Top Stories Daily Listen Now
RawStory

Latest Headlines

'That will end this': Trump warned to not push his luck with the Supreme Court

Acknowledging he is "cynical " enough to believe the conservative-majority Supreme Court will side with Donald Trump on a bevy of DOJ lawsuits appeals headed their way, former DOJ official Andrew Weissmann suggested there are a few the president might want to might want to nip in the bud to avoid a humiliating loss.

Speaking with the hosts of MSNBC's "The Weekend," he was asked about the president's growing legal problems as his policies are challenged in federal court.

Referring to the Supreme Court being the final stop, Weissmann was asked, "What should we expect there?"

ALSO READ: Trump's top spy chief blasted as Raw Story exposes 'crazy' cash grab

"I think some of them will definitely end up there," he began. "One thing to note about the judges, in spite of the administration saying these are activist judges, the judges who are ruling against the administration are from, you know, Democratic appointees, Republican appointees, you have Trump appointees. You have a unanimous Supreme Court decision saying that these people in El Salvador were entitled to due process and have to be given due process."

Pointing out that Trump has seen "judges who have just had it," with his flood of appeals, he singled out attempts to force law firms into submission.

"I think the orders where all judges have said the law firm orders, they are four executive orders that have all been struck down by the courts, left and right, so to speak. I don't think if the administration is smart, they're going to take that to the Supreme Court because that will end this," he predicted. "I mean, I think they will los and right now they're doing pretty well on just the sort of fear factor and the terrorizing effect of the executive orders, even though they keep on getting struck down unanimously."

You can watch here or at the link.

Keep reading... Show less

'Don't talk over me!' Fox News pundit blows up at Democrat during immigration spat

Republican pundit Ben Domenech yelled at Democratic strategist Leslie Marshall after she suggested that the Latino community did not agree with President Donald Trump's immigration policies.

During a Sunday panel discussion on Fox News, host Howard Kurtz noted that Trump was besieged with poor approval ratings as his administration hit 100 days.

Keep reading... Show less

Tiffany Trump father-in-law humiliated in his job as adviser to her father: report

The father-in-law of Donald Trump's lesser-known daughter is finding out the hard way that his appointment as an adviser to the president is less important than he apparently believed it would be.

According to a report from Politico, businessman Massad Boulos, father of Michael Boulos who married Tiffany Trump in 2022, was taken into the fold and given a job as senior adviser on the Middle East and Africa policy during the 2024 presidential transition and things have not panned out as expected.

Keep reading... Show less

Trump gets confused on TikTok: 'I have a warm spot in my heart for tic tac'

President Donald Trump said he could extend the deadline for a deal to spin off TikTok's U.S. assets because he has a "warm spot" in his heart for the social media platform.

"I have a little sweet spot in my heart because, as you know, I won young people by 36 points," Trump claimed after NBC host Kristen Welker asked him about TikTok. "No Republican ever won young people, and I won it by 36 points."

Keep reading... Show less

'Could happen': Trump won't 'rule out' US military invasion of Greenland

President Donald Trump suggested that the U.S. military could be used to take over Greenland.

During an interview broadcast by NBC on Sunday, Trump refused to back off his call for Canada and Greenland to join the United States.

Keep reading... Show less

Watch: GOP's Ron Johnson cornered by CNN's Tapper over IRS 'weaponization' rant

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) was put on the spot on CNN Sunday morning after "State of the Union" host Jake Tapper showed him a clip where Johnson was seen ranting and accusing former President Barack Obama using the IRS against his enemies.

He was then asked about Donald Trump's plans to do just that.

What followed was Johnson instead attempting to change the topic to America's tax laws in an effort to avoid criticizing the current Oval Office occupant.

ALSO READ: 'Sad white boys': Fear as Trump terror adviser shrugs off threat from 'inside the house'

In the clip shared by the CNN host, an animated Johnson accused, "My eyes began opening to this reality with the disclosure of how the Obama administration weaponized the IRS to harass Tea Party groups by denying them tax-exempt status."

"President Trump is out in the open, threatening to target Harvard; a move that the conservative editorial board of the Wall Street Journal says is unwise and sets a bad precedent," Tapper pressed his guest. "Do you oppose his [Trump's] instruction to the IRS to take away Harvard's tax-exempt status?"

"Well, first of all, what I would like to do is simplify and rationalize our tax code so we really don't try and socially and economically engineer the economy through the tax code," Johnson attempted. "It should be simple, it should be rational, it should raise the revenue. We have –– the tax exempt status of all kinds of entities, you kind of scratch your head. You know, so many of these entities, for example, universities pretty easy for them to not make a profit so what value does that tax-exempt status have?"

"Right," the CNN host agreed. "But President Trump is out there instructing his IRS to target Harvard and you've been very outspoken about when targeting was done of conservative groups during the Obama years, which he apologized for ultimately, and I'm wondering if you are also upset at at this."

"Well, in the past, people have used tax-exempt status on churches and religious universities as well," Johnson parried. "Again, that's why I don't like our complex tax code. I don't want anybody to be using the tax code in this type of manner and so what I'd say is let's simplify the tax code –– that's the solution here."

You can watch below or at the link:

Keep reading... Show less

'I don't know': Trump unsure if he needs to 'uphold the Constitution' as president

President Donald Trump revealed that he was unsure if he needed to "uphold the Constitution" as president of the United States.

During a Sunday interview, NBC host Kristen Welker asked Trump if he had the power to have El Salvador return Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man who was deported without due process.

Keep reading... Show less

JD Vance shot down by former Trump official over his Mike Waltz 'promotion' comments

A former official in Donald Trump's first administration who served as both national security adviser and ambassador to the United Nations shot down the spin from Vice President J.D. Vance that Mike Waltz was getting a "promotion" after being ousted from his advisory position.

