Quantcast
Connect with us

Sundance film shows corporate influence on justice

Published

on

PARK CITY, Utah — A former lawyer has thrown a spotlight on the cash-fueled influence which big business has on America’s judicial system, in a revealing film unveiled at the Sundance film festival.

“Hot Coffee” is named after the infamous case where fast-food giant McDonalds was forced to pay 2.8 million dollars to a woman who burnt herself with one of its drinks.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the documentary Susan Saladoff, a lawyer of 25 years’ standing, explains how America’s corporate giants got their act together after the 1994 McDonald’s case, pushing for laws to restrict consumers’ right to sue them.

On the pretext of limiting so-called “justice jackpot” or “legal lottery” payouts, corporate bosses want consumers “to give up their rights to the court system, voluntarily, so the corporations can make more money,” said Saladoff.

With multi-million dollar campaigns, major business groups have managed to get ceilings fixed in several states on the level of damages if a company is convicted, taking away juries’ traditional right to set compensation.

But Saladoff shows how business influence on the judicial system works in a number of other ways, including “mandatory arbitration” clauses which are notably inserted in cell phone or credit card contracts.

ADVERTISEMENT

Under such clauses the customer waives the right to take legal action, instead agreeing to out-of-court arbitration.

“Most people never think anything bad can happen. When they sign a contract with a company, they don’t think ‘Oh, at some point in the future, I’m gonna have a problem with that company’.

“You think it’s just fine and you sign. And when something does happen, you’ve given up your rights, and it’s not fair when the corporation …that you’re suing gets to pick who makes the decision about who wins or loses.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Moreover “there’s no right to appeal, it’s completely secretive. When it happens, you feel like you’re helpless,” she added.

Even more worrying, in a country where judges are elected by voters in most states, firms can spend fortunes to back judges they think will favor them in case of legal action, or to ruin the career of ones considered too impartial.

“It’s dangerous because (despite) the amounts of money that have been spent, people don’t know where they are coming from.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Those front groups that fundraise, people think, because of their names, that they are citizens’ groups. They don’t know that they are front groups for corporations trying to elect or defeat a judge. It’s a very scary process.”

Her film gives a voice to a number of victims of the system, and ends with an appeal for Americans to do something about it.

“As we know, politicians are also influenced by money. And who give them the money for their elections? Large corporations! The only way anything changes is if we, as people, as individuals, do something.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We can call Congress, we can write letters, we can say No, we can vote. The other thing we have to do is stop signing contracts with mandatory arbitration!” she said.

A law which could set limits on mandatory arbitration is currently being debated by US lawmakers.

“There is a legislation that has been proposed, called the Arbitration Fairness Act. (But) I don’t know now with our Republican congress, whether or not that will go anywhere.

“If we as people, stand up for ourselves and actually recognize that we have rights and fight for them, maybe something can change. But it has to come from us.”

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Ex-prosecutor demands congressional investigation after latest report on the FBI and Brett Kavanaugh

Published

on

Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh had another allegation of sexual misconduct revealed on Saturday in a bombshell report in The New York Times.

"A classmate, Max Stier, saw Mr. Kavanaugh with his pants down at a different drunken dorm party, where friends pushed his penis into the hand of a female student. Mr. Stier, who runs a nonprofit organization in Washington, notified senators and the F.B.I. about this account, but the F.B.I. did not investigate and Mr. Stier has declined to discuss it publicly," the newspaper reported.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Boris Johnson promises Britain will be like the Incredible Hulk during Brexit negotiations

Published

on

Prime Minister Boris Johnson said Saturday he was making a "huge amount of progress" towards a Brexit deal with the EU, in an interview in which he compared Britain to the Incredible Hulk.

"It's going to take a lot of work between now and October 17" when EU leaders gather for their final summit before Britain's scheduled exit from the bloc, he told the Mail on Sunday newspaper.

"But I'm going to go to that summit and I'm going to get a deal, I'm very confident. And if we don't get a deal then we'll come out on October 31."

His comments came ahead of talks with European Commission chief Jean-Claude Juncker and the EU's chief Brexit negotiator, Michel Barnier, in Luxembourg on Monday.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

NYT blasted for ‘spectacularly offensive sentiment’ after tweet illustrating ‘rape culture’

Published

on

The results of a 10-month investigation into Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh by New York Times reporters Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was published on Saturday.

But attention was taken away from the powerful reporting after the Twitter account of The Times opinion page posted a shocking message.

"Having a penis thrust in your face at a drunken dorm party may seem like harmless fun," read the tweet.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free.
close-image