Opinion
Trump's World Cup backfire erased him from the global view of America
That photo from Sunday at the World Cup.
I don’t even need to go any further because you automatically know what I’m talking about.
Spain, world champions, standing on the podium, arms open, ready to hoist the trophy, and Donald Trump planted there with them, soaking up a moment that belonged to somebody else.
FIFA’s president, who has long kissed Trump’s posterior, hurriedly tried to move him out of the way. Physically. At the biggest sporting event on the planet, Trump had to be nudged aside so the actual winners — not a loser like him — could have their time in the sun.
That image is only part of the story of this World Cup.
Go back a few weeks Trump's direct intervention to overturn U.S. soccer star Folarin Balogun's World Cup suspension sparked global backlash, with U.S. Soccer officials criticizing the meddling as a "moral stain" on the game.
The U.S. ended up losing its next game. The world celebrated that loss, crying vindication after a cheating Trump tried to fix it.
But the boos that followed the U.S. team after Trump stuck his nose where it didn’t belong weren't really about the team. They were about him. He cursed America's chances while the world cursed him.
Two moments. Same malevolent man. Same insidious instinct. Get in the middle of something that isn't his, make it about him, and let everyone else suffer in his wake.
But not quite.
I live in the New York City area, and for the last month I've been taking my usual runs along the Hudson River, past the train stops and ferry landings, and the tourist spots. And it has not looked like my city.
It looked like the world. Jerseys and hats from six continents. Flags I had to look up while I was running because I didn’t recognize them. People stopping dead in the middle of the riverwalk because the skyline caught them off guard.
I watched strangers photograph that breathtaking skyline with their breaths taken away. You could see the awe in their eyes. The excitement.
So I stopped a few people for the purpose of writing this column at the conclusion of the World Cup. I asked them where they were from, what they thought of this country, and what they thought of Donald Trump.
The first people I talked to were, coincidentally, a family from Spain. I suppose that should have been a personal harbinger of who would go on to win.
Father, mother, and two teenage sons, their English coming in pieces. They told me New York had been beautiful to them. Strangers at the train station walking them to the right platform. People at their hotel going out of their way. They were all smiling from ear to ear.
I asked about Trump, and the father didn't hesitate. He said, in effect, that Americans aren't like Donald Trump. He said Americans are like the people at the train station and the hotel. That's what he wanted to take home with him.
I met a retired couple from England near the World Trade Center sculpture around the corner from my building on the Hudson. It was right after the U.S. lost to Belgium. They told me, in no uncertain terms, that what Trump did was wrong. He had no business doing it.
They said they felt sorry for the American players, getting hated for something that wasn't their fault.
And then Sunday. That humiliating photo. And the world pounced, again, on the egomaniacal Trump. The neediness of it. The narcissism of a man who cannot let a moment exist unless he's standing in the middle of it. Trump belongs in only one place, Alcatraz, which he wants to upgrade, presumably for his upcoming stay.
But that picture from Sunday. My, oh my. What struck me wasn't the mockery that came from all sides of the globe. Or the unanimity of the condemnation. The whole world just knew, instantly, what it was looking at.
Here's what I’ve been thinking about over the last few days. Maybe it was a strange kind of blessing that this World Cup landed in the U.S. in the middle of Trump's second term.
The world already disliked and mocked him before the tournament started, and sadly, by extension Americans. Now, its worst instincts about him were validated. But that is only one side of the story.
Because the tournament was here, on our sidewalks and subway platforms, on buses and in hotels, all those people didn't just watch America from a distance. They walked through it. Ate in it. Got lost in it and got helped by strangers who didn't ask where they were from before pointing them in the right direction.
They're going home now, to their communities in Spain, England, and to every country whose flag I saw along the Hudson. They're going to tell two true stories at once. They'll talk about the ignoramus who couldn't stay out of a red card review and couldn't stay out of a trophy photo.
And they'll talk about the people of the U.S. they encountered, and how wonderful and helpful they were. And how beautiful our country is.
Trump wanted to be the story of this World Cup, and for two ugly — and brief — moments, he was.
Yet his intrusions can be cropped. He wasn’t top of mind to the Spanish father who's going to tell his sons that Americans aren't like that. And those kids will nod their heads in agreement.
Trump is temporary. He's a stain on two moments in a month-long tournament. What the rest of the world actually experienced here was the goodness, the beauty, the celebration, that will travel home with them, remain with them, and stand the test of time.
MAGA trolls are spitting mad as bulletproof Dem rises
Over the last six weeks or so, Hunter Biden has emerged as the strongest and most vocal critic of Donald Trump since Gov. Gavin “Studly” Newsom. But instead of using AI to trigger the MAGA cult, Hunter uses “FU,” like a true son of Fightin’ Irish Joe Biden, because he knows his very existence is enough to set them off.
And he couldn’t care less about what they say, because he’s already heard it all, from the not-actually-a-laptop to those thirst trap photos that looked like Herb Ritts took them. Remember when Marjorie Taylor Greene used to bring them to work with her because, like most Republican women, her partner just wasn’t lighting her up the way she needed? I always imagine the staff at the local Kinko’s screaming “Not It!” any time Marge would send her assistant in with yet another thumb drive full of “evidence.”
Anyway, Hunter’s Substack, “Where’s Hunter?”-- cheekily named for the weak MAGA tweets trolling him over his struggles with addiction while they fully ignore the Trump Crime Family — is a treasure trove of truth, showcasing his art and detailing his seven years of sobriety.
In the heart-wrenching entry called “It’s Dad,” Hunter shares the story of the infamous voicemail his father left him, which no one was meant to hear. MAGA mocked Hunter for it because that’s what unloved bullies do.
I don’t believe we’re entitled to know absolutely everything about a public figure’s life, but when that voicemail was released, all I heard, as the mother of sons myself, was his father's love for him. I heard a father’s pain over not knowing how to help his beloved and only surviving son. I understood how much Joe wished his love was enough to protect and save Hunter, because that’s how all loving parents feel. If only our love could be manifested as a protective bubble when we can’t be with our kids.
Hunter also wrote about Lindsey Graham (remember how he died and Trump really didn’t care? Yeah, anyway, back to the garbage fire) better than any Republican did, because once again, a Biden led by example with grace and humility rather than finding a convenient scapegoat to blame everything on.
Everything that happened to Hunter as part of Trump’s political witch hunt happened to a private citizen in our country because the entire Trump Crime Family is threatened by the Biden family's record of being good human beings. Hunter also recognizes Trump’s sick obsession with his family, and the harsh language he uses is merited when he’s talking about what he and his father have dealt with thanks to years of MAGA bullying.
Hunter gave a masterclass in pushing back against Trump in a new and very NSFW interview with journalist and fellow Trump nemesis Jim Acosta this week, and he didn’t hold back one bit when he was asked what he would say if he were sitting across a table from the Orange Menace.
“I’d tell him to go f---- himself,” Hunter replied without hesitation.
