Top Stories Daily Listen Now
RawStory
RawStory

All posts tagged "jeffrey epstein"

DOJ silent on Epstein files deadline as state prosecutor ponders lawsuit: report

The Department of Justice won't say if met a deadline to hand over records related to a property owned by the notorious child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, The Guardian reported Saturday.

The Justice department did not confirm whether it met New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez's July 31 deadline to share information about abuse at Epstein's Zorro Ranch, according to The Guardian.

Zorro Ranch is mentioned thousands of times in the Epstein files, along with numerous photos of men and young girls who stayed, according to The Guardian.

Epstein survivors reported abuse at the ranch that never reached state or federal authorities, state representatives have said.

More information came to light after a tipster broke into the ranch and handed evidence to New Mexico Democratic lawmakers.

In February, the New Mexico state House unanimously created a Truth Commission to investigate issues at the property and potential official complicity in covering up crimes.

The Guardian noted that no federal search of Zorro Ranch has ever been confirmed to have taken place, unlike with other Epstein properties in Palm Beach, New York and in the Caribbean.

Torrez's deadline was set for DOJ prosecutors and the U.S. Attorney's office for the Southern District of New York, which led the original Epstein investigation, according to The Guardian.

Torrez sought access to whatever documents they had.

In a July 14 letter to Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, Torrez said that he would "pursue all available legal remedies without further notice" if the DOJ missed the July 31 deadline to turn over records.

The same week, Torrez said in an interview, "I'm not taking anything off the table. I'm not ruling out a lawsuit."

Lawyer rips Epstein adviser's 'gross' claim about 'American hero': 'Shame on her'

An attorney for several survivors of Jeffrey Epstein said he was "appalled" on Thursday after a high-powered corporate attorney who advised the late child sex offender told lawmakers that she did not view Virginia Giuffre as a "credible witness."

Attorney Arick Fudali, who represents 11 Epstein survivors, told CNN anchor Boris Sanchez he was stunned to learn about the comments from attorney Kathy Ruemmler, the former Goldman Sachs general counsel, who was questioned behind closed doors by the House Oversight Committee earlier this month about her relationship with the financier.

Ruemmler told congressional leaders that she thought Giuffre, one of the most prominent accusers of Epstein and his co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell, "lacked inherent credibility."

Ruemmler's comment has left Giuffre's family furious, and Fudali shared his reaction with CNN.

"It's appalling. It's gross. You know, any adjective you can possibly think of and [it's] really offensive for her to say that about Ms. Giuffre, who, in my opinion, is an American hero, someone who suffered greatly and someone who inspired so many other survivors, not just of Jeffrey Epstein, but of sexual abuse around the world," Fudali said.

"Ms. Giuffre is the reason, I know personally, that a lot of women were able to feel comfortable, feel strong, and feel empowered enough to step forward," Fudali added. "So shame on her for saying anything of the sort. Anything, especially casting doubt on Ms. Giuffre's allegations."

Scrambling DOJ rushed to shut Epstein case as 'flag list' surfaced big names: new docs

Days after an explosive meeting at the White House Situation Room last July to address a crisis threatening to engulf the Trump administration, FBI Director Kash Patel sought clarity on how the scandal might implicate powerful men linked to Jeffrey Epstein.

Addressing Patel as “Boss” and citing a prior discussion between the two, an FBI official from the bureau’s Information Management Division responded by sending the director an email with a collection of spreadsheets named “Flagged Items Lists.”

Based on guidance calling on FBI personnel tasked with redacting materials from the Epstein files to “flag items of interest for discussion with DOJ attorneys,” the FBI official informed Patel that “the list included public figures, potentially classified information, potential CSAM [child sex abuse material], etc.”

The guidance to flag these sensitive items from the Epstein files came from the Department of Justice, Assistant Director Shannon Parry informed Patel. Heading the effort for the Department of Justice was Todd Blanche, then the deputy attorney general and formerly President Donald Trump’s criminal defense lawyer. Blanche is now awaiting confirmation as attorney general from the U.S. Senate.

The email from Parry and other documents about sensitive items flagged for review by the DOJ, including references to public figures, was quietly released by the FBI last week and are being reported here for the first time.

The materials in the “Flagged Items List” had already been turned over to the Department of Justice four months earlier, Parry told Patel in the July 21, 2025 email.

“These items were produced as part of the approved Project Plan per DOJ’s guidance to flag items of interest for discussion with DOJ attorneys as we redacted."

