On Wednesday, a House Oversight impeachment hearing went off the rails in its first few minutes.
As witnesses were giving their opening statements, ranking member Jamie Raskin (D-MD) wondered why Republican witnesses were allowed to attend remotely while Democratic witnesses were not allowed to in the past.
"To be able to testify remotely requires a letter from me and approval from the majority leader, which we have," Chair James Comer (R-KY) replied.
Rep. Dan Goldman (D-NY) asked for a parliamentary inquiry into evidence one of the witnesses had referred to.
ALSO READ: Trump campaign hit with new warning about taking illegal donations
"Mr. Chairman, Mr. [Tony] Bobulinski just referred to text messages that I believe he is referring to photos of a BlackBerry," Goldman explained before being interrupted.
"What's your parliamentary inquiry?" Comer demanded. "State your parliamentary inquiry, because we've got a very important hearing here and we don't have time for stunts!"
"It's not a stunt!" Goldman insisted.
"You don't have a parliamentary inquiry," Comer said, moving on to the next witness.
Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.
For customer support contact support@rawstory.com.
Trending
YOUR OPINION MATTERS
Should Howard Lutnick be investigated for his ties to the Nvidia scandal?
VOTE NOW