And a nation of Democratic women swooned.
“This man has tried to torture me for ... 10 years,” Hunter continued. “The s--t that he says about my dad. His obsession with tormenting my dad. Hanging a picture of an autopen on the colonnade. Demeaning him and all the things he said about him.
“What the f--k kind of man would I be if I didn’t tell him to go f-- himself?”
This Jersey Girl fully approves of that take, as well as all of the other swears Hunter uses when rightfully raging against the adjudicated rapist Epstein Bestie. That’s really how all Democrats should speak about Trump, especially after his multiple losses last week, from his payout to E. Jean Carroll to his pet Todd Blanche tanking his Senate hearings to his shambolic appearance during his Biggest Lie Ever speech on Thursday, which has left Republicans in full disarray.
Amid that rambling nonsense was another targeted threat to anyone who writes or tells any truths about him that he doesn’t like. Hunter Biden has already won in that category as well this week, to the tune of $1.7 million, after emerging victorious in his defamation suit against former Overstock CEO and Trump sycophant Patrick Byrne.
You might recall that farce, but here’s an ICYMI rundown: Three years ago, Hunter sued Byrne (a longtime Trump ally who repeatedly promoted the Big Lie about the 2020 election) over his claims that he had reached out to the Iranian government in 2021, offering to have his father “unfreeze” $8 billion in Iranian funds in exchange for a bribe. It was a major MAGA trolling point, which Trump himself shared on his shell company-funded Truth Social.
Byrne is also named in the Epstein Files, just like Trump and unlike anyone with the last name Biden, which is just another weird coincidence.
What I love most about Hunter Biden’s DGAF attitude is that it’s also my attitude. He tells all of the harsh truths about himself before MAGA can, taking the wind out of their collective bullying sails. He points at everything Republicans are willfully ignoring about Trump and says all of the things elected Democrats can’t — at least, not publicly — lest they risk their proximity to power. But what does Hunter Biden have to lose, after everything he’s been through?
Absolutely nothing.
What can MAGA say about him that hasn’t already been said?
Absolutely nothing.
So what can Democrats learn from Hunter Biden?
Absolutely EVERYTHING.
They might not use the same salty language, but the truth about Trump is still true, no matter how you say it. Facts don’t care if you swear, because Trump is the real profanity, and he doesn’t get to decide what’s true.
Even if he never runs for office, Hunter Biden will be a guiding voice during a dark time, and I hope more people will start listening to him.
Trump loyalists beware — this death sends a perilous message
Dying doesn’t automatically erase a person’s track record, no matter the circumstances. But you can tell how little the late Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) truly meant to Donald Trump simply (stressing that “simp” part) based on the “eulogy” the president posted on Truth Social.
Truth Social
Not only did he make Graham’s death all about himself, but he also used a photo that identified him as the “Acting President of Venezuela,” because Trump has to make literally everything about himself — even someone else’s death.
Trump also didn’t waste any time making sure Lindsey’s Senate seat didn’t remain empty for long, especially with his favorite pet, Todd Blanche, being grilled like a cheap Trumpsteak by the Senate Judiciary Committee. Trump’s co-conspirators and paid shills sent out flowery messages of MAGA propaganda that praise Graham for *checks notes* never speaking out against the Dear Leader.
MAGA is also fine with Trump’s fellow war criminal, Benjamin Netanyahu, not only praising Graham, but returning to the United States to attend Graham’s funeral.
Poor Lindsey’s body was still warm when Republican South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster appointed Graham’s younger sister, Darline, who has precisely zero years of government experience, to serve in that seat until the midterm elections.
Why no, that’s not normal in any way, but when was the last time our lives felt anything like normal? Trump went from zero to president, so why not zero to senator? He needs that vote to secure Blanche as Attorney General, but since Republicans are actually breaking ranks, her vote may not even matter.
Graham’s death has nearly fallen out of the news cycle, replaced by Mitch McConnell’s not-at-all proof-of-life photo op and Trump’s Biggest Lie Ever speech on Thursday night. But the initial response to his sudden demise and an “investigation” by the FBI as a response has set off the online conspiracy theorists, which is just par for the (golf) course when it comes to the way death is handled on social media.
Nobody can just die of natural causes anymore. Graham was said to have been complaining about not feeling well on Saturday night. But he didn’t want to miss his chance to praise Netanyahu yet again on Meet the Press Sunday morning, so he reportedly told staffers he would get medical attention after the interview.
“I can’t die now,” Graham is said to have joked. “I still need to do the Russia sanctions, get Iran sorted out, and do Israeli-Saudi normalization.”
The Trump regime’s version of “normalization” is pretty far from normal, but few were willing to point that out when talking about Graham’s death.
Still, there are tactful ways to talk about someone reprehensible that you had to work with, for example, as former President Joe Biden did.
Leave it to Joe Cool to always set the standard for keeping it classy. A lot of Democrats did a lot of tightrope walking with this one, calling Graham “their friend” that they “often disagreed” with. Nobody with proximity to power wants to lose that proximity, as Charlotte Clymer sharply pointed out on Facebook on Wednesday.
As for me, I shared the same three screenshots of Graham that have been living on my phone for as long as Lindsey has been compromised.
There was a time when Lindsey Graham told the truth about Trump, but then he got an invitation to play golf that he definitely should’ve turned down, because he sealed his legacy on a putting green.
The official cause of death was “Myocardial infarction related to heart disease,” and self-recrimination for 10 years is hell on the ticker. Self-hate sure does rot you from the inside out.
I’m not sorry for any of the energy I spent criticizing everything about Lindsey “Friend of Israel” Graham, from his hawkish tactics to always voting against the LGBTQ community. Anyone who tweeted anything less than a glowing post about “Leningrad” Lindsey Graham got the full clutched-pearl version of MAGA, who took projection language to another level whenever they talked about the way we were talking about him.
It’s ridiculous for them to keep pushing multiple false narratives at once, because they can’t keep up, but the notion that death makes someone a saint really doesn’t work when their Dear Leader sets this kind of an example.
Telling the truth about our elected officials, both living and no longer living, will remain an act of resistance until Democrats are back in power, especially when the GOP refuses to ever acknowledge the truth about Graham, Trump, the Epstein Files, or anything else.
Furious Trump eviscerates this low-level lackey — for copying his signature move
Yes, we are all aware of the fact that irony died a tragic death by suicide sometime late in 2016, and yet its ghost still haunts the Trump administration, dragging chains heavy enough to compel a theoretical physicist to declare the "spirit" is alive — and not at all well.
On Thursday, news broke that the technician Donald Trump has used to load his teleprompter before major speeches had made $100,000 on Kalshi — the internet betting site where, yes, you can gamble on who wins the World Cup (Argentina at 42%) or even how many times President Donald Trump will say "Iran" during his evening speech.
Of course, the teleprompter guy has been making significant money for quite a while, knowing what Trump will say. The only bet that one couldn't find was a line on Trump saying, "I am truly sorry, it was my fault."
