Top Stories Daily Listen Now
RawStory

Video

'She put herself second:' Family chokes up on MSNBC after mom snatched by ICE

Immigration officials sparked outrage after they snatched a 64-year-old Iranian woman who has lived in the country for decades while she was gardening at her New Orleans home. Speaking to MSNBC on Friday, the daughter of Madonna “Donna” Kashanian became choked up talking about the kindness and care of her mother.

Kashanian's husband, Russ Milne, told host Nicolle Wallace that she has fought through the system for citizenship for many decades. He said that she entered a previous marriage "at a very young age." It was finally deemed unlawful, and she was able to apply for asylum while attending university on a student visa.

Keep reading... Show less

Jesse Watters could be Fox News’ next legal disaster: ex-federal prosecutor

Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-CA) has the "facts on his side," a former federal prosecutor said about his lawsuit against Fox News.

Speaking to MSNBC's Nicolle Wallace on Friday, legal analyst Harry Litman addressed Newsom's recent lawsuit regarding an episode of Jesse Waters' show that addressed a debate over when Newsom spoke with President Donald Trump about sending the National Guard to Los Angeles.

Keep reading... Show less

Trump warns 'stupid' Fed chair is a 'stubborn mule' making a 'big mistake'

President Donald Trump lashed out at Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell on Friday during a news conference, calling him "stupid" and a "stubborn mule."

The news conference was to announce a peace deal between Rwanda and Congo, two African nations that have been embroiled in a bloody conflict for decades. Trump took questions from reporters following the peace deal's announcement and was asked about whether he wanted Powell to resign from his post.

Keep reading... Show less

‘Don’t ask me a trade question’: Trump scolds reporter during live briefing

During a ceremony Friday celebrating a brokered peace deal between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, President Donald Trump snapped at a reporter who asked him about U.S. trade policies on Canada.

Earlier on Friday, Trump announced that trade negotiations had been halted with Canada, citing Canada’s digital services tax on American tech firms as the primary reason for the fallout. While handing out commemorative coins to Rwanda and Congo leaders, as well as a journalist during the peace deal ceremony, Trump was asked by a reporter, “Why not Canada?”

Keep reading... Show less

'Cringed so hard': Legal expert aghast as Trump holds justices up as trophies

Former federal prosecutor Elie Honig took issue with the dissent written by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson in the case involving nationwide injunctions against executive orders from President Donald Trump.

Honig told a CNN panel that he doesn't think that this is a Democrat vs. Republican issue. President Joe Biden's administration made the same argument in the court that the Trump administration did, he noted.

Keep reading... Show less

'What happened to Thomas Massie?' MAGA super PAC goes after longtime Trump thorn

The Trump-affiliated Kentucky MAGA super PAC has unleashed its first round of attacks on GOP contrarian Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) after the lawmaker vehemently opposed the president's weekend strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities.

President Donald Trump's team was cobbling together the organization in the days before Massie joined with Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) to introduce a war powers resolution to prevent Trump from acting on his own against Iran, Axios reported Sunday. Trump ordered the strikes Saturday, before Congress could consider the resolution.

Keep reading... Show less

'Get to the airport!' Trump's megabill timeline at risk as lawmakers try to flee

President Donald Trump’s "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" may be in trouble.

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) told CNN on Friday that Republican lawmakers are increasingly “nervous” over the potential political fallout from supporting the megabill — and are scurrying to their home states for the weekend.

Keep reading... Show less

Expert warns Supreme Court to say goodbye to vacation: 'About to get inundated'

Slate legal reporter Mark Joseph Stern recalled an era in which the U.S. Supreme Court could take a few months off and have a kind of summer vacation. That is probably over, he cautioned when speaking to MSNBC.

The high court issued a ruling Friday that eliminated nationwide injunctions by courts. It's in the birthright citizenship case before a federal court. While the conservative justices didn't bar birthright citizenship, they made it impossible to put the law on hold while it plays out in the courts.

Keep reading... Show less

‘Brilliantly written?’ CNN reporter drags Trump after eyebrow-raising reversal

CNN Correspondent Kristen Holmes dragged President Donald Trump on Friday on his alleged flip-flop on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who on Friday called a decision of hers “brilliantly written,” despite reportedly complaining about the judge in private for months.

A reporter asked Trump on Friday for his take on criticisms directed at Barrett from his supporters, most of which pertain to several votes of hers dissenting from Trump’s agenda.