Appearing on MSNBC's "The Weekend," John Bolton said there is no legitimate comparison between the two jobs.

Co-host Jonathan Capehart pressed his guest, "Let's talk about your other the other job you had that at least talked about in the intro. You were the United States ambassador, permanent representative to the United Nations. Vice President Vance is trying to is trying to spin Mike Waltz's nomination to be in the job you had as a promotion. I mean, on paper, it might it seems like a promotion from national security advisor. But you tell me, as someone who has been in both jobs."

ALSO READ: 'Sad white boys': Fear as Trump terror adviser shrugs off threat from 'inside the house'

"Look, I loved being U.N. ambassador, it's a great job, there's no question about it," Bolton replied. "But in terms of being able to influence policy, it's not even a close question."

"National security advisors is far more likely to be influential," he elaborated. "The office is only a couple of yards down the hall from the Oval Office, and the fact is the U.N. ambassador actually has a job to do, too, in addition to, to what? to what the what the level of the title may show."

"So I think if you took a survey and asked any, any number of national security-related people in Washington or around the country, they would overwhelmingly say that national security advisor was the more important job. I don't even think that's a close question," he added.

You can watch below or at the link.

Keep reading... Show less

'Such a dishonest interview': Trump gripes as NBC host points out rising prices

President Donald Trump complained that NBC host Kristen Welker was conducting a "dishonest interview" after she informed him prices were going up in the wake of his tariffs.

During an interview aired on Sunday, Welker noted that Trump recently admitted that the cost of toys could increase.

Keep reading... Show less

US Fed expected to pause cuts again and wait for clarity on tariffs

The US Federal Reserve is widely expected to extend a recent pause in rate cuts this week as it waits to see how President Donald Trump's stop-start tariff rollout affects the health of the world's largest economy.

Trump has imposed steep levies on China, and lower "baseline" levies of 10 percent on goods from most other countries, along with 25 percent duties on specific items like steel, automobiles and aluminum.

Keep reading... Show less

Sheinbaum says she nixed Trump offer to send US troops to Mexico

President Claudia Sheinbaum said Saturday that she had rejected an offer from US President Donald Trump to send American troops to Mexico to help combat drug trafficking.

"I told him, 'No, President Trump, our territory is inviolable, our sovereignty is inviolable, our sovereignty is not for sale,'" she said at a public event, referring to a recent report in The Wall Street Journal that described a tense exchange between the leaders.

Keep reading... Show less

Prepare for Trump to lose his mind on Sunday night: MSNBC host

Following a debate on MSNBC's "The Weekend" on whether former Vice President Mike Pence deserves to be the recipient of the John F. Kennedy Profile in Courage Award for his actions on Jan. 6th, co-host Jonathan Capehart stated he was more interested in how Donald Trump will react.

Pence will receive the award for “putting his life and career on the line” when he oversaw the certification of the 2020 presidential election results despite threats and pressure from Trump combined with an assault on the Capitol that forced lawmakers from both parties to flee.

Noting the award will be presented at the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum Sunday night in Boston, co-host Elise Jordan defended Pence, explaining, "I think the award is a good move just because it shows grace for anything –– what happened in the past, I'm not going to say I agreed with everything Mike Pence did as vice president certainly –– but the human capacity for change and how it is powerful when people step up and they do their job, which sometimes it is simply doing their job and not taking orders, and he could have taken orders and it could have been disastrous."

ALSO READ: 'Sad white boys': Fear as Trump terror adviser shrugs off threat from 'inside the house'

"Come on, Elise Oprah," co-host Eugene Daniels protested before laughing.

That was when Capehart jumped in, "You know, but you know the best –– come on –– I'm just going to speak for myself. But the thing I'm most looking forward to is the reaction of ––."

"Of who?" Daniels interrupted.

"President Trump! Because it's totally going to be..." Capehart responded as he mimed Trump's head exploding.

"True Social is going to be lighting up," Jordan interjected.

"Lit, as the kids would say," Capehart agreed.

You can watch below or at the link.

Keep reading... Show less

'Oh, come on': Trump's DOJ hamstrung by loss of credibility with judges

The deference that judges have traditionally extended to lawyers representing the Department of Justice (DOJ) has quickly evaporated under Donald Trump and his Attorney General Pam Bondi.

According to a report from the Washington Post, it has become a common occurrence for DOJ lawyers to be admonished byjudges over specious claims, "shoddy work" and their inability to answer simple questions from the bench.

As former federal Judge John E. Jones III, appointed to the bench by President George W. Bush, put it the “deference that judges would give to attorneys from Main Justice is evaporating,” and they have “lost a fair measure of their credibility.”

ALSO READ: 'Sad white boys': Fear as Trump terror adviser shrugs off threat from 'inside the house'

According to the Post's Mark Berman and Jeremy Roebuck, Lawyers defending Trump administration policies are "encountering mounting criticism and frustration from federal judges, a sign of deepening tension between the executive branch and courts weighing its aggressive uses of power," adding the example of U.S. District Judge John D. Bates berating a DOJ lawyer with "Oh, come on," during a hearing this past week.

Noting that Trump told ABC News this past week, “We’re not being treated fairly by all judges,” the Post report pointed out that "the pushback from the bench has come from judges appointed by Republican as well as Democratic presidents — including by Trump himself — suggesting the issue is more about the Justice Department’s evidence and court arguments than judicial activism."

The report goes on to note that frustrated judges "have criticized the statements and behavior of administration officials, accusing them of defying court orders, submitting flimsy evidence, providing inadequate answers to questions and even acting like toddlers."

You can read more here.