Top Stories Daily Listen Now
RawStory
RawStory

Beauty queen stripped of crown for racist tweets takes over state GOP's digital media

In 2019, Kathy Zhu had her title of Miss Michigan beauty queen taken from her due to offensive tweets deemed by many to be racist and Islamophobic. Almost seven years later, she’s handling digital media for the Michigan House Republicans.

Zhu has been employed as digital strategist director for the Republican Central Staff at the Michigan House of Representatives under Speaker Matt Hall since August 2025. The fact that Zhu has held the job without any public outcry might be an indicator of how thoroughly the far right has infiltrated the Michigan GOP.

“It’s very feasible that she might not feel pressure to disavow the views that she had,” Ben Lorber, a senior research analyst at Political Research Associates, told Raw Story. “It might help her brand to be able to say to the Michigan GOP that she’s able to tap into edgy, young, right-wing culture.”

Zhu’s rehabilitation from disgraced beauty queen to Republican state legislative aide offers an example of a Generation Z conservative who responded to public censure by doubling down on extremism, while finding acceptance from the GOP establishment.

Then the president of the College Republicans at the University of Michigan, where she was studying political science, and an avid supporter of President Donald Trump, Zhu was forced to relinquish the title of Miss Michigan after the Miss World America organization deemed her anti-Black and anti-Muslim tweets to violate its rules on “good character.”

The tweets that Miss World America flagged as “offensive, insensitive and inappropriate” included one calling on Black Lives Matter activists to address crime within the Black community before protesting police violence, and another accusing Muslim students celebrating World Hijab Day of “trying to get women used to being oppressed under Islam.”

Other tweets from Zhu’s now-suspended account, which have been archived, are even more provocative.

Zhu described Adolf Hitler as “very smart and a good public speaker” in a 2017 tweet that appears to be framed as a rhetorical parry against criticism leveled at Trump for praising North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un as a “tough cookie” and a “smart guy.”

In another tweet that appears to argue against equating white supremacist violence with Islamic extremism, Zhu posted: “KKK DOESN’T BLOW UP ARENAS AND SHOUT IN THE NAME OF JESUS.” The Ku Klux Klan’s history since its founding is replete with acts of terrorism, intimidation and murder, including the 1963 bombing of the Sixteenth Street Baptist Church in Birmingham, Alabama, resulting in the deaths of four Black girls. Klan members have historically cloaked their violence in Christian rhetoric.

Rather than apologize in the aftermath of the Miss Michigan controversy, Zhu went on a media tour, telling CNN in one interview, “I stand behind every tweet that I post.”

Zhu’s appearance on Fox News’ “Fox and Friends” got the attention of Trump, who singled her out at Turning Point USA’s Teen Student Action Summit in Washington, DC.

“What they did to this young lady was terrible,” Trump said, adding that it “was pretty cool” that she had worn a “Make America Great Again” hat on “Fox and Friends.”

With her newfound notoriety following the controversy, Zhu networked with an array of influencers to the right of the mainstream MAGA movement and Turning Point USA, the pro-Trump group led by the late Charlie Kirk.

Zhu reportedly attended a dinner in September 2019 with Nick Fuentes and other far-right luminaries described by People for the American Way as “white nationalist and anti-Semitic content creators.” Turning Point USA severed ties with one of its brand ambassadors who attended the dinner, while denouncing white nationalism as “abhorrent and un-American.”

At the time, Fuentes, a rising influencer with a history of questioning the Holocaust and praising Hitler, was dispatching his followers to Turning Point USA events to heckle speakers and pose questions intended to embarrass them over their support for Israel in a campaign known as the “Groyper wars.”

At the time of the September 2019 dinner with Zhu, Fuentes had recently attacked a conservative commentator for condemning a mass murder carried out by a white supremacist targeting Latinos at a Walmart in El Paso, Texas. Fuentes, during a livestream that was apparently cut from his podcast, reportedly called Matt Walsh a “shabbos goy race traitor” who worked for Jews. Walsh was employed by the Daily Caller, owned by Ben Shapiro.

Fuentes has said that he and Zhu were in contact during the weeks leading up to the Jan. 6, 2021 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol and that he later saw her in Orlando, Florida. Fuentes' comments don’t explain the circumstances of the meeting, but his group, America First Political Action Committee, hosted conferences in Orlando in February 2021 and February 2022.

It’s unclear whether Zhu and Fuentes have remained in contact.

While working as a scheduler and director of operations for Rep. Ronny Jackson (R-TX) from 2022 to 2025, Zhu maintained a relatively low profile and stayed out of the headlines. In a 2025 LinkedIn post, Zhu said she had earned a master of arts in global security studies from Johns Hopkins University and was undergoing “spiritual transformation” as a convert to Catholicism.

Zhu could not be reached for this story. While she has not publicly renounced any of the views expressed in her past social media posts, it’s unclear whether she still holds them. It’s also unclear whether she views herself as being aligned with Fuentes and his Groyper movement.

Regardless, the views of someone like Fuentes, who dined with Trump in 2022, are no longer out of line in the Republican Party. By early 2024, Kirk, formerly the standard-bearer of youth conservatism in the Trump era and the one-time target of Fuentes’ attacks, had voiced white nationalist talking points. Conservative writer Rod Dreher reported last November that a D.C. insider estimated that "between 30 and 40 percent of of the Zoomers who work in official Washington are fans of Nick Fuentes."

“I can say since 2019 the spectrum of respectable, young, conservative opinion has gotten closer to Nick Fuentes,” Lorber said. “For someone like [Zhu], a past association with Nick Fuentes is really not much of a deal-breaker in the way it might have once been.”

The office of Michigan House Speaker Matt Hall did not respond to messages from Raw Story inquiring whether he was aware of Zhu’s history of losing her Miss Michigan title for her controversial social media posts at the time she was hired for the job of digital strategist director.

Hall, whose party took control of the Michigan House in January 2025, has not shied from controversy. In Trumpy fashion, he reportedly attacked a Democratic colleague by calling her “a very low IQ representative” and “probably one of the dumbest ones in the legislature” during a weekly press conference last year.

Hall held on to his leadership position over the objections of at least one of his Republican colleagues after the Daily Beast reported that he was accused of domestic violence against his girlfriend and interfering with a 911 call in 2019, but was never charged.

Hall has also acknowledged sending an email threatening to kill a college student in 2001, although he told the police he did not actually have any intent to harm the recipient. Hall reportedly wrote in the email, “We are going to impose our Southern ways on you! I’ve got a shotgun rifle and I just put a bullet in it with your name on it!”

Since 2019, views once considered taboo, such as the idea that America should be a Christian nation and that white people are being replaced, have become widely accepted in the Republican Party.

“She may very well be encouraging Michigan politicians to adopt some of that edgy, right-wing culture to connect with young conservatives,” Lorber said. “It might even be a benefit for her to say that she’s been an influencer. It really doesn’t matter if she’s secretly a Groyper, or has no connection to those views. There’s such a wide acceptance of the views that used to be considered beyond the pale that she can fit comfortably in the young GOP.”

Trump's latest move delights Neo-Nazis: 'It's a win for us'

As Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and FBI Director Kash Patel announced an indictment against the Southern Poverty Law Center on charges of wire fraud for its informant program to infiltrate extremist groups, the news was greeted in neo-Nazi accelerationist circles with glee.

“Frankly, it’s a win for us as we see it,” a Telegram channel for The American Futurist, propaganda project, posted as the news broke on Tuesday. “Let them have their news spectacle; we get the benefit of fewer traitorous snakes in the movement….”

With Patel standing at his side, Blanche charged during the press conference that the Southern Poverty Law Center, known as the SPLC, was “manufacturing the extremism it purports to oppose by paying sources to stoke racial hatred.”

Patel echoed that talking point in an appearance on Fox News’ “Hannity” on Wednesday, claiming that the SPLC paid informants inside extremism organizations “specifically for the reason to sow discord and hate into our society.”

The American Futurist channel, authored by former members of the now-defunct accelerationist group Atomwaffen, which is tied to at least five murders, scoffed at the notion that the extremism watchdog group is secretly an ally to violent white supremacists.

“The SPLC was not funding racist groups to enable their racism — they, in fact, were not funding racist groups at all,” the American Futurist-linked TAF Private channel posted. “What they were doing was funding bad actors within groups, with the intention of destroying those groups from the inside.”

The post speculated that the prosecution was motivated by the desire to “kill two birds with one stone: arrest pro-Palestine leftists and smear the US [neo-Nazi] movement as controlled opposition.

“So, do we mind?” the post continued. “No, not at all. We can take the PR hit, and to be frank, any snitches who get rounded up on charges with the SPLC absolutely deserve what they get….”

The Department of Justice press release quotes Patel as saying that while the SPLC was “vowing to dismantle violent extremist groups,” the nonprofit instead “paid the leaders of these very extremist groups — even utilizing the funds to have these groups facilitate the commission of state and federal crimes.”

The FBI and Department of Justice sidestepped multiple requests from Raw Story for information to substantiate Patel and Blanche’s claims that the funds SPLC paid to informants were used to commit crimes or otherwise manufactured extremism.

The 14-page indictment merely states that the money spent to pay informants “was then used for the benefit of the individuals as well as the violent extremist groups.”

The indictment alleges that the informants “engaged in the active promotion of racist groups.” One informant said to be involved in the planning chats for the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville allegedly “made racist postings under the supervision of the SPLC and helped coordinate transportation to the event for several attendees.”

Engaging in racist speech and logistical activities are consistent with the activities of informants used by the FBI itself in its infiltration of violent white supremacist groups going back to the 1960s.

As described in the indictment, the activities of at least one informant appear to undercut the government’s case that the payments benefited the extremist groups. The indictment alleges that the informant, said to be an affiliate of the National Alliance, stole 25 boxes of documents from the group, which were then used to source a story published on the SPLC’s “Hatewatch” website.

“The use of informants was necessary because we are no stranger to threats of violence,” Bryan Fair, SPLC’s interim CEO, said in a video posted on the organization’s website on Tuesday. “In 1983, our offices were firebombed, and in the years since, there have been countless credible threats against our staff. For decades, we engaged in unprecedented litigation to dismantle the Klan and other hate groups.”

Beginning in the 1980s under the leadership of co-founder Morris Dees, the SPLC sued a succession of violent white supremacist groups and effectively shut them down.

In 1984, the SPLC joined a lawsuit against the United Klans of America for its role in the lynching of Michael Donald in Mobile in 1981. Three years later, a jury awarded Donald’s mother $7 million, bankrupting one of the most violent Klan factions, whose members were responsible for the 1963 bombing of the Sixteenth Street Baptist Church in Birmingham that resulted in the deaths of four Black girls, and the 1965 murder of civil rights activist Viola Liuzzo. (Gary Thomas Rowe Jr., one of the Klansmen indicted for Liuzzo’s murder, was an FBI informant.)

To satisfy the judgement in the Donald lawsuit, the United Klans was forced to turn over its Tuscaloosa, Ala. headquarters to Donald’s mother, and she was able to buy her first home with the proceeds from the sale.

In 1990, lawyers for the SPLC, along with the Anti-Defamation League, sued neo-Nazi leader Tom Metzger and his group White Aryan Resistance for inciting followers in the death of an Ethiopian immigrant, Mulugeta Seraw, who was beaten to death in Portland, Ore. The jury awarded the plaintiffs $12.5 million, and attorneys foreclosed on Metzger’s house to collect the judgement.

Nearly a decade later, the SPLC sued the Aryan Nations on behalf of a mother and son who were assaulted by the group’s security forces. Shortly after arriving in northern Idaho in 1980 to establish its compound, members of the group reportedly vandalized a Jewish-owned restaurant with swastikas. The Aryan Nations spawned a terrorist spinoff group called the Order that was responsible a murder and a spree of bombings and armed car robberies in the 1980s.

The jury decision in 2000 to award the plaintiffs $6.3 million forced Aryan Nations leader Richard Butler to declare bankruptcy. His group was forced to turn its compound over to the plaintiffs, and funds from the sale of the property were used to build a human rights center in nearby Coeur D’Alene.

ICE blunder frees suspected kidnapper — twice

MORRISVILLE, N.C. — When the Department of Homeland Security surged federal agents into North Carolina last November, they pledged to “target criminal aliens” and go after “the worst of the worst — including murderers, rapists, and pedophiles.”

But in one case reviewed by Raw Story, federal immigration authorities received a tip about a 24-year-old Guatemalan national suspected of involvement in the kidnapping and rape of a 16-year-old girl — and they repeatedly missed the opportunity to detain him, despite him being in police custody.

Federal immigration authorities appear to have learned about Maynor Godinez-Mendez when a detective with the Fuquay-Varina Police Department contacted the FBI’s Human Trafficking Division. When Godinez-Mendez was interviewed following his arrest on suspicion of contributing to the delinquency of a minor, a federal Homeland Security Investigations agent was present and translated.

Even after Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, received a notification from a detention officer that he was in a local jail, they still failed to take Godinez-Mendez into custody, and he was released on his own recognizance four hours later.