Keep reading... Show less

'He's a communist!': Trump lashes out at NYC Democratic winner

President Donald Trump attacked the winner of the New York City mayoral primary race on Tuesday, claiming that he is a "communist."

The young left-wing candidate, Zohran Mamdani, identifies as a democratic socialist, a label that Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) has also adopted.

Keep reading... Show less

Supreme Court just opened the door for the government to grab guns: legal expert

Reacting to the Supreme Court's stunning birthright citizenship ruling that now opens the door to an avalanche of lawsuits because the conservative court failed to rule on the reach of the 14th Amendment, one MSNBC legal analyst said the court may have opened a can of worms.

Speaking with host Ana Cabrera, Danny Cevallos explained that a non-Donald Trump administration could apply Friday's ruling to test the limits of the 2nd Amendment.

Cevallos noted a dissent from Justice Sonia Sotomayor made a solid point about the majority's ruling written by Justice Amy Coney Barrett.

"Sotomayor makes a compelling point that it should factor in," he told the host. "This is a great example of something that the government is so likely to lose on. And one of the other things I thought she raised that I thought was important was think about this going the other way?"

"What if the next president, a Democrat president, for example, says, 'I hereby issue an executive order: we're collecting all the guns. We're collecting them all tomorrow, we're going house to house, and we interpret the Constitution. The Second Amendment is saying, well, we're only talking about militia. And that's, oh, I don't know, the National Guard. Therefore, your AR-15 is now going to be collected by our authorities.'"

"Imagine the same thing," he suggested. "Someone would immediately go to a district court to challenge that as unconstitutional and so now what does this mean that we now need to wait for as the attorney general or Solicitor General John Sauer said, for these cases to percolate up through the system?"

You can watch below or at the link right here.

- YouTube youtu.be

Professor issues chilling prediction about Trump targeting 'every right' we have

University of Michigan Law Professor Barbara McQuade issued a stark warning on MSNBC Friday following the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that delivered a victory to President Donald Trump’s effort to eliminate birthright citizenship, implying that all constitutional rights may now be in danger.

“We are going to have people who are immigrants giving birth to children without knowing what their status is,” McQuade said on MSNBC Reports. “One of the things that is also so important about this opinion is it’s not going to end with birthright citizenship; as Justice (Sonia) Sotomayor writes in her dissent, this means every constitutional right is an issue.”

Keep reading... Show less

'Tempers are high' on Supreme Court after 'jarring' exchange: legal expert

Reacting to reporting that Justice Sonia Sotomayor took 15 minutes to read a scathing dissent with the court's conservative majority's ruling on birthright citizenship, legal analyst Melissa Murray pointed to a change in courtroom demeanor.

"I understand that Justice Sotomayor, still reading her dissent from the bench," MSNBC host Ana Cabrera prompted her guest. "We also have a dissent from Justice [Ketanji Brown] Jackson who writes in her dissent the court's decision to permit the executive to violate the Constitution with respect to anyone who has not yet sued is 'an existential threat to the rule of law.'"

"Melissa, your thoughts on just the emotion that we are seeing triggered in this particular ruling?" she asked .

"Well, it seems very clear, Anna, that tempers are high on both sides, on both Justice Sotomayor and Justice Jackson dissenting; Justice Sotomayor choosing to read her dissent from the bench," Murray replied. "That's not something that always happens; they reserve that for the most forceful dissents in the cases that they think matter the most."

"But she is basically into a 15-minute read here, which is one of the longest public dissents that she has made. So she clearly thinks this is really important, and it is likely that we may see something from Justice Jackson as well," she continued. "And also the cross exchanges between the justices here show that tempers are short on this court. The clip that Julia earlier read from Justice Jackson, from Justice Barrett about Justice Jackson, it's a little short, a little jarring in its tone. It's not typically what you would expect from life tenured colleagues."

"But it seems clear that at least on this issue, there was a lot of disagreement on this court, a lot of disagreement about the impact of the court's decision here, and whether or not this would truly give rise to a failure of rule of law systems," she suggested. "Justice Barrett says that this is only about stopping an imperial judiciary. Justice Jackson saying, no, this is about stopping an imperial executive that is moving very quickly toward something that looks more like autocracy."

You can watch below or at the link here.

- YouTube youtu.be