Top Stories Daily Listen Now
RawStory

Video

'Brain is peanut butter': Trump mocked for calling Japanese leader 'Mr. Japan'

President Donald Trump was brutally mocked over the weekend after he referred to Japan's leader as "Mr. Japan."

The president made the statement during an interview with Fox News host Maria Bartiromo about tariffs. As his July 9 deadline for tariff deals approached, Trump said he would rather send a letter to countries instead of negotiating.

Keep reading... Show less

'He wasn't ready': Fox News trashes Pete Hegseth after presser crashes and burns

Fox News contributor Liz Claman criticized Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth after a question from correspondent Jennifer Griffin "triggered" him at a recent press conference on Iran.

"For Secretary Pete Hegseth, the main target was the media," Fox News host Howard Kurtz said Sunday of last week's statements to the press. "Liz, who do you think those anti-press comments were aimed at? Who was the audience for saying you all hate Trump, and that's why you want to tear them down?"

Keep reading... Show less

'Get back to decency': MTG mocked on Fox News for flipping out on reporter

A panel of Fox News pundits slammed Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) after she hung up on a reporter who asked her questions about her opposition to President Donald Trump's decision to bomb Iran.

On Sunday's Media Buzz program, host Howard Kurtz noted that Greene had recorded a video of herself cursing at the reporter before abruptly ending the call.

Keep reading... Show less

'We're going to pound you at the polls': Dem snaps back at Republican on CNN

A Pennsylvania Democrat fired back at a GOP lawmaker from West Virginia during a CNN "State of the Union" panel discussion on the budget bill winding its way through the Senate.

Host Jake Tapper gave Rep. Riley Moore (R-WV) the first shot at defending the bill that has proved unpopular with voters according to recent polls as the CNN host pointed out to Sen. Katie Britt (R-AL) earlier on the show.

Keep reading... Show less

'Clumsy': Fox News host calls out Trump to his face for botched deportations

Fox News host Maria Bartiromo called out President Donald Trump for "clumsy" deportations that targeted farmers and service workers instead of criminals.

During a Sunday interview, Bartiromo noted that Trump was "backing away" from his harsh deportation policies.

Keep reading... Show less

CNN's Tapper schooled by Dem senator over Trump's Iran attack

CNN host Jake Tapper did not get the answer he expected from Sen. Mark Warner when he pressed the Virginia Democrat over the success of Donald Trump surprise attack on Iran over a week ago.

During his appearance on CNN's 'State of the Union," the chair of the Select Committee on Intelligence was asked by the CNN host, "So we still don't know the degree of the damage, but let me just ask you this as a basic just calling balls and strikes here: isn't the world safer today because of these strikes than it was nine days ago?"

"If we don't end up seeing Iran attacking us through cyber or through proxies, if they --," Warner began before Tapper interrupted him.

"They were doing that," Tapper interjected as Warner continued, "If the ceasefire, if the ceasefire stays between Israel and Iran and Iran's program is set back for whatever period of time..."

"I just mean as of today," the CNN host interrupted again. "I'm not saying you're saying this for the rest of your life and you know, whatever, but as of today, we don't know what's going to happen tomorrow. but as of today, isn't the world safe?"

"I am glad that these capabilities have been cut back," Warner conceded before cautioning, "Do we know what Iran's next step is going to be? Do we? Are we going to be saying the same thing if Iran now tries to race to a bomb in the trunk of a car, because we don't have any inspectors on the ground, are we going to be say that as well if Iran launches major cyber attacks against us, when this administration has literally cut half of the folks who do cyber security at the federal government level?"

"So I think it's too early to tell, okay" he continued before adding, "Am I glad to see some of this capabilities taken out? Absolutely."

You can watch below or at the link.

- YouTube youtu.be

GOP's Katie Britt blows off polls showing voters hate Trump's budget bill

During an appearance on CNN's "State of the Union," a smiling Sen. Katie Britt (R-AL) blew off polling showing that the Donald Trump megabill is a highly unpopular with voters after host Jake Tapper listed off the numbers.

