The Obama administration’s top constitutional lawyer warned the US Supreme Court on Tuesday to tread lightly in a case involving the international treaty banning chemical weapons.;
Tired of ads? Want to support our progressive journalism? Click to learn more.
JOIN FOR $1
Enjoy good journalism?
… then let us make a small request. The COVID crisis has slashed advertising rates, and we need your help. Like you, we here at Raw Story believe in the power of progressive journalism. Raw Story readers power David Cay Johnston’s DCReport, which we've expanded to keep watch in Washington. We’ve exposed billionaire tax evasion and uncovered White House efforts to poison our water. We’ve revealed financial scams that prey on veterans, and legal efforts to harm workers exploited by abusive bosses. And unlike other news outlets, we’ve decided to make our original content free. But we need your support to do what we do.
Raw Story is independent. Unhinged from corporate overlords, we fight to ensure no one is forgotten.
We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Invest with us. Make a one-time contribution to Raw Story Investigates, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click to donate by check.
Value Raw Story?
… then let us make a small request. The COVID crisis has slashed advertising rates, and we need your help. Like you, we believe in the power of progressive journalism — and we’re investing in investigative reporting as other publications give it the ax. Raw Story readers power David Cay Johnston’s DCReport, which we've expanded to keep watch in Washington. We’ve exposed billionaire tax evasion and uncovered White House efforts to poison our water. We’ve revealed financial scams that prey on veterans, and efforts to harm workers exploited by abusive bosses. We need your support to do what we do.
Raw Story is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Invest with us in the future. Make a one-time contribution to Raw Story Investigates, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.
Report typos and corrections to: corrections@rawstory.com.
The return of dogs to the White House may be short-lived after a recent incident.
"The two German Shepherds belonging to President Joe Biden and first lady Jill Biden were returned to the Biden family home in Delaware last week after aggressive behavior at the White House involving Major Biden, two sources with knowledge tell CNN. Major, who was adopted by Biden in November 2018 from a Delaware animal shelter, had what one of the people described as a 'biting incident' with a member of White House security. The exact condition of the victim is unknown, however, the episode was serious enough that the dogs were subsequently moved to Wilmington, Delaware, where they remain," CNN's Kate Bennett reported Monday.
<p>"Major, who is 3 years old, is the younger of the two Biden dogs, and has been known to display agitated behavior on multiple occasions, including jumping, barking, and 'charging' at staff and security, according to the people CNN spoke with about the dog's demeanor at the White House. The older of Biden's German Shepherds, Champ, is approximately 13 and has slowed down physically due to his advanced age," CNN explained.</p><p>Champ and Major were the first White House dogs since Bo and Sunny during the Obama administration as Donald Trump did not have any pets.</p><ul class="ee-ul"></ul>
CONTINUE READING
Show less
Trump files to vote by mail in Florida -- after repeatedly pushing conspiracy theories about the practice
March 08, 2021
The former president who incited a fatal insurrection with his conspiracy theories about election fraud wants to vote by mail from Mar-a-Lago.
"Former President Donald Trump is set to fulfill his civic duty as a private citizen and vote in the town of Palm Beach's municipal election. Despite his false claims about mail voting during the 2020 election cycle, Trump requested a mail ballot on Friday for the third time in his Palm Beach County voter history," The Palm Beach Post reported.
<p>"The request was made nearly a week after the deadline to have a ballot be sent by mail. Mail ballots can be requested through Tuesday but must be picked up in person by the voter or a designee. It is likely that Trump had an associate pick up the ballot in person on his behalf, as he did for the <a href="https://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/20200311/president-trump-requests-absentee-ballot" target="_blank">presidential primary last March</a> and for<a href="https://www.palmbeachpost.com/story/news/politics/county/2020/08/13/floridas-most-famous-mail-in-voter-will-do-it-again-trump-requests-ballot/113181618/" target="_blank"> the August</a> primary," the newspaper reported.</p><p>The newspaper noted that as of noon on Monday, Trump's ballot had not been recorded as being cast.</p><p>"Casting a ballot by mail remains popular as the coronavirus pandemic hits the one-year mark. Palm Beach County elections chief Wendy Sartory Link said that as of Friday, her office issued 126,136 mail ballots, more than one-third of the 349,099 residents who are eligible to vote in the municipal elections," the newspaper reported. "While running for re-election last year, Trump blasted universal vote-by-mail, where elections offices automatically mail ballots to registered voters."</p><p>Trump criticized voting by mail when he cast his ballot in person on October 24th.</p><p>"It was very secure, much more secure than when you send in a ballot," Trump said. "When you send in your ballot, it could never be like that."</p><p>Trump's ballot may be returned until 7 p.m. on Tuesday at the West Palm Beach elections office.</p>
CONTINUE READING
Show less
The needle on the John-Stoehr-O-Meter is reading "annoyed" this morning due to the fact that our political discourse is so upside down, so backwards and so prolapsed I'm compelled to defend someone I don't feel like defending. My annoyance is doubled by knowing that defending him just makes our discourse even more upside down, even more backwards and even more prolapsed (assuming that's even possible). Everything would be better if the narrative of politics were based on facts, not meta-narratives.1
Before I get to that certain someone, let me lay out those facts. The United States Senate passed Saturday a covid relief package worth about $2 trillion.2 It is a giant piece of legislation, in size and scope, akin to the Social Security Act of 1935 in terms of impact on the farthest corners of our society. It is the sixth of six spending bills passed by the United States Congress during the covid era. Compared to the previous five combined, however, it "includes more generous direct payments for low-income Americans," according to the Times' Jim Tankersley. "It is more focused on people than on businesses and expected to help women and minorities in particular."