But it appears that Gabriel Perez, the teleprompter technician in trouble, could possibly have arranged a 1% chance on Trump saying such a thing, perhaps something akin to, "Quite obviously, I should have become president in 2008, and things would be much better now, with me still president 18 years later, and for that I am truly sorry, it was my fault for allowing someone to convince me that my greatness needed to wait" — or something equally stupid. One dollar becomes $100, and Gabriel Perez would be, as he has been to this point, an almost laughably amateur player in Trump administration corruption.
You just knew it would be a Hispanic man to take the fall, didn't you? According to ABC News:
According to the sources, Kalshi alerted its regulator, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), to the suspicious activity on its "Mentions" market, where users can bet on whether specific words, phrases, or topics are uttered during a public speech.
Wow, the CFTC is really on the ball, am I right? And yeah, the Trump administration felt terribly bad about it all because this pittance is against the rules:
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Thursday afternoon, following ABC News' report, that Perez has been put on unpaid administrative leave. Leavitt said she spoke with President Trump about it, and he thought it was a "disgrace" and made the decision himself to put Perez on unpaid leave.
"Because everyone in this White House knows, there is at least a one-million-dollar minimum on administration corruption, or you're on your own, loser," Karoline Leavitt did NOT go on to say, but she may as well have because we knew what she meant.
Hear those chains? Yes, irony's ghost follows Leavitt around like a lovesick teenager, and Trump like a low-level bagman.
I mean, come on. Either get in the game and commit, or take your chances that you'll get used as a trophy catch, hung out to dry as an "example" of how clean this administration runs, when he was just doing his best to act like his boss.
After all, it was Trump's brokerage account that bought Intel stock reportedly in the $1 million–$5 million range during the first quarter of 2026, along with numerous other technology stocks. And then, guess what? Separately, Trump made announcements regarding China and tariffs, moving markets significantly, leading to absolute outrage because his brokerage account did amazingly "fine."
Did Trump call himself a disgrace and put himself on administrative leave? No, Trump says that his brokerage account acts independently. Does that sound like the president you know? The likelihood is that Trump guided those trades and lied about it.
Meanwhile, Uday and Qusay... sorry, fact check, sons Don Jr. and Eric Trump are heavily invested in companies that just happen to get heavy "Department of War" contracts. From the Washington Post:
Donald Trump Jr., through 1789 Capital, and Eric Trump, through American Ventures/Dominari, invested in numerous defense-technology companies after Trump's reelection. Those companies subsequently received billions of dollars in Pentagon contracts, contract options, or eligibility for future awards. The Washington Post identified more than a dozen such companies, collectively receiving over $3 billion in government business after the investments.
By all appearances and consistent with past accusations, it sure looks like the Trump family skips over the small percentage fee Kalshi charges and just places perfect bets in investments that hit just as solidly as the number of times Trump says "Iran" in a speech.
And never mind the 747s and the appearance of pay for pardons, this poor sap (Hey, $100k in this administration is like breadline poor) is the one feeling the heat of a president who says Gabriel Perez is a "disgrace" and on leave.
The guy should actually get a medal. Do you have any idea how hard it is to make money on the shady side of this administration and be called a disgrace? Kalshi would put it under one percent, but now we're drifting. It is hard not to escape the sense that if Perez simply had the sense (and the brokerage account, but he was getting there), to jump when Donald Trump tweeted about Palantir's greatness and bought some "PLTR" stock seconds after it was tweeted, get a nice percentage for the day, he'd be promoted to writing speeches on the limitless opportunities in the Trump economy.
** Hold up: I don't know whether "PLTR" immediately jumped in value, but since Perez was into betting, THAT would've been a good one, having it traded seconds after the tweet.
Had poor Perez simply been in the "right market" — meaning the stock market or owning shares of a closely held corporation, he would not be hailed as a hero by many of us in this country, but only because his name would get lost in the dozens of other administration officials acting similarly or doing and making much, much more.
True, there is no law against a president or vice president acting in a complete conflict of interest, other than that big law called "Articles of Impeachment." But Trump seems to consider articles of impeachment to also be a conflict of interest and of no relevance to him.
But what is the Kalshi line on a Trump official fired for profiting off the administration's moves? OH! And whoops, here comes irony again to teach us a lesson.
Chains dropped to the floor: If you are going to rip people off through pure power moves based on knowledge gleaned during lunch or a speech with "your president," then for God's sake, make it worth it! If you eclipse that million-dollar baseline, it might be seen as pure American capitalism at its finest, protected by the law of the land, now reduced to the man himself.
You might even be welcomed for a round of golf with your hero. Of course, you would have to pay the greens fees. Those are probably really steep on such an afternoon, if you know what I mean.
Last thing, be extra careful to earn an extra zero with a Hispanic name. Sorry, Mr. Perez, you are, actually, a disgrace. But wow, man... What are the odds?
Never mind.
Jason Miciak is a Rawstory Columnist and former Editor of Occupy Democrats, an author, political consultant, attorney, and single parent girldad. Please follow him on Bluesky, and he can be reached at jasonmiciak@gmail.com, and reads and appreciates the comments.
This tech traitor has blood on his hands after rolling over for Trump
When Tim Cook steps down as CEO of Apple on September 1, he will be leaving behind a company enjoying record-breaking profits. In just the second quarter alone, Apple reportedly earned over $100 billion. Financially, the company couldn’t be any stronger. Ethically, it couldn’t be in any more peril.
Since Donald Trump returned to office, his masked goon squad—aka ICE—has killed 10 people. Fifty, if you include the roughly 40 who reportedly died while in custody. And that's not counting the tens of thousands who have allegedly been injured, brutalized, or wrongfully detained at the hands of these poorly trained, poorly screened, and increasingly lawless agents.
To date, not a single ICE agent has been held personally accountable for their actions.
While it’s impossible to know how many lives might have been saved had Cook not bowed to pressure from the Trump Justice Department and removed IceBlock, the app that gives communities advance warning of ICE activity, allowing people to avoid potentially dangerous encounters, one can’t help but wonder how many of those tragedies might have been prevented had Cook stood his ground.
IceBlock operates on essentially the same principle as Waze—and even Apple Maps—which alert motorists to police activity and speed traps ahead. Yet, Waze is still available on the App Store.
By eliminating one of the few tools communities could use to warn one another of potentially dangerous encounters, Apple sided with a government that had already demonstrated its willingness to use executive power to achieve what it could not accomplish in a court of law. We'd already seen those strong-arm tactics succeed against major law firms and universities that chose capitulation over litigation. Apple simply became just another institution to fold.
What makes Cook's decision particularly striking is that it represents a complete reversal of the principles he, himself, once defended.
In 2016, Cook refused repeated demands from the FBI to build a backdoor into the iPhone used by one of the San Bernardino shooters, arguing that weakening encryption for one case would endanger the privacy and security of millions. He rightly stood on principle, even in the face of enormous political pressure.
