MSN

Donald Trump's recent visit to Georgia has reopened old ugly wounds from his 2020 loss to President Joe Biden, exposing deep fractures within the state's Republican Party, that has moderate Republicans and the far-right MAGA faction locked in an escalating civil war over the party's direction.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Georgia Republicans are embroiled in a "family feud" that has longtime GOP leaders concerned about the fallout in November's general election. The Journal reports: "Heading into midterms that will determine control of Congress, party leaders in Atlanta and Washington had hoped to build party loyalty and unity in Georgia," yet recent developments are causing significant concern among senior officials.

The infighting has become particularly acute in three critical races—governor, Senate, and a House seat—marked by lawsuits, ethics complaints, and aggressive advertising. The Journal's Cameron McWhirter and Lindsay Wise note: "MAGA activists, long accustomed to branding many elected Republicans as RINOs (Republicans in Name Only), are now turning on each other."

Former Georgia GOP official B.J. Van Gundy acknowledged the severity: "Am I anxious? Yes. I hope we have time to fix this." Former state GOP chairman Rusty Paul agreed, stating: "The dysfunction has damaged the ability of Republicans to elect candidates."

The damage has proven so extensive that national GOP leadership has effectively conceded the Senate race held by Jon Ossoff (D), redirecting resources and attention elsewhere.

The governor's race has deteriorated into a bitter contest. A mysterious political action committee called Georgians for Integrity, whose funding source remains unknown, has spent approximately $17 million attacking Lt. Gov. Burt Jones, Trump's endorsed candidate, with ads calling him "shady." The Georgia GOP subsequently filed an ethics complaint against the group.

Democrats have taken notice of the Republican dysfunction. Democratic state chairman Charlie Bailey bluntly admitted to the Journal: "These idiots are making our jobs a lot easier."

You can read more here.

Billionaire Elon Musk’s relocation from California to Texas was accompanied by his creation of a shadowy and complex network of companies he controls, making it difficult to follow the money as he continues to mix personal with professional expenditures.

According to a New York Times investigation, Musk's "secretive network" of more than 90 Texas-based companies enabled him to conceal the extent of his financial support for Donald Trump's 2024 presidential campaign. That support subsequently granted Musk a position in the Oval Office as a presidential adviser.

At least 37 of these companies serve Musk's personal needs, including property management, aircraft maintenance, and land acquisition. The Times notes that the distinction between personal and business expenditures remains deliberately ambiguous.

Musk employed private companies to finance his political activities in ways that circumvented standard disclosure requirements. The Times reported: "Tapping these companies to cover the expenses of a super PAC is highly unusual, campaign finance experts said, and ended up obscuring how money was being spent because they are not subject to the disclosure requirements of super PACs."

Musk primarily uses limited liability companies (LLCs), which provide both legal protection and reduced public accountability.

In 2024, Musk established two companies—United States of America Inc. and Group America LLC—and utilized Europa 100 LLC, an existing company previously used for personal expenses like nanny payments, along with his family office, Excession. Together, these entities provided nearly $80 million in services to America PAC, his political action committee supporting Trump's reelection. Rather than America PAC itself absorbing these costs, the companies took responsibility for expenses, a practice campaign finance experts characterized as highly irregular.

Brendan Fischer, director at Campaign Legal Center, confirmed the arrangement was legally permissible but effectively obscured the destination of tens of millions of dollars.

Europa 100 also compensated America PAC's treasurer, Chris Young, with a salary potentially reaching $1 million, according to campaign finance filings, though his specific role at the company remained unclear. Young also participated in a retirement plan through Excession.

You can read more here.

The Supreme Court's 6-3 decision limiting Donald Trump's unilateral tariff authority has significantly weakened his trade negotiators' position by eliminating their most potent weapon.

According to reporting from Politico, the ruling has shifted the balance of power in trade discussions. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer faced immediate pressure from the U.K.'s chief negotiator, Peter Kyle, who implicitly threatened to block a trade agreement unless the United States honored a deal setting duties at 10 percent.

Without the ability to arbitrarily adjust tariff rates, Trump officials have adopted a "more conciliatory approach in the hope of averting further setbacks to Trump's trade agenda."

Trump has publicly insisted that countries attempting to exploit the Supreme Court decision will face even higher tariffs, stating: "Any Country that wants to 'play games' with the ridiculous supreme court decision, especially those that have 'Ripped Off' the U.S.A. for years, and even decades, will be met with a much higher Tariff, and worse." However, administration insiders acknowledge a marked shift in strategy.

Former Biden official Peter Harrell suggested the practical impact may be limited: "The ability to compel implementation of these deals is weakened a little bit [by the Supreme Court ruling], but not significantly. I think that there is kind of enough other tariff threat, enough other non-tariff threat, and also, frankly, enough inducement in these deals that by and large, the governments that have agreed to the deals will continue to honor them."

The ruling has also emboldened domestic opposition to trade agreements in some countries. Taiwan's opposition party has threatened to block approval of its agreement with the Trump administration, which imposed 15 percent tariff rates on most Taiwanese goods—higher than the current 10 percent global duty. The party has used the Supreme Court decision as justification to renegotiate the terms with the United States.

You can read more here.