Give me your tired, your poor, your white people
Nick Anderson is a Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist.
Nick Anderson is a Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist.
RFK Jr.: “Elizabeth Warren or Robert Reich saying that President Trump is on the side of the oligarchs, there has never been a president more willing to stand up to the oligarchs than President Donald Trump.”
I can take only so much sycophantic bulls--t from Trump’s Cabinet, but when RFK Jr. says there’s never been a president more willing to stand up to the oligarchs than President Donald Trump, I’ve got to respond.
It’s the oligarchy that put Trump into the presidency. He’s doing their work.
A half-century ago, when America had a large and growing middle class, those on the “left” wanted stronger social safety nets and more public investment in schools, roads, and research. Those on the “right” sought greater reliance on the free market.
But as power and wealth have moved to the top, everyone else — whether on the old right or the old left — has become disempowered and less secure.
Today the great divide is not between left and right. It’s between democracy and oligarchy.
The word “oligarchy” comes from the Greek words meaning rule (arche) by the few (oligos). It refers to a government of and by a few exceedingly rich people or families who control the major institutions of society — and therefore have most power over other peoples’ lives.
So far, Trump has picked 13 billionaires for his regime. It’s the wealthiest in history, including the richest person in the world. They and Trump are part of the American oligarchy.
America has experienced oligarchy twice before. Many of the men who founded America were slaveholding white oligarchs. At that time, the new nation did not have much of a middle class. Most white people were farmers, indentured servants, farm hands, traders, day laborers, and artisans. A fifth of the American population was Black, almost all of them enslaved.
A century later a new American oligarchy emerged comprised of men who amassed fortunes through their railroad, steel, oil, and financial empires — men such as J. Pierpont Morgan, John D. Rockefeller, Andrew Carnegie, Cornelius Vanderbilt, and Andrew Mellon. It was called the Gilded Age.
They ushered the nation into an industrial revolution that vastly expanded economic output. But they also corrupted government, brutally suppressed wages, generated unprecedented levels of inequality and urban poverty, pillaged rivals, shut down competitors, and made out like bandits — which is why they earned the sobriquet “robber barons.”
World War I and the Great Depression of the 1930s eroded most of the robber barons’ wealth, and much of their power was eliminated with the elections of Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1932 and Democratic majorities in the House and Senate.
America demanded fundamental reforms — a progressive income tax, corporate taxes, estate taxes, limits on the political power of large corporations, antitrust laws, laws enabling workers to form unions and requiring that employers negotiate with them, Social Security, the 40-hour workweek, unemployment insurance, civil rights and voting rights, and Medicare.
For the next half-century, the gains from growth were more widely shared, and democracy became more responsive to the needs and aspirations of average Americans. During these years America created the largest middle class the world had ever seen.
There was still much to do: wider economic opportunities for Black people, Latinos, and women, protection of the environment. Yet by almost every measure the nation was making progress.
Starting around 1980, a third American oligarchy emerged.
Since then, the median wage of the bottom 90 percent has stagnated. The share of the nation’s wealth owned by the richest 400 Americans has quadrupled while the share owned by the entire bottom half of America has dropped to 1.3 percent, according to an analysis by my Berkeley colleagues Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman.
The richest 1 percent of Americans now has more wealth than the bottom 90 percent combined.
The only other country with similarly high levels of wealth concentration is Russia, another oligarchy.
All this has been accompanied by a dramatic increase in the political power of the super-wealthy and an equally dramatic decline in the political influence of everyone else.
While the Biden administration sought to realign America with its ideals, it did not and could not accomplish nearly enough. Trump’s lies and demagoguery exploited the anger and frustration of much of America — creating the false impression he was a tribune of the working class and an antiestablishment hero — thereby allowing the oligarchy to triumph.
In 2022, Elon Musk spent $44 billion to buy Twitter and turn it into his own personal political megaphone. Then, in 2024, he spent $277 million to get Trump elected, also using Twitter (now X) to amplify pro-Trump, anti-Harris messages.
Trump then put Musk in charge of gutting government services in the name of “efficiency,” to make way for a giant tax cut whose benefits will go disproportionately to the oligarchy.
Unlike income or wealth, power is a zero-sum game. The more of it at the top, the less of it anywhere else.
The power shift across America is related to a tsunami of big money into politics. Corporate lobbying has soared. The voices of average people have been drowned out.
The American oligarchy is back, with a vengeance.
Not all wealthy people are culpable, of course. The abuse is occurring at the nexus of wealth and power, where those with great wealth use it to gain power and then utilize that power to accumulate more wealth. Today’s robber barons include Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, Peter Thiel, David Sacks, Charles Koch, Jeff Yass, Ken Griffin, and Rupert Murdoch.
They were on the way to destroying American democracy even before Trump. As oligarchs fill the coffers of political candidates and deploy platoons of lobbyists and public relations flaks, they buy off democracy. Oligarchs know that politicians won’t bite the hands that feed them.
As long as they control the purse strings, there will be no meaningful response to the failure of most people’s paychecks to rise, nor to climate change, nor racism, nor the soaring costs of health insurance, pharmaceuticals, college, and housing, because those are not the main concerns of the oligarchy.
The oligarchs want lower taxes, which is what Trump, Musk, and other oligarchs are planning — an extension of the 2017 Trump tax cut, with an estimated price tag of $5 trillion.
They want no antitrust enforcement to puncture the power of their giant corporations. Instead, their corporations will grow larger, able to charge consumers even more.
They want no meaningful constraint on Wall Street’s dangerous gambling addiction. The gambling will only increase.
They want no limits to CEO pay. Wall Street hedge fund and private equity managers will also rake in billions more. Government will dole out even more corporate subsidies, bailouts, and loan guarantees while eliminating protections for consumers, workers, and the environment.
It will become even more of a government for, of, and by the oligarchy.
The biggest divide in America today is not between “right” and “left,” or between Republicans and Democrats. It’s between democracy and oligarchy. The old labels — “right” and “left” — prevent most people from noticing they’re being shafted.
The propagandists and demagogues who protect the oligarchy stoke racial and ethnic resentments — describing human beings as illegal aliens, fueling hatred of immigrants, and spreading fears of communists and socialists.
This strategy gives the oligarchy freer rein: It distracts Americans from how the oligarchy is looting the nation, buying off politicians, and silencing critics. It causes Americans to hate each other so we don’t look upward and see where the wealth and power have really gone.
The way to overcome oligarchy is for the rest of us to join together and win America back, as we did in response to the oligarchy that dominated America’s last Gilded Age. We are beginning to do that.
The agenda ahead is simply stated, but it will not be easy to implement: We must get big money out of our politics. End corporate welfare and crony capitalism. Bust up monopolies. Stop voter suppression.
We must strengthen labor unions, give workers a stronger voice in their workplaces, create more employee-owned corporations, encourage worker cooperatives, fund and grow more state and local public banks, and develop other institutions of economic democracy.
This agenda is neither “right” nor “left.” It is the bedrock for everything else America must do.
It may seem an odd time in our history to suggest such reforms, but this is the best time. Trump and his oligarchy will inevitably overreach. They already are.
The lesson from the last Gilded Age is that when the corruption and ensuing hardship become so blatant that they offend the values of the majority of Americans, the majority will rise up and demand real, systemic change.
We are witnessing the stirrings of such an anti-oligarchic revolution right now. It is the silver lining on this horrific Trump storm cloud.
Robert Reich is a professor of public policy at Berkeley and former secretary of labor. His writings can be found at https://robertreich.substack.com/.
Pope Leo XIV just labeled AI one of the main threats facing humanity, saying it poses challenges to “human dignity, justice and labor.” He’s right, but it’s even worse than that: it represents, unless it’s rigorously regulated, a threat to democracy itself.
In every generation, the enemies of democracy change costumes, but their playbook remains eerily familiar. They lie, divide, intimidate, and exploit every available tool to consolidate power. In the 1930s it was radio, in the 2010s it was social media, and now, in 2025, the newest and most dangerous weapon in the authoritarian arsenal is artificial intelligence.
Make no mistake: AI is not just another technology. It is power, scaled. And in the hands of the far right, it becomes the most effective tool for dismantling democracy ever invented.
Authoritarians — whether MAGA-aligned in the United States or part of the global movement that includes Putin, Orbán, Modi, Netanyahu, and others — are not blind to the potential of AI. They understand it instinctively: its ability to simulate, to deceive, to surveil, and to dominate. While progressives and democratic institutions have scrambled to comprehend its implications, the authoritarians have already started weaponizing it with devastating efficiency.
Let’s look at the mechanisms.
AI can now generate millions of personalized political messages in seconds, each calibrated to manipulate a voter’s specific fears or biases. It can create entire fake news outlets, populate them with AI-generated journalists, and flood your social feed with content that looks real, sounds real, and feels familiar, all without a single human behind it. Imagine the power of Joseph Goebbels’ propaganda machine, but with superintelligence behind the wheel and zero friction. That’s where we’re heading.
And that’s just the beginning.