ICEBlock developer Joshua Aaron has said in numerous interviews that one of the primary reasons he never released the app for Android was Google's inability to protect user data to the same degree as Apple. Apple, he believed, was "100% safe.”
Or, so he thought.
All it took for Apple to eviscerate that promise was a five-minute phone call to its CEO. No lawsuits. No subpoenas. No prolonged legal battle. Just a phone call.
By agreeing to remove ICEBlock, without so much as an ounce of pushback, Tim Cook betrayed not only Steve Jobs' vision of technology empowering ordinary people, but his own.
At the time, Apple tried to justify the decision by citing safety concerns—that someone could theoretically use the app to locate ICE agents and commit violence. Yet the company has yet to explain why that rationale applies to ICEBlock but not to Waze or Apple Maps, both of which notify users of police activity in remarkably similar ways.
The precedent this sets for Big Tech—and what it means for the everyday user—should keep all of us awake at night. If the companies entrusted with the most intimate details of our lives are willing to fold at the slightest hint of political pressure, then none of us can be certain our privacy is protected, no matter what their policies promise.
Good luck putting that horse back in the barn.
Huge omissions in Trump's petty little speech snowball it into his most important ever
We have all become so hypnotized, desensitized, bored, angered, and abused by President Donald Trump that at this point, it's far more productive to point to what Trump won't do, won't say, than all he will.
On Thursday evening, Trump meant to bring the country to a standstill with a presidential address, something normally reserved for Space Shuttle explosions, 9-11, or the hunt for Osama Bin Laden. In a country at war with Iran, at war with inflation, warring against wages and underemployment, and mostly at war with itself, Trump talked about the only issue that moves him: how the world perceives him day to day.
But even in that litany of grievances as to why the "most powerful man on Earth" remains ever the victim of even the pettiest of plots, it was what we didn't hear that roared.
Trump told us that “great damage has been done to our country,” and “Our elections were left vulnerable to being rigged and stolen, and the trust of the American people was lost. This cannot be allowed to continue.”
The allegation is just so damned tired that far too many in the media, and nearly all of Trump's supporters, have failed to ask some simple follow-ups: "If the most egregious of these offenses happened in the 2020 election, then you were the president at the time, charged with protecting this nation, and so how did you allow such great damage to be done to our country, and why should you be trusted to ensure it never happens again?"
Again, one gleans the real news here from what's not being said. The reason there's no scandal about Trump allowing the horrific manipulation of our 2020 election is that there was no horrific manipulation of the 2020 election. It is almost like the country, worn out by his incessant neediness and bullspit, has come to an arrangement suiting both; "We won't blame you for allowing our elections to be so easily rigged so long as it's fairly clear you're simply doing this for your ego, and won't act on it — not yet anyway."
Quite frankly, the deal has actually worked in the best interests of both parties for a while. Donald Trump gets to nurse the ultimate narcissistic injury back to health by convincing himself it was all wrong and he beat Joe Biden, and we rest assured that nothing is really going to happen because we've reached a sick detente — like the nominees for Senate approval who are asked: "Who won the 2020 election?"
They refuse to answer, the silence is deafening, the answer on display for all who hear through the silence, and again — the real news lies in all that wasn't said.
But the ultimate tell, the one that really proves that this is nothing more than an ego bath and the predicate for future claims that elections are rigged runs through China — no, not the nation of China but the China "issue." As reported by the Times:
Mr. Trump described a series of allegations about voter interference in the 2020 vote. He said that China had bought, stolen or hacked tens of millions of voter data files across 18 states. And he attacked a “deep state” conspiracy that he said was aimed at suppressing the information.
Wake up, please! Yes, it is extremely hard to care about anything this man says on any given day, but this one demands your attention. The President of the United States just effectively accused our current greatest adversary of manipulating the election and stealing it from him, the president at the time. Take that accusation dead seriously for just one moment in order to absorb the importance of what did not follow.
Having just accused a superpower of effectively illegally choosing the next American president over the rightful man chosen by Americans, having just accused that superpower of doing so with supposed proof that China did it in all those documents, did the American president do what any president would leap to do in the face of such an outrage?
Did Donald Trump immediately demand that China explain itself? Did he lay out a set of sanctions he will impose and forward to Congress even more punitive sanctions against the nation behind such a plan? (President Obama and a bipartisan Congress wasted less than two months in sanctioning Russia for real election interference in 2016, and yet still affirmed Trump as the winner of the election and the rightful incoming president. Of course, Obama and that Congress had real proof of such interference.) Did Donald Trump call out Chinese President Xi Jinping and demand an answer, a summit, or even threaten war with China for having done so, or threaten war if they ever do so again?
No. And that silence is the real reveal, one circling the globe, proof once again that the U.S. is in decline due to a petty man, with petty false grudges, consumed with monetizing each moment, and will sell his own country out to anyone buying.
Because Trump skipped right over the fact that the world's only other superpower, according to Trump's own theory, displaced him as president, and instead went to war on... Americans, his real enemy — American citizens who just happen to be politically opposed to him.
“Yet those responsible for sounding the alarm instead kept the information secret and hidden,” Mr. Trump said. “They did not disclose to me as president or to anyone else, and to the best of our knowledge, they did not inform Congress.”
Who is "they"? He never says, not really. Doesn't need to, so long as "they" exist in some liminal space in which Trump lives his alternative life, where he is always the "winner."
Set aside the fact that he was president at the time and thus "they" should never have been in a position to keep such information from him (as if something that explosive would not have leaked). Having just accused China of what is essentially an act of war against the United States, Trump moved to this personal war against his only real enemy, the domestic one, the one he is prepared to wage war against, troops, tanks, all of it.
And even though he has no more real evidence against Americans stealing an election from him than he does with China, it doesn't matter because all he really needs is the accusation. The accusation itself justifies all the news to be found in all that was left unsaid. The accusation says, "Don't call me a loser to Joe Biden because I didn't lose!" Like warm milk to soothe the angry baby, but much more dangerously, the accusation says, "And we cannot trust any upcoming election in which any Democrat wins.
He is saying this despite the fact that it's his job to protect the nation from international threats. But instead of threatening to send three carrier groups to control the port of Hong Kong should China make such an attempt again, Trump did all he could to stifle the votes of Americans, votes that might go against him — actually aiding any nation that believes it benefits by keeping the U.S. under Republican control, nations like China and every nation run by a despotic dictator who can manipulate Trump through flattery and currency to obtain a deal favorable to them.
Unlike the message we're hearing from most American media, Trump's Thursday night speech roared with critical information American voters desperately need. The problem is that the roar came from all that was left unsaid, unacted upon, and unimportant because it's all unsubstantiated.
Snap out of the Trump daze just for a few seconds! The American president just accused China of kicking him out of the Oval Office in 2020! If Donald Trump actually believed such a thing, and if Donald Trump believed in his job as protector of the nation, not himself, we would, today, be on very nearly a war footing with one of the only countries on earth that could give us a real fight.