Appearing as the bill was being read on the Senate floor, Britt gushed about the initiatives contained in the bill and claimed to have read all 900 pages of the document that has been constantly amended.

That was when the CNN host pointed out to her that the public is not on the president's side when it comes to what he has called his "big beautiful bill."

"So there's a slew of polling about this bill, as i'm sure you know," Tapper prompted his guest. "Pew, Kaiser, Quinnipiac, Washington Post, Fox –– all of it suggesting that this legislation right here is not popular with the American people."

"Senator [Thom] Tillis (R-NC) reportedly warned Republicans that you could face major losses in the midterm elections because of what's in this bill. He compared it to the backlash Democrats faced after passing Obamacare, and former first buddy Elon Musk called this bill, quote, 'Political suicide for the Republican party.' If Republicans lose the House or the Senate or both over this legislation, will it be worth it?" he asked.

"Look, the reforms in this bill are necessary, and the delivery. We're going to deliver actual solutions to the American people and I am excited about that," she enthused. "And I think when the American people actually get to see this in fruition, they absolutely are going to be too."

"I mean, you think about the things we're doing, like securing the border, not just now," she stated as she changed the subject. "We won't always have a President Trump who immediately came in and got border crossings down to basically zero. I mean, if you think about where we are there versus the influx under the Biden administration, if you think about where we've been in our national defense, not only has President Trump reinvigorated our armed services, we've seen recruiting rates go through the roof."

You can watch below or at the link:

- YouTube youtu.be

Lindsey Graham: Harvard's DEI programs allow people to 'spit on Jewish kids'

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) suggested that programs at Harvard University promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) allow students to "spit on Jewish kids."

"I know that [President Donald Trump] is sort of declaring war on Harvard because they're such an anti-Semitic place," Graham told ABC News host Jonathan Karl on Sunday. "They're allowing people to run around and spit on Jewish kids. This DEI stuff, you know, they get federal dollars."

Keep reading... Show less

Newsmax warns Dem mayoral candidate will bring 'animal sacrifices' to NYC

Newsmax pundit Ike Wingate warned that animal sacrifices are "coming" if Zohran Mamdani is elected as mayor of New York City.

Left-leaning writer Ellis Henican kicked off a panel on Sunday by praising Mamdani as a "very charismatic" person who ran a "terrific campaign."

Keep reading... Show less

'What's he talking about?' MSNBC panel stumped by Trump boast

Noting that Donald Trump appears to have retreated from talking about his unpopular trade plans, the panel on MSNBC's "The Weekend" were baffled by his one high-profile mention of negotiations with China on tariffs.

On Sunday morning the hosts and their guests were hard pressed to recall any trade deals the Trump administration has successfully brought to closure, with contributor Molly Jong-Fast joking, "I was promised 90 deals in 90- days."

That led co-host Elise Jordan to point to a Trump pronouncement on potential deals on Thursday where he vaguely rambled "We just signed with China. We have everybody. We're not going to make deals with everybody, some were just going to send them a letter, say thank you very much, you're going to pay 25, 35, 45 percent. We have one coming up, maybe with India –– very big one. We're going to open up India in the China deal. We're starting to open up China."

That led co-host Jonathan Capehart to exclaim, "Make it make sense. What's he talking about?"

Conservative Brendan Buck laughed and observed, "Okay, I worked on trade policy when I was in Congress. Look, trade deals are not just 'What's your tariff rate?' There's a reason that trade deals usually take a year, two years, sometimes like five years to negotiate because you're going literally line by line, product by product, 'What is the rate on this? What is our quota on that?'"

