The 2011 Nobel Peace Prize will be seen as a unifying choice and will be less controversial than last year’s award, the head of the prize committee said Thursday, a day before the announcement.
“I think (this year’s prize) will be well-received all over the world,”Nobel Committee chief Thorbjoern Jagland told Norwegian public broadcaster NRK late Thursday.
At 11:00 am (0900 GMT) Friday, the committee will announce a Peace Prize that is “very powerful… but at the same time very unifying,” he said, adding though that the pick “is not without conflict.”
At the same time, he stressed, the prize would “not create as strong reactions from a single country as it did last year,” when the choice of jailed Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo outraged Beijing.
Nobel observers have long speculated that the Arab Spring uprising, which brought the overthrow of autocratic regimes in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya and rattled those in Syria, Yemen and Bahrain, will colour this year’s prize, with cyber activists from North Africa seen as the front-runners.
Jagland, however, played down that option Thursday, pointing out that “there are many other positive developments in the world that we have looked at.”
“I think it is a little strange that researchers and others have not seen them,” he said, without providing any more hints.
The list of candidates — this year a record 241 names long — is always a closely-kept secret, each year resulting in frenzied speculation up until the last moment.
Other names that have been circulating are Sima Samar, an Afghan doctor and women’s rights activist, and Russian activist Svetlana Gannushkina and her human rights group Memorial.
The European Union, currently in full crisis mode due to the spiralling debt problems in the eurozone, has meanwhile been increasingly mentioned as a possible winner for its role in keeping the peace in most of Europe for more than half a century.
Although Norway is not a member of the EU, Jagland is an outspoken supporter of the bloc.
In an article published by Norwegian daily VG Wednesday, the Nobel Committee chief confided that this year’s prize would “go to something that has been important to me all my life.”
Trump complains at the UN: ‘I would get a Nobel Prize for a lot of things if they gave them out fairly’
Fox legal analyst: Ukraine scandal is ‘far more serious’ than what Mueller dug up on Trump
Fox News legal analyst Andrew Napolitano on Monday told Fox Business host David Asman that President Donald Trump's now-infamous phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is a serious case of corruption that cannot be ignored.
Although Asman tried to make the story about the actions of former Vice President Joe Biden's son, Napolitano said that what Trump has done appears far worse than anything the former vice president did.
"This is the most serious charge against the president, far more serious than what Bob Mueller dug or dragged up against him," Napolitano said. "If there was a quid pro quo -- it does appear as though a quarter of a billion dollars in defensive weaponry was held back for a period of time while these... conversations were going on between the presidents."
Activists unfurl ‘Exxon Knew, Make Them Pay’ banner outside meeting of fossil fuel CEOs steps from UN climate summit
"People are here in front, making it clear—#ExxonKnew about climate impacts and still put profit over people."
A group of climate activists on Monday unfurled a massive banner that read, "ExxonKnew: Make Them Pay" outside a meeting of fossil fuel CEOs and government representatives at the Morgan Library and Museum, just blocks away from the U.N. Climate Summit in New York.
"People are here in front, making it clear—#ExxonKnew about climate impacts and still put profit over people," tweeted 350.org, which organized the protest alongside watchdog group Corporate Accountability.