The day after Godinez-Mendez’s release from jail, the Department of Homeland Security announced “Operation Charlotte’s Web.” Border Patrol “stormed” North Carolina’s largest city “in unmarked SUVs and masks, sweeping up hundreds of people,” as described in the Charlotte Observer. In the midst of the five-day blitz, the operation briefly expanded into the booming area about 150 miles to the northeast surrounding the state capitol of Raleigh, which includes Fuquay-Varina.

Chafed by the agency’s fumbled response involving Godinez-Mendez, an ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations supervisor tasked a team with apprehending the suspect. But based on faulty intelligence, ICE staked out the wrong house.

During an arrest operation on Dec. 2, 2025, agents in unmarked SUVs converged on a different man and blocked him at the entrance of a shopping center in Morrisville. When the man tried to back up and drive away, an agent rammed his car through a hedgerow, spun the vehicle around, and pushed it into a parked car.

The driver was not Godinez-Mendez, but rather another Guatemalan. His name was Milton Roblero.

When the agents took Roblero into custody, they determined that he had an outstanding order for deportation. Federal prosecutors charged him with forcibly assaulting a federal officer with a deadly weapon and willfully damaging government property.

Roblero’s lawyer filed a motion to dismiss, while questioning whether the agent who rammed his vehicle “violated ICE’s own policy and regulations restricting offensive driving techniques.” The shopping center includes a daycare, and the motion contends that ICE policy prohibits using offensive driving techniques “in school zones where children are present or going to or from school or where the danger to the public outweighs the enforcement benefit.”

Surveillance video shows ICE ramming Milton Roblero's vehicle during his arrest in Morrisville, N.C. on Dec. 2, 2025. (federal courts) roar-assets-auto.rbl.ms

The government did not directly address the question of whether ICE violated its policies, only saying in a court filing that the agents’ use of a vehicle for an administrative arrest was “appropriate.” But a filing in federal court on Monday indicates the government agreed to plead down the charges to a misdemeanor for impeding federal immigration officers’ traffic interdiction efforts. The agreement notes that Roblero will be removed to Guatemala following resolution of federal charges.

Andreina Malki, the defense manager for the immigrant advocacy group Siembra NC, told Raw Story Roblero’s arrest fits a pattern of unsafe activity by ICE.

“They used unmarked vehicles that don’t have any indication that they might be ICE,” she said. “If you’re a person driving, and unmarked cars try to block you in, you would probably try to leave. The fact that he got rammed and then got a charge for using his vehicle as a weapon — the story doesn’t add up. It’s not clear to the people being stopped who’s stopping them.”

Lindsay Williams, an ICE spokesperson, told Raw Story he couldn’t speak to the specifics of Roblero’s arrest.

A missing person case leads to a call to the FBI’s Human Trafficking Division

The circumstances that led to Roblero’s arrest began three weeks earlier with a missing person case that developed into a kidnapping and rape investigation.

Police in Fuquay-Varina, a town on the southwestern fringe of Raleigh, received a frantic phone call from a woman who reported that her 16-year-old daughter was missing (Raw Story is withholding the girl’s name because she is a juvenile). According to the police investigative report obtained through federal court filings, the daughter had texted: “Mommy and Daddy, I’m sorry for doing this to you, and well, I’m not coming home. I love you all very much.” The mother’s calls went straight to voicemail.

After interviewing the girl’s younger cousins, the police were able to get the name of a former boyfriend, then a residential address, and ultimately a description of a vehicle registered to the address. Using a law enforcement database, the police determined that the vehicle, a 2012 Hyundai Accent, had been repeatedly observed at an apartment complex in Cary, a nearby city.

Two Fuquay-Varina police officers went to the apartment complex the day after the 16-year-old girl had disappeared. As the officers were speaking with two females, the 16-year-old girl walked out of the apartment. She told the officers that the owner of the Hyundai was “Maynor,” and that he was in the car with another man named “William” when they picked her up.

Initially, the 16-year-old girl told the police that she had run away because of problems at home, and that nothing happened to her at the apartment. She said she had only watched TV and slept.

But on Nov. 13, two days after the 16-year-old girl was returned to her family, she told Cpl. Cassaundra Sullivan that William Godinez-Ramirez had called her and told her to go to an Indian grocery store. When she got into the car, according to Sullivan’s notes, Godinez-Ramirez told the 16-year-old girl to throw her phone out the window. She refused, and Godinez-Ramirez reportedly got out of the car, opened her door, grabbed the phone and threw it away. The girl told the officer that another man, Maynor Godinez-Mendez, and his wife were also in the car. They drove to a car wash, switched cars, and drove on to the apartment in Cary.

Summarizing what Sullivan learned from her interview, Detective Salvatore Fundaro wrote that the 16-year-old girl “reported that Godinez-Ramirez raped her” and “also reported that Godinez-Ramirez told her that he was going to kill her family if she didn’t leave with him.”

Fundaro consulted with the Wake County District Attorney’s Office, and he said he was advised to keep investigating before charging with rape and kidnapping, but he swore out warrants for contributing to the delinquency of a minor for both Godinez-Ramirez and Godinez-Mendez.

The federal authorities appear to have learned about the investigation of the two men on Nov. 12. That day, Fundaro wrote, he contacted the FBI’s Human Trafficking Division for assistance with the case. What raised his suspicions was that the 16-year-old girl had told her parents that she was going to a job, but her employer told the detective she hadn’t shown up for work for the past three months.

On the same day, a federal immigration officer signed a Department of Homeland Security administrative arrest warrant for Godinez-Mendez.

Accompanied by the Homeland Security Investigations agent, Fundaro interviewed Godinez-Mendez at the Morrisville Police Department. Godinez-Mendez “could not offer a logical reason as to why they switched vehicles,” Fundaro wrote. The detective asked if the reason was “because they knew they had committed a crime and wanted to avoid apprehension,” but Godinez-Mendez denied that.

Susan Weis, a spokesperson for the town of Fuquay-Varina said she was unable to comment because the case remains under investigation. The town also cannot “comment on another agency’s procedures,” she said.

Godinez-Mendez wound up spending six hours in the Wake County Detention Center, but ICE did not respond to a detainer inquiry from the jail or take the opportunity to place him in custody.

“Immigration warrants take a back seat to criminal charges,” Williams, the ICE spokesman, told Raw Story. “If he was arrested for something serious, we would let that process play out.”

Williams’ statement appears to be at odds with the bellicose language in the DHS press release, issued the day after Godinez-Mendez’s release, that takes aim at “criminal aliens” and “sanctuary politicians.”

“Americans should be able to live without fear of violent criminal illegal aliens hurting them, their families, or their neighbors,” then-Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said. “We are surging law enforcement to Charlotte to ensure Americans are safe and public safety threats are removed. There have been too many victims of criminal illegal aliens. President Trump and [former] Secretary [Kristi] Noem will step up to protect Americans when sanctuary politicians won’t.”

Only slightly more than half the people detained by federal immigration agents during “Operation Charlotte’s Web” had a criminal record, according to data recently released by the Deportation Data Project.

Asked to reconcile the seeming contradiction between the administration’s rhetoric about targeting the most serious criminals and the imperative to let charges play out in state courts, Williams said: “We’re going to deport him, whether it’s now or seven years from now. We ideally want folks to be held accountable for their crimes. The deportation order doesn’t expire. The system will take effect.”

‘I want to get hands on him’

The morning of Godinez-Mendez’s release from the Wake County Detention Center, an immigration agent identified in emails obtained by Raw Story by the initials “CD” forwarded the detainer inquiry to an ICE supervisor.

“Here is the lead you forwarded to us but not in custody,” the agent wrote.

The supervisor, identified only by the initials “SC,” forwarded the message to another agent.

“Biometrics did not hit as expected,” the supervisor wrote. “I wish we had a heads up. Magistrate bonded him out last night. He was there for 6 hours. They only charged him with contributing to the delinquency of a minor.

“I want to get hands on him,” the message continued. “What can you provide to assist? His booking record has an address in Morrisville. Work location? Vehicle info?”

An email shows an ICE supervisor expressing disappointment that they did not take Maynor Godinez-Mendez into custody before he was released from the Wake County Detention Center on Nov. 14, 2025.Federal courts

On Nov 29, an ICE agent conducted surveillance on the house in Morrisville, observing through binoculars from a distance of 200 yards away. The agent watched an individual identified as “Target 1” leave the house and drive away in a red Honda Civic, and also leave the house and get into a white truck. It’s unclear who the agent actually saw.

After the ICE agent witnessed a man leave the house and drive away in a red Honda Civic on Dec. 2, he radioed the arrest team — eight agents, including three on loan from Homeland Security Investigations. Given Godinez-Mendez’s “pattern of life,” the agents anticipated that he would drive to the nearby shopping center.

But the man they arrested was not Godinez-Mendez.

ICE ageents rammed Milton Roblero's red Honda through a hedgerow and spun it around before arresting him in Morrisville, N.C. on Dec. 2, 2025.Federal courts

None of the federal court documents or local police investigative reports reviewed by Raw Story implicate Milton Roblero, the man arrested by ICE on Dec. 2, in the kidnapping and rape investigation

About three weeks later, the real suspect was arrested on state criminal charges of felony conspiracy and felonious restraint. On the same day he was booked, for the second time, in the Wake County Detention Center, a magistrate issued a 48-hour hold to allow ICE to take him into custody.

ICE did not respond. On Dec. 28, he was released on a $25,000 bond.

Following his indictment in February, Godinez-Mendez was finally deported by Homeland Security Investigations, Melanie Shekita, a Wake County prosecutor, told Raw Story.

Disgraced Venezuelan generals accused of seeking Trump deal with election conspiracy lies

While Donald Trump’s polling numbers continue to slip amidst a rudderless and costly war with Iran that is sending gas prices soaring, he appears to be laying the groundwork to intervene in the upcoming midterm elections with a steady drip of rhetorical provocations and administrative actions.

And, while he claims not to be considering calling a pre-election national emergency, at least two former Venezuelan military officials have offered intelligence that fits a scheme long embraced by election conspiracists for the president to seize extraordinary powers based on the claim of foreign interference.

Hugo Carvajal Barrios, a retired general and the former head of Venezuelan military intelligence who faces life in prison after pleading guilty to narco-terrorism, said in an open letter to Trump that “regime operatives maintain relationships with election officials and voting-machine companies inside your country.

“I do not claim that every election is stolen, but I state with certainty that elections can be rigged with the software — and it has been used to do so,” Carvajal Barrios said in the letter, which was first published by the conservative outlet Dallas Express.

Clíver Alcalá Cordones, a former Venezuelan general who is currently serving a sentence of more than 20 years for material support for terrorists, has similarly offered to testify in an open letter to Trump about alleged election fraud. Alcalá Cordones’ letter also claims that Delcy Rodriguez, who took power in the country after the U.S. military seized former President Nicolás Maduro, and her brother Jorge retain control of a vast election-rigging apparatus with the ability to alter elections outside of Venezuela.

Election deniers have reportedly circulated a draft executive order in recent months urging Trump to declare a national emergency based on a claim that China interfered in the 2020 election, which is contradicted by the official findings of the U.S. intelligence community.

Peter Ticktin, a Florida lawyer who represents election denier Patrick Byrne in a defamation lawsuit brought by Liberty Voting (formerly Dominion Voting System), is among those who have reportedly worked on the proposed executive order. Byrne participated in a December 2020 meeting at the White House in which Trump was urged to seize voting machines and deploy the National Guard to re-run the election. Byrne told Raw Story he is part of a group that approached Carvajal Barrios in prison.

In February, Trump told podcaster Dan Bongino that Republicans should “take over the voting” in at least 15 states and “nationalize” elections. Last week, he issued an executive order that was not as far-reaching as the one promoted by Ticktin, but that nonetheless requires states to establish voting lists by cross-referencing data from the Social Security Administration and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, which is housed by the Department of Homeland Security.

Voting rights groups, joined by national Democratic Party organizations and attorneys general, promptly sued to block the executive order, arguing that “the order violates and subverts the separation of powers by lawlessly arrogating to the president authority to declare election rules and dictate election administration outcomes down to the individual voter by executive fiat.”

Max Flugrath, spokesperson for the voting rights group Fair Fight Action, said it wouldn’t surprise him if Venezuela winds up playing a role in Trump’s efforts to meddle in the midterm elections.

“Trump appears to be increasingly desperate to interfere with the 2026 election,” Flugrath told Raw Story. “The voter suppression SAVE Act has stalled, his demand to rig voting maps has fallen short of the blowout Republicans needed, and the far-right Supreme Court justices haven’t ruled on cases Republicans see as critical to their victory. After his executive order — which is so blatantly unconstitutional it should be considered an angry press release — I wouldn’t put anything past him.”

Asked if the president is considering issuing a national emergency order on security grounds to deploy federal assets during the midterms, the White House referred Raw Story to a comment Trump made to a reporter in February in which he said, “No, I’ve never heard of that.”

He also asked the reporter: “Who told you that?”