Authoritarian regimes can — and already are — using AI to surveil and intimidate their citizens. What China has perfected with facial recognition and loyalty scoring, MAGA-aligned figures in the U.S. are watching closely, eager to adopt and adapt. Right-wing sheriffs and local governments could soon use AI to track protestors, compile digital dossiers, and “predict” criminal behavior in communities deemed politically undesirable.
If the government knows not just where you are, but what you’re thinking, organizing, or reading — and it can fabricate “evidence” to match — freedom of thought becomes a quaint memory.
This isn’t theoretical. In 2024, we saw AI-generated robocalls impersonating Joe Biden telling voters to stay home (and millions did). In the next cycle, we may see entire election campaigns waged by AI bots masquerading as voters, influencers, and even public officials.
Trump, during the 2024 election campaign, reposted a fake AI image of Taylor Swift endorsing him, over her objection; many believed she’d become a Trump supporter. As the Carnegie Endowment for Peace noted:
“Meanwhile, deepfake audio clips of British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Slovakia’s opposition head, Michal Šimečka, ignited social media controversies when they spread rapidly before fact-checkers exposed them as fabrications. The destructive power of deepfakes also hit home in Türkiye when a presidential candidate withdrew from the May 2023 election after explicit AI-generated videos went viral. In Argentina’s October 2023 presidential election, both leading candidates deployed deepfakes by creating campaign posters and materials that mocked their opponents—tactics that escalated into full-blown AI memetic warfare to sway voters.”
The goal often isn’t just to win; it’s to delegitimize the democratic process itself. Because once trust is broken — once people believe that “both sides lie” or that “you can’t believe anything anymore” — then strongmen step into the void with promises of order, purity, and salvation.
And when they do, AI will be there to enforce it.
Imagine a future where police departments outsource their decision-making to “neutral” algorithms, algorithms coded with the biases of their creators like Musk is doing by training Grok on Xitter. Where AI-driven systems deny permits, benefits, or even due process based on behavioral profiles. Where loyalty to the regime is rewarded with access, and dissent is flagged by invisible systems you can’t appeal.
That’s not democracy. That’s techno-feudalism, wrapped in a red-white-and-blue flag.
It’s already happening in Bangladesh, Colombia, Ethiopia, Guatemala, the Philippines, and Thailand, according to the Carnegie Endowment. They add:
“In the EU’s Eastern neighborhood, countries like Georgia, Moldova, Romania, and Ukraine face a deluge of hybrid threats and AI-generated disinformation campaigns aimed at destabilizing societies, disrupting electoral processes, and derailing people’s democratic aspirations.”
If we allow the far right to continue merging political power with AI without guardrails, we will see the rise of a system where freedom is algorithmically rationed.
Elections will still happen, but outcomes will be massaged. Dissent will still exist, but only in controlled pockets, easy to monitor and suppress. History books will be written, edited, and distributed by code optimized for obedience. The “news” will be whatever the regime’s AI decides you should see.
This is not science fiction. It is the logical endpoint of unregulated, authoritarian-aligned artificial intelligence.
So what do we do?
We must treat AI regulation as a democratic survival issue. That means:
— Banning the use of deepfakes in political ads.
— Enforcing transparency on algorithmic decision-making.
— Creating unbiased public, open-source alternatives to corporate-controlled models.
— Creating disinformation infrastructure as we would biological or nuclear weapons that are not just dangerous, but potentially civilization-ending.
— Demanding that social media outlets publish their algorithms so we can see how we’re being manipulated.
And we must do it now.
Because history teaches us that once authoritarianism takes root, it rarely gives up power voluntarily. The longer we wait, the more embedded, autonomous, and intelligent these systems become. We’re not just fighting bad actors anymore: we’re fighting machines trained to think like them.
The battle for democracy in the age of AI will not be won with slogans or optimism alone. It will take law, oversight, courage — and above all, vigilance. As always, democracy is not a spectator sport. If we want to preserve the sacred right of self-governance, we must recognize the existential threat in front of us and act with urgency.
This time, the fight isn’t just against the usual suspects.
This time, the algorithm is watching.
Donald Trump has been lying to us ever since he came down that escalator. He just never stops lying because as a lifelong con man, it’s all he knows how to do.
He’s still insisting he won the 2020 election, despite having lost by about 7 million votes and being wiped out in the Electoral College. He lied at the State of the Union about having a mandate to cut Medicaid, as Rep. Al Green (D-TX) pointed out. Along with over 100 other lies he told that day. And now he’s lying about his trade deals with the UK and other governments. Every single day he adds to the pile of lies he’s inflicting on the American people and the world.
Science, it turns out, explains why this works for him.
Not the science of elections: the science of propaganda.
New findings from psychologists at universities in California and Georgia published in the journal Cognitive Research show that the more often a statement — regardless of its truthfulness — is repeated, the more emphatically it’s believed.
The researchers noted:
“Repeated information is often perceived as more truthful than new information. This finding is known as the illusory truth effect, and it is typically thought to occur because repetition increases processing fluency. Because fluency and truth are frequently correlated in the real world, people learn to use processing fluency as a marker for truthfulness.”
While modern science is affirming this truism, it’s been in use a long time. In the past century, for example, President Franklin D. Roosevelt called out Republicans for using what we today call the Big Lie around several issues. Running for re-election in 1944, he said:
“The opposition in this year has already imported into this campaign a very interesting thing, because it is foreign. They have imported the propaganda technique invented by the dictators abroad. Remember, a number of years ago, there was a book, Mein Kampf, written by Hitler himself.
“The technique was all set out in Hitler's book — and it was copied by the aggressors of Italy and Japan. According to that technique, you should never use a small falsehood; always a big one, for its very fantastic nature would make it more credible — if only you keep repeating it over and over and over again.”
Back then Republicans were lying that Democrats had caused the Republican Great Depression (as it was called until the 1950s) and that FDR had “failed” to adequately prepare America for war with Germany or Japan (while Republican after Republican took to the floor of Congress to tell us, before the war, that “we can do business with Hitler”).
Now Trump’s lies (like about the election, immigrants, and what Elon Musk is up to) are parroted daily by Republican politicians and usually echoed in the media without pushback. After all, Trump reportedly slept with a collection of Hitler’s speeches by his bedside: he would be fluent in Hitler’s Big Lie strategy.
Besides the addition of Trump’s lies, Republican lies haven’t changed a lot since FDR’s era, although they’re more focused and now repeated daily by thousands of rightwing websites, bloggers, podcasts, Fox “News,” and talk radio shows.
Over the past 44 years, Republican billionaires have built an extraordinary nationwide media propaganda machine. Their goal was directed towards justifying tax cuts for the morbidly rich and the deregulation of polluting industries, but now it’s been taken over by Trump acolytes promoting, among other lies, the idea the Democrats torture children and drink their blood.
The “useful idiots” in this scheme have been the American corporate and billionaire-owned media, who dutifully echo or leave unchallenged the GOP’s regular lies.
One of the Republicans most egregious lies — that America is evenly split 50/50 between Republicans and Democrats and on the issues of the day — is constantly repeated on the political Sunday shows. Always without a single word of pushback from the show’s host.
While the Senate may be more-or-less split 50/50, Democrats in the Senate represent over 40 million more Americans than do Republicans. And on issues like tax cuts for billionaires, the right to unionize, access to Medicare/Medicaid, climate change, the right to abortion, privatizing Social Security, drug prices, Medicaid expansion, free college, and the minimum wage Americans are overwhelmingly on the side of Democrats.
So how did so many Americans end up believing the many lies that are daily pushed by the GOP?
In a word: repetition, just like the science shows works. Here are a few of their greatest hits, with each followed by my rebuttal:
In a remarkable study published by The London School of Economics, looking at 18 wealthy OECD countries over 50 years, the researchers discovered, unambiguously:
“We find that major reforms reducing taxes on the rich lead to higher income inequality as measured by the top 1% share of pre-tax national income. The effect remains stable in the medium term. In contrast, such reforms do not have any significant effect on economic growth and unemployment.”
In other words, tax cuts for the rich make the rich richer and throw the nation into debt, but otherwise have no measurable effect on the economy.
Ever since Ronald Reagan, Republicans have been assuring us that if we just give more money to the “job creators,” they’ll use it to open new factories and raise wages. In fact, the morbidly rich simply put that extra money into their offshore accounts and money bins.
In fact, in the 44 years since Reagan started the practice of massive Republican tax cuts for the richest Americans, there has been a $50 trillion transfer of wealth from America’s working class into the money bins of our morbidly rich.
The idea that tax cuts for the rich and corporations would produce prosperity was a lie from the beginning and still is, but Republicans are still repeating it after nearly 50 years of disastrous experience with neoliberal Reaganomics.
In fact, immigrants — legal and undocumented — are far less likely to commit crimes than American citizens. After all, who wants to either get deported or blow up their chances of becoming a citizen of the country they’ve taken such huge and often deadly chances to reach?
