'This is huge': Expert gobsmacked as ICE abandons its mega-warehouse expansion plans

'This is huge': Expert gobsmacked as ICE abandons its mega-warehouse expansion plans
A demonstrator holds an anti-ICE sign during a protest against immigration enforcement operations by federal agents in the Albany Park neighborhood of Chicago, Illinois, U.S. June 3, 2026. REUTERS/Jim Vondruska

President Donald Trump's Immigration and Customs Enforcement has quietly started to "abandon" one of its big projects, The New York Times reported on Thursday — and one legal expert is gobsmacked at the reversal.

Specifically, after ICE spent around $1 billion to buy up nearly a dozen mega-warehouses that it planned to convert into detention centers, they are now trying to offload seven of them, either to other federal agencies or to private buyers.

This move, noted the report, "is a rejection of a signature initiative under the previous homeland security secretary, Kristi Noem, who pushed the boundaries of what the government can do to aggressively round up potential deportees," as newly appointed Secretary Markwayne Mullin "has said publicly that he wants the agency to be quieter about how it carries out immigration enforcement."

American Immigration Council senior fellow Aaron Reichlin-Melnick posted on X that the turnabout is a massive deal.

"This is HUGE," said Reichlin-Melnick. "After spending over $1 BILLION on the purchase of multiple commercial warehouses that ICE planned to convert into the largest jails/prisons in the nation, ICE is now largely abandoning the idea and will aim to sell off multiple warehouses at a loss."

Even before now, there were signs the federal government was abandoning the idea of converting warehouses to immigrant jails, and it ran into massive problems.

For one, in some cases ICE was prevented from buying warehouses in the first place because local owners opposed selling, or in one case in Oklahoma, a tribal nation bought it first to stop them. They also had to contend with lawsuits, including one brought by Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes.

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

Department of Justice lawyers ditching the Trump administration to work in a blue state took parting shots, according to a Democratic Attorney General.

During an appearance on the Legal AF podcast, Colorado AG Phil Weiser, who's running for governor in his state, detailed the "brain drain" at the DOJ as lawyers flee, with one prosecutor named Hagan Scotten telling his superiors that only "a fool or a coward" would work for Trump.

"Trump might find someone to do his bidding, but it was either going to be a fool or a coward, and it was never going to be me," Weiser said, quoting Scotten. "The people, like Mr. Scotten, who had integrity, they're leaving. They're often not being replaced."

Weiser said that the Colorado AG's office has already hired "over 22 people and counting from the federal government who want to stay in public service but can't be a part of an administration that is so lawless."

Weiser said, "We're hiring people from Main Justice, and we're hiring from Washington agencies, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, who basically have concluded, 'I can't do this anymore. I'm leaving.' And they look to Colorado."

Legal AF host Michael Popok brought up DOJ prosecutor Danielle Sassoon, a "shining star" from the Southern District of New York. Sassoon quit with an eight-page letter rather than follow orders to drop an indictment against New York Mayor Eric Adams. Emil Bove, the acting deputy attorney general, gave the orders, Popok noted.

"She was, by the way, Republican, an Orthodox Jewish woman that was destined to be the U.S. attorney in that office," Popok explained. "She left. She said, 'Dismiss the indictment?' as she was ordered to do by Emil Bove. 'Dismiss the indictment?' I'm ready to come get permission to bring a superseding indictment for more charges,' and then quit with an eight-page letter, which detailed everything."

Trump Freaks Out as States Hire DOJ Attorneys to Fight Against Trump DOJ! by Legal AF

Read on Substack

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

A CNN pundit couldn't believe the description of President Donald Trump's super glue fiasco revealed in an upcoming book.

The upcoming book Regime Change by New York Times reporters Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan detailed how White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt walked into the Oval Office to find Trump "clutching a tube of super glue and attempting to affix gold decorations to the marble fireplace mantle."

SE Cupp, a conservative political commentator, described the episode as "unfathomable" during an appearance on CNN on Thursday.

"It is unfathomable to imagine a U.S. president super-gluing anything in the Oval Office," Cupp said. "That's wacko, but it's easier to imagine this president doing it."

She added that, "It's the perfect metaphor" for the Trump presidency, "as so many things are, from the Reflecting Pool to the ballroom," referring to two embattled and lavish Trump projects.

"Trump came up in business by putting his name on buildings," Cupp said. "He didn't have to own them superficially. He was looking to look powerful and important."

She admitted that the image of Trump gluing gold decorations onto the Oval Office actually "makes perfect sense."

The Alaska Division of Elections took action to disqualify a man named Dan Sullivan from running on the ballot against the incumbent Republican senator of the same name — but a lawyer advising the state legislature is now warning this was probably illegal.

According to Alaska Public Media, "Andrew Dunmire, an attorney with the nonpartisan Legislative Affairs Agency, wrote a nearly five-page memo on the controversy." According to the report, the other Sullivan, who lives in Petersburg, "appears to meet the three qualifications the U.S. Constitution requires of senators, Dunmire said: He’s over 30, a U.S. citizen for nine years or more, and a state resident."

The Division of Elections ruled Sullivan ineligible because he had not filed in "good faith," and there was strong evidence he was deliberately trying to confuse voters into splitting the vote to boost Democrats.

But that isn't a valid disqualification reason, Dunmire argued: “To impose additional requirements on Mr. Sullivan — such as a requirement that he filed to run ‘in good faith’ — would improperly add to the exclusive list of Constitutional qualifications.”

Additionally, Dunmire argued, the Division of Elections made the opposite argument in 2024, "when the Division argued in court that it had to let Eric Hafner, a federal inmate in New York, appear on the Alaska ballot as a Democrat," potentially taking votes away from other Democratic candidates, despite the state Democratic Party complaining he wouldn't meet the residency requirement because of the length of his sentence.

The other Sullivan, who is also running as a Republican denies that he is a Democratic plant or that his candidacy is meant to deceive anyone, and Dunmire argued that there are sensible compromises where Sullivan could be allowed onto the ballot but displayed in a way that voters would not confuse him for the sitting senator.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}