All posts tagged "aclu"

'False!' Kristi Noem's DHS furious at accusations of 'racial targeting'

The Department of Homeland Security refuted an article in Monday's Los Angeles Times that accused the agency of making sweeping arrests based on "racial profiling."

The article's headline read, "Fears of racing profiling rise as Border Patrol conducts 'roving patrols,' detains U.S. citizens."

It quoted an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California as saying, "We are seeing ICE come into our communities to do indiscriminate mass arrests of immigrants or people who appear to them to be immigrant, largely based on racial profiling."

The DHS official X account posted a screenshot of the article and stated, "Any claims that individuals have been ‘targeted’ by law enforcement because of their skin color are disgusting and categorically FALSE."

The post continued, "These types of smears are designed to demonize and villainize our brave ICE law enforcement. DHS enforcement operations are highly targeted, and officers do their due diligence. We know who we are targeting ahead of time. If and when we do encounter individuals subject to arrest, our law enforcement is trained to ask a series of well-determined questions to determine status and removability."

The post then claimed, "We will follow the President's direction and continue to work to get the worst of the worst criminal illegal aliens off of America's streets."

ICE has expanded its reach far beyond "criminals," however, which has sparked nationwide protests that began in L.A.

According to Reuters, "U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention statistics show the number of detainees arrested by ICE with no other criminal charges or convictions rose from about 860 in January to 7,800 this month - a more than 800% increase."

Earlier this month, top Trump aide Stephen Miller reportedly set a quota for ICE agents to arrest 3,000 undocumented migrants each day.

Read the L.A. Times article here.




'Dangerous sea change': Critics warn Supreme Court about inserting religion into schools

Two new court cases will test the limits of the First Amendment as the Supreme Court decides just how far religion can permeate public schools.

At issue are two cases the court recently agreed to hear: in the first, the six Republican appointees and three Democratic appointees will consider whether to permit the country’s first publicly funded religious charter school in Oklahoma; and in the second, the court will hear an appeal from parents in Maryland who want the right to keep their children from reading books having to do with LGBTQ subjects.

The American Civil Liberties Union condemned the court's decision to take the Oklahoma case, saying in a statement: “The law is clear: Charter schools are public schools and must be secular and open to all students." The statement continued, "Oklahoma taxpayers...should not be forced to fund a religious public school that plans to discriminate against students and staff and indoctrinate students into one religion. Converting public schools into Sunday schools would be a dangerous sea change for our democracy.”

ALSO READ: Top GOPer's ‘most immediate’ priority for new committee includes probing a MAGA conspiracy

As it stands, the Constitution provides for the separation of church and state, thanks to the establishment clause of the First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion." According to the Freedom Forum, "the establishment clause is understood by the courts as separating church from state on every level of government," including taxpayer-funded public schools.

Legal writer Jordan Rubin stated in a piece for MSNBC.com, "Of course, the Dobbs case and other recent appeals have shown that a majority of the court can change how the law is interpreted if it chooses to." By giving states increased rights to limit or outlaw abortions, the Supreme Court did away with nearly 50 years of a constitutional right to abortion in the United States.

There's nothing to preclude the court from reinterpreting the Establishment Clause in these upcoming cases that could further blur the lines between church and state. As Rubin wrote, "Once again, we wait to see what the court will do."

Read the MSNBC article here.

Biden in hot water with AOC: ‘It’s wrong. It’s not okay.’

WASHINGTON — President Joe Biden is in hot water with the progressive wing of his party over his new, tough-on-migrant border policy.

"I think it's a profound disappointment," Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) told Raw Story after voting on the House floor Wednesday.

Biden’s new executive order will force asylum seekers to be turned back at the border whenever the seven-day average for migrant encounters — an unscientific measurement that sometimes double or triple counts asylum seekers — tops 2,500 between entry points.

With immigration firmly on voters' minds, AOC and other progressives are questioning why Biden seems to be borrowing a play from former President Donald Trump’s anti-immigrant playbook.

ALSO READ: ‘Journalistic dystopian nightmare’: Inside a Tennessee college media meltdown

“It’s wrong. It’s not okay,” said Ocasio-Cortez, who has endorsed Biden in his reelection bid. “I think what we need to do is support a natural path to citizenship and the resources necessary.”

It’s not just AOC and her fellow so-called “Squad” members up in arms this time. This week, the American Civil Liberties Union announced it’s challenging Biden’s executive order in court, just as it did under then-President Trump.

“The Biden administration just announced an executive order that will severely restrict people’s legal right to seek asylum, putting tens of thousands of lives at risk,” the ACLU tweeted on X. “This action takes the same approach as the Trump administration’s asylum ban. We will be challenging this order in court.”