The White House did not respond to Raw Story’s question about whether Trump has reviewed the open letters from Carvajal Barrios and Alcalá Cordones.

As previously reported by Raw Story, Markwayne Mullin, now secretary of Homeland Security, helped a consultant linked to Byrne arrange a meeting with the Trump campaign to discuss election fraud and Venezuela in October 2024.

Actionable intelligence on Tren de Aragua

Gary Berntsen, a retired CIA senior operations officer who is part of Byrne’s group, directly appealed to Trump in a video posted in June 2025, as Carvajal Barrios was preparing to go on trial in Manhattan.

“Carvajal’s firsthand testimony is key to prosecuting the conspirators involved in stealing the 2020 election,” Berntsen said. He went on to ask Trump for his “intervention to force [the Southern District of New York] to seek to delay the trial long enough to explore the value of this critical witness.”

Berntsen said in the video that he has been “leading a dedicated team of whistleblowers, who have uncovered critical information about the 2020 election fraud, which we’ve shared with the Department of Justice and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.”

To establish his bona fides, Berntsen said in the video that he had “provided the first reports on the dangerous Tren de Aragua gang to U.S. law enforcement.”

Trump made the Tren de Aragua a campaign issue by insisting during his September 2024 debate with Vice President Kamala Harris that the Venezuelan gang was “taking over” Aurora, Colo. — a claim sharply contested by local officials. During the debate, Trump paired the statement about Tren de Aragua with an outlandish claim that Haitian refugees in Springfield, Ohio were “eating the pets.”

Shortly after taking office, Trump made Tren de Aragua the centerpiece of his mass deportation campaign, claiming that the gang was part of an invasion of the United States while invoking the Alien Enemies Act to provide justification for a military response. The administration followed through with military action by launching an ongoing campaign to bomb alleged drug boats in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific in September 2025.

Once Trump took office, federal prosecutors were instructed to prioritize Tren de Aragua, even though one former counternarcotics official told ProPublica the gang “was not anywhere close to the scale or impact of the cartels we were focused on.”

‘Managing a river of information’

In text messages to Raw Story, Byrne promoted the notion that his team has provided the Trump administration with an alternative stream of intelligence outside of the formal U.S. intelligence channels that presidents typically rely upon to set foreign policy.

“We have been part of managing a river of information coming out of Venezuelan government officials,” Byrne said. “Using those same defectors, we’ve been bribing police captains and military generals…. It is getting funneled directly into the Pentagon, those involved with using it, rather than to the normal organizations such as the FBI or CIA (of whom I do not trust anymore).”

Asked if the administration relied on intelligence from Byrne’s team to designate Tren de Aragua as a foreign terrorist organization, bomb alleged drug boats in the Caribbean, or carry out the military operation against Maduro, Byrne said they had nothing to do with the boat bombings. Otherwise, he said he could neither confirm nor deny those matters.

The White House and Department of Defense did not specifically respond to questions from Raw Story about whether they have received information from Byrne’s group, although Trump has amplified an interview with Berntsen discussing drug cartels, election fraud and foreign influence on his TruthSocial account.

Repeated sentencing delays

Carvajal Barrios wound up pleading guilty to conspiracy to import cocaine into the United States and engaging in narco-terrorism for the benefit of Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia, or the FARC, a group that was on the U.S. State Department’s list of foreign terrorist organizations from 1997 to 2021. Carvajal Barrios’ plea was entered only two days after the video of Berntsen’s plea to Trump was posted on YouTube, and there is no indication the president intervened in the prosecution.

As a result of his conviction, DEA Acting Administrator Robert Murphy declared in a press release issued by the Department of Justice that “Carvajal Barrios will now likely spend the rest of his life in federal prison.”

Carvajal Barrios was initially scheduled to be sentenced in October 2025, but about a month before the hearing, federal prosecutors asked for a delay on the basis that they expected him to object to some of the facts in his pre-sentence report. Since then, a federal judge in Manhattan has postponed Carvajal Barrios’ sentence three times, and the date is currently set for April 16.

Last December, while Carvajal Barrios was awaiting sentencing, his letter alleging election fraud related to Venezuela went public. Less than a week later, the Dallas Express published a letter from another former Venezuelan military official, Alcalá Cordones, who is currently serving a sentence of more than 20 years in prison for material support for the FARC. Using strikingly similar language, both letters specifically mentioned the election technology company Smartmatic.

The claims from the former Venezuelan military officials come at a time when Smartmatic and another voting technology company Liberty Voting (formerly Dominion Voting System) are racking up a string of legal victories against media companies and conspiracy theorists who promoted claims of election fraud during the 2020 election.

‘Statements regarding Smartmatic… are factually false’

Last September, a federal judge in Minnesota granted summary judgment to Smartmatic by finding there is no truth to three claims made by conspiracist Mike Lindell: "(1) that Smartmatic stole the 2020 election or otherwise manipulated ballots that changed the outcome of the 2020 election; (2) that Smartmatic [ballot marking devices] were connected to the internet and, therefore, susceptible to hacking; and (3) that Smartmatic designed its machines to manipulate ballots and change election results."

A judge in Delaware similarly ruled in a defamation suit brought by the election company against the far-right network Newsmax that “statements regarding Smartmatic software or voting machines altering the results of the election are factually false.”

Smartmatic currently has a $2.7 billion defamation case pending against Fox News. The network previously settled a lawsuit brought by Dominion for $787 million. Fox made little effort to defend the claims about election fraud, arguing instead that it was merely reporting on assertions made by Trump and his allies. A judge found that Fox “failed to meet its burden” to show a genuine issue of material fact as to falsity.

Among claims ruled as false, the order included at least seven statements by Trump allies between Nov. 13 and Dec. 10, 2020 that asserted that Smartmatic’s voting software was created in Venezuela to rig elections and was then exported to the United States, where it was used to manipulate the 2020 election.

The letters from Carvajal Barrios and Alcalá Cordones stop short of claiming that Smartmatic switched votes during the 2020 election in the United States, but appear to suggest a potential for manipulation in the future.

“The Smartmatic system can be altered — this is a fact,” Carvajal Barrios’ letter states. “This technology was later exported abroad, including to the United States. Regime operatives maintain relationships with election officials and voting-machine companies inside your country. I do not claim that every election is stolen, but I state with certainty that elections can be rigged with the software — and has been used to do so.”

Similarly, Alcalá Cordones’ letter states: “I am aware of the use of parallel Smartmatic voting systems to alter results, especially in locations without opposition party representatives, making irregularities difficult to detect. This is the same technology used in other countries including USA by the company Smartmatic. The controllers of this entire system are the siblings Jorge and Delcy Rodriguez.”

Samira Saba, a spokesperson for Smartmatic, told Raw Story the company “vehemently rejects the completely baseless and repeatedly debunked accusations about the integrity of our election systems, purportedly made by former Venezuelan officials convicted of serious charges.

“Giving credibility to these discredited narratives erodes public trust in elections,” Saba said. “The real threat to U.S. election integrity is the acceptance of such falsehoods at face value, especially when they originate from individuals openly attempting to bargain for leniency.”

Robert Feitel, Carvajal Barrios’ lawyer, declined to comment in response to a question from Raw Story about whether his client is angling for a pardon from Trump or seeking to leverage information about alleged election fraud to get his sentence reduced. Alcalá Cordones’ lawyer could not be reached for comment.

Election conspiracists claim Markwayne Mullin got them meeting with 2024 Trump campaign

Markwayne Mullin, the new head of Homeland Security, arranged for a group promoting a debunked claim about election software linked to Venezuela being used to manipulate U.S. votes to meet with the Trump campaign three weeks before the 2024 election, Raw Story has learned.

Martin Rodil, a Washington, D.C. area consultant, briefed Susie Wiles — then co-campaign manager and now chief of staff to President Donald Trump — at Mar-a-Lago in October 2024. Patrick Byrne, the former Overstock.com CEO, has said Mullin, then a U.S. senator, arranged that meeting.

Claims about election software supposedly controlled by Venezuelan leadership occupied a prominent place in failed lawsuits brought by lawyer Sidney Powell seeking to overturn the 2020 presidential election won by Joe Biden. Now, in the wake of the U.S. military strike against Venezuela and Republicans facing political headwinds in the upcoming midterm elections, Trump allies with the ear of the administration have begun to revive the claims.

Byrne hailed the appointment of Mullin to lead DHS “as a fantastic decision by President Trump” in an X post earlier this month. He went on to say that Mullin “got my partner into” Mar-a-Lago in October 2024, and that his associate “spent three days briefing the team there on elections, Venezuela, and what had to be done November 5.”

Byrne confirmed to Raw Story that his “partner” was Rodil.

Byrne was out of the country at the time, and did not attend the meeting, but he described himself as part of a “three-man team,” along with Rodil and Gary Berntsen, a retired CIA senior operations officer, that assembled a package of information to present to the Trump campaign and Elon Musk. Berntsen, in turn, described Rodil in an interview with far-right podcaster Lara Logan as his “business partner,” adding that Byrne “bankrolled” a group of “Venezuelan whistleblowers” that he and Rodil assembled.

An email to the White House Press Office seeking comment from Wiles for this story went unreturned.

During his interview with Logan, which was published in November 2025 before the U.S. military attacked Venezuela and seized its president, Nicolás Maduro, Berntsen claimed that the electronic election systems company Smartmatic, through the sale of a subsidiary to rival Dominion Voting Systems, gained “control” of more than 20 percent of the U.S. market, “primarily the swing states for electing president of the United States.” He went on to claim that Smartmatic has “two missions: number one, steal elections, and, number two, defeat audit.”

The group claimed Smartmatic had originally been created in Venezuela to fix elections, and was controlled by Maduro and his predecessor, Hugo Chávez.

In a separate interview with Logan in January, Rodil claimed that Cuba, China, Russia and Iran have been manipulating U.S. elections through Venezuela-controlled election software.

"And they install their own software — the Venezuelan narco-software in that company," Rodil said. "So, for many years in the U.S., the American people have been voting on a software built on a cartel of drugs."

A judge in Delaware ruled in September 2024 that those claims are false, writing that “statements regarding Smartmatic software or voting machines altering the results” of the 2020 election “are factually false” in a defamation lawsuit brought by the election technology company against the far-right network Newsmax.

It is unclear whether Berntsen was present for the meeting with Wiles and Rodil, but in his interview with Logan, he described a presentation that matches the Mar-a-Lago meeting.

“A month before the election, we showed it to the Trump people,” he said. “We went to them and gave them the brief. They looked at it in horror. And they had real concerns.”

Berntsen and Byrne have said Trump himself is aware of their claims, and their assertion is backed up by a TruthSocial post in which the president amplified Logan’s interview with Berntsen.

“We must focus all our energy and might on ELECTION FRAUD!!” Trump wrote, while sharing a link to the video of Berntsen’s interview.

Mullin opened to the doors at Mar-a-Lago to election deniers

Both Byrne and Berntsen said Mullin helped open doors for them at Mar-a-Lago.

Byrne told Raw Story that prior to the Mar-a-Lago meeting, the team approached members of the House Freedom Caucus, including Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), before the 2024 election, but those members deemed the information to be “too radioactive.” In contrast, Byrne said, Mullin was willing to help.

“That guy saved America because he was the one that got my partners into Mar-a-Lago,” Byrne said.

Berntsen similarly praised Mullin as “one politician in America” who “was not afraid.”

Mullin could not be reached for comment for this story, and an email to the Department of Homeland Security went unreturned.

But in an interview with far-right podcaster Benny Johnson in December, Mullin signaled that he was open to considering unfounded claims that Venezuela could perpetrate fraud in American elections.

“Venezuela has been a hub for this,” Mullin told Johnson. “There’s a relationship between China and Russia that’s also involved in this. And we know they have been trying to get involved in our elections…. We also allowed those investors to be part of some of the stuff we thought was unpenetrable, which had been some of our election cycles and our election machines and the way we look at to it.” [sic]

Mullin has a history of election denial. As a House representative, Mullin voted against certifying Joe Biden as the winner of the 2020 election. When asked during his Senate confirmation hearing earlier this month who won the election, Mullin would only say, “We know that President Joe Biden was sworn into office.”

Concerns that Trump could deploy ICE to polling places

As secretary of Homeland Security, Mullin now oversees the Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency, which, among other roles, is responsible for working with state and local governments and the private sector “to manage risks to the nation’s election infrastructure.”

Homeland Security also includes Immigration & Customs Enforcement and Border Patrol, two agencies that have undergone a transformation into paramilitary forces that have racially profiled immigrants while violently arresting and even killing immigrants and civilian bystanders during campaign in Democratic-governed cities that many residents have viewed as an “occupation.” During his confirmation hearing, Mullin said he would consider deploying federal officers to polling locations “if there was specific threat.”

Steve Bannon, former White House strategist and a close ally of the president, said on his podcast last week that the recent deployment of ICE agents to U.S. airports could serve as “a test run, a test case to really perfect ICE’s involvement in the 2026 midterm elections.”