Instead? Nothing new, everything already said, documents dumber than ham, disinteresting as Jesse Watters, and as untruthful as having settled eight wars.
Don't buy the media line about Thursday night. Donald Trump made one of the most important speeches of either term. It wasn't just what wasn't said, but also the unspoken promise that it won't ever be said when he says Democrats grabbed both branches of Congress through RIGGED elections. Not a single Republican victory will be questioned, another silent tell, only that one is just cute enough to get a giggle.
If you just a) Pay close attention even when you know he lies and repeats, and b) Listen closely to what's not said, you will c) Not only understand exactly what is happening, but have the answer to confront a Trump supporter, or a Democratic candidate fighting a "RIGGED" question before the election, or an accusation after a win.
Presidential addresses still matter. But with Trump, the power lays in what he doesn't say.
Jason Miciak is a Rawstory columnist, former editor of Occupy Democrats, an author, political consultant, attorney, and single parent girldad. Please follow on Bluesky and he can be reached at jasonmiciak@gmail.com and reads and appreciates the community within the comments.
Hidden beneath Trump's bogus babble was this terrifying fact
I watched the horror show that was Donald Trump’s address to his base Thursday night, the one not covered by ABC and NBC on their traditional over-the-air networks (the ones fewer and fewer people watch, anyway).
It was a predictably appalling display because it showed the depths to which the president will sink to rig the midterms and save his base of absolute power. Six years after the 2020 General Election, he still pretends he got screwed out of his rightful victory despite every court in the land finding his claim lacked even the thinnest degree of merit.
The math is pretty clear.
Trump lost to Joe Biden by seven million votes. Even if every one of the 280,000 noncitizens Trump says exist voted against him, that still leaves him roughly 6.72 million short. The picture he painted on Thursday of a grand conspiracy by China and The Deep State to steal the 2020 Election was pretty much the same mumbo-jumbo, just with a perplexingly bizarre foreign twist.
None of the supposed evidence of his getting screwed that was released after his speech changes a thing. Everyone knows it, Trump included. It’s just a game he’s playing to build a leverage case going forward. That, at the end of the day, is what all of this gratuitous grievance is about.
There were two especially frightful undercurrents to the speech that need be pointed out, one right there on the surface and the other strategically hidden.
The first was the utter conviction with which Trump spoke in his barrage of bogus babble. This is perhaps the secret of his support from the MAGA base. His shamelessness comes across to the sane as the speechifying equivalent of a Cyclospora infection. But to his people, he is the pied piper.
There is never any actual evidence. Trump relies on bold assertions and unwavering confidence to mask the absence of facts. Leave it to a raging sociopath who is expert at sounding like he believes his own bull to connect with the stupid, the brainwashed, the vulnerable. He spews it loudly and repeatedly, and somehow that’s taken by them as indisputable.
But beyond that is the second and more disturbing aspect to the speech: Trump’s motivation for doing it in the first place. It had nothing to do with actual safety and security concerns in our voting; it’s about what he will do to stay in power. The answer is anything and everything, including eroding confidence in the legitimacy of our elections and destroying the system itself.
In short, Thursday’s speech was a declaration of war on the midterms. Trump knows the polls are showing a Republican bloodbath in the House at the very least and possibly even a loss in the Senate. So, his address was solely about establishing a pretext to dispute and potentially overturn otherwise free and fair elections.
He knows at this point that he probably isn’t going to get his voter-suppressing SAVE America Act passed. If his party tanks the midterms, there’s a chance he gets impeached a third time. And there’s a fresh look at his involvement in the Epstein Files. And all of his stock and crypto deals are suddenly closely examined under a microscope.
Plus, we see how the man reacts to losing. He can’t handle it. He will deny., deny, deny, then deny some more – shifting blame to those who would wish him ill. He has no understanding of, nor appetite for, accepting a loss with grace and humility and moving on.
So we have determined that there is nothing Trump is above to keep his presidential gravy train running. The speculation is all pretty much out there but bears repeating, since democracy itself is about to face its sternest test in many a generation.
His trying to cancel the midterms outright is one option, of course. But I doubt Trump could get away with it even from those in his own party. I don’t see how he could manufacture a national emergency serious enough to easily justify it. Plus, what would canceling them mean? Would America be OK with never having the elections at all? It seems like an implausibility.
Of greater concern is sending in the ICE brigade to generate enough chaos to throw the elections into the courts. Also, claiming nonexistent Chinese interference, Trump could order the Department of Homeland Security to seize ballot boxes to account for the supposed massive fraud that his Thursday speech already outlined.
Along those same lines, Trump might also challenge the voting procedures enough to litigate the thing into oblivion, so it holds up the certification of the midterm races for months and freshly minted senators and representatives are unable to be seated in Congress. Meanwhile, the Republican majority in both houses continues forth.
There is also the looming possibility of the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers being dispatched to blue states to protest and wreak havoc, January 6 style. This time, it could be a hundred times worse.
Don’t expect the courts to save us. If we have learned nothing else over the past year and a half, it’s that the president will stop at nothing to get what he wants and no entity has the will and authority to obstruct him. And if the whole thing winds up in the Supreme Court, all bets are off, as we know. There is very little evidence of that corrupt body doing the right thing.
The overwhelming expectation is that something is going to happen. But I’m choosing not to be a hopeless pessimist. My thought is that while it’s hardly a sure thing, the system will hold and Trump won’t succeed. For one thing, we’re more than onto him. There will be no surprises this time.
I have to believe we can ultimately triumph over an 80-year-old mentally ill criminal. But it won’t be easy.
(Ray Richmond is a longtime journalist/author and an adjunct professor at Chapman University in Orange, CA.)
The true admission in Trump's speech
Nick Anderson is a Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist.
A minefield laid by Trump is enough to decimate the whole GOP
It was one of those stories that causes barely a ripple of interest anymore, one that we’ve become so inured to that it passes almost unnoticed but that would trigger a massive investigation/impeachment hearing were this any other administration.
Here was the New York Times headline on Tuesday: “Trump Paid $2 Million by South Korean Company Facing Trade Investigation.”
Given the billion-dollar figures that accompany President Trump’s name seemingly each hour, it was easy to dismiss this one. I mean, a measly two million bucks? That’s like chump change now. A rounding error. Yet reading the story brought a fresh perspective on the everyday bribery, grift and graft that drives our criminal-in-chief.
The $2 million payment was revealed on Trump’s mandatory 927-page financial disclosure report, part of the $2.2 billion he earned in 2025. It was made by something called the Base Group, and the document referred to it only as a “nonrefundable development fee” (evidently the latest Orwellian term for payoffs). The Times was told in a statement that the payment was related to “a still-unannounced golf course project.”
