Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN) urged CNN’s Candy Crowley Sunday not to mention Fox News’ Sarah Palin in connection with the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ).
In a Sunday interview, Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) noted that public figures have used violent rhetoric against Giffords, something Palin has done.
“Those of us in public life and the journalists who cover this should be thoughtful in response to this and try to bring down the rhetoric, which I’m afraid has become pervasive in the discussion of political issues,” he said.
“The phrase ‘don’t retreat, reload,’ putting crosshairs on congressional districts as targets, these sort of things, I think, invite the kind of toxic rhetoric that can lead unstable people to believe this is an acceptable response,” Durbin added.
The Illinois senator was referring to a post on Sarah Palin’s Facebook page that placed crosshairs over Giffords’ congressional district. Palin said supporters should “reload” and use their votes to “aim for” the Democrat’s defeat.
“You talk about putting those that you want to defeat in the crosshairs graphically on the Internet, you’re talking about Sarah Palin here,” Crowley observed. “I guess that the undertow — and certainly it’s not an undertow on the internet — but the undertow with politicians now speaking publicly is, ‘Well, the Republicans and tea party and Sarah Palin have gone way too far in their rhetoric. It’s been violent rhetoric and therefore this sort of thing happens.’ Are you making that direct connection?”
“I don’t think you can ever make that direct connection,” Durbin explained. “But don’t we have an obligation, those of news public life and those who cover us, to say this is beyond the bounds? It may be constitutionally permissible, but it shouldn’t be acceptable rhetoric. We shouldn’t invite it on the radio talk shows or the TV, at least without comment. We ought to say that goes too far.”
Crowley turned to Alexander for his view.
“Is it over the line politically these days, given the kind of climate we’re in, to be talking about or graphically showing a politician in the crosshairs or talking about taking them out? Was it over the line, sort of specifically, since it’s now being talked about everywhere, Sarah Palin’s web ads for people she would like to see targeted for political defeat?” she asked.
“Well, Candy, I think you’re responsible, by bringing this up, of doing the very thing you’re trying to condemn,” Alexander shot back. “You’re making and implying a direct connection between Sarah Palin and what happened.”
“I think the way to get away from it is for you not to be talking about it,” he added.
Apparently Fox News agrees with the senator from Tennessee because when Palin’s name was mentioned at a vigil for Giffords, they cut the video feed.
Palin offered her “sincere condolences” on her Facebook page Saturday.
“We never ever, ever intended it to be gun sights,” Palin aide Rebecca Mansour told conservative talk show host Tammy Bruce.
Mansour agreed with Bruce’s suggestion that the crosshairs were simply representing a “surveyor’s symbol.”
This video is from CNN’s State of the Union, broadcast Jan. 9, 2010.
‘Angry’ Trump Michigan voters admit they want ‘this nightmare to end’ in November
President Donald Trump's Michigan supporters are abandoning their 2016 pick for Vice President Joe Biden as the election comes closer.
In a series of interviews on MSNBC Sunday, revisited voters they'd met earlier in the election cycle in Kent County.
Katey Morse and her husband were both working full time, and their kids were in school back in March, but things quickly changed as the coronavirus spread throughout the country. Luckily, she and her husband didn't lose their jobs, but they, like many parents, are struggling to do virtual school for their kids.
"I'm turning into more of an angry person than I've ever been in my life," she said about how she feels politically, noting that it makes her sad. "I've just got a countdown to November now, and I'm hoping we'll wake up from this nightmare we're in."
Trump abusing the intelligence community in an attempt to keep them quiet about Russia election hacks: Conservative
The New York Times Magazine piece outlining President Donald Trump's battles with the U.S. intelligence community revealed that Russia is continuing to wage its own cyberwar against the world. According to conservative Washington Post columnist Max Boot, the devastating report explained the extent to which the president is ignoring the threats to the 2020 election.
“The options faced by the intelligence community during Trump’s presidency have been stark: avoid infuriating the president but compromise the agencies’ ostensible independence, or assert that independence and find yourself replaced with a more sycophantic alternative," wrote Robert Draper in his lengthy investigation into Trump's efforts to politicize international intelligence. According to Boot, the most shocking part of the investigation was that the experts in the intelligence community have been banned from speaking honestly about the Russian attacks.
‘Incompetent moron’ Chuck Todd ripped for letting Trump official claim Democrats want more COVID-19 deaths
"Meet the Press" host Chuck Todd is under fire -- once again -- after letting Donald Trump's trade adviser Peter Navarro claim on NBC that Democrats want more Americans to die during the coronavirus pandemic to boost their chances at the polls in November.
Instead of pushing back the NBC host known for his lack of follow-up questions let the comment slide by responding, "I take your point."
Todd's failure to call out the Trump aide for what one Twitter commenter called a "disgusting" comment led to an avalanche of criticism for the MBC political director who recently saw his weekday show cut back to make room for more commentary by colleague Nicolle Wallace.