Biden took the bait laid out by the conservative messaging machine, said Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.

“I think it’s a mistake, what he's doing,” Jayapal told reporters on the Capitol steps Wednesday. “I think it's using tools — and I want to be clear that Joe Biden is significantly different from Donald Trump — but he’s using tools that Donald Trump used and that we all spoke out against.”

Progressives are banking on the courts overturning the measure, but they complain Biden’s White House has now caved to the far-right.

“I think this will be declared unconstitutional, just as Trump's was when he tried to do the same thing, but it's troubling that our Democratic president and some Democrats are endorsing this strategy. It's not going to fix things at the border,” Jayapal said. “You can't fix things because to fix things, you need legal pathways and you need resources. You need to modernize the system, which Republicans have refused to do over and over again.”

ALSO READ: Texas AG Ken Paxton campaign ad mistakenly implicates Donald Trump

Jayapal is questioning why their party’s standard-bearer ceded this issue to the GOP, especially after Republicans — at Trump’s behest — walked away from a bipartisan Senate immigration reform package earlier this Congress.

“We need to talk to the American people, because I don’t think that they, despite all the badgering from many Republicans, I think the American people actually want immigrants here. They just want an orderly process, which we all want. So we need to talk about our vision,” Jayapal said. “And it needs to be very different from Republicans.”

More moderate Democrats are defending Biden in the face of the withering criticisms he’s facing from the far-left of the party.

“The president's promise was that he was going to present an immigration reform bill to the Congress that would be comprehensive, and that's what he did. He did that in the very first piece of legislation on his first day,” Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA) said just off the House floor Wednesday. “His intention is a broad immigration reform package. That's getting nowhere. We've been pushing that for years, with no support in the Republican conference.”

After Republicans walked, the president still moved forward with some of the policies being pushed by the far-right, which is infuriating progressives.

“Isn't he caving to Fox News talking points?” Raw Story asked.

“No. I think he's trying to address half the issue — the half of the issue that he is able to address. He needs to address the other piece of it,” Garcia told Raw Story of the push for broader immigration reforms. “I am hopeful through my conversations with the White House that there's more action coming.”

Democrats still want immigration-related measures such as a pathway to citizenship for otherwise law-abiding people living in United States illegally and dealing with so-called “Dreamers” — children brought to America illegally and who, in many cases, have lived here most of their lives.

ALSO READ: 8 ways convicted felon Donald Trump doesn't become president

Also on the agenda: a variety of guest worker programs, variety of other opportunities,” Garcia said. “We do have a major challenge to address. He's trying to address this. We’ve got to address the other half. Just addressing border security is not going to solve the challenge.”

Without Republican buy-in, Garcia says to expect more action from Biden on immigration in the coming months, as he and Trump get closer and closer to Election Day.

“What I can say is there are other executive orders that I think the White House is assessing,” Garcia said.

It’s unclear if those actions will be enough for the younger, energetic progressive wing of the party.

When it comes to Gen Z voters, Ocasio-Cortez has a simple message — one she and other progressives hope reverberates all the way down Pennsylvania Avenue to the White House.

“I’m profoundly disappointed by it,” AOC told Raw Story.

AnaBelle Elliott and Caroline Pierce contributed to this report.

Massachusetts cop with body-cam searches middle school for LGBTQ-themed book: report

A cop's decision to sport a body camera and search a Massachusetts middle school for a book has raised serious concerns among civil liberties experts, a new report shows.

The Berkshire Eagle reported Wednesday on mounting fears after the Great Barrington plainclothes police officer who entered an eighth grade classroom at W.E.B. Du Bois Regional Middle School.

“Police going into schools and searching for books is the sort of thing you hear about in communist China and Russia," Ruth A. Bourquin, senior and managing attorney for the ACLU of Massachusetts, told the local news outlet. "What are we doing?”

For their part, police say they were obligated to investigate a complaint about the book "Gender Queer" by Maia Kobabe, a memoir about gender identity that contains sexually explicit illustrations and language, the report notes.

"It is this that many in LGBTQIA+ community say they believe is the reason for the censorship — not so-called “obscenity” concerns," writes reporter Heather Bellow.

But Great Barrington Police Chief Paul Storti said in a statement, “Because this complaint was made directly to the police department, we are obligated and have a duty to examine the complaint further."

Also read: Unsealed warrant for Guiliani associate Lev Parnas makes revelations about Ukraine scandal

Berkshire Hills Regional School District Superintendent Peter Dillon said in a statement that he wished the situation was handled in a different way.