"Each one is a negotiation," he added. "He's just talking these big broad terms of like how much we're going to pay and he seems to think that us slapping a tariff on somebody is good for us in some way. We have this sort of quasi-deal with China. He's celebrating that we are going to have a higher tariff than they are. That just means we're paying more. And so there's a reason none of these things have come to fruition, because, I don't know, it's like, he doesn't appreciate what an actual trade agreement is."

You can watch below or at the link:

- YouTube youtu.be

Scott Jennings told 'that's your opinion' –– then nailed with fact check on CNN

CNN conservative Scott Jennings saw his defense of Donald Trump's continuing Iran attack claims of "total obliteration" dismantled piece by piece by "Table for Five" host Abby Phillip on Saturday morning.

After complaining about leaks that suggest the mission was far from the success the Trump administration is insisting upon, Jennings offered that the reports were designed to make Trump look bad.

"I mean, that's your opinion," host Phillip countered. "I think that's fine. But the reality is, when Trump says the Iran nuclear program has been eliminated, he basically said, 'It's done, it's it's ended.' There's a real legitimate question about whether that's a factual statement."

"Just this week, he was asked, 'What are you going to do if Iran is able to enrich uranium again?' and he said, 'Well, we'll bomb them again.' Does that sound like a nuclear program that he thinks is completely gone? " she asked.

"So, I mean, clearly there is a factual question here about whether or not the threat has been eliminated," she added before pointing out, "Even Republican senators like Lindsey Graham have acknowledged and others the threat has not been eliminated and that is something that American people need to know and understand."

You can watch below or at the link.

- YouTube youtu.be

'Arrogant' Amy Coney Barrett buried over 'out of bounds' personal attack

Justice Amy Coney Barrett was called out on Saturday morning for her thin-skinned and personal response to a dissent written by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Writing the 6-3 conservative majority opinion that handed the Donald Trump administration a win with its birthright citizenship ruling, Coney Barrett took a dismissive shot at Brown Jackson observations by writing, "We will not dwell on Justice Jackson’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself."

She then added. “We observe only this: Justice Jackson decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary.”

Appearing on MSNBC's "The Weekend," Slate legal analyst Mark Joseph Stern called Coney Barrett's personal attack "arrogant" and "out of bounds."

Addressing Brown Jackson's dissent, he told the hosts, "I think Jackson's blows clearly landed here, and Barrett responded with, what I do agree is a far too personal retort that accuses Justice Jackson of not really being smart enough, I think, to levy a strong criticism of her opinion. That's totally out of bounds, it's highly unusual, even when the justices disagree, they usually do so respectfully."

RELATED: 'Tempers are high' on Supreme Court after 'jarring' exchange: legal expert

"And here Barrett is going much further and I think the reason why is really obvious, right?" he continued. "Justice Jackson's dissent is one of the sharpest, fiercest, most blunt dissents we've ever seen. She is taking on the Supreme Court as an institution and the conservative super majority. It's one of several dissents she published this term where she accused the super majority on the right of bias toward the Trump administration, of surrendering the rule of law so that Trump can rule like a king."

"This is how the majority sees the country, that they really believe Trump should rule it with no limits and, you know, I think after this decision, it's kind of hard to argue with that, right?" he observed. "The majority sees a policy that is so patently unconstitutional and rather than understand that that's the emergency that courts need to address, it turns around and smacks down the lower courts and says, 'You went too far.'"

"So Jackson's criticism there was entirely appropriate and for Justice Barrett to act so wounded and respond so personally is really out of bounds, disrespectful and arrogant," he concluded.

You can watch below or at the link:

Keep reading... Show less

'Chaos all the way down': Analyst melts down over Supreme Court ruling

Slate Senior Writer Mark Stern had a lot to say on Friday about a recent Supreme Court ruling.

Earlier in the day, the Supreme Court issued a decision in Trump v. CASA that made nationwide injunctions illegal. Injunctions are court orders that prevent a government entity from enforcing a law or policy. The court said that such provisions amounted to judicial overreach.

Keep reading... Show less