Meanwhile, Trump said during an appearance on the podcast of former FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino last month that Republicans should “take over the voting” in at least 15 states and “nationalize” elections. Preceding his call to action, the president complained that “these people were brought to our country, and they vote illegally.” (There is no evidence of widespread systemic voter fraud by immigrants or anyone else.)

Election deniers have long embraced theories about foreign interference in U.S. elections as a trigger for justifying the president to issue emergency orders on national security grounds.

The 2024 meeting at Mar-a-Lago is not the first time Byrne has been involved in a group effort to bring extraordinary claims about election fraud to Trump’s inner circle — and call on the president to seize control of elections.

In December 2020, Byrne, Powell and retired Lt. General Michael Flynn showed up at the Oval Office and claimed that Venezuela had meddled in the 2020 election, while recommending that Trump seize voting machinery in key counties or deploy the National Guard to re-run the election.

Trump did not take the advice to seize voting machinery and re-run the election at that time. Instead, a couple hours later, the president sent out a tweet summoning his supporters to Washington, D.C. on Jan. 6, adding, "Be there, will be wild!"

Last week, speaking as a guest host of “InfoWars” — the show hosted by conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, who has been ordered to pay a $1.4 billion defamation judgment to the families of the Sandy Hook shooting victims — Byrne again urged Trump to interfere in an election that will determine the balance of power in the country.

“He’s got to do it — he can’t do it through the legislature and the [Department of Justice],” Byrne said. “He’s got to use his war powers, national security powers, Department of War, or use the National Guard and run a simple, old-fashioned election like we teach Burma how to do it. At the end of the day, he can do everything — and he needs to — as a national emergency.”

Revealed: Steve Bannon used Epstein as middleman as he sought to meet survivors group

Jeffrey Epstein, the financier and convicted sex trafficker, attempted to arrange a meeting between Steve Bannon, the right-wing strategist who helped bring Donald Trump to power, and leaders of the MeToo-inspired group Time’s Up, Raw Story has learned.

Phone texts exchanged between Epstein and Bannon in March 2018 show Epstein telling Bannon that an intermediary, Joichi “Joi” Ito — then the director of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Media Lab — had agreed to set up the meeting.

“Joi will organize a meeting with the powers behind Time’s up,” Epstein told Bannon on March 26, 2018, according to the text, which was included in the massive trove of files released by the U.S. Justice Department in response to the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

Text from Jeffrey Epstein to Steve Bannon discussing plans for a meeting between Bannon and the leadership of Time's Up.U.S. Department of Justice

Time’s Up launched in January 2018 by 300 prominent women in the entertainment industry to raise awareness about sexual misconduct and push for gender parity in Hollywood, in the wake of revelations about movie mogul Harvey Weinstein’s pattern of rape and harassment.

Bannon, who had served as chairman of Trump’s 2016 campaign and as White House strategist, represented an opposing current in the shifting cultural tides of the first Trump administration.

Before joining the Trump campaign, Bannon had led Breitbart News. Under Bannon’s watch, the outlet promoted Gamergate, a digital mob that harassed women in the video-game industry while giving expression to a right-wing backlash against feminism and racial diversity that would become a potent political force. Known as the “alt-right” at the time, the movement helped propel Trump to power.

The effort to broker a meeting between Bannon and the Time’s Up leadership — two entities at seemingly opposing poles — has not been previously reported.

Epstein added in parentheses after the text to Bannon about the proposed meeting that “they prefer academic setting for cover,” suggesting that he had at least discussed the idea with someone at Time’s Up.

The texts do not identify Epstein’s contact at the organization. But two years earlier, Michelle Kydd, who would go on to become a founding member of Time’s Up, had recommended two public relations professionals to Epstein, as first reported by Page Six Hollywood.

At the time of Kydd’s 2016 email, Epstein had pleaded guilty to child prostitution and had served jail time.

Ito initially put Kydd, a member of his advisory council at MIT Media Lab, in touch with Epstein in 2014. Ito described Kydd, who is the chief innovation officer at Creative Artists Agency, to Epstein as “sort of the ‘mother’ of Hollywood,” who “famous people under the protection of CAA go to when they get in trouble.”

A request for comment left by Raw Story for Kydd at Creative Artists Agency went unreturned.

The texts exchanged between Epstein and Bannon in 2018 show that Bannon was interested in meeting with the Time’s Up leaders.

Three days after initially broaching the idea of a meeting, Epstein raised the topic again.

“We should probably figure out your first meeting with the Time’s Up powers,” Epstein texted. “Academic setting to give them cover. Probably MIT.”

“Yes,” Bannon replied.

“Joi agreed,” Epstein said.

“Wow,” Bannon responded.

Texts exchanged between Jeffrey Epstein and Steve Bannon discussing plans for a meeting with Time's Up.U.S. Department of Justice

It is unclear whether the meeting between Bannon and Time’s Up ever took place, but emails show that Epstein and Ito had planned to meet in Cambridge, Mass. on March 25 — the day before Epstein suggested the idea to Bannon — and that Epstein and Ito had attempted to schedule a phone call two days before that.

Bannon also spent the day with Epstein in Cambridge on March 25, although it’s unclear whether Bannon and Ito met directly.

“I have all day Sunday. Harvard MIT, [former Harvard President] Larry Summers etc.,” Epstein texted Bannon on March 23. “You are always welcome to join.”

“Pulling up,” Bannon wrote to Epstein on March 25 at 12:09 p.m.

The next day Bannon texted Epstein: “Thanks for yesterday — really terrific day.”

Ito could not be reached for comment.

Ito resigned from his position at MIT following Epstein’s 2019 arrest. He later received appointment as president of the Chiba Institute of Technology in Japan.

Following the latest round of revelations about Ito’s association with Epstein following the recent release of files by the U.S. Justice Department, Ito announced he was stepping away from a Japanese government technology initiative known as the Global Startup Campus Initiative.

A statement from the Chiba Institute of Technology said Ito “reaffirmed he was never aware of the existence of any illegal or improper conduct” with regard to Epstein, “and has never been involved in any illegal or improper conduct.”

Raw Story was not able to reach Bannon for comment. But the right-wing nationalist avatar’s interest in Time’s Up has been well-publicized.

At the time of the proposed meeting, Bannon had become estranged from Trump, having been fired from his position as White House strategist six months earlier. Shortly after leaving the Trump administration, Bannon backed Republican Roy Moore in the special election to fill a vacant U.S. Senate seat in Alabama in the fall of 2017, even after accusations by several women that Moore had sexually assaulted them when they were girls caused his candidacy to implode.

In 2018 and 2019, Bannon embarked on a global campaign to promote a right-wing populist movement and far-right nationalist candidates, including Marine LePen in France, Mario Salvini in Italy and Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil.

In February 2018, Bannon publicly expressed admiration for Time’s Up, telling GQ that he had “never seen such potential power in something,” adding that he considered Time’s Up “a reaction to this populist movement, this nationalist movement.”

During an event in Zurich, Switzerland about a week later, Bannon reportedly praised Time’s Up as representing “an empowered grassroots on the left” that “focused on power dynamics in society and asks deep and searching questions that are going to have to be answered.”

Bannon contrasted Time’s Up with the nationalist movement that he had helped build in the United States and abroad, while predicting “these two forces are going to collide, and we’re going to see who wins and who loses.”

While Bannon characterized Time’s Up as “anti-patriarchy,” he had previously recognized the latent power of teenage gamers, whom he typified as “rootless white males” to biographer Joshua Green. Bannon described his appreciation for Milo Yiannopoulos, an editor who was forced to resign from Breitbart in 2017 following the revelation of comments that appeared to condone pedophilia.

“I realized Milo could connect with these [gamers] right away,” Bannon told Green. “You can activate that army. They come in through Gamergate or whatever and then get turned onto politics and Trump.”

Texts exchanged between Epstein and Bannon during the Senate Judiciary hearings to confirm Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh in September 2018 reveal that while the two men may have publicly praised Time’s Up, their private views were far less favorable.

“Your Times Up movement strength,” Epstein texted to Bannon. “Prophetic in Kavanaugh.”

“Scary,” Bannon responded.

“Every guy can visualize himself sitting in that chair, being harangued by [Sen. Kamala] Harris, [Sen. Dianne] Feinstein] etc.,” Epstein continued. “Did you grab, grope. How many drinks. How often. Can you categorically deny it didn’t happen. Yikes.”

“The victim must be heard and must believed,” Bannon said.

A couple days later, Epstein told Bannon he believed Time’s Up was behind the scrutiny of Kavanaugh for alleged sexual misconduct, adding that “they want a woman on the court.”

Whatever benefit Bannon and Epstein may have seen in forging a relationship with Time’s Up, a scandal involving leaders of the organization maneuvering behind the scenes to protect one powerful man led to its eventual downfall.

Following revelations that Time’s Up CEO Tina Tchen discouraged public comments about sexual harassment allegations against former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, a Democrat, and that Tchen and board chair Roberta Kaplan offered advice to Cuomo, the organization ceased operations in 2023.

Ex-Marine Nazi leader who once urged execution of judges arrested by FBI

A neo-Nazi who embraces terrorism has been ordered held in pre-trial detention as a danger to the community by a federal magistrate judge following his arrest for illegally possessing a firearm.

Mathew David Bair, a leader of the neo-Nazi accelerationist group Injekt Division, was arrested in Pennsylvania by the FBI last week.

A former Marine who was court-martialed out of the service for larceny and sale of classified materials, Bair joined the riot at the U.S. Capitol as a member of First Capitol Proud Boys, as Trump supporters attempted to overturn the 2020 election on Jan. 6.

From his time as a Proud Boy, Bair increasingly gravitated to a violent brand of white supremacist extremism. He told Raw Story in 2024 that “the fascist pipeline is very real,” and that he had been “in a direct pipeline chapter.”

Bair’s radicalization led him to Injekt Division, a neo-Nazi accelerationist group whose former leader was arrested in May 2021 for allegedly plotting to carry out a mass shooting at a Texas Walmart.

“I would say they’re very much in line with the Terrorgram milieu,” Hannah Gais, a senior researcher and journalist at the Southern Poverty Law Center, told Raw Story. “I think obviously given their origin, they have clear ties to violence.”

Terrorgram Collective is a global network that has encouraged mass shootings, political assassinations and infrastructure attacks through online propaganda, which inspired a deadly school shooting spree in Brazil, a fatal mass shooting at an LGBTQ+ bar in Slovakia and a mass stabbing in Turkey, as well as assassination attempts and thwarted attacks on electrical substations. Dallas Humber, one of the group’s leaders, is currently serving a 30-year prison sentence after pleading guilty to soliciting hate crimes and murder.

In 2023, Bair posted a video depicting a flyer reading, “Shoot your local judge.” Asked about the flyer by Raw Story, Bair brought up an incident in which an extremist went to the home of U.S. District Court Judge Esther Salas and fatally shot her son. Salas has frequently spoken out against threats directed at judges who cross President Trump over the past year.

Extremist researchers and antifascist activists have closely monitored Bair due, in part, to his provocative online presence. They include a Telegram message showing members posing in tactical gear and skull masks outside what appears to be a power plant while displaying firearms and their group flag.

Another Telegram message linked to Bair shows a ballistic vest, flags and pistols draped over a car seat accompanied by text indicating the author was traveling to Washington, DC on Jan. 24, 2025, a date that coincides with the March for Life. The annual event typically draws both far-right extremists and left-wing counterprotesters. Carrying firearms is prohibited in Washington, D.C., with a few exceptions that include law enforcement.

An indictment returned on March 4 alleges that Bair possessed an Aero Precision rifle and Ruger pistol while knowing that he had been convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment for more than a year. Bair pleaded not guilty following his arrest on March 11.

A magistrate judge in Harrisburg, Pa. ordered Bair to be held in pre-trial detention, partly on the basis that his release poses serious danger to a person or the community. The magistrate also cited Bair’s prior criminal history, prior parole violations, prior failures to appear in court, and the strength of evidence supporting the gun charge.

Dawn Clark, a public affairs officer with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, declined to comment in response to questions about why the government argued that Bair is a danger to a person or the community, or whether the government is concerned that Bair has attempted to intimidate judges.

Beatrice Diehl, an assistant federal public defender assigned to represent Bair, also declined to comment.

An undated photo of Mathew Bair from an Injekt Division Telegram chatVia Telegram

While becoming increasingly immersed in violent neo-Nazi activity, Bair remained committed to Trump. In July 2024, shortly after Trump accepted the nomination at the Republican National Convention, an Injekt Division Telegram channel linked to Bair posted video of a rally in Michigan in which neo-Nazis chanted, “We love Hitler, we love Trump.”

In late 2023, Bair joined 2119, a teenage neo-Nazi gang, after four of its members, ages 15 to 18, were arrested in Pensacola, Fla. for a hate-fueled vandalism spree that included brick attacks on two synagogues. 2-1-19 is an alphanumeric code that stands for Blood and Soil, with 2 representing B for “Blood,” 1 representing A for “And” and 19 representing “S.” for “Soil.” Blood and Soil is the English translation for Blut und Boden, a popular phrase during the Third Reich that suggests a mystical bond between a racialized ideal and the land of Germany.