And the statistics aren’t even close. In a massive study funded by grants from the National Science Foundation and the National Institute of Justice, published by the University of Wisconsin at Madison, scientists discovered American citizens are 200% to 400% more likely to commit violent felonies against persons, drug crimes, and felony property crimes than immigrants, regardless of their immigration status.
But that won’t stop rightwing media from hyping every exception-to-the-rule when an immigrant is caught committing a crime. Lies, after all, are the coin of their realm.
The minimum wage was established in 1938 and has been raised 22 times. If there had ever been — in all that time — even a single year when inflation increases could be tied to increases in the minimum wage, every Republican in America would have the year memorized.
“You don’t want what happened in 1958 to happen ever again!” they’d warn us while wagging fingers in our faces. Except there is not even one single example of an increase in the minimum wage increasing inflation, which is why they never cite a single statistic or year.
When researchers decided to seriously dig into the topic, they found that a massive 10% increase in the minimum wage may have as much as a 0.1% — one-tenth-of-one-percent, or ten cents on a $100 product — impact on inflation, but that’s never been recorded in American history. Wages simply aren’t that large a part of the price of most goods and even most services.
This is a favorite of the multi-billion-dollar union-busting industry to roll out in their mandatory “reeducation” sessions with captive workers who are considering voting for unionization. It’s a complete lie.
Unlike workers’ actual bosses, whose compensation typically goes up with profits, union “bosses” are simply employees of heavily regulated nonprofit organizations (unions) who work on a salary. They earn just a small fraction of what the actual corporate bosses take from the companies they’re trying to unionize.
When they’re successful, however, union bosses do reduce corporate profits by forcing companies to give their workers better pay and benefits. Which is why corporations are willing to pay millions of dollars a day, in some cases, to bring in these high-powered law firms to intimidate workers.
This one depends on how you define “corrupt.” If you mean that dead people are voting or people are voting multiple times in multiple states, that’s so rare as to compete with the Loch Ness Monster for headlines.
After all, with millions of dollars and over a hundred lawyers and lawmakers, Republicans tried in 60 courtrooms (including the U.S. Supreme Court) to prove even a single case of election fraud that may have affected the outcome of the 2020 election: they failed every time.
On the other hand, if you define “corrupt” as Republican elections officials purging millions of voters — most people of color, students, city-dwellers, and the working poor — from the voting rolls, then maybe there’s some truth to it. But that’s not the line Republicans are selling.
This is one of the deadliest lies Republicans promote. A massive study published in The Annals of Internal Medicine found that having a gun in the home doubles the risk of residents of that home being victims of homicide and triples the risk of successful suicide.
Donald Trump speaks at the NRA convention in 2019. (Screenshot/YouTube)
Nonetheless, the big gun manufacturers and their Russian-supported National Rifle Association shower millions on Republican politicians all across America, so now guns have become the top cause of death among children here, something that’s never happened in any developed country, anytime in history, anywhere else in the world.
America now has about 120 guns per 100 people, while in most other developed countries the ratio is around 20 guns per 100 people. In many countries — Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan, for example — it’s fewer than one gun per 100 people.
We are awash in blood and gun violence because of this Republican lie.
This lie is vigorously promoted by the Christian nationalist movement, led by multi-millionaire preachers and televangelists who are not only profiting from it but also have acquired considerable political power through it.
America, in fact, was the first democracy in the world that was founded in an entirely and explicitly secular fashion. The only prominent Founder who promoted the idea of America as a Christian nation was “Give me liberty or give me death” Patrick Henry, who was Virginia’s largest slaveholder and refused to sign the Constitution when it was finished in the fall of 1787.
Jefferson, Franklin, Rush, Washington and numerous others among the Founders didn’t even consider themselves Christians, and those who did — most notably John Adams and James Madison — were outspoken about the dangers of mixing religion and politics.
President Madison’s first veto, in fact, was to strike down a law that gave a DC church money to run a poorhouse. He said in his veto message that it would strike a bad precedent for the American government to give any money whatsoever to any church for a function that government should run itself.
Madison, who was a regular churchgoer (Jefferson attended, too, because until the Revolution the law in Virginia required church membership and attendance as a prerequisite for running for political office), was concerned that government money would corrupt the religion he loved; Jefferson was worried that if “priests” ever became politicians it would lead to the ruin of the republic.
The two debated the issue of which was the greatest danger to America regularly: it turns out both were right.
This is so facially absurd it shouldn’t even require mentioning, but there is literally not a single elected Republican at the federal level (at least that I know of) who will contradict it.
Like with the gun industry, the fossil fuel industry pays their politicians very well, and, since the Supreme Court legalized political bribery with their Citizens United decision and its predecessors, that money has worked to hold the GOP in the blood-stained clutches of the industry.
And now these Republican lies about climate change threaten all life on Earth.
So much happened during the last Trump administration that Americans can be forgiven for forgetting that Trump, in 2019, promised Chinese President Xi Jinping that he wouldn’t object if Xi brutally crushed the Hong Kong independence movement.
Trump was working on getting Chinese trademarks for his daughter Ivanka’s fashion line and other Ivanka-branded items (including coffins, voting machines, and almost any other category available) so, as CNN reported on October 4, 2019:
“The remarkable pledge to the Chinese leader is a dramatic departure from decades of US support for human rights in China and shows just how eager Trump is to strike a deal with Beijing…”
Trump’s so-called “trade war” with China was a joke. He imposed a few cosmetic tariffs that backfired and the Chinese didn’t take seriously because they were done by executive order rather than an act of Congress.
After hubby Jared got $2 billion for selling America out to Saudi Arabia, Ivanka seems to have lost interest in her business dealings in China. But in the meantime, the democracy movement in Hong Kong was completely crushed and its advocates are now dead or in prison thanks to Trump.
Every one of these lies, among others, are vigorously promoted by GOP-aligned media.
Their constant repetition has led average Republicans to fervently believe them, to the detriment of both the United States and, particularly with climate change, the future of life on Earth.
And now Trump has rolled out a new Big Lie that the media is obediently repeating: surrendering Ukraine to Russia will bring about “peace.” It’s probably the most despicable lie he’s promoted in decades.
FDR was right to call out the Republican Party for their Big Lie strategy back in the day. Tragically, he was 80 years too early for today’s Americans to realize the long, deep roots of the modern GOP’s propaganda strategy.
Over the past 40 years, our media has been largely complicit, echoing these Republican Big Lies. It’s well past time for American media to take its responsibility to present the truth seriously.
Friends,
On Sunday night, the U.S. announced that it is cutting tariffs on Chinese imports from 145 percent to 30 percent, for 90 days, and that China is dropping tariffs on U.S. goods from 125 percent to 10 percent, also for 90 days.
The stock market soared on the news. (Anyone with inside knowledge of the deal made a killing.)
But what’s the ultimate goal here? What will happen over the next 90 days?
It’s impossible to know what’s in Trump’s mind (other than an insatiable thirst for money and power), but Trump trade and manufacturing adviser Peter Navarro says the “bigger picture is restoring the American manufacturing base.”
In 1970, more than a quarter of American workers held jobs in the manufacturing sector. Today, it’s only about 8%. The Trump regime says sweeping tariffs will reverse this decades-long decline.
Trump also promises to revive America’s coal industry. Last week he issued an executive order to rescind regulations limiting coal development. He even ordered federal agencies to stop considering the economic damage caused by coal and other carbon emissions when writing regulations. And he’s doing whatever he can to destroy green energy — solar and wind.
Um … manufacturing? Coal mining?
These sorts of jobs won’t make America great again. They’ll make American workers sick, injured, and killed on the job again.
I was secretary of labor. I saw close up how awful most of these jobs are. I met workers who had lost limbs in manufacturing jobs because machines they were cleaning or repairing accidentally started up. Others I met suffered carpal tunnel injuries from repetitive motions on assembly lines.
Child labor was — and still is — a pervasive problem. So, too, with dangerous sweatshops crammed with people working for subminimum wages (if they’re lucky enough to be paid at all).
And mining? I met mine workers with black lung disease from exposure to coal dust. Despite being on the decline after the 1970s, black lung has been on the rise for two decades. Changes in mining technology have let mine owners dig deeper, exposing miners to even more highly toxic silica.
The reason many working-class Americans want manufacturing and mining to return is not that they loved the work. In most cases it was grueling and dangerous or mind-numbingly boring.
It’s because that work paid far better than the service jobs in fast-food and retail outlets, hospitals, and hotels that many have been forced to take in their absence.
And the reason those manufacturing and mining jobs paid far better was that they were unionized. Unions gave workers in manufacturing and mining the bargaining leverage they needed to force employers to offer better pay (along with more job security and safer working conditions).
But since the Reagan years, corporations have been busting unions. In the 1960s, a third of all workers in the private sector were unionized. Today, just 6 percent are.
And if there’s one thing Trump and his cronies don’t want, it’s unions giving workers more bargaining power. He has gutted the National Labor Relations Board, eviscerated OSHA, and is filling the Department of Labor with corporate stooges.