Here is where things get still sketchier: this Base Group and its corporate affiliate Korea Aluminum were charged with circumventing U.S. trade duties. The payment was purportedly unrelated to the investigation into the company and its near decade of courting the Trump family. Yeah right.
The article maintained that the financial ties between Trump and this company “illustrate the minefield Mr. Trump has created” with various foreign business interests all over the world.
Of course, a spokesman for the Trump Organization was aghast that anyone could possibly infer that the $2 million had anything close to the whiff of a payoff that it appears to be. He defiantly maintained, “Any suggestion that this transaction was driven by anything other than legitimate business considerations is pure fiction.”
Seriously? Pure fiction? Not even quasi-fiction? It’s like, “Oh, dear me, how could you possibly imply that anything surrounding this president is anything less than completely ethical and above-board?”
Excuse me while I take a few moments to laugh hysterically.
Let me back up a moment to address the Times’ use of the word “minefield” in describing the environment Trump has created in the White House. Because no, it’s not a minefield at all. It needs to be called precisely what it is in the headline of the story.
Corruption.
At the very least – and I do mean very – it creates the appearance of a conflict of interest and calls into great question Trump’s integrity. (And no one understands better than me the absurdity of putting “integrity” and “Trump” in the same sentence.) To pretend otherwise is disingenuous at best and seems to prove the point.
The Base Group is but a tiny piece of at least $125 million in payments that Trump’s holding company collected last year directly from foreign sources in several countries, according to the story.
What’s consistently astonishing is that not even the thinnest attempt is made any longer to hide the self-dealing. Trump is operating like a guy who has Congress in his front hip pocket and the Supreme Court in his back pocket. He appears to believe that the immunity he’s been granted extends to every area of his life, not just his presidency. And at the moment, he’s probably right.
The corruption being enabled and tolerated at the highest levels of our government is an international disgrace. The Republicans, who have not done a single thing to so much as acknowledge it, much less put a stop to it, own it just as much as does Trump and his cronies who are fleecing the country and destroying the rule of law in real time. It would only take 10 of them to put the brakes on this madness, yet they choose to do nothing.
Of course, Trump’s $2.2 billion gross revenue windfall last year – more than triple his $622 million total from 2024 – represents a shamelessly grotesque profiting from the presidency. The blatant grift is likely only to rise in 2026. I mean, what’s to stop this guy from raiding the U.S. Treasury itself and snatching $20 billion, $50 billion, $100 billion?
Let’s take a closer look at the $2.2 billion. We know that a majority of it came from crypto scams. But think about how much money that is. Here’s some simple math:
Over the course of a year, $2.2 billion is:
- A bit over $6 million dollars a day.
- $250,000 an hour.
- $4,167.00 per minute.
- $69.44 every single second.
In the time it will take you to read this column (depending on how slow or quick you are), Trump will have made between $12,000 and $18,000, if we take last year’s income as a gauge. That’s an appalling use of his office to generate massive amounts of wealth. By all accounts, it’s the primary reason he wanted to be back in the White House. That, and of course destroying everything he lays his hands on.
Trump is selling out our nation to line his bank accounts. As he’s found, this presidency thing is the best con going. Kickbacks are his love language. And yet the MAGA crowd still points to his decision not to take his $400,000 annual presidential salary as laughable evidence of his being a patriot, even if he earns that much back in a little over an hour and a half.
Despite overwhelming evidence, the New York Times article failed to prove a definitive quid pro quo link between the Base Group and Trump. Yet the investigation into the company (dating to at least 2022) was dropped as soon as the $2 million payment was made. It’s not difficult to connect those dots.
In Trump’s world, this is what is known as protection money. You take care of the boss, he takes care of you. If you don’t cough it up, well, it’s a matter of, “Nice little company you got there. Be a shame if something were to happen to it.”
(Ray Richmond is a longtime journalist/author and an adjunct professor at Chapman University in Orange, CA.)
A crack exposes J.D. Vance as an even bigger creep than anyone imagined
During my Capitol Hill days eons ago, I made friends with a handful of Secret Service agents. It was during my crazy Dewey Beach summers on the Delaware shore.
Once in a while, depending on how many beers I had, and they had, I'd ask them questions about the job, what it was like, and who they liked and disliked. They rarely budged on disclosing any details.
But personalities leaked through anyway. I know they liked Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush. And only one time I heard something negative. It was about another very high-profile individual, who I will not gossip about here.
They trashed this person because they did not like them. And the fact that it was so rare to hear them complain is exactly the point. These are people trained not to talk. When I heard them rail on this person, I was shocked, not only because it was surprising to hear, as it was someone I liked, but because they had real antipathy for them.
Which is why the scuttlebutt out this week says so much about J.D. Vance.
MS NOW's Carol Leonnig and Vaughn Hillyard reported that agents assigned to protect the vice president and his family are "fed up" with a pattern of last-minute, expensive, and, I suppose by the standards of every prior vice president, unprecedented travel demands.
The story that broke it open was that agents were mobilized last Thursday to join a Marine Corps helicopter crew and fly Vance's young son across town to a golf lesson at Joint Base Andrews.
The flight only didn't happen because of thunderstorms. Marine Two costs taxpayers somewhere between $16,000 and $24,600 an hour to fly, according to Defense Department estimates. Previous vice presidents had their kids driven to activities in an SUV, like normal people.
That's not an isolated and inconvenient indulgence. The Vances have reportedly used government helicopters on short notice to go house-hunting in Middleburg, Virginia. Warning to childless cat ladies in that area — J.D. might be on his way, but I digress.
Sources told MS NOW the detail has taken to minting its own dark joke about it that includes coins and stickers reading "Bobcat OTR Survivors Club.” Bobcat being Vance's Secret Service code name, OTR meaning "off the record," the internal term for these no-notice movements that blow up agents' days off and force security plans to be improvised on the fly.
"The detail is tired of them not giving notice on things and making everything an OTR," one person familiar with the frustration said. "He thinks he can still move around like a U.S. Senator."
One source put it more bluntly, "That is RIDICULOUS. Pence and Harris never pulled anything like that."
Vance's office responded, of course, with a perhaps disingenuous statement thanking agents for their service and noting the "unique challenge" of protecting a vice president with young children. I am sure behind the scenes the quick-tempered Vance was furious.
Sure, it’s tough to guard kids. I can only imagine. The Vances are the first vice-presidential family with small kids since Al Gore's in the 1990s, and it’s got to be a real logistical quagmire, but also for the Vances. I’m sure they want the maximum protection for those kids, and that’s understandable.
However, the logistics don't explain why career Secret Service supervisors are telling reporters, and on the record no less, that they've never seen anything like this.
Here's what I learned from hanging around agents that are part of a non-talkative profession. When people whose entire job is discretion start finding ways to vent to national reporters, that's saying quite a bit about the nastiness that must exude from J.D. Vance.
The leak means their frustration has busted through professionalism. In a sense they’re just mirroring J.D. because, from the sound of it, he doesn’t appear to have much professionalism.