The group previously went by the moniker Revolutionary White Brotherhood, or RWB.

Then 34, Bair was by far the oldest member of 2119, which was the focus of a February 2024 investigation by Raw Story. Bair posted a photo on the social media platform Telegram that showed his 4-year-old son posing next to 2119 graffiti.

In March 2024, the [2119] Sons of Pennsylvania Telegram channel, likely operated by Bair, posted a video of two men driving a pickup truck to the Pennsylvania State Police barracks in York, and depositing a brick inscribed with the letters R-W-B at the front door, declaring as they departed: “White f------ power.”

2119 went into decline following the Raw Story investigation. By mid-2014, the group had disbanded as its leader lowered his profile and members found themselves caught in the middle of intra-movement rivalries between larger white nationalist organizations. Injekt Division likely contributed to 2119’s demise by doxxing a leader of 2119’s California chapter after he admitted to “snitch[ing] on” another member.

Bair is not the only associate of 2119 who has faced arrest in recent months.

Aiden Cuevas, an Alabama neo-Nazi who enthusiastically promoted 2119, was indicted alongside Andrew Nary for conspiracy to traffic firearms after allegedly buying machine guns from an undercover FBI employee while planning to start a paramilitary and requesting training to “take out” so-called “high-value targets.

Cuevas and Nary both entered not guilty pleas before a federal magistrate judge in Huntsville, Ala. last week.

Last month, David William Fair, a probationary member of the racist skinhead group Vinlanders Social Club, was indicted in North Carolina for felony soliciting gang activity and contributing the delinquency of a minor.

Fair had administered a Telegram chat that Bair joined in 2023. That same year, following the Pensacola arrests, Fair counseled Cuevas in another Telegram chat that 2119 should exercise more discretion to avoid criminal prosecution.

The story previously stated that Bair and a second man deposited a brick outside the York Police Department. The story has been corrected to reflect that they deposited the brick outside a Pennsylvania State Police barracks in York.

A Black man was sentenced to death for killing a white woman. His lawyer was in the Klan

Lawyers for a Black man serving life in prison in Alabama are seeking to overturn his conviction for the murder of a white woman, citing evidence his state-provided attorney was active in the Ku Klux Klan.

“Was he well positioned to represent a Black man?” one investigator asked.

“I think the answer is no.”

‘Enough questions’

Robin “Rocky” Myers, who has an intellectual disability, was convicted of stabbing to death Ludie Mae Tucker, 69, at her home in Decatur in 1991. Now 64, Myers has always claimed to be innocent.

Sentenced to death in 1994, Myers spent more than 30 years on death row. He was due to be executed using nitrogen gas before, last March, Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey commuted the sentence to life, observing that the case was “riddled with conflicting evidence from seemingly everyone involved.”

Robin Myers. Robin Myers.

Saying she “had enough questions about Mr. Myers’ guilt that I cannot move forward with executing him,” the Republican governor also noted that the jury in Myers’ case recommended a life sentence only to be overridden by the judge, a step allowed under Alabama law until 2017.

Incredibly, it was known in 1994 that John E. Mays, the lawyer who represented Myers during his trial in Decatur, was a lawyer for United Klans of America.

Mays’ public work for the Klan included representing Imperial Wizard Robert Shelton in a civil lawsuit brought by the mother of Michael Donald, a Black teenager who was strangled and stabbed to death by three UKA members in Mobile, his body hung from a tree.

But what was not known about Mays until now — having been unearthed thanks to newspaper archive research by the legal team seeking to overturn Myers’ conviction — is that the lawyer was actively involved in the United Klans of America, giving speeches at rallies in six states and counseling parents on how to resist public school desegregation.

Mays even received credit as a contributor to the Klan newspaper, The Fiery Cross.

‘Exhorted Caucasians to band together’

According to a new filing, last July, Mays told investigators for Myers’ legal team Shelton asked him to write an article “about the risks of the Klan being infiltrated by the FBI.”

But the filing by Myers' legal team also cites contemporaneous reporting alleging that Mays traveled with Shelton to Lakeland, Fla. in 1977, “to teach parents who opposed desegregation how to file habeas suits on behalf of their children.”

According to a Virginia newspaper, meanwhile, Mays stood alongside Shelton at a 1977 Klan rally in Richmond, Va, and said: “You hear a lot about civil rights of n-----s and civil rights of murderers and every kind of pervert known to humanity.

“But what about the civil rights of the decent law-abiding white man or the law-abiding Black man, for that matter.”

Following Donald’s murder in Mobile, a Tennessee newspaper reported that at a 1981 Klan rally, Mays “exhorted Caucasians to band together in the face of an oncoming race war.”

Mays could not be reached for comment. But investigators for Myers’ legal team said that when they met Mays last year, he denied ever being a member of the Klan.

Leah Nelson, one of the investigators, told Raw Story she was confident that Mays “aligned with Klan goals” when he represented Myers.

“I believe the contemporaneous newspaper accounts over what he says now,” she said. “I think you really have to look at his actions, and ask: ‘Was he well positioned to represent a Black man?’

“I think the answer is, no.”

‘Unwaivable conflict of interest’

Myers’ motion requesting that the court vacate his conviction argues that no forensic evidence tied him to the crime. At least one witness for the state has recanted, saying he falsely implicated Myers in exchange for a police detective not charging him with auto theft.

The motion also argues that Myers’ conviction should be overturned on the basis of his lawyer’s failure to provide effective assistance.

Mays, the motion argues, “acted under an unwaivable conflict of interest: his racism, which ran so deep that there is no plausible way it did not impact his representation of Mr. Myers, a poor Black man.”

During his opening statement in 1994, Mays described the place where Myers lived as “the very pit of hell” while characterizing his client as a “transiate” [sic] despite the fact that he lived with his wife and family.

In a response filed late on Thursday, Assistant District Attorney Courtney Schellack asked the court to dismiss Myers' petition, arguing that it is "wholly without merit" and denying "any material allegation" in the filing.

Myers' legal team will have the opportunity to file a reply before a judge decides whether to grant the motion to vacate his sentence.

Schellack's response waved aside revelations about Mays' involvement with the Klan.

The only new information in the affidavit filed to support Myers' claim "is that Mr. Mays said he wrote an article at some point for the Klan publication," Schellack said, adding: "Mr. Mays specifically denied being a member of the Klan or attending Klan rallies."

The archived newspaper articles cannot be considered "newly discovered" information, Schellack said.

‘A certificate or trophy’

Nelson told Raw Story the extent to which other members of the legal community in Morgan County were aware of Mays’ involvement in the Klan in the 1970s and 1980s remains unclear.

Noting that Mays’ speaking engagements took place at rallies outside Alabama, Nelson said he may have taken care to reduce his visibility in his own community.

But one clue suggests Mays’ colleagues in the legal profession may have known more than they let on.

Based on a tip, J. Mitchell McGuire, Myers’ lawyer, filed an emergency motion last month expressing the belief that a “material artifact such as a certificate or trophy commending attorney Mays for his service to the Ku Klux Klan” is stashed in the evidence room or basement of the Morgan County Courthouse.

McGuire signaled that he intends to request discovery of May’s alleged Klan activity, and expressed concern that potential evidence could be misplaced or destroyed during renovations at the courthouse, which began in mid-February.

Judge Charles B. Elliot denied the motion — without explanation.

GOP NY gov pick runs from link to J6ers and Trump ‘secretary of retribution’

The Republican candidate for governor of New York was scheduled to speak at an event headlined by far-right extremists and rioters convicted over the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol, according to a Raw Story investigation.

Bruce Blakeman, the Nassau County executive running against incumbent Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul, was featured on promotional materials for a January event associated with retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser.

The Stay Awake America event took place at the Trump-themed America First Warehouse in Ronkonkoma on Long Island from Jan. 10-11, though ultimately Blakeman did not attend, said Teresa Helfrich, director of operations for the America First Warehouse.

“He didn't end up showing up,” Helfrich said.

“Apparently, he was really busy, but unfortunately, he did not come, and people were a bit disappointed, but we tried our best.”

Helfrich said she was under the impression Blakeman was unable to attend because he was preparing for his inauguration the following day, for his second term as county executive.

In a statement to Raw Story, Blakeman attempted to distance himself from the event.

“Kathy Hochul told 5.4 million Republicans to leave New York,” Blakeman said through a campaign spokesperson, referring to 2022 remarks in which the governor named GOP figures including Trump, rather than every Republican in the state.

“Now she’s inventing distractions about events I never attended and people I’ve never spoken to because she can’t defend her tax hikes and soaring utility bills. She’s so bothered by her record she’s becoming delusional. I’m trying to make New York affordable.”

A poster for the event circulated by the America First Warehouse and Stay Awake America organizer prominently featured Blakeman as a speaker.

Flynn shared an X post promoting the event, which referenced Blakeman.

Also featured were Stewart Rhodes, the Oath Keepers militia leader whose 18-year sentence for sedition was commuted by President Trump; Treniss Jewell Evans III, who pleaded guilty to entering the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021; and Ivan Raiklin, a Flynn associate who campaigns to punish Trump’s enemies.

The event was advertised as a tribute to Tina Peters, a Colorado county clerk sentenced to nine years in prison for her role in the effort to overturn the 2020 election. Trump is pressuring Democratic Colorado Gov. Jared Polis to grant Peters clemency.

Blakeman did recently speak at the Queens Village Republican Club’s Lincoln Dinner, on March 1. That event honored John Eastman, a now-disbarred attorney who advised Trump and played a central role in the effort to overturn the 2020 election, Politico reported.

Lara Logan, a journalist who has spread far-right conspiracy theories, accepted an award and spoke at that event.

In a statement, Blakeman denied knowing “who John Eastman is or what he stands for.”

Jacob Neiheisel, an associate professor of political science at the University of Buffalo, told Raw Story “association means a lot in politics,” and candidates make calculations about the costs and benefits of being linked with individuals or groups.

“You can distance yourself quite a bit. Trump's been effective at it,” Neiheisel said.

“It works for Trump. It can work for other people.”

Amy Young, director and organizer of Stay Awake America, did not respond to requests for comment.

‘Threat of Islam’

Blakeman’s biography appears on the Stay Awake America website’s “past and present speaker list.”

The January event at which he was advertised to speak promised more than 17 “nationally known expert speakers in health, civics, faith, education, threat of Islam in America and child sex trafficking.”

Being associated with far-right figures doesn’t help Blakeman’s chances of winning in the blue state, Neiheisel said, adding that Republican gubernatorial candidates in New York “have to at least outwardly appear centrist to the bulk of voters, but that's not where the energy in the party is. The energy is typically on the far right.”

But such associations do “make you viable for other positions elsewhere, and put you on the radar of other people in the party, particularly if MAGA is able to continue beyond Trump,” Neiheisel said.

“I think that this also might be a play [by Blakeman] to stay relevant and stay in some of those circles even after he loses.”

Trump endorsed Blakeman in December after Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY), dropped out of the Republican primary.

Larry Levy, a former political journalist and associate vice president and executive dean of the National Center for Suburban Studies at Hofstra University, said “at some point, Blakeman will have to pivot to the middle — there just aren’t enough Republican voters in the state for him to win without a goodly number of moderate independents and soft Democrats — and Gen. Flynn certainly wouldn’t help him build bridges to them."

Flynn was briefly national security adviser to Trump in his first term before being fired for lying about contacts with Russian officials.

The Stay Awake America Tour is inspired and endorsed by Flynn and grew out of an earlier roadshow, the ReAwaken America Tour, that prominently featured his work as a far-right campaigner and promoted conspiracy theories and Christian nationalism.

On a recent podcast, Young said the tour came about as a result of a conversation between Flynn and Caspar McCloud, an English musician who performs at the events, about the need to mobilize support for Trump.

‘Secretary of Retribution’

Rhodes, whose name was originally listed at the bottom of the January event poster but whose photo is the first featured for a Stay Awake America event on March 20, founded the Oath Keepers, an anti-government group that recruited military veterans and retired law enforcement during the Obama administration.

The Oath Keepers, alongside the Proud Boys, provided the engine for the attack on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6.

Rhodes was freed from prison after Trump’s second inauguration but did not receive a pardon.

Raiklin, then an Army Reserve lieutenant colonel, promoted the so-called “Pence Card” argument, holding that Vice President Mike Pence possessed the authority to set aside the results of the 2020 election.

The expectation that Pence would comply inflamed Trump’s supporters and helped fuel the riot at the Capitol on Jan. 6, when the former vice president refused to bend to pressure.

As Trump mounted his 2024 election bid, Raiklin launched a campaign as self-appointed “secretary of retribution,” featuring veiled threats of violence against perceived enemies.

Ivan Raiklin Retired Lt. Col. Ivan Raiklin and self-styled "secretary of retribution" Ivan Raiklin at the Republican National Convention (Jordan Green/Raw Story)

Evans pleaded guilty to entering the Capitol and drinking Fireball whisky in a congressional conference room.