So even if it were possible to restore manufacturing and mining to America — even if we stopped foreign trade and forced American consumers to pay enormous sums for stuff made here, even if we filled the atmosphere with carbon, even if we prevented new technologies (including artificial intelligence) from replacing manufacturing workers and miners — the American working class would be no better off if their pay is still in the cellar.
A return of manufacturing and mining jobs won’t make Americans great again. Good-paying jobs will.
The easiest and best ways to raise the pay of working-class Americans are to (1) strengthen unions, (2) raise the minimum wage (which hasn’t been increased since 2009), (3) expand the Earned Income Tax Credit (a wage subsidy) for lower-income workers, and (4) institute a universal basic income.
Will Trump do any of these things? No chance in hell.
Robert Reich is a professor of public policy at Berkeley and former secretary of labor. His writings can be found at https://robertreich.substack.com/.
Trump is overplaying his hand.
Not just by usurping the powers of Congress and ignoring Supreme Court rulings. Not just abducting people who are legally in the United States but have put their name to opinion pieces Trump doesn’t like and trucking them off to “detention” facilities. Not just using the Justice Department for personal vengeance. Not just unilaterally deciding how much tariff tax American consumers will have to pay on almost everything they buy.
Polls show all these are tanking Trump’s popularity.
But one thing almost all Americans are firmly against — even many loyal Trumpers — is bribery. And Trump is taking bigger and bigger bribes.
Yesterday it was reported that he’s accepting a luxury Boeing 747-8 plane worth at least $400 million from the Qatari royal family, for use during his presidency and for his personal use afterward.
Trump just can’t resist. He’s been salivating over the plane for months. It’s bigger and newer than Air Force One — and so opulently configured that it’s known as “a flying palace.” (No report on whether it contains a golden toilet.)
Apparently he’s been talking about the plane for months. In February, he toured it while it was parked at Palm Beach International Airport.
He’s tried to redecorate the White House into a palace but that’s not nearly as satisfying as flying around the world in one, especially once he’s left the White House (assuming he will).
Attorney General Pam Bondi said it’s perfectly legal for him to accept such a bribe, er, gift.
Hello?
The U.S. Constitution clearly forbids officers of the United States from taking gifts from foreign governments. It’s called the “emoluments clause.” (See Article I, Section 9.)
Anyone viewing Bondi as a neutral judge of what’s legal and what’s not when it comes to Trump can’t be trusted to be a neutral judge of Bondi. Recall that she represented Trump in a criminal proceeding. Presumably he appointed her attorney general because he knew she’d do and say anything he wanted.
Oh, and she used to lobby for Qatar.
So, what does Qatar get in return for the $400 million plane? What’s the quid for the quo?
This week Trump takes the first overseas trip of his second presidency. He’ll land in Saudi Arabia on Tuesday, followed by a visit to Qatar, and then to the United Arab Emirates (U.A.E).
That’s a big boost for Qatar right there.
Trump also just did what Qatar has been wanting done for years — announcing that the Persian Gulf (as it’s been known since at least 550 B.C.) will henceforth be known as the Arabian Gulf.
Trump’s company has just announced a new golf resort in Qatar, reportedly partnering with a company owned by the royal family.
Qatar is also pushing the Trump regime to lift sanctions on Syria.
The payback could be any number of things. The only certainty is that you and I and other Americans won’t necessarily benefit.
This week’s trip to Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the U.A.E. is as much a personal business trip for Trump and his family businesses as a diplomatic trip.
Eric Trump, who officially runs the family business, has just announced plans for a Trump-branded hotel and tower in Dubai, part of the U.A.E.
The Trump family’s developments in the Middle East depend on a Saudi-based real estate company with close ties to the Saudi government. Saudi Arabia has a long list of pressing matters before the United States, including requests to buy F-35 fighter jets and gain access to nuclear power technology.
Trump’s family crypto firm, World Liberty Financial, announced that its so-called “stablecoin” — with Trump’s likeness all over it — will be used by the U.A.E. to make a $2 billion business deal with Binance, the largest crypto exchange in the world. The deal will generate hundreds of millions of dollars more for the Trump family.
I had assumed that Trump’s undoing would be his unquenchable thirst for power. It may yet be, but I’m beginning to think his insatiable greed will do him in. America’s Grifter-in-Chief knows no bounds.
Robert Reich is a professor of public policy at Berkeley and former secretary of labor. His writings can be found at https://robertreich.substack.com/.
Why are right-wingers so scared of ideas?
Are their minds so weak that mere exposure to certain books will infect them with what Elon Musk calls “the woke mind virus”?
They don’t want you inoculated against measles, but they’re doing their damnedest to inoculate Americans against knowledge.
Novels upset them; poetry upsets them; science upsets them; history upsets them; art upsets them; questioning of authority upsets them.
Universities really, really upset them — all that interrogating norms; all that challenging orthodoxy; all that critical inquiry.
To that end, Donald Trump’s going to war with Harvard, Columbia, Johns Hopkins, even Penn, his alma mater.
Ron DeSantis beat him to it: The governor’s been trying for years to regulate speech, impose restrictions on what teachers can teach, and decree which books the state of Florida finds “acceptable.”
While he’s had some success in K-12, enabling Moms for Liberty and their ilk in their book-banning crusade and threatening educators with dire consequences if they mention the existence of gay and trans people, some judges, unsurprisingly partial to the First Amendment, have slapped him down.
DeSantis, nothing if not energetic in his rage, is now determined to shield our precious college students from Dangerous Thoughts.
Choose the administrators. Choose the presidents. Control the universities.
The University of Florida needs a new dean of Liberal Arts and Sciences — with 40 majors and more than 10,000 students, it’s the largest college at UF.
They got as far as interviewing four highly qualified candidates: two mathematicians — UF’s own Kevin P. Knudson and Maggy Tomova, dean of UCF’s College of Science; Ryan Schroeder, dean of Georgia Southern’s College of Behavioral and Social Sciences; and Robert Brinkmann, a professor of Geology and dean of Liberal Arts and Science at Northern Illinois University.
But two weeks ago, the governor blew up the search. Demanded UF stop it.
Seems the finalists, admired scholars and seasoned leaders, are crypto-Marxist, Trump-hating eggheads bent on destroying America.
An anonymous social media account calling itself “Commies on Campus” ran shrieking to Bryan Griffin, DeSantis’ communications director, calling all four “radical DEI progressives.”
The Commies posted slick, selectively edited videos of candidate interviews, slamming Brinkmann for stating the obvious: “We have people in charge of things in our country that don’t have any business being in charge of those things,” and Knudson for being proud that as head of UF’s Honors Program “we were able to increase the number of African American and Hispanic students in the program.”
As if that’s somehow shameful.
Kent Fuchs, UF’s invertebrate of an interim president, sent out a memo pretending “terminating the search” was the only thing to do, what with the university also in the middle of hiring a permanent president.
Fuchs has never said no to DeSantis.
He does as he’s told, facilitating the hiring of our data-challenged surgeon general at UF’s medical school and trying to stop professors from testifying on voting rights.
Academic freedom doesn’t matter; the professors’ expertise might pose a “conflict of interest to the executive branch of the state of Florida.”
As if serving the interests of the executive branch should somehow be the mission of a university.
UF remains a distinguished institution, though slipping in national rankings of public universities. It was No. 5 a couple of years ago but is now No. 7.
Still pretty good, especially given DeSantis’ obsessive attacks on higher education in the state.
But allowing some trifling X account to dictate policy at Florida’s flagship university won’t exactly burnish UF’s reputation.
Whoever the “Commies on Campus” may be, they weren’t paying attention in political science class.
They call anything they don’t like “communist:” LGBTQ, feminism, secularism, programs for the poor, addressing the climate crisis, taxing the rich, giving anyone without one of those useful White Man Cards a fair shot in life.
“Communist” is MAGA’s all-purpose insult.
Read a book, kids: While real live commies like the ones in North Korea, Cuba, or China may think religion is the opiate of the masses and rich folks (except the leaders of these countries) shouldn’t exist, they’re not keen on stuff like feminism, they persecute gay people, and they sure as hell don’t favor DEI.
Ask the Uighurs.
Yet DeSantis, a man educated beyond his intelligence, takes what these nameless chuckleheads say at face value.
There are in fact a number of well-regarded Marxist scholars at American universities. Yale, the governor’s alma mater, has a reading group studying Marxism and Cultural Theory.
Nevertheless, DeSantis emerged from the Red Menace of New Haven untainted.
He’s also unimpeded by understanding what universities are supposed to do.
An academic’s job is to research everything from the Roman Republic to astrophysics to Norse sagas to gene structure to the ideology of slavery to economic and political systems, which requires reading across the spectrum from “Das Kapital” to “The Road to Serfdom“ and presenting their data and knowledge to students.
We call this “education.”
It’s embarrassing how MAGAs deem Hungarian (or Putinist) authoritarianism OK, even admirable, while “communist” is the gravest of insults and socialism is a mortal sin.
