NY Times reporter asks why the Jan. 6 committee won't subpoena Mo Brooks and Paul Gosar
Far-right activist Ali Alexander went into hiding after the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, but he did publish a video in which he claimed he met with GOP lawmakers such as Reps. Paul Gosar (R-AZ) and Mo Brooks (R-AL) ahead of the riots.
Speaking to MSNBC's Nicolle Wallace on Monday, former federal prosecutor Harry Litman explained that Alexander is cooperating with the Justice Department because, if he refuses, he could get as much as 10 years in jail.
"Somebody like Dan Scavino might say, I'll do a year for the boss," said Litman. "Alexander and anyone in the DOJ investigation has leverage of 10 to 15 years. That's what makes them talk and give fuller information. And he's got some real information to give that no one else has got, no one has received yet."
IN OTHER NEWS: 'Are y'all huffing paint?' RNC's attempt to paint Biden as anti-Semitic massively backfires
But it was New York Times reporter Mike Schmidt who cited claims of Republican lawmakers purportedly coordinating with Alexander ahead Jan. 6 -- which prompted him to ask why Congress hasn't talked to them if they intend to turn over every rock in their investigation.
"But if the Select Committee is trying to have more the authoritative account of what happened, then why aren't they talking to those members of Congress?" he asked. "The Jan. 6 committee gets a ton of positive publicity, especially on the left, for the fact that they have been willing to go as far as they have and that they cast the nets as far as they did," Schmidt said. "Those three people seem incredibly important to understanding what happened. And this investigation may end and the committee may never have interviewed them."
There's no evidence that the DOJ is speaking to them either, said Wallace. Alexander has just agreed to comply with the grand jury, so it may be that the investigators in the future will call those members to ask about their role.
See the video below:
NOW WATCH: 'Copious' evidence of Trump's criminality still may not force Merrick Garland to act
Leave a Comment
Related Post