“I would have preferred that the complaint came to the school or district and not the police,” Dillon said. “We have systems to respond to concerns about curriculum.”

In a letter to parents this Tuesday, Dillon and School Committee Chair Stephen Bannon apologized for how the incident was handled, according to the report.

“Faced with an unprecedented police investigation of what should be a purely educational issue, we tried our best to serve the interests of students, families, teachers, and staff,” the letter stated. “In hindsight, we would have approached that moment differently. We are sorry. We can do better to refine and support our existing policies. We are committed to supporting all our students, particularly vulnerable populations.”

Read the full report at The Berkshire Eagle.

Jewish family fled hometown after Mike Johnson warned of ‘enemy’ to the gospel: report

A Jewish family that challenged Christian prayer in their local school fled their home town after then-evangelical attorney Mike Johnson warned of an “enemy” that was “silencing the gospel,” according to a new report.

Johnson’s words, spoken when he was a senior attorney with the evangelical legal group Alliance Defending Freedom, appeared in a local Louisiana newspaper published in 2004 and uncovered Friday by the Huffington Post.

“The ultimate goal of the enemy is silencing the gospel,” the Shreveport Times report quotes Johnson as saying. “This is spiritual warfare.”

Johnson was speaking at the Airline Drive Church of Christ about a lawsuit brought by two Shreveport Elementary School parents challenging prayer sessions, Christian sing-alongs and a recess teacher-led prayer group called Stallions for Christ, according to the report.

ALSO READ: Marjorie Taylor Greene declares war on Republicans

One week earlier, Johnson had published an opinion piece in the same newspaper challenging the legitimacy of the separation of church and state, according to documents published by the Huffington Post.

“In the suit, the American Civil Liberties Union includes several meritless claims that First Amendment rights of two Stockwell Place Elementary School students have been violated because the school failed to maintain the so-called ‘separation of church and state,’” Johnson wrote.

“The lawsuit…offers the latest example of the radical left’s desperate efforts to silence all public expression of religious faith.”

The Huffington Post notes the House speaker’s spokesperson denied the former attorney was referring to Jewish people as the enemy.

“You are mischaracterizing his remark,” Taylor Haulsee told the Huffington Post. “Johnson was referring to any coordinated attempt to impede religious expression that is protected under the Constitution, not any single family.”

Yet the lawsuit ended with a partial-dismissal and settlement after the family fled the state to “escape the harassment and threats” their children faced at school, according to court records uncovered by the Huffington Post.

The American Civil Liberties Union, not an official party in the case, said at the time that the family likely could have won the lawsuit, the Huffington Post notes.

“Had the plaintiffs remained in the state,” then-executive director Joe Cook told the Shreveport Times, “they would have been found meritorious.”

Read the full report here.

By outing 19 students to their parents, Texas school district violated ethics code

This article first appeared on Houston Landing and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

The Katy Independent School District’s decision to out transgender students to their parents is not only what one attorney described as “bullying masquerading as policy” – it’s also a violation of the Texas Education Agency’s code of ethics.

Last week, my Houston Landing colleague Miranda Dunlap reported that Katy ISD has called the parents of 19 students, informing those parents that their kid identifies as transgender or has requested to go by a different name or pronouns at school. That number, which Dunlap obtained through a public records request, shakes out to about two kids per week since August, when the school board first passed its policy requiring staff to notify parents of such situations.

And it’s likely that as the school year progresses, the number will only continue to climb, creating a wider wake of harm to these kids, some of whom are likely to have been outed to families that will not support their identities.

“This policy, in particular, has a distinct and really dangerous set of harms,” says Chloe Kempf, an attorney at the American Civil Liberties Union of Texas. “We know that outing children against their will places them at risk of rejection, abuse in the home, and places them at an elevated risk of homelessness.”

Resources for Katy ISD parents and students

Here is general guidance from the ACLU of Texas for students who are affected by discriminatory policies:

  • Stay calm and document everything that happens. If a teacher, principal, or another student says something to you, try to record it, write it down, or confirm any information via email
  • Support each other and stand up against bullying, harassment, and anti-LGBTQ+ policies
  • When possible, try to find supportive parents, friends, and adults. Be aware that some school staff members may share information you tell them with your parents or guardians, even if they are not permitted to do so under state law

Some resources from the ACLU of Texas:

That’s not rhetoric. It’s fact. While about 12.5 percent of 18- to 25-year-olds report that they’ve experienced homelessness at some point in their lives, the rate for transgender adults that age is nearly twice as high, at 23.5 percent.

Another fact: People who experience homelessness at younger ages are more likely to be chronically homeless throughout their lives.