Perhaps they’re unaware socialism is viewed favorably by around 36% of Americans.
That’s almost the same number who say they strongly support Donald Trump.
The point is, ideas are not viruses: Mere exposure to communist thought doesn’t turn you into a communist, any more than reading James Baldwin’s “Giovanni’s Room” makes you gay, any more than reading “The Wealth of Nations” ensures you’ll become a rabid capitalist.
But MAGAs don’t do high-level thinking: It makes their heads hurt. They simply react.
Loudly. Ignorantly. Irrationally.
Commies on Campus now has a new project: trying to influence who will become the new president of the University of Florida.
UF has announced a finalist.
One finalist. Chosen in secret.
He is Dr. Santa Ono, a Canadian American immunologist.
The Commies say he’s some kind of woke monster who, as president of the University of Michigan, created “THE LARGEST #DEI EMPIRE in the country.”
Their evidence? Christopher Rufo, the febrile New College trustee last heard claiming immigrants were eating cats and dogs, calls Ono “left-wing” and points to a 2023 commencement address in which he made the unimpeachable statement, “The climate crisis is the existential challenge of our time.”
Florida gubernatorial candidate and Trump acolyte U.S. Rep. Byron Donalds, never losing a chance to ingratiate himself with MAGA voters, demands UF “go back to the drawing board.”
Donalds’ hair is on fire because Ono once said, “Racism is one of America’s original sins.”
Deep breath, people: 1. Both of Ono’s statements are perfectly true; and 2. Rufo, Donalds, and the Commies need to update their intel.
Ono has changed his tune. No longer a champion of diversity, he’s now singing from the DeSantis Hymnal, declaring himself in “total alignment” with the governor’s anti-woke crusade.
“I have the same views as this governor,” Ono said.
During his three years at Michigan (the shortest tenure of any president in the university’s history), Ono initially won praise for prioritizing sustainability and anti-racist projects. Students say he was personable and accessible.
Then Trump happened, and, like too many university administrators, he bent the knee, shutting UM’s DEI office, cracking down on student protest, and creating, as one faculty member said, “a surveillance state.”
Seems he deployed plainclothes officers police to trail and photograph people on UM’s campus.
No wonder DeSantis likes this guy.
Santa is a real scholar, a proper scientist, with academic and administrative qualifications that could have been a great fit at UF. He’s streets ahead of DeSantis’ last hand-picked president, the empty, in-over-his-head Ben Sasse, whose one discernable talent was spending other people’s money.
In a Trump-free world, Ono might have become the leader who could protect the institution. He might have pushed back against the governor’s determination to reduce Florida’s universities to football factories with libraries curated by the likes of Christopher Rufo and courses insisting on the divine greatness of America.
Alas, Ono has made clear that’s not him, not anymore.
This is what you get when one incurious, anti-intellectual, and perpetually angry man chooses university presidents in secret.
This is what you get when there’s only one finalist.
Yes, the trustees officially make the job offer, but there’s no chance they’d hire someone DeSantis didn’t like.
This is the reality of higher ed in Florida today.
FIU has one finalist for president. No shock that it’s DeSantis’ former lieutenant governor and Interim President Jeannette Nuñez.
In its presidential search, FAU announced three finalists. Maybe this would be a real contest?
Two had Ph.Ds. and solid higher ed experience. One was a Republican political hack.
You can guess who got the gig.
Florida A&M, still in the process of choosing a president, has four finalists.
Promising, right?
There were initially three on the shortlist, all with extensive university experience. Then a fourth candidate, a woman with ties to top Republicans, appeared.
She’s Marva Johnson, a communications company executive, appointed by then-Gov. Rick Scott to the Florida Board of Education and chosen by Ron DeSantis for the Florida Scholars Academy Board of Trustees.
Commies on Campus have not yet weighed in on this one.
FAMU alumni say she’d be a terrible choice, calling her “a plant” and likening her to a Trojan Horse hostile to the university’s mission.
But what the alumni want, and what the university wants, probably won’t matter.
What DeSantis wants matters.
As everyone in the unfree state of Florida knows, all animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.
We are running out of time, folks, because as I am typing this, the groundwork is being laid by the most lawless, corrupt administration in United States history to come after our right to due process, and incinerate the most elemental piece of a democracy: freedom.
That all this is being spearheaded by an America-attacking, convicted felon is an incomprehensible and brutal paradox.
Before continuing, I ask you have a look at this image I chose to accompany today’s piece:
When the White House isn’t trolling us with pictures of the America-attacking Trump posing as the Pope, it is busy hanging on its taxpayer-funded website lethal Executive Orders (EO) that could have very easily been written by Adolph Hitler in 1939.
Strengthening and unleashing …
Of course, the use of the word “unleashing” is very intentional here because the literal definition of the word is “to suddenly release a violent force that cannot be controlled.”
I am ashamed I didn't make more out of this EO when it was released, because for some reason I thought our mess of a media would have properly sounded the hair-raising alarms that fascism had officially parked itself just off our coast and was ready to be unleashed to storm ashore at any moment.
Because when, not if, that moment arrives, it might already be too late.
I warned you just days before the inauguration the America-attacking Trump was coming for our military, and then US ... It was not matter of if Trump would use our military and law enforcement officers against us, it was just a matter of when.
Well when looks to be in the next couple of months or so, because stuffed in this grotesque EO is this:
“Within 60 days of the date of this order, the Attorney General shall review all ongoing Federal consent decrees, out-of-court agreements, and post-judgment orders to which a State or local law enforcement agency is a party and modify, rescind, or move to conclude such measures that unduly impede the performance of law enforcement functions.”
Basically what this is saying through all the lawyered bulls--t is that the America-attacker is weaponizing the Justice Department — which by the way is supposed to work for US, not him — to infiltrate local law enforcement shops and give them all sorts of ungodly powers bestowed by King Crud to wreck the lives of whomever they want, whenever they want.
So the same party that falsely claims to believe in states’ rights where things like abortion and voting rights are concerned is now telling us loudly and clearly that when it comes to law and order the felon in the White House will make the first and final call.
In others words, you just can’t believe a word that comes out of their dirty mouths. They will do what they want when they want, and justify it as the king’s consent. If you don’t like it, you can either go to hell, or to jail.
As usual The Nation’s Elie Mystal lays out the ramifications of this better than just about anybody, so I am going to borrow from the tremendous piece he penned a week ago on this sinister EO to give you a graphic illustration of what we are literally staring down the barrel at in the coming days and weeks:
“I cannot help but understand this order through its potential impacts on my lived experience. Let’s say a cop pulls me over for driving-while-Black. After he hops out of his M1-Abrams tank, he uses a military grade stun-gun on me because I gave him the side-eye while searching for my vehicle registration. I “resist” by saying things such as “Ow!” or “What the hell!” and he proceeds to beat me to within an inch of my life.
“I’d want him to face criminal charges, but the prosecutor doesn’t want to take the risk. Even though I have a good case, they’re worried that if they press charges against the officer, they will face charges from the Department of Justice. Even if I can marshal considerable public pressure to get the prosecutor to file charges, the cop is now being defended, for free, by Brad Karp at Paul, Weiss or some other wealthy Biglaw attorney who has decided to be complicit with fascism. The trial proceeds, but let’s say I win (because corporate attorneys are not necessarily the best courtroom litigators). Even then, any damages I receive for being Tiananmen Square’d by the racist cop are covered by the government. The cop returns to the force soon after, because any accountability measure like a consent decree is also no longer available during the Trump administration.”
Go ahead, read that one again, because it is terrifying.
And if after reading that chilling, and all-too-realistic scenario again, you are thinking what I was: IF we are able to make it to 2028 and actually have something resembling a presidential election — something I am admittedly very dubious about — that a Democratic president will restore order. Well, Mystal very rightfully isn’t so sure:
“Like all of Trump’s executive orders, this one can be rescinded by the next president (if we are allowed to have one). But unlike some of the others, I don’t necessarily trust that a future Democratic president will go back and rescind this particular order. Democrats, at least in my lifetime, have been almost as deeply committed to brutal police practices as the Republicans. It would take a Democrat uniquely committed to criminal justice reform to go back in and take away the indemnification Trump has provided, and one can only imagine the stink the police unions will make if such a Democrat takes it away.”
And if you are saying, “not so fast our courts will have something to say about all this, I am saying I am very dubious on that front also, but more on that in a minute, because innocent people have been shipped away and/or locked up, and judges have already been arrested. There’s no reason we will not see an increase in tempo on both of these fronts, and very shortly.
On Wednesday, the great Thom Hartmann typed up a must-read titled “America’s Moral Collapse is Not Hypothetical — It’s on a Plane to Libya.”
Hartmann writes this:
“The news broke this week that the administration is preparing to send migrants to Libya on military flights as early as tomorrow. And this isn’t just another policy announcement from the daily outrage factory; it’s the latest escalation in a deliberate strategy of cruelty that began during Trump’s first term.”
I encourage you to read this piece in its entirety.