<p>As much as it is a relief bill, it's an anti-poverty bill. It represents, according to the <em>Times</em>, a bid by Joe Biden and the Democrats to use government to "tackle the pandemic and invigorate the economic recovery by pouring immense amounts of money into initiatives to help low-income and the middle class." In addition to $2,800 per married couple earning less than $150,000 a year,<a href="https://stoehr.substack.com/p/the-american-rescue-act-is-the-bfd#footnote-3" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">3</a> the American Rescue Act extends $300 per week unemployment benefits through Labor Day<a href="https://stoehr.substack.com/p/the-american-rescue-act-is-the-bfd#footnote-4" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">4</a>; it includes $350 billion of states and cities<a href="https://stoehr.substack.com/p/the-american-rescue-act-is-the-bfd#footnote-5" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">5</a>; $12 billion for nutritional assistance (food stamps); $45 billion for housing assistance (including utilities); a provision allowing taxpayers to deduct from tax returns <em>half</em> of their childcare costs; and the makings of permanent cash payments<a href="https://stoehr.substack.com/p/the-american-rescue-act-is-the-bfd#footnote-6" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">6</a> to kids in order to cut childhood poverty over time by nearly half.</p><p>In addition to being a relief bill and anti-poverty bill, the American Rescue Act is a health care bill. For one thing, it would pay for 100 percent of your health insurance costs if you lose your job.<a href="https://stoehr.substack.com/p/the-american-rescue-act-is-the-bfd#footnote-7" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">7</a> For another, it would drop the threshold for eligibility for health insurance subsidies from 400 percent over the poverty line to 150 percent. (In other words, 8.5 percent of your income.) This will be a huge boon for middle-class Americans who have been boxed out of the Affordable Care Act because they make too much to qualify. (I tend to agree with those who called that Barack Obama's "<a href="https://stoehr.substack.com/p/focusing-so-much-on-1400-is-a-mistake" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">big failure.</a>") It moreover puts us on course to realizing Medicare for All without having to go through the trouble of arguing about it. Just drop the ACA threshold to zero.<a href="https://stoehr.substack.com/p/the-american-rescue-act-is-the-bfd#footnote-8" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">8</a></p><p>But even all this does not capture how monumental this bill is. In a real sense, it takes the last four decades of respectable opinion in economic policy and flips them over.<a href="https://stoehr.substack.com/p/the-american-rescue-act-is-the-bfd#footnote-9" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">9</a> Instead of policies starting at the top of society and trickling down, these are policies starting at the bottom and wending their way up. Nearly everything the Republicans and "fiscal hawks" are calling bad, the Democrats are calling good. The stifling fear of inflation among mainstream policymakers, which stymied the Obama administration's response to the panic of 2007-2008, just doesn't exist anymore. "It is as far away as you can get from repressive, supply-side economics," said US Senator Michael Bennett. "This is progressive economics that puts money in the hands of working people who will spend that money." This is, in other words, the beginning of regime change.<a href="https://stoehr.substack.com/p/the-american-rescue-act-is-the-bfd#footnote-10" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">10</a></p><p>Robert Reich has been fighting for regime change since the Reagan administration. Now that it's beginning, however, he can't quite see it. "We're in one of those rare periods when Democrats control the presidency, House, and Senate," the former labor secretary and progressive pundit tweeted. "So there's no reason to compromise on a $15 minimum wage, or $1,400 survival checks, or abolishing the filibuster. Why are we negotiating with ourselves?" The unsaid target here is none other than Joe Manchin, which is to say, that certain someone I feel I must defend, much to my annoyance.</p><p>To Reich and other progressives,<a href="https://stoehr.substack.com/p/the-american-rescue-act-is-the-bfd#footnote-11" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">11</a> the conservative Senate Democrat from West Virginia is the problem. Not because of the facts of the American Rescue Act, which I have outlined and which are monumental on their face. Manchin is the problem because he plays the bad guy in a story Reich and others have been telling since the Reagan administration. The reason we can't have nice things in this country is because some Democrats don't want us to. They're too conservative. Ergo, Joe Manchin is bad.</p><p>To be sure, Manchin voted against raising the minimum wage. But so did a bunch of other Democrats, some quite liberal. He did negotiate to limit who gets stimulus checks, but so what? Those who get them are going to be middle class and lower. That should make Reich happy. Manchin did insist unemployment benefits be $300 instead of $400 a week, but that's just keeping it the same as it was the last five times the Congress went through this process. In the end, Manchin looked like the Rebellious Democrat he bills himself as—while leaving Biden's proposals pretty much intact.</p><p>Reich's narrative of politics isn't based on facts. (He would be celebrating instead of complaining if it were.) His narrative is about narratives, his story is about stories—stories that are no longer relevant to, or increasingly out of step with, the facts.<a href="https://stoehr.substack.com/p/the-american-rescue-act-is-the-bfd#footnote-12" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">12</a> The longer Reich and others tell this story about stories, the more they actually threaten to undermine the public's understanding of this paradigm-shifting new law. Many people now believe the Democrats caved again. In fact, they have begun changing the world.</p>
CONTINUE READING
Show less
Trending
Latest
Videos
Copyright © 2021 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email corrections@rawstory.com.
Thanks for your support!
Did you enjoy Raw Story this year? Join us! We're offering RawStory ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.