Panel casts doubt on FBI scientific evidence in anthrax case
An independent panel of scientists has determined that the FBI did not have enough scientific evidence to produce a conviction in the case of the 2001 anthrax attacks that killed five people.
The National Academies of Sciences released a review Tuesday of the science used in the investigation. The $1.1 million report, which was commissioned by the FBI, concluded that the man accused in the case, Bruce Ivins, could have carried out the attacks, but the science alone did not prove it.
In October and September of 2001, letters containing anthrax killed five people and infected 17 others. Recipients included NBC News, The New York Post, Sen. Tom Daschle (D-SD) and Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT).
Even after over 600,000 investigator work hours spent by the FBI’s “Amerithrax Task Force,” the case against Ivins was largely circumstantial.
Ivins killed himself in 2008 just as the government was prepared to indict him. The Justice Department closed the case last year, concluding Ivins had acted alone in stealing the spores from the government lab where he worked.
The report released Tuesday questioned the link between a flask of anthrax found in Ivins’ office and the letters.
“The scientific link between the letter material and flask number RMR-1029 is not as conclusive as stated in the DOJ Investigative Summary,” the report said.
The panel added that another explanation for the link “was not rigorously explored” by the FBI.
“This shows what we’ve been saying all along: that it was all supposition based on conjecture based on guesswork, without any proof whatsoever,” Paul Kemp, a lawyer who represented Ivins, told The Washington Post.
“The FBI has long maintained that while science played a significant role, it was the totality of the investigative process that determined the outcome of the anthrax case,” the Justice Department and the FBI said in a joint statement. “Although there have been great strides in forensic science over the years, rarely does science alone solve an investigation.”
In a September 2007 e-mail to himself, Ivins said he knew of the identity of the anthrax killer. Before his death in 2008, he told friends that government agents had hounded him and his family. These details have given rise to a wide variety of conspiracy theories about the case ever since.
Breaking Banner
Trump officials plot bypassing Congress to deliver another tax cut to the ultra-rich: report
Trump White House officials have reportedly figured out a new way to give wealthy Republican donors a big tax cut ahead of the 2020 election -- and they won't even need Congress to approve it.
Bloomberg reports that Trump officials are plotting a new executive order that would result in a cut to the capital gains tax, which largely benefits wealthy investors.
The cut would come in the form of indexing capital gains to inflation, which Bloomberg writes would "slash tax bills for investors when selling assets such as stock or real estate by adjusting the original purchase price so no tax is paid on appreciation tied to inflation."
2020 Election
Trump gets viciously ridiculed for demanding census be postponed after Supreme Court loss: ‘No do overs’
President Donald Trump launched a major Twitter tirade on Thursday afternoon because the Supreme Court ruled against his administration's move to make a question about citizenship status part of the 2020 census.
Tweeting from Japan where he is participating on the G-20 Summit, the president snarled, "Seems totally ridiculous that our government, and indeed Country, cannot ask a basic question of Citizenship in a very expensive, detailed and important Census, in this case for 2020. I have asked the lawyers if they can delay the Census, no matter how long, until the United States Supreme Court is given additional information from which it can make a final and decisive decision on this very critical matter. Can anyone really believe that as a great Country, we are not able the ask whether or not someone is a Citizen. Only in America!' in two parts.
2020 Election
Mueller left huge door open for Trump to seek foreign re-election help — and get away with it: law professor
In a column for the New York Times, a Fordham law professor suggested special counsel Robert Mueller needs to take time during his July public testimony to correct an egregious mistake in his report to the Justice Department that is an open invitation for Donald Trump to reach out to foreign governments for re-election assistance.
According to Jed Handelsman Shugerman, the former FBI head made conspicuous "legal errors" and left "loopholes" in his report that need clarification and fixing since they contradict settled law.
‘Unhinged’ Meghan McCain hurls obscenities at The View’s executive producer in front of audience: report
Here are 4 winners and 9 losers from the first 2020 Democratic primary debate
Alabama is prosecuting a pregnant woman for manslaughter for being shot in the stomach — but not her shooter
Trump tweets bizarre graphic showing himself as the leader for over 50,000 years
Charles Blow drops the hammer on ‘sexual predator’ Trump in brutally blunt NYT column
Trump officials plot bypassing Congress to deliver another tax cut to the ultra-rich: report
Democratic candidate John Delaney gets into a heated clash with MSNBC’s Ali Velshi over Medicare for All
Trump gets viciously ridiculed for demanding census be postponed after Supreme Court loss: ‘No do overs’
How Reverse Darwinian selection afflicts Trump’s Washington
Iran warns Trump against ‘illusion’ of short war
Democratic candidate John Delaney gets into a heated clash with MSNBC’s Ali Velshi over Medicare for All
Ocasio-Cortez gives Stephen Colbert her review of the first Democratic primary debate
Trump campaign’s Kayleigh McEnany: Democratic candidates are a ‘homogenous group of socialists’
Meghan McCain schooled by half-asleep Julian Castro in immigration clash on The View