The internal discussion at the FBI about public figures potentially implicated in the scandal was starkly different from an awkward public memo jointly released with the DOJ exactly two weeks earlier that cited “an exhaustive review of investigative holdings relating to Jeffrey Epstein” and the federal agencies’ “commitment to transparency.”

The materials, the agencies said, “did not expose any additional third parties to allegations of illegal wrongdoing” and “did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.”

A DOJ spokesperson told Raw Story that “any guidance on how or what to flag was given for the purpose of general awareness in preparation for disclosure.”

The spokesperson’s statement is jarringly at odds with the July 7, 2025 memo that was a product of the document review. The memo specifically stated that it was the “determination” of the DOJ and FBI “that no further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted.”

The DOJ did not respond to a request for clarification on the statement.

Email from FBI Information Management Division Assistant Director Shannon Parry to Director Kash Patel, July 21, 2025Courtesy FBI

Two weeks after the release of the DOJ and FBI memo attempting to put concerns about Epstein to rest, Parry was forwarding Patel materials specifically flagged so top administration officials could scrutinize possible links between powerful men and the notorious sex trafficker’s most heinous crimes.

The email included a list of six criminal cases linked to Epstein, among them an FBI investigation launched by the Miami Field Office in 2006. That case file includes a video file capturing a 2009 FBI sting operation resulting in the arrest of Alfredo Rodriguez, the former house manager for Epstein’s home in Palm Beach, Florida, on suspicion of selling a so-called “black book” containing phone numbers of young women and girls that Epstein abused.

A description of the video capturing the conversation between Rodriguez and an FBI undercover employee that was flagged for the DOJ’s review contains just the sort of details about potential involvement by Epstein associates that Trump’s supporters had avidly sought.

“The two talked about the girls (victims), others employed by Epstein and Epstein’s associates,” the description reads. “The two discussed things that happened between the girls (victims) and Epstein’s associates. There are associates named during the conversation.”

Aside from Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s partner who was convicted of sex trafficking in 2021, the description does not name any of the associates cited by Rodriguez. But when the video was released along with millions of other records through the Epstein Files Transparency Act in January 2026, the associates mentioned by Rodriguez were revealed to be former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak and attorney Alan Dershowitz, among others.

“Here, Mr. Epstein says, ‘Mr. Barak, I’ll fly you to New York.’ And some of the girls that came along the way,” Rodriguez says in the video, which Raw Story reviewed. “You can bring this guy down like in no time.”

Barak told the Wall Street Journal in 2023 that he met with Epstein at his various mansions, but “never participated in any party or any other ‘inappropriate’ event with him” and “never met with girls or minors, not even with adult women in the context of any inappropriate behavior.”

Rodriguez told the FBI undercover employee that Dershowitz would typically sit at the pool with a glass of wine. Although there was “hanky-panky” upstairs, Rodriguez said he never saw any indication that he took part, although there were sometimes naked or topless girls around the pool.

Rodriguez was convicted of obstruction of justice in 2012 for hiding the “black book” and attempting to sell it. He died from cancer in 2014, after serving his sentence.

“Rodriguez’s testimony has been completely discredited,” Dershowitz told Raw Story. “He was a criminal. I never saw any females at the pool — naked, topless or otherwise. Complete fabrication.”

Dershowitz was also flagged by the FBI as a public figure linked to Epstein around the time of the controversial memo and the meeting of top officials at the Situation Room to strategize about how to insulate Trump from the furor surrounding the administration’s handling of the Epstein files.

Leslie Backshies, a special agent in charge at the New York Field Office sent an email to FBI colleagues on July 10 alerting them that Dershowitz was “referenced in the Jeffrey Epstein child sex trafficking investigation” in two FBI witness interviews. Minutes later, Charles Yarbrough, assistant director of the FBI’s Criminal Investigation Division, forwarded the email to Patel.

“Dershowitz was not considered a subject in this investigation and no evidence was uncovered during the investigation to suggest Dershowitz was involved in the abuse of minors,” Backshies wrote. She went on to summarize the two witness interviews.

In one, a former employee of Epstein’s said Dershowitz received a massage from an unnamed person, but that the massage was considered “to be more professional and different than the massages the girls provided.”

Another witness told the FBI that they met Dershowitz at Epstein’s home when he was alone without his wife and he received a massage — in contradiction to a public statement previously made by Dershowitz.