So …
… If you are rubbing your tired eyes and saying, “Hey, thanks for scaring the hell out of us, Earl, now what the hell can we do about it?” … I am saying, I’m not really sure, because I have been warning about this for years, but too many people were concerned about the price of eggs, and grousing about Joe Biden’s economy (which, by the way, was the strongest in the entire world) to pay much attention.
I will, however, offer this anecdote of hope. It’s a story I’ve told before and seems to resonate more than ever, even if I’m not sure it will make you (or me) feel any better.
In the moments after the polls closed here in Wisconsin in the 2022 midterms, I was at a gathering in Madison and our Democratic Party Chairman at the time, Ben Wikler, was hanging out, because the guy had the ability to be in 17 places at once.
I asked him what he thought were the most important races of the night.
He said without blinking, the governor races in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. The Blue Wall. At the time I took it to mean that if there was any Republican fuckery after the presidential election two years out, we'd have Democratic governors in place to stand as a bulwark against their crap.
Well, we all know how that went last November.
Democrat-backed Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate Judge Susan Crawford gestures to supporters after voters elected her in April. REUTERS/Vincent Alban
That epic disappointment doesn’t change the fact that all three states still have Democratic governors and liberal Supreme Courts in place to push back against what is most assuredly coming with this latest EO.
Count on Trump to continue to test these battleground states with his fascist venom, because he knows if he can topple us, the rest of America will fall.
So now we see if the courts will hold here, and if the politicians and citizens in these battleground states and elsewhere will do whatever is necessary to hold the line, and protect our country from the anti-Democratic fascists who have announced they are coming for us.
No matter what, we are smack in the middle of a war for our survival, and even if too many of us can’t bring ourselves to actually say it, we damn well better start acting like it.
(D. Earl Stephens is the author of “Toxic Tales: A Caustic Collection of Donald J. Trump’s Very Important Letters” and finished up a 30-year career in journalism as the Managing Editor of Stars and Stripes. You can find all his work here, and follow him on Bluesky here.)
EXCLUSIVE: Breastfeeding mom of US citizen sues Kristi Noem after being grabbed by ICE
The Washington press corps saw Joe Biden’s aging, but it doesn’t seem to notice Donald Trump’s. Why? It’s pretty simple, really. Trump acts like a big, tough man. He spends a lot of his time demonstrating his big, tough manhood. Biden never did that. It’s not in his nature. Guess which personality type gets more positive attention from reporters?
So even if Trump lies and lies and lies, even if he inexplicably sways and bops to music for minutes on end, even if he descends into outright gibberish, and even if he demands that you and everyone you know accept as gospel truth his maniacal delusions — even if he does all these things that old men with dementia often do, he’ll never be called old.
Because he looks big and tough.
Fact is, he’s weak. He’s always been weak. And his weakness is always on display, if you’re paying attention, even as he daily demonstrates his so-called dominance. Indeed, there is no other way of putting it honestly.
When you do a thing that triggers a reaction, then pull back that thing as a consequence of that reaction, that’s textbook weakness. That’s what he’s been doing with tariffs since he took office. On again, off again, no consistency, no logic, utter chaos – because he’s weak.
I don’t have much faith in recent polls that show majorities disapproving of his job performance, but I do think they could be useful in one important way: getting members of the press corps to take a harder look at Trump, perhaps even draw a lesson from their time covering Biden, and come to a conclusion about the president.
That said, I don’t have much faith in the press corps, as I say below to Jennifer Schulze. She does, though, and you should take her seriously. She’s a longtime Chicago journalist and publisher of Indistinct Chatter, a newsletter about the news. While the mainstream media has a “weird reluctance” to criticize Trump, she says, independent media and local news reporters don’t. She puts her faith in them. I’m inclined to agree.
John: So the president wore a blue suit to the pope’s funeral. He fiddled with his phone. He chewed gum. He fell asleep. If a Democrat were violating decorum like this, the press corps would be all over it.
Jennifer: Rightwing media will ignore all of it. Mainstream media might mention it in a throwaway sentence or as part of a pundit panel. But I doubt any will do it as a stand-alone story. (The New York Times did do a story on the blue suit, but it was by the fashion editor.) I do expect to see coverage of Trump’s behavior in independent media and in newsletters. That’s been the pattern for years with Trump coverage and especially since the start of the 2024 campaign.
There is a weird reluctance to criticize Trump. The thinking that it’s just “Trump being Trump” or “nothing new here” gets in the way of telling some hard truths about him, his patterns of behavior, etc.
John: That seems to be grounded in the belief that he’s dominant.
Jennifer: The press has always had an odd, hands-off approach to Trump. Now I think it’s driven by fear – of losing access, like the AP and others did; of being called out and then being targeted by Trump, Elon Musk, or the Maga hordes; of angering corporate media owners who seem more interested in protecting their other business interests.
A good test is to ask yourself if a Democrat (like Joe Biden) did this, how would the press cover it? Biden’s polling 100 days in was significantly higher than where Trump is now (52 percent versus 39 percent), yet much of the press seems to buy the Trump spin that he’s all powerful, overwhelmingly popular, etc. Is that because they are locked in the Trump bubble and can’t see what so many of the rest of us see? I think that’s certainly part of it, combined with fear.
John: You have written a lot about local news reporting, and how the administration’s policies are being reported on the ground level. There, representations of reality are very different. Why is that?
Jennifer: The job of local news is to tell stories about real-life community impacts. If a Head Start program is cut by DOGE, there are compelling stories to tell about the families hurt by those cuts.
The same is true if Trump’s tariffs result in layoffs at the local factory. Or if fewer people come to visit the nearby National Park that is a key economic driver for a region. In every case, there are real people who are impacted and telling those stories is what local news does best.
I’d also add that local news does a really good job of covering voter outrage. With some few exceptions, the national media is not capturing the deep anger and frustration we are seeing at these town hall meetings, “Tesla Takedown” protests and marches.
The reporters covering these stories haven’t parachuted in. The people impacted are their friends and neighbors, as well as their audience. All of this is also big news in cities and towns around the country. It’s what people are talking about, it’s hitting their pocketbooks, their livelihoods. Of course, local news is going to be on top of it.
John: Trump’s polling is falling. I don’t expect his behavior to change. He didn’t respond to polling the first time. I doubt he will this time. Even so, polls might affect the press corps’ rose-colored glasses. Thoughts?
Jennifer: Throughout the 2024 campaign, polling seemed to drive almost all the coverage, so I’m very curious to see how much ongoing coverage there is of these various polls that show Americans are pretty upset with everything Trump is doing. Some of the initial headlines are brutal and accurate. ABC News: “Trump has lowest 100-day approval rating in 80 years.” USA Today: “More than 75% of Americans disapprove of Trump’s handling of the economy, new poll finds.”
The DC press corps may eventually start to be a little more critical of Trump as his popularity tanks. But I don’t expect any significant changes, at least in the immediate future. It’ll be like turning the Queen Mary with slow, barely perceptible shifts in tone. No matter what, I’m not sure we will ever reach the level of riotous behavior we saw towards Biden. I mean the press was literally screaming at a sitting president. I do expect independent media to continue to be as fearless, as it’s been all along, no matter what the polling shows.
John: I have very little faith in the press corps. At the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, an award-winning reporter said journalists have to regain public trust, and pointed to the “cover up” of Biden’s age as an example of what they need to do better. This, in the context of Trump’s very obvious cognitive impairments.
Jennifer: I think there are pockets of excellent coverage by the mainstream media outlets. NBC News is excellent on everything Pete Hegseth and Signalgate. Reuters, the AP and CBS News are breaking lots of news about the DOGE cuts at the health agencies, National Weather Service, NOAA, etc. The beleaguered Washington Post has had some excellent DOGE cuts reporting. But it’s the independent outlets that are really doing remarkable work.
I agree with media critic Mark Jacob who suggests that the daily media circus at the White House is best covered by a camera and an intern. We need experienced reporters digging up real news, not regurgitating lies from Trump and Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt.
John: The DNC’s new chairmen has said it’s important for the party to build its own media infrastructure. I see movement here and there. First, do you think that’s important and why? If so, what are you seeing?
Jennifer: I’m one of many folks who have long suggested that Democrats – whether it’s the DNC or Congress – must offer the country a daily fact-based counternarrative. That should be the core of any new media infrastructure. Remember the very popular daily COVID briefings from Democratic Governor JB Pritzker here in Illinois? The Democrats should be doing that right now. Don’t try to dream up some new podcast or something like that. Make a commitment to putting someone in front of a microphone every single day to tell Americans the truth. That should include specific stories about the impacts of Trump’s policies, how regular people are organizing, play clips from voters at town hall meetings, share what Democrats are actually doing to push back, etc. There is an information void just waiting to be filled.
My mom died from COVID in 2020, just after Mother’s Day. I couldn’t write about it until I could be honest about who she was, a feat complicated by my then-pending congressional race, which served my own ass to me on an unceremonious platter. Apparently climate change wasn’t at the top of voters’ concerns then. Today, it feels like the GOP is deliberately accelerating it.