In other words, one can only assume that he must be such an obnoxious jerk, because if he was a terrific and kind man, those agents would gladly, and without complaint, go the extra mile for him.
And it fits a pattern with Vance. In April, on a trip to Rome, Vance stood next to Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and cracked that she "could've called me a jerk" in Italian and he "wouldn't even know.” He must have sensed something from her too.
Last week, while in Milwaukee, he tried out a Northern Midwest accent, joking "Wis-cawntin" before trying again with "Wis-cawnsin."
The crowd stared back at him in dead silence.
He's had a similar moment addressing troops, where an attempted joke fell flat. There’s the childless cat lady. John Oliver called him an "abrasive MAGA a--hole.” Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear called him “arrogant,” among other things.
Before the 2024 presidential election, I spoke with Republican pollster Sarah Longwell, who was running focus groups that included plenty of Republicans. Referring to Vance, she told me, "I haven't seen as much disdain for a candidate since Mike Pence refused to certify the 2020 election. I mean, the swing voters just don't like Vance"
And neither, apparently, do his Secret Service agents.
I'll say what I can't prove and what I believe anyway, and that is that agents don't do this over a guy who's decent to work for, and gives them the respect they deserve.
Whatever you think of the politics, Secret Service agents endure grueling, thankless hours for people across the political spectrum without complaint. Seriously, they don’t complain, at least in my experience.
So, when the discretion cracks, the person on the other end of it usually has something to do with why.
Trump's stomach-churning on-air garbage has left vulnerable Republicans horrified
We are, right now, dealing with a war overseas with Iran that has done so much damage to our country’s reputation, military, and economy that the ramifications, serious as they are now, will likely only get worse in the years ahead.
At home, gas prices are climbing. Food prices and mortgage rates are rising. Wildfires are burning across the West. Tornadoes have torn through states like Illinois and Indiana, already shattering annual records. Flooding has once again devastated communities in Texas, Kentucky, and other parts of the Midwest.
Smoke from Canadian wildfires has turned the skies over Chicago and New York City orange. Thousands of Americans are suffering through an unusually severe Cyclosporiasis outbreak courtesy of Trump budget cuts.
And yet, Donald Trump chose not to talk about the war, grocery bills, FEMA, or public health Thursday.
Nope. He used a primetime presidential address, normally reserved for war, tragedy, or moments of profound national consequence, to relitigate, for the umpteenth time, the 2020 election. The biggest lie he’s ever told to the American people that just won’t die.
His nincompoop acting DNI, Bill Pulte, in his short tenure, clearly “found, “coverd-up,” “hidden-from-you,” “shocking” “nefarious” tidbits about debunked election interference for Trump to stop America in its tracks.
It was as underwhelming as Trump’s Great American State Fair. And he looked like what he is — a spoiled, squirming child. Bottom-line, everyone was out to get him, wanted him to lose, they were “wise” to him.
It was all so discombobulated. He, of course, started talking about his achievements, which was akin to a Colbert monologue — full of jokes. Boy, do I miss Colbert. Then, he railed at China, the CIA, burn-bags, deep state, electric voting machines. It was all just too much. A complete rewind from the debunked conspiracies of the past.
Only someone so far removed from reality would drag the country back into a long-settled election simply because he still can't accept defeat. And simply because he just can’t get enough of trying to convince himself and everyone else that the election was rigged.
Gallingly, that about sums it up. And if any GOP U.S. senators were watching tonight, wavering on whether to support Trump’s prohibitive and discriminatory SAVE Act, they can now definitively vote no.
Yet somehow, despite everything happening in America and around the world, Trump once again succeeded in making the week about 2020. Much to the horror of Republicans trying to win the midterms, the country is once again talking about an election that ended nearly six years ago.
Besides Trump’s foolish primetime charade, another reason it’s back in the headlines is Jay Clayton, President Trump’s nominee for Director of National Intelligence, and his confirmation hearing before the Senate Intelligence Committee. Senator Jon Ossoff of Georgia spent his questioning time asking Clayton a simple factual question: Who won the 2020 presidential election?
Clayton wouldn’t give a straight answer. He kept falling back on the line that "Joe Biden was certified as the president," but repeatedly declined to simply say Biden won. Ossoff pressed him directly, asking whether it was humiliating to have to dodge a question everyone in the room already knew the answer to.
And the 2020 election popped up again during Todd Blanche’s Attorney General confirmation hearing yesterday. He gave the same non-answer as Clayton.
It’s stomach churning to watch middle-age men shove their nose up the wide-load derriere of an 80 year-old bad-tempered buffoon.
As we all know by now, the 2020 election has become a loyalty litmus test for anyone Trump wants confirmed. It’s the price of admission cowardly fools pay to get a seat at the table of power.
For you, dear and knowledgeable reader, I do not need to list the many ways the 2020 election was, in the words of Chris Krebs, who ran election security for Trump’s own Department of Homeland Security, the most secure election in American history. Krebs said flatly there was no evidence of vote-flipping by any foreign or domestic actor.
That should be the end of the story, but this convulsive obsession of Trump’s won’t end. Hopefully the courts and the thousands of voting jurisdictions around the country were watching Netflix, or NBC, ABC and CBS, all of which declined to carry the primetime speech.
A primetime presidential address is one of the rarest and most powerful tools any president possesses. It is reserved for war, national tragedy, catastrophic disasters, or moments that demand the country’s immediate and undivided attention.
By interrupting regular broadcasting, the President’s goal is ostensibly to unify the country’s attention, offer reassurance, project stability, and lay out vital, decisive action.
Ronald Reagan comforted a grieving nation after the Challenger Space Shuttle disaster. I remember that speech vividly. George W. Bush addressed the nation in primetime after the 9/11 attacks. I remember the sorrow and solidarity I felt after that broadcast.
So here’s the question worth asking: Why, with everything actually happening in this country right now, is Trump going on primetime to talk about 2020?
Well, the answer is simple. He’s a selfish, petulant, indignant, malcontent crybaby. He doesn’t give a damn about the war, your bills, your flooded house, your dry heaves, or your irritated stomach.
But if you didn’t know that by now, well, I don’t have much use for you.
I had to watch the speech tonight because I had to write this column, and now I’m having dry heaves and an irritated stomach and violent diarrhea, and that’s probably the most useful thing Donald Trump accomplished all night.
While wars rage overseas, towns flood, grocery bills climb, wildfires spread, and Americans worry about tomorrow, the President of the United States used one of the most powerful platforms in government to refight an election he lost nearly six years ago.
Millions of Americans tuned in because they assumed the President of the United States had something important to tell them. Instead, they got a 60-minute reminder that the only crisis Donald Trump still cares about is the one that ended in November 2020.
Trump's primetime speech will expose his biggest con yet — or its collapse
Tonight at nine o’clock Eastern, Donald Trump will look into a television camera and tell America he’s rescuing democracy. He teased the address to reporters this week, promising “really big news” about “free and fair elections” and adding that “it doesn’t get bigger.”