“Both proffers are provably false,” Dershowitz told Raw Story. “I never had sexual contact with anyone other than my wife since the day I met Jeffrey Epstein. I never did anything improper with regard to Epstein. I have been the victim of disprovably false accusations. I asked the FBI to investigate the false allegations against me.”

The FBI did not respond to a detailed set of questions for this story.

Blanche, who is up for confirmation as attorney general, wrote in response to a question posed by Sens. Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Mazie Hirono (D-HI) that “the FBI pursued all investigative leads in its investigations into Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.” To Hirono, Blanche wrote: “Consistent with the long-standing principles of federal prosecution as outlined in the Justice Manual, several experienced prosecutors and investigators have reviewed the materials and determined that additional prosecutions are unavailable at this time.

In response to questions from senators, Blanche refused to comment on whether the Department of Justice has initiated any new investigations related to Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring since the beginning of the second Trump administration.

The documents were released by the FBI in in response to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by the nonprofit Democracy Forward Foundation.

"Despite the Trump-Vance administration's attempts to forestall transparency into its handling of the Epstein files with delay tactics, Democracy Forward will keep fighting in court to ensure the public has access to more of these important documents," said Dan McGrath, special counsel for oversight at the nonprofit.

Comer blasts Epstein associate stonewalling on demands: ‘This is unacceptable'

House Oversight Committee lawmakers were furious Friday after they received only one non-disclosure agreement involving Leon Black, a former associate of Jeffrey Epstein, according to reports.

The committee had issued a subpoena for Black, the Apollo Global Management founder, demanding all NDAs Black allegedly has related to the late convicted sex offender and his co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell, Politico reported.

A spokesperson for Chair James Comer (R-KY) did not mince words — and signaled what would come next.

"Leon Black isn’t acting in good faith," the spokesperson said. "The Committee agreed to extend the deadline two weeks for full production of all NDAs and his attorney has deliberately chosen to only produce one. This is unacceptable and the Committee will follow up with his attorney."

Black's attorney, Susan Estrich, confirmed she turned over a single NDA, one struck between Black and Guzel Ganieva, a woman he was once romantically involved with. That relationship ended with Black paying Ganieva roughly $9.5 million. Estrich says Epstein, who died by suicide in 2019, knew about the agreement. Ganieva later sued Black over allegations of sexual misconduct and defamation, but a judge threw out the case in 2023.

"The responsive information includes the only confidentiality agreement that predated Epstein’s death and the only one of which Epstein was aware. Epstein was not involved with drafting this agreement," Estrich said in a statement. "This confidentiality agreement with Guzel Ganieva resolved her attempts to extort Mr. Black."

"The New York State Supreme Court dismissed Ms. Ganieva’s baseless lawsuit against Mr. Black with prejudice and that decision was affirmed by an appellate court," Estrich's said. "Ms. Ganieva expressly acknowledged that she never met Epstein."

But Congress was not just after one relationship's paper trail.

Comer has called the material tied to Epstein and Maxwell as "vital" to keeping the investigation moving, and issued the subpoena in the first place only after Black refused to answer questions about the agreements directly.

"We need the NDAs to be able to move forward with the investigation," Comer said.

Shouting match erupts after MAGA commentator makes striking claim about the Epstein files

Two political commentators got into a heated shouting match over whether more action needs to be taken on the Epstein files.

During a late-night panel discussion, progressive podcaster Brian Tyler Cohen spoke about Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and argued that he was elevated because he knows how to protect Trump from the Epstein files.

MAGA radio show host Jason Rantz responded to Cohen's comments by asking, "What crime did Trump commit as it relates directly to Epstein?" Rantz argued that Trump isn't criminally implicated in the Epstein files.

"You're mentioning that he's in the files with the implication, of course, that a crime was committed," Rantz continued. "And yet for four years under the previous president, they didn't charge him with anything because there's actually no evidence to suggest that he committed a crime."

Cohen tried to make the point that no one has seen the full Epstein files, so they don't know if Trump committed a crime, and Rantz was asked whether he had seen the files.

When Rantz said that he had, Cohen followed up by asking, "You've seen the other 3 million files?"

"Not everything," Rantz said. "But you're suggesting a crime was committed."

Cohen and Rantz talked over each other, but Rantz repeated his point about the Biden administration not taking action if there were a crime.

Cohen responded, "I'm suggesting that we should probably see the other half of the files that haven't been released."

Rantz called it "the position you only magically started to take in the last two years, not one during the Biden administration."

Cohen pointed out that Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted under the Biden administration, and Rantz asked, "Who should we charge next?"