The worst part of my mom’s death was that she — like most COVID patients — died alone in a sterile hospital room with no family allowed to visit. Every time I tried to write this Mother's Day column, my simmering anger at how Donald Trump mismanaged and lied to the country about the coronavirus percolated into a full boil that scalded my best intentions. Instead of honoring my mother’s truth without deflection or self-pity, I kept churning out bitter screeds about how elections have consequences, and our democracy wouldn’t be on the brink if only — if only — everyone who cares actually bothered to vote.
My mother was extraordinary in many ways, including her disdain for a woman’s “fate” to be stuck in the house, raising children, while men got to “see the world.” The man whose ticket out of Southern Indiana she co-opted would buy her passage to the west coast, where he, my father, served in the Navy in Oahu, Hawaii. It was also where he brutalized her, us, and anything that moved, repeatedly, with impunity, and without regard to audience.
Because of my father’s predilection for extreme violence, I became my mother’s caretaker from a very early age. After the final episode, complete with burst capillaries from her near-complete asphyxiation, we went into foster care. When my mom eventually got out of the hospital & rehab (WTF can be done, anyway, to “rehab” someone who was oxygen-deprived long enough for tiny red capillaries to burst all over their face?), we moved back to Indiana.
My mother was so afraid my father would return from the Vietnam War and finish the job, she never sought child support — which meant years of dire poverty on top of whatever brain damage she sustained from the burst capillaries incident. Even in her compromised state, my mother knew that when a man promises to finish you off, he will keep his promise if given half the chance.
So we moved to Huntingburg, Indiana, to live with my mom’s equally poor sister, Aunt Maggie. My mom and her sister Margaret were small-town lookers whose beauty and ambition attracted the same kind of husband, one who needs to capture, then own and cage, a beautiful thing. Aunt Maggie was making her way as a newly single mother as well, and for the same reason.
Shortly after we all moved in together, Aunt Maggie’s escape — and her life — ended abruptly. Her story and violent ending would upstage even my mother’s.
Maggie’s death was a continuation of an unending rotation, a locked cycle of poverty and trauma. It was the same story played out across the country in the nightly news, only the names have been changed. In case anyone is unschooled in the ways of poverty, poverty causes trauma causes poverty causes trauma. After some years stuck on this decidedly American treadmill with one tragedy following the next, my mom eventually remarried a wonderful man, my stepfather Bob Hyde, who would stop to help a struggling beetle.
While we were fortunate to have a kind benefactor in our lives, neither of my siblings overcame their early origins. You hear that formative childhood years, one through five, pretty much set the tone, and I guess that’s true enough in our case. I'm pretty sure the only reason I became "successful" (whatever that means, here I mean financially) while my siblings floundered, was because my mom tapped me to take care of her, which meant early financial responsibility and a non-optional work ethic. I started earning at 11, never stopped, and financially supported my mom and sister all my adult life. My brother Curtis, meanwhile, started his own poverty-trauma treadmill, probably because it was what he knew, and today he runs on it still.
My mother's situation left her entirely dependent on me, and over the years, her dependence developed into raging neediness over all things, large and small. I’ll never know whether my mother’s mental health challenges were organic, or caused by extreme domestic violence. On the campaign trail when I spoke about growing up with the effects of untreated substance abuse and domestic violence, I was talking about my father. When I spoke about growing up with untreated mental illness, I was talking about my mother. For sure, all three things in our household were interrelated, as they are in most every tragic, sad headline running in the evening news.
The only Mother's Day gift I can offer up now is full honesty and ownership of a story all too common in America. It’s a reality of extreme domestic violence, substance abuse, and untreated mental illness. It’s the American struggle of single moms so afraid of their abusers they live in poverty instead of seeking child support. It’s an American story that plays across racial lines, geography, and culture, one that state-forced births will only exacerbate, trapping more vulnerable women with their abusers.
My tribute to my mother is a siren of agency and honesty, so kids and mothers in the same situation know they are not alone. Stigma, and societal judgment, only make tragedies worse, which is why we should spare no time for them. Instead, we should salute the women and children who survive.
I miss my mother. She was a stone around my neck, but she was my heavy necklace.
It took me a minute to write this because the real tragedy wasn’t in how the country failed her at her death. The real tragedy is how our laws and our system failed to protect her — and hundreds of thousands of women like her — in life.
So I guess my screed survives, after all. Stripped of angst, anger, regret and sorrow, it boils down to one simple word: Vote.
Sabrina Haake is a columnist and 25 year litigator specializing in 1st and 14th Amendment defense. Her Substack, The Haake Take, is free.
EXCLUSIVE: Breastfeeding mom of US citizen sues Kristi Noem after being grabbed by ICE
The American Revolution wasn’t just a break from Britain — it was an uprising against three ancient tyrannies: warlord kings, the morbidly rich, and theocrats. Today, those same forces are clawing their way back into power, and if we don’t fight them now, everything the Founders built could collapse.
In the Declaration of Independence and throughout his years of personal correspondence, Thomas Jefferson (and multiple others among the Founders) identified three historic tyrannies that he and his colleagues fought the Revolutionary War to overthrow and replace with a democratic republic.
The first were the warlord kings, who’d been conquering nations and peoples for millennia and, by 1776, were considered “normal” by most citizens of the world. These were families who, in the earlier years of their countries, had acquired power by conquest: war, pillage, rape, and the subjugation of the people they’d vanquished.
These warlord kings justified their oppression by claiming their god had decreed their rule, that might makes right, and maintained their rule over generations by the threat of violence. In America’s case, we experienced increasing oppression and taxation throughout the rule of King George II, which got far worse when George III took over Great Britain in 1760.
The second were the morbidly rich, known in that era as lords and ladies, barons and dukes, earls, counts, marquess’, and princes and princesses. They were the owners of the East India Company, for example, against whom our revolution commenced with the Boston Tea Party in late 1773.
Jefferson and John Adams, in particular, had lengthy correspondences — often quoting the philosophers who inspired the Enlightenment — about how “the rich” always worked to corrupt popular governments and should never be trusted with control over America.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau, in his 1762 Economie Politique, which inspired and informed our nation’s Founders, noted that the main job of a republic “is found in rendering justice to all, and especially in protecting the poor against the tyranny of the rich.”
Jefferson (who died in bankruptcy) agreed. In a 1787 letter to Edward Carrington, he wrote:
“It seems to be the law of our general nature, in spite of individual exceptions; and experience declares that man is the only animal which devours his own kind, for I can apply no milder term to the governments of Europe, and to the general prey of the rich on the poor.”
In an 1816 letter to Samuel Kercheval, Jefferson amplified the point:
“I am not among those who fear the people. They, and not the rich, are our dependence for continued freedom.”
And Rousseau was also echoed by Adams in a November 15, 1813 letter to Jefferson:
“When Aristocracies are established by human Laws and honour and Wealth and Power are made hereditary by municipal Laws and political Institutions, then I acknowledge artificial Aristocracy to commence: but this never commences, till Corruption in Elections become dominant and uncontroulable.”
The third tyranny that our Founding generation overthrew were the theocrats: the popes, mullahs, preachers, priests, and even the King proclaiming himself the head of the Church of England.
By the 1770s, rightwing Christians had largely taken over much of New England; they provoked a teenage Ben Franklin to flee Massachusetts for Philadelphia to get away from the mandatory Sunday church attendance and taxes to fund the clergy. In his book Toward the Mystery he wrote:
“I have found Christian dogma unintelligible. Early in life I absented myself from Christian assemblies.”
Similarly, Jefferson and Adams (among others) wrote at length about how the Christians of their day were constantly trying to corrupt government and what a battle they faced in that regard.
In the place of these three forms of government, the men who put together America proposed a constitutionally-limited democratic republic, a nation where the power rested with and was derived from the people themselves, rather than coming down from on-high kings, theocrats, or the morbidly rich.
Throughout the quarter-millennia of America’s existence, we’ve repeatedly had to fight back against warlords, plutocrats, and theocrats.
When a handful of wealthy families took over the South, the warlords of the Confederacy declared war on us. The morbidly rich have challenged our government multiple times, most famously during the Gilded Age, the Roaring 20s, and in the years since the Reagan Revolution. And preachers seeking political power have been a constant thorn in our side, from the Scopes Monkey Trial to today’s efforts to insert Christianity into our public schools, the Constitution be damned.
And here we are again.
We have a president who thinks of himself as the king of America, issuing proclamations as if he has a divine right. He’s an oligarch himself, and has built a corrupt alliance with other oligarchs in America, Russia, and around the world to enhance his own wealth and power. And since the days of Reagan the GOP has embraced the religious right, who now are so in thrall to the Republican Party that they can reliably hand electoral victories to rightwing candidates.
So, like our nation’s Founders, we must remember, resist, and reform.
We must remember the three historic tyrannies and teach our young people about them and the ever-present danger of their return. Promote history and civics. Remind people of the oppression our forebears faced. Update our educational system so the true history of our nation can be taught.