During the 2024 campaign, he joined Raiklin for a press conference, calling for “live-streamed swatting raids” against Trump’s enemies.

Raiklin met with law enforcement officials in Texas to detail his plans for recruiting sheriffs to arrest Trump’s enemies, Raw Story reported.

As Nassau county executive, Blakeman has hired armed citizens as special deputy sheriffs — what critics have called an unlawful personal militia, the New York Times reported.

In January, Rhodes and Raiklin held a press conference at the White House calling on Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act to stop Democrats winning the 2026 midterm elections and retaking Congress.

Raiklin has worked closely with Flynn, serving on the board of America’s Future, an organization led by Flynn and his sister. Raiklin took part in a 2024 tour to promote a documentary about Flynn.

Trump supporters storm the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Kent Nishimura/Los Angeles Times/TNS

Helfrich told Raw Story the America First Warehouse supports those who participated in the riot at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, and she said she believes “the real insurrection happened on November 3 of 2020 when the deep state and the powers that be tried to overthrow a US presidential election.”

“We are 100 percent behind our fellow Patriot brothers and sisters who took a First Amendment stand that day to let Congress know that they didn't want a stolen election to be certified,” she said.

“We are extremely supportive advocates of the J6 community, and we do not see them as felons. We see them as politically persecuted patriots.”

Conspiracy theories

Stay Awake America’s “sizzle reel” to promote upcoming events features Cathy O’Brien, a conspiracy theorist who claims to be the victim of government mind control, and Judy Mikovits, a controversial virologist who equates vaccination with "extermination and sterilization.”

Mikovits was billed on the event where Blakeman was scheduled to appear.

Flynn appeared in the promotional video encouraging people to participate in the Stay Awake America movement.

Helfrich told Raw Story, “We love the people at the Stay Awake American tour,” and the warehouse has “the same mission.”

“The reason why we love their work is because we do believe that there's a lot that America is facing right now,” Helfrich said.

“Obviously, all of us are big President Trump supporters, and we love what he's doing, but he's only in office for another three years, and we do believe, a lot of us, that the country needs to stay awake and keep fighting beyond this term.”

Young’s X posts promoting the Stay Awake America tour frequently include the phrase “blitz 2026 midterms.”

Young frequently reshares posts from X accounts that promote the QAnon conspiracy theory, including one that in January revived the Pizzagate conspiracy theory, which falsely claimed that Democrats ran a child sex trafficking operation in the basement of a DC pizzeria.

Young shares QAnon beliefs with staff at the America First Warehouse, the Trump-themed event space in Ronkonkoma.

Speaking in January on the podcast she co-hosts at the America First Warehouse, Helfrich said she decided to go to Washington, D.C. on Jan. 6 after a friend admonished her: “Where we go one, we go all.” Helfrich said she and her co-host, “Angie the Patriette,” have that QAnon slogan “tattooed on our bodies.”

Young has also re-shared posts on X that promote election denialism, celebrate Russian President Vladimir Putin, and push Islamophobia and antisemitism.

One post from QAnon promoter Liz Crokin that Young re-shared less than a week before the Ronkonkoma event insinuates that illegal tunnels discovered underneath the Chabad-Lubavitch world headquarters in Brooklyn link Jews to child exploitation.

The tunnels were reportedly built by a radical offshoot of the Hasidic Jewish movement seeking to expand the site. There is no evidence of human trafficking at the site.

Judge in Texas ICE ‘antifa’ protest case cites deadly Waco siege in big win for Trump DOJ

The federal judge presiding over the trial of nine “antifa” defendants charged with terrorism and attempted murder in relation to a protest at an ICE detention facility in Texas last summer on Tuesday granted a request by the Department of Justice to bar self-defense claims in response to the shooting of a local police officer.

The order by Judge Mark Pittman during a hearing in Fort Worth, Texas — made in light of a ruling arising from the deadly Waco siege of 1993 — forbids defendants from presenting further evidence and argument to claim that one acted in self-defense or in defense of others when he allegedly shot Alvarado Police Lt. Thomas Gross.

The government’s motion asserted that such claims were “legally invalid.”

‘Apparently unarmed’

The new order, only the most recent in a tumultuous series of developments in the Trump administration’s first “antifa” prosecution, came after one defendant alleged that Gross pointed a pistol at a fleeing protester before he was shot.

Pittman’s written order was not immediately available, but his decision from the bench was reported by the defendants’ support committee, which is closely monitoring the trial.

Patrick McLain, an attorney for defendant Zachary Evetts, wrote in a filing on Monday that testimony by Gross and other government witnesses indicates “evidence of self-defense and defense of another.

“Lt. Gross noticed someone running away from him, dressed in black and apparently unarmed,” McLain wrote.

Some testimony has raised questions about whether the protester was armed.

McLain continued: “In that instant, Lt. Gross thought the person running away from him may have had something to do with the words spray-painted on an unoccupied guard shack he had also seen at that moment. Lt. Gross testified he pointed his pistol, loaded with a round in the chamber, at the back of the fleeing person.”

But on Tuesday, setting aside McLain’s argument that Gross’s actions were not a reasonable use of force, Pittman sided with the government’s position that the defendants are precluded from asserting that Song acted in defense of another because they cannot claim they were without fault in the events that led to the shooting.

In remarks from the bench, Pittman echoed the government’s citation of a legal precedent set in the prosecution of members of the Branch Davidian sect during the deadly 1993 siege by the FBI at Waco, Texas, according to the support committee.

The government motion cited a 1996 decision by a panel of judges in the Fifth Circuit finding that a Branch Davidian sect member could not claim self-defense when officers of the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) came to the group’s compound to serve arrest warrants for stockpiling weapons.

“A member of a conspiracy to murder federal agents, who dresses for combat, retrieves an assault rifle, and proceeds to the front door to confront government agents executing a lawful warrant, is not entitled to claim the benefit of self-defense when the hoped-for confrontation with the agents occurs,” the judges wrote.

Xavier de Janon, the director of mass defense at the National Lawyers Guild, said the new order could weaken the rights of people attempting to protect themselves against law enforcement aggression.

“I am concerned that the ability to defend oneself against law enforcement when they draw their weapon at you has been placed in danger,” de Janon told Raw Story.

“And some people would say you should not have the ability to self-defend against law enforcement. But there is case law that says people have the right to resist unlawful arrest and unlawful law enforcement conduct.”

De Janon represents Elizabeth Soto, one of the federal defendants, in a separate state prosecution.

The FBI siege at Waco is widely considered to have been a galvanizing event for the U.S far-right, feeding a narrative of government overreach that would inspire conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, the Oath Keepers and the Three Percenters, all of whom were involved in the 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

President Donald Trump, on whose behalf the Capitol attack was staged, held his first rally of the 2024 presidential campaign in Waco.

Now, with Trump making “antifa” the focal point of his effort to criminalize political opposition through a national security memorandum that broadly condemns views counter to his agenda, DOJ prosecutors are arguing that Song’s actions are analogous to those of the Branch Davidians.

Four ATF agents were among the 86 people killed at Waco. Most sect members died in a massive fire after federal agents attacked.

Outside the Texas ICE facility last July 4, Lt. Gross was reportedly shot in the neck, with the bullet exiting through his back. He was treated at a local hospital and released after four hours.

‘Get to the rifles’

In its motion, the DOJ cited testimony by two corrections officers “that after the defendants were told to leave and that the police had been called, Song remained in place armed with an AR-15 near the roadway from which any law enforcement response would arrive.”

Citing evidence from police body-worn camera footage that Song shouted “get to the rifles” and almost immediately opened fire on Gross, the government argued he could not claim self-defense, while directly quoting the Fifth Circuit ruling on the Branch Davidians.

De Janon said Judge Pittman’s order shouldn’t affect the other defendants. With or without self-defense, there are numerous ways to challenge the government’s accusation, he said.

And while the order hurts Song’s defense, the government still has a burden to overcome to prove its case.

“This is an attempted murder charge,” de Janon said. “They will have to prove malice aforethought. They will have to prove premeditation. Not all is lost. They will have to prove every single element of attempted murder. It’s everything — identity of the shooter, that an intent was formed not just to hurt, but to kill.

“The sequence of events could still weaken the state’s theory given the fact it was Gross who drew his firearm first.”

The government argued that allowing defendants to claim self-defense “can only serve as a thinly veiled attempt to encourage the jury to nullify any verdict in this case.”

The judge’s order to bar evidence of self-defense comes only a week after he declared a mistrial after interrupting a defense attorney questioning prospective jurors about whether they believed it was appropriate to bring guns to a protest.

Prospective jurors had spoken against ICE operations and expressed broad disapproval of the Trump administration.

Trump DOJ’s big ‘antifa’ ICE case runs into trouble over shootout evidence

Defendants on trial in Texas in the Trump administration’s first “antifa” prosecution are claiming self-defense, in answer to attempted murder and terrorism charges stemming from a chaotic confrontation outside an ICE detention facility that culminated with the shooting of a local police officer.

After defense lawyers cross-examined Alvarado police Lt. Thomas Gross, who suffered minor injuries after allegedly being shot by one of the nine defendants, the government last Friday filed a motion in court in Fort Worth, seeking to bar defendants from making a self-defense claim.

The government argues that because any claim of self-defense or defense of others was “legally unsupportable,” introducing evidence or arguments that raise that defense would amount to “a thinly veiled attempt to encourage the jury to nullify any verdict in this case.”

Benjamin Song, the alleged shooter, and four other defendants could face life imprisonment if convicted of attempted murder of law enforcement officers.

The issue of self-defense in the actions of the nine defendants accused of carrying out a “coordinated attack” on the Prairieland ICE facility arises amid a lingering national outcry over the January killing of Alex Pretti, a 37-year-old protester, by two Border Patrol agents in Minneapolis.

When he was shot, Pretti was carrying a handgun in accordance with Minnesota law. He did not draw the weapon before being shot multiple times.

Claims by administration members including President Donald Trump himself that Pretti should not have brought his gun to a protest met with bipartisan scorn, including among hardline gun rights groups.

While polling shows that ICE’s actions are widely unpopular, the government could face an additional hurdle with jurors in the Prairieland case, given that Texas is a state with broad support for gun rights.

“Our law is that you can open carry,” Greg Abbott, the state’s conservative Republican governor who is in the middle of a reelection campaign, declared at a January event following Pretti’s death.

“There are protests and other activities that occur all the time when people are carrying guns and doing so lawfully.”

Protest or attack?

Federal prosecutors and investigators have strenuously objected to the defendants’ description of events at the Prairieland Detention Center outside Fort Worth on July 4, 2025 as a “protest,” insisting it was an “attack.”

The defendants said they shot off fireworks to cheer up immigrants inside the facility. Prosecutors argue they fired “explosives” and vandalized government vehicles and a guard shack, in a ploy to draw law enforcement into an ambush.

The original indictment in the case came only three weeks after President Trump issued an executive order designating “antifa” as a domestic terrorist organization while describing the amorphous left-wing movement as “a militarist, anarchist enterprise that explicitly calls for the overthrow of the United States government.”

When the government unveiled the final indictment last November, Robert Cerna, acting director for the ICE Dallas Field Office, described the July 4 incident as a “coordinated attack” carried out “to sow anarchy and to undermine the rule of law.”

A response filed on Monday by the lawyer for one defendant charged with attempted murder directly challenges the government’s theory of the case.

Patrick McLain, who represents Zachary Evetts, wrote that testimony by government witnesses indicates “evidence of self-defense and defense of another.”

Citing Gross’ testimony, McLain wrote that the officer emerged from his squad car “with pistol raised in one hand” after receiving a report of a lone person attempting to enter the ICE facility.

“Lt. Gross noticed someone running away from him, dressed in black and apparently unarmed,” McLain wrote.

“In that instant, Lieutenant Gross thought the person running away from him may have had something to do with the words spray-painted on an unoccupied guard shack he had also seen at that moment. Lt. Gross testified that he pointed his pistol, loaded with a round in the chamber, at the back of the fleeing person.”

Video presented in court last week showed that within six seconds of Gross’s arrival on the scene, Song fired a rifle at Gross, and Gross fired back, McLain wrote.

The lawyer went on to say testimony from another officer that a bullet struck the magazine of Song’s rifle suggests Gross pointed his pistol at Song.

The government argued in its motion that “any assertion of self-defense or defense of others is legally unsupportable,” in part because defendants cannot legally show that Gross’s “display of force in pointing his weapon at a non-compliant defendant” was unreasonable.

McLain countered that Gross’s actions were “objectively unreasonable,” citing a 1985 Supreme Court decision, Tennessee v. Garner, which ruled “that deadly force is only allowed to apprehend felons who the police officer has probable cause to believe pose a ‘significant threat of death or serious physical injury’ to them or to the public.”

In Garner, McLain wrote, the high court ruled that the officer “violated the Fourth Amendment by shooting a fleeing burglary suspect, who did not appear to be armed, in the back of the head.