"Why are you defending the suppressing of 3 million files?" Cohen shouted.

Rantz shouted back some of his previous points while Cohen yelled, "Why are you defending pedophiles?"

'Getting away with it': Todd Blanche's evasive maneuvers in hearing alarm legal experts

A pair of veteran prosecutors sounded the alarm as Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche seems to be "getting away with it."

During a Wednesday episode of Civil Discourse, former federal prosecutors Joyce Vance and Harry Litman weighed in on the first day of Blanche's confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, but were disappointed by the questions from senators so far.

"Todd Blanche is getting away with it," Vance said. "He has not had any significant trouble. Some of the questions have been good... but nothing seems to be touching Blanche. His demeanor continues to be abrasive."

The questions that Vance liked came from Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI), "who I just heard was excellent," Vance said. She also noted that "some clips" will be played, like Blanche's slip-up when he said he's Trump's lawyer, "and then he corrects himself and he says, 'I was his lawyer,'" Vance said.

"That was a telling moment," Vance said, but her impression is that Blanche seems to be coming away from most of the questioning fine.

"He's assertive, and there's a little bit of quiet outrage," Vance said.

Litman said, "You can sort of turn the volume off to see how it's going."

Hirono is the only one who "had a little bit of energy and fervor and sense that this was important. All in all, maybe it's just how senators act," Litman said.

"There doesn't feel to be anything near the kind of gravity that you and I, and commentators on the Department of Justice have been really emphasizing based on completely unprecedented conduct on his part. So it feels like the proceedings are not really up to the moment," Litman said.

"Todd Blanche has corrupted the Justice Department," Vance agreed. "He is unfit to serve as the Attorney General, and when he's confronted with that, the best he can do is say, 'Well, the president can do whatever he wants when it comes to pardons.'"

Read on Substack

Epstein enjoyed humiliating Trump for needing to 'hitch rides' on his plane: biographer

Sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein enjoyed mocking Trump because he would constantly ask to "hitch rides" on his plane, a biographer revealed.

During an episode of Inside Trump's Head, biographer Michael Wolff, who spent years interviewing Epstein and then chronicled Trump's political career, said that Trump bumming plane rides off Epstein was a "constant point of friction."

Wolff and co-host Joanna Coles were talking about the Boeing 747 gifted to Trump by Qatar, and Wolff explained that Trump has "always invested in his planes." To illustrate how Trump overspent on his planes, he talked about how he had to start relying on Epstein for plane rides.

"This constant point of friction between Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump was that Trump often could not afford to fly his own plane, so he had to hitch rides with Epstein," Wolff said. "Epstein would constantly remind him of this, so that became Epstein's dominance over Trump."

Wolff said Trump "becomes invested" in his planes because "it is that stand-in for his power, his dominance, his ability to be the commander," but he noted that other billionaires are the same way.

"Whenever you are with billionaires, one of the subjects that always comes up is their airplanes, and often that their airplanes are broken and the maintenance requirements of these airplanes," Wolff said. "So it apparently gets under the skin of all people who own their own airplanes, but particularly this is a Donald Trump thing."

Wolff said he's heard "countless stories" that are "worrisome" about Trump getting upset about his planes. Trump notably subpoenaed four New York Times journalists on Friday after he was humiliated by their reporting on the security concerns of his Qatari jet.

Trump FIFA scandal echoes of secret call that ties him to Epstein's world: biographer

A Trump biographer flagged how a secret call Donald Trump made to an NFL owner ties him to Epstein's Palm Beach world.

During an episode of Inside Trump's Head, Trump biographer Michael Wolff explained how Trump made a call to get New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft off the hook after he was caught in a massage parlor sting in 2019.

"This would be in the first administration," Wolff explained. "His friend Bob Kraft, who owns the New England Patriots, is in trouble because he's been busted for frequenting Korean massage parlors in Palm Beach, and it's not a good moment for Bob."

Wolff explained that in addition to "legal difficulties," Kraft was dealing with the threat of losing his team at the hands of NFL commissioner Roger Goodell.

"A commissioner can threaten sanctions or remove you from team ownership," Wolff said. "This was a major moment."

While Kraft was going to massage parlors in Palm Beach, Jeffrey Epstein was operating in West Palm Beach, Wolff noted. Around the time Kraft's scandal came to light, the public was learning about Epstein. Wolff also recounted a joke he heard from Epstein, who said, "Bob Kraft gets take-out, and I get take-in."