We must resist Trump’s and the GOP’s efforts to turn America into an oligarchic, theocratic, neofascist kingdom. Show up in the streets. Contact your elected representatives (Congress’ number is 202-224-3121) all the way down to local officials and let them know you want a democratic republic. Show up for public meetings like school boards, county commissions, city councils, etc., and demand an end to big money’s, big defense contractors’, and big religion’s control over our political system.
And we must reform America’s political system that’s been captured over the past 50 years by massive transnational corporations and the billionaire class. Get money out of politics. Overturn Citizens United. Make voting a right rather than a mere privilege.
If we fail, two-and-a-half centuries of blood, sweat, and tears will have been wasted as America slips into the type of warlord/oligarch/theocrat capture that’s been the fate of Russia, Hungary, Egypt, Turkey, and so many other formerly democratic nations.
But if we succeed, we’ll have a serious opportunity to finally make America a fully inclusive nation, a beacon of liberty, and a “land of the free and home of the brave” we can all be proud of.
That’s worth fighting for with everything we have. See you in the streets on No Kings Day…
ALSO READ: 'Sad white boys': Fear as Trump terror adviser shrugs off threat from 'inside the house'
On Wednesday, Chief Justice John Roberts, in a not-so-veiled swipe at Donald Trump, stressed that the U.S. Constitution’s “main innovation” was the creation of an independent judiciary. Our constitutional system of government only works, he emphasized, if power shared between the three branches of federal government remains equal and balanced, and it is up to the courts, not Trump, to decide what makes it so.
Roberts’ remarks followed the Trump regime’s astonishing flurry of attacks against the judiciary. On April 25, Attorney General Pam Bondi called judges who refused to legitimize Trump’s power grabs “deranged,” then, with characteristic bombast, warned the judiciary, “we will come after you and we will prosecute you.” That same day, Kash Patel had a Wisconsin judge perp-walked out of the courthouse in handcuffs because she allowed a defendant to exit from a side door to the main hall where everyone else, including the FBI, was waiting. Three days later, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt intimated that Trump could have Supreme Court justices arrested.
Roberts can well see that Trump’s henchmen are attacking the judiciary as the last line of defense against an authoritarian coup. Perhaps more difficult to see is that Trump’s attacks, in concert with his deliberate weakening of national security, are acts of sabotage. He is wrecking our constitutional form of government in an effort to replace it with something else. From this perspective, it is difficult to see Trump’s strategy as anything short of treasonous.
Throughout his first 100 days, Trump engaged in wild and unprecedented acts of retribution against the rule of law and anyone who tried to make him answer to it. Last week, describing Trump’s executive order to punish and extort lawyers who represented his political adversaries, a federal judge noted, “No American President has ever before issued executive orders like the one at issue” in an attempt to march the country toward totalitarianism.
Aside from metastasizing power grabs, the most common thread running through Trump’s EOs — announced through a series of White House propaganda papers issued every other day — is Trump’s projection of his own crimes and misdeeds onto others. Anyone trying to map Trump’s elusive plan of governance need only look at what he purports to attack in his orders, because those are his true intentions. On his first day in office, for example, Trump issued an EO “Ending the weaponization of the federal government,” dialing weaponization of government power to levels not seen since King George.
Freighted with propaganda, the White House memo regurgitated Trump’s grievances about efforts to hold him legally accountable for his actions, falsely proclaiming as “fact,” under seal of the White House, that, “The prior administration and allies throughout the country engaged in an unprecedented, third-world weaponization of prosecutorial power.”
Trump then turned these accusations into a plan of action never before seen in American history, ordering the AG, DOJ and FBI to conduct political investigations, arrests and prosecutions.
Determined to rule by fiat in order to bypass both legislative and judicial branches, Trump has issued a slew of incongruent declarations and EOs too wide-ranging to list. To squelch dissent and criticism of those orders, he describes critics as ‘enemies of the state,’ and accuses them of treason.
Trump’s presidential memorandum about “leakers” of government information describes as “treasonous” any disclosure of sensitive information for the purposes of undermining foreign policy, national security, or government effectiveness. ‘Undermining,’ of course, is whatever Trump says it is, which means any criticism can be deemed ‘treason.’
It’s a bold intimidation campaign meant to facilitate prosecution and imprisonment of critics in the near future, modeled on authoritarians like Russia’s Vladimir Putin, El Salvador’s Nayib Bukele, and Hungary’s Viktor Orban. While his left hand attempts to silence critics Putin-style, Trump’s right hand is actively sabotaging national security, by:
Step by step, agency by federal agency, Trump is systematically disabling institutions that could interfere with his acquisition of domestic power, while at the same time inviting a foreign attack. Standing alone, each act weakens national security in ways that can’t be measured because the consequences have not yet materialized. Taken in concert, they reflect Trump’s intentional subversion of our national security interests.
Treason, a federal crime, is defined by the Constitution as ‘levying war’ against the nation; it also includes “giving aid and comfort” to our enemies. Trump credibly has been accused of treason for aiding Russia’s interests over our own. In 2023, his actions in fomenting the Jan. 6 attack were also deemed treasonous when the Colorado Supreme Court found that he engaged in insurrection, a decision with roots in the Constitution’s definition of treason. The U.S. Supreme Court found a workaround to avoid Colorado’s application of the 14th Amendment on grounds that had nothing to do with — and did not disturb — Colorado’s finding of insurrection.
Treason is defined as the betrayal of one’s country. It is hard to imagine a deeper betrayal than an American president questioning the basic rule of the US Constitution while he actively subverts it.
I have no illusion that the spineless Republican party is prepared to rein Trump in; as one senator admitted, they are all too “frightened” of retribution to do their constitutional duty. So for now, thanks to a partisan Supreme Court and cowardly federal legislators, we are a nation held hostage by a lawless president of questionable sanity and his power-drunk sycophants.
As America wonders how bad it will get before he is stopped, at least we are learning a shared civics lesson: we are learning why the Constitution prohibits traitors from being elected into federal office.
Sabrina Haake is a 25+ year federal trial attorney specializing in 1st and 14th A defense. Her Substack, The Haake Take, is free.
Every kid has heard “No means no!” when they want something their parents don’t think they should have. This week that phrase got a couple high profile uses when Canada’s new Prime Minister, Mark Carney, told Donald Trump right to his face that Canada was not and never would be for sale and Montana’s Congressman Ryan Zinke forcefully said “no” to the sale of public lands in the West.
In this day and age seeing U.S. politicians keep their campaign promises — or honor their oaths of office — is becoming increasingly rare. But on “keeping public lands in public hands,” Rep. Zinke did just that.
The measure in question was part of the “big, beautiful bill” touted by Trump to give yet more tax breaks to the already wealthy. The new twist was to sell hundreds of thousands of acres of federal lands in Nevada and Utah for mining, logging, drilling and development to finance those tax breaks.
Doug Burgum, the Secretary of the Interior, has publicly declared public lands and resources as “natural assets” that can be used to pay down the national debt. Consequently, GOP Reps. Mark Amodei of Nevada and Celeste Maloy of Utah inserted the public land sale as an amendment since it was not contained in the original draft of the bill due to bipartisan opposition.
Montana’s Congressman and former Secretary of the Interior called the move to sell public lands “a red line” and was adamant: “It’s a no now. It will be a no later. It will be a no forever.’’ As Zinke explained his firm opposition: “I prefer the management scheme and I give as an example a hotel. If you don’t like the management of a hotel, don’t sell the hotel; change the management.”
At almost the same time, Canada’s Prime Minister, Mark Carney was using almost the same words in his White House meeting. After listening to Trump’s blather about how Canada should be our 51st state, how much he “loved Canada” and how erasing the “artificial” border line would make one beautiful piece of real estate, Carney used Trump’s own real estate line to fire back: “As you know from real estate, there are some places that are never for sale. We’re sitting in one right now. Having met with the owners of Canada over the course of the campaign the last several months, it’s not for sale, won’t be for sale,” adding: “Canada’s not for sale. It never will be for sale.”
Carney won office largely on his opposition to Trump’s intentions to take over Canada, saying during the election that: “America wants our land, our resources, our water, our country. But these are not idle threats. President Trump is trying to break us so that America can own us. That will never ever happen.”
Both Zinke and Carney are dead right. Polls show 74% of Americans oppose the sale of our public lands — and Carney’s election speaks for itself. He won by fighting Trump’s nasty threat to take over our northern neighbor that 77% of Canadians oppose.
For a guy who’s always been told he can have everything he wants, the double-barrel blast should be a wake up call. The world is not one big real estate sale to be marketed solely to make greedy billionaires even more money. Kudos to Zinke and Carney — and hopefully a sign to the rest of Congress and the world that it’s time to tell our spoiled child of a president “No means no!”
Copyright © 2025 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 |
Masthead
|
Privacy Policy
|
Manage Preferences
|
Debug Logs
For corrections contact
corrections@rawstory.com
, for support contact
support@rawstory.com
.