“Here, Lt. Gross was presented with a situation that, in the moment, he had no reason to believe involved a felony at all, let alone one in which a personal already running away from him was likely to present a ‘significant threat of death or serious physical injury,’” McLain wrote in his stinging retort.

“Even if someone ‘trying to get in’ to PDC could have warranted Lt. Gross’s response, the individual at whom he took aim was running in the opposite direction. Lt. Gross’s act of aiming his firearm at the back of an unarmed fleeing person, a misdemeanant at best and nonviolent felon at worst, was objectively unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment.”

An email to the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Texas seeking comment went unreturned.

‘Yet another questionable move’

The defendants’ supporters flagged the motion to bar a self-defense claim as a sign of desperation on the government’s part.

“This is yet another questionable move by federal prosecutors in this unprecedented case, with the potential of seriously eroding the defendants’ ability to have a fair trial and adequate defense,” said Xavier T. de Janon, a lawyer representing a federal defendant in a parallel state criminal case.

“The government seeks to take away crucial, fact-based issues out of the hands of the jury, in the middle of the trial, after the evidence has already been introduced.”

‘Never sensed danger’: Friends ponder Mar-a-Lago gunman’s motive — and anger over Epstein

The young man who drove from North Carolina to south Florida and breached the perimeter of Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort while armed with a shotgun and gas can, and was killed by law enforcement, was a quiet and sensitive community college student from a conservative background, those who knew him said.

“I never got weird energy from him,” one former classmate told Raw Story. “I never sensed any danger.”

But as the FBI attempts to establish what led Austin Tucker Martin to his death in the early hours of last Sunday, reports and social media posts by acquaintances reviewed by Raw Story suggest the 21-year-old was concerned about the ongoing publication of files related to the late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his links to powerful people — including President Trump.

One former classmate said Martin “did what he did in retaliation for what’s being allowed in this government.”

‘Shooting position’

As in the cases of Thomas Matthew Crooks and Ryan Routh, would-be assassins who targeted Trump in 2024, attempts to establish Martin’s motive continue.

Crooks was shot dead after using an assault rifle to shoot at Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania in July 2024, wounding the president’s ear. Routh, who that September lay in wait for Trump at one of his golf courses in West Palm Beach, Florida, was recently sentenced to life in prison.

In Martin’s case, the FBI investigation of his fatal arrival at Mar-a-Lago has included a tracing of the route the 21-year-old took to Florida, before allegedly driving through a gate at Trump’s resort at 1:30 a.m. on Sunday.

Trump was not in residence at the time.

Encountering two Secret Service agents and a Palm Beach County sheriff’s deputy, Martin raised the shotgun “to a shooting position,” investigators said.

In response to an inquiry from Raw Story, an FBI spokesperson declined to clarify whether the shotgun was loaded.

Investigators are also scrutinizing purchases and interactions with others, interviewing family and friends, and looking at social media, according to the FBI.

‘So shocking’

Around the time Martin showed up at Mar-a-Lago, a relative reportedly contacted the Moore County Sheriff’s Office to report him missing.

Moore County is renowned for its world-class golf courses and as a bedroom community for military veterans drawn to the area by nearby Fort Bragg.

Martin attended Sandhills Community College, where he was pursuing an associate degree in architectural engineering, a spokesperson confirmed to Raw Story. He had also worked at a local golf course.

Emma Witham, who graduated alongside Martin from Union Pines High School in 2023, recalled a classmate in her senior English class who was quiet and kind.

Based on a shared interest in art, Witham said, Martin asked for her social media usernames. The two exchanged messages on Snapchat, and Martin sent Witham comic-book style renderings of superheroes and rockets.

“I never got weird energy from him,” Witham told Raw Story. “I never sensed any danger. This was so shocking to me that something like this would happen so close to home.”

Although Witham said Martin didn’t speak about political beliefs, she told Raw Story she took him to be “probably a more conservative person, based on the area where we live. He was a Southern kid.”

Another former classmate, Keegan Platte, wrote in a Facebook post reviewed by Raw Story that Martin was a “heavily conservative Trump supporter” when he knew him as a freshman.

In the 2024 election, Moore County heavily favored Trump, giving him 64.1 percent of the vote compared to 34.7 percent to Democratic nominee Kamala Harris.

In 2022, Moore County was the site of an attack on two electrical substations resulting in a widespread power outage apparently timed to disrupt a drag show at a local theater. The event drew protests, with many opponents falsely accusing drag performers of “grooming” children.

The substation attack, which remains unsolved, was faulted for the death of an 87-year-old woman dependent on an oxygen machine.

‘Evil is real and unmistakable’

Martin appears to have been upset by recent revelations about Epstein and his links to powerful people including President Trump.

A shotgun and a gasoline canister A shotgun and a gasoline canister, in a photograph released by the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office. PBSO/via REUTERS

According to a text message obtained by TMZ, Martin told a coworker: “I don’t know if you read up on the Epstein Files, but evil is real and unmistakable.

“The best people like you and I can do is use what little influence we have,” Martin wrote. “Tell other people about what you hear about the Epstein files and what the government is doing. Raise awareness.”

Platte wrote on Facebook that he believes his former classmate at Union Pines High School “did what he did in retaliation for what’s being allowed in this government.”

Platte also hailed Martin as a “soldier,” saying that he “went out a hero, in my book, even if he didn’t succeed in his mission.”

Epstein was once a frequent guest at Mar-a-Lago, and although he and Trump reportedly severed ties in mid-2000s, their close association has become a source of increasing vexation for the president and his administration.

While no evidence has emerged that Trump’s association with Epstein involved criminal wrongdoing on the president’s part, NPR recently found that the Department of Justice withheld some files referencing allegations that Trump abused a minor from its congressionally mandated release of materials related to the Epstein case.

Raw Story was unable to reach Martin’s family members. A voicemail message recorded by Christina Fields, Martin’s aunt, said, “Please respect our family’s privacy as we grieve the loss of a family member, and do not leave any media inquiries on this voicemail.”

‘In the back’

Martin’s digital footprint appears to be limited to a Facebook page displaying his meticulous pencil drawings.

He received a tour of the Golf Club at Quail Ridge in Sanford, N.C. from the head golf pro about a year ago, after requesting permission to draw the greens, Chuck Smith, a club owner, told Raw Story.

Martin offered to split proceeds from selling the drawings and three were displayed in the gift shop, Smith said.

Smith said that after he learned about Martin’s death at Mar-a-Lago, he took the drawings down and stashed them “in the back.”

Smith said Martin worked at a different golf course: Pine Needles Lodge & Golf Club in Southern Pines.

A person who answered the phone at the front desk there hung up when asked about Martin. The club’s general manager did not respond to an email.

Agents from the FBI Charlotte office have searched the residence where Martin lived with his parents in Cameron, N.C. The FBI also appears to have taken an interest in Sandhills Community College, where Martin was a student.

“Our sympathies go out to the student’s family and friends,” Jennifer Pearce, marketing and public relations director for the college, told Raw Story. “We’re cooperating with the FBI.”

'Visceral rage': Family of 'Texas Antifa' defendants say judge wants hostile jury

The judge overseeing the so-called “Texas Antifa” case of nine defendants accused of attacking an ICE detention facility abruptly declared a mistrial on Tuesday, while scolding a defense lawyer for reportedly wearing a tee-shirt displaying civil rights icons.

But in a case widely seen as a test of the Trump administration strategy of criminalizing the antifascist movement and collectively punishing political opposition, friends and family members on the defendants’ support committee said they see another reason for the action by Judge Mark T. Pittman, who was appointed by President Donald Trump.

The jury pool, such observers say, was unexpectedly cool to the Trump administration generally and more specifically to federal immigration enforcement.

Amber Lowrey, whose sister Savanna Batten is among the Texas defendants, told Raw Story that when prosecutors questioned potential jurors, “a lot … spoke out about what ICE is doing and expressed disapproval for the Trump administration,” while “some had family members affected by deportation.”

Batten is charged with material support for terrorists. The basis for the charge, Lowrey said, was bringing a first aid kit to the Prairieland ICE facility on July 4 last year, where some defendants allegedly set off fireworks and vandalized property.

Batten, Lowrey said, had never met Benjamin Song, the only defendant charged with an act of violence, for the alleged nonfatal shooting of a police officer outside the facility.

Lowrey said court proceedings took a dramatic turn when a defense lawyer, MarQuetta Clayton, asked jurors to rate from one to five their agreement with the statement, “You cannot bring a gun to a protest.”

Responses were mixed, Lowrey said, but “neutral and disagree were more prominent than no, you absolutely cannot.”

At that point, Lowrey said, Pittman became “agitated” and told Clayton: “I don’t think you’re making good use of your time or the court’s time.”

After sending out the prospective jurors, Pittman scolded Clayton for her shirt, which reportedly depicted the Rev. Martin Luther King, Shirley Chisholm and “other civil rights protesters.”

Lowrey and other members of the support committee who watched from an overflow courtroom told Raw Story they were unable to make out the images on the shirt.

Pittman called a recess and said he was going to research the matter. When he returned, the judge announced he was declaring a mistrial.

Pittman appeared to be distressed by potential jurors’ responses to questioning by government and defense lawyers, Lowrey and other supporters said.

“He stated the jury had shown him that we are a ‘house divided,’” Lowrey said. “He said, ‘We’re too divided. We’re going to end up imploding on ourselves.’”

Lydia Koza, whose wife Autumn Hill is a defendant, said the judge made a remark about “fearing that his son would have to fight in a second civil war.”

‘Not going to get a fair trial’

Pittman ordered a new trial beginning on Monday.

“I believe the prosecution and the judge were not thrilled with the anti-ICE and anti-Trump sentiment in the jury pool,” Lowrey said. “I believe they are trying to roll the dice and get a more Trump-friendly jury.”

Support committee members also said it appeared clear that when a jury is selected and lawyers present arguments, defendants facing life imprisonment will have to closely regulate their emotions, to avoid drawing Pittman’s ire.

Lowrey told Raw Story she learned from her sister that federal marshals “told them that if they cry in court they will be removed from the courtroom because it makes the judge angry.

“They also told them that if they talk to, look at or ‘signal’ anyone in their family in court, the family will be removed from the courtroom and they will never see them in court again.”

“Visceral rage,” Lowrey said. “These people are not going to get a fair trial if this judge has anything to say about it.”

Katherine Miller, a spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Texas, had no comment.

Pittman could not be reached for this story.

Clayton’s law firm provided a statement saying she would not be able to speak publicly about Pittman’s displeasure over her shirt before conclusion of the trial and before a show cause hearing — indicating the judge is considering holding her in contempt.

‘Sheer volume of discovery’

Defense counsel have already been sanctioned in the case.

Last month, Pittman fined four lawyers $500 each for filing what he considered excessive and “frivolous” discovery motions.

Meanwhile, the judge is limiting the nine defendants’ time to make their case by denying a motion to expand the time allotted for each opening statement from eight to 20 minutes, while the government has 30 minutes.

Similarly, the government will have 45 minutes to make its closing argument, while each defendant will receive only 12 minutes.

Patrick McLain, the lawyer for defendant Zachary Evetts, said in a motion denied by Pittman that the time allotment violates his client’s Sixth Amendment right to effective counsel.

McLain said he plans to “challenge both the existence of a criminal conspiracy and the accuracy of the government witnesses’ description of events.”

The defendants are collectively challenging the government’s argument that their actions at the Prairieland ICE facility added up to an insurrectionary attack motivated by an ideological intent to overthrow the government.

Many of the defendants are expected to make arguments that differ from Song, as the one individual accused of firing a weapon.

While noting that the judge has called the case “complex” due to “the number of conspirators” and “sheer volume of discovery,” McLain said the time allotment is simply inadequate “to deliver an effective closing argument” and to address each of 10 counts his client faces.

The government has claimed the presence of firearms and body armor in a wagon and a parked car during the protest, along with first aid kits, proves that all nine defendants planned a violent attack.

‘Not risk of being killed’

Lawyers for the defendants previewed a potential Second Amendment defense during a probable cause and detention hearing last September, suggesting their clients’ actions were motivated by a concern they might need to defend themselves against state security forces.

Cross-examining FBI Special Agent Clark Wiethorn, the government’s chief fact witness, Cody Lee Cofer, Hill’s lawyer, said, “You’re telling me that it’s your opinion that it is not a risk for someone that is out protesting in the presence of law enforcement, for that person to be injured or killed by law enforcement?”

“A person peacefully protesting, I would say there’s not risk of being killed by law enforcement,” Wiethorn testified.

That was four months before two Border Patrol agents fatally shot Alex Pretti, an ICU nurse who was legally carrying a firearm, on a snowy street in Minneapolis.

That incident was greeted with widespread outrage, as Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem disparaged Pretti as a “domestic terrorist.”

Trump antifa terror claim faces stern test in trial of ICE firework protesters

A trial set to begin on Tuesday in Fort Worth, Texas will test whether President Donald Trump’s Department of Justice can use a criminalized notion of “antifa” to convict nine anti-ICE activists of attempted murder and terrorism, after they shot fireworks and vandalized government vehicles.

