

“Once oil enters, it can damage every organ, every system in the body,” Dr. Susan Shaw, a marine toxicologist at the Marine Environmental Research Institute, said. “There is no safe level of exposure to this oil, because it contains carcinogens, mutagens that can damage DNA and cause cancer and other chronic health problems. Many people in the Gulf have been exposed for months — not just workers but residents. There are hundreds of health complaints from local people with symptoms that resemble symptoms of oil exposure.

“It will be years, possibly decades, before we understand the extent and nature of the health effects caused by this spill,” she added.

ADVERTISEMENT

In addition, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and FDA officials told Raw Story that fish and shellfish being tested for possible contaminates are not being tested for heavy metals. The government has also been withholding key data on Gulf seafood testing from scientists seeking an independent evaluation.

Although most seafood already contains small amounts of heavy metals, scientists and public health experts worry that increased levels could lead to mental health problems and increased rates of cancer.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We know that heavy metals are linked to the development of cancer over the course of time,” Edward Trapido, the Wendell Gauthier Chair of Cancer Epidemiology at the Louisiana State University School of Public Health, said. “So if there is no testing, then that’s a problem for sure.”

Dock owners have asked fishermen to sign waivers that put the full responsibility for toxins found in the catch on the fishermen themselves, Louisiana fishermen’s activist Kindra Arnesen.

The Louisiana marketing board marketing board is reportedly receiving $30 million from BP to promote Gulf seafood.

ADVERTISEMENT

On December 1, the White House again claimed Gulf seafood was not harmful to consume, writing on its blog that “we at the White House are so happy to play our part in reminding Americans that Gulf seafood is not only safe – but delicious.”

Roughly 40 to 50 percent of fishers in the Gulf of Mexico have returned to their job, according to the Times-Picayune.

With additional reporting by Stephen C. Webster and Brad Jacobson.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

BUSTED: Utah Republican took at least $135,000 in illegal campaign donations

Published

on

On Tuesday, The New York Times reported that Burgess Owens, a former football player and Fox News commentator running for Congress in Utah, accepted at least $135,000 in illegal campaign contributions.

"Mr. Owens ... reported bringing in a staggering $2.5 million during the third quarter fund-raising period, one of the biggest hauls for a Republican congressional candidate. But a review of his campaign’s financial disclosures showed that at least $135,500 — about 40 percent of the cash his campaign currently has on hand in the final stretch — was ineligible because the donors had contributed more than the legal limit," reported Catie Edmondson. "Individuals may donate up to $2,800 to a federal candidate per election, according to limits published by the Federal Election Commission."

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Kris Kobach asks for allegedly fraudulent Bannon wall funds to be ‘unfrozen’ so he can get paid for his work promoting it

Published

on

On Tuesday, Law & Crime reported that former Kansas Secretary of State and longtime Trump ally Kris Kobach was rebuffed by federal prosecutors for trying to "inject" himself into the fraud case against former Trump campaign chairman and adviser Steve Bannon.

"Kobach ... is apparently looking to unfreeze We Build the Wall funds so he can get paid for the work he did," reported Matt Naham. "Kobach has attempted to do this [by] challenging a restraining order that 'intended to safeguard funds that will be subject to forfeiture following a conviction in this case[…].'"

Continue Reading
 

2020 Election

NYT bombshell reveals banks forgave $287 million in debt Trump failed to repay – and he never paid taxes on it

Published

on

Over the past decade banks have forgiven about $287 million in loans from Donald Trump, after he failed to repay the debts. Not only did Trump benefit from banks approach to his failing businesses, a New York Times bombshell report reveals, but it appears the President failed to pay taxes on the forgiven loans, which the IRS sees as income.

"Big banks and hedge funds gave him years of extra time to repay his debts," the Times reports. "Even after Mr. Trump sued his largest lender, accusing it of preying on him, the bank agreed to lend him another $99 million — more than twice as much as was previously known — so that he could pay back what he still owed the bank on the defaulted Chicago loan, records show."

Continue Reading
 
 
Democracy is in peril. Invest in progressive news. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free. LEARN MORE