Want another? The Trevor Project, a suicide-prevention nonprofit for LGBTQ+ youth, reports that LGBTQ+ youth who reported housing instability and homelessness are more than twice as likely to report depression, and nearly four times as likely to attempt suicide as those who did not experience housing instability.

In short, outing children to their family can set off a chain reaction of irreparable harm. And that, Kempf says, is a violation of the Texas Education Agency’s code of ethics, which states an educator “shall not intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly treat a student or minor in a manner that adversely affects or endangers the learning, physical health, mental health, or safety of the student or minor.”

And, Kempf notes, “outing a student against their will unfortunately does all of those things.”

The TEA did not respond to a request for comment about how Katy ISD’s actions square with the agency’s policies. Katy ISD’s spokesman, Craig Eichhorn, similarly didn’t respond to my messages.

And their silence speaks volumes.

I asked Kempf if she thinks there’s a possibility that perhaps most of these students’ parents already knew how their child identifies; if perhaps the district didn’t violate TEA policy, because all 19 of these families could, theoretically, be supportive.

According to the Trevor Project, 57 percent of parents would be comfortable if their child came out as transgender or nonbinary. That’s higher than I expected, to be honest. But it still means that more than 40 percent of parents would not be comfortable.

“Logistically, I don’t see how it’s possible for the school district to be able to know with the required level of certainty that outing a student will not lead to abuse or neglect or other forms of harm in the home,” Kempf says. “There’s just no way of knowing that in advance of making a disclosure like this, which is why we believe that the policy as written is in violation of the law, no matter how it’s enforced.”

Yes, the law. The ACLU contends that forced outings of children to their parents is a violation of students’ privacy rights.

“It’s a risk, coming out to anybody,” says Carrie Rai, the executive director of Tony’s Place, a nonprofit resource center for LGBTQ+ youth, based in Montrose. “They come out in their trusted safe space, and I can’t tell you what that safe space is to an individual, because it’s different for each person. And it should be that individual’s choice.”

Tony’s Place is what Rai calls a “safe haven” for LGBTQ+ youth under the age of 25, where they can come in to eat a hot meal, do laundry, find gender-affirming clothing, shower and work with case managers. Most of the youth are homeless, unstably housed or unsafely housed, Rai says. And, Rai says, “family rejection is the number one reason” the youth she works with find themselves without a safe and stable place to call home.

It’s not immediately clear if Katy ISD is the first school district in the state to forcibly out students. With more than 1,200 districts across Texas, Kempf says the ACLU can’t be certain of such a superlative. But she does know that it’s the state’s largest district to take such action. The same week Katy ISD passed its policy, California’s attorney general sued a school district outside Los Angeles in an attempt to block the district from acting on a similar policy that had recently passed.

That’s not going to happen here in Texas, where the state’s leadership has been nothing short of hostile to transgender youth. In the past couple years alone, the state legislature has limited life-saving, gender-affirming health care options for transgender youth and limited their ability to play sports. At the same time, a wave of book bans have removed representative stories from school shelves – including in Katy.

“This is bullying, masquerading as policy – targeting an already-marginalized group of young people in the state, and making their lives even worse,” says Kempf. “Essentially every aspect of life, of being a kid, and being a successful and healthy student is under attack.”

The act of outing kids is just the latest step in a forced march of cruelty.

The fact that this happened to 19 children violates more than just ethics codes and laws. It violates a fundamental human code of what it means to be good and decent. Even if Katy ISD had only sent home one notification these past two months, that would have been one too many.

Share your Houston stories with Maggie Gordon. Start on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram. Or you can email her at maggie@houstonlanding.org.

Why Christie suddenly cares about helping drug addicts

The U.S. has a long history of criminalizing drug addicts with lengthy prison sentences in lieu of rehabilitation or treatment. The tough on crime rhetoric has always been the go-to strategy for Republican politicians like Ronald Reagan, who famously signed mandatory minimums for drug abusers into law back in 1987. If someone had a drug problem, it was always seen as their fault and their lack of responsibility that led to the addiction.

Keep reading...Show less

Wisconsin school segregates genders because 'girls hear better' and 'boys are messy'

The ACLU has asked federal authorities to investigate a single-sex education program at a Wisconsin middle school for possible violations in gender equality.

Keep reading...Show less

Multimillionaire philanthropist leaps from his NYC high-rise after suffering stroke

Robert W. Wilson, a hedge fund manager and decades-long patron of the ACLU, committed suicide Monday by throwing himself from his luxury Central Park West high-rise apartment in New York into the courtyard.

Keep reading...Show less