On July 4 last year, most of the defendants showed up at the Prairieland ICE detention facility 25 miles south of Fort Worth to put on a fireworks display for immigrant detainees. A smaller group used spray paint to graffiti vehicles in the parking lot.

They dressed in black and concealed their faces with masks — a tactic commonly known as “black bloc.” One activist, former Marine Corps reservist Benjamin Song, carried an AR-15 rifle. A wagon nearby was stocked with an additional rifle, body armor and bottled water. One activist had guns in his car.

The defendants say they intended to hold a noise demonstration and set off fireworks to cheer up detainees. The government claims the fireworks were meant to draw officers out of the facility and elicit a law enforcement response.

About 45 minutes after the activists arrived, the government alleges, Song opened fire and struck a local police officer, Lt. Thomas Gross, who returned fire. Treated for his injuries, Gross was able to return to full duty within two months.

The indictment suggests that when the shots were fired, the other activists intended to retrieve guns and escalate an attack, based at least in part on a command allegedly yelled by Song: “Get to the rifles!”

Statements from some defendants and their lawyers suggest they were blindsided by the shooting and fled in terror.

The 12-count indictment, which describes the group as an “antifa cell,” charges four defendants alongside Song with attempted murder of law enforcement officers, even though the government acknowledges Song was the only shooter. A larger cohort is charged alongside Song with providing material support for terrorists.

‘Criminalizing speech’

Following the assassination last September of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk, President Trump issued an executive order “designating antifa as a domestic terrorist organization.” The order describes “antifa” — a decentralized movement of people who oppose fascism — as “a militaristic, anarchist enterprise that explicitly calls for the overthrow of the United States government, law enforcement authorities, and our system of law.”

About three weeks later, the first indictment against the Prairieland defendants repeated the language of Trump’s order almost completely.

The indictment described the defendants as members of “a North Texas Antifa cell,” while defining “antifa” as “a militant enterprise made up of individuals and small groups … which explicitly calls for the overthrow of the United States government, law enforcement authorities, and the system of law.”

As part of the government’s effort to build an “enterprise” case around the defendants’ supposed adherence to “antifa” ideology and hold them jointly liable for the shooting, prosecutors have highlighted some defendants’ involvement in printing political literature.

The indictment describes three as being “part of a group that created and distributed insurrectionary materials called ‘zines.’”

During their detention hearing last September, FBI Special Agent Joseph Clark Wiethorn described a search warrant executed on the Fort Worth home of defendants Ines and Elizabeth Soto, a married couple.

“We discovered, for lack of a better word, a printing production with multiple commercial-grade equipment, paper binders, cutters, industrial copiers, all for producing what we have discovered to be anarchist-type material and reading,” Wiethorn testified.

The government plans to call Kyle Shideler, director for homeland security and counterterrorism at the far-right Center for Security Policy, as an expert witness.

Shideler endorsed the government’s definition of “antifa” in the Prairieland case before a U.S. Senate subcommittee last October. He touted the material support for terrorists statute as a tool to crack down on “antifa.”

“These networks can be targeted for engaging in material support for terrorism,” Shideler told lawmakers. “We are not talking about speech; we are talking about manifestos describing how to overthrow the government and how to do that with violence.”

Lydia Koza, whose wife Autumn Hill is among the defendants charged with attempted murder, told Raw Story she believes the government’s case is all about speech.

“They’re trying to throw everybody who could be even slightly ideologically opposed to Trump into this bucket of ‘antifa’ so they can be prosecuted,” she said.

“This is a huge reason why this case should be alarming to everyone. This is criminalizing speech. There are precedents in American history, and none of them are good.”

‘Peaceful demonstration’

“My understanding is that everybody thought this was pretty standard and intended to be a peaceful demonstration, a noise demonstration,” Koza said. “Everybody anticipated coming home.”

Hill was arrested the day after the July 4 action, when the FBI broke down her door in the middle of dinner and marched her outside barefoot.

During Hill’s detention hearing, Agent Wiethorn testified that he didn’t know where Hill was in proximity to Song when the shooting took place, or even if she was still at the detention facility.

Cody Cofer, Hill’s lawyer, asked Wiethorn to explain how Hill “helped” Song.

“I think by participating in the attack with Mr. Song would be helping him,” Wiethorn replied.

“And so, how did Ms. Hill participate in the attack?” Cofer asked.

“With the presence with — showing up in black bloc — showing up and shooting off fireworks into the facility, participating in this group that had organized themselves, had planned, had prepared, had brought weapons, body armor, medical kits,” Wiethorn said.

The indictment charges Hill, Song and three others with the attempted murder of not only the police officer who responded to the scene, but also of two ICE corrections officers who were not injured.

Similarly, the lawyer for Elizabeth Soto asked Agent Wiethorn if there was any evidence her client “was anything but present” on the night of the shooting.

Wiethorn said Soto participated in planning chats on Signal, although elsewhere he testified that there had been no discussion of shooting at police. Wiethorn also said Soto traveled to the event with her husband, who brought “multiple trauma kits.”

Soto “was aware of what they were doing, was part of this group that had an understanding of overall intent,” the agent testified.

‘Six inches from being murdered’

Zachary Evetts, a defendant charged with attempted murder, told Anne Speckhard, a psychology professor who interviewed him in pre-trial detention, he went to Prairieland anticipating a “peaceful, although loud” demonstration, according to an expert report she submitted on his behalf.

Evetts told Speckhard, who leads the International Center for the Study of Violent Extremism at Georgetown University, he was terrified when he heard gunshots.

“I’m running and see two correction officers, one female, and there is gunfire to the left of me,” Evetts said. “I was afraid I was going to get shot. I was very afraid. I have to run now or I’ll die.”

Speckhard concluded that the “available evidence establishes that the defendants prepared for a noise demonstration involving fireworks … undermining claims of planned violent escalation.”

Prosecutors have asked Judge Mark Pittman to remove Speckhard as an expert witness, objecting to “improper opinion testimony.” Pittman said last week Speckhard’s language “gives the court pause” but declined to bar her testimony, saying he was open to revisiting the matter at trial.

Koza told Raw Story she believes the government included Hill in the case because to do otherwise would be a tacit acknowledgement that shooting off fireworks doesn’t add up to a conspiracy to escalate a violent attack.

“One of the things I noticed during the preliminary hearing is that the government is careful to not say, ‘Protest,’” Koza said. “They say, ‘Ambush, ambush, ambush,’ and, ‘Attack, attack, attack.’ They want to say that it isn’t possible that anything legitimate happened that night. I think prosecuting her is part of making the case that there is no good protester in this instance.”

During the detention hearing last September, previewing the argument the government is likely to make at trial, Assistant U.S. Attorney Shawn Smith cited anarchist zines printed in the Sotos’ garage.

“These individuals were involved in a long-running conspiracy that started with this philosophy centered around what I’ve called and labeled the printers,” Smith said. “They’re the ideological heads of this group. They are rendering assistance passing this information, this antifa information, this deep-seated hatred of the government.”

Moving on to the gunfire on July 4 outside the ICE facility, Smith again cited black bloc, fireworks and vandalism.

“They acted in concert,” he said, adding: “They don’t have to each hold a gun, but they’re part of a common plan and scheme: Destruction and murder. Attempted murder in this case. Six inches from being murdered.”

Beyond the potential culpability of the eight defendants involved in setting off fireworks, vandalism and producing zines, the actions of Song, the one person alleged to have fired a weapon, loom over the trial.

During the detention hearing, Song’s lawyer wrested an acknowledgement from Agent Wiethorn that he didn’t know if Lt. Thomas Gross unholstered his weapon before Song fired.

Speckhard wrote that “available evidence establishes that the shooting was not premeditated or coordinated and may have occurred as an impulsive response to aggressive police action by a single individual, rather than as part of a planned or directed attack.”

Prosecutors plan to call Gross to testify. In a witness list filed with the court, Song indicated he intends to take the stand in his own defense.

Ex-Jack Smith deputy rebukes Bondi after House hearing — and mounts Dem run for Congress

JP Cooney, a former federal prosecutor turned Democratic candidate for the U.S. House in Virginia’s proposed Seventh District, rebuked his former boss, Attorney General Pam Bondi, for telling a House panel on Wednesday his former division engaged in “weaponization.”

“I can tell you which administration that the weaponization was ended under,” Bondi said in a fiery exchange with Rep. Joe Neguse (D-CO) during a House Judiciary Committee hearing.

Cooney, a former top deputy to special counsel Jack Smith who helped prosecute President Donald Trump, was fired from the Department of Justice last February, as part of a purge at the public integrity section when Bondi took over.

He told Raw Story the Trump administration had converted the DOJ “from a tool of justice into a political tool to support Donald Trump.”

“I worked in the public integrity section for years,” Cooney said. “I served in Republican administrations and Democratic administrations.

“The Justice Department that I worked in always served the rule of law. We conducted every investigation without fear or favor. That’s no longer the case, much less with a president like this one who has converted it into his own weapon.”

On the Hill, Neguse also questioned Bondi about the hiring of the former FBI agent Jared Wise as a senior DOJ advisor, after Wise was charged with assaulting law enforcement during the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

“This is who you choose as the chief law enforcement officer of the United States of America to hire at the Department of Justice — someone on video yelling, ‘Kill ’em,’ at police officers?” Neguse asked.

“I believe he was pardoned by President Trump,” Bondi said.

“Oh, he was pardoned,” Neguse said. “… Pardoned by President Trump for his offense. Pardoned for yelling, ‘Kill ’em,’ at police officers. And yet you expect hard-working police officers across the country to believe that you take law enforcement seriously.”

Bondi offered no further comment.

Cooney told Raw Story the exchange “should tell you everything you need to know about why Americans have lost trust in the Justice Department, and the threat it poses to the public.”

‘Could not be more proud’

Smith’s election subversion indictment against Trump for conspiracy to defraud the United States, which Cooney helped prosecute, highlighted January 6 as a consequence of Trump’s campaign to overturn the 2020 election.

After then-Vice President Mike Pence made it known that he would not join Trump’s scheme, the indictment charged, “a large and angry crowd — including many individuals whom [Trump] had deceived into believing the vice president could and might change the election results — violently attacked the Capitol and halted the proceeding.

“As violence ensued,” Trump and his co-conspirators “exploited the disruption by redoubling efforts to levy false claims of election fraud and convince members of Congress to further delay the certification based on those claims.”

Smith moved to dismiss criminal charges arising from his work in November 2024, after Trump won re-election, then filed his final report in January 2025, before Trump returned to the White House.

A prominent target of Trump and supporters, who claim victimization, Smith testified before Congress last month, strongly defending his work and that of his team.

Cooney told Raw Story he “could not be more proud” of his work with Smith, and “could not be more proud of the integrity, independence that [Smith] displayed and that everyone in that office displayed.”

Cooney said he was motivated to run for Congress by the lawlessness of the Trump administration.

“I’m going to bring the experience that I have — 18 years at the Justice Department prosecuting cases against the most powerful lawbreakers — to bear on this unprecedented circumstance, to stand up against lawbreakers like Donald Trump, to restore civility and competence to government.”

‘Abuses of power’

Cooney also pointed to recent events in Minneapolis, saying the death of Alex Pretti, an ICU nurse, at the hands of Border Patrol agents helped him decide to run.

“There’s no question that when I learned about the Border Patrol’s killing of Alex Pretti, a man who was engaged in lawful, constitutional activity, and I heard Secretary Kristi Noem’s despicable slander [of Pretti], I was motivated to stand up and run for office, to provide the kind of leadership that is so desperately needed,” Cooney said.

“We have a Republican Congress that is complicit in the abuses of power that Secretary Noem has carried out.”

In the immediate aftermath of Pretti’s death, Noem said Pretti had intended to kill law enforcement officers. Pretti was licensed to carry a gun which he did not draw. Agents removed it before Pretti was shot multiple times.

‘Lawless playbook’

Before he can begin to hold Trump accountable as a member of the legislative branch, Cooney will have to win election in a cycle in which Trump has signaled an intention to interfere — telling former FBI deputy director Dan Bongino that Republicans should “take over the voting” in “15 places.”

Fulton County raid FBI agents at the Fulton County Election Hub and Operation Center in Union City, Georgia. REUTERS/Alyssa Pointer

The FBI recently seized 2020 ballots from an election center outside Atlanta, based on a search warrant containing omissions one former FBI lawyer said DOJ supervisors would typically “flag and send back.”

Cooney’s campaign rhetoric echoes the prosecutorial case Jack Smith’s team made in the indictment filed against Trump in August 2023.

“What I see now is an indication of Donald Trump’s realization that he’s lost the confidence and lost the trust of the American people,” Cooney told Raw Story.

“This is the same lawless playbook that he turned to after the 2020 election, to defraud Americans of their rightful results of that election.

“It gives me great hope for our future, because it demonstrates that Americans have lost confidence in the president and are prepared to stand up and restore us to a respected, principled and faithful nation.”