For once, he and I agree. It doesn’t get bigger.
An administration official told Reuters that the speech will center on newly declassified intelligence about the 2020 election and what the White House calls voting machine vulnerabilities open to foreign hackers; multiple election experts quoted in that same reporting warn he’s laying the groundwork to contest Republican losses this November.
To understand what we’ll actually be watching Thursday night, we have to go back to 1973, to a Manhattan night spot called Le Club, where a 27-year-old Donald Trump, freshly sued by the Justice Department for refusing to rent apartments to Black families, met the most feared lawyer in New York. It’s a story I tell in detail in The Last American President.
Roy Cohn had made his reputation as Joe McCarthy’s chief counsel, wrecking careers with accusations he never had to prove. His advice to young Trump, as Cohn’s own cousin later recalled it, was blunt: “You might be guilty; it doesn’t matter.” Don’t settle. Don’t apologize. Attack the accuser.
So instead of quietly signing the consent decree his father’s regular lawyers recommended, Trump called a press conference and countersued the federal government for $100 million. A judge tossed the countersuit, the Trumps eventually signed roughly the deal they’d been offered at the start, and Cohn declared total victory anyway.
He understood something that’s become the operating system of Donald Trump’s entire life: the court of public opinion matters more than any court of law, and a lie defended with absolute commitment will usually beat a truth defended halfheartedly.
Over their 13 years together, Cohn drilled three rules into his student: Attack, never defend. Deny everything, admit nothing. Claim victory no matter what actually happened.
When Jeff Sessions recused himself from the Russia investigation in 2017, Trump reportedly demanded of his aides, “Where’s my Roy Cohn?” He was mourning a fixer who’d been dead for three decades.
It took him eight more years, but he’s finally found his Roy Cohn. He’s found several of them, in fact, and he’s installed them at the Justice Department, the FBI, and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
That’s the machinery humming behind today’s speech. The acting Director of National Intelligence is now Bill Pulte, a nepo-baby real estate guy with no intelligence experience who referred Trump’s political enemies for criminal prosecution based on mortgage records he pulled from government databases, and who Democrats say was installed precisely to help Republicans rig the midterms.
A White House task force has been combing through thousands of pages of classified documents, timed to land in the middle of an election season. Federal agents have already raided the Fulton County elections office and carted off 700 boxes of 2020 ballots, something I covered here at the Hartmann Report earlier this year.
Steve Bannon has promised ICE agents at the polls come November, and Trump’s new Postmaster General has confirmed the Postal Service won’t deliver mail-in ballots from states that refuse to hand over sensitive voter data to the federal government. And Jay Clayton, Trump’s pick for permanent DNI, faced his Senate confirmation hearing Wednesday, one day before the speech, having already auditioned for the job by echoing Trump’s phony claims about “election integrity” on CNBC.
Standing in front of Mount Rushmore on the third of July, Trump told the crowd that if Senate Republicans kill the filibuster and pass his SAVE America Act, with its proof-of-citizenship, driver’s license-must-match-birth certificate (that kicks off millions of married women), and photo ID requirements, then Republicans “will not lose an election for 100 years.”
He tried holding a bipartisan housing affordability bill hostage to force the Senate’s hand, and now GOP leadership is trying to attach SAVE to the national security spending bill this week. Even Dan Abrams, hardly a flamethrower, opened his radio show this Monday by saying it’s time to admit the president of the United States is “trying to cheat” in the midterm elections.
One detail gives the whole con away: Tulsi Gabbard, before she resigned as DNI last month, commissioned a forensic analysis of voting machines seized in Puerto Rico. That analysis, Reuters reports, found security flaws but no evidence of hacking — none — and Gabbard’s own follow-up report recommending fixes has been sitting unreleased at the White House for months.
They went looking for proof of fraud, found none (but perhaps a way to hack machines in the future), buried the report that could have helped states harden their systems before November, and are now preparing a primetime address built on the fumes of the very investigation that came up empty.
Roy Cohn would be proud. Claim victory no matter what the facts say. When you’re in the wrong and on the defensive, lie and attack.
I lived in East Germany’s shadow for a year in the 1980s, working for an international relief organization in a small village a few miles from the border, and in 1986 I passed through Checkpoint Charlie into East Berlin. Most Americans probably don’t remember or even know that the DDR held elections; regular ones, with polling places and ballots and officially reported turnout levels that were typically north of 98 percent.
What they didn’t have was any possibility of a surprise. The regime had hollowed out every institution that could have made the outcome uncertain, so the election became theater, a ritual performed to legitimize a result already decided.
Putin ran East Germany’s KGB at the time, and he’s now Trump’s mentor. Authoritarians rarely abolish elections. They keep the shell and kill what’s inside it, and it appears that Trump is following the path Putin blazed at multiple levels.
So will it work here? There’s no secret button that flips vote totals: more than 98 percent of American ballots are cast in jurisdictions with paper records, and when Trump signed an executive order that would have forced the decertification of voting machines, a federal judge permanently blocked it based on the Constitution handing the running of elections to the states.
The weapon Trump and his corrupt GOP will use is chaos, not hacking: seizures of ballots and equipment, decertification fights, litigation that delays counts past deadlines, ICE vans parked outside polling places in Democratic neighborhoods, and a pre-built national narrative, launched tomorrow night, that gives every Republican candidate permission to refuse to concede when they lose.
David Becker, a former Justice Department voting rights attorney, thinks the document dumps will fall flat with most Americans, and the primary results this spring suggest voters aren’t buying what Trump’s selling.
But Roy Cohn’s method never needed a majority to believe the lie. It only needed enough confusion, enough delay, and enough intimidation to change who shows up and what gets counted. It’s worked for Donald Trump for 50 years.
Remember, though, how it ended for the teacher. Roy Cohn died in 1986, disbarred just weeks earlier for dishonesty, fraud, deceit, and misrepresentation, abandoned by nearly everyone he’d ever helped, including Trump, who dumped him when he got sick.
The con, in other words, always works right up until the moment it doesn’t.
Whether tonight marks the beginning of the biggest con in American history or the beginning of its collapse depends less on what Trump says than on what tens of millions of us do between now and the first Tuesday this coming November.
Congress is voting this week on whether to bolt the SAVE Act onto the national security spending bill, so call the Capitol switchboard at 202-224-3121 and tell your senators and representative where you stand, and don’t forget to mention Todd Blanche to your senators.
Check your voter registration right now at vote.org, because purges are already underway in Red states, and track what your own legislature is doing to protect or restrict your ballot at openstates.org.
Democracy has survived con men before, but only because ordinary Americans refused to become the mark. As Jefferson told us, “Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty…”
Copyright © 2026 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 |
Masthead
|
Privacy Policy
|
Manage Preferences
|
Debug Logs
For corrections contact
corrections@rawstory.com
, for support contact
support@rawstory.com
.