Wolff also remembers Trump stepping in to help "his friend, Bob Kraft," and a moment where "Donald Trump is on the phone with him" while sitting as the president.

"Donald Trump is advising him on how to handle a sex scandal, which he's got some experience with," Wolff recalled. "And Trump says, 'Don't worry about Roger. I'll take care of him.'"

When co-host Joanna Coles asked what happened, Wolff explained, "Well, nothing," and Kraft continued to own the Patriots while the scandal faded.

"He still is Bob Kraft, has been returned to being a respected member of the billionaire community," Wolff said. "He married a shrink much younger than him, and they live happily in the summer in the Hamptons."

Trump DOJ stumbles in Epstein files case with 'embarrassing' excuse: legal expert

The Trump Justice Department stumbled in an Jeffrey Epstein files case with an "embarrassing" excuse flagged by a legal expert on Saturday.

In a recent episode of the Legal AF podcast, analyst Michael Popok discussed the DOJ's response to an injunction requiring it to translate foreign-language documents in the Epstein files. The injunction stems from journalist Katie Phang's lawsuit demanding translation and a published redaction log, which has seen early success, Popok noted.

"It's not like the World Cup. It's not like there's 48 different countries of languages," Popok said. "What is it? Four or five languages. We know who was involved in the Epstein scandal. Maybe French, maybe Italian, certainly English, not a foreign language, but you know the way the Brits speak."

Even though the DOJ responded to a judge's injunction "in the nick of time," it refused to translate parts of the Epstein files, saying reviewers "could not translate it on the fly," according to Popok.

"They could use an app, an AI app, that would do the initial cut of translation," Popok said. "It's embarrassing that they think they can get away with this."

Popok summed up the DOJ's response as "you're not getting it, judge. We're not translating it." However, Popok added that the judge in the case, Emmet Sullivan, "doesn't suffer fools" and predicted that he'll be "p----- off" with the DOJ's excuse for not complying with the injunction.

"You're gonna see it in his next order," Popok said. "Remember we're talking about Epstein survivors and sexual abuse victims, many of them who were girls at the time."

Read on Substack

'Piece of meat': Beauty queen reveals Trump's disturbing question after alleged assault

A former beauty queen says President Donald Trump asked her a disturbing question after an alleged sexual assault she says occurred decades ago, according to a new report.

Former Miss Europe contestant Beatrice Keul, 55, told PunchUp on Wednesday that Trump — whom she accuses of sexually assaulting her at the Plaza Hotel in 1993 — proceeded to grill her about Jeffrey Epstein.

“Have you spoken to Jeff?” Trump allegedly asked.

Interviewer Tom Latchem added, "Keul told PunchUp that this suggested to her that he and Epstein were coordinating which young women would be invited to private parties, including at Mar-a-Lago."

Keul, then 23, says she received a personal invitation from the then-real estate mogul to participate in the Donald J. Trump American Dream Pageant, according to reports.

On Wednesday, Keul described the pageant as a “playground” for Epstein, the convicted sex criminal who died in a New York City jail cell before he could face sex trafficking charges, and the men who wanted his help securing access to her fellow contestants.

“They knew exactly what they wanted,” Keul reportedly said. “I was fresh meat.”

Epstein promised young women flights, hotel stays and invites to parties at Mar-a-Lago, Trump’s resort in Palm Beach, Florida, Keul told PunchUp.

But White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson denied Keul’s claims.

“Just as President Trump has said, he’s been totally exonerated on anything relating to Epstein,” Jackson said in a statement to PunchUp. “And by releasing thousands of pages of documents, cooperating with the House Oversight Committee’s subpoena request, signing the Epstein Files Transparency Act, and calling for more investigations into Epstein’s Democrat friends, President Trump has done more for Epstein’s victims than anyone before him.”

Keul is hardly the first person to levy such accusations against Trump. When Keul first revealed her accusations to the Daily Beast in 2024, she became the 28th person to accuse him of sexual assault.

An explosive FBI interview buried in the Epstein files aligns with Keul’s description of her encounter with Trump. That witness accused Trump of orchestrating a team of recruiters to search Trump Tower for women to have sex with, the files show.

In 2020, former contestants of Elite Model Management’s Look of the Year competition in 1991 and 1992 told the Guardian Trump appeared backstage as they changed clothes.

“Every time we changed, it was like Trump would find a reason to come backstage,” said Stacy Wilkes, then 16. Another contestant recalled similar instances. “I remember thinking, what have I got myself into?”