Quantcast
Connect with us

George Will: Sarah Palin ‘cannot be elected president’

Published

on

Conservative columnist George Will doesn’t have much faith in Sarah Palin.

The former Alaska governor “cannot be elected president,” he declared Sunday.

ABC’s This Week invited a round table of pundits to start the year by speculating which Republicans had a chance at being elected president.

“Who do you like?” ABC’s Jake Tapper asked Will.

ADVERTISEMENT

“How many people remember that Huckabee got more delegates than Romney got?” Will wondered. “Huckabee won Iowa.”

“I believe the [President Barack Obama’s] secret weapon may be the Republican nominating electorate because there is one person high in the polls, Sarah Palin, who cannot be elected because she cannot compete where elections are decided in the collar counties around Chicago, Montgomery County outside Philadelphia — just can’t compete there,” he said.

A CNN poll released last week indicated that Palin may be losing her base. Only 49 percent of Republicans would support the former governor’s presidential bid, an 18 point drop since December 2008.

“The person that wins the White House usually wins a majority of the electoral votes in the Mississippi Valley. To me, that says [Minnesota Gov. Tim] Pawlenty, [Sen. John] Thune, [Indiana Gov.] Mitch Daniels certainly,” Will said.

Democratic strategist Donna Brazile agreed that Daniels was the person she would least like to see with the GOP nomination.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think he’s an interesting candidate,” she said. “I think he would make a strong Republican nominee, but I don’t think he can beat President Obama.”

“I do like Daniels and I think that Americans often vote for the opposite of what disappointed them,” Will added. “If they’re disappointed with Mr. Obama, then a short, balding, unimpressive, uncharismatic, competent governor may be just the thing.”

“Bring it on,” Brazile said.

ADVERTISEMENT

This video is from ABC’s This Week, broadcast Jan. 2, 2010.

ADVERTISEMENT

Watch this video on iPhone/iPad


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

2020 Election

William Barr made it clear this week that he’d sign off on a sham investigation into the Dems’ 2020 nominee

Published

on

Welcome to another edition of What Fresh Hell?, Raw Story’s roundup of news items that might have become controversies under another regime, but got buried – or were at least under-appreciated – due to the daily firehose of political pratfalls, unhinged tweet storms and other sundry embarrassments coming out of the current White House.

A perfect storm propelled New York's sleaziest real estate developer to an Electoral College victory in 2016 despite winning three million fewer votes than his opponent, but Nate Silver made a compelling argument that the letter James Comey sent to Congress just 11 days before Election Day announcing that the FBI was re-opening its probe into Hillary Clinton's emails was decisive.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Bill Barr is serving notice to DOJ officials that he’ll ruin them if they investigate Trump: MSNBC host

Published

on

An MSNBC discussion about Bill Barr running interference within the Justice Department for Donald Trump ended with "AM Joy" host Joy Reid suggesting that the attorney general's very public "media blitz" over the so-called "Horowitz Report" is a warning shot to anyone in the DOJ who thinks about investigating the president.

As Reid explained it, "He did a whole TV blitz to basically say that his own agency, the FBI, was spying on the Trump campaign, something that the inspector general said did not happen."

Reid took that to its logical conclusion.

"Now he’s saying, ‘Well, I’ve got a different report that’s going to find the motivations’ that he’s basically saying are bad motivations by people in the FBI.  And if you’re that FBI agent and then you hear that Donald Trump may be again looking for foreign help and maybe again getting help from Russia or forcing help from Ukraine, what do you do?" she asked. "Would you then not be concerned that, should you go ahead and investigate foreign interference in our election, that William Barr may come after you?"

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Stefanik voters turning on GOP lawmaker after she threw away her credibility to defend Trump

Published

on

Over the course of the impeachment hearings, Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) has gone from a relative backbencher who sells herself as a moderate to voters in Upstate New York, to a theatrical partisan grandstanding for President Donald Trump and a top target of ire from Democrats.

But according to Politico, at least some of her voters appear turned off by her new stance.

"While Stefanik once able to strike a delicate balance between her Republican identity and her positions on issues like climate change, some think those earlier convictions are gone, like Phillip Paige, a former Stefanik backer and a member of SUNY Potsdam’s College Republicans," wrote Politico's Anna Gronewald. "A native of the 21st district’s Madrid, New York, Paige said he started to lose faith in Stefanik when she began supporting Trump as the party’s nominee in 2016. Paige supported John Kasich’s candidacy in that election. 'A lot of her boots-on-the-ground young Republican crowd has really become quite disillusioned,' he said. 'We saw her as what we thought the future of the Republican Party was and that really has been disproven. Unless, maybe the future of the Republican party is Donald Trump.'"

Continue Reading